Sacred Heart Home INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 43.3 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.10 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.07 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 9% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food items were labeled and dated. This was found to be evident during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey and has the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared in the facility's kitchen.The findings include:On 07/24/2025 at 7:41 AM, during the initial tour of the main kitchen of the facility with the Dietary Manager Staff #2 accompanying the surveyor, inside the stand-alone refrigerator were unlabeled and undated sausages and fried eggs in separate bowls. Staff #2 confirmed that they were eggs used for puree and that the sausages were left over but the staff who had made the food forgot to date and label it. Staff #2 took the food items out of the refrigerator.On 07/24/2025 at 7:48 AM, during a continued tour of the kitchen. Inside the walk-in freezer, the following items were observed, there was a bag of frozen sausages, two bags of chicken drumsticks, one bag of chicken…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on documentation review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure nurse aide competency training (including dementia management and resident abuse prevention training) occurred no less than 12 hours per year. This was evident for 3 of 3 employee training records reviewed and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: A review was conducted of GNAs' (Geriatric Nurse Aide) training records from 2019 to current on 12/09/22 at 8:00 AM. A review of GNA #35's personnel file revealed GNA #35 was hired in November 2006. A review of GNA #36's personnel file revealed GNA #36 was hired in July 2004. A review of GNA #37's personnel file revealed GNA #37 was hired in March 2010. During an interview with Staff #2 (Minimum Data Set Coordinator, Infection Control Preventionist, also an educator) on 12/09/22 at 08:54 AM, she stated the facility did not document staff's education records in their employee files. Staff #2 confirmed that instead of filing under the personal file, the facility saved in-service sign-in sheets for all staff's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based upon observations, record review, and facility staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) have a system in place to ensure the appropriate use and implementation of side rails and bed rails, 2) have accurate assessments that correlate with the physician orders and 3) have consents that correlate with the actual need of the use for side rails. This was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards (#8, #14, #34). The findings include: 1. During tour of the third floor, Resident #8 was observed on 11/30/22 at 10:26 AM and 12/01/22 09:41 AM with the bed positioned at a 45-degree angle with bilateral (both) upper half length bed rails with bilateral padding that failed to extend to the upper ¼ of the bed rails, leaving this portion of the rails exposed with no protective padding. On 11/30/22 10:53 AM, this resident was observed leaning to the right side with his/her call bell on the floor under the bed. Medical record review of Resident #8 on 12/12/22 at 10:05 AM revealed diagnoses including: dementia, history of other mental and behavioral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) keep complete kitchen records and, 2) store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and safety. This was evident of 3 out of 4 observations of food storage during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 11/30/22 at 10:33 AM, the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (staff #32). The surveyor observed Kitchen Staff #12 passing dishes through the dishwasher. When asked about the process for verifying temperature and sanitizer levels for the dishwasher, Staff #12 was able to demonstrate how to take the temperature on the dishwasher and able to demonstrate application of a testing strip to monitor the chlorine levels. Staff #12 then stated the temperatures and chlorine levels are logged before each dishwasher run and whomever is working in this area is responsible for recording the readings. The surveyor reviewed the dishwasher logbook and noted November written on the top of the first log page.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-14 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview of facility staff, observations, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a process for conducting regular inspection of bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment. This was evident for 3/3 residents (Resident #8, Resident #14, Resident #34) reviewed for bed rails. This has the potential to affect all residents who utilize bedrails. Regular maintenance checks and inspection of bed rails are necessary to ensure the highest degree of safety for both residents and the facility staff who assist them. Bed rails can shift and loosen over time, and possible areas of entrapment must be identified to prevent potential injury and harm to residents. The findings include: Interview with the Maintenance Director, Staff#16, on 12/07/22 at 11:05 AM revealed that the facility looks at rooms every turn-over when a resident expires. However, regular routine maintenance documentation of inspection of bedrails does not exist unless there is a problem/work order placed for it. When asked for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to meet and address a medical need. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents observed for visual aids (Resident #8). The findings include: A person-centered comprehensive care plan addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is a valuable tool which must reflect immediate steps utilized to direct the approach to support the patient to achieve and maintain their highest practicable level of functioning and well-being. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 on 12/01/22 at 10:36 AM revealed the patient requires a visual aid per the 1/14/22 annual MDS under section 'B1000' for vision, noted that s/he had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on random observations it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards. This was evident during 3 random observations of the second floor. The findings include: 1. During a tour of the third floor on 12/1/22 at 9:39 AM, Surveyor observed an unattended and unlocked medication cart open in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Surveyor stood and monitored the medication cart for 5 minutes until Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14 approached and asked if she could provide the surveyors with any assistance. The surveyor brought the unlocked medication cart to her attention and she confirmed that the cart was unlocked and stated that the nurse assigned to the cart was currently down the hall. 2. During a tour of the third floor on 12/6/22 at 9:45 AM until 9:49 AM, Surveyor observed an unlocked and unattended medication cart located outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. At 9:49 AM LPN #20 exited room [ROOM NUMBER] that was on isolation. LPN #20 was asked if this was her medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident's medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide rehabilitative services according to residents' comprehensive care plans for residents on isolation for COVID-19. This was evident of 2 out of 2 residents reviewed rehabilitation services (Resident #21 & Resident #25). The findings include: On 12/2/22 at 12:04 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident 21's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #21 had diagnoses that included: age-related osteoporosis, osteoarthritis of both knees, difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. Further review of the record revealed an order written on 11/22/22 for Resident #21 stating, Physical Therapy (PT) recertification orders; continued skilled physical therapy 1-3 weeks for 30 days. On 12/5/22 at 12:27 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #25's medical record. The review revealed Resident #25 had diagnoses that included: unequal limb length, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain consistent and accurate medical records. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident # 38) and 2 of 3 residents reviewed with skin conditions (Resident #3 and Resident #39). The findings include: 1. Resident #38 was observed and reviewed secondary to his/her random selection into the initial pool process for the annual survey. Resident #38 was first observed on 11/30/22 at 10:09 AM sitting in bed and was able to answer a few questions. S/he did state that s/he had not had any falls recently and has not been to the hospital. A review of Resident #38's medical record on 11/30/22 at 11:59 AM revealed that a Fall Risk Assessment was completed on 10/23/22. Under #1 for history of falls, during the last 90 days, the resident has had how many falls; '0' was selected for no falls although 8/26/22 was entered in the auto populated space under #1 as the date of the most recent fall. Further review of the 2-page assessment compared to the fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to promote and enhance a resident's dignity and rights by obtaining weights on Resident (#22). This was evident for 1 of 28 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #22 revealed on 4/19/18 the physician ordered: no weight monitoring. Further record review revealed the facility staff obtained and documented weights on the resident on: 4/25/18 and 5/6/18. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/25/19 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to honor the wishes of Resident #22 by obtaining weights when there was an order for no weights.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MD