No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Resorts At Chester River Manor Corp

200 Morgnec Road, Chestertown, MD 21620 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (410) 778-4550 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 778-4550 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 20241 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (17% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2024
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
521 Washington Ave · (410) 810-0767 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
701 Washington Ave · (410) 778-5698 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Acme0.2 mi
711 Washington Ave · (410) 778-5641 · Call to confirm hours
Park
E/S CHESTER-FAIRLEE RD · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
400 Morgnec Rd · (410) 778-0390

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.6%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.3%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.2%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.3%16.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.7%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.1%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.8%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.1%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.461.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.381.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 118 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.7%CMS range 39.7–59.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 9.0–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 5.6–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.311.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
16.7%
Total nursing turnover
9.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 95.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-16)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews, the facility staff failed to 1) ensure a resident was seen timely by the Urologist as ordered and 2) reassess and intervene for a resident with urinary catheter problems. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for urinary catheters during a complaint survey. This failure led to the hospitalization of Resident #3 with diagnosis to include urinary tract infection and acute kidney injury. The findings include:Review of Resident #3's medical record on 4/20/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with a urinary catheter (Foley) and a diagnosis of retention of urine. 1) The facility staff failed to ensure the Resident was seen by the Urologist as ordered.Review of the hospital discharge instructions on 4/21/26 at 11:40 AM dated 3/25/26 revealed the Resident was to follow up with urology within 2 weeks.Further review of Resident #3's medical record revealed no evidence that the Resident went to a urology…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 2 (Residents #4, #3) of 9 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must follow applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record must be legible and accurate. 1) On 4/20/26 at 10:10 AM a review of Resident #4's medical record revealed that Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cutaneous abscess of the left lower limb, orthopedic aftercare, pathological fracture of the left femur, and disruption of external operation (surgical) wound. A review of Resident #4's March 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed a physician's order to cleanse the left knee area with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility staff interviews and surveyor record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded accurately. This finding was found to be evident in 4 (Resident #1, #9, #33 and #103) out of 16 Residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a comprehensive, federally mandated clinical evaluation for Residents in Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes in the United States. The purpose is to provide a standardized, uniform assessment of Resident health status, identify problems, strengths, and preferences, and inform care planning and payment. MDS assessments are completed by trained nursing home staff upon admission, quarterly, annually, and whenever a Resident's condition significantly changes. Functional capabilities, cognitive status, health conditions, treatment, therapies, psychosocial well-being and discharge planning are assessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have a safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in the following Resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 109, 111, 112 and 113) and the facility conference room during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On the initial tour of the facility on 12/8/2025 at 8:45 AM the surveyor observed the facility environment not in good repair as there were doors chipped and marred, doors not shutting properly and a missing call light string for bathroom call light device. The following rooms were observed: room [ROOM NUMBER] - marred/chipped bathroom door; room [ROOM NUMBER] - marred/chipped Resident room door; room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] shared bathroom - missing call light string for call light device; room [ROOM NUMBER] - marred/chipped Resident room door. Additionally, the Resident room door for room [ROOM NUMBER] and the facility conference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility staff interviews and surveyor record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans and follow care plan interventions for Residents. This finding was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #1, #29 and #41) out of 16 Residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:A Care Plan is a written document that outlines a person's care needs and how they will be met. It's a key tool for health and social care professionals to ensure a Resident receives the right level of care. Care plans are usually created after care needs assessment and risk assessment, involving the person receiving care and their family. Care plans are used to guide health and social care professionals in delivering care and standardize evidence-based care. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a comprehensive, federally mandated clinical evaluation for Residents in Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes in the United States. The purpose is to provide a standardized, uniform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility staff interviews and surveyor record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to update and revise a Resident's care plan. This finding was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #29) out of 6 Residents reviewed for revision of Resident's care plans during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:A Care Plan is a written document that outlines a person's care needs and how they will be met. It's a key tool for health and social care professionals to ensure a Resident receives the right level of care. Care plans are usually created after care needs assessment and risk assessment, involving the person receiving care and their family. Care plans are used to guide health and social care professionals in delivering care and standardize evidence-based care. Care plans should be regularly reviewed to monitor their effectiveness. Care plans are updated and revised periodically and as care needs and conditions change with Residents.A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a comprehensive, federally mandated clinical evaluation for Residents in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, review of facility policy, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to utilize professional standards during medication administration. This was found evident in 2 (Resident #59 and #6) of 3 medications administrations on the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1) On 12/8/25 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #59. During the interview, the surveyor observed 4 medications cups on Resident #59's over-the-bed table. Two contained liquid (one orange, one yellow) and the other two contained what appeared to be medications (one with a crushed substance and the other with 12 pills in the cup). Resident #59 stated that the medications were left for him/her to take. Resident #59 stated he/she was not sure what they were but knew the orange substance was Potassium.On 12/9/25 at 11:31 AM, the surveyor reviewed the observations with the Director of Nursing (DON). During the interview the DON confirmed that medications should not be left out at the bedside, and it is the nurses' responsibility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for dependent Residents. This was found evident in 1 (Resident #112) out of 1 residents reviewed for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 12/15/25 at 8:08 AM, the surveyor reviewed intake #361829. The intake alleged that Resident #112 only received one shower while a resident at the facility.On 12/15/25 at 1:28 PM, the surveyor requested all shower documentation for Resident #112 stay from mid-March of 2025 to mid-April of 2025.On 12/16/25 at 7:36 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Unit Manger #4. During the interview UM #6 presented skin check sheets for Resident #112 however, there was no notation or documentation on the skin sheets that indicated that a shower was provided. The UM stated that the skin sheets are done on the 2 assigned shower days each week. The UM stated she would look to see if there was additional documentation.On 12/16/25 at 7:55 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility's policy, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to identify and provide appropriate interventions for a resident's condition. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #112) out of 1 resident reviewed constipation/diarrhea during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 12/15/25 at 8:08 AM, the surveyor reviewed intake #361829. The intake alleged that the facility did not monitor or administer bowel regimen medications appropriately.On 12/16/25 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #112's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March of 2025. Both Miralax (an over-the-counter osmotic laxative used to help with constipation) and Senna (over-the-counter stimulating laxative used to prevent constipation) were ordered to be given. The order for Miralax was daily and Senna was for two pills twice a daily. On 3/19/25 the Miralax was discontinued and Senna was written to be given every other day and decreased to one pill. Additionally, Imodium (a medication given to help with diarrhea) was ordered on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment/services to maintain hearing. This was found evident in 1 of 3 consults reviewed for Resident #59 on the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:On 12/8/25 at 9:44 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #59. During the interview Resident #59 expressed concerns about the facility's coordination regarding his/her appointments.On 12/15/25 at 10:33 AM the surveyor reviewed Resident #59's medical record. The review revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #23 wrote a progress note stating that Resident #59 was complaining about left ear wax build up and difficulty hearing. The note stated that the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was contacted and ordered Debrox ear drops for 5 days (11/15/25-11/19/25) and an Ear Nose Throat (ENT) consult. The LPN wrote, as this is a recurring problem.Next the surveyor reviewed a consult note from Resident #59's consult provider Staff #24. A note was written on 11/17/25 recommended that the left ear be irrigated to remove wax.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer oxygen and maintain continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was found to be evident for 2 (Residents #1, #58) out of 2 residents receiving oxygen and 1 (#1) out of 1 resident receiving CPAP therapy reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:CPAP, or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, is a common treatment for sleep apnea, using a machine to deliver pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open during sleep, preventing breathing pauses, improving sleep quality, and reducing risks of heart disease and stroke.On 12/8/2025 at 10:28 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 was receiving oxygen and had a CPAP machine, which he/she stated was used at night. No oxygen in use signage was found outside the room. On 12/9/2025 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #58 using oxygen and no oxygen in use signage outside the room. During a record review on 12/9/2025 at 1:22 PM, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management as prescribed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #109) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Resident #109's Representative (RP) filed complaint #2580649 regarding the resident's pain management. The RP stated that the resident had been prescribed by the medical personnel pain medication for the large pressure ulcers (PU) and the pain incurred when the resident received treatment for these PU. On 12/15/2025 at 1:00pm, after reviewing the medical record and an interview with the Director of Nursing it was discovered that Resident #109 was not receiving the Tramadol medication every 8 hours as prescribed and the 2 pm dose was signed off on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) as being given but when the Medication Administration Record was compared with the Narcotics Record it was evident that the Tramadol had not been given. The missing Tramadol dates were 8/4-8/8/2025.When the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility staff interview and surveyor record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the posted nurse staffing information document displayed the required information. This finding was found to be evident in the review of sufficient and competent nurse staffing during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:The facility's staffing data document may be a form or spreadsheet, and all the required information displayed clearly and in a visible place. The information should be displayed in a prominent place that was readily accessible to Residents, staff and visitors and presented in a clear and readable format. This information posted must be up to date and current. The facility must post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. The facility must ensure staffing information was accurate and current. The data requirements for the daily posted nurse staffing information document must include facility name, current date, the total number and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor record review, review of consultation notes and Resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices by keeping complete and accurate documentation. This finding was found to be evident in 4 (Resident # 6, #33, #59, and #112) out of 41 Residents reviewed for identifiable information in the Resident medical records during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A Medication Administration Record (MAR) is a legal document used by healthcare professionals to track all medications administered to a Resident. It is a crucial component of a Resident's medical chart, serving to ensure patient safety, accountability, and communication among care teams. The purpose of the MAR is to ensure safe and accurate medication management by providing a clear, trackable history of every medication dose given or missed. A Care Plan is a written document that outlines a person's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain practices to help prevent the transmission of infections. This was found evident on 2 (Resident #6 & #70) out of 2 observations of medication administration during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1) On 12/9/25 at 8:34 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12 prepare medications to be administered to Resident #6. The medications were gathered from a shared medication cart. LPN #12 gathered medications from multiple drawers and bottles. After preparing the medications the surveyor observed LPN #12 walk into Resident #6's room, move a wheelchair and table, and then administer medications. No hand hygiene was utilized before administering the medications.On exiting Resident #6's room the surveyor asked LPN #12 if it is the expectation to perform hand hygiene prior to providing medications to the Resident. He confirmed hand hygiene should be performed before medications are given.2) On 12/9/25 at 9:20 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary environment for a resident. This was found in 1 (Resident #59) of 26 Resident rooms reviewed in the initial sample during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 12/08/2025 at 9:26 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #59's bathroom. The toilet had what appeared to be urine in the toilet bowl. The surveyor noted that around the bowl, on the bathroom floor, it was wet. Resident #59 stated that the toilet had been leaking for some time and that the facility was aware it was leaking. Resident #59 asked the surveyor to flush the toilet and see that it continued to leak. When the surveyor flushed the toilet, the toilet leaked additional water onto the bathroom floor.On 12/08/25 at 11:42 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Maintenance Director Staff #10. During the interview Staff #10 stated he was aware the toilet was leaking and that he had ordered the parts to repair it. He further stated that he was going to repair the toilet today now that the parts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep complete and accurate medical records. This deficient practice was evident in 7 of 20 (#37, #42, #58, #5, #10, #77, #24) resident during the survey. The findings include: 1. During observation rounds on 03/05/24 at 11:21 am Resident #37 made the surveyor aware his/her wheelchair was too large and the wheelchair cushion was too small. On 03/06/24 at 9:51 am during an interview with Director of Rehabilitation #18, he/she verbalized the rehab staff measures the wheelchair to make sure it's a proper fit. When asked if the facility provided the resident with a wheelchair, he/she verbalized needing to check and follow-up. On 03/06/24 at 1:06 pm the surveyor received documentation from Rehab Director #18 which was an occupational therapy evaluation for Resident #37. Rehab Director #18 verbalized the resident's wheelchair and cushion were appropriate for Resident #37 when discharged from rehab services. Upon review of the documentation the surveyor noticed the form did not indicate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the dignity and privacy of a resident as evidenced by the resident's nephrostomy bags left uncovered while outside of their room. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 193) of 86 residents that were observed during the survey. The findings include: A nephrostomy is a small tube inserted through the skin directly into the kidney to allow urine to drain from the kidney into a collecting bag outside the body. It is surgically placed by a healthcare provider if a person's urine cannot leave their body due to kidney stones, kidney infection, trauma, or other reasons. During an observation that took place on 3/5/24 at 10:40 AM, Resident #193 was in the Terrace Lounge during a social coffee time with both nephrostomy bags uncovered, leaving the resident's urine visible to view through the clear bags. On 3/5/24 at 10:41 AM, in an interview conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #29), she stated that when a resident comes out of their room, their nephrostomy bags should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that residents' call bells were in reach to request assistance. This deficient practice was evident in 2 of 8 (Resident #32 and Resident #58) residents assessed for call bell accommodations during the survey. The findings include: On 03/04/24, at 9:14 am during observation rounds the surveyor entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #32 was sitting on the side of the bed. The surveyor noticed that the call bell was draped over the bedside table and was not in the resident's reach. The surveyor greeted Resident #58 and noticed that the call bell was on the floor near the left side of the bed. On 03/04/24 at 9:19 am Social Worker#7 confirmed the surveyor's findings. On 03/06/24 at 12:49 pm during an interview with Director of Nursing #2 who verbalized the managers make rounds twice in the morning and twice in the evening before leaving. It was expected for the call bell to be always assessable to the residents. The Geriatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that scheduled pain medications for a resident were not misappropriated. This was found to be evident during a medication drug storage review and narcotic review and reconciliation for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed during the survey. Findings include: During a review of a medication cart on the Osprey Unit with nurse (#27), a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 3/7/24 at 2:30 PM, the following concerns were identified while reviewing the narcotic drawer: The nurse counted the medication blister pack of Tramadol Tablet 50 mg for Resident # 5. There were 7 pills observed inside of the blister pack. At that time the surveyor and the nurse reviewed the controlled drug receipt record/disposition form. There was an entry on 3/7/24 at 0900 indicating that 1 tablet was given and 6 tablets were left with, a signature entry by the nurse. On the same date at 2:55 PM an interview was conducted with Resident # 5 who was sitting up in bed in their room, was asked if s/he was having any pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to generate a person-centered care plan for a resident who required assistance with dental care. This deficient practice was evident in 1(Resident #35) of 5 resident records reviewed for person centered care plans during the survey. The findings include: On 03/05/24 at 10:22 am during an interview with Resident #35 he/she verbalized needing to see the dentist. On 03/06/24 at 11:58 am the surveyor received copies of Resident #35's dental visits; the last dental visit was 05/25/23. Continued review revealed a 12/19/22 dental summary recommendation to assist the resident with teeth brushing. The surveyor reviewed the resident's care plans which revealed assisting the resident with tooth brushing was not included in the ADL care plan. On 03/06/24 at 3:26 pm during an interview Director of Nursing (DON) #2 verbalized the Minimum Data Set Coordinator(MDS) initiates the baseline care plan. Each team does their own care plans. Whatever triggers out has a care plan. Anything acute that happens the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to have quarterly care plan meetings. This deficient practiced was evidenced in 1 (#73) of 3 resident records reviewed for care plan meetings during the survey. The findings include: On 03/05/24 at 12:32 pm a review of Resident #73's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the last care plan meeting was held 09/02/23. On 03/05/24 3:05 pm during an interview with Social Worker #7 revealed care plan meetings are held quarterly and as needed. Social worker #7 receives a list monthly of residents whose care plans meeting are due. They usually have the meetings on Tuesday. An invite is sent the week beforehand to the responsible party (RP) and resident. They set-up a time either on the phone or in person. Therapy, Activities, Social Services and the resident's Responsible party usually attends the meetings and Nursing will come if available. Afterwards they sign the attendance form. Social worker #7 advised she is working on getting all the care plan meetings done.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the medication administration audit record (MAAR) and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to document after administering medications to residents. This was evident for 1 (Residents #32) of 6 residents reviewed for timely medication administration. The findings include: The surveyor reviewed the MAARs for Resident #32 on 3/7/24 at 2:07 PM for the period of 3/1/24 to 3/6/24. The MAAR is a document that shows the time that a medication is documented as being administered when staff documents it in the computer. Upon review of the MAAR, Resident #32's medications were documented as administered late. The surveyor interviewed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #23) on 3/6/24 at 3:50 PM, who was identified as documenting medication administration late. During the interview, when asked about medication administration for Resident #32 on 3/4/24, they had omeprazole scheduled for 8:00 AM and the documented administration time in the MAAR was 3/4/24 at 11:44 AM. LPN #23 stated the resident did get their medication on time, it is usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) ensure that a resident (#5) received a scheduled dose of medication as ordered by the physician; 2.) ensure medications were signed off on the controlled drug receipt/disposition form after being administered to a resident (#10). This was evident during a medication drug storage review and narcotic review and reconciliation for 1 of 3 medication carts; and 3) administer scheduled medications to residents at the physician ordered time (Resident #32, Resident #23, Resident #42). This was evident for 3 (Residents #32, #23, #42) of 6 residents reviewed during a medication administration observation Findings include: 1. During a review of a medication cart on the Osprey Unit with nurse (#27), a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 3/7/24 at 2:30 PM, the following concerns were identified while reviewing the narcotic drawer: a. The nurse counted the medication blister pack of Tramadol Tablet 50 mg for Resident # 5. There were 7 pills observed inside of the blister pack. At that time the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the physician failed to evaluate a resident with a change in condition in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #24) during the survey. The findings include: During observation rounds on Quail Unit on 3/4/24 at 9am, Resident #24 stated, s/he had a terrible a sore throat. S/he stated, I told the nurse. During a follow up visit on 3/5/24 at 10am the resident stated, My throat is still sore, and I want to see the doctor. This surveyor observed the Nurse Practitioner (NP) (staff # 21) sitting at the desk on Quail Unit at 10:15am on 3/5/24. This surveyor informed staff #21 of the resident complaint. She stated, I will add the resident to my list of residents to see. On 3/6/24 at 10:30am during an interview with the Unit Manager (staff #14) she was asked why the resident complaint of sore throat was not addressed on 3/4/24. She stated that Resident #24 did not tell the nurse that s/he had a sore throat. On 3/5/24 at 1pm during an interview with the NP staff #21 stated she was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication administration observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% during the medication observation facility task. This was evident for 5 of 27 medications administered during the observation which resulted in an error rate of 18.52%. The findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation that took place on 3/6/24 at 10:38 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #23) administer medications to Resident #32. The medications included one capsule of Omeprazole 20mg (milligrams) and one puff of Fluticasone-Salmeterol 250-50 mcg/act (micrograms/actuation). LPN #23 failed to provide instructions to Resident #32 regarding rinsing the mouth after administration, and Resident #32 did not rinse his/her mouth after receiving the dose. Review of the medical record on 3/6/24 at 11:31 AM for Resident #32 revealed a physician order dated 1/30/23 for Fluticasone-Salmeterol 250-50 MCG/ACT Aerosol Powder, breath activated, Give 1 puff by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication administration observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to adhere to infection control practices and guidelines to prevent and control transmission of infectious agents during medication administration. This was evident for 2 of 27 medications administered during the medication administration observation. The findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation that took place on 3/6/24 at 10:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #23) was observed dispensing Resident #42's medications, Seroquel 50mg and Celexa 10mg, into a medication cup, putting both tablets into a pill crusher located on top of the medication cart, crushing the tablets together, and pouring the crushed medications into a different medication cup filled with pudding. During this process, LPN #23 stated she crushes both medications together and mixes them with pudding because if she does not, Resident #42 will spit them out. The surveyor did not observe the nurse clean the tablet crusher after its use nor for the remainder of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to offer and administer the pneumococcal vaccine to a resident. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#40) in 5 resident records reviewed for immunizations during the survey. The findings include: According to the Center for Disease Control website, there are certain risk conditions that warrant an individual to receive the pneumonia vaccine for adults ages of 19 - [AGE] years of age. These conditions are but not limited to alcoholism or cigarette smoking, chronic liver disease, Diabetes Mellitus, chronic heart disease (including CHF & cardiomyopathies), decreased immune function from disease or drugs, and chronic lung disease, including COPD, emphysema, and asthma. On 03/07/24 at 4:50 pm the surveyor reviewed the facility's immunization report which revealed Resident #40 received the Pneumococcal Conjugate 13 vaccine on 06/26/12. The surveyor reviewed the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) which revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined that facility's food service employees failed to ensure that equipment was maintained and safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 4/22/2019 at 8:34 AM, an initial tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: 1. The paper towel dispenser for the hand sink adjacent to the gas stove was observed without any towels available to dry washed hands. 2. Empty plastic wrappers, trash and an open saltine cracker packet were observed on the floor of the dry goods storage room. The Director of Food Service and Administrator were made aware of these findings on 4/25/2019.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to honor a resident's choices (Resident #16). This was evident for 1 out of 40 residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: During interview with Resident #16 on 4/24/19 at 12:20 PM, he/she stated he/she would like to receive snacks daily but the facility staff do not always provide. Review of the resident's medical record revealed on 4/15/19 the resident was seen by the dietitian. At that time the dietitian documented, Family is requesting resident receives between meal snacks due to hunger complaints. Nurse made aware. Further review of the medical record revealed no physician order for snacks. After surveyor intervention, the facility staff obtained the following physician order on 4/25/19: Resident may have afternoon and every evening snack. Per resident request. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 4/25/19 at 12:50 PM confirmed the surveyor's findings.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation during the initial tour of the facility it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. The findings include: 1. On 4/22/2019 at 10:29 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have dried stains on the floor and on feeding tube equipment present in the room. 2. On 4/23/2019 at 8:57 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed having crumbs on the floor by the closet. The crumbs had been observed during the initial tour on 4/22/2019 at 10:29 AM. The bedside table was observed with old, dried spills on the table legs. The Director of Nursing and Director of Maintenance were made aware of these findings on 4/29/2019.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to notify a resident's representative in writing of a transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 3 of 40 residents (Resident #23, Resident #53, Resident #66) reviewed during survey investigation. The findings include: Resident #23's medical record was reviewed on 4/23/2019. This review revealed that Resident #23 was transferred to the hospital on 3/19/2019. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that Resident #23's representative was given written notice of the transfer. Resident #53's medical record was reviewed on 4/25/2019. This review revealed that Resident #53 was transferred to the hospital on 4/2/2019. There was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that Resident #53's representative was given written notice of the transfer. Resident #66's medical record was reviewed on 4/23/2019. This review revealed that Resident #66 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans with measurable goals. This was evident for 2 of 40 residents (Residents #37 and #53) reviewed during survey investigation. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Care Plans are comprised of a Focus, Outcome and Interventions/Tasks to help guide care for residents. 1.) On 4/26/2019 a review of Resident #37's Care Plan revealed an Outcome that stated Resident on hospice, weight maintenance is top priority. This Outcome was written on 2/18/2019 by the facility Dietician. Hospice is a specialized type of care for residents whom doctors estimate have 6 months or less to live. Further review of the medical record revealed a progress note from 3/5/2019 that stated the resident was no longer on hospice care as of 2/12/2019. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed on 4/26/2019 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for no weights, vitals or labs for a resident. This was evident for 1 of 40 residents (Resident #37) reviewed during the survey investigation. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 on 4/25/2019 revealed a current physician order for No wts (weights), V/S (vitals) or labs created on 1/29/2018. Further review of the medical record showed that Resident #37's weight was taken on 4/8/2019. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed on 4/26/2019. The ADON stated that the weight on 4/8/2019 was taken as a baseline measurement after Resident #37 was removed from hospice care. However, review of the medical record on 4/26/19 established that Resident #37 was removed from hospice care on 2/12/2019. The Director of Nursing and Administrator were made aware of these findings on 4/26/2019. See F 656

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to follow the recommendations of the dietitian. This was evident for 1 out of 40 residents (Resident #44) reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was seen by the dietitian on 3/9/19 for weight loss. The dietitian documented at that time, Weight loss noted, supplement in place and appetite stimulant ordered. Recommend resident started on fortified foods and bi-weekly weights to monitor closely. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the resident was ordered fortified foods but the resident was not weighed again until 4/1/19, not biweekly as recommended. Further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was in the hospital from [DATE] until 4/19/19. On 4/19/19 the physician ordered a regular puree texture diet. On 4/20/19 the resident was seen by the dietitian who documented, Registered dietitian to recommend patient continues to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain medical records in the most accurate form for a resident. This was evident for 1 of 40 residents (Resident #61) reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed the Resident had a physician order on 4/18/19 for laboratory tests (CBC, CMP, Lipid Panel, TSH and Uric Acid) to be completed on 4/23/19. Further review of the Resident's medical record on 4/29/19 at 9:18 AM with Assistant Director of Nursing revealed the laboratory tests results were not in the medical record. After surveyor intervention, the Assistant Director of Nursing was able to obtain the results of the laboratory tests and included them in the medical record on 4/29/19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROSENBERG, MINDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 03/18/2025
200 MORGNEC RD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2018
ROSENBERG, ZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2018
FLEURANCOIS, NANCYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SEITZ, STEWARTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 15%Other / private 7%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,157per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215262. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next