Western Md Hospital Center
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, Hagerstown, MD 21742 · Government - State · 63 certified beds · (301) 745-4200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $24,060 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-04)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.2% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 22.2% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 35.8% | 16.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 5.9% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.6% | 25.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.8% | 13.8% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 46.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.66 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 3.32 to 2.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and facility investigation documentation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #40) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. This failure resulted in a determination on 5/31/24 at 9:45 AM of an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #40. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. The date of correction was 5/24/24. The findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with a history of stroke and dependence on mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure. The resident had severe cognitive impairment and was non-verbal. On 5/20/24 the resident was observed resting in bed but did not respond to surveyor's greeting. Tubing connecting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1.) to have a process in place to ensure that the resident's wishes for resuscitation were communicated to staff so that the staff would know immediately what action to take during an emergency. This resulted in harm to Resident #96, who had a do not resuscitate (DNR) order, receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The resident was resuscitated, remained at the hospital for 8 days, and returned to the facility with a chest tube inserted in each lung; 2.) reveal evidence that the resident was informed of their right to formulate an advanced directives by failing to document discussions regarding advanced directives and the outcome of the discussion in the resident's medical record and failed to ensure Do Not Resuscitate orders were followed. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives, and 1 (Resident #96) out of 1 resident reviewed for choices during a survey. The findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-02 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified food service director. This was found to be evident for the one food service director and has the potential to affect all residents. On 11/20/25 the Food Service Director (FSD #13) confirmed that he is not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The FSD reported he has taken the class and is eligible to take the exam but was not yet scheduled for the test. On 11/21/25 at 12:51 PM the FSD reported the facility has a dietitian (#11) who they consult and contact for guidance. On 11/21/25 at 12:51 PM interview with the dietitian revealed she works at the facility 20 hours per week conducting primarily clinical work such as nutritional assessments. The dietitian reported she does answer kitchen questions as needed but confirmed she is not involved in the day-to-day running of the kitchen. On 11/21/25 at 2:50 PM surveyor reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator the concern regarding the failure to have a qualified food service director. As of time of survey exit on 12/2/25 at 1:50 PM no documentation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff identified when the automatic dishwasher was in need of maintenance and repair, and failed to ensure containers used for food preparation and service were stored in a sanitary manner. This was found to be evident during 3 out of 3 observations made in the kitchen during the survey and has the potential to affect all residents.The findings include: 1.On 11/19/25 at 8:45 AM surveyor started the initial tour of the kitchen. Dietary Clerk (#14) informed the surveyor that the Food Service Director was not working today and indicated she would get a supervisor. During this tour the surveyor observed the automatic dishwasher was running and the final rinse temperature was ranging between 192-200 degrees F. The Food Service Supervisor (FSS #12) arrived during this observation and reported the staff have no control over the temperature of the dishwashing machine. The surveyor then observed the final rinse temperature was 205 and this reading was confirmed by FSS #12.On 11/19/25 at 12:45 PM surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident personal funds accounts were held in an interest-bearing account. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #51) of 4 residents who had personal funds accounts held by the facility.The findings include:During the initial screening resident interviews on 11/19/25, one resident (Resident #35) indicated that he/she had a personal funds account at the facility. When asked if he/she received periodic statements, the resident stated he/she was unsure. This triggered an investigation of the facility task for Personal Funds.As part of the Personal Funds task investigation, on 11/24/2025 at 12:10 PM, the facility was asked to provide a list of all residents who had personal funds accounts. On 11/24/2025 at 1:06 PM two lists were provided by the Fiscal Accounts Technician (Staff #8). One list had 12 resident names listed in one column and the other column titled BANK had the notation PNC for each resident. The other list had 4 resident names listed in one column and in the column titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Resident #5 was admitted into the facility in mid-2025. Diagnosis includes but is not limited to schizoaffective disorder.Schizoaffective disorder is a mental health condition that combines symptoms of both schizophrenia, like hallucinations and delusions, and a mood disorder, such as bipolar disorder or depression. Symptoms include psychotic features and significant mood shifts that are intense enough to cause distress or interfere with daily life. Treatment typically involves a combination of medication and counseling to manage these complex symptoms. A review of Resident #5's medical record on 11/20/25 at 1:28 PM, revealed that s/he was taking an antipsychotic medication routinely and on a as needed (PRN) basis. The PRN antipsychotic medication order had a start date of 11/14/25. However, the order did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure injuries receive appropriate services for treatment and prevention. This was evident for 1 (Resident #7) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. The findings include: Resident #7 was admitted into the facility in late 2020 with diagnosis that include unstageable pressure ulcers of the left and right buttocks, Alzheimer's disease, and type 2 Diabetes melllitus. A review of the resident's medical record on 11/19/25 at 1:28 PM indicated that the resident currently had pressure ulcers.On 11/19/25 at 3:45 PM, an observation was made of Resident #7 being transferred by 2 staff using a mechanical lift, from a wheelchair to the resident's bed. The resident's bed was equipped with an air mattress with its controls located at the foot of the bed. The air mattress control indicated that it was set to alternating and on max weight setting of 400 lbs.A subsequent review of Resident #7's medical record on 11/20/25 at 11 AM revealed that his/her most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility ownership failed to ensure identified issues with the roof were repaired. This was found to be evident on one of the three nursing units observed.The findings includeOn 11/19/25 at approximately 11:15 AM surveyor observed on the 2 East hallway, across from room H E232, that one of the ceiling tiles was askew with a gap running the length of the tile. A clear plastic tube about 1.5 inches in diameter was extended from the ceiling down to a large (approximately 3 feet tall) metal can with a green liner and a sign that read: THIS CAN IS NOT FOR TRASH !!!. The can was sitting on a white bath towel.A resident was assigned to the H E232 room at the time of the survey.On 11/19/25 at 2:06 PM the Maintenance Director (#1) reported that there was a roof leak on 2 East and when it leaks water drips and that whole section of floor gets wet. In regard to the tubing and the can, he reported about a year or so ago they established this system so the water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) On 5/20/24 at 8:49 AM, an initial tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted by two surveyors. An observation of the kitchen's walk-in freezer noted a metal container with pureed turkey covered with saran wrap dated 10/17/23-1/17/23. The facility's food service administrator (Staff #53), was present during the tour and stated that the expiration date should have been 1/17/24. Continued observation noted semi-mac and cheese in a metal bin covered with aluminum foil dated 12/12/23-2/12/24 and semi-turkey in a metal bin covered with aluminum foil dated 1/16/24-2/16/24. Staff #53 stated they were all expired and took them to discard. Further observation of the facility's walk-in refrigerator on 5/20/24 at 8:55 AM showed the following: a metal bin covered with saran wrap, labeled Tropical fruit for dinner expires 5/17/24, a plastic bin with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to include staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. This deficient practice has the ability to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: On 6/4/24 at 12:34 PM, a review of the facility assessment had identified about 23 to 34% of the facility's resident population sampled over the last year had behavioral health needs. However, in reviewing the list of annual competencies that the facility had identified and recommended to provide to their staff, behavioral health training was not part of the list. On the same day at 3:15 PM, a sample of employee files were reviewed for competencies and revealed no evidence for behavioral health training. Later at 3:50 PM, the Director of Quality (Staff #11) who was part of the staff listed as involved in the completion of the facility assessment, was interviewed. The concern was discussed with Staff #11 that the competencies listed in the facility assessment did not cover the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-04 · tag F0843 — widespreadHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on pertinent documentation review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a current written transfer agreement with a local hospital. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: On 6/4/24, review of facility assessment failed to reveal a written agreement with a local hospital that is willing to accept residents transported from the facility. On 6/04/24 at 2:00 PM, during an interview with the Director of Quality, she reported that she could not provide a written transfer agreement between the facility and a local hospital. She reported that the facility had routinely transferred the residents to the local hospital without incident. No additional documentation was provided prior to the end of survey.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-04 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespreadRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #16) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Resident #16 had been a resident of the facility since 2016. During an interview with the resident, s/he reported weakness on the left arm and would use the bed rails for position and mobility. An observation of the resident's bed rails during the interview revealed that they were loose as the resident would pull or push on them demonstrating his/her use of the bed rails. On 5/29/24 at 1:41 PM, the Unit Nurse Manager (UM Staff #3) was interviewed about bed rails and reported that there are several assessments that pertain to bed rails. Some of the assessments can be found in the electronic health record while some are in the hard charts. On 5/29/24 at 2:01 PM, Resident #16's medical records were reviewed and revealed consent and side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives and timeframe to meet the resident's medical needs. This was evident for 4 (Resident #6, #34, #9 and #24) out of of 24 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1) On 5/21/24 at 3:15 PM, a review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident resided in the facility for long term care since February 2020 and had multiple diagnosis which included a seizure disorder. Review of Resident #6's most recent quarterly assessment, with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans after each assessment. This was evident for 2 (Resident #13 and #6) of 24 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1) Review of Resident #13's medical record, on 5/20/24, revealed the resident had resided at the facility for several years, was alert and oriented and able to verbally communicate. Resident #13 was currently receiving treatment for a UTI with intravenous antibiotics. On 05/20/24 at 02:16 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #13. She/He explained that she/he gets recurring UTIs, one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-04 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on pertinent document review, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to establish a quality assurance committee which would include an Infection Preventionists at every committee meeting. The findings include: On 5/31/2024 at 1:15 PM, The Administrator provided the attendance sign in sheet for the facility QAPI committee meetings May 2023 through May 2024. Review of the attendance sign in sheets failed to reveal that the infection Preventionists attended the QAPI meetings for 6 consecutive months: The months that did not have a infections preventionist attend were as follows. 4/17/24, 3/20/24, 2/21/24, 1/17/24, 12/20/23, 11/15/23. On 6/04/24 at 12:02 PM, the Director of Quality was interviewed. During the interview she confirmed that the infection preventionists failed to attend the above-mentioned committee meetings. She reported that in 2023 the Infection preventionist was not required to attend every QAPI meeting, however beginning in January 2024 the Infection preventionists were required to attend every meeting.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident or the resident's responsible party with written notice of a room change, including the reason for the change before the resident's room was changed. This was evident for 2 (Resident #31 and #9) out of 4 residents reviewed for choices during the survey. The findings include: 1) A record review on 5/20/24 at 11:00 AM revealed that Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including Dementia. Continued review showed an Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] that documented that Resident #31 had severe cognitive impairment with short- and long-term memory loss. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A subsequent record review revealed that Resident #31 had a room change on 4/18/24. However, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure areas in need of repair were identified and work orders were implemented. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 2 nursing units observed. The findings include: On 5/20/24 at 1:59 PM surveyor observed water stains on the ceiling above the foot of one of the residents' bed in room K on unit 1 East. On 5/20/24 at 2:34 PM surveyor observed a wall protector below the hand rail across from room E on unit 1 [NAME] was noted to be cracked. On 5/31/24 at 2:15 PM the Maintenance Director (Staff #55) reported that if problems are reported they can put in an e work order which is a program to request repairs. And if there is damage the nurse usually calls and puts an order in. He went on to report they do room checks every week and a walk thru every morning. On 5/31/24 a tour of the facility was conducted with the Maintenance Director between 2:27 - 2:42 PM. The areas identified on 5/20/24 of the cracked wall protector in the 1 [NAME] hallway and of the ceiling in room K on 1 East were still present.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Office of Health Care Quality in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #31) out of 6 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A record review on 5/21/24 at 11:29 AM revealed that Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including Dementia. Continued review showed an MDS assessment dated [DATE] that documented that Resident #31 had severe cognitive impairment. Further review on the same day of a facility-reported incident related to Resident #31 with MD00202413 was conducted. The review showed that an allegation of abuse was reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 2/7/24 at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on pertinent documentation review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documentation that a thorough investigation of potential abuse was completed. This was evident for 3 (Resident #98, #15, and #9) out of 6 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 5/22/24, review of facility report revealed that Resident # 98, a long-term resident of the facility, reported an allegation that he/she received abuse from a facility staff member. On 5/29/24 at 9:37 AM, review of social service progress notes dated 7/27/22, revealed that Resident #98 reported to social worker that he/she had received maltreatment by staff. Further review revealed that the resident was unable to provide any further identifying information and that the allegation was reported to nursing staff and administrator who was the abuse coordinator. The facility reported this allegation to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). On 5/22/24 at 12: 30 PM, the Administrator provided a 1-page document of the facility's findings in their investigations of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to communicate the residents comprehensive care plan goals to the receiving healthcare institution to ensure safe and effective transition of care. This was evident for 2 (Resident #24, and #19) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: 1) Resident #24 had been residing in the facility since 2020. On 5/21/24 at 10:46 AM, a review of the resident's medical record at this time indicated that the resident had been sent to the hospital 2 times in 2024. On 5/23/24 at 10:13 AM, a Registered Nurse (RN Staff #20) was interviewed about her process when a resident has an order to be transferred to the hospital. Staff #20 reported her process including the notifications and documentation she would prepare to facilitate the resident transfer. Staff #20 then proceeded to provide the surveyor with a sample of all the documents she would print out for Resident #24 if s/he was to be sent out to the hospital at that time. A review of the documents provided failed to reveal care plan goals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify residents in writing of a transfer, along with the reason for transfer, and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer/discharges of residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #19 and #24) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 5/20/24 at 1:32 PM, a review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the resident had a change in condition on 3/26/24, was transferred to the hospital was readmitted several days later. Continued review of Resident #19's medical record failed to reveal documentation to indicate the resident received written notification of the transfer. On 5/23/24 at 11:00 AM, during an interview, Staff #6, Licensed Social Worker (SW), stated that when a resident was capable, nursing verbally informed the resident when s/he was being transferred to the hospital and verbally notified the resident's representative/family. The SW (Staff #6) stated that when a resident was sent to the hospital and remained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, records review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident unable to carry out activities of daily living the necessary services to maintain good oral hygiene. This was evident in 1 (Resident #11) out of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding. The findings include: Resident #11 had been residing in the facility since 2016. On 5/20/24 at 2:22 PM, the resident was observed in bed with white secretions in the mouth and surveyor noted concerns regarding oral care. On 5/21/24 at 9:29 AM, Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 3/16/24 was reviewed and indicated that the resident was severely impaired with cognitive skills and was dependent on staff for self-care including oral hygiene. Minimum Data Set- The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. On 5/22/24 at 7:56 AM, a review of Resident #11 orders revealed that oral care was to be provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on pertinent document review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician orders for 15-minute safety checks. This was evident for 1 (Resident #98) out of 1 resident reviewed for behavioral or emotional care during the survey. The findings include: On [DATE] review of medical record revealed that Resident #98 was a long-term resident of the facility with a history of depression and previous suicide attempts, while a resident at the facility. On [DATE] at 12:16 PM, review of a progress note dated [DATE], revealed nursing staff discovered Resident #98 in his/her room with a cord wrapped around his/her neck and the resident refused to surrender the cord when the nursing staff attempted to remove it. Further review revealed the resident was transferred to a local hospital for psychiatric evaluation. On [DATE] at 9:29 AM, review of physician's orders with a start date of [DATE], revealed an order, Every 15 minutes checks for safety document in three ring binder in Nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and promote healing of existing pressure ulcers/injuries. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: Pressure ulcers, also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer, is any lesion or injury caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue and staged according the their severity from Stage 1 (area of persistent redness), Stage 2 (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage 3 (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage 4 (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed). On 5/21/24 at 11:04 AM, a review of the facility's Matrix (used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record and other pertinent documentation review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure geriatric nursing assistants were competent to provide care to a resident dependent on mechanical ventilation. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #40) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with a history of stroke and dependence on mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure. The resident had severe cognitive impairment and was non-verbal. Review of the facility investigation documentation for MD00205708 revealed that on 5/14/24, in response to a ventilator alarm sounding, Respiratory Therapist (Staff #46) entered the resident's room and observed two agency GNAs (Staff #49 and #50) transferring the resident to a chair using a hoyer lift. The tubing used to provide mechanical ventilation to the resident was not attached at this time. The Respiratory Therapist re-connected the tubing to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that irregularities identified by the pharmacist were reviewed by the attending physician, and that the attending physician documented in the medical record that the review has been completed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it; and failed to develop policies and procedures that included time frames for the physicians to complete this review. This was evident for 2 (Resident #6 and #9) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The findings include: 1) On 5/24/24 at 9:00 AM, a review of Resident #6's electronic health record (EHR) reveal Medication Management - Medication Regimen Review (MM-MRR) notes that documented the pharmacist's results of the MRR and the pharmacist's recommendations for identified irregularities. 1a) On 9/14/23, in a MM-MRR note, the pharmacist wrote that on 8/18 and 9/11, under chronic pain syndrome, the physician documented that Resident #6 was on Oxycodone (narcotic) and Gabapentin (treats nerve pain) for pain. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident received medication according to an attending physician's orders. This was evident for 1 (Resident #32) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Medical record review on 5/28/24 at 11:52 AM found that Resident #32 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure). Further review on 5/31/24 at 10:30 AM showed an attending provider's order dated 12/20/22 for an antihypertensive medication to be administered twice daily to Resident #32. The order had parameters to hold (not to give) the medication for an SBP less than 100 mmHg (millimeters of mercury) and an apical pulse less than 55. Blood pressure (BP) is often written as an upper and lower number. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is the upper number. It measures the pressure in the arteries during heart muscle contraction. A pulse is the heart rate. It's the number of times the heart beats in one minute. The apical pulse is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medication by failing to adequately monitor a resident for behavior, side effects, or adverse consequences related to a resident's use of psychotropic medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 5/21/24 at 3:15 PM, a review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the documentation that the resident resided in the facility for long term care since February 2020 and had diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (manic depression) (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Review of Resident #6's May 2023 Electronic Medication Administration Summary (eMAR) revealed a 9/27/22 order for Mirtazapine (Remeron, an antidepressant) Tablet by mouth one time per day for bipolar disorder that was documented as given every day as ordered from 5/1/24 to 5/21/24. Continued review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and pertinent document review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medical devices and medications according to the manufacturer's guidelines to ensure their safe and effective use. This was evident for 2 out of 2 nursing units during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 5/29/24 at 1:15 PM, an observation was made of medication cart #1 with Nurse Supervisor Staff #13. Observation of the medication cart drawer revealed a box of approximately 20 safety lancets (a device that is used to measure blood glucose). The lancets were not in their original box and Staff #13 reported she could not report the expiration date of the devices. On 5/29/24 at 1:20 PM, during a brief interview with Staff #13, she reported that all the medication carts are designed for the safety lancets being placed in the cart and not in their original box with an expiration date. On 5/29/24 at 2:14 PM, an observation was made of the East Wing medication storage room with Nurse Supervisor Staff #13. Observation revealed a wall cabinet. Further review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an order was in place for a resident requiring and requesting dental services and failed to develop a care plan to address this issue as well. This was evident for 1 (Resident #9) of 2 Residents reviewed for dental. The findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record on 5/20/24 revealed the resident had resided at the facility for several years, was alert and oriented and able to verbally communicate. Resident #9 is dependent on staff for transfers out of bed and mobility due to weakness. An interview with Resident #9 on 05/20/24 at 03:02 PM revealed that she/he has been experiencing frequent tooth pain. Review of medical record revealed that on 12/26/2023 the Nurse Practitioner (Staff #22) completed a progress note that included the resident reporting tooth pain. Staff #22 assessed the finding and prescribed Anbesol gel for the pain to be given as the resident needs. Anbesol gel is an oral topical gel used for temporary mouth discomfort. Review of the minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for its residents. This was evident for 3(Resident #6, #21, and #96) of 24 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1a) On 5/20/24 at 11:24 AM Resident #6 was observed to have his/her hands in a cupped position indicating possible contractures (fixed resistance to passive stretch of a muscle). There was no splint or device in place in either of the resident's hands and soft palm protectors were observed on the resident's bedside table. On 5/21/24 at 3:15 PM, a review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the resident resided in the facility for long term care since February 2020 and had multiple diagnosis, including traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and contractures of muscle of his/her right lower leg, left lower leg, right upper arm and left upper arm. Resident #6's quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/13/23 documented Resident #6 had a functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) in both upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to 1) conduct a root cause and analysis on the deficiencies cited during the recertification survey which resulted in reciting the same deficiencies and 2) ensure that they were in compliance by their alleged compliance date. This was evident throughout the revisit. The finding include: 1a. During the revisit survey it was determined that the facility was not sending the transfer notice to the resident's representative [F623]. An interview with the Social Work Supervisor Staff #7 on 9/12/24 at 1:30 PM, confirmed that if a resident had capacity the transfer notice was not being sent to the resident representative as required. They failed to ensure that the regulatory requirement was implemented. 1b. During the revisit it was determined that the facility was not incompliance with providing quality of care to the residents [F684] as staff continued to fail to follow physicians' orders. During a medication pass observation on 9/10/24 at 8:15 AM it was determined that the nurse failed to give a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespreadDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, it was determined the facility failed to perform appropriate revisions to the care plan goals and interventions as resident care needs became apparent or changed over time. This was evident for 1 (#17) of 2 residents reviewed urinary tract infection/catheter, 2 (#15, #5) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 (#12) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Resident #17's medical record was reviewed on 5/22/19. The record revealed numerous Care Plan Progress Notes and Evaluations. Many indicated that the resident's goal was evaluated and continued to be appropriate. Resident #17 was reviewed for risk for infection related to suprapubic catheter. The goal was written as, Resident will remain free from infection. The resident was noted to have been sent out to an acute care hospital at least three times in the past quarter for urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop care plans that were person-centered and had measurable goals. This was evident for 5 (#31, #17, #15, #5, #10), of 15 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of Resident #31's medical record on 5/20/19 at 1:54 PM revealed that all goals for care plan problems were written as self-centered to the resident. A care plan problem indicated that Resident #31 was at risk related to a language barrier. The goal was not person/resident centered as it indicated that Resident #31 will have all needs met by staff. 2) Resident #17's medical record was reviewed on 5/22/19. Review of Resident #17's care plans revealed that some of the care plan goals were not resident centered. The resident was dependent on staff for total activities of daily living (ADL) care and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-24 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document what preparation and orientation was given to a resident to ensure an orderly transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (#17, #11) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) On 5/22/19 at 10:57 AM, review of Resident #17's medical record revealed documentation that Resident #17 was sent to an acute care facility on 2/13/19. The progress note, written by a nurse on 2/13/19 timed for 2:09 AM, revealed that the resident had complained of chest pain, with complaints of generalized pain and that the resident was shivering. The note revealed that Resident #17 was sent to the ER (emergency room). There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident had been prepared and oriented to the transfer. Documentation regarding Resident #17 for 3/31/19 at 6:31 PM revealed that Resident #17 was admitted to an acute care facility without any documentation related to preparation and orientation of the resident prior to being transferred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-02 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis. This deficient practice was evident for 7 of the 8 days of the recertification survey.The findings include: The facility lobby was observed on 11/19/25 at approximately 8:30 AM. During the observation, it was noted that a whiteboard was in the central area of the lobby that indicated the facility name, current date, and census of each unit of the facility. However, there was no indication of the staffing information.The assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was interviewed about the federal regulation about posting the nurse staffing information, on 12/1/25 at 3:11 PM. The ADON referred to the whiteboard located in the facility's lobby and reported that they used to post on that whiteboard the complete schedule, including staff names. He indicated that they stopped posting the staffing information since it became a safety concern, as a resident's family member started looking up staff names in social media platforms.The ADON also reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-05-24 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 3 (#21, #11, #17 ) of 3 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #21 on 5/20/19 revealed documentation that the resident was sent to an acute care facility on 2/20/19 for acute renal failure. There was no written documentation found in the medical record that the resident and/or resident representative was notified of the transfer in writing. Interview of Resident #21's responsible party, on 5/20/19 at 11:47 AM, revealed that he/she did not receive written notification. Interview of Staff #2 on 5/21/19 at 11:20 AM and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility did not give notice to the family. The DON stated, we will send a copy of the bed hold with an alert resident and we verbally inform the family but we do not do written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$24,060 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
- $16,042 — penalty dated 2024-06-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROY-STEVENSON, NEDINA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 07/15/2021 |
| EDMONDS, KELLY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/22/2019 |
| WATTS, WAYNE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 12/05/2022 |
| DEVILBISS, KELLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 06/22/2018 |
| COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND CENTRAL PAYROLL BUREAU | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/1966 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215110. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.