Citizens Care Center
415 South Market Street, Havre de Grace, MD 21078 · Non profit - Other · 184 certified beds · (410) 939-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.1% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.0% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.1% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 5.9% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.4% | 13.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.2% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.5% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.63 | 1.33 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 38.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 137 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.7%CMS range 48.2–60.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.9–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 38.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 27.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.3%CMS range 3.9–9.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 184 beds and averages 124.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 60 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to code the resident's status accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This was evident for 7 (#3, #4, #6, #123, #12, #34, #50) of 13 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a comprehensive, federally mandated assessment tool used to evaluate a resident's functional, cognitive, and health status to create individualized care plans, monitor quality of care, and support reimbursement for Medicare and Medicaid certified facilities. 1) On 01/21/2026 at 3:07 PM, a review of Resident #3's physician order dated 12/14/2025 for siderails: 2 1/4 padded bed rails for seizure precautions. On 01/22/2026 at 8:05 AM, a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 5-day assessment for Resident #3, completed on 12/16/2025 and locked on 12/29/2025, revealed a discrepancy. Specifically, Section P0100, titled Restraints and Alarms, had a designated section for Bed rail with options: 0. Not used, 1. Used less…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and interviews with the facility staff it was determined the facility failed to properly assess a resident for bedrails as evidenced by: not assessing a resident for entrapment risk, reviewing risks and benefits with the resident/representative, or obtaining informed consent prior to installation. This was evident for 5 Residents (# 34, # 50, #3, #4, and #6) of 5 residents observed having siderails in use during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:Bed rails are adjustable bars attached to beds. While they can aid mobility and safety, they can also act as a restraint, preventing exit, and pose an entrapment risk if incorrectly installed. Proper evaluation of resident needs is essential before installation to maximize benefit and prevent risk. A side rail is a specific type of bed rail mounted on the sides. Entrapment occurs when a resident is caught or entangled in or around the bed rail, potentially causing injury, impairment, or death. 1) On 1/20/2026 at 11:01 AM, during the screening process of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a restraint-free environment as evidenced by ensuring least restrictive measures were attempted prior to utilizing restraints. This was identified for 2 (Resident #4 and #6) of 2 residents reviewed for restraints during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:1) On 01/20/2026 at 10:02 AM, during initial tour and observation, an alarm activated when Resident #4 got out of bed. At 10:07 AM, Resident #4 was observed standing in the doorway, appearing anxious due to the alarm's sound. The resident commented to staff (unknown) at the nearby medication cart, Don't you get tired of that sound, to which the staff member replied, Sometimes. At 10:09 AM, a different staff member came to the door, stating, I am going to turn the alarm off, and Resident #4 responded, Thanks, it is enough to drive you nuts.On 01/22/2026 at 11:15 AM, a review of Resident #4's admission record revealed Resident #4 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan to meet and address the residents' medical and physical needs. This was evident for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #125) of 40 care plans reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey process.Findings Included:A care plan is a tool used to summarize the resident's healthcare needs, treatments, and care goals. This tool is to be developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment (MDS) and prepared by an interdisciplinary team.1) On 01/20/2026 at 09:18 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 receiving oxygen (O2) with no date observed on the O2 tubing to indicate when the O2 tubing was last changed.On 01/21/2026 at 2:30 PM, a review of the physician orders dated 01/17/2026 revealed Supplemental Oxygen 2 Liters via nasal cannula to maintain O2 saturation of 90%.On 01/23/2026 at 2:52 PM, a review of Resident #2's care plan revealed no documented evidence of that respiratory care plan was developed to ensure a resident-specific treatment was a part of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that the residents' care plans were reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team to address the resident's medical and physical needs after a change in health status. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 40 care plans reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey process.Findings Included:A care plan is a tool used to summarize the resident's healthcare needs, treatments, and care goals. This tool is to be developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment (MDS) and prepared by an interdisciplinary team.Restorative Care is a supportive service that usually follows rehabilitation to maintain function and prevent further decline, focusing on incorporating skills into daily life.1) On 01/23/2026 at 1:40 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 wearing a brace on the left upper extremity as she sat in the chair next to the bedside. On 01/28/2026 at 3:54 PM, a review of Resident #2's medical records revealed orders to wear hinged elbow brace,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the resident had the opportunity to participate in an activity program and failed to provide documentation of participation in desired activity. This was found to be evident for 1(Resident # 34) of 5 residents reviewed for activity during the recertification/complaint survey.The Findings include:During the survey investigation process on 01/20/2026 at 12:38 PM, Resident # 34 stated that he/she missed BINGO twice because no one assisted him/her to BINGO.A record review was conducted on 1/22/2026 at 09:53 AM that revealed an Activities- Initial Review for Resident # 34 was conducted on 7/20/2017. Documented in section A. past activity interests were [Resident #34] enjoys fishing, hunting, and card games; section D. limitations/special needs: question 5. Assistance should be provided to get resident to the activity- yes. Question 6. If any of the above are answered yes, please describe the accommodation that should be made to encourage/promote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance to professional standards of practice, as evidenced by failing to: 1) properly manage a bowel regimen that led to persistent constipation, and 2) appropriately assess, evaluate, and modify interventions for a newly developed pressure ulcer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #123) of 8 residents that were reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: According to the Mayo Clinic, constipation is a problem with passing stool. Constipation generally means passing fewer than three stools a week or having a difficult time passing stool.According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), pressure ulcers (bed sores, pressure sores, or decubitus ulcers) are wounds from unrelieved pressure on the skin, per the CDC. They are staged by severity: Stage 1 is persistent skin redness; Stage 2 is partial thickness loss (abrasion, blister, shallow crater); Stage 3 is full thickness loss exposing subcutaneous tissue (deep crater);…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation, review of the medical record, and interview with facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide necessary respiratory care services for residents by failing to change out an empty humidifier bottle, failing to maintain nasal cannula in a sanitary manner, and failing to administer oxygen as prescribed. This was evident for 3 (#138, #125, #3) out of 6 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care during the recertification/complaint survey.The Findings Include:1) On 01/21/2026 at 9:43 AM, a surveyor's observation revealed that Resident #125 had oxygen at bedside. The oxygen tubing was observed laying on top of the oxygen concentrator and not stored in a sanitary environment. It was also observed that the attached humidifier was dated 01/13/2026. At the time of the observation the resident was asked if he/she used oxygen and the resident stated that they used oxygen in the afternoons. On 01/21/2026 at approximately 09:46 AM, in an interview with RN#27, she stated that the resident used 2 liters via nasal cannula oxygen as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident reporting serious pain received a follow up assessment after receiving treatment for the pain to ensure effectiveness of the treatment. This was evident for one (Resident #46) out of three residents reviewed pain during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: A review of a facility reported incident (#2704171) was conducted on 1/20/26. A review of the resident's clinical record on the same day revealed that Resident #46 was ordered Tylenol extra strength 500 mg to be administered in the morning for pain. The resident reported pain on 12/30/25 that was rated as 8 out 10. The resident was administered the medication at approximately 9:00 AM but there was no evidence that staff went back to see if it was effective. The resident's physician added a medication order at 5:00 PM on the same day for Tylenol extra strength 500 mg one tablet every 8 hours for the diagnosis of pain. The resident received their first dose at 6:02 PM and had a pain level of 0…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's blood sugar was properly monitored. This was evident for one (Resident #5) out of five residents reviewed for the unnecessary medication review task during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include: This surveyor reviewed Resident #5's clinical record on 1/23/26. The resident's physician wrote an order on 10/10/25 for the resident to be administered Admelog (insulin) 100 units/ml 3 units to be injected every morning but to be held if blood sugar is below 70. The resident had their blood sugar checked on 1/11/26 at 7:00 AM. The blood sugar was 65 and the medication was held. The clinical record was reviewed and there was no evidence that the physician was notified to ensure adequate monitoring of the resident's blood sugar levels. Failure to notify the physician denied the physician the opportunity to intervene. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 1/23/26 at 3:40 PM. She was shown the Medication Administration Record and informed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services. This was evident for one (Resident #5) out of three residents reviewed for dental services during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: This surveyor interviewed Resident #5 on 1/22/26 at 9:41 AM. This surveyor asked if the resident has seen a dentist in the past 12 months and if the resident was having any mouth pain. The resident stated that they have not been to the dentist or had a dentist come to see them at the facility for over a year. The resident also reported no mouth or tooth pain. This surveyor interviewed the Unit Manager (#26) for Bay Lane unit on 1/22/26 at 12:05 PM. She said they assess residents for pain, discomfort, chewing and/or swallowing issues and will call the dentist when appropriate. She was unaware that the resident needed to go to the dentist since the resident has not been complaining or has stated a need to see a dentist. A review of the clinical record on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the investigation of complaints, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to update residents' (and/or responsible parties') wishes related to life-sustaining treatment and assess residents' capacity to make decisions in a timely manner. This failure was evident for one (Resident #8) of the eight residents whose care was reviewed during this complaint survey.The findings include:A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used for documenting a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatment options for a specific patient.As a portion of the investigation into complaint #361874, the surveyor reviewed Resident #8's medical records on [DATE] at 8:30 AM. The review revealed that the resident was their own Responsible Party (RP) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the investigation of complaints, medical record review, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that changes in residents' condition were notified to the physician in a timely manner. This failure was evident for one (Resident #8) of the eight residents whose care was reviewed during this complaint survey.The findings include: As part of the investigation into complaint #361874, the surveyor reviewed Resident #8's medical records on 11/05/25 at 8:30 AM. The review revealed the following: -Staff #11 (Registered Nurse) documented in a progress note on 5/12/25 at 12:38 PM that Resident #8 was tearful with increased confusion.-Staff #4 (Social Worker) recorded Resident #8's confusion on 5/12/25 at 1:26 PM in a progress note, stating: [Resident's name] was tearful during our exchange. Unable to provide year, month stating 'I'm confused.'However, there was no documentation indicating that Resident #8's change in mental status was notified to the provider.In an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 11/05/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on an investigation of intakes, reviewing medical records, and interviewing facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's Treatment Administration Records (TAR) were correctly documented. This was evident for one (Resident #8) of eight residents reviewed for care during this complaint survey.The findings include:During the investigation of complaint #361874, on 11/05/25 at 8:30 AM, it was noted that Staff #8 ( Licensed Practical Nurse) wrote a progress note on 5/14/25 at 7:14 PM as returned from hospital without boots.Further review of Resident #8's progress notes revealed that multiple staff documentation about the resident's boots, which could not be found. Specifically: A note dated 5/15/25 by Staff #4 wrote, Resident #8 reported that he/she don't know where his/her blue boots were he/she was supposed to wear them. The nurse clarified that there were no boots. A note dated 5/16/25 by Staff #4 wrote, Resident asked for his/her blue boots. Nursing to follow up. A note dated 5/17/25 by Staff #9 (Registered Nurse) wrote that they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: (1) to ensure that a resident followed up with the Urologist for management of the foley catheter; (2) transcribe physician pain scale orders for resident #1. (3) follow a treatment order as ordered by the physician for resident #59. (4) follow physician orders as evidenced by a resident not being properly positioned to receive enteral nutrition, enteral nutrition not being administered during the ordered times, medications were not administered the times ordered, and the ordered amount of oxygen was not delivered for several days. This deficient practice was evident in 5, (Resident #1 # 18, #33, #59, #100) of 38 resident records reviewed during the Survey Findings include: 1. The facility failed to ensure that resident #18 followed up with the Urologist for management of the foley catheter. A medical record review was done on 5/2/24 at 10:00 AM and it revealed resident # 18 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited to diagnosis: Multiple Sclerosis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that water temperatures remained within acceptable range. This was found to be evident during 11 room observations made of the Harbor View Unit and 2 residents (#31,#32) during the facility's survey. Findings include: 1. On 4/30/24 at 10:39 AM the surveyor made observations of water temperatures in resident rooms located on the Harbor View Unit. Bathroom temperatures for the following rooms were observed: Room# 148 had a temperature of 122 degrees Fahrenheit (F) Room # 149 had a temperature of 122 degrees F Observations were made on the same date at 11:05 AM of the water temperatures of the sink located inside the resident rooms as follows: Room # 149 sink temperature was 120 degrees F Room # 150 sink temperature was 120 degrees F After the surveyor identified elevated temperatures on the above unit, the Director Maintenance of (DOM), Staff # 21 was notified and arrived on the unit at 11:30 AM to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to get a resident out of bed for four out of five days and failed to dress the resident in his/her own clothing. This deficient practice was evident in 1(#59) of 2 residents observed for dignity during the survey. The findings include: On 04/29/24 at 1:14 pm The surveyor entered Resident #59's room and observed him/her in bed wearing a soiled hospital gown, and tube feed infusing. On 05/01/24 at 10:35am The surveyor observed Resident #59 in bed wearing a hospital gown, and his/her hair was not combed. On 05/02/24 at 10:35am The surveyor observed Resident #59 in bed wearing a hospital gown, uncombed hair, and the blinds closed. During an interview with Geriatric Nursing Assist (GNA)#30 on 05/02/24 at 1:46 pm, the GNA reported being assigned to Resident #59 the previous day (05/01/24) and the resident prefers to wear a hospital gown while in bed. GNA#30 did not get Resident # 59 out of bed (OOB) on 05/01/24 or 05/02/24. Resident #59 did not get out of bed Monday (4/29/24) and had on a gown because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to issue the bed hold notice. This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident (#109) reviewed for hospitalization during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: Review of the medical record by the surveyor on 5/3/24 at 11:16AM revealed a nursing progress note dated 9/24/21 that Resident #109 was transferred to the hospital on 9/24/21, however, no documentation could be found in the medical record to indicate the facility issued the bed hold notice. On 5/3/24 at 11:32AM the surveyor made a request to the Director of Nursing (DON) for any documentation of the bed hold notice having been provided to Resident #109 and/or their representative. During an interview on 5/3/24 at 12:15PM the DON informed the surveyor that the facility did not have any documentation that the bed hold policy was issued to the resident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the medical record and interviews with the facility staff it was determined the facility failed to follow the resident care plan for the management of a resident with a foley catheter. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 18) of 39 residents reviewed during the facility's survey. Findings include, A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident care. A medical record review was done on 5/2/24 at 10:00 AM and it revealed resident # 18 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited to diagnosis: Multiple Sclerosis (a disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves), and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty). Review of the facility resident matrix indicated the resident currently had an indwelling catheter in place. The Matrix is used to identify pertinent care categories for: 1) newly admitted residents in the last 30 days who are still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the nursing staff failed to meet professional standards of care by not ensuring that medication was consumed prior to leaving the resident room. This was evident for 1 (Resident #89) of 4 residents observed for professional standards. The findings include: On 04/30/24 at 11:39 AM, the surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22 administer medications to Resident #89. LPN #22 placed a dark amber colored liquid in a small cup at the resident's bedside table. The LPN left the room. The cup was untouched, and no directions were given to the resident on what to do with the cup. On 04/30/24 at 11:41 AM, the surveyor interviewed Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #25 and LPN #22. GNA #25 stated that's the protein when asked about what was in the cup on Resident #89's bedside table. When the surveyor asked LPN #22 about what the standard of practice is when administering medications, the LPN confirmed it is the standard of practice to ensure the resident completes the medication before leaving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to demonstrate that annual performance reviews were conducted for geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs)annually based on the employee's hire date. This was determined and evidenced to be true for 4 out of 4 GNAs, (GNA #40, 41,42, and 44) during the review of facility human resource and staff education files while performing the staffing facility task during the survey. The findings include: On 05.06.24 at 1:52 PM the surveyor requested the director of nursing (DON) to provide seven human resources records and seven staff education records. On 05.06.24 at 2:30 PM the surveyor received seven staff education records which included two registered nurses, one LPN and four geriatric nursing assistants. On 05.07.24 at 08:30 AM the surveyor reviewed the staff education records of four certified GNAs. The surveyor was not able to find any evidence of performance evaluations completed for four GNAs (#40,41, 42,44) for the years of 2022 or 2023. During an interview on 05.07.24 at approximately 10:07 AM, with the director of nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to address a pharmacy recommendation in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: The medical abbreviation PRN stands for 'pro re nata,' which means that the administration of medication is not scheduled at prescribed times, but instead, the medication is taken on an as needed basis. On 5/3/24 at 9:48 AM review of the medical record revealed a document titled Letter to Physician from the pharmacist, Staff #37, with a medication regimen review (MRR) dated 3/8/24 that stated: Resident has an order for PRN lorazepam. Please note all PRN psychotropic drugs require a stop date, regardless if resident is hospice. Please specify a stop date of 14 days or, in order to extend a PRN order past 14 days: 1) The prescriber must document their rationale in the medical record (such as end of life) and 2) Indicate the duration for the PRN order (consider 3 or 6 months and then reevaluate). In the section, titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to monitor a resident for side effects who was prescribed psychotropic medication. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#33) of 2 medical records reviewed for side effects of medications during the Survey. The findings include: On 4/29/24 at 9:49 AM the surveyor reviewed Resident #33 medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR) revealed on 08/05/22 at 10 am the resident was ordered Zyprexa 2.5 mg by mouth every am and on 06/05/23 at 9 pm the resident was ordered Zyprexa 7.5 mg by mouth at bedtime. On 5/7/24 at 10:00 AM on further review of Resident #33 MAR/TAR revealed there was no documentation to verify the resident was being monitored for psychotropic medication side effects. On 05/07/24 at 11:21 am during an interview with License Practical Nurse (LPN) #22, the surveyor asked what the process is for monitoring a resident on psychotropic medications for side effects. Nurse #22 reported that if he/she noticed a change in behavior, it will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview of facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication was not left unattended and failed to: (1) ensure a medication cart was locked evident for one medication cart observed : (2) discard expired medications, properly store medical supplies, and check the refrigerator temperatures for biologicals and supplements. This deficient practice was evident in 2 out of 2 medication storage rooms assessed during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 5/6/24 at 12:49PM, the surveyor observed one medication cart on the Bay Lane Unit unattended with the lock mechanism protruding, indicating the cart was unlocked. Upon further observation of the cart, the surveyor observed one labeled Baclofen (muscle relaxant) medication blister packet containing a pill sitting on the work surface of the cart with a pair of scissors next to it. Upon sliding each drawer mechanism, the surveyor was able to open all drawers of the cart which contained various medications and supplies. On 5/6/24 at approximately 1:00PM Staff #36, Registered Nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and observation it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) date and sign inventory sheets for resident personal effects, and 2.) failed to ensure accuracy of a medical order. This was evident for 2 out of 2 resident's inventory sheets (#39, #42) reviewed and 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1.) On 4/30/24 at 10:04AM Resident #39 reported to the surveyor that their bottom dentures had broke in half and they preferred to have them. On 5/3/24 at 11:53AM the surveyor conducted a review of the medical record and observed the inventory sheet in the paper chart which listed personal effects for the resident, however, it did not include any denture(s) listed. Upon further review of the inventory form, there was no signature of anyone confirming the personal effects listed or date on the form to determine when the inventory occurred. On 5/3/24 the surveyor conducted an interview with Staff #30, Geriatric Nursing Assistant, who reported to the surveyor that they were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that four geriatric nursing received and completed a total of 12-hours of clinical training annually. This was determined and evidenced to be true for four out of four GNAs, (GNA #40, 41,42, and 44) human resource and staff education files reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 05.06.24 at 1:52 PM the surveyor requested the director of nursing (DON) to provide seven employee human resources records and seven employee staff education records. These files included 4 geriatric nursing assistants (GNAs), one licensed practical nurse (LPN#39), and two registered nurses (RN #43 and # 45). On 05.06.24 at 2:30 PM the surveyor received seven staff education records which included two registered nurses, one LPN and four geriatric nursing assistants. The DON was unable to provide written documentation that the four GNAs completed a total of twelve hours of clinical education training annually during 2022 and 2023. On 05.07.24 at 2:30 PM the surveyor interviewed staff #9, staff educator who stated that she that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for Resident (#4) to reflect accurate and current interventions. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for care plans during the survey process and 1 of 49 residents reviewed during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment of the resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, reviews of a medical record and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order and apply had splints to a resident daily, to take steps to address skin discolorations on a resident's legs, to address and notify the physician of results of an abnormal blood sugar level. This was evident for 3 (Resident #3, #52, and #77) of 49 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) During an observation of Resident #3 on 04/29/19 at 1:21 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #3 to have bilateral hand contractures and there were no splints applied to Resident #3's hands at that time. A review of Resident #3's medical record revealed a physician order, dated 04/16/19, instructing the nursing staff to apply bilateral palm protectors to Resident #3's hands from 9 AM to 9 PM. The 04/16/19 physician order also instructed the nursing staff to remove Resident #3's for washing, to keep Resident #3's hands clean and dry, as well as perform daily stretching. A review of Resident #3's April 2019 treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-02 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on reviews of administrative records and staff interview, it was determined that the nursing administrative staff failed to 1) conduct a yearly performance review on the entire nursing assistant staff for the year of 2018, and 2) ensure that all geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) staff completed a minimum of 12 hours of education per year. The findings include: 1) In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/02/19 at 10:27 AM, the facility DON stated that none of the geriatric nursing assistant staff received a performance evaluation for 2018. 2) On 05/02/19, a review of 5 random (GNA) staff members, educational records for 2018, revealed that 5/5 GNA's (staff member #9, #10, #11, #12, and #13) failed to complete at a minimum of 12 hours of education for the year of 2018.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dining observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Residents (#6 and #103) with the most dignified existence with dining. This was evident for 2 of 9 residents observed for dining in the first-floor dining room. The findings include: Surveyor observation of lunch in the first-floor dining room on 4/30/19 revealed residents #29 and #59 at a table eating lunch at 12:20 PM. Further observation revealed the facility staff brought Residents #6 and #103 into the dining room and sat them at the same table with Residents #29 and #59 who was currently eating. Residents #6 and #103 were alert and observing Residents #29 and #59 eating to the point of Resident #103 questioning the other resident about eating and did they have their food yet. Further observation revealed the facility staff failed to provide lunch to Residents #103 and #6 until 12:40 PM, 20 minutes after initial placement at a table with Resident #29 and #59 eating. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/1/19 at 1:30 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide showers to Resident (#4). This was evident for 1 of 49 reviewed for choices during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #4 revealed the resident was to have showers on Tuesday and Friday day shift. Interview with the resident on 4/29/19 at 10:19 AM revealed the resident stating he/she is always the last resident to be showered, after 12:00 PM and Resident #4 wanted showers to be early. Further record review revealed the facility staff documented showers for Resident on: 4/2/19 at 2:20 PM, 4/16/19 at 3:39 PM, 4/19/19 at 2:32 PM and 4/30/19 at 2:19 PM. Further record review revealed the facility staff failed to provide a shower to Resident #4 on 4/5/19, 4/9/19, 4/12/19, 4/16/19, 4/23/19 and 4/26/19 and there is no evidence of the resident refusing shower on those days. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/1/19 at 10:00 AM revealed the resident does like showers early and in talking with the resident will change shower times to night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure an advance directive was in place for Resident (#33). This was evident for 1 of 6 residents selected for review of advance directives and 1 of 49 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. The (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) MOLST is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatments or do-not-resuscitate order (DNR). DNR order, is a medical order written by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide thorough grooming and personal hygiene services for (Resident #75). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents selected for review for ADL care and 1 of 49 reviewed during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. The MDS 3.0 captures information about the residents' comorbidities, physical, psychological and psychosocial functioning in addition to any treatments (e.g., hospice care, oxygen therapy, chemotherapy, dialysis) or therapies (e.g., physical, occupational, speech, restorative nursing) received. Surveyor observation of Resident #75 on 5/1/19 at 1:30 PM revealed the resident's finger nails on left hand, ring finger of left hand extremely long and jagged, it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Resident (#75) was being turned and repositioned as ordered. This was true for 1 out of 49 residents selected to be reviewed for pressure ulcers. A nursing care plan is a formal process that includes correctly identifying existing needs, as well as recognizing potential needs or risks. Care plans also provide a means of communication among nurses, their patients, and other healthcare providers to achieve health care outcomes. Without the nursing care planning process, quality and consistency in patient care would be lost. Pressure ulcers are injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin. Pressure ulcers most often develop on skin that covers bony areas of the body, such as the heels, ankles, hips and tailbone. One preventative measure to in the development of pressure ulcers is: change positions frequently. When you change positions often, there will be less pressure on your skin, reducing your risk of developing pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide Resident (#53) with the physician ordered nutritional services and failed to document the amount of supplement consumed. This was evident of 1 of 4 residents selected for review of nutrition during the annual survey process and 1 of 49 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #53 with the physician ordered nutritional services. Medical record review for Resident #53 revealed on 9/12/18 the physician ordered: resident to have distant supervision for all meals. resident to go to dining room for lunch on days that are provided, in day room on unit for all other meals. resident to have 2-3 items in front of her/him instead of whole tray to help reduce distraction. Surveyor observation of Resident #53's breakfast on 4/30/19 at 8:40 AM revealed Resident #53 eating breakfast in the room and the facility staff failed to provide the resident with 2-3 items in front of him/her. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct AIMs testing on Residents (#74). This was evident for 1 of 49 resident selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) is a rating scale that was designed in the 1970's to measure involuntary movements known as tardive dyskinesia (TD). TD is a disorder that sometimes develops as a side effect of long-term treatment with neuroleptic (antipsychotic) medications. Tardive dyskinesia is a syndrome characterized by abnormal involuntary movements of the patient's face, mouth, trunk, or limbs, which affects 20%-30% of patients who have been treated for months or years with neuroleptic medications. Persons taking any kind of antipsychotic medication need to be monitored for movement disorders. The AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) aids in the early detection of tardive dyskinesia as well as providing a method for on-going surveillance. 1. The facility staff failed to conduct an AIMS on Resident #74. Medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to take steps to obtain dental services for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #112) of 3 residents reviewed for dental services during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: In an interview with Resident #112 on 04/29/19 at 11:14 AM, Resident #112 stated that s/he had not seen a dentist since being admitted to the facility. A review of Resident #112 medical record failed to reveal any documentation Resident #112 was offered the opportunity to be seen by the facility dentist. A review of Resident #112's resident fund account on 05/02/19 revealed Resident #112 had monies that could be used for a dental consultation. In an interview with staff member #14 on 05/02/19 at 9:19 AM, staff member #14 stated that s/he could not locate any documentation about Resident #112 receiving dental services, but s/he would continue to look. Review of Resident #112 annual MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of medication pass, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications without using bare hand contact. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents observed for medication observation and 2 out of 37 opportunities. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #14 revealed on 7/1/14 the physician ordered: Lyrica 75 milligrams by mouth and on 10/13/17 ordered Zantac 150 mgs by mouth every morning for reflux-acid indigestion. Lyrica is used to treat pain caused by nerve damage due to diabetes, shingles (herpes zoster) infection, or spinal cord injury. Zantac is used to treat ulcers of the stomach and intestines and prevent them from coming back after they have healed. This medication is also used to treat certain stomach and throat (esophagus) problems such as gastroesophageal reflux disease-GERD- acid indigestion. It works by decreasing the amount of acid the stomach makes. Observation of medication pass on 5/1/19 at 8:40 AM revealed the facility staff nurse #8 dropped the Lyrica and the Zantac on top of the medication cart. At that time,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| QUIMBY, CINDY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 06/08/2022 |
| BADEKER, PATRICIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/23/2020 |
| BAXTER, WENDELL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/31/2012 |
| BEULAH, CURTIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/03/2015 |
| CORRERI, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/03/2015 |
| JORDAN, JOYCE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/31/1999 |
| ROBERTS, ANNA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/31/2013 |
| WELCH, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/31/2016 |
| ZAVROTNY, KIMBERLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/27/2020 |
| PANOS, PETER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/23/1976 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215039. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.