Stella Maris, Inc.
2300 Dulaney Valley Road, Timonium, MD 21093 · Non profit - Corporation · 390 certified beds · (410) 252-4500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.6% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.7% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 2.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.2% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.6% | 16.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.5% | 13.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.7% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.20 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,222 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 556 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.6%CMS range 58.7–63.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.3%CMS range 12.7–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 4.7%CMS range 3.6–6.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 390 beds and averages 340.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.450 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for Resident #55 and Resident #84. This was evident for 2 residents out of 9 residents reviewed for activities of daily living during the facility's annual survey.The findings include: 1) On 07/15/2025 at 3:30 PM, during the surveyor's follow-up observation rounds of the 1st Floor [NAME] Unit, while also accompanied by the Unit Manager #22, Resident #55 was observed from the hallway through the completely ajar door, and no privacy curtain in use. Resident #55 was seated in a wheelchair next to the bedside, while Wound Nurse #21 was performing wound care to the resident's left lower extremity. On 07/15/2026 at 3:31 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview of Unit Manager #22, who confirmed the same observation of the Wound Nurse #21 performing wound care to Resident #55's left lower extremity with no privacy curtain and door open, with Resident #55 able to be seen from the hallway during dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and the facility's investigation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Resident #199 was free from verbal abuse by staff. This deficient practice was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse during the recertification survey. The facility implemented corrective measures following this incident, therefore, this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. The date of correction was 6/7/25.Findings include:The facility-reported incident was reviewed on 7/21/25 at 10:00 a.m. The investigation revealed that on 4/15/25, at approximately 11:10 p.m., Resident #199 reported that GNA Staff #25 called the resident fat and questioned the resident about not being able to hold urine and stool. Medical record review revealed that the resident was incontinent.During interviews, Witness GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant)#27 stated GNA Staff #25 was angry and repeatedly called Resident #199 names related to the resident's incontinence, expressing frustration over the need to use the sit-to-stand lift instead of performing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and an injury of unknown origin to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within the specified timeframe. This was evident for 2 residents (Resident #177 and Resident #161) out of 10 residents investigated for Facility Reported Incidents during this facility's annual survey.The findings include: 1) On 07/18/25 at 8:32 AM, during the facility's reported incident record review, it revealed the facility reported to OHCQ on 07/02/25 at 4:55 PM that GNA #23 stated they observed GNA #23 hit Resident #177 at approximately 9:00 AM. On 07/23/25 at 9:03 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Director of Nursing #2 regarding the delay in reporting alleged physical abuse to OHCQ; stated they are aware there was a delay in the time of reporting to OHCQ. On 7/23/25 at approximately 3:00 PM, the surveyor shared the concern of delayed reporting to OHCQ during the exit conference with the facility's Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Executive Director. 2) Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the resident/resident representative (RP) in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 1 (#90) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization during a recertification. The findings include: During the investigation of Complaint 339997 on 7/17/25 at 10am revealed Resident #90 was recently hospitalized . On 7/17/25 at 10:15 am a review of nurses' progress notes and change in condition documentation dated 6/18/25 at 01:05 am revealed Resident #90 was sent to the ER (emergency room) via 911 on 6/18/25.However, there was no documentation/evidence that the resident and/or RP were notified in writing about the reason for transfer to the hospital. On 7/17/25 at 11:15 AM an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator regarding written notification of reason for transfer to the hospital, she stated that the reason for transfer was documented in the change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required a Hoyer lift for transfer was transferred correctly. This was evident for 1 (Resident #161) out of 8 residents reviewed during the survey.The findings include the following:During an interview on 07/16/2025 at 4:00 PM Resident #161 alleged that staff assisted him/her into the wheelchair and because of the transfer sustained a left lower extremity fracture.Review of Resident #161's medical record on 07/18/2025 at 9:55 AM revealed a care plan with a focus area that was initiated on 12/31/2024 stating that resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to right above the knee amputation and muscle weakness with an approach that resident requires Mechanical Lift (Hoyer) with 2 staff assistance for transfers.Review of Resident #161's medical record and other pertinent documentation on 07/18/2025 at 10:00 AM revealed that on 05/09/2025 prior to going to dialysis, Staff #7 and #8 assisted and transferred the resident using stand/pivot to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-07-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident medical records were accurate. This was evident for 2 (Resident #310 and #84) out of 6 residents reviewed during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include: 1. On 07/18/25 at 10:56 AM, review of resident records revealed that Resident #310's care plan referred to Resident #310 as [incorrect resident name]. On 07/18/25 at 12:38 PM, the Director of Nursing staff #2 was interviewed. During the interview, Staff #2 was made aware that Resident #310's care plan referred to Resident #310 with the incorrect resident name. Staff #2 stated that the facility will correct Resident #310's care plan. 2. During an interview on 7/15/25 at 9:58AM Unit Manager #17 stated to the surveyor that GNA #18 had went to find help from another staff member because the resident required the transfer assistance of two staff. On 7/17/25 at 11:45AM the surveyor reviewed the medical record of Resident #84 which revealed the following care plan intervention in place dated as initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This was evident for 3 residents (#161, #3, #55) out of 9 residents investigated during the survey.The findings include:Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP): Enhanced Barrier Precautions are used as an infection control intervention that uses targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities in nursing homes to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).1. On 07/15/2025 at 3:30 PM during the surveyor's follow-up observation rounds of the 1st Floor [NAME] Unit, while also accompanied by the Unit Manager #22, Resident #55 was observed in the room from the hallway through the completely ajar door and no privacy curtain in use. There was an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign present on the door. Resident #55 was seated in a wheelchair next to the door-side bed, while Wound Nurse #21 sat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents. This was evident for 1 unit out of 9 units investigated during the survey.The findings include:1. On 07/15/25 at 9:21 AM during observation rounds on 1st Floor [NAME] the surveyor observed rooms 164, 166, 168, and 170 bathroom vents were with approximate 1 thick gray fuzzy matter. On 07/15/2025 10:30 AM during interview Unit Manager #22 notified of findings and was informed a request for cleaning was mentioned at the last Ops Meeting in June. On 07/15/2025 at 12:15 PM during interview Nursing Home Administrator #1 and review of facility records it revealed the Ops meeting minutes, held 06/20/25 indicated Nursing Updates: vents in 1K need to be cleaned.2. On 07/15/25 at 9:22 AM during observation rounds on 1st Floor [NAME] Unit the surveyor observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom with a gouged-out area to the wall approximately 1 1/2 ft. x 1/2 ft.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of facility reported incidents, complaint, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) within 2 hours of the allegation and failed to report bruises of unknown origin to OHCQ. This was evident for 12 (#22, #24, #47, #4, #56, #34, #42, #7, #21, #25, #19, #36 ) of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/26/25 at 11:47 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00195422 was conducted. The Executive Director was contacted by licensed practical nurse (LPN) #84 who stated the family of Resident #22 alleged that geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #85 handled Resident #22 abruptly while providing care on 8/10/23. Review of the facility's investigation revealed the alleged incident happened on 8/10/23 at 11:00 AM. This is when the nurse became aware of the incident. Review of the email confirmation to OHCQ revealed the initial report was not submitted until 8/10/23 at 7:02 PM, which was not within 2 hours of alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility administrative records, facility investigations, complaint, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents of alleged abuse, neglect, and bruises of unknown origin. This was evident for 10 (#22, #65, #47, #4, #56, #42, #7, #26, #19, #36) of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 3/26/25 at 11:47 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00195422 was conducted. The Executive Director was contacted by licensed practical nurse (LPN) #84 who stated the family of Resident #22 alleged that geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) #85 handled Resident #22 abruptly while providing care on 8/10/23. Review of the facility's investigation revealed a typed statement from a Sister that documented Resident #22 kept saying, I hate that woman; I don't want her to touch me again. When the nurse went in the room with GNA #85, Resident #22 appeared frightened when she saw GNA #85. A written statement from the nurse documented that the resident said he/she was hit and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff, and review of complaint, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and monitor temperatures in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared in the facility's kitchen. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure food is served to residents at temperatures to ensure food safety. On 4/8/25 at 12:29 PM the Surveyor observed lunch meal service to the Residents on the 1 [NAME] nursing unit. At that time the facility staff were setting up meal service and residents were seated in the dining room. After the residents were all served in the dining room the facility staff began to prepare trays for residents who dine in their room at 1:06 PM. At that time the Surveyor requested a test tray and took temperatures. At the same time Staff #36 also took temperatures of the same test tray using a facility's thermometer. Hot foods are to be maintained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's and vendor's pest control logs and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This was evident for 3 of 8 nursing units (1P, 3P and 3S) and the kitchen during a complaint survey. The findings include: During investigation of multiple complaints from resident families regarding mice sightings in the facility on nursing units 1P, 3S and 3P, the surveyor reviewed on 4/7, 4/8 and 4/9/25 the facility's and vendor's pest control logs from 1/1/25 until 4/8/25 and completed interviews. 1. Review of the facility's pest control logs revealed the following: a) On 1/10/25 facility staff stated they disposed of a dead mouse in room [ROOM NUMBER] last evening b) On 1/30/25 facility staff stated moving recliner chairs in Rooms 315 & 324 there were a lot of mouse droppings. c) On 3/7/25 facility staff stated night nurse stating residents complaining about mice in rooms. d) On 4/4/25 facility staff stated residents states seeing 2 mice in room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain consent from the Resident's representative prior to administering a new medication to a resident (Resident # 33). This was evident for 1 of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record on 3/27/25 the Resident was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life. Further review of Resident's medical record revealed the Resident was seen by the Psychiatric Practitioner (Staff #70) on 9/18/23 and at that time Staff #70 ordered Depakote 125 mg twice a day for dementia with behavioral disturbances. Depakote is a medication that can treat seizures and bipolar disorder. Staff #70 documented at that time unable to reach resident's representative to discuss progress and plan. Further review of Resident #33's medical record revealed the facility staff assessed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician of the inability to obtain an opthamology consult. This was evident for 1 (#7) residents reviewed for 40 complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/31/25 at 8:34 AM a review of complaint MD00212199 was conducted. The complainant alleged that Resident #7 was hit by his/her aide. The complaint alleged Resident #7 had a bruise on his/her face from the incident. Review of a 11/22/24 at 2:30 PM SBAR (change in condition note) documented, around 0815 writer was called to room by GNA. GNA had just walked into the room and noticed bruising to left peri-orbital region with a small gash to left eyebrow. Resident initially stated that [he/she] was hit with a dish. Then stated that [he/she] was turned over (in bed) and hit [his/her] head. A 11/22/24 at 7:11 PM provider note documented, Note: Patient noted with left periorbital swelling, erythema, tenderness and hematoma extending towards nasal bridge and inner canthus of left eye. The assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a facility reported incident with documentation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to protect a vulnerable adult from physical abuse. This was evident for 1 (#34) resident reviewed for 27 facility reported incidents reviewed during a complaint survey. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident prior to the start of this survey. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey; therefore this deficiency was found to be past noncompliance with a compliance date of 10/16/23.The findings include:On 3/27/25 at 3:03 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00198080 alleged that on 10/5/23 at approximately 9:00 AM, GNA #16 was providing morning care to Resident #34. Resident #34 was swinging his/her arms at GNA #16, and LPN #15 witnessed the interaction. According to GNA #16, LPN #15 came running in the room, got close to Resident #34, then walked back to close the door. LPN #15 came back rushing and slapped Resident #34 in the face hard on the right side at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 4 (#30, #24, #15, #29) of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 3/31/25 at 10:00 AM Resident #30's medical record was reviewed and revealed a 2/2/24 progress note that documented Resident #30 had an unwitnessed fall and was bleeding from the head. Resident #30 was sent to the emergency room and returned to the facility on 2/3/24 at 5:30 AM. Resident #30 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that a baseline care plan was provided to the resident and resident representative within 48 hours of admission to the facility (Resident #33 and #65). This was evident for 2 of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The baseline care plan is given to residents within 48 hours of their admission and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. In addition to the baseline care plan, residents are also expected to receive a list of their admission medications. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. 1. During interview with Resident #33's representative (RP) on 4/2/25 at 10:12 AM, the RP stated he/she was never given a baseline care plan or had a meeting with the facility staff to discuss. Review of Resident #33's medical record on 4/2/25 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to develop and a comprehensive, resident centered care plans for altered skin integrity. This was evident for 1 (#30) of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 3/31/25 at 10:00 AM a review of complaint MD00201834 alleged that Resident #30 received a pressure ulcer due to care issues in the facility. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed a 1/6/24 progress note that documented Resident #30 had erythema noted to the bilateral buttocks and a rash to the bilateral upper/posterior thighs. An anti-fungal powder was ordered Review of Resident #30's January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented the order, in house antifungal powder to posterior upper & inner thighs BID (twice per day) until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 3 (#5, #38, #14) of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to administer medications to Resident #5 as ordered by the eye doctor. Review of Resident #5's medical record on 4/3/25 the Resident was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 with a diagnosis to include legal blindness. Further review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the Resident went to the Eye Doctor on 2/7/25 and at that time was assessed to have a diagnosis of Glaucoma, Entropion and dry eye. Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases that damage the optic nerve, potentially leading to vision loss or blindness, often due to increased eye pressure. Entropion is a condition where the eyelid turns inward, causing eyelashes to rub against the eye, leading to irritation, pain, and potentially, corneal damage. Dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #55). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during a complaint survey. The findings included: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a unique form of pressure ulcer. The National…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain weekly weights on admission and failed to recognize a weight loss for a resident (Resident #33). This was evident for 1 of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record on 3/27/25 documented the Resident was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life. Further review of Resident's medical record revealed the facility staff documented a nutritional assessment was completed on 9/19/23. At that time the Dietitian (Staff #72) documented, intake is fair presently-weekly weights initiated to evaluate additional intervention. Review of the Resident's weights documented revealed the facility staff documented a weight on 9/27/23 of 232.8 pounds and on 10/17/23 of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a complaint, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide timely medication to meet the needs of the residents. This was evident for 1 (#14) resident reviewed for 40 complaints reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/27/25 at 1:15 PM a review of complaint MD00210066 alleged that there was a problem with the A&D ointment that was ordered for Resident #14. It was alleged that the ointment was received however the staff was not consistent with using the ointment and then kept telling the resident it was not available from the pharmacy and had been re-ordered. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an order for A and D Prevent External Ointment that was to be applied to the perineal area topically every shift for skin protectant with each incontinence care. The start date of the order was 9/1/24. Review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented each time the ointment was administered as evidence by the nurse's initials and a check mark. Whenever there were nurse's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and documentation review it was determined that facility staff failed to keep medication carts locked when unattended and date medications when opened. This was evident on 3 of 7 nursing units observed during random observations made during the complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 4/2/25 at 9:48 AM observation was made on the 1 Knot unit of an unlocked medication cart sitting outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor was able to open the top drawer of the medication cart which contained resident medications. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #32 stated she had just walked into the resident's room for a minute. 2) On 4/2/25 at 10:08 AM observation was made on the 1P unit of an unlocked and unattended medication cart at the nurse's station. The surveyor walked up and opened the top drawer. The surveyor had previously seen the medication cart sitting at the nurse's station unlocked with LPN #22 sitting at a computer at the nurse's station and unit secretary #28 sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory services for a resident as ordered (Resident #33). This was evident for 1 of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record on 3/27/25, the Resident was admitted in September 2023 with a diagnosis to include dementia. Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life. Further review of Resident #33's medical record revealed on 11/17/25 the Nurse Practitioner (Staff #71) ordered a c diff sample. To test for C. difficile, a stool sample is collected and sent to a lab for analysis, where they look for the presence of the bacterium and its toxins. Further review of Resident #33's medical record revealed a change of condition note on 11/22/23 at 6:50 PM that stated Resident's representative visited him/her at bedside at 2 PM today and requested he/she be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain outside services for residents in a timely manner. This was evident for 2 (#5, #7) of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record on 4/3/25 the Resident was admitted to the facility in December of 2024 with a diagnosis to include chronic kidney disease. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed on 12/10/24 the physician ordered a nephrologist consult for chronic kidney disease stage IV. Further review of the medical record revealed the Resident has not been seen by the nephrologist or has a appointment scheduled. Interview with the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing on 4/7/25 at 2:09 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to schedule an appointment for Resident #5 to see a nephrologist.2. The facility failed to obtain an ophthalmology consult as requested by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) for a resident with orbital bruising and swelling. On 3/31/25 at 8:34 AM a review of complaint MD00212199 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #20). This was evident for 1 of 71 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. Review of Resident #20's medical record on 4/3/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in August 2023 and admitted to hospice services on 6/20/24. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed no documentation from hospice to include progress notes, assessments and plan for Resident #20 from hospice. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/4/25 at 12:54 PM confirmed Resident #20's medical record did not include documentation from hospice and the DON was able to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on complaint review, observation, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program by failing to follow infection control guidlines during the handling and storage of linens and other patient care items. This was evident for 2 of 7 units observed during random observations made while touring the facility during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 3/31/25 at 7:40 AM a review of complaint MD00214733 revealed the facility did not follow infection control guidelines. On 4/2/25 at 9:32 AM observation was made on the 1 Knot unit, outside of room K188, of a soiled linen cart. On top of the soiled linen cart was a box of gloves, cleanser, silicone cream ointment, and an opened Pepsi bottle. There was also a list of resident names with names and weights. There was a pink pen next to the paper. The patient care items were not stored properly. Observation was made in the hallway, across from 1K, room K180, of a resident's over the bed tray table with clean linen, sheets, towels, and diapers sitting on top of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-11 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code the resident's status on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (Resident #176, #242, #288, #310, #298, #381 and #290). This was evident for 7 out of 89 residents selected for review during an annual survey. The findings include: The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gathers information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1. Review of Resident #176's medical record on [DATE] revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems. Observation of Resident #176 on [DATE] at 8:45 AM and [DATE] at 8:35 AM revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate care plans for Residents #381, #279 and #685. This was evident for 3 of 89 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: A nursing care plan (NCP) is a formal process that correctly identifies existing needs and recognizes potential needs or risks. Care plans provide communication among nurses, their patients, and other healthcare providers to achieve health care outcomes. Without the nursing care planning process, the quality and consistency of patient care would be lost. Nursing care planning begins when the client is admitted to the agency and is continuously updated throughout in response to the client's changes in condition and evaluation of goal achievement. 1 A. The facility staff failed to initiate a care plan to address high blood pressure. Medical record review for Resident #381 on 5/6/22 at 11:00 AM revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The facility staff failed to notify the physician or certified registered nurse practitioner (CRNP) of elevated blood pressures as ordered by the physician. Medical record review for Resident #6 on 5/4/22 at 9:30 AM revealed on 1/26/21 the physician ordered: blood pressure 2 times a day, notify the physician or CRNP for systolic blood pressure (top number) above 170. Medical record review revealed the following documented blood pressures: 4/2/22 (Monday) at 2:52 PM 178/72; 3/26/22 at 8:07 AM 184/74; 3/10/22 at 8:55 AM 180/72; 1/29/22 at 8:32 AM 191/65, 1/21/22 (Friday) at 10:20 AM 183/73; 1/8/22 at 9:00 AM 202/79; 12/8/21 (Wednesday) at 9:25 AM 183/66; however, the facility staff failed to notify the physician or CRNP of the blood pressures as ordered. The resident is in dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/5/22 at 8:00 AM confirmed the facility staff failed to notify the physician or CRNP of elevated blood pressures as ordered. Interview with the Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents and facility staff, the facility failed to serve residents food which was palatable and did not serve food at the preferred temperature. This was evident for 3 of 89 residents (Residents #132, #158 and #316) selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: During observation of the facility staff serving breakfast on 4/20/22 at 8:55 AM, the Surveyor observed the facility staff serving breakfast in plastic containers from a hot table in the dining room. The facility staff then would distribute the plastic containers to all the residents on the unit that were eating in their rooms. A. During interview with Resident #158 on 4/19/22 at 11:10 AM the Resident stated often when he/she receives his/her meals the food is cold. Observation of Resident #158 on 5/3/22 at 9:48 AM revealed his/her breakfast was served in a plastic container containing 3 compartments. The Resident stated at the time it is hard to cut up meats with plastic silverware and in the small plastic containers. B. Observation of Resident #316 on 5/3/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and a review of community meeting minutes it was determined that the facility staff failed to act promptly upon the request of the residents regarding how meals are served. This was evident for one out of the six months reviewed. The findings are: This surveyor met with the residents on 5/2/22 at 2:00 PM as part of the mandatory Resident Council review task of the annual recertification survey process. The residents were interviewed, and they stated that they requested the facility return to serving meals on glass plates and providing metal silverware. The residents said the facility had implemented the use of plastic trays and plastic silverware because of COVID, but they would like a return to the previous method. The residents stated that concerns are raised at the community meetings each month. They sometimes get answers and sometimes they don't. A review of the December 30, 2021, community meeting minutes revealed that the residents requested a clarification on protocol for paper versus plastic usage for meals -- residents share it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to prevent verbal abuse from a Certified Medication Aid (#4) to Resident #279. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for review of abuse during the survey process and 1 of 89 residents selected for review during the survey. The findings include: Medical record for Resident #279 on 4/20/22 at 10:30 AM and review of facility reported intake MD00169316 revealed the allegation that CMA#4 was observed by peers speaking loudly to Resident #279. It was also alleged CMA #4 pointing her finger and speaking unkindly to Resident #279. It was observed that the resident became tearful and upset. The CMA was removed from the facility and sent home. The resident stated that she/he felt better after the CMA was sent home and did not want CMA #4 to provide care to her/him anymore. Other residents were interviewed at that time and there were no other verbalizations related to care issues. The CMA #4 was terminated from the facility. Surveyor observation and interview with Resident #279 on 4/20/22 at 11:30 AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to honor the personal preferences interventions on the care plan for Resident #383. This was evident for 1 of 89 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include. A nursing care plan (NCP) is a formal process that correctly identifies existing needs and recognizes potential needs or risks. Care plans provide communication among nurses, their patients, and other healthcare providers to achieve health care outcomes. Without the nursing care planning process, the quality and consistency of patient care would be lost. Nursing care planning begins when the client is admitted to the agency and is continuously updated throughout in response to the client's changes in condition and evaluation of goal achievement. Medical record review for Resident #383 on 4/21/22 at 11:45 AM revealed the facility staff initiated a care plan for personal preferences for Resident #383 on 10/2/19: Personal Preferences: Things I don't like: I don't like loud noises, does not like her/his door closed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical review, it was determined the facility staff failed to prevent Resident #279 from receiving unnecessary medication. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents selected for review of unnecessary medications and 1 of 89 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #279 on 4/29/21 at 10:45 AM revealed on 6/16/21 the physician ordered: Lasix 20 milligrams by mouth every day for edema, hold for systolic blood pressure (top number) less than 110. Lasix is used to reduce extra fluid in the body (edema) caused by conditions such as heart failure, liver disease, and kidney disease. This can lessen symptoms such as shortness of breath and swelling in the arms, legs, and abdomen. This drug is also used to treat high blood pressure. Lasix is a water pill (diuretic) that causes the resident to make more urine which can lower the blood pressure. Medical record review revealed the facility staff documented the resident's blood pressure on: 3/21/22 as 100/67; 3/10/22 as 106/70; 1/27/22 at 101/70; 12/30 as 108/60 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility staff failed to obtain dental services for residents (Resident #242 and #288). This was evident for 2 out of 7 residents reviewed for dental services during an annual survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #242's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observation of Resident #242 on 5/3/22 at 11:50 AM revealed the resident to have only 2 upper teeth that appeared to be broken and multiple broken lower teeth with obvious decay. During interview with the resident at that time, the resident stated he/she would like to see the dentist because his/her gums bother him/her at times and would like to be evaluated for dentures. Further review of Resident #242's medical record revealed the resident has not been seen by the dentist since admission to the facility. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/4/22 at 11:30 AM confirmed the resident has not been seen by dentist. 2. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a meal to Resident #132 within the limited 14-hour time frame. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for food during the survey process and 1 of 89 selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Surveyor interview with Resident #132 on 4/20/22 at 12:00 PM revealed the resident stating that breakfast does not arrive to him/her until 10:00 AM. Review of the Dining Services Meal Delivery Times revealed that Unit 3S was to receive breakfast at 8:40 AM. Surveyor observations of Resident #132 revealed that breakfast was not served until 10:00 AM on 4/20/22 and 10:00 AM on 4/26/22. Further interview with Resident #132 revealed that no snacks are offered at night after dinner. Further review of the Dining Services Meal Delivery Times revealed that dinner is served to 3S at 5:00 PM. If taken into account an hour as for breakfast for the tray to be delivered to Resident #132, 6:00 PM and breakfast observed at 10:00 AM, there is a noted 16-hour span between meals and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility staff failed to provide specialized rehabilitation services as ordered by the physician (Residents #316). This was evident for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed for rehabilitation services during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #316's medical record on 4/21/22 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include contracture right hand and acquired absence of right leg below knee. Further review of the resident's medical record on 5/3/22 revealed a physician order written on 4/19/22 for a consult with Occupational Therapy (OT) to evaluate for finger contracture and a consult with Physical Therapy (PT) to evaluate right prosthesis for friction rub-may need adjustment. During interview with Resident #316 on 5/3/22 at 9:05 AM, the resident stated he/she has not been evaluated by PT and OT for the consults ordered on 4/19/22. During interview with the Interim Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) on 5/4/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, and observations it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain the medical record for Resident #132 in the most accurate and complete form. This was evident for 1 of 89 residents selected for review during an annual survey. The findings include: Medical record for Resident #132 on 4/20/22 at 10:45 AM revealed on 5/5/18 the physician ordered: thigh high teds on in AM. TED Stockings are also known as Compression Stockings or Anti-Embolism. TED Stockings are specially designed stockings that help reduce the risk of developing a blood clot in the lower leg. Surveyor observations of the resident on 4/21/22 at 10:00 AM, 4/25/22 at 1:00 PM, 4/26/22 at 10:30 AM, 4/29/22 at 12:30 PM revealed the resident in bed; however, ted stockings were not in place. Interview with resident during the visit on 4/21/22 revealed that the ted stockings are only put on when the resident gets out of bed (3 days a week). Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/3/22 at 8:30 AM confirmed that the ted stockings are only put on the resident on days the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to administer the Influenza vaccine to Resident #337 per the request of the responsible party (RP). This was evident for 1 of 89 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Influenza is commonly called the flu. Influenza is a respiratory infection that can cause serious complications in older adults. Getting an influenza vaccine - though not 100% effective - is the best way to prevent the misery of the flu and its complications. Medical record review on 4/25/22 at 9:30 AM revealed Resident #337 was admitted to the facility 10/5/21. At that time, the resident's RP gave consent and requested that the resident was to receive the flu vaccine annually and completed the Immunization Consent Form. On 10/5/21 the physician ordered: Influenza Vac (vaccine) High-Dose Suspension Prefilled Syringe, Inject 0.7 ml intramuscularly (into the muscle) one time only for Flu Prevention. Review of the Medication Administration Record revealed the facility staff failed to document the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-09-21 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that: 1) the last annual survey was readily accessible to the public; and 2) identifying information regarding residents was not made available to the public. One of three recent surveys was missing from the survey book and 14 resident names were made public in one of three surveys in the survey book along with other private information. The list included the names of Residents #241; #88; #259; #471; #470; #36; #472; #474; #473; #69; #475; #42; #476; and #167. The findings include: 1) On 9/20/18 at 1:25 PM, the survey book located in the facility lobby was reviewed. Upon examination it was noted the results of the last annual survey were not in the survey book. The Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 10.07.09.09 regarding the Implementation of Residents' [NAME] of Rights states a nursing facility shall post conspicuously in a public place accessible to residents: B (3) The nursing facility's statement of deficiencies for the most recent survey and any subsequent complaint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-09-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility tour, observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that rehabilitation medical records were kept in a confidential manner. This was evident in 2 out of 63 residents involving Residents (R) #139 and R #195 during the survey process. The finding includes: 1) On 9/18/18 at 3:00 P.M. on the first floor, 1 Panborn Long Term Care Unit, the surveyor observed on top of the standing unattended medication cart a medical referral for speech rehabilitation services forms faced up involving Resident #139 and Resident #195. It was on top of an empty anchor lap top pad holder attached to the medication cart. On those medical referral forms the surveyor was able to publicly view written orders for 1) Resident #195, the faxed completed form for speech rehabilitation services which contained the following: date, employee making referral, resident's name, room number, medical change of condition, medical summary for change of condition, a request order from the physician for a speech therapy evaluation and treatment, with the physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2018-09-21 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide written notice of discharge to residents, resident's representatives and the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman when residents were discharged from the facility. This was evident for three of 63 residents selected for review, Resident #s 272, 368 and 166. The findings include: 1) Resident # 272 was discharged to the hospital on August 11, 2018. Review of the resident's record and interview of the assistant administrator on September 21, 2018 at 11:41 AM verified that the required written notification had not been sent. 2) On 9/21/18 at approximately 3:30 PM, Resident #368's medical record was reviewed for a recent hospitalization. It was noted that on 8/10/18, Resident #368 was found unresponsive. The resident had been vomiting a brown coffee like substance. The resident was pale with a weak pulse and therResident's blood sugar was 435, and 452 after being given insulin. The resident was placed on oxygen and sent out to the hospital. During further review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-09-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician's progress notes accurately documented the correct code status for one resident and weight requirements for another resident. This was evident for 2 of 63 residents investigated during the survey. The findings include: 1) On [DATE] beginning at 2:56 PM, the medical record for Resident #118 was reviewed. During the review it was noted that the code status was changed from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) on the Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form. The form was dated [DATE] and was signed by a Nurse Practitioner (NP). The NP also documented in progress notes dated [DATE] that the resident was a DNR per discussion. A provider progress note dated [DATE] stated the resident's code status is Full CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). The physician's progress notes dated [DATE] still stated the resident's code status is Full CPR. On [DATE] at 2:14 PM, Unit Manager #1 was informed of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to update a care plan for a resident for fall risk. This was evident for one (#157) of 63 residents selected for investigation. The findings include: On September 20, 2018, the care plan for Resident # 157 was reviewed for fall risks. The care plan is a document that outlines specific risks to a resident and provides information to staff to tailor care to the resident's needs. The care plan for Rresident # 157, last documented and updated on April 29, 2018, described the resident as a low risk for falls related to confusion, gait and balance problems and incontinence. Review of the resident's medical record, including the nurse's notes and provider (physician or nurse practitioner) notes revealed the following: On February 3, 2018, a Morse Fall Scale was completed for the resident and deemed the resident was at a high risk for falling. On November 3, 2017, the Morse Fall Scale evaluation showed the resident to be at a moderate risk for falling. Review of a Nursing Progress Note dated February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and documentation review it was determined the facility failed to ensurethat nursing staff followed proper hand hygiene while completing a treatment on Resident #260. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents observed while receiving dressing changes during the survey. The findings include: On 8/21/18 at approximately 10:00 AM while observing a dressing change for Resident #260, Staff nurse #2 was observed washing her hands and scrubbing for 8 seconds. When asked how long she should wash her hands, she said she remembered she should wash for as long as it takes to sing Happy Birthday. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends in Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, Techniques for Washing Hands with Soap and Water: >When cleaning your hands with soap and water, wet your hands first with water, apply the amount of product recommended by the manufacturer to your hands, and rub your hands together vigorously for at least 15 seconds, covering all surfaces of the hands and fingers. >Rinse your hands with water and use disposable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2018-09-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations during the initial survey of the facility it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's rooms in a home-like atmosphere. This occurred for one resident out of 63 during the survey process. The findings include: On 9/17/2018 at 11:45 A.M. while interviewing a family member of Resident (#671) in room [ROOM NUMBER], the surveyor and family member both observed that the bed rail had a cracked plastic covering. The cracked plastic portion of the bed rail was wrapped with white paper tape. On 9/17/2018 at 12:30 P.M., the Unit Manager was made aware of the broken bed rail and agreed that the bed rail needed to be repaired and should not be in the room. The facility has the responsibility to its residents to maintain a home-like, clean atmosphere.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERCY HEALTH SERVICES INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/1997 |
| HICKEY, CRYSTAL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| STONE, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| STINNETTE, STEPHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2007 |
| DESAI, CHINTAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/25/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215117. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.