No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brooke Grove Rehab. & Nsg Ctr

18131 Slade School Road, Sandy Spring, MD 20860 · Non profit - Corporation · 190 certified beds · (301) 924-5176 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (301) 924-5176 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
18111 Prince Philip Dr · (301) 634-4800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
18101 Prince Philip Dr · (301) 260-8710 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18169 Town Center Dr · (301) 260-1792 · Call to confirm hours
Park
18605 Tanterra Way · (301) 774-9712 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1310 Olney Sandy Spring Rd · (301) 774-7047

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.5%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.2%22.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened35.9%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.7%16.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.6%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.7%25.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.7%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.7%80.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.3%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.051.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.151.201.80better

‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,051 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.30
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 455 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 81% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.6%CMS range 51.2–57.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.7%CMS range 11.7–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.4%CMS range 4.1–6.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.00
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
29.9%
Total nursing turnover
32.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 165.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12 ↓
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-22)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the dignity of the residents during meal times. This was evident for 1 (#148) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity during this annual survey.The findings include:On 5/21/2026 at 10:11 AM, the surveyor visited Resident #148 and noted that the resident had not eaten breakfast yet. The surveyor asked Resident #148 if they had had their breakfast. Resident #148 responded that they had not had breakfast and that they were hungry. The surveyor then asked the roommate if they had breakfast already. The roommate answered yes and said that it was around 9 AM when they received their tray. The surveyor then asked the roommate if anyone had come in to feed Resident #148. The roommate responded that she had not seen anyone yet. When the surveyor was leaving the room, the GNA (GNA #18) for the Resident #148 came in with the tray to feed the resident. The Unit Manager (UM #8) was interviewed and asked why the resident had not eaten. UM #8 stated that GNA #18 was working with another resident who had had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident's ability to self-administer medication, and to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for safe self-administration. This was found to be evident for 1 (#144) of 32 residents observed during initial screening on the 1st floor rehab units.The findings include:On 5/18/2026 at 10:44AM, during an initial tour of the 1st floor rehab unit, the Surveyor observed Resident #144 in possession of a white paper medicine cup containing multiple pills. The resident stated I like to take my pills slowly, one at a time. The nurse will come back to check on me. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #17 was subsequently seen entering the room.The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a standardized, comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status to develop a plan of care based on the resident's individualized needs.On 5/20/2026 at 10:55AM, a review of Resident #144's Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment accepted 4/16/2026 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Medicare beneficiaries with 1) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage and 2) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage. This was evident for 1 (#33) of 3 residents selected for Beneficiary Protection Review.The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage form (CMS-10055) provides information to residents/beneficiaries that services may no longer be covered by Medicare and addresses the resident's liability for payment should they wish to continue receiving the skilled services.The Notice of Medicare Non-coverage form (CMS-10123) informs the beneficiary of his/her right to file an appeal of the decision and the right to an expedited review of Medicare non-coverage of services.1.On 5/22/26 at 8:23 AM, a review of the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form (CMS-10055), completed by the facility, indicated that Resident #33 was not provided with the CMS-10055 form. The facility checked the box for the option that states *If NOT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to a quiet, home-like environment. This was evident for 1 resident (#159) of 4 residents reviewed for safe/clean/comfortable home environment.The findings include:During an interview, on 05/18/26 at 12:35 PM, Resident #159 expressed significant frustration regarding ongoing noise levels that interfered with their ability to have proper rest and sleep. The resident reported that there has been no improvement despite previous complaints, specifically identifying the sound of dragging furniture and staff members laughing, joking, and singing loudly near their room. During the interview on 05/18/26, surveyor personally observed loud conversation and laughing from staff in the hallway that could be heard from within the resident's room. During an interview held on 05/19/26 at 10:49 AM, the Unit Manager #8 noted she was already aware of the concerns raised. She stated that she was to look into the matter further.However, a follow-up interview with Resident #159 on 05/20/26 at 3:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and facility staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the local Ombudsman was notified of resident transfers to the hospital. This was found to be evident for 2 (#9, #10) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 5/21/26 at 10:03 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #9's BGRNC Hospital Transfer Form 4.0, dated 2/17/26, which indicates that Resident #9 was hospitalized on [DATE] due to an abnormal abdominal x-ray. On 5/21/26 at 11:22 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's Admissions/Discharges 2/1/26 to 2/28/26 list that was sent to the local Ombudsman's office via email on 3/3/26, and Resident #9's name was not included on the list for being transferred to the hospital on 2/17/26. On 5/21/26 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Nursing Home Administrator, (NHA #1). During the interview, the surveyor mentioned to the NHA #1 that Resident #9 was not included on the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was reviewed after admission to the facility and revised to reflect the resident's current status. This was found to be evident for 1 (#113) of 5 resident PASARR's reviewed during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:The PASARR process requires that all applicants to Medicaid-certified nursing facilities be screened for possible serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions. This initial pre-screening is referred to as PASARR Level I, and is completed prior to admission to a nursing facility. A negative Level I screen permits admission to proceed and ends the PASARR process unless a possible serious mental disorder or intellectual disability arises later. A positive Level 1 screen necessitates an in-depth evaluation of the individual by the state-designated authority, known as PASARR Level II, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication in a timely manner and according to professional standards of practice. This was found to be evident for 1 (#133) of 32 residents observed during the initial tour of the 1st floor rehab unit.The findings include:On 5/18/2026 at 1:00PM, during an interview with Resident #133, the Surveyor was informed that his/her medications were frequently given late, particularly during the evening shift (3:00PM-11:00PM).On 5/21/2026 at 2:18PM, a review of Resident #133's Medication Administration Report (MAR) revealed that medications were administered as ordered by documentation of a check mark, unless otherwise noted.On 5/21/2026 at 2:39PM, a review of Resident #133's Medication Admin Audit Report from 4/29/2026 through 5/21/2026 revealed:-5/2/2026 Olmesartan Medoxomil Oral Tablet 40 MG and Labetalol HCl Oral Tablet 200 MG scheduled at 8:00PM, administered at 10:21PM, and documented at 10:21PM-5/5/2026 sulfasalazine Oral Tablet 500 MG scheduled at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the The facility failed to provide on-going personalized activities to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was evident for 2 (#15 , #7) of 5 residents reviewed for the personalized activities during an annual survey. The findings include:1.Observation, on 05/18/26 at 1:00 PM and 3:15 PM Resident #15 was in their room dozing off while sitting in the wheel chair. There was no evidence that the activity staff provided any one-to-one interaction, personalized activities, or any device/materials offered for the resident to use.Further interview, it was noted that Resident #15 attended group activities occasionally. However, this resident expressed a desire for more suitable options, specifically focus on creativity.A record review conducted on 05/19/26 indicates that the resident was admitted to this facility on 05/20/17. Their diagnoses include schizoaffective disorder, depression, hypoxia, and diverticulitis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure post-surgical care recommendations were timely implemented and monitored according to professional standards. This was evident for 1 (#176) of 2 Residents reviewed for accidents during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:On 5/18/26 at 8:52 AM the surveyor observed Resident #176 laying in bed wearing a neck brace with facial injuries present. Review by the surveyor on 5/20/26 at 12:05PM of the nursing admission assessment documentation present on Resident #176's medical record dated 5/12/26 revealed the following information: S/P fall with diagnosis of C2 cervical fracture, wear a hard collar.On 5/20/26 at 12:11PM the surveyor conducted a review of Resident #176's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] which documented the following information: 1.) Resident #176 had a fall prior to their hospital admission which resulted in a cervical fracture and a cervical subluxation, 2.) A recommendation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication order parameters were followed and ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication. This was evident for 1 (#178) of 5 Residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: Surveyor review of Resident #178's medical record on 5/22/26 at 12:57PM revealed a May 2026 Medication Administration Record showing the following medication order with parameters:-Aldactone Oral Tablet 25MG, Give one tablet by mouth in the afternoon for CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), Hold for systolic bp (blood pressure) <110 or diastolic bp <60, start date 4/24/2026 1600, d/c (discharge) date 5/21/2026, 2048.Further surveyor review of the May 2026 Medication Administration Record revealed documentation showing that Aldactone medication was administered outside these parameters on 5/14/26, with a documented blood pressure of 115/50 by Nurse #13.On 5/22/26 at 1:20PM the surveyor conducted an interview of the facility's Administrator and shared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food temperature logs and store food and drinks in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice has the potential to affect residents who eat the food and receive thickened drinks prepared in the facility's main kitchen and satellite kitchens located on rehab floor #1 and #2.The findings include:1.On 5/18/2026 at 8:00AM, during a tour of the main kitchen, the Surveyor observed the tray line of food being plated and trays prepared to serve residents on the long-term care unit.On 5/18/2026 at 8:25AM, an observation of the food temperature log binder failed to reveal food temperatures recorded for:-5/16/2026 breakfast and lunch-5/17/2026 breakfast and lunch-5/18/2026 breakfastOn 5/18/2026 at 8:26AM, the Surveyor's findings were confirmed by Executive Chef #14. During an interview, the Surveyor was informed that to ensure proper food temperatures before serving residents, food temperatures are taken while the food is on the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention and control practices. Specifically, the laundry service area was not maintained in a sanitary manner, failing to provide an environment free of cross-contamination. This was evident by the whole laundry service areas observed during an annual survey. The findings include:A tour of the laundry service area was conducted on 05/21/26 at 2:25 PM, the following issues were observed in the service area: - A personal iPad in a small old shopping bag was left on a side table in the washing room.- The top shelves of the dryer room were filled with staff's personal belongings, food and drinks.- A makeshift eating area was set up within the dryer room.During an Interview, on 05/21/26 at 2:35 PM, the Housekeeping Director #19 stated that all laundry staff has designated personal items lockers which he declared that there should be no personal items in the Laundry service area. He confirmed that the makeshift eating area was an oversight.During an interview on 05/21/26 at 4:39 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 2 (Resident #7, #8) of 6 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.1) On 3/27/26 at 9:50 AM a review of facility reported incident 2652256 was conducted and revealed on 10/23/25 Resident #7 was found in a seated position on the floor beside the bed. A left hip x-ray was ordered and Resident #7 was found to have a non-displaced femoral neck impaction fracture. Review of Resident #7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #2). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for narcotic medication administration during a complaint survey.The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. Review of Resident #2's medical record on 3/26/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in March 2026, had a fall on 3/6/26 and was sent to the hospital on 3/9/26. Review of Resident #2's March 2026 Medication Administration Record revealed the Resident received Tramadol 25 mg on March 8th, 2026 at 9:23 AM. Tramadol is a narcotic pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain. Review of Resident #2's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative and medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to report allegations of resident abuse in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 8 (Resident #193, #169, #191, #24, #170, # 172, #188, #194) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse during the facility's survey. Findings include, 1. Intake MD00212529 was reviewed on 3/31/25 at 10:43 AM for allegations of abuse. Review of the facility's investigation revealed that a PRN (as needed) Physical Therapist (PT) (#17) observed Resident #193 and Nurse (#18), forcefully administer medication to the resident, and continued, even after the resident began choking. Abuse was unsubstantiated. Further review of a statement by the PT (#17), she stated that she went to report her observations to the charge nurse but did not see her. A few hours later the PT #17 saw the nurse (#18) in the hallway who approached her. An interview was conducted with the Therapy Site Manager (TSM #16) on 3/31/25 at 11:01 AM and he was asked if he could provide information regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation of allegations of abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced in 4 (#170, #172, #188, #194) of 4 facility reported incident investigations reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1. On 03/27/25 at 9:14 am a review of the self-report related to Resident #188 revealed the resident reported being abused by a nurse. The alleged perpetrator's statement indicated they did not work with the resident on the day of the alleged incident, nor did the statement deny or confess that the alleged incident happened. The staff who worked with the resident the day the alleged incident was reported was not interviewed. The facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation. The Director of Nursing #2 was made aware. 2. On 03/27/25 at 2:48 pm after reviewing the facility's investigation related to the allegation of abuse concerning Resident #170, Administrator #1 and Director of Nursing (DON) #2 were made aware the investigation of the alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure food items in the kitchen and unit refrigerator were stored to maintain the integrity of the specific items and failed to ensure equipment temperature logs were maintained for monitoring. This was evidence in observations in the kitchen and west wing refrigerators. The findings include: 1a) On 03/26/25 at 07:41 AM, an initial observation of the facility kitchen vegetable fridge revealed a bag of spinach opened and unlabeled, a bag of iceberg lettuce opened and unlabeled, a carrot bag opened and unlabeled, tahini opened and unlabeled, honey mustard salad dressing opened and unlabeled, a vanilla butter cream container that was opened and unlabeled, pre-poured french dressing into single size cups unlabeled, ranch dressing in a container which indicated best by 3/17/25, a container of garlic that had a label which indicated best by 3/24/25, and a small, white colored take out container that was unlabeled. On 03/26/25 at 07:46 AM, the surveyor observed a white, salad dressing- like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of a facility reported incidents (FRI), and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's request was accommodated. This was evident for 1 out of 33 facility reported incidents (FRIs) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 3/28/2025 at 10:30AM, the Surveyor reviewed the investigative file for a FRI MD00202881, reported by the family member of Resident #195 on 2/21/2024 at 3:51 PM. The family member stated that on 2/18/2024 at 11 PM, the resident needed to adjust the bed settings, as [he/she] had severe and painful spinal arthritis. The family member reported that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #40 would not give the resident the bed controls because GNA#40 did not want the resident playing with the buttons. Further review of the investigative file revealed a statement from GNA #40 on 2/23/2024 at 1:58PM. GNA #40 stated that when she answered Resident #195's call light, the resident said, I'm flat on the bed I need my head up because I don't want to die here. GNA #40 responded, The head of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to prevent a resident from experiencing verbal abuse by an employee. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 191) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse during the survey. The findings include: The facility reported incident MD00210136 was reviewed on 3/28/25 at 12:06pm. According to the facility's investigation, a housekeeper (Staff #38) made inappropriate comments to Resident #191. The resident reported the incident to the facility on 9/21/24 at approximately 10:30am. The facility interviewed Staff #38 during their investigation, at which time Staff #38 admitted to the allegation made by the resident. Staff #38 was immediately terminated and escorted off the premises. The facility conducted interviews with other residents and staff during the investigation and determined that no other residents had been affected. On 3/31/25 at 11:51am, the Director of Nursing was interviewed regarding the facility reported incident and confirmed that the abuse allegation was substantiated by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for residents. This was evident for 2 (Resident #67 and #119) residents reviewed for activities during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments. It outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care needs. This helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. A Baseline Care Plan must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address resident specific health and safety concerns to prevent a decline or injury, and would identify needs for supervision, behavioral interventions, and assist with activities of daily living, as necessary. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a standardized, comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional, medical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect their communication needs. This was evident for 2 (Resident #91 and #124) of 3 residents reviewed for communication. The findings include: Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assuring the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised each quarter. 1. On 03/26/25 at 08:55 AM, an observation of Resident #124 revealed that the resident was speaking a native language. On 03/27/25 at 09:58 AM, review of Resident #124's care plan revealed that the resident had a language barrier, but failed to indicate what language the resident spoke. On 03/28/25 at 07:37 AM, an interview with Geriatric Nursing Assistant (Staff #30) revealed that the resident spoke a native language, but was unable to indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to: follow physician's orders for a resident receiving oxygen, including failure to document amount and method of oxygen delivery, failed to hold a resident's blood pressure medication based on the ordered parameter and failed to notify the physician and failed to continue assessments including neuro checks after a resident sustained a fall. This deficient practice was evident for 3 (#24, #81, #186) out of 3 residents' reviewed for physician's orders during the survey. The findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the long-term care unit #2 on 03/26/25 at 07:46 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #24 sitting upright in bed asleep with oxygen infusing at 2 liters (L) through a nasal cannula. A second observation was made at 9:42 AM, and the resident was awake in bed, and oxygen was infusing at 2L through a nasal cannula. On 03/27/25 at 02:20 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #24 sitting in bed awake with supplemental oxygen infusing at 3.5L through a nasal canula. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician supervised the medical care of a resident with a known functional and cognitive decline. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#186) residents reviewed for physician services during the survey. The findings include: On 03/31/2025 at 10:53 AM, a review of complaint MD00188081, revealed that the family of Resident #186 had concerns during a visit on 01/18/23. The family observed the resident inability to walk, chew food, follow commands, and expressive aphasia (difficulty speaking). The family reported concerns that the resident change in condition was not adequately addressed. A review of nursing notes dated 12/4/22 at 9:06 PM, indicated that Resident #186 had not resumed usual mobility since returning from the emergency department (ED) on 12/3/22. A review of the physician's note dated 12/5/22 at 1:09 PM indicated that Resident #186 was sent to the ED due to a change in mental status. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a psychiatric consult as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 (Resident #151) reviewed for behavioral-emotional care during the survey. The findings include: On 3/26/2025 at 11:58AM, during a tour of the 2nd floor rehab unit, the Surveyor observed Resident #151 in his/her bed facing the window opposite the doorway. The Surveyor knocked and introduced themselves. The resident stated, I want you to leave. I just want to sleep. The resident appeared upset and short tempered. The Surveyor apologized for bothering the resident and continued touring the unit. On 3/27/2025 at 2:00PM, the Surveyor observed Resident #151 cuddled in bed sleeping. An interview with Registered Nurse #41 revealed that the resident sleeps a lot and usually would wake up and open up more when their daughter comes to visit. The resident does not want to be bothered most of the time. On 3/28/2025 at 10:30AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a staff prepared a meal tray based on a meal ticket. This was evident for 1 tray identified during a random tray line observation. The findings include: On 03/27/25 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor observed the lunch tray line in the kitchen where staff prepare the resident trays that get delivered to the prospective units. On 03/27/25 at 12:03 PM, the surveyor observed Dietary Aide (Staff #31) prepare a meal tray . The meal ticket on the meal tray indicated chicken noodle soup as one of the food items listed. On 03/27/25 at 12:04 PM, the surveyor observed Staff #31, prepare and place the meal tray on the tray cart without chicken noodle soup. At the same time, the surveyor asked Staff #31, if soup was served on the units, she indicated no, and that the kitchen would prepare it. The surveyor requested Staff #31 to take off the meal tray that had just been placed on the tray cart and compare the meal tray to the meal ticket. On 03/27/25 at 12:05 PM, the surveyor asked why Staff #31 did not place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature. This was evident for 1 out of 1 observation of a kitchen tray line and test tray. The findings include: On 03/27/25 at 11:53 AM, the surveyor observed the kitchen prepare the lunch tray line. On 03/27/25 at 01:11 PM, the surveyor observed the last tray cart of the lunch tray line get delivered onto the unit. On 03/27/25 at 01:50 PM, the surveyor observed the last resident meal tray taken from the same cart and delivered to the prospective resident. The surveyor then requested Executive Chef (Staff #36), who was present at the time, to remove the test tray from the cart and obtain temperatures of the food items. On 03/27/25 at 01:50 PM, the surveyor observed Staff #36 obtain the temperature of the meatloaf which was 114.2 degrees fahrenheit, cod (a type of fish) which was 105.8 degrees fahrenheit, mashed potatoes which were 115.5 degrees fahrenheit, and vegetables (asparagus with garlic and red pepper) which was 107.0 degrees fahrenheit. On 03/27/25 at 01:51 PM, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that documentation was completed for physician orders. This was evident for 1 (Resident #167, #179) of 49 residents' records reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. On 03/28/25 at 01:58 PM, review of Resident #167's medical record revealed the resident had an order for continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute with a start date of 12/20/23 and an end date of 1/24/25. (Liters per minute refers to the amount of oxygen delivered to a patient per minute.) On 03/31/25 at 08:51 AM, review of the documentation for the order mentioned above in the resident's record for the month of September 2024, revealed 5 shifts (9/1/24 night, 9/7/24 day, 9/12/24 night, 9/23/24 day, and 9/26/24 day) which the order was not documented on. On 03/31/25 at 09:45 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (Staff #2) revealed that the expectation was for staff to document based on orders every shift. She further indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and a review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain signature sheets of committee members who attended Quality Assurance and Improvement Program (QAPI) meetings. This was found to be evident during review of QAPI documentation during the survey. Findings include: An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 4/1/25 at 11:08 AM and he was asked to provide the survey team with copies of attendance sheets for QAPI meetings from December 2023 to March 2025. The Administrator stated that the facility has a new QAPI Coordinator (#32) that started when he came on board. He offered that he would look for the attendance sheets but is unsure if he would be able to provide the attendance sheets prior to this time. An interview was conducted with the QAPI Coordinator (#32) on 4/1/25 at 11:25 AM and she stated that she became the QAPI Coordinator in December 2024. She stated that the previous Administrator conducted meetings (virtual) until she came into the position. She provided paper copies of attendance sheets for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment. This was evident for 1 (Unit 2) out of 1 clean utility rooms observed during the survey. The findings include: On 03/26/25 at 09:25 AM, the surveyor observed an equipment pole in the clean utility room which had a sticker that indicated it was used for a resident. On 03/26/25 at 09:25 AM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (Staff #37) revealed that housekeeping would clean the equipment pole and when it was clean it would be placed in the clean utility room. On 03/31/25 at 11:34 AM, an interview with the Director of Housekeeping/Environment Services revealed that when equipment poles are clean, the facility staff would place a blue tag at the base. When the surveyor described the state of the equipment pole observed on Unit 2, he indicated that he would not have considered it to be cleaned, and agreed with the surveyor's concern.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure all actively employed geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) completed annual dementia education. This deficient practice was evident for 6 out of 6 (#46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #52) GNA's training reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On 03/27/25 at 10:09 AM, during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #3, he stated that annual nursing assistant competencies are conducted throughout the year and on designated dates to ensure all required in-service are completed before the end of the year. The surveyor requested to review the competency records of current staff and agency GNA's. On 03/27/25 at 11:41 AM, during an interview with nurse scheduler #51, she explained that the facility's educator is responsible for ensuring that agency GNA's receive the required GNA education prior to working at the facility and the director of nursing generally reviews the GNA annual competencies during the employees annual performance review. The nurse scheduler #51 and the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to implement residents' wishes stated in their advance directive and failed to verify the authority of a medical decision maker on the MOLST (Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form. This was evident for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for advance directive care area (Residents #83 and #136). The findings include: A MOLST is the portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments used in Maryland. An Advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. 1. On 02-28-2020, surveyor review of Resident #83's clinical record revealed that the resident had an advance directive signed in December 2000 which stated that Resident #83 was required to be certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of resident council minutes, and staff interview (s) it was determined that facility staff failed to report an allegation of abusive behavior during mealtime. This finding was evident upon review of resident council minutes as part of the resident council facility task during survey. The findings include: On 02-28-2020 at12:10 PM, a review of resident council minutes, dated 01-13-20, revealed Resident #92 reported observing residents who require assistance with meals being subjected to abusive behavior by staff at mealtime. Resident #92 stated it was nerve-wracking watching them. On 02-28-2020 at 12:20 PM, interview with the Administrator and the Administrator in Training (AIT) revealed that both employees review the resident councils' minutes each month, however, neither were aware of Resident #92's allegation of abuse during the 01-13-2020 meeting. Upon listening to a recording of the meeting, the administrator confirmed that the minutes accurately reflected Resident #92's allegation made during the meeting. Upon further investigation, it was determined…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor clinical record reviews and interviews with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise residents' care plans. This was evident for 2 of 36 residents selected for this survey (Residents #101 and #132). MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. Quarterly review assessment is an assessment due no less frequently than every 92 days. The findings include: 1. On 02-26-2020 surveyor review of Resident #101's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. In addition, Resident #101 had a physician order for a psychotropic medication. A psychotropic medication is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: anti-psychotics, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. Further review of Resident #101's clinical record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, it was determined the facility staff failed to monitor psychotropic medications for efficacy and adverse consequences. This finding was evident for 1 of 5 (Resident #101) residents selected for review of unnecessary medications during the survey. A psychotropic medication is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: anti-psychotics, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. The findings include: On 02-26-2020, surveyor review of Resident #101's clinical record revealed the resident had a physician order for two psychotropic medications administered to be administered daily for treatment of psychosis and depression. However, further review of Resident #101's clinical record revealed no evidence of the facility's staff monitoring for the efficacy and adverse consequences of the psychotropic medications. On 02-27-2020 at 2:30 PM, surveyor interview with the director of nursing revealed no additional information.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and facility staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to label drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards. This finding was evident for 1 of 14 medication storage carts selected for inspection during the survey (Cart #10). The findings include: On 02-27-2020 at 11:47 AM, surveyor inspection of [NAME] wing Cart #10 on the second floor rehab unit revealed a bottle of Colace (stool softener) liquid with an expiration date of [DATE]. Further observations revealed a Humalog KwikPen (disposable single-patient-use prefilled pen) with an open date marked as 01-23-20. It should have been discarded 28 days after opening. In addition, there were three (3) yellow top, two (2) purple top, four (4) red top, one (1) blue top, and one (1) green top phlebotomy tubes (tubes used to draw blood for lab testing) that expired in 2019 stored in the medication Cart #10. On 02-27-2020 at 12:30 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor interview of residents and facility staff, and observation of tray line and meal service, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have an effective system to ensure that residents received the food items of their preference. This finding was evident during the dining observation for one of six dining rooms (Foxtrot). The finding includes: On 02-24-2020 at 8:50 AM, initial screening of Resident #08 revealed a complaint that he/she often got meals the consisted of food items not selected. On 02-24-2020 at 12:40 PM observation of Resident #08's lunch meal revealed the tray ticket and tray items were identical, however, the resident stated the items were not self-selected and were not what he/she would have chosen for that meal. On 02-24-2020 at 1:00 PM, observation of the [NAME] Trot dining room revealed meal tickets on trays that were inconsistent with items served on the tray. On 02-24-20 at 1:30 PM, a random observation of the ordered items for one lunch meal ticket indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This finding was evident for 1 of 5 dining areas observed in the facility. The findings include: On 02-24-2020 at 5:15 PM surveyor observed Resident #145 in dining area located in second floor rehab unit. The resident had a Supplemental nutrition drink named Vital. According to the label on the Vital, the use by date is 03-01-2018. An inspection of the refrigerator outside of the pantry revealed six (6) 8oz individual supplemental nutrition drinks that expired in March 2019. On 02-25-2020 at 12:00 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2020-02-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor interview of resident council representatives, a review of the residents' council meeting minutes, and interviews of facility staff and with the ombudsman, it was determined that the facility staff failed to adequately resolve repetitive concerns about meal service addressed in resident council meetings. This finding was evident during interview of representatives of the facility's resident council. The findings include: On 02-24-2020 at 8:50 AM, initial screening of Resident #08 revealed a complaint that the resident often received meals that consisted of food items the resident did not select from the menu. On 02-27-2020 at 3:00 PM, an interview of Resident Council representatives revealed a complaints of residents not receiving selected menu items at mealtime. The council representatives stated that this had been an ongoing issue for several months, and they did not feel facility staff responded appropriately, as the problem remained. On 02-28-2020, a review of the resident council minutes dated 10-21-2019 revealed the Resident Council President randomly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BROOKS, CAROLYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2012
DAVIDSON, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/08/2009
MALIN, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2020
MAZZEO, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2017
NDAHAYO, JOVIAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2010
WETMORE, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/08/2009
SPILLANE, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$28.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 45%Medicare 35%Other / private 20%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$500per resident / day
operating cost
$15,197per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$465per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 215200. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next