Alice Byrd Tawes Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 151 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 69.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical records review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician when there was an acute change in the resident's condition after a fall. This was found to be true for 1 out of 22 residents (Resident #4) reviewed during the investigation stage of the long-term care survey process. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident #4. The findings include: On 9/19/19 Resident #4's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September 2018 for rehabilitation and with diagnosis that included cerebral infarction, or stroke (a brain lesion in which a cluster of brain cells die when they don't get enough blood), right hemiplegia (paralysis of the right side) and high blood pressure. Review of the medical records revealed on 4/5/19 the resident was found on the floor beside the bed. Review of the investigative reports revealed that the resident's nurse, licensed practical nurse (LPN) #22 indicated that the resident was assessed and put back into the wheelchair. Review of LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of seclusion/abuse immediately or no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made aware to the facility's Administration team. This was evident for 1 (#4) out of 1 resident reviewed for allegations of abuse during the complaint survey. The findings include the following:Intake # 2964422 was reviewed on 5/20/26 at approximately 10:30AM for seclusion/ abuse allegations involving Resident #4.During an interview on 05/20/2026 at 11:40 AM with the Director of Nursing she stated, On 03/19/2026 there was an allegation of seclusion/abuse involving Resident #4, the facility investigated and the allegation was not substantiated. The facility provided the survey team with a copy of the investigation.Review of the investigation records on 05/20/2026 at 12:40 PM revealed that the facility was made aware of an allegation of seclusion/abuse involving Resident #4 on 03/19/2026 at 7:30 PM. Further review of records revealed that the facility did not report allegation to the Office of Health Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and facility staff interview, the facility staff failed to protect and value resident's dignity (Resident #38). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. The findings include: On 3/3/26 at 7:40am, the surveyor observed Resident #38 sitting in a wheelchair in front of the 2nd floor's nursing station attempting to get nursing staff's attention by stating excuse me repeatedly. The resident manually moved his/her wheelchair closer to the 2nd floor's nursing station and stated excuse me to LPN #17 which he/she was on the phone. LPN #17 ignored the resident. Infection Preventionist (IP) #14 walked past LPN #17 and the resident while the resident stated excuse me again. IP #14 also ignored the resident. The resident continued to attempt to get nursing staff's attention by excuse me without success. The closest nursing staff member to the resident was LPN #17 and LPN #17 continued to ignore him/her. When IP #14 re-entered the 2nd floor nursing station, the surveyor informed IP #14 that Resident #38 was requesting assistance. IP #14 asked the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on random observations it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for the residents of the 3rd floor. This was evident for 1 of 2 units ( 3rd floor). The findings include:Upon entering the 3rd floor on 3/3/26 at 9:00 AM and entering the open sitting area, this surveyor observed that the television was on, however, there was a black bar covering half of the screen on the left side. The tour of the unit and observations continued throughout the morning. Returning to the unit at approximately 11:50 AM on 3/3/26 to review medical records, the same observations were made of the television on in the sitting room with the black bar covering half of the screen on the left side, with the same television game show on.Observations of the 3rd floor unit on 3/4/26 at 10:09 AM revealed the same observations of the television on with the black bar covering the left half of the screen, with the same television game show on. This surveyor sat in the sitting area to complete observations at this time. A popular game show was on, however, only the host could be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status. This was found to be evident for 1out of 5 residents (R # 4) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey.The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need.A review of the medical record on 3/4/26 at 4:50 PM for Resident #4 revealed a completed MDS on 1/17/26 identifying Resident #4 as receiving an insulin injection for 7 days during the lookback period. A concurrent review of the medication administration record (MAR) failed to reveal that Resident #4 received any insulin injections for this most recent look back period for the coded MDS completed on 1/17/26. Interview on 3/5/26 with staff #8 revealed that she was the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident's nutrition status and failed to recognize a resident's need for feeding assistance and inform the dietitian/physician. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for nutrition. The Findings include: On 3/3/26 at 8:00am, the surveyor observed Resident #8 during breakfast attempting to feed him/herself. The resident was having difficulties with putting the food in his/her mouth due to tremors in the hands. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident, but the resident was lethargic and difficult to understand. On 3/3/26 at 8:35am, the surveyor interviewed GNA #12 regarding Resident #8's status and his/her ability to feed him/herself. GNA #12 stated that the resident was able to feed him/herself. The surveyor pointed out that the resident was observed having trouble feeding her his/herself due to tremors in the hands. GNA #12 stated that the resident normally picks at (his/her) food and requires no assistance with feeding. On 3/4/26 at 8:20pm, the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain ongoing communication with the dialysis facility. This was evident during the review of 1 of 1 Residents (#11), (all residents) who currently attend dialysis. The findings include:Review on 3/3/26 of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed that s/he currently received dialysis and according to the matrix provided to the survey team s/he is the only resident currently receiving dialysis.A review of the dialysis communication pages in the binder revealed inconsistencies in the completion of the assessments for each visit to dialysis and the return to the facility from dialysis. Interview with LPN #17 on 3/5/26 at 11:00 AM regarding the dialysis communication book, and process revealed that the assigned dialysis book goes with the resident to the dialysis center. LPN #17 was asked about the form with the 3 sections, she reviewed the book and said that dialysis needs to fill out the middle section, and the night shift does the top, she was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews of facility staff, it was determined that food service employees failed to ensure that sanitary practices were followed and safe food handling practices were followed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen and only 1 observation. The findings include:During the tour of the kitchen and observation of staff practices, this surveyor observed the following at 3/3/26 at 8:16 AM: On the cold prep table a large metal container holding milk was sitting unattended. Within arm's reach of the container of milk was an open bottle of water, a coffee cup and a personal black thermos with red hearts on it. Additionally, there was a white rag sitting next to and touching the metal pan of milk with orange, brown and black stains and flecks of debris.At 8:18 AM staff #9, the lead cook was notified of the observations and concerns and directed the staff to discard the container of milk, he had already removed the personal drinking items when he saw this surveyor making observations and notations. On 3/4/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 Residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical record documentation.The findings include:During a review of the Task Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #5 on 3/06/2026 at 7:51 AM it was discovered that Resident #5 had orders for wound care that was not signed off as being completed. The orders include:An order for Clean left buttock open area with Normal Saline Solution and cover with AG and dry sterile dressing was not signed off as completed on 2/23/2026.An order for Clean right calf open area with Normal Saline Solution, pat dry and cover with damp AG and dry sterile dressing every dayshift for wound care was not signed off as completed on 2/23/2026.An order to Clean wound to right outer elbow with Normal Saline Solution, pat dry, cover with Xeroform and dry sterile dressing was not signed off as completed on 2/23/2026.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/06/2026 at 9:05…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of reporting data, clinical records and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure assessments were sent to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as required. This was evident for 4 (#11, #51, #56, and #69) out of the 7 residents reviewed for late reporting. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. A review of seven residents' clinical records was conducted secondary to the survey process triggering this task for missing resident assessments. Records for Residents #11, #51, #56, #62, #63, #67, and #69 were reviewed on 11/20/24. The electronic health records revealed that some of the residents had an assessment that was listed as in progress. The MDS director was interviewed on 11/20/24 at 9:39 AM. She was provided with the names of the residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a baseline care plan summary to residents and/or resident's representative within 48 hours after admission. This was evident for 6 (#57, #8, #19, #36 # 30, and #10) out of 12 residents reviewed for baseline care plans during the recertification survey. The findings include: A baseline care plan (BLCP) must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and include the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the BLCP as well as a list of the resident's current medications must be given to each resident and/or his/her representative. Completion and implementation of the BLCP is intended to promote continuity of care and communication among staff, increase resident safety, and safeguard against adverse events (undesirable outcomes) that can occur right after admission. 1.) On 11/18/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD