No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mainegeneral Rehab & Long Term Care - Glenridge

40 Glenridge Drive, Augusta, ME 04330 · Non profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (207) 626-2600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (207) 626-2600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 19 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6 E Chestnut St · (207) 623-2977 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.8 mi
403 Water St · (207) 629-9401 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
36 Stone St · (207) 622-9066 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6 Congress St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased35.0%24.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.1%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%2.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.2%11.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.9%25.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.6%17.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.3%29.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.9%20.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.1%74.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%20.8%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%16.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.311.451.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.982.011.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 5.7–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.12
RN hours/ resident / day
0.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
31.8%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 123.1 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page of the Bound Book [a logbook used to record controlled medications], indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts, for 3 of 3 units observed (Cove Unit, Gardens Unit, and Valley Unit).Findings:1. Facility Policy Controlled Medication Storage and Administration, revised 07/2024 states, .The count of Schedule II, III, IV, and V substances shall be recorded and signed at the change of each shift. All counting of narcotics/controlled medications will be driven by first verifying what is documented in the bound book. The actual supply of medication on hand will be checked against this written documentation for accuracy and verified by both nursing personnel.On 3/24/26 at 8:15 a.m., during a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 1 of 3 Units (Cove Unit), a common area and the laundry room for 2 of 2 facility tours. (3/23/26 and 3/26/26) Findings:1. Laundry Room:On 3/23/26 at 8:07 a.m., the surveyor and Environmental Services Manager observed the walls to be missing cove base on many areas around the room. At this time, in an interview with a surveyor, the Environmental Services Manager confirmed the finding. 2. On 3/26/26 from 8:30 a.m. to 9:10 a.m., a surveyor conducted an Environmental tour with the Maintenance Assistant in which the following findings were observed:Common Area:-The bathroom in main entrance lobby area had chipped/missing paint exposing sheetrock above the baseboard heater. The baseboard heater had chipped/missing paint. This created uncleanable surfaces on both areas. 3. Cove Unit:- Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for an air conditioner, food disposal units, shelving, ceiling vents, a grease trap cover, a fan, and an exit door; failed to ensure foods were labeled and/or dated in the kitchen and walk-in refrigerator; and failed to ensure that kitchen staff members with facial hair wore facial hair protection for 1 of 1 kitchen tour. Findings:The facility's Food Storage policy and procedure, dated 3-22, noted Procedure: 7. B. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves . 8. Plastic containers with tight fitting covers or sealable plastic bags must be used for storing grain products, sugar, dried vegetables, and broken lots of bulk foods or opened packages. All containers or storage bags must be legible and accurately labeled and dated. 13. Refrigerated food storage: f. All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated.On 3/23/26 from 8:15 a.m. to 9:10 a.m., a surveyor and the Food Service Director completed an initial kitchen tour in which the following findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents/representatives with written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #12, #72). Findings: 1.Resident 72 was admitted to the facility in 2023. Review of the clinical record lacked evidence that resident's representative had been asked/offered the opportunity to formulate an Advanced Directive. 2 Resident 12 was admitted to the facility in 2024. Review of the clinical record lacked evidence that the resident's representative had been asked/offered the opportunity to formulate an Advanced Directive. During an interview with 4 surveyors on 3/24/26 at 2:45 p.m., Licensed Social Worker (LSW) confirmed the clinical record's did not include evidence that Resident representative's were asked/offered the opportunity to formulate an Advanced Directive.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident received an antibiotic to which the resident had a known allergy, resulting in the need for increased monitoring for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #40).Finding:Facility policy, Clinical Variance Reporting, revised 10/2024 states, A variance report is required when a variance occurs with medication, documentation, or other circumstances considered variances.The nurse manager or designee on the neighborhood/community will ensure that the following are completed.Physician notification.Resident #40 was admitted with diagnoses to include, but not limited to, otitis media.A review of Resident #40's clinical record revealed a physician progress note dated 3/23/26 that states, . [Resident #40] is seen. regarding ear pain . [he/she] has an allergy to amoxicillin so will use cefdinir 300mg BID x 10 days for otitis media .Further review of Resident #40's clinical record revealed the following physician orders:An order for Amoxicillin 875…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, interviews, facility policy, and the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to reflect the current needs of the resident for 2 of 27 residents reviewed for care planning (Residents #9, #40). The facility's Medication Management Policy #LTCMM-11, revised 7/24 noted IV: Procedure: A. Psychopharmacological Medication use: 9. The care plan will be developed/updated as appropriate including goals of therapy and evaluation of progress towards goals. The Facility assessment dated 2025 noted: Part 3:Services and Care Based on Residents Needs:1 Types of care that resident populations require and types of care that are provided at Glen Ridge. General care: medications - Specific Care or Practices: Awareness of any limitations of administering medications, administration of medications that residents need by route: oral, nasal, buccal, sublingual, topical, subcutaneous, rectal, intravenous (peripheral or central lines), intramuscular, inhaled (nebulizer), vaginal, ophthalmic, etc.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards by ensuring doors had wood and/or protective covering that was not gouged/splintered and/or broken creating sharp edges on 1 of 3 units(Cove Unit) and a common area for 2 of 2 environmental observations on 1 of 4 days of survey. (3/23/26)Findings:Cove Unit:1. On 3/23/26 at 10:15 a.m., a surveyor observed the small sitting room door that had a broken door protector covering that was sticking out and sharp, creating a hazardous and unsafe environment.On 3/23/26 at 10:17 a.m., in an observation and interview with a surveyor, a Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed the finding. On 3/23/26 10:27 a.m., in an interview, a surveyor discussed the finding with the Administrator. 2. On 3/23/26 10:27 a.m., a surveyor and the Administrator observed the left wooden double door in the lobby area headed to the units had a gouge/chunk missing exposing untreated wood and sharp edges, creating a hazardous and unsafe environment. At this time, in an interview with a surveyor,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #11, #82).Findings:Facility policy Obtaining and Use of Oxygen Devices, revised 7/2025 states, .Cleaning/changing of oxygen equipment. nasal cannula (nosepiece) should be detached and discarded once per week.Concentrator-particle filter on concentrator should be removed and cleaned weekly.1.On 3/23/26 at 10:43 a.m. and 3/24/26 at 2:01 p.m., a surveyor observed Resident #27's undated nasal cannula oxygen tubing connected to an oxygen concentrator next to his/her bed. The tubing was stored unbagged on top of the concentrator.On 3/25/26 at 8:29 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #11 sleeping in bed, wearing oxygen via nasal cannula tubing.A review of Resident #11's clinical record revealed the following active physician orders:An order with a start date of 1/26/26 for Oxygen (O2) at 2L/min [liters per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error when an antibiotic to which the resident had a known allergy was prescribed and administered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #40).Finding:Resident #40 was admitted with diagnoses to include, but not limited to, otitis media.A review of Resident #40's clinical record revealed a physician progress note dated 3/23/26 that states, . [Resident #40] is seen. regarding ear pain - on exam [he/she] says [his/her] left ear hurts. [he/she] also had a fever over the weekend. [he/she] has an allergy to amoxicillin so will use cefdinir 300mg BID x 10 days for otitis media .Further review of Resident #40's clinical record revealed the following physician orders:An order for Amoxicillin 875 mg-potassium clavulanate [Augmentin] 125 mg tablet (1) TABLET Oral Two Times Daily for Ten Days Starting 03/23/26.An order for Cefdinir 300 mg capsule (1) CAPSULE Oral Two Times Daily for Ten Days Starting 3/23/26.A review of Resident #40's Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a garbage storage area and in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests for 1 of 2 trash dumpsters for 2 of 4 days of survey. (3/23/26 and 3/24/26)Findings:1. On 3/23/26 at 8:15 a.m., a surveyor observed the small garbage/refuse dumpster to have the left-side slide door open and the right-side slide door missing, exposing garbage/refuse.2. On 3/24/26 at 8:07 a.m., the surveyor and a laundry staff observed the small garbage/refuse dumpster to have the left side slide door open and the right-side slide door missing, exposing garbage/refuse. At this time, the laundry staff confirmed the findings. On 3/24/2026 at 8:10 a.m., in an interview, the surveyor discussed the two findings with the Administrator.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in the area of oral hygiene for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dental care (Resident #40 and #10) and failed to follow the Self-care deficit care plan in the area of oral hygiene for 1 of 2 reviewed. (Resident #10) Findings: 1. On 1/6/25 at 10:55 a.m., observation of Resident #40 sitting in the common area. His/her teeth were coated with a thick whitish substance at the gum line. At this time, in a brief interview, he/she states staff will help when needed for brushing his/her teeth. On 1/7/25 at 10:31 a.m., observation of Resident #40 dressed, hair combed back into a ponytail and seated in a chair in the common area. His/her teeth were coated with a thick whitish substance at the gum line. On 1/7/25 at 12:46 p.m., the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) and the surveyor observed Resident #40's teeth coated with a thick whitish substance at the gum line. At this time, the DON stated she will look further into Resident #40's dental care and stated he/she does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen tours (1/6/25 and 1/7/25). Findings: 1. On 1/6/25 from 8:49 a.m. to 9:04 a.m., 2 Surveyors toured the kitchen with the Food Service Supervisor (FDS) in which the following were observed: > The walk-in freezer had built up ice on the fans and on the ceiling. > The hood frame above the grill had chipped and peeling paint. On 1/6/25 at 9:04 a.m., the above was confirmed with the FSD and the Food Service Manager (FSM) who both stated the walk-in freezer was recently serviced for the built-up ice. 2. On 1/7/25 at 8:08 a.m., during an additional tour of the kitchen, 2 surveyors and the FSD observed the following: > The dishwasher hood exhaust vent coated with thick dust and visible dust clusters. > The prewash sink had an empty rinse aid dispenser on the wall with one of the fluid lines, which enters the dishwasher, had a visibly soiled face cloth, tinged off white with brown colored edges, wrapped around the line. At this time,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, facility policy, and observations, the facility failed to maintain and implement an infection control program to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection on 2 of 4 days of survey. Findings: The Infection Control Program page 18 under Procedures for Contact Precautions indicates Staff will utilize gloves and gowns when in the patient's room and/or providing direct patient care. 1. On 1/6/25 at 10:22 a.m., a surveyor observed a contact precaution sign on Resident #22's door instructing all staff to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for contact with the patient or the patient's environment. A PPE cart was located outside the room which included gloves, gowns and instructions for staff on donning and doffing PPE. At this time, a surveyor observed a Housekeeping Staff member inside Resident #22's room cleaning the floor and wiping down objects wearing only gloves. A surveyor intervened and asked the Housekeeping Staff member if Resident #22 was on contact precautions and what should be worn. The Housekeeping Staff member stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement its Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to effectively monitor antibiotic use. This has the potential to affect all residents receiving an antibiotic. Findings: Review of the facility policy Infection Control last revised on 5/24 states; the facility will Track and trend both infection control rates and antibiotic use .Assess appropriate and safe use of antibiotics .Assess best practices through research, accessing pharmacists and other experienced or trained in antibiotic stewardship to ensure evidenced based practice for the long-term care facility. Furthermore, the role of the Infection Preventionist is to Work with the Medical Director to monitor culture report, investigate any potential clusters or outbreaks, and monitor physician use of antibiotics as deemed appropriate. On 1/8/25 at 11:30 a.m., during an interview with the Clinical Nursing Supervisor/Infection Preventionist. He discusses tracking infections residents have and what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a specialized mental health diagnosis, whose stay went beyond the expected 30 days, had been referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review Level II (PASRR) evaluation and determination (Resident #26). Finding: Clinical record review revealed Resident #26 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder. A review of Resident #26's PASRR Level I dated 8/2/24 revealed Resident #26 had a Convalescence Categorical exemption (a time-limited 30-day exemption). Resident #26's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident had been re-evaluated for a PASRR Level II determination after the Convalescent period ended. On 1/7/25 at 1:30 p.m., the Care Manager Supervisor confirmed the finding.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order with a supporting diagnosis for the use of an indwelling foley catheter and failed to ensure the physician order for the foley catheter included the size of the catheter and the size of the catheter balloon for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with urinary catheters (Resident #110). Finding: On 1/6/25 at 12:21 p.m., during an interview with Resident #110, he/she was unaware of why he/she has an indwelling foley catheter stating, he/she did not have one at home .Wish I didn't have one, they might take it out. On 1/8/25 at 7:21 a.m., during an interview, Registered Nurse #2 (RN#2) stated she was not sure why Resident #110 had a foley catheter. At this time, Certified Nursing Aide #5 (CNA #5) stated, Resident #110 has a foley catheter due to not being able to manage his/her urinal, soaking his/her bed and his/her difficulty with getting out of bed due to his/her seizures. The Surveyor asked what the medical diagnosis was for having the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in the area of personal hygiene for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Residents #2 and #49) during 2 of 4 days of survey. Findings: 1. On 10/2/22 at 9:08 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #2 sitting in a common area with food crumbs on his/her pants from breakfast. Documentation in Resident #2's Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0), dated 9/28/22: Section G-Functional Status under G0110-Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance-G and J-Personal Hygiene: was coded that Resident #2 required total assistance of 2 staff. On 10/02/22 at 11:46 a.m., a surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA) #1 escorting Resident #2 to the dining room with food crumbs still on his/her lap from breakfast. At this time, CNA #2 confirmed that Resident #2 had food crumbs/particles still on his/her lap from breakfast. 2. On 10/3/22 at 8:33 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #49 with food crumbs on both armrests of his/her wheelchair and on his/her hands and front of his/her shirt.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was updated for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Hospice. (Resident #2) Findings: On 10/4/22, Resident #2's clinical record was reviewed and indicated Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled services and was on Hospice at the time of admittance. Review of Resident #2's current care plan, dated 6/4/22, lacked evidence that it had been updated to reflect the resident was receiving Hospice services. On 10/4/22 at 11:46 a.m., during an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #2's care plan had not been updated to reflect Hospice services until 10/4/22 after surveyor intervention.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-03-26 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure written bed hold and transfer/discharge notices were provided in writing to the resident and/or their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 4 of 4 sampled residents transferred/discharged to an acute care facility (Residents #5, #17, #56, #86). Findings: 1.Documentation in Resident #5's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital on [DATE]. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written transfer/discharge and bed hold notices to the resident's representative. 2. Documentation in Resident #56's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital on [DATE]. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued a written transfer/discharge notice and bed hold notice to the resident's representative. 3. Documentation in Resident 86's clinical record revealed he/she was transferred to and acute care hospital and subsequently admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MAINEGENERAL HEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/1997
ALEXANDER, MARCIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/10/2007
BULLOCK, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/07/2024
DIEFENDERFER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
HEERSINK, DEIRDREIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2024
HOWELL, NATHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2023
LABBE TRUFANT, NICOLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
PEACHEY, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/30/2016
PELLETIER, MICHELEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/09/2023
PIZZO, GREGORYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/1989
PURINGTON, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2023
RICO, AMYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
RILEY, DORCASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2025
SCOTT, DUANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2025
SMALL, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/30/2016
TARDIFF, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/30/2016
YEAGER, COURTNEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
BRANN, TERRENCEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2015
NAAS, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/06/2017
OUELLETTE, LISAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/29/2024
RIGGS, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2014
RODRIGUE, TARSHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2020
TOMPKINS, JANELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$285K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 1%Other / private 24%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $285K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$378per resident / day
operating cost
$11,505per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$358per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maine
$13,976/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,904/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,205/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205139. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next