No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Laurelwood Healthcare Center

100 Laurel Drive, Elkton, MD 21921 · For profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (410) 398-8800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (410) 398-8800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 actual-harm citation$95,610 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $95,610 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
719 N Bridge St · (410) 398-5930 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
707 N Bridge St · (410) 398-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Elkton Maryland · (410) 344-7380 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.8%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms45.7%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.3%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.3%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%5.9%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.5%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.3%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.9%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.8%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.7%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.811.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.541.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 112 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.7%CMS range 42.4–64.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.3–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.2–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
42.0%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 99.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 63 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the facility investigation, record review, and interview. It was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe environment to prevent a fall with injury causing actual harm (Resident #102 ), and failed to provide supervision to prevent an elopement (Resident #18 and #106). This was evident in 3 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/31/24 at 8:38 AM a review of complaint MD00204146, that was received by the State Survey Agency (SA), alleged that Resident #102 was unable to walk or move out of bed. The complaint alleged that staff were changing Resident #102 and apparently dropped Resident #102 resulting in a broken hip. On 7/31/24 at 8:38 AM a review of Resident #102's medical record was conducted and revealed Resident #102 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses that included heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic pain. The medical record further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0917 — widespread
    Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide individual closet space that keeps a resident's clothing separate from their roommates. This was found to be evident in all double occupancy rooms in the facility.The findings include:On 1/29/2026 at 10:20 AM, License Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 was interviewed regarding resident furniture in rooms. LPN #7 stated that in double occupancy rooms, residents share one large dresser that has 5 drawers, each resident gets their own side table with 2 drawers, and both residents share one closet.On 01/29/2026 at 10:53 AM, observations of double occupancy rooms 120, 128, 215, 221, 225, 228, and 229 revealed that there was no physical separation of items in the room closet shared by residents. On 01/29/2026 at 10:59 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #16 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident #16 stated that they shared the closet space with their roommate. No partition was noted inside the closet to separate roommates' belongings.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and facility staff interview, the facility staff failed to protect and value a resident's right to religious freedom (residents #18, 40, 43, 81, 83, and 91). This was evident for 6 out of residents reviewed for resident rights during a recertification survey.The findings include: Review of complaint # 2676017 on 1/19/26 at 10:30am revealed a complaint from a eucharistic minister stating that he/she was unable to provide communion to Catholic residents because the facility has failed to provide the eucharistic minister with an accurate list of Catholic residents for approximately 2 years. Interview with eucharistic minister # 25 on 1/20/25 at 10:17am revealed eucharistic minister attempted to obtain an accurate list of Catholic residents since October 2025. Eucharistic minister #25 normally sends an email to the Administrator and the Activity Director approximately 4 days before he/she will visit the facility. Since March 2025, eucharistic minister #25 alleged that he/she has not recieved an accurate list of Catholic residents so he/she has been unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, homelike environment as evidenced by multiple sliding closet doors being broken and not being able to close properly. This was found to be evident in rooms 120, 128, 215, 221, 225, 228, and 229.The findings include:On 1/29/2026 at 10:53 AM, a tour of the facility revealed sliding closet doors were used in resident rooms. In rooms 120, 128, 215, 221, 225, 228, and 229, the closet doors were observed to no longer be attached to the top tracks that would allow the doors to open and close properly. Multiple closet doors in these rooms were observed to be prop up against the inside walls of the closets.On 01/29/2026 at 11:05 AM, the rooms were toured with the Maintenance Director (MD) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The MD stated the facility often must repair closet doors because they currently do not have bottom tracks and often get hit by equipment like wheelchairs that knock them off the top tracks. Surveyor concern with closet doors was addressed with the NHA at this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a significant medication error. This was evident for 1 (#343957) of 7 complaints reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include:Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered activities throughout each month based on the comprehensive care plan and activity interest. This was evident for 1 (#2586001) of 7 complaints reviewed during an annual survey.The findings include:On 01/23/2026 at 10:34 AM, review of anonymous complaint #2586001 revealed that Resident #32 felt bored at the facility.On 01/23/2026 at 10:37 AM, review of Resident 32's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE].At the same time, further review of Resident #32's medical record revealed a document titled, Activity Preferences Interview, dated 7/12/2025 which indicated that the resident was interested in several activities such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staffing information was complete and was not missing information. This was evident for 2 out of 2 units observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 1/29/2026 at 9:01 AM, an observation of the nurse staffing boards in both units was made. Staffing boards on both units had the accurate date, Facility Name, and Census. There were no actual hours worked for either Nurses or Nursing Assistant on either of the boards.On 1/29/2026 at 9:14 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. This surveyor made the DON aware of the nurse staff postings not having the hours worked for nursing staff. The DON stated that they will address the boards and was not aware of the requirement.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a significant medication error. This was evident for 1 (#343957) of 7 complaints reviewed during an annual survey.The findings include:On 01/22/2026 at 11:06 AM, review of anonymous complaint #343957 revealed that Resident #27 was sent to the hospital following the administration of an incorrect methadone dose.Methadone is a medication used to treat addiction to controlled, strong pain medications. Taking too much or not as ordered can result in overdose which can cause life-threatening symptoms such as slow or irregular breathing, extreme sleepiness, and confusion.On 01/23/2026 at 8:44 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing confirm the incident did occur to Resident #27. She indicated that the resident was ordered two separate dose amounts for the morning and evening administration (a larger dose in the morning), and that the resident received the morning dose in the evening. She further indicated it was an agency Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) who made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the surveyor's observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it had qualified staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out food and nutrition services. This was evidenced by the lack of qualified staff and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: Full-time means working 35 or more hours a week. Part-time employees typically work fewer hours in a day or during a work week than full-time employees. The U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics uses a definition of 34 or fewer hours a week as part-time work. On 07/22/24 at 09:32 AM, an Interview with the Culinary Director (Staff #11) revealed that he/she has been working for the past two years as the Culinary Director and does not have a Certificate in Dietary Management (CDM). He/she enrolled in the CDM course and can provide the registration. Staff #11 also stated that the Registered Dietician (RD) supervises the kitchen and works at the facility four days a week, adding, My understanding is that as long as the Dietician is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the surveyor's observation and Interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety requirements. This was identified during multiple observations of the kitchen food service operations during the recertification/complaint survey and has the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: The surveyor's kitchen initial observation on 07/22/24 at 09:32 AM revealed ice plaques on plastic freezer curtain strips in the freezer room. Icicles were noted on the black cord connecting the freezer and freezer door. Icicles noted behind condenser connection. Several icy spots were noted on the floor of the freezer room (they appear like black ice, making them hard to notice), and some icy spots were noted on the ceiling of the Freezer room. On 07/22/24 at 09:35 AM, a pile of untilted dessert bowls was noted on the countertop near the dishwashing area. Above the untitled dessert bowls, a non-functional wall-mounted insect light trap was noted. Black dust particles were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-08 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the surveyor's observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the guidelines and the facility's policy for storing food brought in by family or visitors and distinguishing it from the facility's food. This was evidenced by observations of residents' food storage brought in by family and visitors and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 07/24/24 at 11 AM, an interview with the unit Manager (Staff # 23) revealed that the refrigerator located in the nourishment room next to the Nurses' station is used for the purpose of saving any supplements, sandwiches for residents, and any food brought by the residents' family or visitors. He/She also stated that the food is always labeled and will be removed after three days. On 07/24/24 at 11:12 AM, the surveyor observed food in the refrigerator at unit A in a paper bag with the resident's name on it but no date. Surveyor also observed an unlabeled container with a smoothie-like drink and an unlabeled open water bottle. The unit manager (Staff # 23) was not able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to provide residents a dignified existence (Resident #20, #50, #121, #594, #595, #596, #597, #598 and #599). This was evident for 9 of 42 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Review of a complaint from Resident #121's responsible party (RP) revealed the RP stated the Resident was forced to share a bathroom with a member of the opposite sex. Review of Resident #121's medical record on 8/2/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on 8/5/24 at 8:00 AM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] has a shared bathroom with room [ROOM NUMBER]. Further observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] and 121's shared bathroom revealed there are no locks on the interior bathroom doors leading from the bathroom to rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] to provide privacy from residents of the opposite sex. Observation on 8/5/24 at 8:00 AM of all the resident rooms and shared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 63 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaints, medical record review, policy review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff 1) failed to notify the physician in a timely manner when a resident had a fall and weight loss and, 2) failed to notify the responsible party when there was a significant change in weight and a change in residents condition. This was evident for 1 (#102) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents and 3 (#247, #125, #133) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition and significant change in condition The findings include: 1) On 7/31/24 at 8:38 AM a review of complaint MD00204146, that was received by the State Survey Agency (SA), alleged that Resident #102 was unable to walk or move out of bed. The complaint alleged that staff were changing Resident #102 and apparently dropped Resident #102 resulting in a broken hip. On 7/31/24 at 8:38 AM a review of Resident #102's medical record was conducted and revealed a physician's progress note dated 3/25/24 which revealed the physician saw Resident #102 for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment. This was evident throughout the facility during the surveyor's environmental tour. The findings include: On 7/30/24 at 9:02AM the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER] and observed an area of unpainted spackling felt to be soft and movable on the wall approximately 4.5ft long by 1.5ft tall adjacent to the resident's window. The resident's television was observed to only have one working tv channel with a fuzzy appearance to the screen. The dresser furniture was observed to have a broken drawer handle on the top drawer which was dangling. Upon observation of the shared bathroom, the surveyor noted the following: one ceiling tile containing a plastic air vent with a bowed appearance and 0.5in separation present, approximately a 1ft long by 3in tall brown stain on the ceiling tile containing the light fixture, one missing ceramic wall tile below the toilet paper dispenser with exposed wall board, one broken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview with staff and facility reported incidents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, injuries of unknown origin, an elopement and unwitnessed fall were reported to the state agency within required timeframe. This was evident for 3 (Resident #101, #27, #129) of 26 residents reviewed for the facility's self-reported incidents and 1 (#102) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 1) On 7/24/24 at 2:46 PM, a review of facility-reported incident MD00179979 revealed that on 6/23/22 Resident #101 alleged that the resident did not receive care timely when he/she had respiratory issue. Further review of Resident #101's statement for the incident on 7/24/24 at 3:00 PM revealed that the resident pushed the call bell several times for help because his/her oxygen bottle was empty and he/she did not get any oxygen through his/her nasal cannula on 6/23/22 around 5:45 AM. Resident #101 also reported that a nursing staff member approached him/her around 6:23 AM. The review of Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews and a review of facility-reported incident investigations, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, neglect, injury of unknown origin, unusual occurrence, elopements, and falls. This was evident for 9 (Resident #18, #101, #109, #112, #20, #27, #129 and #102) of 26 residents reviewed for facility self-reported incidents and 1 (#102) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1)A portion of reviewing the facility reported incident MD00188036 on 7/22/24 at 12:04 PM revealed that Resident #18 exited the facility building without staff knowledge and was found outside of the building by other residents' family member on 1/20/23 around 5:45 PM. Further review of the facility's investigation revealed that the facility's investigation documentation contained that Resident #18 had a wander guard applied after the incident, care plan revised, psychology followed-up, and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and a complaint, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop, initiate and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plans for residents. This was evident for 7 (Resident #35,#30, #92, #72, #247, #125 and #113) of 87 residents reviewed for care plan during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Legal blindness is visual acuity less than 20/200, but to fit the definition, the person must not be able to attain 20/200 vision even with prescription eyewear. Normal vision is 20/20. That means you can clearly see an object 20 feet away. If you're legally blind, your vision is 20/200 or less in your better eye or your field of vision is less than 20 degrees. That means if an object is 200 feet away, you have to stand 20 feet from it to see it clearly. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility staff: 1) failed to hold care plan meetings for residents and/or their representatives (Resident #38, #35, #14, and #15) and 2) failed to revise and update resident's comprehensive care plan (Resident #14, #15, #72) . This was evident for 5 of 87 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident ' s care. The Minimum Data Set ( MDS is a complete assessment of the resident, which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and modify the care plan based on the resident's status. A care plan is a guide that addresses each resident's unique needs. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 7/23/2024 at 9:27…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident of the changes to his/ her treatment plan. This was evident for 1(Resident #21) of 6 residents reviewed for residents' care during the survey. The findings include: Hepatitis C is an inflammation of the liver caused by the hepatitis C virus. The virus can cause both acute and chronic hepatitis, ranging in severity from a mild illness to a serious, lifelong illness including liver cirrhosis and cancer. Brief Interview for Mental Status, BIMS, is a screening tool used to assess basic cognitive function in patients in long-term care facilities. On 7/22/24 at 10:04 AM, in an interview with Resident #21, he/she expressed concern that the facility staff didn't notify him/her of the results every time he underwent laboratory tests. Resident #21 added that one of his/her medications was stopped without notice. On 7/23/24 at 3:09 PM, further review of the medical record indicated that Resident #21's BIMS assessed on 4/29/24 scored 14 of 15, cognitively intact. On 7/24/24 at 2:57 PM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a complaint, observation, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. This was evident for 2 (#6, #134) of 87 residents reviewed during a recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: A Hoyer lift is an assistive device used to help persons with mobility challenges get in and out of bed. It allows a person to be lifted and transferred with a minimum of physical effort between a bed and a chair and vice versa. 1) On 7/23/2024 11:22 AM, surveyor observed Resident #6 sitting in a bariatric wheelchair and working with therapy in their room. On 8/6/2024 at 12:40 PM, an interview was conducted with the Area Manager for Therapy (Staff #35). Staff #35 stated that Resident #6 was currently on PT (physical therapy) case load and PT has been working with the resident since January 2024 for bed mobility and transfers. Staff #35 further stated that the resident required standby assist for bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to convey resident funds to a resident at discharge (Resident #104). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #104's medical record on 8/1/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from another facility and discharged to the hospital on 3/6/24. The Resident did not return to the facility after discharge. Further review of Resident #104's medical record revealed on 3/4/24 the previous facility the Resident resided in sent a check to the facility for $2132.12 payable to the Resident and evidence the Resident's RFMS (Resident Fund Management Service) account was closed by the previous facility on 3/4/24. Further review of Resident #104's medical record revealed on 3/14/24 the facility staff sent back a check to the previous facility for $2132.12 even though Resident #104 was not a resident at that facility. During interview with the Business Office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that resident/resident's representative was offered the opportunity to develop advance directives and/or provided information regarding advance directives. This was evident for 2 (Resident #14, #15) of 4 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used for documenting a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure advance written notification to residents was issued when the facility determined that residents no longer qualified for Medicare part A skilled services. This was evident for 3 out of 3 residents (#46, #25, and #248) reviewed during the surveyor's beneficiary protection notification review during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 7/26/24 at 2:55PM the surveyor provided three Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms and requested them to be completed for Residents #248, #46, and #25 to Registered Nurse #30. On 7/29/24 at 9:08AM the surveyor requested to the facility's Director of Nursing, that the forms be completed and returned to the surveyor. On 7/29/24 at 9:15AM the surveyor notified the facility Administrator that the forms had not been completed or returned. At this time, the surveyor conducted an interview with the facility Administrator who provided the following response regarding notices issued to residents: We don't have them.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure secure storage of resident records and personal information. This was evident during the surveyor's exterior environment tour of the facility's grounds during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 7/30/24 at approximately 11:20AM the surveyor conducted an exterior environmental tour of the facility's grounds and observed two exterior doors to the facility which were ajar, unlocked, and able to be opened. One out of two openly accessible areas was found to be a storage area with therapy related medical equipment in disarray, with a two drawer metal filing cabinet present, and two oversized cardboard banker boxes stacked on top, observed to be completely filled with various medical documents with resident personal information present. The surveyor observed and noted the following was present: bad medicare debt documents, resident information including names, admission dates, and lists with social security numbers present, room numbers, letters from the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the facility's self-reported incident, residents' medical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent incident of abuse that was related to a resident kissing an opposite-gender resident who did not want to. This was evident for one (Resident #16) of 13 abuse investigations, including complaints and facility-reported incidents. The findings include: A review of the facility reported incident MD00205715 on 8/01/24 at 9:00 AM revealed that a sexual abuse alleged on 5/14/24 by Resident #98 kissed Resident #16 (an opposite gender resident) on his/her lip, which Resident #16 did not consent to. On 8/01/24 at 9:27 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #98 and #16. Resident #98's medical records revealed the resident was alert and oriented. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status: an assessment used in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities to monitor cognition) was 12 out of 15 on 3/26/24. Also, Resident #98's records showed that a social worker ( Staff #5) wrote a progress note on 5/15/24 (late entry; the note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the abuse policy by failing to timely report and conduct a thorough investigation of alleged abuse and a documented unwitnessed fall with injury. This was evident for 1 (#129) of 26 facility reported incidents reviewed and 1 (#102) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: On 7/22/24 at 9:25 AM an entrance conference was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the [NAME] President of Clinical Operations. The entrance conference sheet was provided which included a request for a copy of the Abuse Policy. Review of the Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation Policy revealed, IV. Identification of incidents and allegations 2. The following procedure will assist the staff in the identification of incidents and direct them to appropriate steps of intervention. A. Each occurrence of resident incident, bruise, abrasion or injury of unknown source; or report of alleged abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative (RP) in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 2 (#38, #4) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) During an initial screen of Resident #38 on 7/23/2024 at 9:37 AM, the resident stated that s/he was sent out to the hospital on 6/28/2024. On 7/23/2024 at 1:48 PM a review of nurses' progress notes and change in condition documentation revealed Resident #38 was sent to the ED (emergency department) on 6/28/2024 at 2206H (10:26 PM) via 911. On 7/24/2024 at 12:17 PM an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3). Regarding written notification of reason for transfer to the hospital, LPN #3 stated that s/he was not aware that they had to give the resident and/or family written notification of reason for transfer to the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to offer a Bed-hold notice to the resident or resident's representative before the facility transferred a resident to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #72) of 4 resident records reviewed for hospitalization during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Bed hold notice includes providing written information to the resident and bed charges, including the duration of the bed hold until the resident is permitted to return to the nursing facility. On 07/23/24 at 10:44 AM, an interview with (resident #72) revealed that he/she went to the Hospital unplanned, recently in January and April of 2024. The resident further confirmed that no one at the facility informed him/her about the bed hold policy. On 07/26/24 at 11:16 AM, medical record review of the INTERACT transfer assessment and the resident's progress notes revealed that the behold policy was not discussed with the resident or given a copy, prior to sending the resident to the hospital. 07/29/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (#38, #125) of 82 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. Ventilator (Vent) /Ventilator support: A ventilator (Vent) is a machine that helps you breathe or breathes for you. Oxygen therapy is a treatment that provides you with extra oxygen to breathe in. It is also called supplemental oxygen. It is only available through a prescription from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility to refer residents to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #30) of 2 residents reviewed for PASSAR during the annual survey. The findings include: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASARR requires that 1) all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility be evaluated for serious mental disorder and/or intellectual disability; 2) be offered the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting); and 3) receive the services they need in those settings. On 7/24/24 at 9:02 AM a review of Resident #30's records revealed a PASSAR Level I screening form dated 3/10/22 which indicated that the resident should have been referred for a Level II evaluation. No Level II PASSAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice by failing to ensure staff followed physician orders for administration of medications and documentation. This was evident for 2 (Resident #41, #66) of 4 residents observed for medication administration during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 7/31/2024 at 9:48 AM, surveyors met the nurse, Registered Nurse, RN #8, at a medication cart on the A-Wing Unit. RN #8 reported he was preparing medications for Resident #41. Surveyors observed RN #8 remove from the medication cart and give Resident #41 their morning meds including the following: 1 tab Senna Plus and 1 Acidophilus (probiotic). On 7/31/2024 at 10:55 AM, surveyors observed RN #8 pulled administer Resident #66 their morning meds including the following: 1 tab Metformin 500 mg. The medication Topiramate 25 mg was not available. RN #8 informed Resident #66 that they were going to follow up with the doctor. He stated that the medication was re-ordered but not delivered by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement an ongoing program of activities based on the abilities, interests and treatment needs of a resident that resided in the facility. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 82 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Dementia is a general term to describe a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells, or neurons. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide medication and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice (Resident #110, #120 and #134) and 2) failed to have an order for the management of oxygen for a resident on oxygen therapy (Resident #133). This was evident during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) The facility staff failed to monitor Resident #110's blood sugars per hospital's nursing report. Review of Resident #110's medical record on 7/30/24 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with a diagnosis to include uncontrolled diabetes. Diabetes is a long-term medical condition in which your body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in unusual blood sugar levels. Review of Resident #110's May 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the facility staff was monitoring the Resident's blood sugar before meals and at bedtime prior to the administration of insulin, 4 times a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to change a resident's urinary catheter and drainage bag and failed to follow discharge orders from an acute care facility to arrange for a resident with a foley catheter to be seen by an outpatient urologist (Resident #48), and 2) failed to monitor and empty a urinary drainage bag as ordered (Resident #70). This was evident for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A urologist is a doctor that specializes in the study or treatment of the function and disorder of the urinary system. A urinary (foley) catheter is a flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine. 1) On 7/22/2024 at 1:49 PM, Resident #48 was observed in bed with a urinary catheter bag hanging on the right side of their bedframe. In an interview with the resident s/he stated that the urinary catheter was placed a long time ago and has not been changed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to have a process in place to address weight loss in a timely manner (Resident #247, #125). and 2) failed to monitor a resident's nutritional status by documenting their eating amount every shift and developing a care plan (Resident #103). This was evident for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/30/24 at12:30 PM review of complaint MD00186837 revealed a concern that Resident #247 entered the facility at a much higher weight and that the facility failed to monitor the resident's nutritional needs. On 7/30/24 at 12:30 PM Resident #247's medical record was reviewed and revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November 2022 for rehabilitation following hospitalization. The resident was in the facility for 37 days until discharge home in December 2022. Review of the weight section of Resident #247's medical record revealed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of employee records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had competency evaluations upon hire. This was evident for 5 (Registered Nurse #50, #51, Geriatric Nursing Assistant #16, #48, and #49) of 5 randomly selected nursing staff reviewed for competencies. The findings include: Nursing competence is defined by the American Nurses Association as an expected level of performance that integrates knowledge, skills, abilities, and judgment. On 7/26/24 at 11:08 AM, a telephone Interview with the staffing coordinator (Staff #13) revealed that the facility had no official educator. Staff #13 explained that training was conducted by the staffing coordinator, Director of Nursing (DON), or Human Resources (HR). Staff #13 stated that an orientation packet, including their skills checklist, was provided to the new hires and then given to the DON once completed. He/she added that after the orientation, competency training is done yearly. On 7/26/24 at 12:50 PM, a review of nursing employee records revealed the following: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of employee records and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct performance reviews of Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs)at least once every 12 months. This was evident for 3 ( GNA #16, #48, and#49) of 3 randomly selected GNAs' records reviewed for annual training requirements during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings: On 7/26/24 at 12:50 PM, a review of randomly selected 3 GNAs' records revealed the following: 1. GNA #16 was hired in January 2022- no annual performance review found. 2. GNA #48 was hired in March 2013. no annual performance review was found. 3. GNA #49 was hired in May 2020- no annual performance review found. On 7/29/24 at 1:53 PM, in an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), who is also a staff educator (RN #14), she stated that the nursing staff are evaluated annually by the Director of Nursing (DON). On 7/30/24 at 10:35 AM, during an interview with the DON, the surveyor shared concerns that the employees' personal files did not contain annual performance reviews. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater. This was found to be evident based on errors identified during medication administration for 2 (Resident #41, #66) of 4 residents observed. The observations were made on two of two nursing units and involved one of three different nurses. The findings include: On 7/31/2024 at 9:48 AM, surveyors met the nurse, Registered Nurse, RN #8, at a medication cart on the A-Wing Unit. RN #8 reported s/he was preparing medications for Resident #41. RN #8 was observed removing the following medications from the medication cart: 1 Acetaminophen 650 mg 1 Senna Plus 1 Eliquis 2.5 mg 1 Amlodipine 5 mg 1 Acidophilus (probiotic) 1 Metoprolol ER 25 mg, and Med Plus 2.0 Vanilla nutritional drink, 120 ml (supplement). RN #8 then gave the medications to resident #41. On 7/31/2024 at 10:55 AM, surveyors observed RN #8 pulled out from the medication cart the following medications and administered them to Resident #66: 1 Carvedilol 12.5 mg,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined facility staff failed to remove expired medications and patient supplies. This was evident on 1 of 2 nursing units and a central supply room observed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 7/31/2024 at 11:45 AM, A-Wing Unit CMA (Certified Medicine Aide) medication cart was reviewed for medication storage and labeling in the presence of RN #8: Surveyor found in the overflow drawer of the med cart one blister pack of Mirtazapine 15 mg tabs that expired on 7/16/2024 for Resident #49. RN #8 confirmed the findings and showed the expired drugs to the Regional Director of Clinical Operations (Staff #33), who immediately removed them from the med cart. On 8/1/2024 at 10:10 AM, observation was made of the Central Supply room, in the presence of the Central Supplies staff (Staff #9) and A-Wing Unit Manager (UM #23): The following items were found expired: A box of BD vacutainer eclipse blood collection needles expired on 12/06/2017 A Nipro Box of 22 Gauge needles expired on 4/30/2022 A Nipro box of three (3) 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 1 (#102) of 2 residents reviewed for Hospice care and one facility self report (Resident #131) during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On [DATE] at 8:38 AM a review of Resident #102's medical record was conducted and revealed Resident #102 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic pain. The medical record further revealed that Resident #102 was admitted to hospice care in [DATE] due to heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents understood the arbitration agreement. This was evident for 1 signed agreement (for Resident #14) of 3 signed agreements reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 7/22/24 during the entrance conference a request was made for arbitration agreements. On 7/24/24 at 9:08 AM a review of the binding arbitration agreement for Resident #14 revealed that the document was electronically signed by the resident on 9/22/23. On 7/24/24 at 10:41 AM a review of Resident #14's clinical records revealed a certification of capacity form dated 7/24/22 that indicated the resident lacked capacity to make decisions or sign documents due to cognitive impairment. A second capacity form was present in the resident's record that also indicated the resident lacked the ability to make decisions. On 7/24/24 at 12:04 PM an interview with the Admissions Director (Staff #40) regarding arbitration agreements was conducted. Resident #14's arbitration agreement was reviewed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) use proper hand hygiene and 2) use proper personal protective equipment, evident for 1 resident (Resident # 73) of 23 residents reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP). The facility also failed to 3) perform annual revision of Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures, which was evident for 4 of 5 policies and procedures reviewed during the infection control task. The findings include: 1).On 8/05/24 at 10:50 AM an observation of Resident #73's dressing change was conducted. After Wound Nurse (Staff #29) removed the resident's soiled dressing, she removed her dirty gloves and put on clean gloves without performing hand hygiene. On 08/05/24 at 1:03 PM an interview with Staff #29 was conducted. Staff #29 failed to state that handwashing should be performed before and after changing gloves. On 08/06/24 at 10:00 AM an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. He was informed that Staff #29 did not perform hand hygiene before she put on clean gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of employee records and an interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that nursing staff had received annual education on abuse, neglect, exploitation prevention, and misappropriation of resident property along with dementia management and resident abuse prevention . This was evident for 5 (Registered Nurse #50, #51, Geriatric Nurse Assistant #16, #48, and #49) of 5 randomly selected nursing staff reviewed for annual training requirements during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Relias is an online training provider that offers continuing education (CE) for healthcare, senior care, and disabilities professionals. Relias's CE library covers a wide range of topics and is accredited by many national and state licensing boards. Relias's courses are designed to help healthcare workers improve patient care, grow, and provide high-quality care. 1) On 7/26/24 at 11:08 AM, a telephone Interview with staffing coordinator (Staff #13) revealed that the facility had no assigned staff development personnel. Staff #13 added…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify a resident, the resident's representative, and the Long-Term Care State Ombudsman's Office in writing after the facility decided to refuse to readmit a resident that was sent to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00203468 on 03/13/24 revealed an allegation that Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room under emergency petition due to being uncooperative, aggressive, and combative with staff. Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room and cleared for discharge back to the nursing facility on 03/06/24. The facility refused to have Resident #1 return from the hospital on [DATE]. A review of Resident #1's transfer documents on 03/13/24 revealed that Resident #1 was admitted from another long-term care facility on 03/01/24. The new long-term care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of 2 closed medical records and all pertinent administrative policies and procedures, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident nor the resident's representative with written information regarding the facility bed-hold policy. This was evident for 2 (Residents #2 and #3) of 3 residents reviewed for receiving a bed hold policy upon emergent discharge to the hospital. The findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Transfer and Discharge policy on 03/14/24, revealed under section C. Acute Transfer, #4: the resident's bed will be held while the facility representative contacts the resident or responsible party to discuss the bed hold. A letter containing admission/discharge/transfer and appeal rights will be discussed with the resident or responsible party and will be mailed to them as soon as practical. The resident or responsible party will be given the opportunity to continue to hold the bed. The resident's bed will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews of a complaint, a closed clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after a brief hospitalization. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of complaint MD00203468 on 03/13/24 revealed an allegation that Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room under emergency petition due to being uncooperative, aggressive, and combative with staff. Resident #1 was evaluated in the emergency room and cleared for discharge back to the nursing facility on 03/06/24. The facility refused to have Resident #1 return from the hospital on [DATE]. A review of Resident #1's transfer documents on 03/13/24 revealed that Resident #1 was admitted from another long-term care facility on 03/01/24. The new long-term care facility received transfer documents on 03/01/24 that included diagnoses that included: unspecified personality and behavior disorder, a history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyors observations and resident interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect multiple residents. The findings include: 1. On 9/17/2019 at 8:09 AM the men's bathroom in the main dining room was observed with brown stains and cobwebs on the ceiling tiles. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings on 9/18/2019 during the exit conference. 2. During an observational tour on 9/11/19 the following items were identified: An observation of Resident #40's room on 9/11/19 at 12:15 PM revealed Resident #40's wheelchair arm rests were noted to be in disrepair. An observation of Resident #5's room on 9/11/19 at 2:18 PM also revealed wheelchair arm rests were also in disrepair with missing covers and duct tape being applied. In an observation of Resident #68's room on 9/11/19 at 2:47 PM revealed a set of drawers being in disrepair with broken handles and missing screws.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop comprehensive care plans for residents (#94 and #93). This was evident for 2 of 51 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a written guideline of care based on the individual resident's needs developed by an interdisciplinary team which includes nursing, rehabilitation staff, and dietary that communicates to other health care professionals. A written care plan decreases the risk of incomplete, incorrect, or inaccurate care. 1. Resident #94 was admitted to the facility for dementia and pressure ulcer care. On 7/23/19 a urinary drainage catheter was placed in Resident #94's bladder to prevent urine from infecting the healing sacral wound. A care plan meeting was held on 7/30/19. During the care plan meeting the facility failed to develop a care plan for dealing with the urinary drainage catheter. On 9/17/19 at 9:55 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the urinary drainage care plan had not been developed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of 3 previous surveys, and the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan, it was determined that nursing home administration failed to continuously monitor the effectiveness of the interventions required to correct cited deficiencies resulting in 5 repeated citations since 2017. The findings include: The facility QAPI plan has a committee which includes but is not limited to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Medical Director. The committee also includes Regional and Corporate staff as needed. The QAPI committe duties include identifying and undertaking systematic change to eliminate problems after the root cause is determined and develop a feedback and monitoring system to sustain continuous improvement. The following deficiencies were identified and again cited in the 3/30/2017 & 5/24/18 annual surveys, the 3/30-/9 complaint survey, and in the 9/18/2019 annual survey: F684 - Quality of Care - residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of annual surveys for 3/30/2017 & 5/24/018, complaint survey of 3/29/2019, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan failed to effectively implement plans of action and monitor effectiveness to correct identified quality deficiencies. This was for 5 of 36 deficiencies from the 9/18/2019 annual survey that had been previously cited. The findings include: QAPI takes a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving. Quality Assurance (QA) is the specification of standards for quality of service and outcomes, and a process throughout the organization for assuring that care is maintained at acceptable levels in relation to those standards. QA is on-going, both anticipatory and retrospective in its efforts to identify how the organization is performing, including where and why facility performance is at risk or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by the presence of flies. This deficient practice has the potential to impact all residents. The findings include: During surveyor tour of the facility on 9/10/2019, a fruit fly was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:11 PM and in room [ROOM NUMBER] at 1:44 PM. During a tour of the facility's main kitchen on 9/16/2019 at 10:10 AM, two fruit flies were observed in the dry goods room and one housefly was observed hovering over a hotel pan containing ground meat and breadcrumbs on the tray line. Additionally, on 9/17/2019 at 11:13 AM two fruit flies were observed in the B Wing hallway. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of these findings during the exit interview on 9/18/2019.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident (#35) with a lip plate as indicated on the meal ticket. This was evident for 1 of 51 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Surveyor observation of Resident #35's breakfast on 9/11/19 at 8:45 AM, lunch on 9/12/19 and 9/13/19 at 12:30 PM revealed the resident eating his/her meals off a flat white plate. Review of the meal ticket which accompanied the meals revealed Resident #35 was to have a lip plate due to tremors. The tray ticket accompanies the resident's meals from the kitchen to the resident. The tray ticket revealed the type and amount of food to be provided as well as any individualized needs. The tray ticket for Resident #35 revealed the resident needing: lip plate, left angled spoon and fork and sippy cup. The lip plate is designed to assist people with limited muscle control. The deep inner lip keeps food from sliding off the plate as the user brings the fork or spoon to the edge of the plate and pushes the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to promote self-determination for Residents (#56 and #57). This was evident for 2 of 5 residents in the survey sample for choices and 2 of 51 residents selected for review during the survey. The finding includes: 1 A. The facility staff failed to promote self-determination for Resident #56. Medical record review for Resident #56 revealed on 8/1/19 the resident entered Hospice. Hospice care enhances the end of life by providing care that allows people to live their final days to the fullest, in peace and without pain. At that time, the physician ordered: discontinue weights. Further record review revealed the facility staff obtained a weight on Resident #56 on 9/5/19. 1 B. The facility staff failed to promote self-determination for Resident #56. Medical record review for Resident #56 revealed on 8/1/19 the resident entered Hospice. Hospice care enhances the end of life by providing care that allows people to live their final days to the fullest, in peace and without pain. At that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined the nursing staff failed to notify the responsible party of a resident's change in condition requiring hospitalization (Resident #94). This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for notification of change during this survey. The findings included: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility with dementia and other diagnoses. Resident #94 had a spouse who was the responsible party to be notifiied in case of any changes in condition. On 8/18/19 Resident #94 had a change in condition requiring transfer and subsequent admission to the hospital. The facility notified the physician and attempted to call the spouse one time. No other attempt to notify the spouse was recorded in the medical record. On 8/19/19 Resident #94's spouse came to the facility to visit him/her and discovered that he/she had been admitted to the hospital the previous day. A nursing note of 8/19/19 at 3:00 PM states Resident #94's spouse expressed concern over not being notified of the husband/wife's transfer to the hospital and admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for a resident (#301). This was evident for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for pain management. The findings include: Resident #301 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including osteoporosis (brittle bones). On 2/5/19 the geriatic nursing assistant (GNA) #23 documented in the medical record that Resident #301 had pain with walking on 2/4/19 and 2/5/19 and the resident refused to walk in the halls due to pain. The facility obtained an X-ray of the left hip that showed a hip fracture. Resident #301 was transported to the hospital for treatment. The facility determined the fracture was an injury of unknown origin and reported the incident to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) stating staff members were interviewed. The final report to OHCQ stated the cause of the fracture was osteoporsis. The completed facility investigation given to this surveyor did not include any interviews with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to have a system in place to ensure that the transfer of the resident's medical record and appropriate information is communicated to the receiving health care provider. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 5 (#44, #84 and #92) residents reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: The facility staff failed to meet the requirement for transfer information. If the resident is being transferred, and return is expected, the following information must be conveyed to the receiving provider: 1. Resident representative information, including contact information. 2. Advance directive information. 3. The resident's comprehensive care plan goals. 4. Medications (including when last received) 5. Most recent relevant labs, other diagnostic tests. The facility must ensure that the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's medical record and, who is responsible for making the documentation. A medical record review for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident or the resident's responsible party in writing of the facilities bed-hold policy before transferring them to the hospital. This was evident for 3 (Residents #44, #84 and #92) of 5 residents sampled for investigations. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 documented that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 6/6/19, and 6/21/19. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 6/21/19. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (#77 and #101) of 51 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #77 on 9/11/19 revealed Resident #77 was receiving the antipsychotic medication Zyprexa 5mg twice a day for anxiety. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 5/12/19, Section N, failed to capture Resident #77 was receiving the antipsychotic medication for 7 days during the review period. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to develop and then provide Resident (#44 and #300) and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission to the facility. This was evident for 2 of 5 resident reviewed for dementia care during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Review of Resident #44's medical record on 8/13/19 revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission and a copy was provided to the resident/resident representative. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan and provide the resident/resident representative with a copy within 48 hours of admission to the facility. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer a medication to Resident (#53) in accordance with the standard of practice. This was evident for 1 of 51 residents reviewed of medication administration during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed on 10/18/18 the physician ordered: Breo Ellipta Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 100-25 MCG/INH (Fluticasone Furoate-Vilanterol)--1 Inhalation every day. Breo Ellipta 100/25 is a prescription medicine used long term to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or both, for better breathing and fewer flare-ups. Breo is not used to relieve sudden breathing problems and won't replace a rescue inhaler. Breo can cause serious side effects, including fungal infection in the mouth or throat (thrush). Rinse the mouth with water without swallowing after using Breo to help reduce the chance of getting thrush (fungal infection of the mouth): https://www.mybreo.com > copd > about-breo >…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide grooming and personal hygiene services for Residents (#57 and #16). This is evident for 2 of 51 residents selected for review for ADL care reviewed during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. The MDS 3.0 captures information about the residents' comorbidities, physical, psychological and psychosocial functioning in addition to any treatments (e.g., hospice care, oxygen therapy, chemotherapy, dialysis) or therapies (e.g., physical, occupational, speech, restorative nursing) received. 1. The facility staff failed to provide grooming and personal hygiene services for Resident #57. Observation of Resident #57 on 9/10/19 at 9:45 AM and 9/11/19 at 12:45 PM revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain abdominal girths as ordered for Resident (#35), failed to obtain a cardiology consultation as ordered for Resident (#53), failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for Resident (#57) and failed to ensure Resident (#56) was deemed capable to sign consents. This was evident for 4 of 51 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to obtain abdominal girths as ordered for Resident #35. Medical record review for Resident #35 revealed on 9/25/18 the physician ordered: abdominal girth every month on the 28th. Abdominal girth is the measurement of the distance around the abdomen at a specific point. Measurement is most often made at the level of the belly button. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to obtain the abdominal girth as ordered by the physician. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 9/18/19 at 1:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to obtain abdominal girths as ordered for Resident #35.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an environment free from potential accidents for Resident (#53). This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for accident review and 1 of 51 residents selected for review during the annual survey process and observations noted by surveyors. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to remove straws from Resident #53. Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed on 3/31/18 the physician in collaboration with the dietician and Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) revealed: no straws. Surveyor observation of Resident #53 on 9/11/19 at 12:30 PM and 9/12/19 at 7:53 AM, 12:00 PM and 12:35 PM and AM and 9/13/19 at 11:00 AM revealed the resident with a water pitcher in the room; however, there was a straw in the water. The Director of Nursing was made aware of the same. (Of note, the facility staff assessed the resident to be alert, oriented and cognitively intact and has refused the facility staff to remove straws; however, the facility staff failed to address the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to follow a Physician's order for Resident (#1) for tracheotomy care in accordance with the standard of practice. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of tracheotomy care during the annual survey process. The findings include: Surveyor observation of Resident #1 on 9/10/19 at 10:00 AM revealed the resident lying in his/her bed with a tracheostomy tube connected to oxygen. A tracheotomy, or tracheostomy, is a surgical procedure which consists of making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea. Review of the medical record revealed Physician orders written on 6/30/19 to change trach ties daily on day shift for hygiene. Trach ties are the bands that go around the neck. They hold the trach tube in place. The Physician orders written on 6/30/19 also included for the inner cannula to be change/clean every shift for hygiene. The inner cannula fits inside the outer cannula. It has a lock to keep it from being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the clinical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to document the administered of pain medication, assess the need for pain medication and thoroughly monitor the effectiveness. This was true for 2 (#92 and #35) out of the 8 residents reviewed for pain management during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign regarding healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than subjective. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation the facility staff assess pain prior to and after the administration of pain medication to determine the need of the medication and the effectiveness of the medication. 1. The facility staff failed to document the administered of pain medication, assess the need for pain medication and thoroughly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a physician visited a resident (#101) the required number of times during their admission and the physician failed to ensure 2 certifications of inability to make medical decision were provided for Resident (#93). This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the annual survey and 1 out of 10 residents selected for review of advance directives and 2 out of 51 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. Findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure a physician visited a resident (#101) the required number of times during their admission Physicians are required to see a resident once every 30 days for the first 90 days of admission and then once every 60 days thereafter. Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and signed out against medical advice on 6/15/19 after a 9-day stay. Resident #101's physician saw him/her on 3/12/19 and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to complete an ordered consult (Resident #94) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. The findings include: Resident #94 was admitted to the facility for dementia care and on 7/15/19 the physician ordered a psychiatric consult for hallucinations. A copy of the consultation was not a part of the medical record when reviewed on 9/16/19. On 9/17/19 at 9:55 AM the Director of Nursing confirmed the physician order for a psychiatric consult had not been requested by the nursing staff.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that a resident's physician failed to take steps to address irregularities in the resident's drug regimen. This was evident for 1 (Resident #77) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #77's medical record was conducted on 9/12/19. Resident #77's medical record listed 6 pharmacy reviews. 5 out of 6 pharmacy reviews noted irregularities to Resident #77's medication regimen. These irregularities were noted by the facility pharmacist on the following days: 6/19/19, 5/15/19, and 4/17/19. Further review of Resident #77's medical record failed to reveal these pharmacy irregularities were located in Resident #77's medical record and had been been addressed by Resident #77's physician. On 4/17/19 and again on 5/15/19, the facility pharmacist made a recommendation that Resident #77's physician please evaluate the administration of Resident #77 receiving the antipsychotic medication, Olanzapine, for anxiety. On 6/19/19, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication by failing to ensure that a psychotropic medication had an adequate indication for use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #77) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during an annual recertification. The findings include: A review of Resident #77's monthly pharmacy review for April 2019 revealed a recommendation or request for an indication for the continued use of the psychotropic medication Zyprexa. Resident #77 was receiving Zyprexa twice daily for anxiety. The pharmacist requested a reevaluation of Resident #77's antipsychotic therapy and documentation for the continued use. Resident #77 was seen by the facility psychiatric consultants on 8/8/19 when Resident #77's administration of Zyprexa was addressed. In an interview with the facility psychiatric nurse practitioner on 9/13/19 at 9:46 AM, the psychiatric nurse practitioner stated s/he first was asked to assess Resident #77 in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that a resident's physician failed to take steps to address irregularities in the resident's drug regimen (Resident #77) and the facility staff failed to clearly identify target symptoms for the administration of psychotropic medications and establish a plan for the ongoing monitoring of those symptoms for Resident (#93) and the facility staff failed to document the administered of as needed psychotropic medications for Resident (#44) and thoroughly monitor the effectiveness. This was evident for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. A resident's physician failed to take steps to address irregularities in the resident's drug regimen. Review of Resident #77's medical record was conducted on 9/12/19. Resident #77's medical record listed 6 pharmacy reviews. 5 out of 6 pharmacy reviews noted irregularities to Resident #77's medication regimen. These irregularities were noted by the facility pharmacist on the following days: 6/19/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, it was determined the facility staff failed to properly store medications. This was observed twice during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) An observation was made on 09/11/19 at 9:12 AM on the B wing at the nursing station. The surveyor observed an unattended and unlocked medication cart. The medication cart held medications for the resident's residing on the B wing. No nursing staff members were attending the medication cart at the time of the observation. The charge was immediately made aware of finding. Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medications were thoroughly labeled with residents' name and dated when the medication was open. This was evident for 2 of 3 medication carts observed during the annual survey process. The findings include: Observation of the medication cart on 9/17/19 9:11 AM revealed the following observation: 1. The medication cart A on Top Unit had the following: insulin medications with no open dates, 2 Humalog vial, Novolog pen, Humalog pen and two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain a diagnostic test as ordered for Resident (#57) in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 of 51 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Deep vein thrombosis, or DVT, is a blood clot that forms in a vein deep in the body. Most deep vein clots occur in the lower leg or thigh. Some warning signs of a DVT are pain, swelling and warmth. Flowing blood changes the sound waves by the Doppler effect. The ultrasound machine can detect these changes and determine whether blood within a vein is flowing normally. Absence of blood flow confirms the diagnosis of DVT. Medical record for Resident #57 revealed on 5/17/2019 Nurses Note revealed: New order received for an ultrasound (doppler study) right lower extremities to R/O DVT /RT (rule out deep vein thrombosis right leg) due to complaint of pain and swelling. This nurse called to Mobilex to place the order and they did not accept the order as further clarification is needed (Arterial or venous). Left a voice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-18 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1. document an Occupational Therapy screen, and 2. initiate nursing restorative care and plan. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) of 51 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #4 on 9/11/19 at 3:50 PM, Resident #4 complained that s/he was recently discharged from the hospital and has not received any therapy services since being readmitted . Review of Resident #4's medical record on 9/11/19 failed to reveal any therapy notes that indicated Resident #4 had been receiving therapy since being readmitted back to the facility on 9/3/19. In a telephone interview with the facility occupational therapist on 9/13/19 at 1:55 PM, the facility occupational therapist stated that s/he recalled assessing Resident #4 on the day after Resident #4 was readmitted back to the facility on 9/3/19. The facility occupational therapist stated Resident #4 wanted to work on his/her upper body strength and the plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee health records and staff interview the facility staff failed to thoroughly screen for Tuberculosis and failed to have 2nd step Tuberculosis (PPD) completed to those newly hired employees (Employee #22, #23 and #24). The findings include: Bacteria are the cause of Tuberculosis that affects the lungs. Tuberculosis is spread from person to person through the air. When people with Tuberculosis cough, sneeze or spit, they propel the germs into the air. 1. Review of the health record for Employee #22 with the date of hire of 5/7/18 revealed that facility staff failed to thoroughly, screen for Tuberculosis. 2. Review of the health record for Employee #23 with the date of hire of 2/28/19 was screened for Tuberculosis on 9/5/19 as step one of a 2-step screening. No action was taken by the facility staff to ensure immunity by screening to prevent possible exposure to residents and employ 3. Review of the health record for Employee #24. with the date of hire of 6/18/19 was screened for Tuberculosis on 9/6/19 as step one of a 2-step screening. No action was taken by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-09-18 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1. to post the Daily Staffing Schedule in a prominent place and readily accessible to visitors and residents, and 2. retain copies of the posted staffing on the Daily Staffing Schedule. This was evident for all residents in the facility. The findings included: During an observation of the nursing units 9/10/19 and 9/11/19 the surveyor was unable to locate a posted staffing schedule that was in a prominent place and readily accessible to visitors and residents. In an interview with the facility administrator on 9/12/19 at 2:37 PM, the facility administrator stated that a former scheduler posted the federal staffing requirements on a piece of paper every day. The facility administrator stated the former scheduler has been gone for 4 weeks. The facility administrator also stated that the staff have been inadvertently throwing the daily staffing records away.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$95,610 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $95,610 — penalty dated 2024-08-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$658K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 6%Other / private 11%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $658K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$393per resident / day
operating cost
$11,942per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$359per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215111. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next