No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hebrew Home Of Greater Washington

6121 Montrose Road, Rockville, MD 20852 · Non profit - Corporation · 558 certified beds · (301) 770-8310 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 770-8310 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6245 Executive Blvd · (301) 881-3171 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
184 Rollins Ave · (301) 816-2801 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11845 Old Georgetown Rd · (301) 468-3238 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Montrose0.3 mi
5901 Montrose Rd · (301) 770-7838 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6101 Montrose Rd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.2%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.8%22.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.6%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.0%22.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.2%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.4%13.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.7%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.8%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.561.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.421.201.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,271 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 497 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.2%CMS range 63.0–69.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 8.6–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 4.1–6.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.16
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
19.3%
Total nursing turnover
20.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 558 beds and averages 405.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 152 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident had reasonable accommodation of their needs. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #2) out of 8 residents reviewed during this survey.The findings include:On 4/20/2026 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2's call bell hanging on the wall out of reach. The surveyor observed that Resident #2 had restraint mittens on their hands, and the call bell was a push button.The following day, 4/21/2026 at 12:33 PM, Resident #2's call bell was observed hanging on the wall, not within reach of the resident due to immobility. The surveyor asked the unit manager, LPN #8, to come to Resident #2's room with her. LPN #8 was asked where the call bell was. LPN #8 saw the call bell hanging on the wall. LPN #8 stated that the GNA must have left it there after changing them. LPN #8 confirmed that the call bell was hanging on the wall. The surveyor then pointed out that the call bell was a push-button model and asked LPN #8 how Resident #2 was supposed to use it when their hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that facility failed to ensure timely notification of death to a resident's family. This was found to be evident for 1FRI (#2685784) out of 15 FRI's reviewed during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 4/23/2026 at 8:20AM, a review of FRI #2685784 revealed that the family member of Resident #435, who was enrolled in hospice care, expressed the concern that the resident passed away on 11/9/2025 somewhere around 7PM and the facility failed to notify the family/resident representative on 11/9/2025 until nearly 10PM. A review of Resident Change Evaluation (END OF LIFE) document completed on 11/10/2025 revealed that the resident was noted with no pulse, no respiration, no blood pressure, and no temperature at 7:35PM on 11/9/2025, while the family/resident representative notification was not recorded until 10:00PM that evening.During an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) #2 on 4/23/2026 at 8:45AM, the Surveyor expressed the concern regarding their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents. This was found to be evident for 2 (Rooms #2111 and #2141) out of 36 resident rooms observed on 2 East [NAME] -Kogod Unit during the annual recertification survey. Additionally, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' environment was clean and well maintained. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 278 and Resident # 425) of 31 resident rooms observed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey.The findings include: On 4/20/2026 between 9:00AM and 11:00AM, during an initial tour of 2 East [NAME]-Kogod Unit, the Surveyor observed the following environmental concerns: -In room [ROOM NUMBER], structural damage to several boards of the center flooring, including soft spots, gaps between planks, edge chipping, warping, and lifting at the seams.-In room [ROOM NUMBER], a wall vent near the doorway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and facility staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the local Ombudsman was notified of the facility's resident discharges and transfers in a timely manner, at least monthly. This was found to be evident for 2 (#10, #319) out of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 4/22/2026 at 9:07AM, during a review of Resident #10's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered that the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] due to shortness of breath. On 4/22/2026 at 11:25AM, during an interview conducted with (DON) #2, the Surveyor was informed that the local Ombudsman is notified of resident discharges and transfers on a monthly basis. By the 5th of each month, an email is sent by DON #2 to the local Ombudsman notifying them of the discharges and transfers for the previous month. A review of the Resident Response List, generated on 12/4/2025 at 8:59AM for discharges and transfers for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not following the physician's order for applying a hand mitt restraint. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (#2) of 8 residents reviewed for physician orders.Findings include:On 4/20/2026 at 9:53 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 in bed wearing hand mitt restraints on both hands.On 4/21/2026 at 10:35 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #2 wearing only one mitt on the left hand. The surveyor immediately interviewed the Unit Manager, LPN #8, regarding the prior observation. LPN #8 stated that the mitt had been removed from the resident's right hand because the physician's order specified application to the left hand only.On 4/21/2026 at 12:59 PM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #2. Review of the physician's orders confirmed the following directive: Apply hand mitt to left hand to prevent removal of G-tube and/or self-injury. Monitor and document every shift for safety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment is kept free of accident hazards. This was found to be evident for 1 (#178) of 31 resident rooms observed on the 4 [NAME] Unit during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey.Findings include:On 4/20/26 at approximately 10:00AM an observation screening was conducted on the 4 [NAME] Unit. Upon entering Resident # 178's room, a wooden mousetrap was observed on the windowsill. The resident was lying in bed at the time of the observation. At this time the surveyor requested a dual observation to be done with GNA # 14 who was in the hallway at this time. The GNA observed the mousetrap on the windowsill and stated that it should not have been in the windowsill and proceeded to remove it, and it snaped shut. The GNA stated that the mat that was on the floor next to the bed was placed there for safety. She confirmed that the resident ambulates in the room but does have confusion.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care from competent, properly trained nursing staff in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #140) of 5 residents reviewed for staff competency and had the potential to place residents at risk for aspiration and other adverse outcomes.Findings include:On 4/20/26 at approximately 9:30 AM, during observation rounds, Resident #140 was observed lying in bed at approximately a 15-degree elevation while being fed by a care provider who was seated beside the bed. During the observation, the resident was heard yelling, my stomach hurts.The surveyor asked the care provider whether the resident's head should be elevated during feeding. The care provider stated, no. The resident identified the individual as his/her caregiver, stating that she feeds him/her regularly and provides care. The caregiver confirmed this information.When asked about her credentials, the care provider stated she was not a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to make reasonable effort to substitute alternative meal through observations of meals not being eaten. This was evident for 1 (Resident #193) out of 1 residents reviewed for food/drink during the annual survey.The findings include: An observation regarding Resident #193 that occurred on 04/20/2026. At 1:25 PM, the resident declined their lunch tray, informing Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #15 that the food was too hard and that they do not eat fish. The resident stated an egg salad sandwich would be nice. Despite this direct request, GNA #15 took no action to contact the kitchen for an alternative meal.At 1:31 PM, this surveyor alerted the Unit Manager #7, who visited the room and heard the resident repeat the request for egg salad sandwich. The Unit Manager noted that GNA #15 omitted a request for the resident, who was hungry. The kitchen was subsequently notified to prepare an alternative tray; later the resident was observed eating and finishing an egg salad sandwich.Conducting a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #10) out of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 4/22/2026 at 9:07AM, during a review of Resident #10's electronic medical record, the Surveyor discovered that the resident was hospitalized on [DATE] due to shortness of breath. However, further review revealed the Notification of Discharge/Transfer from HHGW was not completed until 12/2/2025.On 4/22/2026 at 11:25AM, a review of the Resident Response List for discharges and transfers from November 2025, which was emailed to the Ombudsman 12/4/2025 at 9:04AM, failed to include Resident #10's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. DON #2 confirmed that Resident #10 was not on the list. Additionally, a review of the Resident Response List for discharges and transfers from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews with a resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's call system was functioning properly. This was found to be evident for 1 resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) out of 36 resident rooms observed on 2 East [NAME]-Kogod Unit during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 4/20/2026 at 9:30AM, during an initial tour of 2 East [NAME]-Kogod, the Surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #31 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During the interview, the Surveyor was informed that that call system in his/her room did not work because he/she pressed the call button and no one came to assist them. The resident pressed the call button. The call light above the resident's door failed to illuminate. The call station at the nurses' station failed to activate a call from room [ROOM NUMBER].During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #16), the Surveyor expressed the concerns that Resident #31 stated the call system in their room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep the resident free from verbal and mental abuse as evidence by a social worker demonstrating verbal and non-verbal aggressive behavior toward the resident which caused and had the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, shame, agitation, and/or degradation and did not promote an environment to enhance the resident's dignity. An observation of Resident 17 (R17) on 10/17/25 at 9:40 a.m., revealed a well-groomed person lying in bed who had just finished eating lunch independently. R17 was pleasant and engaging with good recollection of the incident. The room was clean, uncluttered and odor free. An interview with R17 on 10/17/25 at 9:40 a.m., revealed he/she recalled the incident with the Social Worker (SW24) in detail. R17 stated SW24, talked a lot and always had a negative connotation or attitude and that was typical of SW24. R17 stated during the incident, SW24 Jumped up and shouted and screamed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record revies, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident 20 utilizing an elopement prevention device as evidenced by R20's elopement from the monitored area and the building of residence for approximately 2 hours. An observation of Resident 20 (R20) on 10/14/25 at 1:20 p.m. revealed a well-groomed person sitting on the side of the bed eating lunch. R20 also had water and juice within reach and, he/she did not require assistance with eating. There was no observable WanderGuard in place. The room was clean, cluttered and odor free. An observation of R20's unit 10/14/25 at 1:20 p.m., unit revealed there were cameras pointing toward the exit door and one in the middle, pointing toward the nursing station. The elopement monitoring system testing was observed and appeared to be working properly. An interview with R20 on 10/14/25 at 1:20 p.m. revealed he/she did not have a WanderGuard device in place. When asked about leaving the building, R20 stated, I can't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents with documentation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin within 2 hours of the allegation to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 18 (#631, #647, #646, #627, #641, #637, #621, #5, #620, #250, #94, #229, #157, #96, #278, #264, #77, and #48) residents of 60 facility reported incidents reviewed during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 1/27/25 at 10:12 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00188273 revealed Resident #631 alleged that he/she was raped 5 nights prior by multiple guys. On 1/26/23 at 16:25 (4:25 PM) the daughter informed facility staff. The facility's investigation included an email confirmation as to when the initial report was sent to OHCQ. Review of the email confirmation documented the email was sent to OHCQ on 1/26/23 at 8:55 PM. This was not within 2 hours of the allegation. On 1/28/25 at 2:15 PM the facility reported incident was reviewed with the DON #1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation that allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 9 (#629, #638, #640, #366, #625, #5, #622, #87, and #619) residents of 60 facility reported incidents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The Minimum Dats Set (MDS) is a standardized and comprehensive assessment screening tool used to identify resident's individual needs and areas of concern. BIMS stands for Brief Interview for Mental Status. It is a screening tool used to assist with identifying a resident's current cognition and to help determine if any interventions need to occur. 1) On 1/28/25 at 11:30 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00167904 was conducted and revealed a Clinical Team Manager received an email on 5/31/21 that stated on 5/30/21 around 2pm, Resident #629 complained to a musical therapist that he/she was raped 3 weeks ago. Review of the facility's investigation revealed that 36 staff were interviewed, however…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) ensure the labeling, dating, and expiration of nourishment items, 2.) ensure a sanitary environment in the nourishment refrigerator and 3.) ensure dishwashing machines met the minimum required manufacturer temperatures recommended for sanitization. This was evident for: 1.) 1 reach-in refrigerator in 1 out of 2 of the facility's kitchens, 2.) 1 nourishment refrigerator in 1 out of 2 of the facility's kitchens, and 3.) 3 out of 4 dishwashing machines, during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1.) On 1/27/25 at 8:11AM during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility's kitchens, the surveyor observed the reach-in refrigerator located in the main kitchen which contained trays containing the following items which had no labeling or dates present to indicate preparation or expiration dates: plates of orange slices, cold salad sandwiches, approximately 14 individual containers of fruit with cream base, approximately 27 individual containers of cottage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 9 (Resident #366, #63, #367, #615, #626, #628, #644, #649, and #650) resident of 108 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 1/29/25 at 11:49 AM a review was conducted of Resident #366's medical record. Review of the miscellaneous section of the medical record revealed a Hospital Transfer summary for another resident, Resident #367 dated 5/16/24. There were 2 transfer summary entries. There were 22 pages of medical information on the first transfer summary that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's pest activity logs and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This was evident for 1 of 2 buildings reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During investigation of multiple complaints including August and October 2024 regarding mice in the facility's [NAME] building from residents' responsible parties the surveyor requested on 2/4/25 the facility's pest control logs from September 2024 through February 4th, 2025. Interview with Staff #23 (Vice President of Building Services) on 2/4/25 at 10:45 AM, Staff #23 states the facility consists of 2 buildings and each building maintains a pest control log at the front desk for the pest control company to address any concerns. Staff #23 stated the pest control company comes to the facility 3 times a week. Review of the Pest Activity Log on 2/4/25 for the [NAME] Building revealed the following entries in patient care areas: 9/2/24 room [ROOM NUMBER] mouse droppings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to notify a resident's physician and/or responsible party for a change in status in a timely manner (Resident #630, #643). This was evident for 2 of 108 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) The facility staff failed to notify Resident #630's physician and responsible party for changes in the Resident's pressure ulcer. Review of Resident #630's medical record on 1/29/25 revealed on 3/20/23 the Resident was assessed to have a Stage II sacral pressure ulcer. Further review of Resident #630's medical record revealed on 3/30/23 the Resident was assessed by the Wound care doctor to have a Unstageable sacral pressure ulcer. A) Further review of Resident #630's medical record revealed the Wound care doctor saw the Resident weekly except for 4/20/23, 7/3/23, 7/10/23, 7/27/23, 8/3/23 and 8/17/23. On those dates there is no documentation in the medical record the facility staff reviewed the Resident's wound status with Staff #58 (Primary physician) to determine if the wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews with the staff and resident, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's oral/dental status. This was found to be evident in 1 (Resident # 269) of 4 residents reviewed for the MDS assessment during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure each resident receives the appropriate care they need. On 01/31/25 at 10:59 AM, Resident # 269's medical record was reviewed. The resident was initially admitted in February 2024 to the facility after undergoing abdominal surgery. Around mid-April 2024, the resident was hospitalized due to high ostomy output and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 1/31/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addresses resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that was identified in the admission comprehensive assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #89) of 4 residents care plans reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey process. The findings include: On 01/28/25 at 09:54 AM, in an interview with the resident's (Resident #89) representative, it was expressed to the surveyor that on 1/27/25 the resident had an episode of incontinence, the resident representative stated that the staff was notified of the resident's incontinence; however, incontinence care was not provided until a couple of hours later. On 01/29/25 at 11:23 AM, a review of the Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) task list for Resident #89 in the month of January 2025 revealed that incontinence care was documented once on 1/27/25 at 1:36 AM. On 01/29/25 at 11:23 AM, review of the medical record revealed that the resident was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident medical records and interviews with resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed 1) to involve/invite a resident who had the capacity, to attend his/her own care plan meetings, and 2) to revise the resident's care plan after the resident developed a stage 2 sacral pressure ulcer. This was evident for 2 residents (Resident #96 and #963) out of 4 residents reviewed for care plan during the Medicaid/Medicare recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 01/28/25 at 10:47 AM, during the initial screening of Resident #96, when he/she was asked if he/she or someone that he/she had appointed, had been to meetings where his/her own plan of care care was discussed, he/she stated that he/she has never attended one because nobody ever told him/her about any meeting. On 01/29/25 at 09:32 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic health records of the resident revealed that Resident #96's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score for all quarters in 2024 was 15.0 out 0f 15.0. It also revealed that Resident #96 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a complaint, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required assistance received showers twice per week. This was evident for 1 (#636) of 30 residents reviewed for complaints during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 1/30/25 at 9:16 AM a review of complaint MD00195642 revealed an allegation that Resident #636, hardly ever got a bath. Review of Resident #636's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in December 2022 from an acute care hospital for rehabilitation and strengthening. Review of the 12/24/22 admission MDS documented that the resident required physical help related to bathing. Review of the shower log indicated that the resident was supposed to receive a shower twice per week on Monday and Thursday. Review of the GNA Documentation Report for January 2023 revealed blank spaces for every Monday and Thursday in January, which were 1/2/23, 1/5, 1/9, 1/12, 1/16, 1/19, 1/23, and 1/26/23. On 1/31/25 at 9:00 AM an interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility reported incident and complaint, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed 1) to provide care to meet the needs of a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial health, 2) to ensure that residents receive treatment and care to promote the highest practicable wellbeing as evidenced by failures to consistently assess a resident for pain and failures to follow physician orders timely, and 3) to acquire a patient's medication to be administered thereby causing a delay in treatment. This was evident for 3 (Resident #131, #614, and #913) of 108 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) The facility staff failed to properly perform neuro checks after a fall for Resident #614. A neuro check after a fall refers to a neurological assessment performed by a healthcare professional to evaluate potential brain injuries by checking a person's level of consciousness, orientation, pupil response, muscle strength, sensation, and coordination. Review of the facility's 72 hour assessment protocol provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on investigating complaints, medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #630 and #660). This is evident for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings included: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to address appropriate care when a resident had weight loss. This was evident for 1 (Resident #660) of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition during this recertificate survey. The findings include: During an investigation of the facility's self-reported incident, MD00208505, on 2/03/25 at 9:27 AM, it was revealed that Resident #660's family members were concerned about the resident's significant weight loss. The surveyor reviewed Resident #660's medical records on 2/03/25 at 9:40 AM; the review revealed that the resident's body weight as below: - initial body weight was 210 lb. (pound) on 5/03/24 via wheelchair, - On 5/14/24: 205.2 lb (4.8 lb , 2% loss from the initial weight) via a mechanical lift, - On 5/22/24: 200.8 lb. (9.2 lb, 4.3 % loss from the initial weight) via a mechanical lift, - On 5/28/24: 192.6 lb. (17.4 lb, 8% loss from initial weight) via a mechanical lift. On 2/03/25 at 10:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct the annual performance review for the Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA). This was identified for 1 of 3 GNA employee record (GNA #71) reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey process. The findings include: On 02/04/25 at 10:00 AM, during the staffing facility task the surveyor reviewed 3 GNAs' employee records. The record review revealed that the facility failed to provide signed documented evidence to support that GNA #71's performance review and in-service education based on the performance review results was completed in the year 2023 and 2024 as required. On 02/06/25 12:53 PM, in a telephone Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON #1), the DON #1 stated that GNA #71's performance review and competency assessment was missed in the year 2023. The 2024 performance review was documented; however, it was not signed because GNA #71 works on a PRN (as needed) schedule. On 02/07/25 at 10:24 AM, in an interview with the DON #1, she was asked if there was a competency assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the monitoring for side effects for a psychotropic medication for Resident #25. This was evident for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 1/29/25 at 8:30AM the surveyor conducted a review of the medical record of Resident #25 and observed the following medical order dated as beginning on 1/4/25 for the following medication that they were receiving: Escitalopram Oxalate Oral Tablet 20 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. Further review by the surveyor of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed side effect monitoring had not been instituted for the use of this psychotropic medication. On 1/29/25 at 9:27AM the surveyor conducted an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #35 who reported to the surveyor that the process the facility uses for monitoring of side effects for residents receiving psychotropic medications is that a separate order is instituted on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews with staff and the resident, observation, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate dental care. This was evidenced by the resident's dental status not being accurately monitored and failing to have follow-up dental service. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 269) of 1 resident reviewed for dental care during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 1/31/2025 at 10:59 AM, a medical record review for Resident # 269 was conducted. The review revealed that the resident was admitted to this facility in February 2024 after undergoing abdominal surgery. Around mid-April 2024, the resident was hospitalized due to high ostomy output and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 1/31/2024 at 11:45 AM, a review of the Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed that it was documented the presence of own teeth, and the re-admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] documented the presence of partial lower dentures.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store food items correctly with use-by dates in the kitchen freezers and refrigerators, and failed to serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination. This was evident for 2 of 2 kitchens observed for proper and safe food storage and and in 2 of 11 dining rooms that had steam table service. The findings include: 1. Surveyor observation of the kitchen determined that the facility staff failed to have use-by dates on open packages and containers of food items stored in the freezers and the refrigerators in the facility kitchens. a. On 12-16-18 at 8:38 AM, surveyor observation of the walk-in dairy freezer in the [NAME] building kitchen revealed open packages of cheese manicotti, sliced frozen peaches, and [NAME] pastry sweets were not labeled with use by dates. In the walk-in dairy refrigerator, surveyor found an open flounder fish fillet package, a container of French dressing, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of the clinical records, surveyor observations, and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents selected for the Dignity review was treated with respect and dignity by staff (Resident #237). The findings include: On 12-17-19 at 11:00 AM surveyor interview with Resident #237 revealed concerns with attitudes from some of the Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) at the facility. Further interview revealed the resident stated that the facility needed to provide additional training's to the GNA staff on the caring for and speaking to residents. The resident declined to give specific information of individual GNA staff members. On 12-19-19 at 5:15 PM observation of staff interactions with Resident #237, in the resident's room, revealed GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant) #4 entered the resident's room without knocking on the door nor awaiting for a response to enter. Further observation revealed GNA #4 informed the resident that she had come to pick up the resident's dinner selection menu. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-12-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure accurate documentation of the clinical records for 3 of 40 residents selected during the survey (Residents #164, #255, and #487). The findings include: 1. On 12-18-19 surveyor review of the clinical record for Resident #164 revealed the resident was totally dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), including personal hygiene, bathing and toileting needs. Further record review revealed the resident was scheduled to receive a shower every Wednesday and Saturday by the 3:00 PM -11:00 AM facility staff. Record review of the November and December 2019 ADL documentation flowsheet ,completed by the assigned GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant), revealed no evidence that the resident had received showers on the designated days. Further review revealed GNA documentation that the resident had received a Bed Bath and not a shower as scheduled. On 12-19-19 at 2:30 PM surveyor interview with the 4 [NAME] Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ENLOW, DEANNAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/12/2016
LEDERMAN, BRUCEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/07/2017
STETTES, KARENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 05/15/2017
TANNER HILL, TERRIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/18/2010
BARAF, ALISONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2017
COHEN, IRVINGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1997
DISTENFELD, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2003
DUBICK, DRAGAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2017
DYKES, ARTHURIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1995
FREEMAN, ALANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2005
FREISHTAT, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/11/2011
FRIEDLANDER, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1995
GUMER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2008
HARRISON, HARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2003
KAPLAN, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1998
KARP, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/22/2017
KLAIMAN, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2006
LAKE, PEARLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2015
MEYERS, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2016
PURETZ, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2015
RAMS, JACQUELINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2017
ROBINSON, PAULAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2015
RUBEN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1997
RULNICK, AARONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2013
SAFFITZ, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1994
SAMUELS, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1999
SANDERS, SAMUELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2017
SOLOMON, MARCIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/1989
WEST, NATALIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$57.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 18%Other / private 15%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$479per resident / day
operating cost
$14,551per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$410per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215071. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next