Gregory Wing Of St Andrews Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 39.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.73 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and sanitary conditions for 1 of 2 units([NAME] Wing), an activity office and the Laundry/kitchen areas on 3 of 3 environmental tours.1. On 8/11/25 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m., a surveyor and the Facilities Manager toured the laundry room and the [NAME] Wing hallway and observed the following findings:Laundry: - There was a ceiling tile, over the stackable dryers, that was broken and had fallen out of place. - The entire floor was dirty and heavily soiled with dirt. - There were approximately 10 cracked/broken floor tiles throughout the laundry room. - There were three stained ceiling tiles in the soiled area of the laundry room. [NAME] Wing hallway- A laundry cart had a ripped cover and also had tape on it holding some of the cover together.On 8/11/25 at 10:20 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Facilities Manager confirmed the findings.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an Interdisciplinary Meeting was held within 7 days of completed Minimum Data Set (MDS)/ Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for 3 of 14 Residents reviewed (Resident's (7, 19 and 35). 1. Review of facility policy Care Plans-Comprehensive-Preliminary dated 3/1998 states . The resident's/patient's comprehensive care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the resident's/patient's comprehensive assessment (MDS) . Review of Resident [R]7's Quarterly MDS/ARD dated 7/18/25. Review of R7's clinical record revealed the IDT was held 7/16/25 (2 days prior to MDS/ARD) completion. During an interview on 8/12/25 at 11:21 a.m., the Licensed Social Worker (LSW) stated that she is supposed to schedule IDTs within 7 days of the MDS /ARD date. At this time LSW confirmed R7's IDT was held 2 days prior to MDS/ARD completion date. 2. Review of Resident (R) 35's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Assessment was completed on 7/30/25. Further review of the clinical record lacked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident [R] 6). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 2 residents receiving oxygen therapy (R1) and failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of the assessment and monitoring of the resident's respiratory condition for 2 of 2 residents receiving oxygen therapy (R1, R6). 1. On 8/11/25 at 9:09 a.m. and 11:22 a.m., R1 was observed wearing oxygen (O2) via a nasal cannula (NC) with the concentrator flow rate set at 1.5 liters per minute (L/min). On 8/12/25 at 9:34 a.m. during a follow-up observation, Resident #1 was wearing oxygen via nasal cannula with the concentrator flow rate set at 1L/min. Review of R1's clinical record revealed the following orders: -order with a start date of 6/5/25 for Oxygen 2L/min via NC PRN [as needed] for dyspnea [shortness of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, the facility's Storage - Food and Non Food Items policy, the facility's Sanitation-Warewashing-Mechanical/Manual Cleaning/Sanitizing policy, and the facility's Dish machine Temperature and Cleaning Records, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a grease trap cover, floor drain covers and the walk-in freezer; failed to ensure kitchen staff wore appropriate hair coverings; failed to ensure foods were properly dated, labeled and/or discarded past the manufacturer's best used by date for 1 of 1 kitchen tour.(8/11/25)The facility's Sanitation-Ware washing-Mechanical/Manual Cleaning/Sanitizing policy effective date: 04/20/12 noted: Procedure: d) Check temperatures. Record daily the wear washing machines temperatures of both the wash and the rinse cycles on the dishwasher temperature record form. Temperatures shall be maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.The facility's Storage - Food and Non Food Items…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly disposed of and contained to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests for 3 of 3 days of survey (8/11/25, 8/12/25 and 8/13/25).1. On 8/11/25 at 8:30 a.m., two surveyors observed one of two dumpsters with the front right lid open exposing trash. There was also trash on the ground around the two dumpsters. Additionally, two surveyors observed a trash storage area, outside the maintenance shop area, that had trash piled in and on 3 large, uncovered trash receptacles. On 8/11/2025 at 9:12 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator confirmed the finding. 2. On 8/11/25 at 8:30 a.m., a surveyor and the Facilities Manager observation of trash storage area outside the maintenance shop area. 1 of 3 large, uncovered trash receptacles had trash in it. At this time, in an interview with a surveyor, the Facilities Manager confirmed that the staff puts trash in the bins daily to take to the dumpsters at the end of the day and the bins are not covered. 3. On 8/12/25 at 8:15 a.m., a surveyor and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to care for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #19 (R19).R19 was admitted in February 2025. Review of R19's clinical record lacked evidence that a baseline care plan, including goals and interventions, was developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission. On 8/12/25 at 4:00 p.m. during an interview, the Nurse Manager reviewed R19's baseline care plan and confirmed it was not developed and implemented until 4 days after admission.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was developed in the area of oxygen use for 1of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident [R] 1).On 8/11/2025 at 9:09 a.m. and 8/12/25 at 9:00 a.m., R1 was observed wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula.Review of R1's clinical record indicated he/she has diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and aspiration pneumonia. Review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 6/9/25, indicated oxygen therapy while a resident. Review of R1's physician orders revealed the following:-order with a start date of 6/5/25 for Oxygen 2L/min [2 liters per minute] via NC [nasal cannula] PRN [as needed] for dyspnea [shortness of breath], comfort, and/or 02 [oxygen] sat [saturation] below 90% .-order with a start date of 8/11/25 for Oxygen 2L/min via NC every shift for dyspnea, comfort.Review of R1's care plan lacked evidence that goals/interventions for oxygen were implemented until after the start of the survey (8/11/25).On 8/12/2025 at 4:00 p.m. during an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of performance evaluations and interviews, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations timely, at least once every 12 months, for 2 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's 1 & 2).1.Review of CNA1's 2024 Annual Performance Appraisal initiated by Nurse Manager on 10/10/24 states Impersonation Mode You are currently impersonating another user. To stop impersonating, click on the user menu and select Stop Impersonating. I understand that my electronic signature carries the same legal weight and authority as my written signature. Name [CNA1] date 8/12/25. sign: is blank. This evaluation lacks evidence that it was reviewed/or signed by CNA1.During an interview on 8/13/25 at 10:55 a.m., CNA1 reviewed 2024 Annual Performance Appraisal dated 8/12/24 and stated she did not receive or sign an evaluation yesterday (8/12/25), and she was working all day and never went onto a computer all day long.2. Review of CNA2's 2024 Annual Performance Appraisal initiated by Nurse Manager on 10/28/24 states . I understand that my electronic signature carries the same legal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) employee education reviews and interview, the facility failed to monitor and ensure that a CNA attended the required 12 hours of annual in-service education, for 1 of 5 randomly selected CNA's employed greater than 1 year. (CNA1).Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) was hired on 4/11/16.CNA1 's yearly Inservice education records from 4/11/24 through 4/11/25 state she received 7.09 hours of Inservice hour education and not the required 12 hours. During a review of CNA1's in-service hours on 8/13/25 at 11:03 a.m., Nurse Manager confirming CNA1 did not receive the required 12 hours of in-service education.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespread
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, if any, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 37 of 37 beds. Findings: On 5/14/24 at 11:42 a.m., a surveyor met with the Director of Facilities and asked for the bed gap measurements and side rail gap measurement documentation. The Director of Facilities stated that he had never heard of those before and he would check with the other maintenance men. He came back and stated that they had never heard of them either. At this time, the Director of Facilities confirmed that the facility had never completed bed gap measurements and/or side rail gap measurements at the facility for any of the resident's beds. On 5/14/24 at 11:50 a.m., in an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Facilities, the Administrator stated that she had never heard of bed gap measurements or side rail gap measurements. At this time, the Administrator confirmed that the facility had never completed bed gap measurements and/or side rail gap…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 65 rows in the source record cover these 36 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in ME