No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Egle Nursing Home

57 Jackson Street, Lonaconing, MD 21539 · For profit - Corporation · 66 certified beds · (301) 463-5451 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 463-5451 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605, F0610) — most recent Oct 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
90 Main St · (301) 359-5145 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
22 Main St Ste A · (301) 359-3778 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
15915 Lower Georges Creek Rd SW · (301) 463-2432 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2 Union St · (301) 777-7200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased48.7%20.4%15.4%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.6%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.1%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained5.6%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened43.6%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.0%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.7%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.9%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.1%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.9%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.5%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.211.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.571.201.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.0%CMS range 29.0–50.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 6.9–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.0–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.491.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
0.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.10
RN hoursweekends
35.9%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 64.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-09)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-09 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents or resident representatives with written notice of transfer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #66) of 2 residents reviewed for hospital transfers.The findings include:On 10/06/25 at 4:10 PM, the Surveyor conducted a closed record review for Resident #66 related to a hospital transfer. A progress note dated 9/24/25 documented that staff heard a loud thump and found the resident (#66) on the bathroom floor. It was determined that the resident had fallen and was transferred to the hospital following an assessment. There was no documentation indicating that a written transfer notice or summary had been provided to the resident or the resident's representative.On 10/07/25 at 8:39 AM, the Surveyor conducted a second review of the resident's medical record and was unable to locate any evidence that transfer information had been provided to the resident or resident representative.During an interview on 10/07/25 at 8:59 AM, the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON) whether written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify Lap Buddy as a physical restraint, assess the resident for its use, and provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation for its continued use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #26) or 1 resident reviewed for physical restraints. The findings include:A lap buddy is a cushion placed in a resident's wheelchair between the armrest and in front of the resident. A lap buddy is considered a physical restraint when it is attached to a wheelchair, preventing a resident from moving freely in the chair or getting up, and it cannot be easily removed. An observation on 10/1/2025 at 11:13 AM, noted Resident #26 sitting in a wheelchair by his/her bedside, with a lap buddy in front of him/her. The resident was attempting to remove it but was unable to do so. Another observation of Resident #26 later that day showed that s/he remained in the same position, sitting in the wheelchair with the lap buddy in front of him/her. The observation failed to show opportunities for repositioning or release of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication use by failing to adequately monitor a resident for behaviors, side effects, or adverse consequences related to antianxiety medication use. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:A review on 10/3/2025 at 11:46 AM of Resident #8's Medication administration record (MAR) and Treatment administration record (TAR) from August to October 7, 2025, showed that Resident #8 had received antianxiety medication daily for anxiety.Continued review of Resident #8's plan of care included interventions for psychotropic drug use that stated, Monitor and record drug use effectiveness, side effects, and adverse consequences and Monitor for behaviors per protocol. Quantitatively and objectively document behaviors.However, the review lacked evidence that the facility staff monitored Resident #8 for changes in behaviors that necessitated the use of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) out of 1 facility-reported event (#361395) reviewed for abuse.The findings include:Resident #69 has Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and muscle wasting and weakness.On 10/02/25 at 1:43 PM, the Surveyor reviewed the facility-reported investigation (FRI #361395) which revealed that on 8/31/24 the resident was discovered sitting in their wheelchair with their right leg in an unnatural position. The resident was examined, and a fracture was suspected. Due to the resident's inability to vocalize what had occurred, this was deemed an injury of unknown origin. The resident was transferred to the hospital, and later that night the hospital confirmed a right hip fracture requiring surgical intervention.Further review of the facility's documentation revealed that the facility interviewed all staff members involved in the resident's care. Staff reported that the resident had remained in their room all day due to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents within the regulatory time frames to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain current and accurate assessment records. This was evident for 2 (#8, #61) of 34 residents reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. The last day of this observation period is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). This is the end date of the observation period and provides a common reference point for all team members participating in the assessment. The admission MDS assessment is a comprehensive assessment for new residents and, under some circumstances, returning residents. It must be completed by the end of day 14, considering the date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident within the regulatory time frames to facilitate appropriate care planning and maintain the current assessment record. This was evident for one (Resident #61) reviewed during the recertification survey.The findings include:The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool that nursing home staff use to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The information collected drives resident care planning decisions. The Quarterly assessment must be completed within 92 days of the MDS Completion Date of the last OBRA assessment. It must also be completed no later than 14 days after the ARD, which is the date of the ARD plus 14 days. The last day of the observation period is the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). This date provides a common reference point for all team members participating in the assessment. A review of Resident #61's record showed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately recorded. This was evident for one (Resident #2), who was reviewed for Resident Assessments during the survey.The findings include:The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the Resident that provides the facility information necessary to develop a care plan, provide the appropriate care and services to the Resident, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need.A review of Resident #2's medical record included an MDS assessment dated [DATE]. The MDS assessment had recorded anticoagulant drug use during the MDS observation period for Resident #2.Continued review of Resident #2's medication administration record (MAR) for August 2025 showed documentation of antiplatelet use during the observation period of Resident #2's MDS assessment dated [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activity programs to meet residents' needs and preferences. This was evident for 1 (#8) of 2 residents reviewed for Activities.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure each resident receives the necessary care.Observation on 10/1/2025 at 2:54 PM showed Resident #8 lying in bed and not involved in any activity.A subsequent observation on 10/2/2025 at 9:55 AM showed Resident #8 lying in bed, not involved in any activity, and calling out, Help me, help me.A record review for Resident #8 on 10/3/2025 at 2:03 PM showed that his/her diagnoses included Dementia and had severe impaired cognitive status.Further review included an MDS assessment dated [DATE] for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure injuries receive appropriate services for treatment and prevention. This was evident for 1 (Resident #43) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries.The findings include:Resident #43 had been a resident of the facility since 2023 with diagnoses that include dementia, muscle wasting, and adult failure to thrive.A review of the facility matrix document provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on 10/1/25 at 3:41 PM. The document indicated that Resident #43 had a pressure injury/ulcer.Resident #43 was observed on 10/6/25 at 10:11 AM. During the observation, the resident was sleeping in bed equipped with an air mattress. The control for the air mattress was located at the foot of the bed and was observed to be set on the max weight setting of 450 lbs.A review of Resident #43's medical record was conducted on 10/6/25 at 10:43 AM. The review revealed no documentation to indicate that the resident's weight had been taken for 2025. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure urine collection bags were secured and off the floor. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter.The Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted into the facility in mid-2025 with diagnosis that includes urinary retention.Urinary retention refers to the inability to completely empty the bladder, resulting in the accumulation of urine in the body. Treatment includes but is not limited to Catheterization.An intermittent (straight) catheter is inserted through the urethra into the bladder to empty it, then removed.An indwelling urinary catheter is inserted in the same way as an intermittent catheter, but the catheter is left in place. The catheter is held in the bladder by a water-filled balloon, which prevents it from falling out. These types of catheters are often referred to as Foley catheters.A Foley catheter is a device that drains urine (pee) from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't pee on your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete the residents' Matrix accurately. This was evident during the recertification survey. The findings include:The Matrix is used to identify pertinent care categories for: 1) newly admitted residents in the last 30 days who are still residing in the facility, and 2) all other residents. The facility completes the resident name, resident room number, and corresponding care categories. All information entered on the form should be verified by a staff member knowledgeable about the resident population. Information must be reflective of all residents as of the day of the survey.After the initial entry to the facility for this survey on 10/1/25, the director of nursing (DON) presented a complete matrix for all the residents to the survey team.A review of the Matrix showed that there was no resident receiving end-of-life care/Comfort Care, /Palliative Care. However, a review of Resident #4's medical record included an attending provider's note dated 9/30/25, stating that Pt [patient] seen. Pt is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident records were accurate. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #12) who had duplicate and contradictory active Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment forms of 2 residents reviewed for advance directives.The findings include:A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used for documenting a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining treatment options for a specific patient.The Maryland MOLST form includes a third page with instructions and states, in part, the MOLST form shall be voided and a new MOLST form prepared when there is a change to any of the orders. If modified, the physician, NP, or PA shall void the old form and complete, sign, and date a new MOLST form. Voiding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required attendees participated in the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings at least quarterly. This was evident in 8 out of 12 sign-in sheets reviewed during the survey.The findings include:A review of the sign-in sheets for the facility's Quality Assurance (QAA) Committee meetings from August 2024 to August 2025 was completed. The review revealed that meetings were held monthly. However, the review failed to show that the Nursing Home Administrator attended the meetings in November 2024, January 2025, April 2025, May 2025, and September 2025. The review also failed to show that the Director of Nursing attended the meetings in March 2025 and April 2025. An interview on 10/9/2025, at 10:51 AM, with staff #20, the current QA Nurse, and staff #6, the former QA nurse, failed to provide documentation confirming that all attendees were present in all meetings. By the time the survey ended, no additional evidence was provided.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to properly store clean linens. This was evident for 2 of 2 soiled laundry areas observed during the recertification survey.The findings include:On 10/02/25 at 9:44 AM an observation of the facility's laundry facilities was conducted with the Director of Housekeeping (Staff #7) and the laundry aide (Staff #8). The first area observed was the laundry room which on one side contained two washing machines (dirty area), and on the other side contained two dryers (clean area). There was no separation between the clean and dirty sides of the room. On the dirty side of the room, directly across from the washing machines was a cart with a pile of folded bed pads. When asked, Staff #7 said that they were clean and were ready to be taken to the nursing units for resident use. Staff #7 confirmed that the washing machine area was the dirty linen area in the room. Staff #8 confirmed that clean linens should not have been stored in the dirty linen area.Staff #7 and Staff #8 then showed the surveyor to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain documentation of screening, education, offering, and current COVID-19 vaccination status. This was evident for 1 (Staff #16) of 2 staff reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations during the infection control task portion of the recertification survey.The findings include: On 10/02/25 during the entrance conference, a list of all employees was requested. Four staff were randomly selected from this list for health record review. Of the selected staff, two (Staff #10 and Staff #16) would have been eligible for the 2024-2025 version of the COVID-19 vaccine. On 10/06/25 at 2:29 PM ,a review of the health records provided by the facility for Registered Nurse (Staff #16) failed to reveal any evidence that she was screened, educated, or offered the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine. On 10/07/25 at 10:38 AM, an interview with the infection preventionist nurse (Staff #5) was conducted. She stated that it was her understanding that the facility did not offer COVID vaccines to employees due to insurance reimbursement.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide full visual privacy to a resident residing in a non-private room. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 resident reviewed for privacy.The findings include:During the initial pool process on 10/1/25 at 10:56 AM, Resident #4's room was inspected. It was observed during the inspection that the room had two occupied beds, and both were equipped with a railing system for overhead privacy curtains. However, the curtain that was used for Resident #4's bed (window side of the room), when fully extended, only covered one side and left the foot side of the bed completely open.On 10/6/25 at 10:16 AM the charge nurse for the unit where Resident #4 resided, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) was interviewed outside the resident's room. LPN #1 was asked how staff maintain privacy when incontinence care is provided to Resident #4. She indicated that she would use the overhead privacy curtain. LPN #1 was asked to demonstrate use of the privacy curtain in Resident #4's room. As LPN #1 pulled the curtain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff were educated on abuse. This was evident for 5 (Director of Nursing [DON] and Staff #10, #11, #12, and #13) out of 5 employee training records reviewed during the Sufficient and Competent Staffing task.The findings include: On 10/02/25 at 10:58 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the facility assessment (dated January 2025), Section 3.3 Staff Training/Education, which states:Employees at our facility require various levels of education, training, and certifications to be employed. Upon hire, the following non-exhaustive protocols are followed, which in part include that staff are, at a minimum, educated on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property; the procedures for reporting incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property; and care and management of persons with dementia and resident abuse prevention. On 10/02/25 at 2:06 PM, the Surveyor interviewed the DON and requested employee training records.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received in-service education that included dementia management and abuse prevention. This was evident for 2 (Staff #12 and #13) out of 5 staff reviewed under the Sufficient and Competent Staffing task.The findings include:Regulatory guidelines require that nurse aides receive a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education annually. These in-services must include training in dementia management and abuse prevention.On 10/02/25 at 10:58 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the facility assessment (dated January 2025), Section 3.3 Staff Training/Education, which states: Employees at our facility require various levels of education, training, and certifications to be employed. Upon hire, the following non-exhaustive protocols are followed, which in part include: Abuse, neglect, and exploitation training that at minimum educates staff on activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff 1) failed to properly store food items in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator, and 2) failed to have a process in place to determine the expiration date of food procured from vendors. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 4/30/24 at 10:35 AM, accompanied by Staff #7, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), an initial tour of the kitchen by two surveyors identified the following concerns: 1) An observation of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator revealed there was an uncovered, large rectangle, shallow pan that appeared to be filled with cooked food product. The uncovered pan was dated 4/30/24 and labeled 'potatoes', and there was an uncovered, large rectangle, shallow pan which appeared to be was filled with food product. The uncovered pan was dated 4/30/24 and labeled 'rice pudding'. At that time of observation, Staff #7 stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans after each assessment. This was evident for 1 (#39) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents, and 1 (#45) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. 1) Bed rails are adjustable bars attached to the bed. As enablers, bedrails assist to facilitate mobility, and/or repositioning in bed. On 4/30/24 at 12:24 PM, an observation of Resident #39 lying in bed revealed bilateral bed rails attached to the resident's bed. At that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that the head of bed (HOB) was properly elevated for a resident during medication administration and infusion of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) feeding. This was evident for 1 (#43) of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding. The findings include: A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube is placed into the stomach through an opening in the stomach wall. If one cannot eat or drink all the nutrients they need, liquids such as formula, fluids, and medicines are put through the PEG tube. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. A review of Resident #43's admission MDS assessment, dated 12/21/20, found that Resident #43 had a PEG feeding tube. A subsequent record review on 4/30/24 at 10:50 AM showed that a care plan, initiated on 12/31/20,had documentation that Resident #43…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with residents, it was determined that the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity as evidenced by failing to knock and request permission before entering a resident's room. This was evident for 1 (#33) of 28 residents included in the resident sample. The findings include: On 5/1/24, at 9:55 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #33. During the interview, the door to the resident's room was closed. At approximately 10:00 AM, Staff #10, Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) entered Resident #33's room without knocking. On 5/2/24 at 4:11 PM, the Director of Nurses (DON) was made aware that the GNA had failed to knock on the resident's door and request permission from the resident prior to entering the resident's room. The DON responded that the Staff #10 had told her about it, and indicated the GNA was thrown off because the door to the resident's room was closed, and the door was usually kept open.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's cognition and mood on a comprehensive MDS assessment. This was evident for 1 (#33) of 1 residents reviewed for care planning. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. The Annual MDS assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed annually (at least every 366 days) unless a significant change in assessment has been completed since the most recent comprehensive assessment was completed. Completion of the comprehensive annual MDS assessment, must be completed no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days following a significant decline in a resident's condition. This was evident for 1 (#8) of 28 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. The nursing home should complete a significant change in status MDS assessment within 14 days when there's a major decline or improvement in a resident's status. A medical record review, completed on 5/7/24 at 1:22 PM, for Resident #8 showed that they were admitted to the facility in June 2019. Further review found a nurse's note, dated 2/13/24, that recorded that Resident was complaining of Left knee hurting. not wanting it touched.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (#64 and #35) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. Active diagnoses documented on the MDS assessment are attending provider-documented diagnoses in the last 60 days that directly relate to the Resident's current functional status, cognitive status, mood or behavior, medical treatments, nursing monitoring, or risk of death during the 7-day look-back period. 1. Medical record review on 5/6/24 at 12:05 PM found that Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a limited range of motion received treatment and services as ordered by the attending provider to prevent further decline in the range of motion. This was evident for 1 (#43) of 3 residents reviewed for position and mobility. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. Palm Protectors offer relief from hand contractures and cramping. They are put over the thumb and around the hand, providing a cushioning pad for the fingers to curl onto. This prevents the nails from digging into the palms and keeps the fingers warm and supported. An observation was made of Resident #43 on 4/30/24 at 10:55 AM, lying in bed, unable to move his/her left hand, and having no device in place. A medical record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that prior to the installation of bed rails, the facility 1) failed to identify and use appropriate alternatives prior to installing or using bed rails, and 2) failed to assess a resident's risk of injury or entrapment prior to installing or using bed rails. This was found to be evident for 1 (#39) of 1 residents reviewed for side rails. The findings include: Bed rails are adjustable bars that attach to the bed and are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes. As enablers, bedrails facilitate movement and may promote independence. Entrapment is an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. On 4/30/24 at 12:24 PM, an observation was made of Resident #39 lying in bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that physician progress notes were written, signed, and dated at each visit. This was evident for 2 (#45, #29) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) On 5/7/24 at 9:59 AM, a review of Resident #45's medical record was conducted. Review of Resident #45's electronic medical record (EMR) and paper medical record revealed that physician's visit notes were not written, signed, and dated at the time of each visit. In Resident #45's EMR, there was a physician's visit progress note, dated 2/3/24 at 7:22 PM, that indicated the day of the physician visit date was 1/22/24, a physician's visit progress note dated 4/7/24 at 2:27 PM, that indicated the date of the physician's visit was 3/25/24, and a physician's visit progress note dated 5/2/24 at 8:58 AM, that indicated the date of the physician's visit was 4/22/24. On 5/7/24 at 4:35 PM, the Director of Nurses (DON) was made aware of the concerns. At that time, the DON acknowledged the concerns and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep complete and accurate medical records as evidenced by 1) failing to transcribe an accurate indication for use of antipsychotic medication, 2) failing to document a resident's wound evaluation in the medical record, and 3) failing to ensure that the a care plan meeting was documented. This was evident for 2 (#45, #35) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 (#45) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1) On 5/7/24 at 9:59 AM, a review of Resident #45's medical record was conducted. Review of Resident #45's May 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a 11/29/23 order for Seroquel (quetiapine) (antipsychotic) 25 mg (milligrams) by mouth, special instructions: dementia with psychosis, specific behaviors; paranoia, argumentative with staff, restless, repetitive calling out, once a day at 8:00 AM, and a 11/29/23 order for Seroquel 50 mg (milligrams) by mouth,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) before giving direct care to a resident with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) feeding tube. This was evident for 1 (#43) of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding. The findings include: A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube is placed into the stomach through an opening in the stomach wall. It is used to give drugs and liquids, including liquid food. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. Enhanced Barrier Precautions are infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of infection in nursing homes. It involves gown and glove use during high-contact Resident care activities like dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, or assisting with toileting for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to conduct a regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment and failed to ensure the equipment was inspected and maintained according to manufacturer's recommendations and requirements and timeframes. This was evident for 1 (#39) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents and had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 4/30/24 at 12:24 PM, an observation was made of Resident #39 lying in bed. At that time bilateral bed rails were observed attached to the resident's bed. On 5/9/24 at 11:14 AM, during an interview, Staff #6, Maintenance Director, stated that all of the resident beds in the facility had bed rails attached to the bed, and when the facility bought new beds, the bed rails were already attached to the beds. When asked if the facility's regular maintenance program ensured the inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, Staff #6 indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide full visual privacy for a resident residing in a non-private room. This was evident for 1 (Resident #268) of 25 residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: Resident #268 was a newly admitted resident of the facility residing in a non-private room with 2 beds. Resident #268 occupied bed B and his/her roommate occupied bed A. On 5/1/24 at 11:58 AM, an inspection of the privacy curtain located between the 2 beds in the room was conducted and revealed that it only extended up to the length of the beds. On 5/3/24 at 8:58 AM, a review of Resident #268's medical records indicated that s/he used a bedside commode in the room for bowel and bladder elimination. A tour of the room was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/3/24 at 9:45 AM. The observation was confirmed and discussed the concern that privacy curtains must extend around the bed to provide total visual privacy in combination with adjacent walls and curtains. The DON reported that the room had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-05-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to keep the walk-in freezer in the kitchen in safe operating condition. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen. The findings include: On 5/13/19 at 11:55 AM, during an initial tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), observation was made of the walk-in freezer. There were small mounds of ice on the ceiling of the freezer covering 1/2 of the ceiling in front of the 2 condenser fans. Surrounding the inside of the freezer doorframe was a build-up of ice/frost. The DM stated that the company that serviced the freezer would be contacted. The Nursing Home Administrator stated during the exit conference that he/she was aware of the problem and thought that a latch would be needed to correct the problem.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-16 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) personnel files and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months for 7 out of 7 personnel files reviewed. The findings include: A review was conducted of GNA personnel files on 5/15/19: 1) Review of Staff #10's employee file documented a date of hire (DOH) of 6/8/16. The last yearly review found in the personnel file was dated 8/5/17. 2) Review of Staff #17's employee file documented a DOH of 11/13/17. There was no yearly evaluation found in the personnel file. 3) Review of Staff #8's employee file documented a DOH of 2/18/16. The last yearly review found in the personnel file was dated 8/11/17. 4) Review of Staff #18's employee file documented a DOH of 4/22/15. The last yearly review found in the personnel file was dated 9/4/17. 5) Review of Staff #19's employee file documented a DOH of 3/20/18. There was no yearly evaluation found in the personnel file. 6) Review of Staff #20's employee file documented a DOH of 3/11/11. The last yearly review found in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to store and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to discard expired food and by touching food with bare hands. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen, during 1 of 2 dining observations observed and during observation of 1 of 2 medication rooms. The findings include: 1) Observation was made on 5/13/19 at 11:55 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Manager (FSM) of (3) 6 lb. bags of brownie mix that were received in the building on 6/19/18 with an expiration date of 4/24/19 and (3) 5 lb. boxes of Buttermilk biscuit mix that had expired as of 5/1/19 that were received in the building on 6/19/18. The FSM confirmed the findings at the time of observation. 2) Observation was made on 5/15/19 at 12:16 PM of Staff #15 setting up the lunch tray for Resident #2. Staff #15 pulled a slice of bread out of the plastic bag with his/her bare hands and proceeded to butter the bread while holding the bread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record and facility documentation review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely notify the physician and dietician of a significant weight gain. This was evident for 1 (#29) of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 on 5/16/19 revealed that, on 3/31/19, the resident had a documented weight of 122.2 lbs. (pounds). On 5/1/19, the documented weight was 130.4 lbs. which was an 8 lb. (6.71%) gain in 1 month. Further review of the medical record revealed that the resident received a high calorie supplement (90 ml) twice per day for nutritional support at 9:00 AM and 8:00 PM in addition to a house supplement (240 ml) three times per day at 10:00 AM, 2:00 PM and 7:00 PM for nutritional support. On 5/16/19 at 9:42 AM, Staff #14 was asked about the process for taking weights. Staff #14 stated that the GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) would take the weight and that either the GNA, nurse or dietary manager would enter it in the system and then tell the charge nurse. Staff #14 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to document what preparation and orientation was given to residents to ensure an orderly transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (#59, #58) of 4 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #59 on 5/15/19 revealed documentation that Resident #59 was sent to an acute care facility on 4/4/19. Review of the progress notes that documented Resident #59's transfer out of the facility on 4/4/19 did not reference an explanation of Resident #59's orientation and understanding of the impending transfer. 2) On 5/14/19 at 9:51 AM, review of Resident #58's medical record revealed that, on 3/30/19, in a progress note, the nurse documented that Resident #58 was sent to the hospital emergency room via ambulance for evaluation of his/her right foot. There was no documentation in the medical record that Resident #58 had received an explanation of the purpose of the transfer to the emergency room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the physician failed to write a discharge summary that summarized a resident's stay and treatment received in the facility. In addition, the facility staff failed to reconcile pre and post discharge medications. This was evident for 1 (#65) of 2 closed records reviewed. The findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record on 5/16/19 revealed documentation that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation following surgery and was discharged from the facility on 3/18/19. There was no physician's discharge summary found in either the paper medical record or the electronic medical record. The discharge summary is a concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility. There was no evidence in the medical record that pre and post discharge medications were reconciled. Medication reconciliation is a process of comparing pre-discharge medications to post-discharge medications for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) apply a physician's ordered splint to the right hand, 2) failed to accurately document the use of the brace and 3) failed to follow the care plan for splinting. This was evident for 1 (#29) resident reviewed for positioning. The findings include: Observation was made of Resident #29 on 5/13/19 at 1:28 PM. A blue splint/brace was sitting in a chair while the resident was in bed. Review of Resident #29's May 2019 physician's orders revealed the order, Rt (right) wrist splint to be on at all times; May remove for hygiene/bathing. Continued observations were made on 5/14/19 at 2:00 PM. The resident was lying in bed and there was nothing on the right hand. The blue hand splint was observed under a chair on the floor, however, a review of Resident #29's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) was signed off by the day shift nurse, as of 2:00 PM, that the hand splint was worn during that shift. At 2:20 PM, a second surveyor observed the resident to confirm the findings. On 5/15/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications as evidenced by failing to ensure that medication properly labeled and dated. This was evident in 1 of 2 medication rooms and 1 of 3 medication carts observed during the survey. The findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 110:30 AM, observation of the refrigerator in the second-floor medication room revealed a Levemir (insulin detemir) Flextouch insulin pen, that was labeled with Resident #40's name and not labeled with the date it was opened. Staff #12 confirmed the finding at that time. 2) On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, observation of a first-floor medication cart revealed a bottle of Lantaprost (Xalatan) 0.005% ophthalmic solution that was labeled with Resident 7's name and an opened date of [DATE], indicating the Lantaprost was expired. Per manufacturer recommendation, once a bottle of Lantaprost is opened, it may be stored for at room temperature for 6 weeks. Staff #7 was made aware of the finding at that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to keep accurate medical records as evidenced by nursing staff signing off that a splint/brace device was worn when it was observed to not be worn. This was evident for 1 resident (#29) reviewed for positioning. The findings include: Observation was made of Resident #29 on 5/13/19 at 1:28 PM. A blue splint/brace was sitting in a chair while the resident was in bed. Review of Resident #29's May 2019 physician's orders revealed the order, Rt (right) wrist splint to be on at all times; May remove for hygiene/bathing. Continued observations were made on 5/14/19 at 2:00 PM. The resident was lying in bed and there was nothing on the right hand. The blue hand splint was observed under a chair on the floor. At 2:20 PM, a second surveyor observed the resident to confirm the findings. On 5/15/19 at 10:33 AM, Resident #29 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room for activities. The blue splint was not on the right hand and the hand was contracted. A contracture is a condition of shortening and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-05-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 2 (#59, #58) of 4 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #59 on 5/15/19 revealed documentation that Resident #59 was sent to an acute care facility on 4/4/19. There was no written documentation found in the medical record to indicate that the resident and/or resident representative was notified of the transfer in writing. An interview was conducted with the charge nurse (staff #11) at 12:03 PM on 5/15/19 as to the facility's procedure for providing the resident and or resident representative a written notification of the facility-initiated transfer. Staff #11 was unaware of the regulation for written notification when sending a resident out of the facility. The social worker (staff #3) was interviewed at 1:00 PM on 5/15/19. The social worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAUDER, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 09/27/2000
LAUDER, GEORGEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 09/27/2000
METZ, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 09/27/2000
RAINES, TROYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 09/27/2000
LAUDER, BARBARAIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/27/2000
SIDHU, HARJITIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/27/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 12%Other / private 88%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$352per resident / day
operating cost
$10,712per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$366per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215307. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next