Montgomery Village Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 625 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 232 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 76% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly identify, verify, and document a legally authorized resident representative to exercise the rights of a resident who lacks capacity. This deficient practice was evident for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #71) of 2 residents reviewed for rights exercised by representative during the annual survey. The findings include: The BIMS score, short for Brief Interview for Mental Status, comes from a quick test that looks at how well you think, learn and remember. Scores range from 0 to 15. Lower scores can point to difficulties with memory or thinking (cognitive) skills. BIMS score: 13 to 15: Normal thinking and memory (no or very little impairment) 8 to 12: Moderate problems with thinking and memory 0 to 7: Severe problems with thinking and memory 1.) On 06/02/2026 at 11:56 AM, a review of Resident #8's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. At the time of admission, the residents BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure consent for psychotropic medications was obtained and maintained in accordance with resident decision-making capacity. This deficient practice was evident for 4 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #3, Resident#8) of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication consent during the annual survey.The findings include:Psychotropic medication is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior.1.) On 06/03/2025 at 7:45 AM, a review of Resident #4's medical record revealed that on 11/30/2022, and 12/05/2022, two physicians certified the resident lacked decision-making capacity due to dementia and delirium. Further review of the record showed the facility identified the resident's family member as the substitute decision maker. However, the records failed to show documented evidence that the resident's family accepted or agreed to serve in the role of a surrogate decision maker. Records also showed that on 07/23/2025, the resident's family member consented to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to properly manage care choices for residents in the absence of an advance directive. This deficient practice was evident for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #4) of 7 residents reviewed for Advance Directives during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.) On 06/02/2026 at 8:24 AM, a review of Resident #16's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with multiple medical diagnoses including dementia. At the time of admission, the resident was screened for Advance Directive (AD). Records revealed that an AD form was reviewed with the resident, and a copy was provided; however, the resident declined to formulate an AD. Further review of the medical records revealed that on 04/05/2025, two physicians certified that the resident lacked the capacity to make healthcare decisions due to dementia. The records failed to show documented evidence that the facility made attempts to establish a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment of resident's care area was kept safe and sanitary. This was evidenced by the paper towel dispenser missing the front cover, which exposed paper towels in the bathroom. This was evident for 2 (Resident #9 and Resident #14) of 160 residents observed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 06/01/2026 at 11:10 AM, during the initial observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] for Resident #9 and #14's bathroom, the front cover of the paper towel dispenser was missing, exposing brown paper towels. The dispenser was located next to the mirror on the wall between the toilet and the sink. On 06/01/2026 at 1:25 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed that the paper towel dispenser was missing the front cover in Resident's #9 and #14's bathroom and that this was a concern. The DON verbalized understanding. On 06/02/2026 at 9:15 AM, during the second observation of the bathroom for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed for a resident receiving hemodialysis. This was evident in 1 (Resident #15) of 8 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy during the recertification survey. The findings include: In the long-term care (LTC) setting, MDS stands for Minimum Data Set. It is a federally mandated, standardized clinical assessment tool used in Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing homes to evaluate every resident's functional, cognitive, and health status. On 6/2/2026 at 12:24 PM, the surveyor interviewed Staff #24 regarding Resident #15's MDS 5 Day assessment dated [DATE]. Staff #24 stated that s/he did not code hemodialysis in Section O of the MDS assessment because there was no documentation in the progress notes indicating the resident had attended hemodialysis. Staff #24 stated there was no other way to determine this information. On 6/3/2026 at 7:30 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure residents responsible party were provided care plan meeting invitations and failed to conduct quarterly care plan meetings within the required timeframe. This deficient practice was evident for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for care plans during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.) On 06/01/2026 at 12:33 PM, during an interview, Resident #2, stated they were unsure how often care plan meetings were conducted. The resident further stated they were not certain whether care plan meetings occurred at least every three months. A review of Resident #2's medical records on 06/02/2026 at 9:07 AM revealed the resident's family member was identified as the legal guardian. Further review of the records indicated that care plan meeting invitations were provided to the resident rather than the resident's guardian. The records also revealed a care plan meeting was scheduled in October 2024, and the following care plan meeting was scheduled in March 2026 which exceeded…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when administering intermittent intravenous (IV) antibiotic infusions. This was evident for 1 (Resident #53) out of 1 resident observed for IV therapy. The findings include: On 6/1/2026 at 9:49 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #53's IV tubing. The IV tubing was not dated or labeled. On 6/3/2026 at 12:28 PM, the surveyor again observed Resident #53's IV tubing. The IV tubing was not dated or labeled. In addition, the end of the IV tubing was not capped and was connected to the lower port. On 6/3/2026 at 12:31 PM, the surveyor interviewed RN #6 regarding IV tubing practices. Registered Nurse, RN #6 stated that IV tubing should be changed every day and that the end of the IV tubing should be capped when not in use. On 6/3/2026 at 12:41 PM, the surveyor conducted an additional review of Resident #53's medical record. The record revealed an order for an IV antibiotic to be administered every 12 hours. However, there was no physician's order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' Electronic Health Records (EHR) accurately reflected their cognitive status. This was evident for 2 out of (Resident #11 and #93) out of 7 residents reviewed for advanced directives during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/01/2026 at 12:18 PM, the surveyor performed a record review. Resident #11's EHR stated that the resident was his/her responsible party. Resident #11 had a medical diagnosis of dementia, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, and a physicians' certification of incapacity to make an informed decision. Resident #11's discharge summary note from 05/19/26 stated that he/she is alert, oriented, verbalized understanding of all discharge instructions provided and will sign all necessary discharge paperwork prior to discharge. On 06/01/2026 at 12:35 PM, the surveyor performed a record review. Resident #93's EHR stated that the resident was his/her responsible party. Resident #93 had a medical diagnosis of dementia, a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in a manner that minimized the potential spread of infection as evidenced by 1) oxygen tubing was on the floor, 2) foley catheter bag was on the floor, and 3) the laundry area. This was evident for 2 (Resident #1, #17) of 160 residents and the laundry area observed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1.) On 06/01/2026 at 8:57 AM, Resident #1's oxygen tubing was observed wrapped around the oxygen concentrator with the nasal cannula, the part of the tubing that goes in Resident #1's nose, was observed on the floor. On 06/01/2026 at 8:59 AM, Staff #8, Registered Nurse (RN) was shown Resident #1's oxygen tubing was on the floor. Staff #8 verbalized that the oxygen tubing being on the floor was an issue and put on gloves, discarded the tubing and went to get new oxygen tubing for Resident #1. 2.) On 06/01/2026 at 8:14 AM, Resident #17's foley catheter was observed on the floor. On 6/01/2026 at 9:10 AM, Resident #17's foley catheter was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were kept within reach for residents to utilize. This was found to be evident for 8 (Residents #3, #23, #45, #49, #53, #73, #99, and #105) of 44 residents observed on the 4th floor of the facility during the recertification survey. The findings include: During observations of the 4th floor of the facility during the morning on 4/3/2025, the surveyor observed call bells on the floor and not within reach of Residents #3, #23, #49, #53, #73, #99, and #105. Further observations by surveyor on 4/4/2025 revealed the call bell on the floor for Resident #45 and call bells on the floor and not accessible for Residents #3, #49, and #73. On 4/7/2025 at 3:30 PM, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #15 was interviewed by the surveyor and stated that it is the facility's expectation that call bells are within reach of residents and that facility staff will check when entering and exiting resident rooms that call bells are accessible. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $8.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 36% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD