Harmony Suites Rehabilitation and Wellness Center
13908 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20904 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (301) 598-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $61,269 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-20)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.6% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.4% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.7% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.3% | 16.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.9% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.8% | 80.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.08 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 6.3–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 53.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, records review and facility investigative material the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and failed to implement appropriate interventions to prevent one Resident (R), R16, with a history of exit seeking behaviors from elopement, when R16 exited the facility without the facility knowledge for approximately eight hours. Out of 1 of 3 sampled Residents. The census was 90. Findings Include:A review on 3/17/26 at 9:15 am of the undated facility policy Elopement Prevention and Management Overview found that elopement occurs when a resident leaves the facility or a safe area without permission or supervision, putting them at risk. If a resident who can make decisions leaves on purpose, it is not usually considered elopement unless the facility did not know the resident left or where they were.The policy documents that the interdisciplinary team plans the least restrictive interventions to promote mobility and safety, and to meet the individualized needs and goals of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to supervise and provide protective devices for Residents that smoked. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #18 & #61) out of 4 Residents observed for smoking. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that this concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy, and the facility was notified verbally and in writing of this determination at 4:05 PM on 01/29/25. The facility provided a plan to remove the immediacy while the surveyors were onsite. The removal plan was accepted by the OHCQ at 8:37 PM on 01/29/25. On 01/30/25 the survey team confirmed the facility met the compliance date of their action plan and the Immediate Jeopardy was abated on 01/29/25. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice continued with a scope and severity of D with potential for more than minimal harm for the remaining residents The findings include: During a random observation conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff accurately document medication administration for each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This was evident for 3 (Resident #16, #3, and #97) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1)During the screening process of the survey on 5/12/26 at 09:41AM, Resident #16 stated that sometimes he/she gets his/her medications and sometimes he/she does not get them, because the nurse would say they are not available. The medical records review on 5/12/2026 at 1:05 PM noted that resident has a Brief Interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 15 (indicating intact cognition) with diagnoses not limited to hypertension, chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. Further medical record review on 5/12/2026 at 1:19 PM, found that the resident goes to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Further review of the residents' Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and facility staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's clinical status and physician-documented care for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9 and Resident #12). Facility failed to accurately code the presence of Intravenous (IV) access for Resident #9, and the administration of hypoglycemic medication, which was coded as administered when it had been placed on hold per physician orders for Resident #12. Findings included:Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma status post chemoradiation, chronic kidney disease stage 4, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review done on 3/16/26 at 6:25 pm of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #9 was moderately impaired with no intravenous (IV) access.Review done on 3/16/26 at 6:25 pm of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address a resident's central venous access device for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9). Findings include:Resident #9 was admitted to facility on 11/21/25 with diagnosis of high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma status post chemoradiation, Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm without rapture, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage 4, syncope and collapse, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, duodenal ulcer, dysphagia, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure with hypoxia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and duodenal ulcer. Review done on 3/16/26 at 6:25 pm of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #9 was moderately impaired. Review done on 3/16/25 at 6:31 pm of the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being by failing to assess, monitor and obtain appropriate treatment orders for an accessed implanted port for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9). The facility failed to initiated care from admission on [DATE] until 12/15/25, when physician orders were finally obtained, placing the resident at risk for complications including infection and loss of device patency. Findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to facility on 11/21/25 with diagnosis of high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma status post chemoradiation, Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm without rapture, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage 4, syncope and collapse, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, duodenal ulcer, dysphagia, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to follow established standards of practice for care and maintenance of an accessed central venous device (Port-a-catheter) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #9). These failures included not performing dressing changes, not maintaining aseptic technique, and leaving an accessed device (Huber needle- special type of needle used to access implanted ports) ) in place without proper care, placing the resident at increased risk for infection.Findings include:Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma status post chemoradiation, chronic kidney disease stage 4, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review done on 3/18/26 at 3:00 pm of facility's policy and procedures for Central Venous Catheter, Section 5.1, effective date 2/7/20, required changes on admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This was evident during the initial tour of the kitchen during the annual survey. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen conducted on 01/27/2025 at 8:52 AM, the Surveyor and Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) observed one clear bag of corn opened and undated and one clear bag of garlic bread opened and undated inside of a box labeled broccoli florets in the walk-in freezer. There was also one clear bag of Salsbury steak opened and undated on the top shelf of the walk -in freezer. In an interview conducted on 01/27/2025 at 8:58 AM, the CDM confirmed the facility's food storage policy is to securely close packages/bags once opened and to label the package/bag with an open date. The CDM stated that the printed expiration on the package/bag is used to determine when items are discarded. The CDM further stated that opened bulk food should be labeled with an open date once…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to have routine care plan meetings for residents. This was evident for 5 (Resident #36, #76, #1, #50 and #52) out of 39 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. The findings include: According to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) a care plan meeting is a regularly scheduled gathering where healthcare professionals, residents (or their family representatives), and relevant staff from a facility discuss and review a resident's individual care plan, ensuring it accurately reflects their needs, preferences, and any necessary adjustments based on their current health status; these meetings are typically held quarterly and are a key part of quality care in nursing homes. 1) During an interview with Resident #36 on 01/27/25 at 12:13 PM, when asked about attendance for care plan meetings, he/she reported that he/she did not recall being involved in care plan meetings. 2) During an interview with Resident #76 on 01/29/25 at 09:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rates were not 5% or greater. This was found to be evident for 13 medications errors out of 28 opportunities that resulted in a medication error rate of 46.42% for 3 (Resident #14, #55 and #20) out of 4 residents observed for medication administration. The findings include: According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) the Medication error rate is determined by calculating the percentage of medication errors observed during a medication administration observation. The numerator in the ratio is the total number of errors that the survey team observes, both significant and non-significant. The denominator consists of the total number of observations or opportunities for errors and includes all the doses the survey team observed being administered plus the doses ordered but not administered. The equation for calculating a medication error rate is as follows: Medication Error Rate = Number of Errors Observed divided by the Opportunities for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate. This was found to be evident for 5 (Resident #45, # 48, #77,#384 and #68) out of 5 Residents reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: 1) A blister pack/card is a form of tamper-evident packaging where an individual pushes individually sealed tablets through the foil in order to access the medication. The narcotic count must be completed by two licensed nurses at the end of each shift for all narcotics. The primary function of narcotic count is to ensure that narcotics are not being diverted or stolen for purposes not intended by the prescriber. On 1/29/2025 at 5:00 pm the surveyor reviewed the facility investigation file for the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) / Intake# MD00213015 dated 12/23/2024 that the facility self-reported to the Office of Healthcare Quality (OHCQ). The surveyor review of the investigation file revealed that on 12/21/2024 during the 3-11 shift narcotic count that the backs of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Resident was treated with dignity during care. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #75) out of 3 Residents reviewed for dignity during medication administration. The findings include: During an observation conducted on 01/29/25 at 7:39 AM, the Surveyors observed medication administration with Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) #33. The LPN entered Resident #75's room and administered his/her medications. The Resident bed was located near the entry door of the room. The LPN failed to close the entry to provide privacy and dignity during the medication administration. On 01/29/25 at 7:52 AM, the LPN confirmed he had not closed Resident #75's entry door and stated that it is the facility's expectation that dignity is always provided during the care to Resident. During an interview conducted on 01/29/25 at 8:02 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the expectation was that all staff provide care in a dignified manner which included closing the entry door while providing care to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident had access to the facility's communication system. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 2 Residents (Resident #76) observed for accommodation of needs during the re-certification survey. The findings include: During a random observation conducted on 01/27/25 at 9:44 AM, the Surveyors observed Resident #76's call bell on the floor behind the head of the bed. On 01/27/25 at 9:45 AM, during an interview, Resident #76 told the Surveyors that the call bell was always on the floor out of reach. The Resident stated that he/she usually did not have access to the call bell and as a result would yell out for help when assistance was needed. On 01/27/25 at 10:27 AM, the Surveyors and License Practical Nurse (LPN) #34 observed Resident #76's call bell on the floor behind the head of the bed out of reach for the Resident. The Surveyors observed the LPN remove the call bell from the floor and place the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and an interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Resident was offered information for an Advance Directive. This was evident for 1 (Resident #76) out of 1 resident reviewed for Advance Directives. The findings include: According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) the definition of an Advance Directive is a document that appoints an agent and records a patient's medical treatment wishes based on their values and preferences. Advance Directives can be different from state to state. A record review on 01/28/25 at 07:38 AM showed there was not an Advanced Directive found or documentation that Advance Directive information was offered in the electronic medical record of Resident #76. A review of Resident #76 ' s paper chart on 01/28/25 at 08:16 AM revealed there was not an Advanced Directive or documentation that Advance Directive information was offered in the chart. On 02/03/25 at 11:32 AM, while interviewing Social Worker (SW) #23, this surveyor asked what the process was for obtaining an Advanced Directive for a Resident. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Record Reviews and Interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide Beneficiary Notices to residents discharged from Medicare Part A Services with benefit days remaining. This was evident for 1(#19) out of 3 Residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. The findings include: The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) is provided to notify Residents/Beneficiaries that their services may no longer be covered by Medicare and allows the Resident time to decide on continuing services not covered. The Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) notice is provided to inform the Resident/Beneficiary of their right to file an Appeal of the decision and the right to an expedited review of Medicare non-coverage services. This form should be provided at least two days before the last day covered by Medicare. On 2/03/25 at 07:15 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) provided this surveyor with the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review Forms that had been provided to the facility for completion. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was found to be evident for 3 (Residents #23, #46 and #76) out of 4 Resident rooms observed for the physical environment. The findings include: 1) During an observation on 1/27/25 at 09:14 AM Resident #23 was found lying in bed with his/her television sitting on the bedside table turned off. The Resident was watching the television on the other side of his/her roommate ' s bed. An additional observation revealed another television lying on top of the Resident ' s portable closet. In the Resident ' s room, it was also found that the Hot water to the sink had no water flow upon turning the knob. There were also two ceiling tiles in his/her bathroom that were dislodged, angled downward and exposed the open space above the tiles. Additionally, there was an electrical socket behind the Resident ' s bed that had the electrical mounting box protruding out of the wall. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1) the resident's refusal to use palm protector and 2) the use of an anticoagulant. This was evident for 2 (Residents #32 and #53) of 39 residents reviewed for care planning during the recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Palm Protectors offer relief from hand contractures and cramping. They are put over the thumb and around the hand, providing a cushioning pad for the fingers to curl onto. This prevents the nails from digging into the palms and keeps the fingers warm and supported. A contracture is an abnormal shortening of muscle tissue causing the muscle to be resistant to stretching. Failure to protect the palm of the hand when the hand is contracted can result in injury to the palm of the hand caused by the pressure of fingers/fingernails pressing into the palm of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive podiatry services for overgrown toenails. This was evident in 1 (Resident #52) of 1 resident reviewed for podiatry care. The findings include: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Paraplegia, Seizures, Adult Failure to Thrive and Major Depressive Disorder. On 01/28/25 at 8:11 AM the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed. Resident #52's toenails on both feet were long, thickened and curled over the bottom of his/her toes. On 01/28/25 at 11:11AM a review of Resident #52's record revealed a physician order dated 10/17/24 for podiatry consult as needed. On 01/28/25 at 11:32 AM the surveyor interviewed Staff #9 and enquired about the process for podiatry care. Staff #9 stated that residents are assessed upon admission and as needed for podiatry care. The residents' facesheets and physician orders are then faxed to the podiatry service provider.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine appointments for vision services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #36) out of 1 resident reviewed for vision services. The findings include: During an interview conducted on 01/27/25 at 12:18 PM, Resident #36 reported having a concern with seeing an eye doctor. The Resident stated that he/she now sees little black spots and had lots of headaches. The Resident further stated that he/she reported the need to see an ophthalmologist for an eye exam and for the recent little black spots to the nursing supervisor. On 01/31/25 at 08:04 AM, a record review of Resident #36 ' s nurse notes showed a note from 1/9/2025 at 12:00 PM by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30. The note stated Resident complained of having dark spots before her eyes. Medical Staff notified. Stated that it has been ongoing for 7 days but did not report it to anyone. A review of Resident #36 physician orders revealed a consult by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #28 that was placed on 01/10/2025. The consult DX…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the prescribed treatment for limited mobility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #32) of 2 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility during the recertification survey. The findings include: A contracture is an abnormal shortening of muscle tissue causing the muscle to be resistant to stretching. Failure to protect the palm of the hand when the hand is contracted can result in injury to the palm of the hand caused by the pressure of fingers/fingernails pressing into the palm of the hand. Palm Protectors offer relief from hand contractures and cramping. They are put over the thumb and around the hand, providing a cushioning pad for the fingers to curl onto. This prevents the nails from digging into the palms and keeps the fingers warm and supported. On 1/27/25 at 9:45 AM, Resident #32 was noted with left hand contracture. Also, the left thumb fingernail was observed curled inwards approximately half of an inch long. There was no evidence of any device was worn on the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain respiratory therapy equipment according to professional standards of practice. This was found to be evident for 1 (#34) out of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the annual survey. The findings include: Ipratropium- Albuterol is a medication used to treat wheezing and shortness of breath. It can be administered via an inhaler or via a nebulizer. A nebulizer turns the medication into a fine mist that is inhaled into the resident's lungs. Nebulizer treatments are considered an aerosol-generating procedure (AGP). On 01/28/2025 at 11:35 AM, the surveyor observed a clear, plastic zip lock bag on Resident #34's bedside table that contained two nebulizer face masks and nebulizer tubing. The nebulizer face mask and nebulizer tubing were not labeled as to when they were put to use or should be replaced. On 01/31/2025 at 08:46 AM, a review of Resident #34's clinical record revealed the following physician order: Date 04/08/2024 Ipratropium-Albuterol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain medication was given consistent with the professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #53) of 2 residents reviewed for pain management during the recertification survey. The findings include: The medical abbreviation PRN stands for pro re nata, a Latin phrase that translates to as needed or as the situation arises. Oxycodone is strong painkillers from a group of medicines called opiates, or narcotics used to treat moderate to severe pain. Pain parameters are the specific aspects of pain that are evaluated during an interview to understand a person's pain experience. On 1/30/25 at 9:18 AM, a record review of Resident #53's active physician orders indicated that he/she was on Oxycodone HCl Oral Tablet 15 MG (Oxycodone HCl) Give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain level 5-10, hold for sedation. On 1/30/25 at 10:47 AM, further review of Resident #53's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the facility staff failed to follow the pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months for 2 (Staff #18 and #22) of 5 staff members reviewed. The findings include: Performance reviews are to be completed at least every 12 months to identify in-service education needed to address competencies of the geriatric nursing assistants. On 01/28/25 at 11:02 AM the surveyor conducted a review of 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants personnel files. Staff #18 was hired on 07/12/21 and Staff #22 was hired on 08/17/23. The records revealed that Staff#18's performance review was due on 05/31/24 and Staff #22's performance review was due on 08/17/24. A further review of the records revealed that performance reviews were not completed for Staff #18 and Staff #22 on the due dates, nor were they completed for the calendar year 2024. On 01/30/25 at 01:00PM in an interview with the Executive Director (EO), the surveyor was informed that annual performance reviews for geriatric nursing assistants were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to the recommendation made by consulting pharmacist in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 1/31/25 at 10:05 AM, a review of Resident #6's medications revealed an order that read, Dicyclomine HCl Oral Tablet 20 MG (Dicyclomine HCl) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for abdominal cramping. On 2/03/25 at 7:35 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #6's medical record, however, was unable to locate a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) in the electronic medical record and the paper chart. On 2/03/25 at 7:40 AM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #11), he/she described that after each consultant pharmacist visit. The pharmacy faxed the recommendations to the Director of Nursing (DON) and she forwarded the recommendations to be addressed by the attending physician. The physician indicated if there were changes that needed to be made to the current orders. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored properly. This was found to be evident for 3 (Residents #57& # 76 & 55) out of 5 Residents observed during medication storage. The findings include: 1) During a random observation conducted on 01/27/25 at 10:00 AM, the Surveyors observed Resident #57 at the entrance of his/her doorway. The Resident had asked a staff for water to take his/her medications. During an interview conducted on 01/27/25 at 10:02 AM, Resident #57 stated that the nurse put the medications on top of the nightstand to take after he/she ate breakfast. During an observation conducted on 01/27/25 at 10:07 AM, the Surveyors and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #34 observed a medication cup with multiple medications. LPN # 34 stated that Resident #57 wanted to eat breakfast before he/she took the medications. The LPN further stated that the facility's expectation was to return the medications to the medication cart and store them in a secured medication cart when a resident refused to take the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #36) out of 1 resident reviewed for dental services. The findings include: During an interview conducted on 01/27/25 at 12:18 PM, Resident #36 stated that he/she had dental concerns. The Resident stated that he/she had not had a teeth cleaning in 3 years and had requested to have a dental appointment. However, the facility had not provided a dental service as of yet. On 01/31/25 at 08:04 AM, a record review of Resident #36 ' s physician ' s orders showed a consult for Audiology, Dental, Optometry, Ophthalmology and/or Podiatry as needed placed on 12/26/2024 by Primary Attending Physician (PA) #29. During a follow up interview conducted on 01/31/25 at 11:04 AM, Resident #36 advised the surveyors that he/she notified PA #29 of the need for dental services. The Resident further stated that he/she had not been notified of a dental appointment scheduled since the notification to the PA. On 01/31/25 at 11:30 AM, this surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection prevention and control practices. This was found to be evident for the laundry department and 1(Resident #20) of 4 Residents observed for infection control. The findings include: 1) Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and required tube feeding for nutrition. On 01/28/25 at 08:15 AM during rounds the surveyor observed Resident #20 lying in bed with a bottle of tube feeding attached to a pump, hanging on a pole at the bedside. The pole was visibly dirty with dark brown spots scattered along the base and the shaft. On 01/28/25 at 10:17 AM a review of Resident #20's physician order dated 5/1/24 revealed that the resident required tube feeding for 20 hours per day via pump. On 01/28/25 at 11:44 AM Staff #9 was made aware of the condition of the pole. Staff #9 acknowledged the surveyor's findings and stated that the pole would be cleaned immediately. Staff #9 also stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe/functional/sanitary/comfortable environment. This was found to be evident in the laundry department during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: On tour of the laundry department in the basement of the facility on 1/30/2025 at 8:00 AM with the laundry aid #15 in attendance it was observed that there were four ceiling tiles grossly soiled with large brown stains, chipped, and missing. In an interview with the Environmental Services (EVS) Director #16 at 8:25 AM on 1/30/2025, the surveyor asked what the expectation was for the replacement of these ceiling tiles that were observed grossly soiled, chipped and missing in the laundry department. The EVS Director #18 stated that the Maintenance Department was responsible for the replacement of the ceiling tiles. The EVS Director #18 further stated that these ceiling tiles became soiled from the rain outside. The surveyor interviewed the Maintenance Assistant #6 on 1/30/2025 at 8:40 AM regarding the replacement of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility pest control records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This was evident for 4 of 4 random observations made during the annual survey. The findings include: During an initial tour of the facility on 1/27/2025 at 8:48 AM, the surveyor and Administrator observed a roach crawling in the hallway outside the kitchen door entry way. In an interview conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 1/27/2025 at 9:45 AM, the CDM stated that she had not seen roaches in the kitchen area. During a follow up tour of the kitchen on 01/29/2025 at 08:00 AM, the surveyor observed a roach crawling on the floor under the steam table while staff prepared breakfast meal trays for residents. During an interview conducted with the District Manager (DM) on 1/29/2025 at 8:25 AM, the DM stated that he had not seen roaches in the kitchen area. The DM further stated that pest control services visit the facility weekly and as needed. On 1/29/2025 at 8:32 AM, the surveyor, DM and CDM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure nursing standards of practice were followed for medication-controlled drugs and security. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #45, #48, #77 and #384) out of 4 Residents reviewed for medication-controlled drugs and security. The findings include: The Maryland Nurse Practice Act (NPA) is legislation that influences the nursing profession by establishing Maryland Board of Nursing rules and regulations which outlines requirements for Maryland nursing education programs, setting minimum care standards that must be met. The NPA exists to regulate and protect the public from practitioners who are a risk to the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens within its state board jurisdiction. This protection principle is accomplished by assessing competence at initial licensure and throughout the career of the nurse. The NPA protects the public from incompetent and unsafe care. The primary purpose of the NPA is to protect the public and sets out the scope of practice. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility-reported incident investigation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment from occurring while the investigation was in progress. This was evident for 1 (Resident #53) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 1/27/2025 at 11:25 AM, a review of facility-reported incident MD00213513 revealed that on 1/12/2025, Resident #53 reported that he/she fell on the floor and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #19) picked him/her and threw him/her back on the floor. The report also indicated that 2 Geriatric Nurse Assistants (GNA #26 and #27) assisted LPN #19. Registered Nurse Supervisor (RN #9) asked Resident #53 to describe the staff, he/she stated, don't play dumb, they're all Africans. He/she repeated this statement when he/she was interviewed by the local law enforcement. On 1/29/2025 at 9:15 AM, in an interview with Resident #53, he/she stated that he/she fell on the floor on January 12 and confirmed that LPN #19 along…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with staff it was determined the facility failed to provide services to maintain a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike environment. This was evident for 2 of 2 units in the facility and in the kitchen. The findings include: During observational rounds of the facility on 9/23/24: The surveyor observed on the 2nd floor at 10:15 AM- room [ROOM NUMBER] - A hand sink was located in a small alcove within the room on the wall to the left of the bathroom door. Three 4 inch by 4 inch (4x4) ceramic wall tiles, missing from the wall below and to the right of the sink, were stacked on the floor below the sink. A 1x1 hole was observed completely through the wallboard along the top of the rubber shoe molding, located between the bathroom door and the alcove. Numerous cracked floor tiles were observed throughout the room. The cracks and gaps in the seams between the tiles were black. The shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] - A wall panel covered the long shower wall and extended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately and appropriately identify a residents health status and representative in order to change a resident's code status. This was evident during the review of 1 of 3 (#16) residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for CPR (on the front page) and other life-sustaining treatments (on the back page). The medical orders are based on a patient's wishes about medical treatments. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 on [DATE] at 9:37 AM revealed diagnosis to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Resident #16, who was admitted back in 2022 was transferred to this facility with a MOLST documenting that s/he was full code according to the patients' health care agent as named in their advanced directive. According to this ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview; it was determined that the facility failed to protect resident (resident #9 and #28) from physical abuse from a facility staff member. This was evident for 2 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) Record review on 9/23/24 at 12:00 PM revealed resident #9 complained to the facility's administration that he/she received painful ADL care from GNA #15 on 3/7/24. The facility investigated the complaint from resident #9 and determined that GNA #15 failed to use a gait belt, an assistive device that is used to stabilize a physically impaired person during transfers including from bed to chair. The unsafe transfer caused resident #9 from his/her bed caused the resident to experience pain in the neck. Review of medical records after the incident revealed no evidence of psychosocial or physical pain from the improper transfer. Continued record review on 9/23/24 at 12:40 PM revealed the facility placed a corrective action for GNA #15 in the employee's personnel record on 3/8/24 which stated GNA #15 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to implement measures and reasonable care to prevent loss or theft of resident's belongings. This was evident for 1 (#24) of 41 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A complaint pertaining to Resident #24 was reviewed on 9/26/24 at 9:25 AM. The complainant indicated that he/she discovered that 3 bags of Resident #24's clothing were missing on 8/30/22. When he/she reported it to Staff #14 at the front desk, Staff #14 informed the complainant that she observed a nurse taking bags of clothing to her car on 8/28/22. The complaint indicated that the complainant reported it to administrative staff who retrieved 2 of the 3 bags on 9/2/22 and informed him/her they would reimburse him/her for the 3rd bag. The complaint indicated that the Administrator said he would look into the matter, but the complainant never heard anything more about it. The event was reported to the police by the complainant. During a telephone interview on 9/26/24 at 9:11 AM the complainant recalled the incident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of resident belongings to the State Agency. This was evident for 1 (#24) of 41 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A complaint pertaining to Resident #24 was reviewed on 9/26/24 at 9:25 AM. The complainant indicated that he/she discovered that 3 bags of Resident #24's clothing were missing on 8/30/22. When he/she reported it to Staff #14 at the front desk, Staff #14 informed the complainant that she observed a nurse taking bags of clothing to her car on 8/28/22. The complainant reported it to administrative staff who retrieved 2 of the 3 bags on 9/2/22 and informed him/her they would reimburse him/her for the 3rd bag. The complaint indicated that the Administrator said he would look into the matter, but the complainant never heard anything more about it. The event was reported to the police by the complainant. The state agency had no record that the facility filed a self-report regarding this alleged incident. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation after a reports of abuse and misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 3 (#28, #24 and #11) of 41 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of facility reported incident (MD 00183660) on 9/25/24 at 9:54 AM revealed resident #28 reported being hit by Agency GNA#16 on 9/20/22. Surveyor review of the facility investigation revealed the facility failed to interview other residents on the unit to determine if other residents experienced abusive treatment by facility staff including Agency GNA #16 and to ensure the residents felt safe in the facility. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/25/24 at 11:00 AM confirmed that the facility failed to interview other residents on resident #28's unit to determine if other residents experienced abusive treatment by facility staff including Agency GNA #16 and ensure the residents felt safe in the facility. 2) A complaint pertaining to Resident #24 was reviewed on 9/26/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility nursing staff failed to follow standards of practice by failing to report a resident's injury to a provider (resident #31). This was evident for 1 out of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Record review for resident #31 on 9/25/24 at 11:41 AM revealed NP #20 reported on 7/11/22 that LPN #19 failed to report the formation of a bruise on the resident's left knee. NP #20 discovered the left knee bruise when he/she assessed resident #31 on 7/11/22 at approximately 2:00 PM. Continued review of NP#20's complaint revealed the facility investigated the cause of resident #31's left knee bruise and determined that LPN#19 was aware of the left knee bruise on the morning of 7/11/22 but failed to report the injury to his/her supervisor or administration. Further review of resident #31's records revealed facility administration issued a teachable moment notice on LPN #19's personnel record on 7/12/22 . The facility required LPN#19 to be re-educated on facility policy on reporting injuries to supervision.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care to a resident that is dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). This was evident during the review of a complaint for 1 of 4 (#35 ) residents related to quality of care. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 on 9/30/24 at 8:05 AM revealed diagnosis which includes cellulitis and lymphedema in the bilateral lower extremities causing bed bound status. Resident #35, reported in 2022 concerns related to lack of care provided on the weekends of 3/5-3/7/22 and 3/11-3/14/22. A review of the bowel and bladder continence record for the month of March 2022 revealed no documentation on any of the 3 shifts that the resident had either a bowel or bladder movement on 3/6, 3/7, 3/11, 3/13 and 3/14. Surveyor met with Resident #35 on 9/30/24. Though care has improved, s/he verbalized and reiterated about the lack of care and treatment that was provided from the time reported in the complaint for the weekends in March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents received proper foot care and treatment. This was evident for 1 (#34) of 41 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A complaint regarding the care and services provided to resident #34 was reviewed on 10/1/24 at 11:31 AM. The complaint indicated the resident experienced pain as they attempted to put shoes onto his/her feet in preparation for discharge and that upon closer look, Resident #34's toenails were long, and his/her feet and nails did not appear to have been adequately cared for by the facility. A review of Resident #34's medical record was conducted at that time and revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 5/6/22. His/Her diagnoses included but were not limited to Diabetes Mellitus, and Dementia. A physician's order was written on 10/4/21 for consults including Podiatry. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a discharge summary on the medical record. This was evident for 1 of 3 (#20) residents reviewed for discharges during a complaint survey. The findings include: During the review of the medical record for Resident #20 on 9/24/24 regarding a complaint related to timely discharge, it was noted that there was no physician discharge summary on the chart. The summary was requested on 9/24/24 at 1:35 PM. On 9/25/24 at 8:08 AM a physician discharge summary was provided to the survey team. Review of the summary noted that it was dated for 9/24/24 and stated that the resident was seen 'TODAY' in all capital letters in his/her room. However, according to record review on 9/24/24 and again on 9/25/24 at 8:12 AM, Resident #20 left the facility against medical advice on 11/19/22 and has not returned. This concern was reviewed with the regional nurse on 9/25/24 at 8:18 AM. The attending physician was interviewed on 10/1/24 at 12:10 PM. She stated that she was asked by the Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure a functioning call system to allow residents to call for staff assistance in each toilet and bathing facility. This was evident for 2 of 4 resident bathrooms observed. The findings include: A tour of the facility was conducted on 9/24/24 at 10:00AM. 1) Observation of the bathroom located between and shared by the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 217 revealed a call bell activation box on the wall in the shower approximately 6 feet above the floor. A short red cord was attached to the call bell activation switch. The end of the cord was located approximately 5 feet above the floor and could not be reached by a resident sitting/lying on the shower floor or seated on a shower chair. 2) The bathroom located between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had call bell activation switches located on the walls to the left and right of the toilet. The activation switch on the wall to the left of the toilet was in the up (off) position, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents. The findings include: On 9/23/24 at approximately 10:00 AM, the survey team observed evidence of mouse droppings and cockroach activity on the 1st and 2nd floors of the facility. The survey team observed pest activity in resident rooms on 9/24/24 - 9/26/24 on the 1st and 2nd floors of the facility during observation rounds and interviews with residents in their rooms. On 9/24/24 at 1:02 PM, the survey team informed the Assistant Executive Director of concerns of pest activity throughout the facility. The survey team also requested the facility's pest activity reporting documents to determine if the facility made attempts to provide a pest-free environment. On 9/24/24 at 1:15 PM, the survey team interviewed the Maintenance Director, Maintenance Assistant and the Assistant Executive Assistant regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-03 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of the residents' clinical records, a review of the facility's policy and procedures related to smoking, observations of residents and staff practices, and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement their smoking policy. This finding was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #10, #21, #69). The findings include: On 01-30-2020 a review of the facility's current smoking policy and procedure revealed that the intent of the policy was to provide a safe smoking area for residents/patients that request to smoke and are capable of safe smoking behaviors either independently or with supervision. The procedures include the following: assessment, observation and the designation of the resident either being independent or supervised smoker. This designation will be made by the interdisciplinary team for each resident who requests to smoke and will be documented in the medical record system. These assessments will be done or re-evaluated at the time of the resident's admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and interview with a resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct timely quarterly care plan conferences with 1 of 22 residents selected for review during the survey (Resident #72). The findings include: On 01-29-2020 at 1:30 PM, surveyor interview with Resident #72 revealed that he/she had not participated in care plan meetings for some time. In addition, even though the resident is his/her responsible party, the resident's spouse would participate occasionally in the meeting. On 01-30-2020 around 1:00 PM, surveyor review of the clinical record revealed documentation of a quarterly care plan meeting for Resident #72, conducted in August 2019. There was no evidence that any further interdisciplinary quarterly care plan meetings, that included resident #72, had been completed after August 2019 as required. On 01-30-2020 at 2:10 PM, an interview with the Director of Social Work revealed not conducting care planning conferences with Resident#72 was an oversite. On 01-30-2020 at 4:30 PM, surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of residents' clinical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure nursing standards of practice for 2 of 22 residents selected for review during the survey. This finding was evident for 2 of 22 residents selected during the survey (Residents #20 and #245). The findings include: 1. On 01-31-2020 a review of the clinical record for Resident #20 revealed that on 01-23-2020 the facility's wound consultant documented that the resident had a stage 2 pressure sore on the sacral area. A stage 2 pressure sore is when the skin usually breaks open, wears away, or forms an ulcer, which is usually tender and painful. The sore expands into deeper layers of the skin. It can look like a scrape (abrasion) or a shallow crater in the skin. Further review of the wound consultant's documentation revealed that the treatment plan for the wound was to apply Leptospermum honey (Medi Honey) and a dry protective dressing once daily for 23 days. On 01-31-2020 a review of Resident #20's Skin/Wound documentation, 01-23-2020 by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-03 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, interview of the resident's representative and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #47 received outside services to manage a health condition for 1 of 22 residents selected for review during the survey (Resident #47). The findings include: On 01-29-2020 at 10:30 AM, an interview with Resident #47's representative revealed that the resident had an appointment scheduled with the oncologist (a medical professional who deals with treatment of cancer) on 01-02-2020. As of 01-29-2020, Resident #47 had not visited the Oncologist, and the facility had not communicated with the resident's representative about the Oncology appointment. On 01-29-2020 a review of Resident #47's clinical record revealed the resident was seen an Oncologist on 12-19-2019, with the recommendation for a follow up appointment on 01-02-2020. There was no documented evidence in Resident #47 attended this follow up appointment. On 01-30-2020 at 11:15 AM, an interview with the Upper Level Unit Manager revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of the clinical record and interview with Hospice staff and the facility's staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure complete and accessible documentation in the clinical records for 2 of 22 residents selected for review during the survey (Residents #20 and #79). 1. On 02-03-2020 the review of Resident #20's clinical record revealed the resident receives nursing and supportive services from a community Hospice agency. Further review of the record revealed documentation by Hospice of monthly summaries for the resident. On 02-03-2020 at 1:00 PM an interview with the Director of Nursing revealed that a Hospice nurse makes weekly visits to the facility, conducts assessments and collaborates with the nursing staff on Resident #20's care. On 02-03-2020 at 3:15 PM interview with Hospice RN #7 and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that his/her weekly visits notes provides the documentation of the collaboration between Hospice RN #7 and the facility's nurses at each visit. Hospice RN #7 further confirmed that this information was not previously…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical records and interview of a court appointed guardian and the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise an individual's care plan after the comprehensive assessment was completed. In addition, the facility staff failed to ensure that an individual participated in his/her own care plan meeting. This finding was evident for 4 of 25 residents selected for review during the survey (#13, #43, #9 and #49). The findings include: 1. On 03-28-19, review of resident #13's clinical record revealed that the resident had a court appointed guardian of person. In January 2019, a quarterly MDS assessment was completed. On 01-23-19, the court appointed guardian of person participated in the care plan meeting. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is an assessment tool to reflect an individual's physical and functional status. Further review of the resident's current care plan related to pain management, hypertension, paranoid schizophrenia and glaucoma revealed that the facility staff would administer medications as ordered and monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observations, record review and interviews with facility staff and resident's representatives, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident's representatives regarding the discontinuation of a treatment for the prevention of elopement. This was evident for 1 of 1 (#52) residents selected for the notification of changes review during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 03-27-19 at 09:00 AM, review of resident #52's record revealed a physician's order, dated 01-17-19, to discontinue the wander guard (a sensor on a band used as an elopement prevention device). However, further review revealed that no evidence of notification to the resident's representative for the discontinuation of the wander guard. On 03-27-19 at 01:40 PM, interview with resident #52's representative revealed that he/she was not informed by the facility staff of the physician order to discontinue the resident's wander guard. On 03-27-19 02:00 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, interview with resident and facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the resident or the representative in writing when the resident was sent to the hospital. This finding was evident in 1(#36) of 2 residents selected for the hospitalization review during the survey. The findings include: On 03-26-19 at 09:30 AM, surveyor interview with resident #36 revealed he/she was sent to the hospital a couple of months ago. Surveyor review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order to transfer resident #36 to the hospital on [DATE] for further evaluation and treatment. Surveyor review of nurse's note written on 12-21-18 at 2:33 PM, revealed the resident's representative was called and made aware of the transfer. However, there was no evidence that a written notification of transfer was provided to resident #45 or his/her representative when the resident was transferred to the hospital. On 03-27-18 at 11:10 AM, the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical records and interview of the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to meet the standard of nursing practice of documentation after a treatment was done. This finding was evident for 2 (#13,#58) of 25 residents selected for standard of practice review. The findings include: 1. On 03-27-19, review of resident #13's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that the nursing staff signed off that a blood sugar test was done once a week on 01-13-19, 01-21-19, 01-28-19, 02-25-19, 03-11-19 and 03-25-19 for diabetic management. However, there was no evidence that the nursing staff recorded the blood sugar results on the above dates. A blood sugar test is to determine how much glucose (sugar) is in a blood sample. On 03-27-19 at 2:30 PM, interview of the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information. As Code of Maryland Regulations 10.27.10.03D (3), Collection of data and reporting of problems that arise in the carrying out of the nursing plan. 2. On 03-27-19, surveyor observation of medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observations, review of resident records, and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow a physician's order. This was evident for 3 of 25 (#1, #52, #7 and #68) residents selected for this survey. The findings include: 1. On 03-25-19 1:45 PM Observed resident #52 with a wander guard (a sensor on a band used as an elopement prevention device) on his/her left wrist. On 03-27-19 at 9:00 AM review of resident #52's record revealed a physician order dated 01-17-19 to discontinue the wander guard. However, the wander guard was not discontinued as ordered. On 03-27-19 at 2:00 PM interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information. 2. On 03-26-19 at 4:00 PM surveyor observation of medication cart #1 on the lower level unit with staff #4 a medication package for resident #1 that was scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM on 03-26-19 remained in the designated section for resident #1's scheduled medications. On 03-26-19 at 4:05 PM record review of resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of employee records and facility staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for nurses aides. This was evident for 1 of 5 (#1) nurse aides selected for this survey. The findings include: 1. On 03-29-19 at 10:00 AM, surveyor review of GNA #1's employee record revealed that the GNA was hired 03-27-17 and there was no documentation that he/she received a yearly performance review by the facility. On 03-29-19 1:00 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no new information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on surveyor observation and facility staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 1 of 4 (#1) medication storage carts selected for medication storage inspection during the survey. The findings include: 1. On 03-26-19 at 4:00 PM, surveyor observed a multiple use bottle of 1% Xylocaine (local anesthetic medication used to numb nerve signals in the body) opened and unlabeled. On 03-26-19 at 4:10 PM, interview with the lower level unit manager revealed no additional information. On 03-26-19 at 4:30 PM, interview with the Director of Nursing revealed no additional information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' call lights were functional. This finding was identified in 2 of 10 bathrooms located on the upper level unit. The findings include: On 03-25-19 at 9:15 AM, surveyor tour of the ground floor unit of the facility revealed that room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom call light system was nonfunctional. In addition, the cord/string used to trigger the emergency call system was not available. Additional observation of the general bathroom on the upper level unit revealed no cord or string for the emergency call system in the shower room. On 03-25-19 at 2:10 PM, surveyor interview with the maintenance director and the director of nursing revealed no new information. Following surveyor intervention on 03-25-19, the call system in room [ROOM NUMBER] and the general shower room on the upper level unit were restored.
- No harm found · B2025-02-04 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure waste in the outdoor garbage storage area was disposed of properly. This was evident for 1 of 1 random observation made of the facility's outdoor refuse area during the annual survey. The findings include: During a tour of the facility's outdoor refuse area on 01/27/2025 at 10:05 AM, the Surveyor and District Manager (DM) observed debris scattered around the dumpster area. The debris included several pairs of used medical gloves on the ground and clear plastic bags. In an interview conducted on 01/27/2025 at 10:07 AM, the District Manager confirmed that the expectation for trash disposal was that all trash is to be contained inside of the dumpster and stated that scattered debris and all other trash would be disposed of immediately.
- No harm found · C2020-02-03 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the administrative records, facility's policies and procedure and interview with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the requirements for the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings were met. This finding was identified during the QAA review. The findings include: On 02-03-2020 a review of the facility's QAA committee meeting attendance sign-in sheets, dated 05-14-2019, revealed a summary of the meeting. There was no evidence of a sign-in sheet to determine if facility met the minimum standard for required staff participation in the committee and the meeting. On 02-03-2020 further review of administrative records revealed no evidence that the QAA committee met at least quarterly between 5-14-2019 and 10-22-2019. On 02-03-2020 a review of the facility's QAA committee sign-in sheet, 12-31-2019, revealed no documented evidence that the facility's medical director or his/her designee was in attendance as required. Surveyor interview on 02-03-2020 at 6:30 PM with the facility administrator revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical record, review of the Beneficiary Protection Notifications and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide 1 of 1 resident selected for the Beneficiary Protection Notification review with the NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) and SNFABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) in a timely manner (Resident #60). The findings include: A Medicare health provider must give an advance, completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to enrollees receiving skilled nursing, home health (including psychiatric home health), or comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility services, no later than two days before the termination of services. The SNFABN provides information to the beneficiary in order to decide whether or not to get the care that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. On 01-30-2020 surveyor review of the clinical record for Resident #30 revealed that 01-01-2020 would be the resident's last effective date of Medicare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-03-29 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor review of the clinical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to convey within 30 days upon the death of a resident the final personal funds to the resident's estate. This finding was evident in 1 (#189) of 4 residents selected for beneficiary protection notification review during the survey. The findings include: On 03-29-19 at 2 PM, surveyor review of the facility trial balance (a statement of all debits and credits in a double-entry account book, with any disagreement indicating an error) during a beneficiary protection notification record review revealed that resident #189 died on [DATE]. However, review of resident #189's account with the facility revealed that resident #189 still had 74.03 dollars with the facility although he/she had died in 2017. The facility failed to convey resident #189's remaining funds to his/her estate or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate in accordance with state law. On 03-29-19 at 2:15 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on surveyor review of the clinical records and interview of the facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to conduct accurate documentation regarding elopement risk and the effectiveness of pain management. This finding was evident for 3 of 25 residents selected for assessment review.(#21, #7 & #68) The findings include: 1. On 03-25-19 at 1 PM and 03-26-19 at 10 AM, surveyor observation revealed resident #21 was alert and oriented to name only. The resident self-propelled while he/she was in a wheelchair. A wanderguard bracelet was noted on his/her left wrist. The wanderguard is an alarm system that is used in wandering or elopement management. The system usually involves some type of antenna system connected to a controller and a door contact switch. Residents who are at risk for elopement wear a wrist or ankle transmitter, and when the transmitter comes in contact close to the door that is protected by this type of system, the antenna signals out the transmitter of the resident. On 03-27-19, review of the clinical record revealed resident #21 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$61,269 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $12,740 — penalty dated 2026-03-20
- $48,529 — penalty dated 2025-02-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215065. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.