No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maryland Masonic Homes LTD

300 International Circle, Cockeysville, MD 21030 · Non profit - Corporation · 88 certified beds · (410) 527-1111 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 527-1111 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jun 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,420 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,420 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-21)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
126 Shawan Rd · (410) 771-8380 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
11399 York Rd · (410) 785-1065 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Quevos0.4 mi
122 Shawan Rd
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.7%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%22.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.3%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.7%16.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.4%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.0%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.1%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.0%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.581.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.071.201.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 381 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

67.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.52U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF67.2%CMS range 62.5–71.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.7%CMS range 11.3–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting90.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.5–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.02
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.91
RN hoursweekends
32.3%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 68.0 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-02)
31
at the previous standard inspection (2021-05-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

66 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow the standard of practice of verifying medication doses when ordering and administering medication. This was evident during the review of a facility reported incident where a resident was administered an inappropriate dose of morphine. This was evident for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed (#1) for deaths. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. The date of correction was [DATE]. The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident on [DATE] at 11:30 AM revealed concerns regarding the medication administered to Resident #1 was noted with a decline during his/her stay in the facility. Resident #1 was ordered Ativan for agitation on [DATE] secondary to increased oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaint #2979118, resident records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice when ordering medications for newly admitted residents. This was found to be evident for 1 (#78) out of 1 resident reviewed for medications during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 06/25/2026 at 1:07 PM, the surveyor reviewed complaint #2979118. Complaint #2979118 indicated that when Resident #78 was admitted to the facility, he/she was denied medications for over seven hours.On 06/30/2026 at 7:20 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident record review. During the resident record review, progress note, dated 3/12/26, revealed that Resident #78 arrived at the facility on 03/12/2026 at 7:49 PM.On 06/30/2026 at 7:25 AM, the surveyor conducted a resident record review. During the resident record review, Resident #78's N Adv - Clinical admission form, dated 3/12/26, revealed that Resident #78's clinical admission was completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff adherence to appropriate infection control measures consistent with accepted standards of practices during: 1) medication administration for 1 (Resident #26) out of 4 resident observations of medication administration; 2) equipment cleaning between resident use for 1 (Resident #63) out of 4 resident observations of medication administration; 3) staff performance of hand hygiene for 1 (Resident #20) out of 2 residents reviewed for accidents; and 4) the facility failed to ensure measures to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the building water system by having a documented water management program which has the potential to impact all residents. The findings include: 1) During observation rounds and staff interviews: On 5/28/25 at 1:40PM the surveyor observed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage was present and posted on the door to Resident #26's room that indicated a minimum mandatory standard: Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper storage with regards to reconciling expired medications and storing all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments. This was evident for 3 of 3 medication storage areas observed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During observation rounds and staff interviews the following was found: On 5/28/25 at 1:57PM at the Baltimore hall #2 treatment cart to review the narcotic count log book with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6, the surveyor observed the Oxycodone tab 5mg medication pack for Resident #33 which had an expiration date of 4/30/25. The surveyor asked LPN #6 if the item was expired, and LPN #6 confirmed the expired date. On 6/2/25 at 10:40AM with Unit Manager #11 in the Baltimore hall medication supply room, two SURESITE IV slide safety intravenous catheter, size 2G ¾ syringes with expiration date of 8/31/24. The surveyor asked Unit Manager #11 if item was expired;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) ensure the menu was followed, and 2.) meet resident choices based on his/her preferences. This was evident for: 1.) 7 out of 7 residents who had ordered bread sticks on their menu for the lunch meal occurring on 5/29/25 and 2.) 1 (Resident #5) out of 2 residents reviewed for food during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1.) On 5/29/25 at 12:21PM the surveyor conducted a meal tray observation which revealed a menu ticket on a meal tray in which bread sticks were selected as an option, however they were not served on the meal tray. At this time, the surveyor requested a dual observation of the concern with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #28, who observed the meal tray, and acknowledged and confirmed understanding of the concern. On 5/29/25 at 12:27PM the surveyor observed CDM #28 approach the hot food cart and open it, and confirmed the bread sticks were not brought up from the kitchen to the unit. At this time, the surveyor conducted an interview with CDM #28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) received at least 12 hours of in-service training annually. This was evident for 3 (GNAs #16, 17, and 18) out of 3 GNA's reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 5/30/25 at 3:30PM, a personnel record review revealed that GNA #16, 17, and 18 did not receive the required, annual, 12-hour, nurse aide, in-service training. On 5/30/25 at 3:35PM, Human Resources Director (HRD) #12 was interviewed. During the interview, HRD #12 was made aware that there was no documentation indicating that GNA's #16, 17, and 18 received the required, annual, 12-hour, nurse aide, in-service training. HRD #12 indicated that the Nursing and Health Services Educator, Infection Prevention Nurse (RN, IP) #4 manages documentation of the required, annual, 12-hour, nurse aide, in-service training. On 5/30/25 at 3:42PM, RN, IP #4 was interviewed. During the interview, the surveyor made RN, IP #4 aware that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure maintenance of a homelike environment. This was evident for 3 (#30, #13, and #22) out of 18 resident's rooms observed during the surveyor's initial tour during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During observation rounds the following was found: On 5/27/25 at 8:09AM in the room of Resident #30, the surveyor observed damage to the wall area adjacent to the resident bed just outside of the bathroom. The wall appeared with scratches and peeling and flaking of paint. On 5/27/25 at 8:19AM in the bathroom of Resident #13, the surveyor observed paint damage, brown streaking to the surrounding wall, and crumbling wall fragments to the base of the toilet where it meets the wall. On 05/27/25 at 8:28AM in the room of Resident #22, the surveyor observed the wall to the head of the resident bed area with scratches and peeling and flaking paint. During staff interview on 5/28/25 10:10 AM the surveyor discussed with Maintenance Supervisor #26, the paint that is peeling, flaking, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was monitored for side effects of psychotropic medications. This was evident for 1 (Resident #50) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 5/28/25 at 8:46AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #50 which revealed active medical orders for the following medications: trazodone (antidepressant/sedative), buspirone (anxiolytic), and zyprexa (atypical antipsychotic) with no side effect monitoring order observed to be in place. On 5/28/25 at 9:16AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #50 which included the May 2025 medication and treatment administration records which revealed there was no medication side effect monitoring present for the trazodone, buspirone, or zyprexa medications. On 5/28/25 at 9:36AM the surveyor conducted an interview and shared their concern regarding Resident #50 with Unit Manager, Registered Nurse #11 who reported to the surveyor that during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was timely reported. This was evident for 1 (#MD00212201) out of 3 facility reported incidents reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 5/29/25 at 8:47AM the surveyor requested and reviewed the facility's complete investigation file for facility reported incident #MD00212201. Review of the complete investigation file revealed the following information: 1.) a statement written by the Director of Social Services #7 dated 11/26/24 which documented allegations of abuse verbalized to them by Resident #269, 2.) an initial self report submitted by the facility on 11/26/24 which documented that facility staff became aware of the incident at 2:00PM with physical abuse as the type of allegation being reported, and 3.) an email confirmation of submission of the initial self report made to the Office of Health Care Quality on 11/26/24 at 4:10PM. Review of the complete investigation file and initial self report documentation revealed the self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (#MD00212201) out of 3 facility reported incidents reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 5/29/25 at 8:47AM the surveyor requested and reviewed the facility's complete investigation file for facility reported incident #MD00212201. Review of the complete investigation file revealed a statement written by the Director of Social Services #7 dated 11/26/24 which documented allegations of abuse verbalized to them by Resident #269, which included both allegations of physical and verbal abuse. Review of the interviews conducted revealed that staff members were questioned regarding the allegation of physical abuse, however, there were no documented questions to staff regarding the allegations made of verbal abuse. Review of the complete investigative file revealed there was no documentation of an interview conducted or statement obtained from the alleged perpetrator, and no written statement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise a quarterly comprehensive care plan by all interdisciplinary team members. This was evident for 1 (Resident #21) out of 1 residents reviewed for care planning during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record by the surveyor on 5/28/25 at 9:55AM revealed a progress note stating that a quarterly care plan meeting and review was completed for Resident #21 on 3/4/25 by the interdisciplinary team, but did not include the attending physician and a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident. During an interview on 5/28/25 at 2:07PM, Director of Social Services #7 confirmed and stated that the attending doctor and a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident did not review or revise Resident #21's 3/4/25 quarterly care plan. On 6/2/25 at approximately 3:30PM the surveyor reviewed the concern during the facility's exit conference with the Administrator and Director of Nursing.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 55 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to take measures to ensure a resident was free from accident hazards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #20) out of 2 residents reviewed for accidents during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 5/27/25 at 10:38AM the surveyor observed Resident #20 from the hallway to be laying on their back in their bed which was in a flat position and also in the highest position, with a hoyer sling situated under them and their foley catheter bag laying on top of their right thigh. No staff was observed by the surveyor to be present within the resident's room or within the hallway. On 5/27/25 at 10:40AM the surveyor conducted an interview of Resident #20 who reported to the surveyor that their nursing assistant had left to get something and they had been laying there for five minutes. Resident #20 stated to the surveyor: It makes me feel helpless. On 5/27/25 at 10:42AM the surveyor requested a dual observation with the resident's assigned nurse. On 5/27/25 at 10:43AM the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper reconciliation of expired controlled drug medications during medication administration and drug record keeping for the resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #33) out of 6 residents reviewed for medication storage during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During observation rounds and resident record review on [DATE] at 1:57PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6, the surveyor reviewed the narcotic count log book and the narcotic medications on-hand within the lock box where they are stored. The surveyor observed Resident #33's Oxycodone TAB 5mg medication card and noted an expiration date located on the back of the card, which revealed the medication was expired as of [DATE]. The surveyor then reviewed the controlled drug receipt/record/disposition form within the narcotic count log book which revealed that Oxycodone 5mg Tab was given to the resident on [DATE] by Registered Nurse (RN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow prescriber's orders and manufacturer's specifications regarding medication preparation during medication administration for the resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #13) out of 4 residents observed for medication administration during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During observation rounds for medication administration on 5/28/25 at 8:56AM the surveyor observed Registered Nurse #5 prepare Resident #13's medications using a white eating utensil spoon not labeled with measurements to scoop 2 scoops out of a bulk Benefiber bottle, to mix in a measured cup prior to adding liquid. During surveyor review of Resident #13's medical record on 5/28/25 at 9:00AM the record revealed the following physician's medication order: Benefiber powder (Wheat Dextrin) Give 1 packet by mouth one time a day for diarrhea Dissolve contents in 8 ounces of liquid; Benefiber powder ADMINISTER 2 TEASPOONSFUL BY MOUTH ONE TIME A DAY FOR DIARRHEA DISSOLVE CONTENTS IN 8 OUNCES…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and separate storage of food brought in by family or visitors for residents. This was evident for 1 out of 2 Central Supply Room refrigerators observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: During observation rounds the following was found: On 6/2/25 at 11:00AM with Unit Manager (UM) #11 within the Central Supply room located on Baltimore Hall #2, the surveyor observed 3 of 6 containers of smoked salmon cream cheese spread, with an expiration date of 5/18/25. On 6/2/25 at 11:02AM with UM #11 within the central supply room located on Baltimore hall #2, the surveyor observed 2 of 2 white soup containers of liquid with visitor label dated [DATE]. On 6/2/25 at 11:04AM with UM #11 within the central supply room located on Baltimore hall #2, the surveyor observed 2 of 2 containers of cottage cheese with fruit, with the expiration date: 4/7/25. On 6/2/25 at 11:06AM with UM #11 within the central supply room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility document review and interview, it was determined that the facility administration failed to follow the guidelines for abuse investigation which included conducting complete and thorough investigations, identifying abuse and putting in appropriate interventions to prevent further occurrences of abuse. These failures placed all residents at risk for abuse. This was evident for 4 of 4 (#6, #7, #2 and #10) facility reported incidents reviewed completed by the previous facility Director of Nursing. The findings include: 1. Review on 10/17/24 at 11:55 AM of the FRI regarding Resident #6 an allegation of verbal abuse revealed that residents' family member reported to the (previous) facility DON, staff # 18, on 6/14/24 that staff were rude when delivering residents breakfast trays. The concern was further noted that staff would leave the breakfast trays in front of the resident and then would not assist the resident right away with eating. Record review at 12:30 PM on 10/17/24 revealed that Resident #6 was dependent on staff for meals and eating as noted in his/her care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to enhance a resident's dignity. This was evident during the review of a facility reported incident regarding activities of daily living care 2 of 30 (#6, R4). This failure placed residents at risk of their rights being violated and not upheld. The findings include: 1.) Review of the facility reported incident (FRI) on 10/17/24 at 11:55 AM regarding Resident #6 and an allegation of verbal abuse revealed that residents' family member reported to the (previous) facility Director of Nursing (DON) # 18 staff were rude when delivering residents breakfast trays. The concern was further clarified that staff would leave the breakfast trays in front of the resident and then would not assist the resident right away with eating. Record review at 12:30 PM on 10/17/24 revealed that Resident #6 was dependent on staff for meals and eating as noted in his/her care plan and in the daily nursing progress notes. Per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interview with staff it was determine the facility staff failed to ensure that allegations involving abuse were reported to the Administrator of the facility and the State Agency no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made and results of all investigations were reported within 5 working days. This was evident in 3 of 26 (#6, #2 and #10) facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility reported incident (FRI) regarding Resident #6 and an allegation of verbal abuse on 10/17/24 at 11:55 AM revealed that residents' family member reported to the (previous) facility Director of Nursing (DON) #18 on 6/14/24 that staff were rude when delivering residents breakfast trays. The concern was further noted that staff would also leave the breakfast trays in front of the resident and then would not assist the resident right away with eating. On 6/20/24 a care plan meeting was held. That same family member, Resident #6's representative, asked the DON what the follow-up was to his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate allegations related to potential abuse and injuries of unknown origin. This was evident during the review of 5 of 30 (#4, #6, #7, #10, #25 ) incidents requiring facility reports and investigations. The findings include: 1. Review of the FRI regarding Resident #6 and allegation of verbal abuse on 10/17/24 at 11:55 AM revealed that residents' family member reported to the (previous) facility Director of Nursing (DON) # 18 on 6/14/24 that staff were rude when delivering residents breakfast trays. The concern was further noted that staff would leave the breakfast trays in front of the resident and then would not assist the resident right away with eating. Record review at 12:30 PM on 10/17/24 revealed that Resident #6 was dependent on staff for meals and eating as noted in his/her care plan and in the daily nursing progress notes. On 6/20/24 a care plan meeting was held. That same family member, Resident #6's representative, asked the DON what the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to appropriately review a medication order and administer medication according to professional standards. This was evident for 1 of 3 facility reported incidents reviewed regarding medication management (Resident #1). The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident for Resident #1 on [DATE] at 11:30 AM revealed that Resident #1 was administered 10 x the ordered dose of Morphine. Further review of the incident report revealed that the medication order was taken as a verbal order on [DATE] at approximately 3pm by RN #7. The order was intended for a concentration of 20mg/ml of morphine to administer a dose of .25ml every 2 hours as needed for a dose of 5mg of Morphine. However, RN #7 transcribed the order as 2.5ml. When the medication arrived, the controlled drug receipt/record disposition form showed that the concentration of the Morphine was 20mg/ml. According to the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure adequate supervision while positioning a resident in bed during the provision of care. This deficient practice resulted in the Resident #17 falling out of bed. This was evident for 1 (17) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. The findings include: On 10/17/24, a record review was conducted which revealed that Resident #17 had diagnoses which included myalgia, osteoarthritis, pain and quadriplegia. Quadriplegia is paralysis that affects all a person's limbs. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a screening tool that is utilized to ensure each resident's individual needs are identified. A review of the MDS assessment, with an assessment reference date of 07/7/2023, identified that to turn from side to side and position body when in bed, the resident was totally dependent on staff for the activity and required 2 staff persons to physically assist. According to facility notes dated 9/29/23 at 12:30 PM, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight loss and nutritional status. This was evident for 1 of 30 (resident #30) residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings includes: On 3/27/24, the State of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a complaint which alleged the facility failed to monitor resident #30's status and well-being during his/her stay in the facility. Review of resident #30's medical record on 10/17/24 at 8:11 am revealed the resident was ordered to be weighed monthly. The resident's weight on 6/14/22 was 124 lbs. The resident's weight on 7/2/22 was 104 lbs. Review of the nutritional assessment on 8/4/22 revealed the assessment was done after the resident was transferred to a local hospital after a fall on 7/4/22 that caused a laceration to the resident's forehead. The resident's weight had increased to 108.4 lbs. after the hospital stay. The assessment also revealed that the resident was given a PEG tube, a feeding tube that used to provide nutrition to residents that are unable to eat or cannot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review of a facility reported incident and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to address residents pain. This was evident for 2 of 5 (#1 and #17) residents reviewed for incidents of injuries with pain. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility reported incident (FRI) on 10/16/24 at 11:30 AM for Resident #1 revealed a noted change in condition identified by the RN on duty staff #5, that was sent to the on-call provider, MD, staff #21. RN #5 reported that Resident was exhibiting signs and symptoms of pain and discomfort, continually removing his/her oxygen and has episodes of agonal breathing .no longer eating or drinking. Is it possible to have an order for Morphine or some type of narcotic pain killer to keep him/her comfortable? This was sent on 8/7/24 at 11:31 AM under urgency -1 hour. At 11:42 AM on 8/7/24, MD staff #21, responded Please reach out to CRNP #7 as she is the first point of contact in E-medical. The concern and change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0713 — isolated
    Provide or arrange emergency care by a doctor 24 hours a day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review of a facility reported incident and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician was responsive to the emergency needs of residents on a 24-hour basis. This was evident during the review of 1 of 5 (#1) incidents where the physician was contacted after hours. The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident (FRI) on 10/16/24 at 11:30 AM for Resident #1 revealed a noted change in condition identified by the RN on duty, staff #5, that was sent to the on-call provider, MD, staff #21. RN staff #5 reported that Resident was exhibiting signs and symptoms of pain and discomfort, continually removing his/her oxygen and has episodes of agonal breathing .no longer eating or drinking. Is it possible to have an order for Morphine or some type of narcotic pain killer to keep him/her comfortable? This was sent on 8/7/24 at 11:31 AM under urgency -1 hour. At 11:42 AM on 8/7/24, MD staff #21, responded Please reach out to staff CRNP #7 as she is the first point of contact in E-medical. The concern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0715 — isolated
    Ensure the physician properly assigns and delegates tasks to a qualified dietitian (or other qualified nutrition professional); or to a qualified therapist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, a facility provider failed to refer a resident's case to a dietitian when the resident required additional supplementation (resident #30). This was evident for 1 of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings includes: On 3/27/24, the State of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a complaint which alleged the facility failed to monitor resident #30's status and well-being during his/her stay in the facility. Review of resident #30's medical record on 10/17/24 at 8:11am revealed the resident was ordered to be weighed monthly. The resident's weight on 6/14/22 was 124 lbs. The resident's weight on 7/2/22 was 104 lbs. Review of the nutritional assessment on 8/4/22 revealed the assessment was done as part of readmission protocols after the resident was readmitted to the facility after being transferred to a local hospital after a fall on 7/4/22. The resident's weight had increased to 108.4 lbs. after the hospital stay. The assessment also revealed that the resident was given a PEG tube, a feeding tube that used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespread
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person centered care plans that were resident specific, with measurable objectives and goals. This was evident for 8 (#57, #25, #31, #54, #369, #9, #36, #26) of 35 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) Review of Resident #57's medical record on 5/5/21at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of the facility's kitchen food services, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service equipment in a manner that ensures sanitary food service operations. This was identified while observing the facility's dish washing machine in operation. The findings include. During the initial environmental kitchen food services inspection on 5/3/21, the Certified Dietary Manager (Staff # 12) in charge of the kitchen revealed that the facility was utilizing disposable dishware as the facility was currently in a COVID-19 outbreak. The trays that held the disposable dishware were the only items for washing in the dish washing machine. Observations were made, on 5/7/21 at 9:45 AM, of the cleaning of trays in the dish washing machine by 2 dietary staff (staff #23 and #24) who were operating the dish washer machine. Observations of the temperature gauges on top of the machine showed one gauge to register 130 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the other gauge shown to be at 140 degrees F. Staff should ensure that dishwasher temperatures are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-05-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to revise and document an accurate up-to-date facility-wide assessment. This was evident during review of the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task of the annual survey. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: A facility-wide assessment is conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is to include the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. A copy of the facility assessment was requested at the initiation of the survey on 5/3/21. The facility assessment was requested again on 5/11/21. Review of the facility assessment on 5/12/21, revealed the date of assessment or update was documented as 5/5/21. As of 5/5/21, there was a continuation of a Maryland state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-13 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 3 (#54, #71, #36) of 35 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) Observation was made on 5/3/21 at 2:29 PM, of Resident #54 lying in bed receiving oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula. A nasal cannula is a small, flexible tube that contains two open prongs intended to sit just inside the nostrils. Review of Resident #54's medical record on 5/4/21 at 8:49 AM revealed a physician's order from 4/21/21 to 5/3/21 to titrate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to meet professional standards by 1) failing to follow the 5 rights of medication administration by not confirming a resident's name prior to the administration of medications, 2) failing to offer water to a resident taking 8 medications, 3) documenting that a medication was administered when it was not observed to be administered, 4) documenting that a resident was receiving oxygen continuously when the resident was not using oxygen, 5) documenting that TED stockings were worn when they were not observed on the resident, 6) failing to follow physician's orders for blood pressure medications that had parameters for administration, and 7) documenting the administration of a pain medication that was not removed from the supply, and staff removal of a dose of narcotic pain medication from resident supply without documentation of the medication administration. This was found to be evident for 6 (#57, #49,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan as evidenced by: 1) failure to follow a physician order to obtain vital signs every shift for 7 days; 2) failure to ensure a heart rate was obtained and recorded when a medication with ordered parameters was administered; 3) failure to provide assistance with meals as indicated by the nursing assessment and included as an intervention in the care plan; 4) failure to administer pain medication as ordered for a resident with a broken hip on at least 13 occasions over a 26 day period; and 5) failure to have a system in place to ensure that weekly weights were obtained as ordered and that the registered dietitian addressed significant weight loss when it was identified and 6) failed to provide TED stockings as prescribed and then documented that the treatments were provided. This was found to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-13 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians reviewed the resident's total plan of care, completed, and signed orders during each visit; and ensure that the primary care physician's notes were placed in the resident's medical record in a timely manner This was found to be evident for 4 out of 25 residents (Resident #9, #26, #8, #22) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) On 5/10/21, review of Resident #9's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted in 2020 and whose diagnoses included but were not limited to arthritis, heart disease and dementia. The resident [NAME] dependent on g-tube feeding for all nutritional intake. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident was currently receiving therapy services. a) On 5/10/21 at 11:56 AM, the Rehab Director (Staff #29) reported that the resident was receiving physical therapy services. Surveyor expressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff demonstrated competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. All residents can be affected as competency skill sets should be based on resident care, safety and services delivered. The findings include: Competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs includes, but is not limited to, competencies in areas such as; resident rights, person centered care, communication, basic nursing skills, basic restorative services, skin and wound care, medication management, pain management, Infection control, identification of changes in condition, and cultural competency. As required under F838, the facility's assessment must address/include an evaluation of staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. The facility failed to adequately address what competencies were required of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication administration observation, medical record and facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 3 (#57, #49, #44) of 4 residents observed with 3 errors out of 27 medication administration opportunities which resulted in an error rate of 11.11% by 2 licensed practical nurses (LPN #3, LPN #4) and 1 certified medicine aide (CMA #5) that were observed during medication administration during an annual survey. The findings include: 1) Observation was made of the medication administration to Resident #57 on 5/5/21 at 7:58 AM by LPN #3. LPN #3 administered Olopatadine, 2 eye drops in each eye to Resident #57. Review of the physician's order revealed only 1 drop was to be given in each eye. 2) Observation was made of the medication administration to Resident #49 on 5/5/21at 8:25 AM by LPN #4. LPN #4 was observed dispensing medications from the blister packets into a medication cup. LPN #4 dispensed Preservision, Vitamin D3, Gabapentin, Carvedilol, and (2) 100 mg.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of significant medication errors as evidenced by the nursing staff's 1) failure to hold a blood pressure medication when the blood pressure values were outside of the parameters to administer the medication and 2) failure to administer a blood pressure medication when the parameters indicated the medication should be administered. This was evident 2 (#369, #31) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The findings include: Blood pressure is a measurement of the pressure that the blood places on the arteries as it is moving through the arteries. The top number is the systolic pressure, which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart pumps the blood out into the arteries. The bottom number is the diastolic pressure which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart is between beats (resting). 1) Review of the medical record for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form and failed to ensure that geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) documentation was readily accessible. This was evident for 8 (#15, #25, #31, #57, #54, #169, #9, #22) of 35 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official document for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 5/10/21 at 8:00 AM, review of facility reported incident MD00159407 revealed that Resident #15 had a large discoloration to the left chest area of unknown origin that was found on 10/16/20. The facility did an investigation and the NP (nurse practitioner) ordered to monitor the bruising. Review of Resident #15's medical record failed to reveal documentation that the responsible party was made aware of the bruising. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program by 1) failing to follow infection prevention and control guidelines by not keeping the doors closed of isolated residents on droplet and contact precautions, 2) failing to ensure that staff utilized personal protective equipment (PPE) in a manner that met minimum standards and minimized risk for infectious spread and, 3) failing to ensure that signage was outside of each resident's room who was on isolation indicating all types of isolation the resident was on, and what PPE was required prior to entering the room. Failing to utilize proper infection control signage was identified for 2 (Resident #172, #56) of 35 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The interrelated, noncompliant practices within the facility's infection prevention and control program left all residents, staff, and visitors at increased risk for harm during a declared health pandemic and during an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-13 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure residents' COVID test results were kept in the residents' medical records. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #26, #25) of 2 residents reviewed for COVID-19 during the annual survey, but was determined to be a facility wide practice. The findings include: 1) On 5/7/21, review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an order on 4/22/21 for a COVID test. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal the results of this test. On 5/7/21 at 2:04 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the COVID test results were not presently kept in the residents' medical record. She went on to report that there was a portal to the lab where the results could be accessed, but confirmed that not all staff had access to this portal. She reported that she was currently working on linking the lab portal with [name of electronic health record system]. The concern regarding failure to ensure that COVID test results were kept in resident's medical record was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of blood pressure readings outside of physician ordered parameters. This was evident for 2 (Resident #369, #31) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during an annual survey. The findings include: Blood pressure is a measurement of the pressure that the blood places on the arteries as it is moving through the arteries. The top number is the systolic pressure, which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart pumps the blood out into the arteries. The bottom number is the diastolic pressure which is a measurement of the pressure when the heart is between beats (resting). 1) Review of Resident #369's April 2021 physician's orders on 5/5/21 at 10:40 AM revealed an order for Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 25 mg., give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day for HTN (hypertension). Hold for BP (blood pressure) less than 110/60 or HR (heart rate) less than 60. The physician also ordered Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. every morning for edema (also treats high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with the facility's staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide notice to residents informing them that Medicare may deny payments for procedures or treatments and that residents may be personally responsible for full payment. This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification during the survey (Resident #4 and #65). The findings include: An Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) is a written notice from Medicare, given to residents before receiving certain items or services notifying beneficiaries that Medicare may deny payment for that specific procedure or treatment. An ABN gives residents the opportunity to accept or refuse the items or services and protects them from unexpected financial liability in cases where Medicare denies payment. 1. On 05/05/2021 at 2:43 PM, Resident # 4's Beneficiary Protection and Notification was conducted. This review revealed that Resident #4's last covered day for skilled nursing services was on 02/05/2021. There was no evidence in the resident's record to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, it was determined that facility staff failed to promote care for a resident in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and privacy. This was evident for 2 (#54, #25) of 2 residents observed on the COVID unit during the annual survey. The findings include: Observation was made, on 5/3/21 at 2:34 PM on the COVID unit of, Resident #54 and Resident #25 lying in bed in the same room. The COVID unit consisted of rooms with residents that were on contact and droplet isolation precautions. There were no privacy curtains observed in the room. A second observation was made on 5/4/21 at 1:50 PM. There were no privacy curtains in the room. Staff #8 (geriatric nursing assistant) GNA and Staff #9 (LPN) were giving personal hygiene care to Resident #25 and Resident #54 without providing privacy to each of the residents. On 5/6/21 at 9:50 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff #15, the Director of EVS (Environmental Services). Staff #15 was asked if there was a specific reason why a privacy curtain would not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, facility investigation documentation and interview, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was reported to the survey and certification agency and 2) failed to report allegations of abuse within 2 hours of the allegation to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was found to be evident for 1 out of three residents (Resident #169) reviewed for accidents and for 2 (#15, #120) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #169, who was unable to provide information to staff due to dementia, was found on the floor with significant injuries on two separate occasions by staff. On the second occasion, the resident was found by the night time supervisor during routine rounds on the floor several feet away from their bed (despite the presence of a bed alarm). On 5/12/21, review of Resident #169's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incident investigations and interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This was evident for 2 (#120, #121) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) Review of facility reported incident MD00135677 for Resident #120 on 5/10/21 at 2:25 PM revealed the resident reported that a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) came into Resident #120's room at 6:00 AM and asked Resident #120 if he/she was wet. Resident #120 stated that he/she was not wet, however the GNA proceeded to place his hand on Resident #120's brief. The facility determined that the GNA violated the resident's right to consent for care before it was given and terminated the GNA from the facility. On 5/10/21 at 2:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if there was a documented investigation. The DON stated that the incident happened prior to her becoming the DON and there was nothing else in the file. The DON stated she would look to see if there was any other documentation. At that time, the employee's file was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was identified for 1 (#54) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include. 1) Review of Resident #54's medical record on 5/4/21 at 8:41 AM revealed the resident had vomited, had chills, an elevated temperature and a change in mental status. The physician was notified and ordered for the resident to be sent to the hospital via 911. There was no documentation as to what interventions were put into place before the ambulance arrived, what the resident was told and if the resident understood where he/she was going and why. LPN #13 reviewed the electronic and paper medical record with the surveyor on 5/10/21 at 12:57 PM and confirmed that there was no documentation. The Director of Nursing was informed on 5/11/21 at 8:36 AM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with staff and a resident, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an interdisciplinary team, which included the resident and or the residents representatives, contributed to the resident's comprehensive care plan as evidenced by the failure to conduct a quarterly care plan meeting. This was identified for 1 (#8) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 5/5/21, review of the first quarterly MDS (minimal data set) assessment dated [DATE], shown that resident #8 had a significant weight loss during the first 3 months of admission. (Excessive weight loss without prescribed weight loss program >5%within the past 30 days, >7.5% within the past 90 days.) Further review of the medical record on 5/10/21 did not reveal that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activity services to meet the needs of the resident. This was found to be evident for one out of one resident (Resident #36) reviewed for activities during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in 2019. The resident was dependent on staff for assistance with transfers and requires assistance with locomotion. The most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/4/2020, revealed that the resident participated in the assessment of Activity Preferences and indicated it was very important to have books, newspapers and magazines to read, listen to music he/she likes, keep up with news, go outside for fresh air and participate in religious services. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dressing changes were completed as ordered for an open area on the resident's coccyx (bony structure at bottom of spine). This was found to be evident for 1( #169) out of 25 residents reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 5/12/21, review of Resident #169's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2019 with diagnoses that included, but was not limited to dementia, high blood pressure, osteopenia (bone loss) and macular degeneration (eye disease that causes vision loss). Review of the progress notes revealed a nurse's note, with an effective date of 8/22/19, which revealed the resident was seen by the in house wound doctor for a consult on open area to coccyx area. Area observed 2 cm x 1.5 cm noted to be reddened and open, received order to cleanse area with Anasept pat dry apply med honey and 2 x 2 and cover with foam dressing qd [every day] and prn [as needed]. A corresponding physician order was found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, facility investigation documentation and interview, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure unwitnessed falls were thoroughly investigated for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #169) reviewed for accidents during the survey, and 2) failed to provide a physician ordered safety device for 1 of one out of the twenty five residents (Resident #8) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 5/12/21, review of Resident #169's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2019 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to dementia, high blood pressure, osteopenia (bone loss) and macular degeneration (eye disease that causes vision loss). Review of the admission nursing assessment, dated 5/1/2019, revealed the resident was able to ambulate with the use of an assistive device (ie walker) and was at a high risk for falls. Review of the nursing progress note, dated 5/10/19 at 10:38 AM, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility 1) failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of oxygen, 2) falsely documented that the resident was receiving oxygen when the resident was observed not receiving oxygen and 3) failed to develop and implement a person centered comprehensive care plan with resident centered goals for respiratory care to include oxygen therapy. This was evident for 1 (#57) of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the annual survey. The findings include: Observation was made on 5/3/21 at 11:15 AM, of Resident #57 in his/her room lying in bed. An interview was conducted with Resident #57 at that time and a green oxygen tank was observed sitting upright against the wall under the television. Resident #57 was asked if he/she was using the oxygen tank and the reply was no and Resident #57 was not observed receiving oxygen therapy. A second observation was made of Resident #57 on 5/4/21 at 12:25 PM with another surveyor,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer pain medication as ordered for a resident with a broken hip on at least 13 occassions over a 26 day period. This was found to be evident for one out of the twenty five residents (Resident #169) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 5/12/21, review of Resident #169's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2019 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia, high blood pressure, osteopenia (bone loss) and macular degeneration (eye disease that causes vision loss). Further review of Resident #169's medical record revealed the resident sustained a fractured femur (broken hip) on 5/13/19 and was hospitalized for over a week. Review of the physician orders revealed the following order with a start date of 5/23/19: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 5-325 mg, give 0.5 tablet by mouth three times a day for pain. This order was in effect until it was discontinued on 6/17/19. As a narcotic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the interdisciplinary team had determined that the resident was safe to self administer medications prior to allowing the resident to keep inhalers for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and nasal spray for allergies at the bedside; failed to develop a care plan to address the resident's self administration of medications and failed to ensure that the physician order specified which medications were to be kept at the resident's bedside for self administration. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 6 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 5/6/21, review of Resident #36's medical record revealed the resident had been admitted to the facility in 2019. The most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact.The resident has a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the medical record revealed a physician's order, in place since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, it was determined that facility staff failed to keep medication carts locked when unattended. This was evident on 1 of 2 nursing units observed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1) Observation was made, on 5/4/21 at 2:44 PM, of an unlocked and unattended medication cart sitting in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor opened the medication cart drawers and stood at the medication cart from 2:44 PM until 2:47 PM, while it was left unlocked and unattended. LPN # 7 walked up to the medication cart and stated, we thought we locked it. 2) Observation was made, on 5/11/21 at 2:05 PM, of an unlocked and unattended medication cart sitting in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The medication cart was unattended from 2:05 PM until 2:08 PM when RN #34, an agency nurse, walked up from the nurse's station and stated, I must have forgot to lock it .The surveyor was able to open the drawers and observed resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, diet slips, and staff interview, it was determined that a resident was receiving a therapeutic diet that was not prescribed by a physician. This was evident for 1 (resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in December of 2020. Review of the first quarterly MDS (minimal data set) assessment, dated 2/10/21, showed that resident #8 had a significant weight loss during the first 3 months of admission. (Excessive weight loss without prescribed weight loss program >5%within the past 30 days, >7.5% within the past 90 days.) Resident #8 was observed eating lunch on 5/7/21 at 12:10 PM. Resident #8 received a pureed diet that was divided into separate disposable containers. The portion sizes appeared to be small. Review of resident #8's meal/tray ticket indicated that the residents diet was pureed, NAS, small portions. The meal ticket also revealed/indicated Instructions: fluid restriction. Review of resident #8's electronic health record (EHR) did not reveal any orders for small portions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident with the most dignified existence (Resident #42). This was evident for 1 of 30 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: In an interview on 10/10/18 at 9:22 AM Resident #42 stated, the night shift nurse calls me Poppie. I don't really like it and have asked to be called by my name, but she still calls me that. Review of medical record revealed an activity of daily living care plan which stated that the Resident preferred to be called by his/her first name. The Administrator was made aware of this concern in an interview on 10/11/18 at 10:35 AM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident/resident representative in writing of a room change. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 30 residents reviewed during an annual re-certification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record on 10/12/18 revealed that Resident #38 was transferred to room [ROOM NUMBER] A on 09/21/18. In an interview with the facility social worker on 10/11/18 at 9:17 AM, the facility social worker stated that Resident #38 did not receive a written notice of a room change on 09/19/18 and confirmed Resident #38 was moved to his/her new room on 09/21/18. The facility Administrator and Director of Nurses were made aware of the findings at the exit conference on 10/12/18 at 3 PM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that the resident and resident's representative were notified in writing of the resident's transfer and the rationale for the transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 of 30 (Resident #70) residents reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The finding includes: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 was conducted on 10/11/18 at 12:50 PM. Review of the nurse's notes written on 7/16/18 revealed that Resident #70 had a change in medical condition that required an immediate transfer to an acute care hospital for further evaluation. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that the resident or the responsible party had been provided with a written notification of the transfer or the rationale for the transfer. Interview with social worker on 10/11/18 at 1:10 PM confirmed that the facility did not provide written notification of the hospital transfer or the rational. In an interview with on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that dependent resident's personal hygiene needs were adequately met by offering and providing showers as scheduled. This was evident for 1 of 30 (Resident #42) residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #42 and his/her spouse on 10/10/18 at 9:26 AM, they stated that Resident #42 had only had 1 shower since admission on [DATE]. Review of Resident #42's admission minimum data set (MDS) completed on 5/17/18 revealed that s/he was alert and oriented and required the assistance of 1-2 persons for activities of daily living to include bathing. The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps a nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident received the care they need. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a medical record and staff interview, it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to 1) obtain a dermatology consult for a resident, and 2) obtain weekly weights as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 2 (#36 and #8) of 30 residents reviewed during an annual re-certification survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #36's medical record on 10/11/18 revealed a physician's order, dated 09/21/18, instructing the nursing staff to obtain a dermatology consult for Resident #36. Further review of Resident #36's medical record on 10/11/18 failed to reveal Resident #36 had been seen by a dermatologist. In an interview with the nursing unit manager for Resident #36 on 10/11/18 at 3:20 PM, the unit manager stated that the facility Dermatologist was in the facility on 10/09/18 but did not assess Resident #36. In an interview with the facility director of nursing (DON) on 10/11/18 at 3:30 PM, the facility DON stated that Resident #36's spouse was seen by the Dermatologist on 10/09/18. The DON stated that Resident #36 was seen by the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to recognize and evaluate the nutrition needs of residents (Residents #13, #29, and #51). This was evident for 3 out of 31 resident reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey process. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record on 10/11/18 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the facility staff developed a care plan for: At risk for weight loss/dehydration. On 9/25/18 the dietitian documented continue to monitor Resident's weights weekly. Review of the Resident's weights revealed a documented weight on 10/8/18 of 117 pounds. The previous documented weight for the Resident was on 10/4/18 for 153 pounds. Further review of the medical record revealed no re-weight of the Resident when there was a significant change in weight of 36 pounds or documented note that the facility staff recognized the weight change. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/12/18 at 9:50 AM confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility staff and pharmacy failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician (Resident #7). This was evident for 1 out of 30 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey process. The findings include: During interview with Resident #7 on 10/10/18 at 9:35 AM the Resident stated the facility often runs out or doesn't have his/her medications, including Mobic and Synthroid. Mobic is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug used to treat pain or inflammation caused by arthritis. Synthroid is a medication that can treat hypothyroidism and can also treat an enlarged thyroid gland and thyroid cancer. Review of Resident #7's physician orders revealed on 9/17/18 at 2:35 PM the physician ordered Mobic 7.5 mg by mouth daily for pain. Review of the Resident's Medication Administration Record revealed the Mobic was not administered until 9/19/18, two days after it was ordered. Further review of the medical record revealed a nurse's note on 9/18/18 at 12:33 PM, Mobic is on the 2 PM run today per remedy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain blood pressures for a medication with parameters as ordered by the physician for a resident (Resident #29). This was evident for 1 out of 30 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey process. The findings include: Review of Resident # 29's medical record revealed on 8/24/18 the physician ordered: Lisinopril 10 milligrams (mgs) by mouth every day for hypertension, Hold for blood pressure less than 110/60. Lisinopril is a medication that lowers the blood pressure. Further review of the medical record revealed that the facility staff failed to document blood pressures with the administration of Lisinopril on the following dates in 2018: 8/29, 9/4, 9/6, 9/7, 9/8, 9/9, 9/10, 9/12, 9/14, 9/15, 9/16, 9/20, 9/21, 9/22, 9/23, 9/24, 9/25, 9/26, 9/27, 9/28, 9/29, 9/30, 10/3, 10/4, 10/5, 10/6, 10/7, 10/8 and 10/9/18. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 10/11/18 at 2:30 PM confirmed that the facility staff failed to document the blood pressure for a resident with medication parameters.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide safe and sanitary conditions to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. This was evident for 1 (#51) of 30 residents reviewed during the survey process. The findings include: During the initial interview and observation with Resident #51 on 10/09/18 at 9:43 AM and again at 2:17 PM, the Resident's bathroom was observed with an opened box of gloves on the floor under the sink, a used glove on the floor, a urine collection bag, a urinal and a soiled fracture pan tucked behind or hanging from the bathroom hand rail. There was also a noticeable strong urine odor. Also observed were two tooth brushes not covered, one placed in a kidney basin with dried white streaks with a tube of toothpaste, the 2nd toothbrush was laying on the back of the sink uncovered with another tube of toothpaste. Follow up observation on 10/10/18 at 8:45 AM revealed the urine collection bag, a urinal and a soiled fracture pan tucked behind or hanging from the bathroom hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain the Resident call bell system in safe operating condition. This was evident during the initial tour of the facility and throughout the survey. The findings include: On 10/9/18 during the initial tour, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with call bell plate pulled away from the wall with wires visible. On 10/10/18, 10/11/18 and 10/12/18 room [ROOM NUMBER] was again observed with the call bell plate pulled away from the wall with wires visible. On 10/12/18 during medication pass the call bell wall plate in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed pulled away from the wall with wires visible. The Administrator was made aware of this concern on 10/12/18 at 9:55 AM.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2021-05-13 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nursing aides per shift and failed to have the staff data requirements available in an accurate, clear and readable format. It was identified that the facility did not have staffing information readily available in a readable format for residents and visitors, for 9 out of 9 days of the survey. The findings include. Initial tour of the facility on 5/3/21 did not reveal a facility wide staff posting that indicated the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses (RN), Licensed practical nurses (LPN), and Certified nursing aides (CNA) per shift. The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 5/11/21 at 9:05 AM related to the facility's non-compliance with the Federal staff posting requirements. She acknowledged the missing posting and indicated that she would post the correct information. On 5/13/21 at 9:50 AM, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-05-13 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 2 (#54, #39) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #54's electronic and paper medical record on 5/4/21 at 8:41 AM revealed that on 3/31/21 at 10:00 AM, Resident #54 was transferred to the hospital for a change in medical condition. Further review of Resident #54's medical record documentation revealed that the responsible party was called, however, there was no written documentation that the responsible party and/or resident was notified in writing of the hospital transfer. An interview was conducted with LPN #13 on 5/10/21 at 12:57 PM. LPN #13 confirmed that a hospital transfer form notification for the resident or resident representative was not in the medical record. LPN #13 stated that when a resident is transferred to the hospital, copies of the transfer are placed in a red folder that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-05-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (#54, #39 ) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #54's electronic and paper medical record on 5/4/21 at 8:41 AM revealed that on 3/31/21 at 10:00 AM, Resident #54 was transferred to an acute care facility for a change in medical condition. Further review of Resident #54's medical record documentation revealed that the responsible party was called, however, there was no written documentation that the responsible party and/or resident was given a copy of the bed hold policy. An interview was conducted with LPN #13 on 5/10/21 at 12:57 PM. LPN #13 confirmed that a copy of the bed hold policy for Resident #54 was not in the medical record. LPN #13 stated that when a resident is transferred to the hospital, copies of the bed hold policy are placed in a red folder that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,420 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,420 — penalty dated 2024-10-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HOUCK, TAMMIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/27/2014
BECKHARDT, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/2016
CORDISH, STUARTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/2016
HEROLD, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/2016
LEE, CARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2014
REYNOLDS, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/2016
SANDY, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2014
TAYLOR, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/20/2016
VOURVOULAS, KOSTASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/20/2016
WARNS, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2014
WATSON, RANDALLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/20/2016
NAEGELE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/20/2016
MARYLAND MASONIC HOMES,LTDOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-98.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 14%Other / private 86%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$535per resident / day
operating cost
$16,257per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$269per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215361. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next