Lions Rehab Center
901 Seton Drive, Cumberland, MD 21502 · For profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (301) 722-6272 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (91) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 33.5% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.1% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.9% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 36.4% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.1% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.9% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.9% | 25.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.5% | 13.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.8% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.6% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.11 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.4%CMS range 40.7–54.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.1%CMS range 10.5–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.8–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.37 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 80.1 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
91 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 80 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to prevent the development of a stage 4 pressure ulcer, failed to notify the physician when a weekly wound assessment began to indicate potential signs of infection, failed to implement a physician order for a surgical consult, and failed to ensure that a physician or nurse practitioner assessed the pressure ulcer from the time it was first identified as a stage 2 in January of 2022 until May of 2022, at which time the wound specialist assessed the wound as stage 4 ulcer. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #51) out of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. As a result of this failure, actual harm was identified for Resident # 51. The findings include: On 3/21/23, review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility in 2020 and whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to hemiplegia. Hemiplegia is a severe or complete loss of strength in the arm and leg of one side of the body. On 3/21/23, review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe/clean/comfortable/homelike environment for Residents. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) out of 15 Resident rooms and in review of an adequate supply of linen which has the potential to affect all Residents in the facility. The findings include: On 3/23/2026 at 10:45 AM the surveyor observed that the call light panel cracked in the Resident shared bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. In the Resident shared bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:55 AM on 3/23/2026 the surveyor observed a large crack in the cover to the ceiling light. In an interview with the Regional Maintenance Director at 9:20 AM on 3/26/2026, the surveyor conveyed that the call light panel and the ceiling light cover were cracked in Resident shared bathrooms on the 300 hall. The Maintenance Director toured the 300 hall with the surveyor and observed the cracked call light panel in room [ROOM NUMBER], and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate respiratory care and services. This was found to be evident in 4 (Resident #2, 3, 8 and #11) out of 5 Residents reviewed for respiratory care.The findings include: On 03/23/2026 at 12:06 PM Resident #8 was observed in bed with an oxygen concentrator in use. The oxygen tubing was not labeled and dated and there was no oxygen in use signage on the Resident room door.At 1:02 PM on 3/23/2026 the surveyor observed Resident #2 in his/her room with an oxygen concentrator in use. There was no oxygen signage on the Resident room door. Additionally, the oxygen tubing was not labeled and dated.In an interview with staff nurse #9 at 1:10 PM on 3/23/2026 the surveyor asked what the expectation was for oxygen in use signage on Resident room doors when the Resident was using oxygen. Staff nurse #9 stated that there should be an oxygen sign on the Resident room doors and that he/she would look for oxygen signs.At 1:26 PM on 3/23/2026 the surveyor observed Resident #11 in bed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with reasonable accommodation of need. This was found evident in 1 (for Resident # 42) of 6 facility-reported incidents reviewed on the survey. The findings include: On 3/26/26 at 7:18 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's investigation file in regard to an allegation of abuse/neglect of Resident #42 by a staff member on 3/7/26. On further review a statement was written by Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #32 that stated while attempting to assist Resident #42 to the bathroom it was noted that his/her bathroom was under construction so a bed pan was given. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #42's care plan. A care plan was created on 3/9/26 that stated, Resident #42 has Activities of Daily Life (ADL) self-care deficit. One of the interventions listed was to assist to the toilet/commode. Additionally, it stated Resident 42 needed maximum assistance of 1 staff for toileting. On 3/36/26 at 10:59 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Resident's Responsible Party (RP) was notified of changes in a resident's condition. This was evident for 1 (Resident #96) of 3 residents reviewed for wound care during the survey. The findings include: On 3/24/26 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed a complaint and a facility reported incident into allegations that Resident #96 did not receive appropriate care. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #96's medical record. The review revealed that on 12/5/25 the attending physician determined that Resident # 96 was unable to comprehend and make medical treatment decisions. On further review it was noted that Resident #96 had an Advanced Directive that named a healthcare power of attorney. In the progress notes the surveyor noted a wound provider documented seeing Resident #96 on 12/10/25 and addressed a new wound found on Resident #96 {genitalia}. The surveyor also noted a change of condition note written by Registered Nurse (RN) #34 on 12/10/25 regarding the new wound found on Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the personal privacy of a Resident. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #11) out of 2 Residents reviewed for urinary catheters.The findings include:Urinary Drainage Bag collects urine from a catheter designed to be kept below bladder level to present backflow and infections. Urinary drainage bags hang on the bedframe or wheelchair.At 1:23 PM on 3/23/2026 the surveyor observed Resident #11 in bed with a yellow substance in the urinary drainage bag hanging on the bedframe. On 3/24/2026 the surveyor observed Resident #11 on a stretcher in the hall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] with the urinary drainage bag in view.Care Plan is a personalized comprehensive roadmap addressing an individual's health, social, and functional needs. It covers activities of daily living (ADL), assessment of needs, safety modifications, health and medical care, including diagnoses. Care plan must be reviewed regularly and updated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's investigation report, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse and neglect from an employee. This was found evident on 1 (Resident #42) of 4 Residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The findings include:On 3/26/26 at 7:18 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's investigation file into the allegation that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #31 verbally abused and refused to provide care to Resident #42. The conclusion to the investigation stated that the allegation was verified by evidence collected during the investigation.Next the surveyor reviewed the statement given by GNA #32. GNA #32 reported she was asked to help pull Resident 42 up in bed with GNA #31 on the morning of March 7th, 2026. While entering Resident #42's room, GNA #32 heard Resident #42 state It's been a long time since I have been asking you to help me use the toilet. Please, I need to pee, otherwise, I am going to pee myself and the bed. GNA #32 reported the response of GNA #31 was, And I told you that I am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a qualifying diagnosis prior to prescribing a psychotropic medication. This was found to be evident in 1 (#97) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:Psychotropic medications are used to treat mental health disorders and are considered any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception. There are five main types of psychotropic medications, and each type has its own specific uses, benefits, and side effects. The five main types are: antidepressants, anti-anxiety, stimulants, antipsychotics and mood stabilizers.The surveyor noted during a record review on 03/24/2026 at 11:24 AM, that a prescriber ordered, SEROquel Oral Tablet 25 MG (Quetiapine Fumarate) Give 25 mg by mouth every morning and at bedtime for Agitation -Start Date03/19/2026 1900 for Resident #97. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident #97 was a new admission and the facility was trying to obtain records and learn a diagnosis for the antipsychotic medication. On 3/24/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #2 and #16) out 8 Residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments.The findings include:Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment is a federally mandated standardized assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid certified nursing homes to evaluate a Resident's functional, cognitive, and physical health. It guides care planning, improves clinical accuracy, and determines reimbursement rates. Assessments occur at admission, discharge, quarterly, and upon significant changes. The MDS assessments are completed by trained staff in the nursing home.The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #16's medical record on 3/24/2026 at 3:50 PM. Review of the 1/27/2026 Admission/Medicare-5 Day MDS assessment revealed that Resident #16 was coded No for Ostomy and Not rated for bowel continence.In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with summaries of their baseline care plans. This was found to be evident for 1 (#99) out of 8 residents reviewed for care planning during the recertification survey.The findings include:During a record review on 03/24/2026 at 1:02 PM, the surveyor found no documentation that the facility obtained a baseline care plan signature or provided a copy to Resident #99 or their representative. The surveyor requested documentation from the facility. The surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/25/2026 at 7:13 AM. The DON stated the facility lacked documentation showing that a copy of the baseline care planned was signed by, and provided to Resident #99. The social worker gave Resident #99 a copy but did not document it. The facility will work on that process.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for Residents. This finding was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #2, 5 and 11) out of 8 Residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include:Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining treatment for kidney failure that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood using a machine and a dialyzer (artificial kidney). Typically performed three times a week for 3-5 hours, it reduces symptoms of kidney failure. Blood is removed from the body through a vascular access point (fistula, graft, or catheter). Care plan is a written document that outlines a person's care needs and how they will be met. It's a key tool for health and social care professionals to ensure a Resident receives the right level of care. Care plan includes medical history, current treatments, and medications. Care plans should be reviewed regularly to monitor their effectiveness, and the Resident should be involved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 80 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to review, update and revise Resident's care plans after Resident's changes in conditions. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident #11 and #95) out of 13 Residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The findings include:Care plans are a written document that outlines a person's care needs and how they will be met. It's a key tool for health and social care professionals to ensure a Resident receives the right level of care. Care plan includes medical history, current treatments, and medications. Care plans should be reviewed regularly to monitor their effectiveness, and the Resident should be involved in the process. Additionally, care plans should be developed, revised and updated as necessary to reflect the Resident's condition by the interdisciplinary team. The care plan includes assessment, diagnoses, goals, interventions and outcomes. Care Plans are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a Resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications according to professional standards procedure. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) out of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. The findings included: Multi-dose insulin pens are handheld devices that contain a prefilled insulin cartridge for multiple injections combined with a needle. This pen allows users to dial specific dosages. A new needle is used for each dose given and the pen is designed for single-person use. The new needle is primed before every injection to remove air bubbles and ensure the needle allows the flow of insulin. Standard priming dose is 2 units of insulin. On 3/24/26 at 8:24 AM, the surveyor observed License Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 prepare insulin for Resident #69. The surveyor watched LPN 4 place the needle onto the top of the insulin pen and then dialed the insulin pen to 20 units. LPN #4 went into Resident #69's room to give the insulin to the Resident. After returning to the medication cart the surveyor asked LPN #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatments according to a Resident's plan of care. This was found evident of 1 (Resident #96) out of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. The findings include: On 3/24/26 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #96's medical records. A review of Resident #96's December Treatment Administration Record revealed that on 12/10/25 an order was written that stated, apply skin guard ointment to {genital area} and coccyx every day and evening shift for skin healing. The order was documented as completed on the evening of 12/10/25 and morning and afternoon on 12/11/25. The order was discontinued on 12/11/25. A new order was written to start on 12/12/25 that stated apply skin guard to {genital area} every day and evening shift for wound healing. However the new order did not include the orders to apply the treatment to the coccyx. A new order for the coccyx wound was written to start on 12/17/25 and stated, to cleanse with wound cleaner, apply medi-honey to the wound bed and cover with a border…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a Resident's hemodialysis access site. This finding was found to be evident in 1 (Resident #2) out of 1 Resident reviewed for dialysis.The findings include:Hemodialysis is a life-sustaining treatment for kidney failure that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood using a machine and a dialyzer (artificial kidney). Typically performed three times a week for 3-5 hours, it reduces symptoms of kidney failure. Blood is removed from the body through a vascular access point (fistula, graft, or catheter). The surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #2's medical record on 3/25/2026 at 9:25 AM. Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #2 had a physician order for dialysis treatment every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Further review of the physician orders revealed that there was no order for monitoring Resident 2's hemodialysis access site (right chest port). Additionally, Resident #2 did not have a comprehensive care plan for hemodialysis and emergency management.In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a resident's behavior management documentation. This was evident for 1 (Resident #22) out of 10 residents evaluated for behavioral, mental, and/or emotional health care and services during the recertification survey. The findings include: Mental disorder and psychosocial adjustment difficulty refers to the development of emotional and/or behavioral symptoms in response to an identifiable stressor(s) that has not been the resident's typical response to stressors in the past or an inability to adjust to stressors as evidenced by chronic emotional and/or behavioral symptoms. (Adapted from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth edition. 2013, American Psychiatric Association.).On 03/26/26 at 2:00PM, the surveyor conducted a record review. Resident #22 had diagnoses of major depressive disorder and anxiety. According to the resident's medication administration record, he/she was scheduled to take Mirtazapine 7.5 mg and Magnesium Oxide 400 mg. Their care plan and treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to a resident as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #70) out 47 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 3/26/26 at 12:13 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #70's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #70 had an order changed on 3/14/25 for lorazepam (a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety disorders and acute seizures) to be changed from every hour as needed to scheduled twice a day, due to an increase in behaviors. Depakote (an anticonvulsant and also used as a mood stabilizer) was also prescribed to be given twice a day for behaviors and agitation on that same day. Next the surveyor reviewed Resident #70's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR). The review revealed that Resident #70's lorazepam was left blank, indicating the medication was not given, on the afternoon dose of 3/14/26 through the morning dose of 3/19/26, in which the medication was discontinued in the afternoon. However, the depakote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food in the refrigerator. This was evident during the initial kitchen tour. This had the potential to impact food prepared in the kitchen. The findings include:On 03/23/26 at 8:51 AM, the surveyor discovered multiple containers of food that were covered with punctured foil. On 03/23/26 at 8:52 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Dietary Manager regarding food storage requirements. The Dietary Manager expressed it was an error and immediately removed the containers from the refrigerator.On 03/23/26 at 3:01 PM, the administrator acknowledged the concern.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility, 1) failed to provide functioning hand sanitizers, and 2) failed to correctly identify residents requiring transmission based precautions and 3) failed to perform hand hygiene before direct contact with a resident. This was found to be evident for 5 (110, 111, 406, 407, and 409) out of 10 rooms reviewed for hand sanitizers and 1 (104) out of 7 rooms reviewed for correct transmission-based precaution signage, and 1 (Staff #18) out of 1 staff observed for hand hygiene during the recertification survey.The findings include: 1) On 03/23/2026 at 9:03 AM, the surveyor observed hand sanitizer not working in room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and in the hall outside the rooms 101, 111 and 112. On 03/24/2026 at 9:05 AM, the surveyor also found non working hand sanitizer in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. When the surveyor asked Staff #7 about the process for replacing empty hand sanitizer, Staff #7 stated the facility did not yet possess the bags for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's call system functioned properly. This was found to be evident for 2 residents (#32 and #100) out of 11 residents evaluated for call light access during the recertification survey. The findings include:On 03/23/2026 at 11:56 AM, Resident #100 told the surveyor, My call light is not working. GNA #13 investigated the concern and confirmed that Resident #100 and also Resident #32's call lights were not working. GNA #13 stated they would call maintenance. The Director of Nursing was in the hall and was notified of the concern. On 03/24/2026 at 7:56 AM, GNA #12 stated maintenance fixed Resident #100's call light immediately yesterday. The Maintenance Assistant stated that the call cords weren't functioning but but changing the cords fixed the issue. When the surveyor asked what backup measures the facility utilized, the Maintenance Assistant stated they gave bells to residents if they could not fix the call bell right away.On 03/24/2026 at 8:01 AM, the Administrator acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe/functional/sanitary/comfortable environment for Residents and staff. This finding was found to be evident in 2 (Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) out of 15 Resident rooms and the Rehabilitation Department reviewed for safe, comfortable environment.The findings include:On 3/23/2026 at 11:00 AM the surveyor toured the Rehabilitation Department. The surveyor observed the screen cover to the speaker located in the ceiling to the entrance of the Rehabilitation Department. The screen cover was hanging loose from the ceiling and not intact to the ceiling. The surveyor conveyed to the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) on 3/23/2026 at 11:05 AM that the screen cover was loose and hanging from the ceiling at the entrance of the therapy department. The DOR observed the screen cover and stated that she would notify maintenance.At 11:45 AM on 3/23/2026 the surveyor observed doors to Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] that were marred,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate dispensing and administration of medications. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management.The findings include:On 10/27/25 at 10:32 AM, a review of the allegations related to complaint #2598971 indicated that Resident #5 was not getting the pain medication ordered for comfort care.A review of Resident #5's progress notes was conducted on 10/27/25 at 10:45 AM. A progress note with an effective date of 8/14/25 at 10:37 AM, indicated a verbal order from the physician to administer 5 ml of Morphine every 3 hours for pain and to discontinue all other medications. On 10/28/25 at 9:28 AM a review of Resident #5's narcotic count sheet was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The review revealed that the morphine solution 10mg/5ml was delivered on 8/15/25. Further review of the narcotic count sheet revealed that the nursing staff had initially used the morphine solution with a stock dose of 10mg/5ml and pulled 0.25ml for each administration from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication errors. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for pain management.The findings include:On 10/27/25 at 10:32 AM, a review of the allegations related to complaint #2598971 indicated that Resident #5 was in comfort care. However, the pain medication used was ineffective and the resident was complaining of pain and discomfort.A review of Resident #5's progress notes was conducted on 10/27/25 at 10:45 AM. A progress note with an effective date of 8/14/25 at 10:37 AM indicated that the resident was to receive 5 ml of Morphine every 3 hours for pain from a verbal order from the physician. The next progress note with an effective date of 8/14/25 at 10:54 AM indicated that the order for Morphine was checked and read back to the physician 3 times by the Registered Nurse (RN #3). The next progress note was created by RN #4 with an effective date of 8/14/25 at 10:31 PM, that indicated that the Morphine order was not delivered, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify resident's physician when medications were held. This was evident for 1 (R#62) of 3 residents reviewed for notification of medications not given during the complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/27/25 at 1:45 PM a record review of Resident #62's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2025 revealed an order for metoprolol (a medication that lowers blood pressure) with the instruction to hold for a systolic blood pressure (SBP) [top number of blood pressure] of 110 or less, or for a heart rate (HR) of less than 60 beats per minute. The MAR entries on 5/03/25, 5/04/25, 5/15/25, 5/16/25, 5/21/25 indicated that the medication was held on those days due to either low SBP or low HR. Further review failed to reveal any documentation that the resident's physician was notified that the medication was held on those days. On 5/27/25 at 1:56 PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) to review Resident #62's MAR for May 2025. She confirmed the finding that the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to complete thorough investigations of allegations of abuse. This was evident for 1 (#MD00217463) of 7 facility reported incidents reviewed during the complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/29/25 at 9:45 AM a review of the facility reported incident #MD00217463 revealed an allegation that staff verbally abused Resident #516 on 4/30/25. A review of the facility's investigation file revealed several typed resident interview statements. All of the resident statements lacked the name of the interviewer and the date the interview was conducted. The investigation file also contained staff interview statements from 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #16 & GNA #17). GNA #16's statement indicated that she was not assigned to the resident at that time, and GNA #17's statement did not indicate if she worked with the resident at that time. The file also lacked a list of staff who worked on the resident's unit that day, and lacked any evidence that abuse education was provided to staff after the incident. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards. This was evident for 1 (MD00215206) of 7 facility reported incidents investigated during the complaint survey. The findings include: A review of the facility reported incident (FRI) #MD00215206 revealed that Resident #509 had an unwitnessed fall on 2/26/25. On 2/27/25 a nursing assessment revealed that the resident's left wrist was swollen and discolored. An x-ray was ordered and done on 2/27/25 and showed that the resident's left wrist was fractured. A review of the facility's investigation file was conducted on 5/28/25 at 9:20 AM. The file contained two duplicate handwritten documents, dated 3/06/25, signed by the consultant orthopedic Physician Assistant (Staff #15). One form contained notations of a capital letter R within a circle to indicate that the resident's right wrist was affected. The other document contained notations of a capital letter L within a circle, to indicate that it was the resident's left wrist that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received ordered medications or treatments. This was evident for three (Resident #36, #12, and #3) out of 29 residents reviewed for medical records. The findings include: On 5/28/2025 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the surveyor reviewed the Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR) for Residents #36, #12, and #3. The surveyor found that the following physician-ordered medications and treatments were missed: Resident #36 On 5/4/25 (6:00 a.m. dose) - Acetaminophen, oral tablet 1000 mg, three times a day for chronic pain, was not administered. On 5/3/25 (5:00 p.m. dose) and 5/4/25 (6:00 a.m. dose) - Blood sugar checks with Humalog injection solution (100 units/mL, sliding scale), subcutaneously four times a day for diabetes management, were missed. On 5/16/25, 5/17/25, and 5/18/25 - All scheduled doses (6:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 4:30 p.m., and 10:00 p.m.) of blood sugar checks with Insulin Aspart FlexPen injector (100 units/mL, sliding scale),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's urine collection bag was secured off the floor. This was evident in 1 (Resident #502) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The findings include: Resident #502 had been residing in the facility since early 2025. Medical records indicated that the resident was admitted with a foley catheter. A Foley catheter is a device that drains urine (pee) from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't pee on your own or for various medical reasons. Securing a urine collection bag is crucial to prevent leaks, reduce the risk of infection, and ensure proper catheter function, as well as prevent damage to the bladder neck or urethra. On 5/27/25 at 9:47 AM, Resident #502 was observed in bed sleeping with the urine collection bag laying on the floor. The Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA #8) who was assigned to the resident's unit confirmed the resident's name by pointing the resident out to the surveyor then left the area. Later at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document the reasons for administering as-needed (PRN) pain medications, failed to document the pain assessment to include intensity of pain, location of pain, and description of pain, and failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions before administering pain medication to residents. This was evident for 2 (#24 and #64) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: A pain intensity scale is one way to measure pain. The pain scale helps track how well a treatment plan is working to manage pain. Most pain scales use numbers from 0 to 10. A score of 0 means no pain, and 10 means the worst pain one has ever known. On 5/27/25 at 10:30 AM a record review of the Pain Control Policy revealed that assessing a resident's pain should include the frequency, duration, intensity of the pain when a resident gets regularly scheduled and/or PRN analgesics. The physcisian should order Non-pharmacological Interventions (NPI). On 5/28/25 at 11:06 AM a record review of Resident #24's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received their medications according to the attending physician's orders. This was evident for 1 (#518) out of 3 residents reviewed for medication regimen review (MRR). The findings include: A medical record review on 5/29/2025 at 10:43 AM showed that an MRR was completed by a pharmacist for Resident #518 on 3/21/25 with a recommendation to the resident's attending provider. The recommendation indicated that Resident #518 had been taking an antiulcer drug 40mg every day since 2023. It recommended a dose reduction to 20mg. A continued review revealed that Resident #518's attending provider responded to the recommendation on 3/28/25 with a new order to reduce the medication to 20mg daily. Further review of Resident #518's Medication Administration Record (MAR) from March 28 to May 30, 2025, revealed that the resident continued to receive the antiulcer medication at a total daily dosage of 60 mg, consisting of the 40 mg daily, and a newer dosage of 20 mg daily. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as part of the infection prevention and control program. This was evident for 2 (Resident #40 and Resident #503) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a targeted infection prevention intervention requiring gown and glove use for high-contact care activities in residents with wounds, indwelling medical devices, or colonization/infection with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). High-contact care activities involve extensive, close physical contact between staff and the residents and are more likely to result in the transmission of infectious agents. These include but are not limited to dressing the resident, bathing/showering, transferring the resident, providing hygiene (e.g., assist with toileting, oral care), changing linens, providing wound care, providing device care or use (e.g., care of feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor temperatures for the dishwasher machine to ensure adequate sanitation, and ensure temperatures were checked for mechanical soft and pureed foods before serving. This was evident for 5 of 8 daily dish machine logs and 3 of 13 daily food temperature logs reviewed. The findings include: 1) On 1/8/25 during the initial entrance conference, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the facility was currently experiencing a GI (gastrointestinal) outbreak. A tour of the kitchen on 1/8/25 at 11:10 AM, revealed that the dish machine log had no entries since 1/3/25. At 11:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the concern with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the DON that they were currently in a GI outbreak and that there was no indication that the dish machine temperatures had been checked for several days. During a follow up tour of the kitchen on 1/14/25, surveyor confirmed that the dishwasher provided heat sanitation of the dishes. After several runs through, the dishwasher…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments 1) were accurately documented and 2) accurately reflected a Resident's status. This was evident for 4 (#60, #24, #64, #75) out of 35 residents reviewed during the survey The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is an assessment of the Resident that provides the facility information necessary to develop a care plan, provide the appropriate care and services to the Resident, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. 1a) In an observation on 1/9/25 at 8:16 AM, Resident #60 was eating his/her breakfast and was noted to be edentulous (having no teeth). The Resident stated at that time that s/he wore complete dentures. On 1/13/25 at 4:18 PM, a review of Resident #60's medical record contained facility dental assessments dated 8/3/24 and 11/12/24. The assessments recorded that Resident #60 had no natural teeth. Continued review found a dental visit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident participated in the care plan process and failed to revise a resident's care plan. This was evident for one (#40) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and one (#269) of three residents reviewed for care planning during the survey. The findings include: 1) Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in late 2022. A review of the resident's most recent comprehensive assessment with a reference date of 12/20/24, was conducted on 1/9/25 at 11:33 AM. the review revealed Section GG (Functional Abilities), where the resident was coded according to the amount of assistance provided to complete several activities. These activities include: o Eating: Supervision or touching assistance - Helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity. Assistance may be provided throughout the activity or intermittently. o…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) provide residents with the amount of assistance needed during meals and 2) ensure that residents unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) were given incontinence care. This was evident for 5 (#469, #74, #270, #60, #22) of 8 residents reviewed for ADL during the recertification survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. 1a) A review of complaint #MD00193700 dated 6/23/23 revealed an allegation that Resident #469 required assistance with eating but was not helped by the staff to eat. The continued review contained an MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #469. The MDS recorded that the Resident required extensive to total assistance from staff with all ADLs and extensive assistance with eating. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document the reasons for administering as-needed (PRN) pain medications, failed to document pain assessment to include the location of the pain and type of pain, and failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions before administering pain medication to a Resident reporting pain. This was evident for 1 (#24) of 6 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 2 ( #59, #64) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: 1) A review of Resident #24's medical record on 1/9/25 at 2:04 PM showed that the resident had been residing in the facility since August 2015 with diagnoses including chronic pain, Arthritis, neuropathy (pain from the nerves) and was able to communicate his/her needs. A pain scale is a numerical scale, usually 1-10, used to rate a person's severity of pain. A continued review of Resident 24's medication administration record for November 2024 to January 2025 showed that the resident had received pain medication on 11/7/24 for a pain level of 4,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident's urine collection bag was kept in a privacy bag to maintain dignity. This was evident for 2 (#419, #64) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The findings include: 1) On 1/8/25 at 11:19 AM, Resident #419 's foley bag was observed on the floor from the hall without a privacy cover. The Resident was in bed. On 1/8/25 at 11:46 AM, Resident #419's foley bag was observed attached to the bed rail from the hall without a privacy cover. On 1/8/25 at 1:16 PM, Resident #419 was observed in bed eating lunch using a wheeled bedside table. The foley bag did not have a privacy cover. On 1/8/25 at 1:49 PM, it was observed that the bedside table, without a food tray, had been moved away from the Resident. The foley bag lay on the floor without a privacy cover. On 1/13/25 at 10:30 AM, Resident #419 was observed asleep in bed. The foley bag lay on the floor without a privacy cover. On 1/13/25 at 10:57 AM Resident #419 was observed awake in bed. The foley bag lay on the floor without a privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call devices were kept within reach of the resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #40) in 24 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: Resident #40 had been residing in the facility since 2022. Two complaints related to MD00210880 and MD00211651 indicated concerns with the resident's call device being placed on the roommate's nightstand outside the resident's reach. Minimum Data Set- The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. On 1/9/25 at 11:33 AM, a review of Resident #40's most recent MDS assessment with a reference date of 12/20/24 was conducted. The review revealed that Resident #40 was coded as dependent on staff for transfers and mobility and needed substantial/maximal assistance from staff for toileting hygiene. On 1/10/25 at 10:43 AM, Resident #40 was observed sleeping in his/her room with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents with quarterly statements in writing of their personal funds account managed by the facility. This was evident for one Resident (#22), who was reviewed for personal funds during the survey. The findings included: In an interview on 1/8/25 at 11:18 AM, Resident #22 responded Yes to keeping money in the facility like a bank. Then, it was added that s/he had not received a written quarterly statement of the account for a year. During a subsequent interview on 1/10/25 at 11:45 AM, the Business office manager (BOM) reported that he hand-delivered quarterly statements to residents who could make their own decisions. He also noted that he discussed the statements with the residents' who signed them and returned them to him for his records. He added that he only made copies for residents who requested them. A review of Resident #22 medical record contained a document completed by the Resident's attending provider that indicated the Resident could make his/her own decisions. In an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure they informed residents of their right to formulate an advance directive. This was evident for one resident (#269) who was reviewed for advance directives during the survey. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #269 on 1/8/25 at 1:00 PM showed that the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2024. The review contained a document completed by the resident's attending provider on 12/22/24 that indicated the resident could make his/her own decisions. An advance directive is a legal statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor because of illness or incapacity. The review failed to show that Resident #269 had an advanced directive or that the resident or his/her representative had been informed of his/her right to formulate an advanced directive. During an interview on 1/8/25 at 1:16 PM, the nurse manager, also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician when a medication was held several times for low systolic blood pressure (SBP). This was evident for 1 (Resident #44) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: The review of Resident #44's medical records on 1/15/25 at 3:38 PM revealed an order, with a start date of 12/27/22 for Metoprolol 50 mg to be given twice a day for Cardiomyopathy (a disease of the heart muscle that makes it harder for the heart to pump blood to the rest of the body); and to hold (not administer) if the pulse was less than 60 or the systolic blood pressure (top number of a blood pressure) was less than 100. On 1/15/25 at 4:06 PM record reviewed revealed that on several occasions when the metoprolol was held due to low parameters; that no documentation was found to indicate that the physician was made aware. Review of the April 2024 MAR revealed that the metoprolol was held due to low SBP or low heart rate (HR) on the following dates: 4/3 pm - HR was 54 4/6 pm - BP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its abuse policy. This was evident for one ( #3) of two residents who alleged misappropriation of property and filed a grievance. The findings include: On 1/8/25 at 4:40 PM, during an interview with Resident #3, the resident stated that in December 2024, their items were stolen and they suspected a staff member. The resident reported the stolen items to the facility. On 1/9/25 at 11:20 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide the facility's grievance log for 2024 and the facility's grievance policy. On 1/10/25 at 11:33 AM, a review of the December 2024 facility grievance log failed to show an entry of Resident #3's allegation. On 1/16/25 at 11:39 AM, during an interview with the DON, she stated that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) investigated Resident #3's allegation of stolen items. The DON also verbalized that it was the facility's policy that either the NHA or the DON reported any allegations of misappropriation of residents' property to the state agency. On 1/16/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an incident of alleged misappropriation of resident's property to the Office of Health Care Quality.This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents who alleged misappropriation of property and filed a grievance. The findings include: The Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland's healthcare facilities and community-based programs. Allegations of misappropriation of property are to be reported to the Office of Healthcare Quality in a timely manner. On 1/8/25 at 4:40 PM, during an interview with Resident #3, the resident stated that in December 2024, their items were stolen and they suspected a staff member. The resident reported the stolen items to the facility. On 1/16/25 at 11:39 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) investigated Resident #3's allegation of stolen items. The DON also verbalized that, per the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure essential care upon admission. This was evident for 1 (Resident #71) out of 4 residents reviewed for neglect during the survey. The findings include: Diabetes is a condition when one's body cannot transport glucose, the useable energy for cellular life, out of the bloodstream and into the individual cells of the body. Diabetic management may require that the Diabetic person receives insulin to help transport the glucose out of the bloodstream and into the cells. On 1/13/25 at 1:40 PM, a record review of Resident #71 lab results dated 4/20/23 showed blood glucose was 361.0 mg/dL at 10:24 PM. On 1/13/25 at 2:04 PM, a record review of hospital discharge orders dated 4/20/23 at 11:34 AM, documented insulin orders as: Lantus (long-acting) 14 units subcutaneous at night daily, Lispro (short-acting) 4 units before lunch and 9 units before breakfast. On 1/13/25 at 2:07 PM, a record review of the Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet residents' needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #419) out of 3 residents who were reviewed for care planning during a survey. The findings include: An indwelling Foley catheter is a medical device used to treat urinary incontinence, the involuntary leakage of urine, that transports urine through a tube, from the bladder to an external bag. On 1/13/25 at 4:13 PM, a record review of the physician orders showed an order to maintain 16 French [indwelling] Foley catheter and [give] catheter care every shift. On 1/13/25 at 4:18 PM, a record review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed that foley care was being completed. On 1/13/25 at 4:41 PM, a record review of Resident #419's comprehensive Care plan failed to plan, develop and implement catheter care. On 1/16/25 at 11:40 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated, I expect residents with an indwelling foley catheter to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for weights. This was evident for 1 (Resident #44 ) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 1/13/25 at 12:08 PM, during a review Resident #44's medical record revealed a diagnosis of congested heart failure (CHF). Review of the care plan revealed a plan for Potential for fluid volume imbalance related to CHF and included an intervention of daily weights as ordered. This intervention was most recently revised on 10/24/24. Review of the medical record revealed a fax coversheet that documented that the facility notified the physician on 10/21/24 that the resident was refusing daily weights, and asked Can we just do weekly weights on [him/her]? The physician had responded with a yes and her signature and the date on the return fax was 10/25/24. Further review of the medical record revealed there was an order for daily weights in effect from 4/29/24 until it was discontinued on 11/8/24. Further review of the medical record failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing of pressure ulcers. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #75) out of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #75 medical records on 1/16/25 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospitalization for surgical repair of a hip fracture. The resident ' s diagnosis included but not limited to diabetes, anemia, and high blood pressure. The hospital transfer summary also included documentation of a sacral decubitus (pressure) ulcer. The sacral area is located at the base of the spine. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date [last date of assessment] of 7/23/24, revealed the resident required partial assist for rolling left to right and substantial assistance with moving from sitting to lying. This assessment also revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure fall mats were in proper placement. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) in 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The Findings include: Resident #10 had been residing in the facility since 2018. An interview with the Resident's responsible party on 1/9/25 at 9:31 AM indicated that the resident was a fall risk. On the same day at 10:02 AM, Resident #10 was observed in bed, no care was actively being provided. The fall mat was folded up on the floor, against the cabinet by the foot of the resident's bed. On 1/10/25 at 9 AM a review of Resident #10's care plan regarding potential for injury from falls had interventions that include to apply fall mats to the left side of the bed. On 1/10/15 at 10:36 AM, the resident's fall mat was observed folded up on the floor, against the cabinet by the foot of the resident's bed. The resident was in bed, no one else was in the room with the resident. A review of the most recent fall risk evaluation with a reference date of 12/30/24 was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews,and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for care of residents with indwelling catheter. This was evident for 2 (#64, #419) of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The findings include: 1) Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in early 2024. During the initial tour of the facility on 1/8/25 at 12:37 PM, the resident was observed in his/her room and the urine collection bag was lying directly on the floor. The Registered Nurse (RN #3) who was assigned to the unit where Resident #64 resided was interviewed on 1/8/25 at 12:39 AM. During the interview, the concern was discussed that the resident's urine collection bag was observed lying directly on the floor in the resident's room. RN #3 went in the resident's room, confirmed the finding and hung the urine collection bag on the resident's bed frame. An indwelling catheter, also known as a Foley catheter, is a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine. The catheter is held in the bladder by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care was overseen by a physician. This was evident for 1 (#24) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A review of Resident #24's medical record showed that s/he had been living in the facility since 2015 and received antidiabetic and thyroid medications daily. The continued review contained Resident #24's attending provider's (provider #23) notes from January- December 2024. The notes referred to the resident's A1C and TSH blood work results from 2022 and 2023 (A1c is a blood test that measures the average blood glucose level over the past 2-3months and TSH- is a test that measures the level of thyroid-stimulating hormone in the blood). However, the review failed to show that A1C and TSH blood work were done in 2024 for Resident #24. Further review of attending provider #23's notes dated 6/27/24 contained a statement to do A1C blood work as ordered. Then, on July 7/23/24, the notes said to recheck A1C the following month. The notes for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's notes were complete, accurate, signed, and dated at each visit and part of the medical record. This was evident for 2 (#24, #44) of 35 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Record review on 1/9/25 at 11:00 AM showed that Resident #24 had been residing in the facility since 2015. A continued review lacked documentation of Resident #24's attending provider's (provider #23) visit notes from January to December 2024. The director of nursing (DON) was questioned at the time and stated that there were no attending provider visit notes in the facility's electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #24. On 1/13/25 at 12:07 PM, the DON presented the attending provider's notes from January- December 2024 to the surveyor. The notes were not part of the medical record for Resident #24 at the time of the survey. Continued review revealed that Resident #24 had received visits from attending provider #23 on 1/3/24, 1/31/24, 2/28/24, 3/26/24, 4/29/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent with their skills set. This was evident for 2 Registered Nurses (RN #19 and RN #3) of 2 nursing staff evaluated for competency. The Findings include: Nursing competence is defined by the American Nurses Association as an expected level of performance that integrates knowledge, skills, abilities, and judgment. On 1/08/25 at 10:57 AM, a list of all employees was requested. On 1/09/25 at 2:50 PM as part of the staffing task for the recertification survey, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide competency evaluations for 2 randomly selected nurses. On 1/14/25 at 2:21 PM, staff documents were received and a review revealed: 1). RN #19 was hired in August 2024 and had no record of competency evaluation, 2). RN #3 was an agency staff hired in May 2023 and had no record of competency evaluation. On 1/15/25 at 3:53 PM, an interview with the DON was conducted. The DON was asked if the facility had any evidence of competency evaluations for RN #3 and RN #19. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not have a Director of Nursing who worked on a full-time basis. This was evident during the recertification survey and had the potential to impact all residents, staff, and visitors. The findings include: On 1/14/25 at 9:40 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON confirmed that she was the only Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse in addition to her role as the DON of the facility. She also explained that she knew the dual role created a concern with the lack of a full-time basis DON. The DON stated that the facility's administration was aware of this concern. On 1/16/25 at 2:03 PM, during another interview with the DON, she acknowledged that her dual role as the IP nurse and DON created a deficiency for a full-time DON at the facility.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Irregularities identified by the pharmacist were reviewed and acted upon timely by the attending physician and failed to develop policies and procedures for the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) to include time frames for the different steps in the process. This was evident for one (#24) of 6 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A medical record review on 1/9/25 at 2:04 PM showed Resident #24 had been residing in the facility since 2015 and received multiple drugs, including an antifungal cream, to the abdomen folds. The continued review contained monthly pharmacy review notes from January- December 2024. On 5/21/2024, the pharmacy recommendation stated, Resident continues Nystatin powder BID [twice daily] for MASD [moisture associated skin damage] to Abd. [abdominal] folds. Per the antibiotic stewardship program, it is recommended to use antifungals for the shortest duration possible. Please review if [he/she] can change to a barrier cream…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents' drug regimens free from unnecessary medications by failing to ensure residents received their medications according to the attending physician's orders. This was evident for 2 (#59, #44) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The finding include: 1) Resident #59 had been residing in the facility since early 2024. On 1/8/25 at 11:16 AM, the resident was observed in his/her room. The resident was lying in bed, appeared to be in discomfort, and when asked to conduct an interview, the resident declined and stated, I'm not feeling too good. Morphine is used to treat pain severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and when other pain medicines did not work well enough or cannot be tolerated. Morphine belongs to the group of medicines called narcotic analgesics PRN is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase pro re nata, which means as the need arises. On 1/10/25 at 9:41 AM, a review of Resident #59's medication orders were conducted. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) accurately document the reconciliation of controlled medications and 2) store medications in accordance with professional standards by failing to discard expired medications, failing to date medications when opened, and failing to ensure that medications were not left at a resident's bedside. This was evident for 1 out of 2 narcotic record books reviewed and 1 (#26) out of 35 residents observed during the survey and 2 of 2 medication carts observed. The findings include: 1) On 1/8/25 at 11:25 AM, an observation on of a narcotic record book laying on the medication cart, in the 400-hallway was made. Observation revealed the nurse that reconciled that narcotic count at 7:00 AM also signed in the space reserved for the change of shift for 3:00 PM. On 1/8/25 at 11:27 AM, during a brief interview with Nurse (Staff #7), she reported that she did sign the narcotic transfer book in its designated line at 7:00 AM at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a qualified dietary staff. This was evident for 1 of 1 Director of Food Services. The findings include: On 1/13/25 at 3:43 PM, an interview with the Director of Food Services (Staff #22) and the Regional Manager of Food Services (Staff #21) was conducted. When asked for their credentials for their current positions, Staff #22 stated that she was currently enrolled in school for her certification and she would provide the information for her school records. On 1/14/25 at 3:31 PM, the surveyor called to speak with the Clinical Dietitian, who began working remotely with the facility the last week of November 2024, and is currently employed with Nutrico. During the interview, the dietitian confirmed that she does interact with the kitchen staff for snacks, supplements and menus for the residents but that she does not manage or supervise the kitchen. On 1/17/25 at 12:08 PM, surveyor reviewed the concern with the Regional Manager of Food Services (Staff #21) that the Director of Food Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to comply with State regulations when the facility failed to 1) employ a qualified social worker, 2) monitor employee's relevant health status, 3) provide a minimum of 3 hours of bedside care per occupied bed per day, and 4) ensure the Quality Assurance committee contained the required members. These deficiencies were found during the recertification survey and had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. The findings include: 1). The State of Maryland Code of Regulations at 10.07.02.30 B states that B. (S 1320, ' Staff Qualifications ' ) Social Work Staff Responsibility. (1) Social services responsibilities in the nursing home shall be assigned to a: (a) Licensed bachelor social worker; (b) Licensed graduate social worker; (c) Licensed certified social worker; or (d) Licensed certified social worker- clinical. (2) If the social worker is not a licensed certified social worker (LCSW) or a licensed certified social worker-clinical (LCSW-C), the nursing home shall arrange for an LCSW or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate and legible medical records. This was evident for 3 (#26, #36, #12) out of 35 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 1/8/25 at 11:00 AM, an observation of a plastic medicine cup with many pills sat on top of Resident #26's bedside table. On 1/8/25 at 11:10 AM, in an interview with Staff #7, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, that the resident takes them when s/he wants to. I can't make her/him take them. On 1/8/25 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor observed Staff #7 instructed the resident to take the medications that sat on the bedside table. On 1/8/25 at 11:25 AM, in a brief interview, Staff #7 reported that medications were documented as given when brought into the room. I don't know what time s/he takes the medications. On 1/13/25 at 5:18 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she reported that the facility did not have a process to know when Resident #26 took the medications. She stated, There's no way of telling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and pertinent document review, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure a glucometer was adequately disinfected between different resident uses in a manner that met minimum standards and minimized risk for the infectious spread of blood-borne pathogens, and 2) ensure that Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) policies and procedures were reviewed at least annually. This was evident for 1 Resident ( # 26), in a random observation during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Blood glucose meters are portable devices that measure blood glucose levels and aid in diabetes self-management. Healthcare providers use these types of devices in a variety of clinical settings. Blood glucose meters can easily become contaminated during use. When used in healthcare or other group settings, germs and infections can spread if preventive measures are not in place. 01/10/25 06:26 AM, Nurse Agency Staff #2 was observed measuring Resident #419's glucose levels utilizing a glucometer. On 1/10/25 at 6:32 AM, continued observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the 2024-2025 COVID-19 immunization to residents and staff. This was evident for 1) five residents (Resident #3, #22, #63, #64, #269) of five residents, and 2) four staff (Staff #3, #24, #25, and #26) of five staff records reviewed for COVID-19 immunization during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1a) On 1/8/25 at 12:01 PM, an interview with Resident #22 was conducted and he/she stated that he/she requested the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine but had not received the vaccine. On 1/9/25 at 3:47 PM, a review of Resident #22's health record failed to show that the resident received or refused the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. 1b). On 1/8/25 at 4:49 PM, an interview with Resident #3 was conducted and he/she stated that he/she requested the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine but had not received the vaccine. On 1/9/25 at 3:51 PM, a review of Resident #3's health record failed to show that the resident received or refused the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. On 1/9/25, at 4:27 PM, a review of 3 other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advance directives were discussed with residents and/or responsible representatives and orders for life sustaining treatment were voided when new orders were implemented. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #27, #46 and #136) out of 6 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident # 27's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in [DATE]. The resident was deemed unable to make health care decisions by two physicians on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 3:00 PM, review of the resident's paper chart revealed two valid MOLST (Maryland Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) forms. The MOLST, dated [DATE], revealed orders for No CPR and indicated that it was not discussed with the resident, but rather a health care agent or gaurdian. The MOLST, dated [DATE], revealed orders to attempt CPR in the event of cardiac and/or pulmonary arrest and indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-22 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 4 (#3, #133, #19, and #7 ) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 3/14/23 at 1:00 PM, a review of Resident #3's medical record revealed that, on 2/26/23, Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital emergency department following a change in his/her medical condition. On 2/26/23 at 6:34 PM in an SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Request) (a standard way to communicate medical information) note, the nurse documented that Resident #3 had a change in condition related to abdominal pain, constipation, or impaction; the primary care provider was notified and recommended that Resident #3 be transferred to the emergency room. On 2/26/23 at 7:21 PM, in a Nurse's Note, the nurse indicated that Resident #3's oxygen level was fluctuating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-22 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred/discharged from the facility to an acute care facility. This was evident for 4 (#3, #133, #19, and #7 ) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 3/14/23 at 1:00 PM, a review of Resident #3's medical record revealed, that on 2/26/23, Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital emergency department following a change in his/her medical condition. On 2/26/23 at 6:34 PM, in an SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Request) (a standard way to communicate medical information) note, the nurse documented Resident #3 had a change in condition related to abdominal pain, constipation, or impaction and the primary care provider was notified and recommended that Resident #3 be transferred to the emergency room. On 2/26/23 at 7:21 PM, in a Nurse's Note, the nurse indicated that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-22 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessments accurately reflected the resident's status as evidenced by failure to assess that a resident was receiving dialysis, and incorrectly assessing the resident as having diabetes when there was no supporting evidence to indicate it was a current active diagnosis. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 136 and #7) out of 46 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 3/15/23, review of Resident # 136's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the development of a comprehensive person centered care plan as evidenced by failure to develop a care plan to address a resident's needs related to receiving dialysis; failure to develop a care plan for 3 months to address the resident's needs related to a pressure ulcer. This was found to be evident for 3 ( #136, #51, and #21) out of ## residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. MDS (Minimum Data Set) - is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1) On 3/15/23, review of Resident # 136's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure that interdisciplinary team care plan meetings were scheduled to review and revise care plans after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and failed to update care plans when there were changes in resident needs or preferences. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident # 133, #7, and #46) out of 43 residents who had care area investigations completed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 3/16/23 at 9:56 AM, a review of Resident #133's medical record revealed that Resident #133 resided in the facility since June 2020, until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure activities to meet the needs of the residents. This was found to be evident for 2 (#46, and #7) out of 5 residents reviewed for activities during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed the resident has resided at the facility for more than a year. The resident was dependent on staff for bed mobility and had impaired cognitive status with confusion. On 3/6/23 at 1:36 PM, the resident was observed in bed, staff were in the room but not interacting with Resident #46 at the time of the observation. On 3/7/23 at 8:55 AM and at 11:04 AM, resident was observed in bed. No tv, music or other activity were observed at these times. The resident was not observed participating in or receiving visits from activity staff during the first two days of the survey. On 3/8/23, review of the resident's care plan revealed a plan with a focus of Resident spends the majority of time in/near [his/her] room and needs 1-1 visits. Goal: Resident will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of staffing information, complaints allegations, medical records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nurse staffing. This was found to be evident for 3 of 10 complaints reviewed. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00178267, received on 6/7/22, revealed the following: Staffing is bad at the facility, there are residents that are not getting the care that they need. The staff is working hard to assist the residents however there aren't nearly enough staff to assist them all. Review of complaint MD00187979, received 1/20/23, revealed the following: The majority of the time they are very understaffed . Residents are not being showered .there are times that residents are not changed properly There are residents with wounds that need [to be] packed are not being packed properly. Review of complaint MD00188640, received 2/6/23, revealed the following: The is also working with minimal staff. On 3/06/23 at 2:33 PM, Resident #58 stated that s/he would like a shower once in a while, however, there are not enough staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility 1) failed to ensure that nursing staff signed that the controlled drug count was completed at the change of shift as evidenced by missing signatures on the controlled drug count sheets, and pre-signing of the count sheets; 2) failed to account for all narcotics removed from supply as evidenced by documentation of borrowing narcotics and failure to ensure that two staff witnessed wasting of narcotics; 3) failed to ensure that medications were kept secure in the medication cart as evidenced by the observation of two syringes with insulin in them that were observed on top of an unattended medication cart located in a hallway that residents and visitors would be able to access; and 4) failure to ensure that a medication refrigerator was kept at an acceptable temperature. These observations were found to be evident on 3 out of 4 resident units. The findings include: 1) Narcotic pain medications are potent and effective at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that residents had the right to choose when to take a shower. This was evident for 2 (#21 and #19) of 21 residents reviewed for choices. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives the resident's care planning activities. 1. On 3/16/23 at 5:49 AM, Resident #21 was heard requesting a shower from Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #38 and she replied that it was too early for a shower. Further observation revealed that GNA #38 was walking in the 200 hallway and looked in a few rooms and then sat down at the computer in the hallway. GNA #38 was interviewed at this time and she reported she was completing her documentation. A medical record review for Resident #21 on 3/17/23 at 8:04 AM revealed that Resident #21 was legally blind. A Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff notified the physician that a pressure wound was continuing to worsen and develop possible signs of an infection. This was found for 1 (#51) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: On 3/21/23, review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility in 2020' Review of the progress notes revealed that, on 1/11/22, a stage 2 pressure ulcer was identified on the resident's coccyx. The physician was notified and treatment orders were implemented. The coccyx, or tailbone, is located at the base of the spine. Review of the Weekly Skin Measurement assessment, dated 1/11/22, revealed the stage 2 pressure ulcer was 2 cm in length and 1 cm in width with no depth, the wound bed was red with no exudate (drainage) or pain. A classification of Stage 2 for a pressure ulcer indicates partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis (second layer of skin) presenting as a shallow open ulcer. The wound bed is viable,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received the written Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage prior to the date the services were to end. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #132) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. The findings include: Review of Resident #132's medical record revealed the resident was admitted in November 2022 for rehabilitation following a hospitalization. On 3/10/23 at 2:01 PM, the Assistant Administrator confirmed that Resident #132 did go private pay before the actual discharge. On 3/10/23, review of the SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review sheet completed by the facility revealed the resident's last covered day of Part A Service was 1/2/23 and the termination was determined by a facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted. In the section of the review form for the facility to document if a SNF ABN (Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) or a NOMNC (Notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, it was determined the facility 1) failed to report an allegation of an injury of unknown injury to the State Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the abuse allegation was made, and 2) failed to report the results of the investigation no later than 5 working days after the incident. This was evident for 2 (#134, #130) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) On 3/17/22 at 10:00 AM, a review of facility reported incident MD00180828 revealed, that on 3/22/22 at 3:15 PM, Resident #134 reported to a nurse that a GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) had verbally abused him/her. On the self-report form, the facility documented that the date and time of the incident was 3/22/22 at night, and reported by the resident on 3/23/22 at 2:15 PM. The email confirmation of the facility's report to the state agency documented that the allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency on 3/24/22 at 8:06 AM. The facility failed to report the allegation of abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility reported incident investigations and interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, including an injury of unknown injury. This was evident for 2 (#134, #130) of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1) On 3/17/22 at 10:00 AM, a review of facility reported incident MD00180828 revealed, that on 3/22/22 at 3:15 PM, Resident #134 reported to someone that a GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) had verbally abused him/her. On the self-report form, the facility documented the date and time of the incident was 3/22/22 at night and reported by the resident on 3/23/22 at 2:15 PM. The facility's report did not identify who the resident reported the allegation of abuse to. The facility's report documented that Resident #134's mother was interviewed, however, review of the facility's investigations failed to identify who the resident's mother was, and there was no documentation of an interview or statement from the resident's mother in the documentation of the facility's investigation. The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document the information conveyed to a receiving acute care provider when a resident was transferred there emergently. This was evident for 2 (#3, #133) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 3/14/23 at 1:00 PM, a review of Resident #3's medical record documented that, on 2/26/23, Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital emergency department following a change in his/her medical condition. On 2/26/23 at 6:34 PM in an SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Request) (a standard way to communicate medical information) note, the nurse documented Resident #3 had a change in condition related to abdominal pain, constipation, or impaction and that the primary care provider was notified and recommended that Resident #3 be transferred to the emergency room. On 2/26/23 at 7:21 PM, in a Nurse's Note, the nurse indicated that Resident #3's oxygen level was fluctuating 85-88% on 4 Liters of oxygen, and documented the resident had lower abdominal pain and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to orient, prepare, and document a resident's preparation for a transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 2 (#3, #133) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/14/23 at 1:00 PM, a review of Resident #3's medical record documented that, on 2/26/23, Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital emergency department following a change in his/her medical condition. On 2/26/23 at 6:34 PM in an SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Request) (a standard way to communicate medical information) note, the nurse documented that Resident #3 had a change in condition related to abdominal pain, constipation, or impaction; the primary care provider was notified and recommended that Resident #3 be transferred to the emergency room. On 2/26/23 at 7:21 PM, in a Nurse's Note, the nurse indicated that Resident #3's oxygen level was fluctuating 85-88% on 4 Liters of oxygen and documented the resident had lower abdominal pain and no bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0642 — isolatedEnsure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the individual who completed a portion of the Minimum Data Set assessment signed and ceritified the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #136, and #7) out of 46 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 3/15/23, review of Resident # 136's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses that include, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease. Review of the MDS with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/26/22, Section Z0400 Signature of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a PASSAR during the original admission period for a resident. This was found to be true for 1 (Resident #38) of 3 residents reviewed for PASSARS during the investigation phase of the annual survey. The findings include: PASSAR=Preadmission Screening and Resident Review required by Medicaid certified nursing home facilities to evaluate all applicants for serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID) or related conditions (RC) in order to prevent inappropriate admissions for long term care. During a review of the hard copy medical record on 03/07/23 at 1:30 PM, the surveyor failed to locate a copy of the original for Resident #38's PASSAR, dated 10/05/18. On 3/16/23 at approximately 2:00 PM, the surveyor interviewed the social services worker # 8 regarding the responsibility for the completion of the PASSAR when applicable during the initial admission process. The responsibility for initiating the form, completion of the form, and retention of the PASSAR form is the responsibility of the social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safety of a cognitively impaired resident by failing to provide adequate supervision as evidenced by the resident was found on the floor 8 times and had 3 falls in a 20-day period. This was evident for 1 (#71) of 4 residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: Care plan - is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. MDS (Minimum Data Set) - is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) - is a test used to get a quick snapshot of cognitive function and is a required screening tool used in nursing homes to assess cognition. A score of 13-15 points indicates an intact cognition, 8-12 points indicates moderately impaired cognition, and 0-7 points indicates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff assessed and developed a care plan to address a resident's needs related to dialysis; and failed to ensure staff completed pre and post dialysis assessments. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #136) out of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. The findings include: On 3/15/23, review of Resident # 136's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease. The resident also had orders, in effect since 12/22/22, for dialysis Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday or as scheduled. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/26/22, failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident was receiving dialysis. The Section O Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, which includes areas to document if the resident received services in the past 14 days either while a resident, or if newly admitted while not a resident. This section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that alternatives to side rails were attempted prior to the initation of side rails. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #46, #27 and #7) out 3 residents reviewed for side rails. The findings include: 1) On 3/9/23, review of Resident #7's medical record revealed that the resident resided at the facility for more than a year. The resident had cognitive impairment as evidenced by a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status ) score of 5 out of 15 in August 2022 and again in February 2023. The resident was deemed unable to make health care decisions by two physicians on 5/24/21. Further review of the medical record revealed a current order for the use of siderails, a care plan for potential risk for injury secondary to the use of side rails. A Consent for Use of Side Rails was signed by the resident and licensed practical nurse #9. The date next to Nurse #9's signature was 5/21/21. Review of the side rail assessment, with an observation date of 5/21/21, and a completion date on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that performance reviews were completed for nurse aides at least once every 12 months. This was found to be evident for 3 (Staff #30, #31 and #33) out of 3 nursing assistants reviewed for annual evaluation. The findings include: Review of nursing assistant #30's employee file on 3/16/23 revealed a hire date in October 2017. No documentation was found to indicate that an annual evaluation was completed during the last 12 months. Review of nursing assistant #31's employee file on 3/16/23 revealed a hire date in December 2019. No documentation was found to indicate that an annual evaluation was completed during the last 12 months. Review of nursing assistant #33's employee file on 3/20/23 revealed an original hire date in December 2018. No documentation was found to indicate that an annual evaluation was completed during the last 12 months. On 3/20/23 at noon, the Director of Nursing reported that she could locate an annual evaluation for Staff# 33 for 2022.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff received training related to caring for residents with behavioral health care needs. This was found to be evident for 3 (Staff #30, #31 and #18 ) out of 3 staff reviewed for training related to behavioral health. The findings include: Review of nursing assistant #30's employee file on 3/16/23 revealed a hire date in October 2017. No documentation was found to indicate that staff #30 received behavioral health training. Review of nursing assistant #31's employee file on 3/16/23 revealed a hire date in December 2019. No documentation was found to indicate that staff #31 received behavioral health training. Review of hospitality aid #18's employee file on 3/16/23 revealed a hire date in October 2022. No documentation of education was found in the employee file. This failure to have documentation of education for Staff# 18 was reviewed with the Director of Nursing on 3/16/23 at 4:50 PM. On 3/22/23 at 3:46 PM, surveyor informed the Regional Director of Clinical Operations that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by failing to ensure that prescribed medications had adequate parameters in place to indicate when to administer as needed medications for pain; and failed to ensure documentation of the indication for use of an as needed narcotic pain medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization and 1(Resident #7) out of 6 residents selected for unnecessary medication review . The findings include 1) A review of Resident #3's medical record was conducted on 3/14/23 at 1:00 PM. Review of Resident #3's physician orders revealed an order for 1) Tramadol (Opioid pain medication) 50 MG (milligrams) tablet, give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain, initiated on 3/8/23 and documented as given on 3/9/23 at 10:36 AM for pain level 6, and 2) a 3/8/23 order for Tylenol (Acetaminophen) (pain medication) 325 MG tablet, give two tablets by mouth every 6 hours as need for pain. There was no clear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an as needed psychotropic medication order was limited to 14 days. This was found to be evident for one (#8) out of three residents reveiwed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 6/16/23 at approximately 2:00 PM, review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an active order, originally written on 5/29/23, for Lorazepam 0.5 mg to be given by mouth every 8 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety/aggitation. Review of the Medication Administration Record revealed a dose of the PRN Lorazepam was administered on 6/13/23 at 5:20 PM and again on 6/14/23 at 6:27 PM. Lorazepam is a benzodiazepine which are psychotropic medications. On 6/16/23 at 2:45 PM, surveyor reveiwed the concern with the Director of Nursing (DON) that the PRN Lorazepam order was in effect for more than 2 weeks. The DON acknowledged surveyor's concern. On 6/20/23, further review of the medical record revealed the 5/29/23 PRN order for the Lorazepam was discontinued on 6/16/23 at 4:46 PM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement infection control policies and procedures to ensure that laundry was processed in a way that prevents cross contamination and that, once placed on a linen cart the clean laundry remained covered and was not used to store personal items within the linens on the cart. This was evident for 1 of 1 laundry room and 1 of 4 linen closets on the nursing units. The findings include: On 3/17/23 at 8:49 AM, a review of the facility's policy titled, Departmental (Environmental Services) - Laundry and Linen revealed under section titled, Washing Linens and other Soiled Items #6 read to keep soiled and clean linen, and their respective hampers and laundry carts, separate at all times. #7 read, clean linens will remain hygienically clean (free of pathogens in sufficient numbers to cause human illness) through measure designated to protect it from environmental contamination, such as covering clean linen carts. 1) An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, review of policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that the flu vaccine and pneumonia vaccine was offered to each resident and that the residents/resident representatives received education regarding the vaccines. This was evident for 3 (#46, #21, and #48) of 5 residents reviewed for flu vaccinations and 4 (#46, #58, and #21) of 5 residents reviewed for the pneumonia vaccinations. The findings include: 1. On 3/17/23 at 8:50 AM, a review of the facility's policy titled, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine revealed a policy statement that read, All residents and employees who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. The facility shall provide pertinent information about the significant risks and benefits of vaccines to staff and residents (or residents' legal representatives) . In the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation under #1. Between October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-22 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that their, 1) residents were offered the COVID 19 vaccination, resident and/or resident representatives were educated and that the education was documented in the resident's medical record and 2) staff were offered the COVID 19 vaccination, educated and that they maintained records of the education provided. This was evident for 5 (#46, #10, #58, #21, and #48) of 5 residents and 12 (#52, #5, #53, #54, #55, #19, #50, #57, #58, #22, #18, and #12) of 12 staff reviewed for COVID 19 vaccinations. The findings include: On 3/17/23 at 8:49 PM, a review of the facility's policies and procedures was conducted regarding how they would ensure that residents and staff would receive education regarding the risk and benefits of the COVID 19 vaccination and when supplies were available, offer their staff and residents the COVID 19 vaccinations as mandated. Facility staff were provided a list of polices and procedures for the survey team…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-22 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that 100% of staff were fully vaccinated, had an approved exemption, or had a temporary delay to receive the vaccination and/or was not eligible for the required second dose. This was evidenced by a 93% vaccination rate with 8 (#5, #54, #55, #19, #50, #57, #58, and #18) of 109 staff had not been fully vaccinated, received an approved exemption, or had a temporary delay. The findings include: On 3/21/23 at 10:00 AM, a review of the facility's Policy, COVID 19 Vaccination Mandate and Exemption was conducted. The policy had a revision date of 1/1/22, but the facility failed to provide a date that the policy had been implemented. The policy read, It shall be the policy of [facility name] to meet the COVID-19 vaccine mandate guidelines as issued by the governor of [state] Department of Health. To follow was the Procedures section. In this section, the facility wrote that newly hired staff will be mandated to receive the vaccination and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-03-22 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility assessment and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the faciltiy assesment addressed the staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. This has the potential to affect all of the residents. The findings include: On 3/22/23 at approximately 4:00 PM, review of the facility assessment failed to reveal documentation regarding staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. On 3/22/23 at 4:15 PM, the Regional Director of Clinical Operations #64 (who was previously the Director of Nursing) reported that she had created the binder and structure of the facility assessment about four or five years ago. She reported that the Administrator and Director of Nursing were responsible for updating at the time of the interview. Surveyor reviewed the concern that the assessment failed to reveal documentation regarding staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215073. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.