Copper Ridge Nursing And Assisted Living Center
710 Obrecht Road, Sykesville, MD 21784 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (410) 795-8808 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,113 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 47.3% | 20.4% | 15.4% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 40.0% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 53.9% | 22.2% | 16.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.8% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.0% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.9% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.8% | 13.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 22.5% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.2% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.5% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.49 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.67 | 1.20 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 220 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.7%CMS range 33.0–44.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.8%CMS range 9.6–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 69.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.1–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.32 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 62.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, review of facility investigations and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately supervise Resident #34 from behaviors that subjected him/her to the risk of serious injuries. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #34) of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that the concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy, and the facility was notified in writing of this determination at 2 PM on 6/17/26. The findings include:On 6/17/26 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #2686663 pertaining to an injury of unknown origin noted on Resident #34. The incident was reported to OHCQ on 12/05/25. On review of the progress notes from the date of the discovery of the injury of unknown origin, 11/30/25, it was noted that Resident #34, remains alert with episodes of confusion. Was seen walking around the unit in circles. Was put to bed x2, was not effective. Around 7:40 pm, the resident was seen with a hematoma to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility and medical records and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from eloping from the facility. This was evident for 1 (#7) of 2 residents reviewed for accidents.The findings include:Review of Resident #7's medical record on 12/4/25 at 1:38 PM revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition with behavioral disturbance, cognitive communication deficit and other sequelae of cerebral infarction. Resident #7 ambulated independently and without the use of assistive devices. The resident had 2 physician certificates indicating s/he lacked capacity to make medical decisions due to Cognitive Impairment. An initial elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated s/he was not an elopement risk. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment is a tool used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to to provide necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for dependent Residents timely. This was evident for 2 (Resident #74 & #68) of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living during the annual survey.The findings include:Activities of daily living (ADL) are tasks we do to stay alive and well, and include eating, going to the bathroom, bathing, transferring etc.1) On 06/16/2026 at approximately 8:20 AM the surveyor observed that Resident #74 call light was on. LPN #20 was in the hallway passing medication. The surveyor waited 20 minutes to see if anyone would respond to the call light, but no one did. The surveyor went into the resident's room to see if they were ok. Resident #74 said it's been 24 minutes since she put on their call light and no one had shown up and s/he wanted to go to the bathroom and be cleaned up. The surveyor told the resident that she would go look for their aide. The surveyor approached LPN #20 and told her the resident needed help and asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications according to procedures that ensure accurate dispensing and ensure medications were administered to a resident as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #31) out 4 residents observed for medication administration and 1 (Resident #68) out of 2 complaints related to medication administration. The findings include: 1) On 6/18/26 at 7:34 AM, the surveyor observed RN #5 prepare medications for Resident #31. RN #5 asked Resident # 31 if he/she was having pain before administering the medications. Resident #31 acknowledged he/she was having pain and RN #5 informed Resident #31 that she would give him/her pain medication. Next RN #5 obtained Resident #31's as needed tramadol(pain medication) from the locked controlled substance box and signed the medication out on the controlled log book. RN #5 added the medication to Resident #31's morning medication and administered them to the resident. On 6/18/26 at 9:37 AM, the surveyor conducted a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility files and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure all direct care staff received mandatory training for Effective Communication.This was evident for 4 (#8, #9, #10, and #11) of 4 direct care staff reviewed for Training Requirements during the extended survey.The findings include:Six employee files were reviewed for education and training on 12/11/25 at 9:30 AM. The files for Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) Staff #8, #9 and #10 and Staff #11 a Registered Nurse (RN) failed to reveal that they received mandatory training for Effective Communication.On 12/11/25 at approximately 11:30 AM, Staff #12 Human Resources (HR) Director was made aware of the above findings. Despite several attempts she was unable to produce evidence that Effective Communication education was provided to the above staff members as required.On 12/11/25 at 11:57 AM, Staff #6 the Corporate Nurse was made aware of these findings. After attempting to obtain the records and speaking with Staff #12, she informed the surveyor that the education records were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility files and interview with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure all staff received mandatory training on the elements and goals of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.This was evident for 4 (#8, #10, #3 and #4) of 6 staff reviewed for Training Requirements during the extended survey.The findings include:Six employee files were reviewed for education and training on 12/11/25 at 9:30 AM. The files for Staff #8 and #10 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA's), Staff #3 a Dietary Aide and Staff #4 a [NAME] failed to reveal they received the mandatory training on the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program.Staff #12, the Human Resources (HR) Director, was made aware of the above findings on 12/11/25 at approximately 11:30 AM. Despite several attempts she was unable to produce evidence that the training was provided as required. Staff #6 the Corporate Nurse was made aware of these findings at 11:57 AM on 12/11/25. She spoke with Staff #12 and attempted to locate the education records. However, she informed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. This was evident for 2 (#3, #1) of 3 residents reviewed for an injury of unknown source and 1 (#2) of 1 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property.The findings include:On 12/4/25 at approximately 12:15 PM, a review of facility reported incident, 263516, documented that on 10/5/25 at 6:15 AM, Resident #3 was observed to have bruising and swelling of his/her left eye that was an injury of unknown origin.The facility's investigation documented that staff became aware of the incident on 10/5/25 at 6:15 AM. Further review of the facility's documentation revealed an email confirmation that documented the facility's initial self-report was sent to the State Agency on 10/5/25 at 11:51 AM.The facility failed to report the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews at least every 12 months. This was found to be evident for 4 (#8, #13, #14, #15) of 4 GNA employee files reviewed.The findings include:Performance appraisals are to be completed at least every 12 months to identify in-service education needed to address competencies of the geriatric nursing assistants. During a complaint survey, a review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant personnel files failed to reveal evidence of yearly evaluations. On 12/11/25 at 1:18 PM the surveyor requested the yearly performance reviews for 4 GNAs (#8, #13, #14, #15).On 12/11/25 at 2:20 PM, Staff #12, Human Resources reported to surveyor that s/he was unable to find any GNA performance reviews.On 12/11/25 at approximately 6:00 PM, the above concerns were discussed with Staff #6, Corporate Registered Nurse (RN). The Corporate RN acknowledged the concerns at that time and confirmed there was no evidence to indicate annual performance reviews of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility files and interviews with staff it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure all staff received mandatory training for the Infection Control program. This was evident for 1 (#4) of 6 staff reviewed Training Requirements during the extended survey.The findings include:Employee files for 6 facility staff were reviewed for education and training on 12/11/25 at 9:30 AM. No documentation was found to indicate that Staff #4 a [NAME] received training for the facility's Infection Control program as required. Staff #12, the Human Resources (HR) Director, was made aware of the above findings on 12/11/25 at approximately 11:30 AM. Despite several attempts she was unable to produce evidence that the training was provided to Staff #4.Staff #6 the Corporate Nurse was made aware of these findings at 11:57 AM on 12/11/25. She indicated that she spoke with Staff #12 and attempted to locate the records herself. However, the education records were not systematically maintained, and she was unable to determine if and when the education was provided.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct care plan meetings of the interdisciplinary team for residents at the time of the quarterly revision of their care plan. This was evident for 4 (Resident #7, #12, #29, and #63) out of 6 residents reviewed for care plans during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Care plans are developed for residents to guide the care that residents receive in the facility. They are required to be developed within 7 days of completion of a resident's admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least every quarter (or more often as needed). The facility is required to have care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team including: the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative (as practicable). 1) During a review of Resident #12's medical record on 5/29/25, at 9:49 AM, it was revealed that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure: 1) a psychotropic medication prescribed as needed (PRN), had an end date that was limited to 14 days, and 2) residents were free from unnecessary medications. This was evident for 2 (Residents # 29, #22) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) defines a psychotropic medication in the regulations at §483.45(c)(3), as any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior (CMS, 2023). These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories: anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, and hypnotic medications. These medications can have serious potential risks, including side effects, drug interactions, and the possibility of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (a rare but potentially life-threatening condition) or tardive dyskinesia (a movement disorder that can develop if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy to the resident/resident representative when the resident was transferred to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 6/2/25 at 2:55 PM a review of Resident #6's medical record was conducted and revealed that the resident was transferred from the facility to a hospital on 5/19/25. Further review of the medical record failed to produce evidence that the resident was given written notice of the bed hold policy. On 6/2/25 at 3:13 PM the surveyor requested evidence that Resident #6 was provided with written notice of the bed hold policy. On 6/3/25 at 8:33 AM the NHA provided documentation to the surveyor. Review of the documentation revealed a progress note dated 6/2/25 that noted late entry and stated the resident and family were notified by the nurse and UM that s/he would be sent to the ER (emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with summaries of their baseline care plans including a list of their medications. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 30 residents reviewed during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A baseline care plan (BLCP) must be completed within 48 hours of a resident's admission to the facility and include the initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, and social services. A summary of the BLCP and medication list must be given to each resident and/or his/her representative. Completion and implementation of the BLCP is intended to promote continuity of care and communication among staff, increase resident safety, and safeguard against adverse events (undesirable outcomes) that can occur right after admission. On 5/29/25 at 12:01PM in an interview with the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for a resident. This was evident for 2 (Residents #6 and #22) out of 30 residents reviewed during the facility's recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) The surveyor reviewed Resident #6's medical record on 5/28/25 at 1:20 PM. The review revealed the resident had weight loss from 11/1/24 - 12/6/24. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was ordered weekly weights one time a day every Sunday for 4 weeks on 12/6/24. Per the order, the first weight should have been obtained on 12/8/24; however, there was no weight observed in the medical record for this date. Furthermore, there was no weight obtained on 12/22/24. Only half, 2 out of 4 weights were obtained for this order. The other 2 weights from the order were obtained but were not obtained on Sunday as ordered. Additionally, Resident #6 was ordered weekly weights one time a day every Sunday for 4 weeks on 2/4/25. The 4th weight from that order should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure drug records were maintained in a manner that allowed for reconciliation of dispensed and administered medication. This was evident for 2 (Resident #29 and #165) out of 3 residents reviewed for administration of controlled medication during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: A controlled substance is a drug or chemical regulated by a government due to its potential for abuse, harm, or psychoactive effects. These substances are often classified into different schedules (or categories) based on their potential for abuse and accepted medical uses, including both illicitly used drugs and prescription medications designated by law. A controlled medication utilization record (known as a count sheet) is a form to record controlled medication dispense. It documents the details for each use of any controlled substance amount removed from its original containers, including date, time, the dose given, the signature of the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to document/respond to recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/29/2025, at 9:16 AM, she explained the procedures for obtaining medication orders for residents. She stated, When we get a new admission, the admitting nurse enters the medications. Supervisors review the medications, and the pharmacist reviews them within 2-4 hours. A report is then sent through their website. If drug interactions are noted, they are sent via email to the provider and DON. Then, I print and give them to the provider for review and sign-off. I hand it to the provider, and the provider reviews it. They agree, disagree, or note 'other,' then sign/date and provide a rationale for disagreement. The surveyor asked how the facility staff documented these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to ensure medications were administered or withheld according to physician's orders. This was evident for 2 (Resident #3 and #28) out of 30 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: 1) A review of Resident #3's clinical record on 6/4/25 revealed the resident's primary physician ordered Metoprolol (cardiac medication) 50 mg (milligrams) to be administered twice a day and to hold for a systolic blood pressure (top number) of less than 110 or a heart rate less than 60. A review of the resident's medication administration record (MAR) on 5/14/25 revealed the nursing staff took the resident's blood pressure, and it was 109/76 which meant the medication was to be held but the nurse administered the medication. On 5/24/25, the nursing staff did not take the resident's blood pressure in the morning but still administered the medication despite the physician having ordered parameters that instructed the nurse whether to hold the medication. Further review of the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) out of 30 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: Resident #3 was interviewed on 5/28/25 at 9:11 AM. The resident was asked if they have been seen by a dentist since admission and if they are having any dental issues such as a suspected cavity, tooth pain, or a cracked tooth. The resident said they have never been to a dentist, and they have issues with their teeth and would like someone to take care of it. A review of Resident #3's clinical revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE] and has never been seen by a dentist. The Director of Nursing was interviewed on 06/04/25 at 08:45 AM. This surveyor had requested all dental consults since Admission. She informed the surveyor that there were no dental consults in the clinical records because the resident did not have any problems.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to discard protein drinks past their use by date. This was evident for 2 out of 3 unit-based kitchens observed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During the tour of the kitchen on the Eastern Shore nursing unit on 6/4/25 at 10:08 AM two 4-ounce cartons of vanilla reduced sugar Mighty Shake (a fortified nutritional shake) were observed in the refrigerator. The cartons had a use by date of 5/30/25. Staff #21 was shown the shakes, and she said, I'll take care of it. She then appeared to put them back in the refrigerator. During the tour of the kitchen on the Baltimore nursing unit that served the lower numbered rooms on 6/4/25 at 10:14 AM one 4-ounce carton of vanilla reduced sugar Mighty Shake (a fortified nutritional shake) was observed in the refrigerator. The carton had a use by date of 5/30/25. Staff #22 was shown the shake, and he immediately threw it out. The Dietary Manager (Staff #20) was interviewed on 6/4/25 at 2:07 PM. This surveyor informed her that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to adequately monitor and track residents receiving antibiotics. This deficiency was evident for 2 (Resident #22 and #166) out of 4 residents reviewed for antibiotic use and the facility's antibiotic stewardship program during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Background on Antibiotic Stewardship: Effective antibiotic stewardship requires a facility to develop and implement robust policies, procedures, or protocols to ensure residents needing antibiotics are treated appropriately. This is crucial for minimizing the risk of adverse drug reactions, preventing unnecessary antibiotic administration, and mitigating the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms. A facility-wide process for monitoring antibiotic use is essential, with results and feedback consistently reported to nursing staff and prescribing clinicians. On 6/02/2025, at 12:04 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), who also serves as the Infection Control Preventionist, she stated that the facility had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to adequately screen residents for eligibility and document their pneumococcal and influenza (Flu) vaccination status. This deficiency was evident for 2 (Resident #29 and #54) out of 5 residents whose immunization records were reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Pneumococcal Vaccine: The pneumococcal vaccine helps prevent pneumococcal disease, an illness caused by Streptococcus pneumonia bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends this vaccine for individuals aged 65 years or older, and for adults aged 19 through 64 with certain medical conditions or risk factors. Influenza (Flu) Vaccine: Flu is a contagious respiratory disease that spreads annually, typically between October and May. While anyone can contract the flu, it poses a greater risk to certain populations, including infants and young children, individuals 65 years and older, pregnant individuals, and those with specific health conditions or weakened immune systems. Influenza…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff employee file review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain document related to residents' and staff' COVID-19 vaccination status. This was evident for 2 (Resident #3 and #54) out of 5 residents, and 1 (Staff #16) out of 5 staff reviewed for COVID vaccination records during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1a) On 6/2/2025 at 10:00 AM, a review of 5 randomly selected resident immunization records revealed that Resident #54, admitted in May 2025, did not have his/her COVID-19 vaccination status in their medical chart. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/2/2025 at 1:19 PM, the DON stated that the facility monitored resident immunization status through ImmuNet (Maryland's immunization information system), hospital records, and direct communication with residents or their family members. When questioned about Resident #54's COVID-19 vaccination status, the DON responded, I will look more. Subsequent review of Resident #54's medical record progress note on 6/5/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents were adequately equipped with the ability to call for assistance, if needed, through a communication system. This was evident for 1 (Resident #58) out of 4 resident rooms assessed for call light accessibility during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 5/28/25 at 8:47 AM, during the initial screening phase of the survey process, it was observed that Resident #58's call bell was on the floor in the resident's room and unreachable for the resident when laying in bed. On 6/3/25 at 10:26 AM, an observation of Resident #58's room revealed that the resident's call bell remained out of reach. The call bell was wedged under the resident's wardrobe. In an interview with Certified Medication Aide (CMA #25), she was made aware of Resident #58's call bell location. CMA #25 attempted to remove the call bell from the floor; however, she stated that she was unable to remove the wedged call bell, but would notify maintenance to address the concern. On 6/5/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility investigative materials, resident medical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free of verbal abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #33) out of 4 residents reviewed for abuse during this recertification/complaint survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident prior to the start of this survey. The facility's plan and actions were verified during this survey, leading to a determination of past noncompliance, with a compliance date of 6/12/2024. The findings include: BIMS: Brief Interview for Mental Status score is a measure of cognitive function in individuals, typically used in long-term care facilities. It assesses orientation, recall, and the ability to perform simple tasks. The higher the score, the better the cognitive performance, with scores ranging from 0 to 15. Facility Reported Incident #MD00205893 was reviewed on 6/02/2025 at 9:25 AM. The facility's investigation revealed that on 5/16/2024, Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of the facility's investigation, the facility reported incident, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse. This was evident for 3 (#115 ,#116 #117) out of 9 residents selected for abuse review during the annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Review of facility reported incident MD00139229 on 09/15/2021 revealed an allegation that Resident #115 was verbally abused by staff member #30 on 04/09/2019 at 7:15 AM. The facility investigation indicated that Resident #115 was voicing concerns about staff member #30's care during the night shift. The facility investigation revealed documentation that staff member #30 overheard Resident #115 voicing his/her concerns to the day shift charge nurse that staff member #30 would not honor his/her request to get up out of bed. It was at this time that witnesses heard staff member #30 call Resident #115 a liar. In an interview on 09/20/2021 at 8:48 AM, staff member #14 stated that Resident #115 came to the nurses' station on the morning of 04/09/2019 and told…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the medical record, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to 1) develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident (#26) receiving an antidepressant medication, and 2) develop a plan of care for pain management that had included non-pharmacological interventions. This is evident for 2 (Resident #26, #263) of 46 resident's selected for investigative review in the annual survey. The findings include: A care plan is a written guideline of care based on the individual resident's needs developed by an interdisciplinary team which includes nursing, rehabilitation staff, and dietary that communicate to other health care professionals. A written care plan decreases the risk of incomplete, incorrect, or inaccurate care. A review of resident #26's medical record on 9/16//21 at 10 am revealed a physician order to administer Escitalopram Oxalate 20 mg (milligrams) by mouth once time a day for depression. Continued review of the medical record failed to review a care plan for the antidepressant medication. On 9/16/21 at 11:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-22 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of daily staffing records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nursing aides per shift and failed to have the staff data requirements available in an accurate, clear and readable format. It was identified that the facility did not have staffing information readily available in a readable format for residents and visitors for the survey. The findings include. During observations on 09/13, 09/14, and 09/15/2021, the nurse surveyor did not observe the Federal requirements related to the posting of staff in the facility. The total number of and actual hours worked by categories of Registered nurses, Licensed practical nurses, and Certified nursing aides per shift was not observed in any part of the facility. An interview was conducted with the facility Administrator and the assistant director of nurses (ADON) on 09/21/2021 at 2:15 PM during the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task review. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-22 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility records and an interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to revise and document an accurate up-to-date facility-wide assessment. This was evident during review of the sufficient and competent nurse staffing task of the annual survey. This has the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: A facility-wide assessment is conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is to include the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. A copy of the Facility Assessment was requested at the initiation of the survey on 09/13/21. Review of the Facility assessment on 09/14/21, revealed that the date of assessment or update was documented as September 2021. The initial creation of the Facility Assessment Tool dated August 2020 corresponded to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it had been determined that the facility had not implemented infection control practices to prevent the spread of COVID 19 as evidenced by facility staff to wear mask that covered their mouth and nose at all time while in resident care area. The findings include: Consistent with the 4/2/2020 CMS guidance, on 4/27/2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published updated guidance which stated, In general, fully vaccinated HCP (health care provider) should continue to wear source control while at work. However, fully vaccinated HCP could dine and socialize together in break rooms and conduct in-person meetings without source control or physical distancing. On 5/4/2021 The Maryland Department of Health (MDH) Secretary issued an amended Directive and Order Regarding Nursing Home Matters. The 5/4/21 Directive and Order, finding it necessary for the prevention and control of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2 or 2019-NCoV or COVID-19), and for the protection of the health and safety of patients, staff, and other individuals in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation rounds, it was determined the facility failed to maintain dignity for a resident when a staff member wrote the date and time on a pain patch after applying it. This was evident for 1 (#21) of 46 sampled residents. The findings included: During observation rounds on 9/20/21 at 10 am, LPN staff # 29 was observed applying a Lidoderm Patch to resident #21's right upper chest. After placing the patch to the upper chest, LPN staff #29 wrote the date and time applied on the patch. This surveyor asked staff #29, if this was his/her normal practice. S/he stated the patch should have been timed and dated before applying it. The DON (Director of Nursing) was made aware of the findings on 9/20/21 at 10:30 am.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that residents were able to exercise their right of self-determination, as evidenced by denying a resident a food preference due to the resident's diagnosis. This was evident for 1 (#19) of 43 residents reviewed. The findings include: An interview with Resident #19 on 9/14/21 at 11:54 AM, revealed that Resident #19 had made several request for regular sugar for his/her coffee but had been denied this request due to his/her diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (a long-lasting condition in which the body doesn't regulate the sugars in the blood in order to get the sugar to the cells for energy). Resident #19 reported that he/she was aware that the artificial sweeteners would be a better choice, however, coffee tasted better when Resident #19 used regular sugar. During a record review for Resident #19 on 9/17/21 at 1:24 PM, it was revealed that Resident #19 had a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes. A review of the physician's orders revealed that Resident #19 was ordered a carbohydrate controlled diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of administrative documents and staff interview, it was determined that a facility staff member failed to 1) report an allegation of physical abuse immediately to the facility administrator and initiate an investigation into the allegation of abuse and 2) report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency within a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (Resident #115, #262) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) Review of facility reported incident MD00139229 on 09/15/2021 revealed an allegation that Resident #115 was verbally abused by staff member #30 on 04/09/2019 at 7:15 AM. In an interview on 09/20/2021 at 8:48 AM, staff member #14 stated that Resident #115 came to the nurses' station on the morning of 04/09/2019 and began telling staff member #44 that staff member #30 would not honor his/her request to assist them out of bed. At this time, staff member #14 heard staff member #30 call Resident #115 a liar. The facility investigation indicated that, prior to being admitted to the facility, Resident #115…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) give residents a list of their admission medications with a copy of their baseline care plans, and 2) develop and implement baseline care plans and 2) provide a summary of the baseline care plan to newly admitted residents. This was evident for 5 (#21, #26, #51, #261, #262) of 46 residents reviewed during the investigation phase of the survey. The baseline care plan is given to residents within 48 hours of their admission and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. In addition to the baseline care plan, residents are also expected to receive a list of their admission medications. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. The findings include: 1) Resident #21's medical record was reviewed on 9/20/21 at 9:10 AM for his/her admission in July of 2021. During a review of the medical record, a baseline care plan was found that was supposed to be given to the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to 1) update the care plans to reflect the removal of a Foley catheter for the residents (#26, #51), and 2) have a care plan meeting in August 2021 for resident #28. This was evident for 3 out 46 residents reviewed for the annual survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record on 9/21/21 at 9 am, revealed a care plan, initiated 8/24/21 for Resident has a continuous urinary Foley for urine retention and neurogenic bladder. Neurogenic Bladder-the nerves that carry messages back- and- forth between the brain and the spinal cord don't work the way they should. Urinary Retention is a condition in which you cannot empty all the urine from your bladder. A continued review of the medical record revealed that Resident #26's Foley Catheter was removed on 9/11/21; however, the care plan was not updated to reflect the removal of the Foley catheter. During an interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) on 9/21/21 at 11 am, she verified the Foley catheter was removed on 9/11/21. 2. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation of resident # 35, it was determined that facility failed to turn and reposition a resident who could not do so independently. This was evident for 1 (#35) out of 1 resident. Findings include: (Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Nursing Home Assessment The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process entails a comprehensive, standardized assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and health needs.) On 9/13/21 at 10:30 AM, an interview was held with resident # 35. Resident had a history of multiple sclerosis and a stage 3 pressure ulcer on sacrum. According to MDS dated [DATE], resident # 35 was a two person plus for bed mobility. Resident had a care plan for wounds and ADL care including turning and repositioning. On 9/13/21, resident was laying on her back in the same position as she was at 7:40 AM. On 9/13/21 during interview, resident # 35 stated that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complaint, a facility reported investigation, and interview with the ombudsman and facility staff, it was determined that 1) RN staff #11 failed to replace an empty oxygen tank for resident #213 that was empty, and 2) the nursing staff failed to administer an injectable anticoagulant timely. This was evident for 2 (Residents #213, #114) of 46 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. Findings include: 1) On 9/14/21 at 9 AM, an investigation was conducted for resident # 213, who stated to the ombudsman that on 7/20/19, his/ her O2 tank ran out of oxygen while she/he was in the dining room eating. Resident # 213 had an order for Oxygen 2 Liters continuous, written on 7/13/21. Resident reported to GNA staff # 12 that her oxygen had run out. GNA staff # 12 reported to nurse # 11 that resident # 213's oxygen had run out. Staff #11 stated to GNA that there is no need to replace oxygen at this time, and to monitor resident for SPO2 and let him know if it reaches below 84% on room air and then he/she will replace the oxygen. When SPO2 reached 84 % on room air, GNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with GNA, facility failed to have sufficient staff on the Eastern Shore unit on 9/13/21 7-3 shift. This was evident for 34 out of 34 residents. Findings include: The Eastern Shore unit had 34 residents on the unit on 9/13/21. There were two GNAs assigned on 9/13/21 to work on the 7-3 PM shift on that floor. On 9/13/21 at 8:30 AM, during breakfast service on the Eastern shore unit, it was noted that residents were being dressed and sent to the dinning room to eat breakfast. Some of the residents were being fed by staff members. After residents were fed, the bedbound residents were served and fed their breakfast, which resulted in one resident # 35 getting his/ her tray at 10:50 AM. Resident # 35 stated that this happened all the time. No other care was provided to this resident until after she/he was fed. Resident # 35 was also not turned and repositioned or changed and had a history of pressure ulcer wound stage 3 on sacrum. Surveyor interviewed GNA #7 and he/she stated 'the nurses on the unit are giving out medications and do not help deliver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on reviews of administrative records and staff interview, it was determined that the nursing administrative staff failed to 1) conduct a yearly performance review on 2 (#40, # 43) out of 5 geriatric nursing assistant staff for the year of 2021, and 2) ensure that 2 (#40, # 43) out of 5 geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) staff completed a minimum of 12 hours of education per year. The findings include: During an interview on 09/22/2021 at 1:34 PM, the facility ADON stated that he/she was unable to produce documentation which indicated that 2 (#40, # 43) of 5 sampled GNA staff members had a performance review during the past year. (staff member #40, with a hire date of 11/11/2013 and staff member #43, with a hire date of 07/02/2000) or that staff member #40 and staff # 43 received at least 12 hours of training/education in the past 12 months as required.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on reviews of administrative records and staff interview, it was determined that the nursing administrative staff failed to ensure that 5 ( GNAs #22, 40, 41, 42, 43) out of 5 geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) staff received and completed minimum training for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders, as well as residents with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder. The findings include: During an interview on 09/22/2021 at 1:34 PM, the facility ADON stated that he/she was unable to produce documentation that indicated 5 sampled GNA staff members received training for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders, as well as residents with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder. The following GNA staff did not receive residents with mental and psychosocial disorders, as well as residents with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, training for 2020-2021: 1) GNA #22 2) GNA #40 3) GNA #41 4) GNA #42 5) GNA #43 Cross reference F 838
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, it was determined the facility failed to discard medications after the expiration date. This was evident for 1 of 2 nursing units observed. The findings include: Observation of the medication storage room on Baltimore-unit one on 9/20/21 at 2:59 PM revealed an IV (Intravenous) solution Bag labeled (D 5% Dextrose/0.9% Sodium Chloride injection USP 1000 ml bag) lying in an upper cabinet with other IV solutions. The IV solution was dated with an expiration date of August 2021. During an interview with the unit manager RN staff #28 on 9/20/21 at 3:15 PM, he/she stated the pharmacy had just been in to change the container. The DON was made aware of the findings on 9/20/21 at 3:30 PM.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews of residents and facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to follow residents' meal tickets and provide foods that were consistent with the resident diet plan and provide meals on time. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #10, #261) out of 46 residents investigated for food concerns during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: An interview was conducted with resident # 10 on 9/13/21 at 10:30 am and s/he complained that the food was not correct when it was brought by the nursing staff. The resident went on to say that the dietary department staff were unable to read the dietary slips and stated that if they were reading the diet slips correctly, why was s/he not served items ordered on his/her menu slip. A review of the ticket on resident #10's tray read hot Tea, potatoes, waffles, and turkey sausage. The plated foods were 2 waffles and 3 turkey sausages which were cold per the resident. The resident also stated that breakfast was sometimes served as late as 11 am at times. According to the meal schedule, the trays were due on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complaint, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident with a meal within the required time frame. This was evident for 2 (Resident #35, #114) of 2 residents who were totally dependent upon staff to feed them. This was observed during dining observations during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 9/13/21 at 10:50 AM, an interview was being conducted with resident # 35, when GNA #20 brought in a breakfast tray. This surveyor asked GNA 20 why the tray was delivered so late, and she stated that there were only 2 GNAs here and we have a lot of residents that needed to be fed on the Eastern Shore Unit. GNA went on to say there were 6 residents that needed to be fed on the low side (rooms 1-18) and 3 residents that needed to be fed on High Side (rooms 19-36). On the day of the survey, (9/13/21) the census was 34 residents, which was 17 residents for each GNA. GNA stated that the nurse on the floor on 9/13/21 was giving out medications and that the Unit manager does not help feed residents or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4) On 9/21/21 at 10:56 AM, a review of Resident #263's medical records revealed on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 5/2021, an order initiated on 5/3/21, that read, Sacrum: cleanse with wound cleaner then apply calcium alginate with silver and cover with foam dressing. Every day shift for wound healing. Further review of Resident #263's medical record revealed that staff had failed to document the assessment of this wound or a notification to the physician and resident representative regarding the wound. On 9/21/21 at 2:00 PM, an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed that she was unable to locate any skin sheets or documentation regarding Resident #263's sacral wound. 3) On 9/22/21 at 12:05 PM, an investigation was conducted for resident # 28 who had a history of aggressive behavior towards other residents and staff. It was documented in resident # 28's progress notes that resident hit other residents with his/her cane, and wheelchair, He/she has also pushed residents causing them to fall, and cursed at staff and residents. He/she refused to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff had failed to conduct quality assurance meetings on a quarterly basis. This was evident for 2 of 4 Quality Assurance meetings. The findings include: On 9/21/21 at 3:01 PM, a review of the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) meeting notebook revealed that QA meetings had not occurred on a quarterly basis in the past 12 months [[DATE] - [DATE]]. The facility held meetings in 11/20, 12/20, 1/21, 6/21, 7/21, and 8/21. An interview with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 9/22/21, revealed that he/she had started employment with this facility in 6/21, therefore had been unable to provide explanation of missed QA meetings.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it had been determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to prevent the spread of infection by ensuring 1) that residents had been offered both pneumococcal vaccinations as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and 2) that staff had provided immunization records in writing at the time of hire. This was evident for 3 (#19, #35, and #31) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations and 5 (#40, #41, #42, #43, and #22) of 5 staff reviewed for immunization records. The findings include: 1) On 9/20/21 at 10:15 AM, review of Resident #19's immunization records revealed that the resident had not received a Pneumococcal 13 vaccination and facility staff failed to offer Resident #19 the vaccination. On 9/20/21 at 10:17 AM, review of Resident #35's immunization records revealed that Resident #35 had not received a Pneumococcal 23 vaccination following a Pneumococcal 13 vaccination on 11/22/19. Further review revealed that the facility staff had failed to offer Resident #35 a Pneumococcal 23 vaccination. On 9/20/21 at 10:30 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of employee records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have documentation that Geriatric Nursing Assistance's (GNA) were given 1) in-service training no less than 12 hours per year, 2) dementia management training and abuse prevention training, 3) a yearly performance review, and 4) training for GNA's that provided services to residents with cognitive impairments. This was evident for 5 of 5 GNA employee records (Staff #22, #40, #41, #42 and #43) that took place during the sufficient and competent nursing staffing task reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: During an interview with the facility assistant director of nurses (ADON) on 09/22/2021 at 1:34 PM, she/he stated that he/she was unable to produce documentation which indicated that 5 sampled GNA staff members received the following training: 1). Staff member #40, with a hire date of 11/11/2013 and Staff member #43, with a hire date of 07/02/2000 had not received 12 hours of training/education in the past 12 months 2) Staff member #40, with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-09-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to 1) ensure that required documentation regarding a resident's transfer and appeal rights were provided to residents when transferred to the hospital; and 2) to inform the Ombudsman of transfers and discharges. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #61) reviewed for hospitalization but has the potential to affect any resident transferred out of the facility. The findings include: On 9/17/18 review of Resident #61's medical record revealed that the resident had been discharged to the hospital in August 2018 and re-admitted several days later. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that the resident, or a resident representative, had been provided written notification of the reason for the transfer or a statement of the resident's appeal rights. On 9/17/18 at approximately 12 noon the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that they had devised a form to use for notification and were trying to figure out how to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure staff documented the reason why a resident did not attend the interdisciplinary team care plan meeting and 2) update and revise a care plan for a resident with identified changes in need related to mobility status. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 29 residents (Resident #61 and #17) reviewed for care plan participation and revision during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care 1) On 9/17/18 review of Resident #61's medical record revealed the resident was admitted in August 2018, was able to communicate without problem and was cognitively intact. Further review of the medical record revealed that a care plan meeting occurred on 8/28/18 but no documentation was found that the resident attended or was invited to the meeting. On 9/17/18 at 1:53 PM the social worker reported that letters are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-09-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for a functionally and cognitively impaired resident (Resident #27). This was evident for 1 of 1 residents selected for pressure ulcer review in the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is an assessment of the resident completed by the facility staff. The MDS is a multi-disciplinarian tool that allows many facets of the resident's care (cognition, behavior, mobility, activities of daily living and skin conditions.) On 9/14/18 Resident's #27's medical records were reviewed, this review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility for long term care and with diagnoses which includes Dementia, osteoarthritis and hypothyroidism Review of the April 2018 MDS assessment reveals the following: the resident is cognitively impaired and is dependent on staff for all functional activities such as bed mobility, transfers, eating, turning and positioning. Review of the wound management documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2018-09-17 · tag F0772 — isolatedHave an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a physician ordered lab on a Resident (#21) This was evident in 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 on 9/14/18 at 11:43 AM, revealed diagnoses including Parkinson disease, dementia and hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed an order on 8/30/18 for a basic metabolic panel (BMP test panel the kidneys, blood glucose level, and electrolyte and acid/base balance). Review of the medical record revealed that this lab was never completed. This concern was reviewed with the DON on 9/14/18 at 3:34 PM that the lab was not completed.
- Potential for harm · D2018-09-17 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure laboratory test results were kept in the resident's medical record for review by medical practitioners. This deficient practice was found to be evident for 1 out of 29 residents (Resident #34) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey and resulted in the re-ordering of a lab test. The findings include: On 9/14/18 review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an order, dated 7/12/18 for a CBC (complete blood count) and a CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel). Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any laboratory results for the CBC and CMP that were ordered on 7/12/18. Further review of the medical record revealed an order, dated 8/9/18, to: please track down labs ordered on 7/12 (CBC, CMP). There is another, separate order, written after the order to track down the labs but also dated 8/9/18 for a CBC and a CMP for the next morning. On 9/14/18 the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that lab results are kept on the resident's charts. Surveyor then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure documentation of certifications of incapacity to make health care decisions were completed prior to allowing health care agents to make decisions for the resident. This was found to be evident for 1 out of the 29 residents (Resident #45) reviewed during the survey. The findings include: On [DATE] review of Resident #45's medical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment but had clear speech and was usually able to make him/herself understood. Review of the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) completed on [DATE], which was after the resident's admission to the facility, revealed the orders had been entered as a result of a discussion with and consent of the patient's health care agent as named in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to put a system in place to ensure proper infection surveillance policies and procedures are in place by not implementing a plan to monitor the duration/outcome of antibiotic therapy. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. Findings include: A line listing is a table in which important information is recorded on each person who is currently or potentially ill with an infection. The information recorded can be used to monitor unusual and expected outcomes to determine if current therapies or practices are effective or require changes. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Policies was conducted on 09/17/18 at 12:48 PM. Review of the residents' line listing revealed that there was no documentation of the duration of or the outcome of antibiotic treatments given to residents. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 09/17/18 at 1:03 PM she acknowledged that since the line listing failed to outline this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to put a system in place to ensure that there is documentation in the resident's medical record of the information/education provided regarding the benefits and risks of immunization (and the administration or the refusal of or medical contraindications to the vaccines.) This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors in the facility. Finding includes: Review of the residents' immunization records were conducted on 09/17/18 at 12:48 PM. It revealed that there was no documentation to support that these residents or their resident representatives had received education or information regarding immunization. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 09/17/18 at 1:03 PM she acknowledged surveyor's findings.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,113 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,113 — penalty dated 2025-12-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CARROLL MD HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2024 |
| MAYER, MOISHE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 03/01/2024 |
| SCHERER, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| BHARAJ, NARENDER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215265. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.