Ridgeway Rehab Center
5743 Edmondson Avenue, Catonsville, MD 21228 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 61 certified beds · (410) 747-5250 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2021
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $37,805 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-06)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.3% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 26.9% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.7% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.0% | 16.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.7% | 96.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.1% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.0% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.9% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.83 | 1.33 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.96 | 1.20 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.6%CMS range 34.9–50.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.7–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.5–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure that a resident or their responsible party (RP) was offered the opportunity to develop an advanced directive, and 2) ensure two certificates of incapacity included a diagnosis or reason for the incapacity. These failures affected three residents (Resident #8, #10, and #15) out of a sample of three reviewed for advanced directives during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment—often including a living will—made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a physician. A physician's certification of decision-making capacity confirms whether a patient can understand their medical situation, appreciate the consequences of their choices, use reasoning, and communicate a treatment preference. Under specific legal standards, such as Maryland law, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) ensure a resident had baseline care plan / care plans within the required timeframe and provided the resident and/or family with a copy of the care plans, and 2) provide evidence in the resident's medical record that this summary had been delivered. This was evident for Four (Resident #8, #9, #40, and #15) out of 18 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: A baseline care plan (BLCP) must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility. It must include initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the BLCP and a current medication list must be given to each resident and/or their representative and documented in the medical record. The completion and implementation of the BLCP is intended to promote continuity of care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plan meetings were held concurrently with quarterly care plan revisions, and resident and/or their representatives were invited to care plan meetings. This deficiency affected six residents (Resident #5, #7, #9, #17, #40, and #51) of 6 residents reviewed for care planning during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Care plans serve as essential guides for the care residents receive within the facility. They must be developed within seven days of a resident's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least quarterly, or more frequently as necessitated by a change in condition. The facility is required to ensure these care plans are developed and revised by an IDT, which includes the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing assistant, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #23) out of 9 residents reviewed for dining related concerns during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: A member of the survey team interviewed Resident #23 on 2/5/26 at 9:41 AM. Resident said their portions of food were too small and he/she had been asking for larger portions but the facility refused. This surveyor interviewed Resident #23 at 12:25 PM on 2/6/26. The resident was asked about the portions that were served. The resident said the portions served were too small. It was observed on 2/6/26 at 12:25 PM that the resident's meal slip said Roasted Red skin potatoes which was the resident's choice, but the resident was served mashed potatoes. The resident only became aware of the change in food items when the meal tray was served. The dietician (Staff #23) was interviewed on 2/9/26 at 1:15 PM. She said the resident was ordered to receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the resident failed to ensure a resident room had two chairs and to ensure a resident's furniture was maintained in a homelike manner. This was evident for one nursing unit (Rose Hall) out of the two nursing units.The findings include:A survey team member observed on 2/5/26 during the initial tour of the facility that one room (205) did not have any chairs, and another room (206) had a bedside table that had chipped edges. This surveyor toured on 2/20/26 at 2:48 PM the rooms noted to have had issues on the initial tour. This surveyor knocked on the door for room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident acknowledged the surveyor and nodded when asked for permission to enter the room. This surveyor looked around the room and observed that there were no chairs in the room. Visitors, as well as the residents themselves, did not have a place to sit.This surveyor then went to room [ROOM NUMBER]. This surveyor observed that the bedside table for B bed was chipped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, a review of complaint #2734220, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances. This deficiency was evident for one of three residents (Resident #5) reviewed for grievances during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During the investigation of complaint #2734220 on 2/05/26 at 9:31 AM, it was revealed that Resident #5's family expressed safety concerns regarding a roommate (Resident #41). The family reported that Resident #41 had been standing over Resident #5 in an intimidating manner.In a phone interview on 2/05/26 at 11:30 AM, the complainant stated that Resident #41 exhibited several behavioral issues, including taking other residents' items, appearing undressed, and blocking doorways. The complainant stated, We did not feel safe with the roommate . We requested a room change, but the facility did not take it seriously. The room was finally changed the day after the incident occurred.A review of Resident #5's medical records on 2/10/26 at 9:31 AM revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications and/or chemical restraints. This was evident by the facility utilized psychotropic medications without adequate clinical indications for use. This deficient practice was identified in one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication regimens during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings included:Lewy Body Dementia (LBD): A progressive brain disease associated with abnormal protein deposits (alpha-synuclein). It is characterized by fluctuating alertness, vivid visual hallucinations, and Parkinsonian motor symptoms.Psychosis: A symptom involving a loss of contact with reality, often manifesting as hallucinations or delusions.Clonazepam: A benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety, panic disorders, and seizure disorders by slowing the central nervous system.Clozapine: A potent antipsychotic medication primarily indicated for treatment-resistant schizophrenia or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for one resident (Resident #8) out of five reviewed for active diagnoses and unnecessary medications during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each resident receives appropriate care.A review of Resident #8's medical record on 2/06/26 at 7:27 AM revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), Parkinson's disease, anxiety, and depression. However, the most recent MDS, dated [DATE], failed to code psychiatric/mood disorders. Specifically, Section I (Active Diagnoses, items I5700-I6100), which includes anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was unable to carry out ADL's, was provided the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for grooming during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Activities of daily living (ADL) are skills required to manage one's basic physical needs, including personal hygiene and grooming, dressing, toileting, transferring or ambulating and eating.On 2/05/2026 at 10:59 AM Resident #1 was observed lying in bed, their fingernails were outgrown with brown stains on the inside. Their facial hair was unshaven, about 4 inches long, with dry food particles stuck on it. Resident #1's toenails were thick, protruding out, about 3/4 inch long. The resident was wearing a hospital gown; it had brownish stains towards the chest area. A shirt with a pair of pants was placed on top of the baseboard at the foot of the bed, the resident looked unkept.A second observation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff and resident's interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1), act on a physician's recommendations for Resident #51 and 2), administer medications as ordered by the physician for Resident #3. This was evident during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include1) On 2/05/2026 at 9:10 AM Resident #51 told the surveyor that they were ordered Mirtazapine 15mg for appetite/ antidepressant. Resident #51 stated that the medicine makes them drowsy and s/he can't wake up or function normally and would consider taking half a dose instead of the full dose. The Resident was asked if they told any of the staff and the Resident said they made the nursing staff and their physician aware of it.A review of the physician's order on 2/11/26 at 9:30 AM revealed an order written on 2/2/26 for Resident #51. It read: Mirtazapine Tablet 15 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression/poor appetite. Further review of the February 2026 medication administration record (MAR) revealed the resident has been getting the full dose of the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to timely address and communicate significant weight loss. This deficiency was evident for one (Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for nutrition during this annual survey.The findings include:During a phone interview on 2/05/26 at 11:53 AM, Resident #5's family stated the resident did not receive adequate hydration, which resulted in multiple hospital transfers. As part of the investigation into this concern, the surveyor reviewed Resident #5's medical records regarding hydration and nutritional status.A review of medical records on 2/09/26 at 8:57 AM revealed a pattern of hospital transfers and readmissions: the resident was transferred on 9/08/25 and readmitted on [DATE]; then transferred again at the resident's request on 9/12/25 and readmitted on [DATE]. The medical record documented the following weights:9/02/25: 185 lbs (Bed scale)9/11/25: 161.4 lbs (Bed scale) - Significant loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of employee files and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a system to ensure nursing staff were competent in their respective skill sets. This deficiency was evident in 3 (Staff #29, #30, #31) out of 5 employee files reviewed for competencies during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 2/10/26 at 7:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the competency records of five randomly selected staff members. The review revealed the following:-Staff #29: Hired in December 2024 as a GNA, resigned, and was rehired in December 2025. The employee file lacked documentation of competency upon their rehire in 2025.-Staff #30 and #31: Hired in December 2024 as RNs. The employee files for Staff #30 and #31 lacked records verifying clinical skill competency.During an interview on 2/10/26 at 7:18 AM, Staff #1 (Business Officer) stated that HR verifies competency records for new hires and that the nursing department conducts annual evaluations. However, upon a joint review of the files for Staff #29, #30, and #31, Staff #1 verified that no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 2 of 4 medicine (Med) carts, including the med room fridge observed on the nursing unit during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On [DATE] at 10:20 AM the nurse med cart was checked in the pink hall with Staff #24 a licensed practical nurse (LPN). These meds were found with no labels to indicate when they were opened: -Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg/inhale nasal spray 16gm-Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative Diluted/Aplisol, 5 Tu/0.1 ml-5ml bottle These medications were also found expired in the pink hall med cart:-Levetiracetam 100mg/ml solution oral solution with expiration of [DATE]-H-Chlor 120.125% solution with expiration date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:50 AM Observation of the med room with Staff #6 the assistant director of nursing (ADON) revealed expired meds kept in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a dental consult and/or a dental visit for all residents. This was evident for one (#10) out of one resident reviewed for dental concerns. The findings include: This surveyor reviewed Resident #10's clinical record on 2/5/26. The clinical record review revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Further review revealed that there were no dental consults since admission in the clinical record. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 2/9/26 at 3:30 PM. She was asked about the lack of dental consults. She replied that there have been no complaints from the resident or from the family, so a dental consult/visit was never obtained. This surveyor explained that the regulation states that an evaluation from an outside source needs to be done on an annual basis. She expressed an understanding of the findings.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of meal service times and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure meals were served less than 14 hours apart. This was evident for all residents receiving a meal tray. The findings include: A review of meal service times revealed that the facility serves dinner with the last food cart having a delivery time of 5:20 PM and the first breakfast cart has a delivery time of 7:40 AM. This represents a 14 hour and 20-minute gap. The Food Service Manager (Staff #28) was interviewed on 2/11/26 at 10:30 AM. This surveyor shared the above finding with her. She stated that the time listed for the food cart that is delivered to the assisted living does not count. She said she understood the finding and would adjust the time the carts went up to reflect a time span of less than 14 hours.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that key essential personnel were present during monthly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings. This deficiency was evident in three of the eight monthly QA meeting attendance sheets reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 2/11/26 at 11:29 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting attendance sheets from February 2025 to the present. The review revealed that key essential personnel did not sign in for the following dates:-04/30/25: The Infection Preventionist was not in attendance.-06/25/25: There was no evidence of attendance by the Medical Director.-December 2025 (date not clearly documented): There was no evidence of attendance by the Director of Nursing.During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 2/11/26 at 12:40 PM, the NHA reviewed the QAPI attendance sheets with the surveyor and validated the absence of documentation regarding the attendance of these key…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1), ensure that laundry staff utilize appropriate Infection control measures in the laundry room and 2), have hand sanitizers available in the resident's room for infection prevention in 14 of 31 residents' rooms. This was evident during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include1) On 2/10/26 at 9:14 AM, an inspection of the facility's laundry room was conducted and on the clean folding table were observed personal items such as: a black handbag, an animal print material , 2 cells phones, one plugged into the wall socket and charging on the table, 2 clear 12 oz plastic soda cups, one containing a small amount of brown liquid, an open bottle of Pepsi cola about 3/4 full. On the dirty side were also observed the absence of a gown or mask for sorting/handling dirty laundry, only gloves were seen.In an interview with the laundry aid, Staff #21 on 2/10/26 at 9:20 AM, she was asked about the process for sorting laundry. She explained that dirty laundry are not sorted, because they come…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a process for tracking nurse aide participation in required training. Specifically, the facility did not ensure all aides received the mandated 12 hours of annual training, including abuse prevention and dementia management, nor did it address areas of weakness identified in performance reviews. This deficiency was evident for two of two Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #29 and #32) reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings included:On 2/09/26 at 11:23 AM, the surveyor reviewed randomly selected employees' files. The review revealed that as below:-GNA #29: Hired in December 2024, resigned, and re-hired in December 2025. There was no evidence to support the employee receiving dementia training upon re-hire.-GNA #32: Hired in April 2025. There were no records indicating the employee received dementia training upon hire.During an interview on 2/10/26 at 8:56 AM, Staff #25 (Regional Director of Nursing) stated that the previous Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow up on a resident's statement of possible abuse during another investigation for abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1 ) out of 1 resident reviewed for medical records during this complaint survey. The findings include:On October 14th, 2025, at 2 PM, during the review of records for Resident #11's facility-reported incident, it was found that Resident # 1 had stated yes to all the questions asked on the Resident Interview form for abuse. No comments were added, nor any additional information to the claim.On October 15th, 2025, at 1:15 PM, the DON was questioned about the reported incident and if she knew that there was a resident who responded that they thought abuse was occurring in the facility during that investigation. The acting DON stated that she was unaware of the resident's claim and that the prior DON was present during this investigation and would have asked the questions to the residents. The acting DON made the surveyors aware that the resident was still at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised at least quarterly and as necessary to address changes in residents' conditions. This deficient practice was evident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #2) during a complaint survey.The findings include:On 10/14/25 at 12:13 PM, record review for Resident #2 revealed the most recent care plan was dated 3/18/25. On 10/14/25 at 12:22 PM, record review for Resident #1 revealed the most recent comprehensive care plan was dated 4/9/25. During an interview with the Director of Nursing at 12:37pm, it was confirmed that the quarterly care plans were significantly past due for Residents #1 and #2.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to provide and maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment for the residents. This was found to be evident when observations were made during tours of the building during the facility's survey. The findings include the following: An entrance tour was conducted on 10/27/24 at 9:15 AM and the following concerns were identified: Room # 200 was observed with marring noted on the wall Room # 201 was observed with marring noted on the wall behind each bed and near the door Room # 203 was observed with marring noted on the side of the walls Room # 204 was observed with marring noted on the walls, and the floor was dirty with a dark substance noted throughout the room Room # 205 was observed with marring noted on the side of wall around each bed and the wall near the door Room # 206 was observed with marring noted on the walls and around each of the beds Room # 208 was observed with a dirty floor with black substances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident or resident representative in writing of the reason for transfer to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #55, # 37, # 41, #58) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) On 10/30/24 at 07:30 AM, review of Resident #55's medical record revealed he/she was hospitalized on [DATE] and 9/24/24. On 10/30/24 at 11:25 AM, an interview with the [NAME] President of sister company (Staff #21) revealed they are unable to provide a copy of the written transfer form from the 9/21/24 hospitalization. On 10/30/24 at 11:39 AM, an interview with the Business Office Manager (Staff #27) revealed that the written transfer form is not sent to the family and if the resident would like to see it, they can request it from the office but that it is verbal and not automatically provided to them. On 11/06/24 at 2:50 PM, at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility protocol, and staff interviews, it was determined that the kitchen failed to store food items so as to maintain the integrity of the specific item. This was evident in one of the kitchen refrigerators, the dry storage area and the cooking area. The findings include: 1. On 10/27/24 at 09:07 AM, an initial observation of one of the kitchen fridges revealed orange slices in a container labeled use by 10/24/24, dijon mustard labeled use by 7/14/24, a block of yellow american cheese opened and undated, an undated opened container of mayo, an undated opened container of relish, and undated opened container of chopped garlic. Further observation of items in the same kitchen fridge revealed a food that the surveyor was unable to identify that was used and undated. The surveyor requested the cook (Staff #25) to identify the food and he was unable to and threw out the food. 2. On 10/27/24 at 9:27 AM, an observation of dry storage foods revealed three opened pasta bags undated, a box of opened rice undated, an opened bag of croutons undated, two opened bags of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that a copy of the resident's Advanced Directives documents had been obtained and maintained in the resident's medical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) out of 3 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The findings include: Advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Power of Attorney (POA) is a document that allows a person to appoint someone to act on their behalf with respect to certain matters, such as medical, financial, real estate, and business transactions. On 10/28/2024 at 11:01AM, a review of Resident #4's electronic medical record revealed no documentation of an Advanced Directives for the resident. On 10/29/2024 at 7:26AM, during a review of Resident #4's electronic medical record, the Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility reported incident (FRI), and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an injury of an unknown source. This was evident for 1 (Resident #58) out of 11 residents investigated for allegations of abuse during the survey. The findings include: On 10/31/2024 at approximately 2:10PM during review of Resident #58's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered a Nurses Note written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #36, dated 9/23/2024 at 5:13AM, which stated that the resident was found in another resident's room and appeared to have bitten his/her lip, blood noted [on the resident's chin area]. There was no documentation of an assessment or change in condition note by LPN #36 in the resident's electronic medical record. On 10/31/2024 at approximately 2:17PM, the Surveyor reviewed the facility reported incident file of an alleged abuse for Resident #58. A review revealed that at 4:00AM the resident was found by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #37,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to include the resident care plan goals with the required documentation during a transfer. This was evident for 2 (#55 and #37) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 10/30/24 at 07:30 AM, review of Resident #55's medical record revealed he/she was hospitalized on [DATE] and 9/24/24. On 10/30/24 at 09:05 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that the care plans are not sent with the resident upon transfer from the facility. 2) On 10/30/24 at 07:35 AM, review of Resident #37's medical record revealed that he/she was hospitalized [DATE] and 10/25/24. On 10/30/24 at 09:05 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that the care plans are not sent with the resident upon transfer from the facility. On 10/30/24 at 09:17 AM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN, Staff #12) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN, Staff #26) revealed the nurses go off of a transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have system in place to ensure the residents and/or resident representatives are notified in writing of the bed hold policy at the time of discharge/transfer to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #41, #55, and #37) out of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the survey. The finding include: 1) On 10/30/2024 at 8:05AM, a review of Resident #41's electronic medical record revealed that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 8/29/2024. Additional review of the electronic medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate that Resident #41 had been notified in writing of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. During an interview conducted on 10/30/2024 at 9:02AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) #2, the Surveyor expressed the concern that Resident #41's electronic medical record failed to reveal documentation that resident and/or their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the coding of the resident assessment by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator accurately reflected the resident status at the time the assessment was done. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 12) of 1 residents reviewed for Activities of daily living (ADL's) during the investigation stage of the survey. Findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. On 10/28/24 at 10:31 AM Resident # 12 medical record was reviewed. Resident # 12 was admitted with the following but not limited to diagnosis: Hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (weakness to one side of the body) and history of Malignant Neoplasm of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for a resident who wanders and was at risk for elopement. This was evident for 1 (Resident #56) out of 5 residents investigated for accidents during the survey. The findings include: Wandering behavior is when a person becomes confused about their surroundings and stray from where they are supposed to be. Elopement risk describes an individual's behavior of leaving an area without permission or supervision. On 10/29/2024 at approximately 1:30 PM, a review of Resident #56's electronic medical record revealed a skilled progress note written on 9/23/2024 at 4:56 AM that stated the resident was walking up and down the hallways and in and out of various resident rooms. The resident refused redirection and aimlessly wandered. The resident stated that he/she wanted to go home. During further review of Resident #56's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered an Elopement Evaluation note with an elopement score of 3, indicating the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, interviews and other pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure accurate documentation of resident code status regarding Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This was evident for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #37) reviewed. The findings include: Code Status refers to the level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing stops. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) refers to any medical intervention used to restore circulatory and/or respiratory function that has ceased. MOLST (Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) refers to a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. The medical orders are based on a patient's wishes about medical treatments. When the MOLST form is updated, the MOLST form shall be voided and a new MOLST form prepared when there is a change to any of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to residents based on their preferences and as indicated in their care plan. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #20) out of 1 resident reviewed for activities. The findings include: On 10/27/24 at 01:31 PM, an observation of Resident #20 revealed she/he in bed looking straight ahead at the wall with no activity stimulation. On 10/29/24 at 09:00 AM, review of Resident #20's record revealed a care plan focus of cognitive deficits related to dementia and one of the interventions indicated the resident was to maintain involvement in cognitive stimulation. On 10/29/24 at 09:05 AM, an interview with Activities Director (Staff #16) revealed that she and her activities assistant (Staff #17) would visit residents 1:1 for those that do not like being around people so that they get the person contact, and that they go around to see everyone everyday. Further interview with Staff #16 revealed that they would document the visits and all activities that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1) a resident was accurately assessed and received immediate treatment after an injury of an unknown source, 2) orders were being implemented by staff and 3) staff were completing assessments of residents admitted or readmitted to the facility. This was evident for 3 (Resident #58, # 23, # 27 ) out of 26 residents investigated for allegations of abuse. The findings include: 1) On 10/31/2024 at approximately 2:10 PM during review of Resident #58's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered a Nurses Note written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #36, dated 9/23/2024 at 5:13 AM, which stated that the resident was found in another resident's room and appeared to have bitten his/her lip, blood noted [on the resident's chin area]. There was no documentation for an assessment or change in condition note in the resident's electronic medical record. On 10/31/2024 at approximately 2:17 PM, the Surveyor reviewed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff had competency evaluations. This was evident for 3 (GNA #30, GNA #31, GNA #10) of 5 randomly selected nursing staff reviewed for competencies. The findings include: Nursing competence is defined by the American Nurses Association as an expected level of performance that integrates knowledge, skills, abilities, and judgment. A review of random staff files on 11/01/24 at 07:43 AM revealed the following: 1. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA, Staff #10) was hired in March 2024. No competency evaluation was found for Staff #10. 2. Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA, Staff #30) was hired in August 2016. No competency evaluation was found for Staff #30. 3. GNA, Staff #31 was hired in June 2018. No competency evaluation was found. On 11/01/24 at 08:29 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that competencies for staff should be annual, and for new hires it should be at the 90 day mark as well as the year mark. The surveyor requested for the competencies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation it was determined the facility failed to post the required nursing staffing data on the Daily Staffing Schedule. This was evident for 6 out of 6 days observed during the survey. The findings included: On 10/27/24 at 9:00 AM, 10/28/24 at 7:15 AM, 10/29/24 at 7:00 AM, 10/30/24 at 7:00 AM, 10/31/24 at 7:30, and 11/01/24 at 7:00 AM, upon entrance into the facility, the surveyor made observations which revealed a posted staffing sheet for the shifts throughout the day but failed to reveal the facility's census as well as the actual and total number of hours worked by Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Registered Nurses (RNs). On 11/01/24 at 2:31PM, the surveyor reviewed the concern with the Chief Operations Officer (Staff #14) that the facility's daily staffing sheet does not meet the required nursing staff data.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that the attending physician and/or Director of Nursing had documented and signed in the medical record to show they have reviewed an irregularity or recommendation identified by the pharmacist. This was evident for 3 (Resident #19, #41, and #50) of 5 residents investigated for Unnecessary Medications, Psychotropic Medications, and Medication Regimen Review during the survey. The findings include: A Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is when a consultant pharmacist completes a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record. It must be completed at least monthly for each resident. It contains recommendations related to a resident's medication regimen that must be addressed by the resident's physician. 1. On 11/6/2024 at 9:45AM, a review of Resident #19's electronic medical record revealed the clinical pharmacist identified an irregularity during the resident's MRR and made a recommendation on 2/4/2024, 3/4/2024, 4/7/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a psychotropic medication prescribed as needed (PRN), had an end date that was limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (#55) of 5 residents reviewed for medications. The findings include: On 10/31/24 at 07:48 AM, review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an active order for hydroxzine by mouth every 8 hours as needed with an order date of 9/19/24 but failed to be limited to 14 days. Hydroxyzine is used to help control anxiety and tension caused by nervous and emotional conditions. On 11/01/24 08:20 AM, review of the facility policy labeled Psychotropic Medication Use revealed that, PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. On 11/01/24 at 08:29 AM, the surveyor reviewed the concern with the NHA regarding the facility's failure to ensure PRN psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication and medical treatment supplies were stored safely. This was evident for 1 of 1 medication room and 1 of 1 medical supply room observed during the survey. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:02 AM, the Surveyor observed the medication room located behind the nursing station. The Surveyor observed the following expired items: a box of Banatrol Plus with an expiration date of [DATE] on the shelf above the med cart and 3 packs of Curad Xeroform Petroleum dressing, with the expiration date of 4-2023, in the wound cabinet. Further observation of the medication room revealed Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate ordered for two days for Resident #37 and a bag with 3 unopened vials of Ceftriaxone Sodium injection solution to be reconstituted and a opened and undated vial of Lidocaine ordered for 3 days for Resident #1. On [DATE] at 10:24 AM, during a review of Resident #37's electronic medical record, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was served a meal according to a predetermined menu that incorporated the resident's preferences. This was evident for 3 (Resident #32, #17, #8) of 5 Resident trays observed during a meal. The findings include: 1) An observation made on 11/01/24 at 11:51 AM in the kitchen during the tray line revealed Resident #32's meal ticket which indicated a regular diet and a peanut butter jelly sandwich was written in as a request. On 11/01/24 at 12:14 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #32 who was eating her/his food from their tray which failed to reveal a peanut and butter jelly sandwich. The surveyor observed GNA (Staff #23) near and requested that they look at the meal ticket together and she confirmed that the ticket indicated a peanut butter and jelly sandwich which was not on the tray. 2) An observation made on 11/01/24 at 11:51 AM in the kitchen during the tray line revealed Resident #8's meal ticket which indicated a regular meal but did not list rice which was the starch of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident medical record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate physician orders for the use of oxygen for Resident #15. This was evident for 1 resident out of 6 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include the following: During observation rounds on 10/30/2024 at 9:30 AM Resident #15 was observed to be on 2 liters of oxygen by nasal cannula. During an interview and observation rounds on 10/30/2024 at 10:07 AM staff #18 verified and stated that Resident #15 was receiving 2 liters of oxygen by nasal cannula and that he/she was not able to find a physician's order stating that the resident was to be receiving oxygen, and the resident had been on oxygen for a long time and should be on oxygen continuously. Review of the Resident #15's medical record on 10/30/2024 at 10:45 AM revealed no physician orders for resident to receive oxygen. During an interview on 10/30/2024 at 11:00 AM staff #21 stated that there was no physician order for Resident #15 to receive oxygen and that the physician would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist Designee onsite at the facility to provide oversight to the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This was found to be evident during the survey. Findings include: During the entrance conference on 10/27/24 at 10:52 AM with the Administrator (Staff # 1) and the Director of Nursing (DON) (Staff # 2) who were present, the Administrator stated that the DON had been working at the facility for approximately 1 month and would be going to an Infection Control training class. During the interim she stated that the facility was utilizing the Corporate Infection Control Designee (Staff # 3) who is certified, but she does not work in the building. The Administrator was made aware that it is a requirement that the Infection Control Designee needs to work onsite at the facility and not off-site in a corporate role. An interview was conducted with the Corporate Infection Control Designee on 10/27/24 at 1:45 PM and she stated that she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews it was determined the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in working and safe operating conditions. This was evident for 3 hand sanitizer dispensers and 1 out 2 DS Smart vital sign machines observed during the survey. The findings include the following: During observation rounds and interview on 10/31/2024 at 3:09 PM the Maintenance Director staff #29 verified that there were 3 hand sanitizer dispensers located outside of rooms #108 - #115 that did not have sanitizer and/or the dispensers were not secured on the wall. During observation rounds and interview on 11/01/2024 at 10:01 AM with staff #3, a DS Smart vital sign machine was not being used by staff, would not turn on and the machine connection wires did not fit properly into the machine. Staff #3 verified and stated that the machine was broken, and it would be replaced immediately. Staff #3 further stated that there was not enough working vital sign equipment on the floor for staff to use to obtain resident vital signs. During an interview on 11/01/2024 at 10:10 AM staff #12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions formulated from resident assessments to potentially prevent further falls. This was evident during the review of 1 of 2 reviewed regarding falls (Resident #26). The findings include: During the medical record review of Resident #26 on 3/22/2021 at 10:25 AM during the investigative portion of the survey, it was determined that s/he was noted with a history of falls and was noted on the floor on 3/18/2021. Further review of the medical record for Resident #26 on 3/24/2021 at 10:08 AM revealed partial diagnosis including cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, seizures, chronic pain, muscle wasting and atrophy and difficulty walking. Additionally, care plans were in place and implemented on 6/2/2020 related to the resident's history of falls, gait and transfer dysfunctions with interventions and revisions noted on 9/30/2020, 10/26/2020, 10/8/2020 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies to prevent transmission and cross-contamination of germs and microorganisms within the facility by not properly discarding soiled items, not maintaining sanitary transport and storage of respitory equiment, and failing to ensure a resident had on proper personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to being in socail setting with others (Resident #27). This was found to be evident for multiple identified concerns that were observed during the facility's annual Medicare/ Medicaid survey. Findings include: Observations were made of the Observation Unit (where newly admitted residents are placed for quarantine for a designated time frame) and the following concerns were identified: 1. On 3/23/21 at 10:15 AM an observation was made of a dirty balled-up towel that was placed on top of a PPE bin in front of a resident's room. Staff # 7 was made aware at the time of the observation and she opened the towel and identified that food particles were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and observation it was determined the facility staff failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity by failing to: 1) ensure a urinary bag was covered; 2) provide an environment that promotes the dignity and respect of residents by addressing residents in an appropriate manner and 3). enhance and promote a resident's dignity by not providing the resident assistance with toileting and instead of placing a depend on the resident. This was evident for 3 of 23 residents reviewed during the survey (Residents#21, #5, #37) . The findings include: A foley catheter is a urinary collection system consisting of a tube inserted into the bladder via the urethra. A suprapubic catheter is a tube inserted directly into the bladder through the abdominal wall to drain urine. The urine then drains through the tubing into a drainage bag that is attached to the side of the bed or chair. A privacy cover is placed over the drainage bag to hide the contents thus ensuring privacy and preventing embarrassment for the resident, roommate, or visitors. The findings include: 1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of a facility reported incident resident and staff interviews and review of medical record and other pertinent documentation. It was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure effective system(s) to maintain an environment free from neglect for vulnerable resident who is totally dependent on staff to provide all ADL care and services during for unknown time frame on the midnight nursing shift. This was evident for 1 out of 4 residents during investigative portion of annual survey (Resident #28) . The findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) is a mandated process that ensures residents in nursing homes receive comprehensive and periodic assessments that are both standardized and reproducible to ensure each resident's needs are clearly understood and that care can be appropriately and effectively planned and delivered (based on the assessment). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a core set of screening questions that provide the foundation for the RAI process. Providers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the information used to complete the Annual and Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for medication usage was correct for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the investigation stage of the long-term care survey process (Resident #15 and #26). The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. The findings include: 1. A review of the medical for Resident #15 on 3/24/21 at 8:33 AM revealed an order for Ambien a sleep aide classified as a hypnotic.Further review of the annual MDS assessment on 3/24/21 at 8:31 AM compared to the resident's electronic medication administration record (MAR) failed to document that the resident was receiving the prescribed Ambien. The MDS coordinator, Staff #12 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to 1) develop a care plan specific for a resident (Resident #16) with a diagnosis of Dementia; 2) monitor a resident (Resident # 37) who is receiving antibiotic therapy in accordance with the resident care plan and 3) failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objective to meet the Resident (Resident #25) This was found to be evident for 3 of 22 residents reviewed during the annual survey. Findings include: 1) A medical record review for Resident #16 was conducted on 3/25/21 at 9:40 AM and it revealed the resident has the following but not limited diagnosis: Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance. Review of physician orders for resident # 16 on 3/25/21 at 10:00AM revealed the resident is on the following medications: Quetiapine 25 mg (0.5 tablet) po (by mouth) 1 time a day 8:00 am for anxiety/agitation. A review of a consultation note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews is was determined that the facility failed to revise update care plan that addressed residents actual fall. This was evident 1 out of 5 resident's involving during the survey process Resident #28. The finding includes: The care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Medical record review revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility from acute care hospital with diagnosis which included but not limited to S/p Fall; Rhabdomyolysis (seizures or muscle tremors); Cerebrovascular Accident and Acute Kidney Injury and other chronic health condition which requires ongoing treatment. A review of intake MD00161695 facility reported incident which occurred on 12/16/20 involving Resident #28 revealed that on 12/16/20 Resident #28 was not in s/his room during the 10:30 p.m.-7:00 a.m. shift and on 12/17/20 approximately 7:15 a.m. the resident was found lying on floor under the bed in hospital gown had experienced unwitnessed fall.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to monitor for signs and symptoms and the effectiveness of a medication after a resident was placed on antibiotic therapy following a surgical procedure. This was found to be evident for 1 of 22 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey (Resident # 37). The Findings include: Resident # 37 medical record was reviewed on 3/25/21 at 1:38 PM and it revealed the resident was on Cephalexin oral Capsule 500 mg 1 PO (by mouth) 4 times a day. Antibiotic therapy status post ORIF LLE (Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Left Lower Extremity). Further review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) on 3/26/21 at 9:10 AM revealed the resident received the medication, however, there was no documentation of monitoring for side effects or effectiveness of the medication. An interview was conducted on 3/26/21 at 9:25 AM with the Corporate Nurse Consultant, Staff # 3 and the Administrator, Staff # 1 and they were asked to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a resident complaint, interviews and the sampling of two (2) test trays, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure resident trays are served at a palatable temperature. The findings include: Interview with Resident #5 on 3/23/2-21 at 10:19 AM revealed a concern that hot foods are not served hot. A test tray was requested from the dietary manager on 3/24/2021 in order to test the palatability and the temperature of the meal served at lunch. In preparation for the test tray surveyor placed thermometer in ice water to calibrate. Surveyor was notified on 3/24/2021 that the surveyor prepared test tray was ready and proceeded to the Pink hallway where Resident #5 resided to acquire the test tray. The tray was taken to the conference room to test for temperature and palatability, this occurred at 12:50 PM. The test tray was opened and was covered in saran wrap. The saran wrap was removed, and temperatures of the meal were taken: Fish 100 degrees Brussel sprouts 110 degrees Mashed potatoes 88 degrees Each were also taste tested and although…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that food was stored and prepared in sanitary manner. This practice has a potential of effecting all residents in facility. Finding includes: During the initial tour of the kitchen took place on 03/22/21 at 7:55 AM accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) staff member #9 who verified all surveyor observed finding. On 03/22/21 at 7:35 AM during breakfast hot food line from steam table to plate reviewed the Food Cook to Temperature line Temperature Log sheet revealed the line cook staff #35 did not record breakfast food temperatures for served hot oatmeal or ham and cheese quiche both temperatures where blank with no temperature reading visible on the log. On 03/22/21 at 7:40 AM during staff interview with staff member #35 who stated I thought I recorded the food temperatures with CDM Manager verified missing cooked food temperatures on the temperature log sheet. On same day at 7:46 AM the observed the CDM Manager take and record the current oatmeal and ham and cheese quiche…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain medical records in the most accurate form for residents This was evident for 2 of 22 residents reviewed in the annual survey (Residents #30 and #28). ( The findings include: A medical record is an official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. The findings include: 1) The facility staff failed to maintain Resident #30 medical record in the most accurate form. A review of Resident #30's medical record on 3/24/21 revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with a stage 2 sacral wound. The resident was ordered Calcium Alginate to be applied to the sacrum at 11:00 am every day. Calcium Alginate is primary dressings designed for use on wounds with moderate to heavy drainage. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-11-06 · tag F0851 — patternElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the required staffing information based on payroll data was submitted for the quarter to the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid services (CMS) as required. The findings include: On 11/01/24 at 1:51 PM, review of the CASPER Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report document from the CMS revealed that the facility had not submitted the required staffing information for the quarter. On 11/06/24 at 12:34 PM, an interview with the Chief Operations Officer revealed that the incident occurred with the previous owners of the facility. On 11/06/24 at 2:50 PM, during the exit, the surveyor reviewed the concern regarding the facility's failure to ensure that the PBJ staffing data was submitted as required.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$37,805 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $37,805 — penalty dated 2024-11-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMJ IRRV TR II | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 11/01/2022 |
| FRIEDLAND, SHALOM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 60% | since 11/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215227. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.