No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mid Coast Senior Health Center

58 Baribeau Drive, Brunswick, ME 04011 · Non profit - Corporation · 42 certified beds · (207) 373-3600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (207) 373-3600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0604) — cited Aug 2025
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(207) 373-3635 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
35 Elm St · (207) 729-1604 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Hannaford1.1 mi
35 Elm St · (207) 725-6683 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.5%24.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%5.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%2.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.0%11.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.3%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.7%25.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.5%17.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.3%29.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.8%20.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.9%74.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.8%20.8%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.6%16.1%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.88U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.47hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.34hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.88 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.2%CMS range 60.7–75.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.5%CMS range 6.1–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 2.6–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.03
RN hours/ resident / day
0.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.44
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.53
RN hoursweekends
57.4%
Total nursing turnover
52.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 40.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.23 to 1.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-06)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies ensuring staff wear required hair restraints, maintain the industrial mixer in a clean and sanitary condition and ensure food was not expired, outdated, unlabeled, or moldy for 1 of 3 kitchen tours observed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the dishwashing machine maintained the proper temperature range necessary for effective cleaning and sanitizing for 7 of 7 temperature logs reviewed. These failures had the potential to affect all residents who consume facility prepared food. The facilities policy Infection Prevention - Kitchen requires that all Food Service staff comply with that all dishwashing staff comply with personal hygiene requirements, including wearing a hair and beard restraint and that all kitchen equipment including mixers be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.On 8/4/25 from 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., during a kitchen tour with the Food Service Director, the following findings were observed: A male dishwasher with facial hair and no hair restraint. Dried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical restraint for 1of 4 residents observed wearing wheelchair seatbelts. In addition, the facility failed to follow its own policy titled Physical Restraints/Side Rails in the area of physical restraints. (Resident #22)On 8/5/25 a surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Physical Restraints/Side Rails last reviewed/revised 9/2020 which stated: A physical restraint is any manual method, physical or mechanical device/equipment or material that limits a resident's freedom of movement and cannot be removed intentionally by the resident in the same manner as it was applied by staffUnder Section IV Procedure:1. An RN will complete a nursing assessment which includes resident behavior patterns, diagnoses that explain behaviors, resident safety needs and medications.2. The provider must be included in all discussions regarding the potential use of restraints.3. Only an RN or provider are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remained free from hazards with regards to chemicals for 3 of 3 survey days.A surveyor reviewed the Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for the following chemicals and found the GHS (Global Harmonized System) information for Hazard class and category. A Category 1 in this system indicates the highest level of hazard for that category. SDS for Might Bowl 64GHS US Classification: Serious eye Damage/eye irritation Category 1, Skin sensitization, category 1 SDS for GC2030 GHS US Classification: Skin corrosion/irritation Category 1A, Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 1, Skin sensitization, Category 1 SDS for Professional LYSOL toilet bowl cleaner - Complete clean powerGHS US Classification: Corrosive to metals - Category 1, Acute Toxicity (oral) Category 4, Skin Corrosion Category 1, Serious Eye Damage - Category 1.On 8/4/25 at 10:37 a.m. A surveyor observed the spa room and the shower room on Mere Point Unit and found an unlocked cupboard in the spa room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to update and/or implement goals and interventions for 2 of 14 care plans reviewed. (Resident's #12 and #29). Findings: Review of facility policy Comprehensive Resident Care Plan undated states It is the policy of Mid Coast Senior Health Center to develop, implement and evaluate a comprehensive care plan for each resident based on a comprehensive assessment of the residents needs . will be developed for each resident to include measurable objectives and timetables based on the Resident Assessment Protocols triggered by the MDS and other assessments . will reflect intermediate steps for each objective if identification of those steps will enhance the resident's ability to meet his/her objectives .will be developed 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment by the interdisciplinary team will be reviewed and updated periodically and as the resident's condition dictates . 1. Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] and has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for the floor stand mixer, floor stand fan, and the small countertop mixer. Freezer #7 contained unlabeled and undated items for 2 of 2 observations. Additionally, the dry storage room floor was not maintained in clean and sanitary manner, there is no temperature log for the dish machine, and the Mere Point Unit Freezer contained the ice scoop in with the ice for 1 of 3 days of survey. Findings: On 6/10/24 at 8:10 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen with the cook and again on 6/12/24 at 8:00 a.m., during a kitchen tour with the Director of Facilities Operations, the following findings were observed and confirmed: 1- Observed that the facility lacks a log for the dish machine. The cook stated, we are supposed to have a log for that, but I do not know where it is. In an interview, the Kitchen Coordinator and a Diet Aide, that run the dish machine, both stated in the instructions for running the dish machine that they must observe the temperature gauge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent cross contamination and/or development of infection by maintaining a safe and sanitary environment related to urinary collection devices for 3 of 3 days of survey on 2 of 3 units (100 and 200 Units). Findings: Observations of 100 Unit revealed the following: -On 6/10/24 at 9:48 a.m., and 6/11/24 at 7:25 a.m., observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom revealed uncovered commode bucket on floor, available for use. -On 6/10/24 at 9:25 a.m., observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom revealed uncovered commode bucket on the floor with bed pan stored inside, available for use. Observations of 200 unit revealed the following: -On 6/11/24 at 8:14 a.m. and 3:09 p.m., and on 6/12/24 at 8:04 a.m., observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom revealed an uncovered commode bucket on bathroom floor, available for use. - On 6/11/24 at 8:21 a.m., and 3:13 p.m., observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary and comfortable interior on 2 of 3 units observed (100 and 200 units). Findings: During a facility tour on 6/12/24 between 8:31 a.m. and 8:55 a.m , the Director of Operations confirmed the following: 100 Unit the following was observed: -room [ROOM NUMBER] the bathroom had dead bugs/debis in the light fixture -room [ROOM NUMBER] entrance was missing the threshold -room [ROOM NUMBER] had approximately 4 feet section of baseborad trim missing left of the window 200 Unit the following was observed: -room [ROOM NUMBER] the sink was dripping and plugged up causeing pooling water in the sink. -room [ROOM NUMBER] the sink had a steady leak.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record reviews and interview the facility failed to provide a written Notice of Transfer or Discharge to resident and/or resident representatives for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #28). In addition, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of hospital transfers for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident's #28 and #2). Findings: Review of facility policy Transfer and Discharge Policy undated, states .Notice of discharge shall be provided to the resident and resident representative: when a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility, notice of the transfer shall be provided to the resident and resident representative as soon as practicable, A list of resident who transferred out for the facility is provided to the state ombudsman on a monthly basis . 1. Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stage 3 chronic kidney disease. On 6/11/24 Resident #28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily cost of care, to a resident, known family member or legal representative for 1 of 6 sampled residents who had been transferred to the hospital (Residents #28). Finding: Review of facility policy Resident Bed Hold Policy for Hospitalizations undated, states Prior to and upon a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and/or the resident representatives that explains in detail: the rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds, The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan, the facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid resident), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (Medicaid residents). Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stage 3 chronic kidney disease. On 6/11/24 Resident #28 was transferred to an acute care hospital for evaluation and was subsequently admitted . Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the problems, interventions, and initial goals needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 4 of 14 residents that were reviewed for new admissions. (#190, #196, #2 and #28) Findings: 1. Resident #190 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The hospital discharge summary included information that the resident was admitted with diagnosis of COVID-19, Atrial flutter requiring anticoagulant medication and a Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) on 5/24/24 which required Epicardial pacing wires. The discharge instructions stated, Epicardial pacing wires: prepped and cut on day of discharge. Instructions: you had temporary epicardial pacing wires placed during surgery and utilized in the post-operative period. These rest on the surface of your heart and allowed us to temporarily control your heart rate. These wires exited the skin just…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for the wall mounted fan over the dish area, standing fan just outside the dish area, and ceiling. Additionally, the walk-in freezer floor was not maintained in clean and sanitary manner, and the reach-in refrigerator had uncovered, undated, and unlabeled food; the reach-in freezer had open bags of food; and all temperature logs were lacking complete documentation of temperature tracking, all of which has the ability to affect all residents in the facility. Findings: On 1/30/2024 at 8:05a.m. during a tour of the kitchen with morning cook the following was observed: 1. Two fans, one above the dish area and the other outside the dish area heavily soiled with dirt and debris. 2. Uncovered, unlabeled, and undated food in the reach-in refrigerator. 3. Open bag of frozen food in the reach-in freezer. 4. Moderate to heavy amounts of dirt and hanging from ceiling above clean dish area. 5. All current temperature logs lacking documentation for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-06-12 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form was provided at least two days prior to end of Skilled services for 1 of 3 residents whose Medicare Part A Skilled services were discontinued (Residents #26). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) form 10055, which included appeal rights and liability of payment was provided at least two days prior to a resident's last covered day for 2 of 3 residents whose Medicare Part A services were discontinued and remained in the facility (#26 and #32). Findings: 1. Resident #26's NOMNC indicated that the resident's Medicare Part A services would end on 1/25/24 and was signed by residents Guardian on 1/24/24, one day prior to end of skilled services. The medical record lacked evidence that Resident #28's legal guardian was provided a SNFABN when the Medicare A coverage for skilled services was discontinued. The resident remained living in the facility. 2. Resident #32's Medicare Part A coverage for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MAINEHEALTHOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2021
MAINEHEALTH SERVICESOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2021
BURKE, LENORAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
CHATALBASH, HANNAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DARCY, LARISSAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DECK, MARCUS MAURICE SEBASTIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
FRIZZLE, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2019
HUTCHINSON, GLENNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2005
HUTCHINSON, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
JOHNSON, STEMPLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
KNIGHT, MARGOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
LITTLE, JENNYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MADAIO, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MICKEY, AILEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MONTEGUT, ALAINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
MORAN, ADRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
MORRELL-ROONEY, SANDRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2007
SPANN, ROWENAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
BOWE, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
ELKINS, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2022
HASAN, OMARIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
HUNTER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/26/2025
LOOKE, LORIMANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2026
MCGLAUFLIN, BRUCEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
MORGENSTERN, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/26/2022
MUELLER, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
ORLANDO, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2015
PERRY, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/04/2019
SHANKLIN, HEATHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/26/2025
DARLING, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DENYER, ALLYSONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
MORSE, STACEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PATSTONE, ANDREAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2024
SLUDER, RACHELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
SMITH, TERESAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/18/2020
TUTT, DAWNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
YOUNG, SHARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 72 rows in the source record cover these 37 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 11%Medicare 5%Other / private 84%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$420per resident / day
operating cost
$12,775per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$355per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maine
$13,976/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,904/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,205/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205163. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next