Windward Gardens
105 Mechanic Street, Camden, ME 04843 · For profit - Corporation · 73 certified beds · (207) 236-4197 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.2% | 24.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.4% | 5.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 2.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 14.4% | 11.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.4% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.5% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.6% | 17.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.6% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 37.3% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.0% | 20.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.1% | 74.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.0% | 20.8% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.2% | 16.1% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.01 | 1.45 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.96 | 2.01 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 165 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.2%CMS range 53.8–69.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.6–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 82.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 4.8–15.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 64.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.14 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.24 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
79 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 1 of 4 units observed during a complaint investigation (North Wind unit).Findings:On 3/13/26, the Division of Licensing and Certification received a complaint that states .there are dirty washcloths in client's [resident's] room after staff washed client off.On 3/31/26 at 4:52 p.m. during a telephone interview, the complainant indicated that staff leave soiled washcloths sitting on the resident's shelves.On 4/1/26 from 10:10-10:26 a.m., during the onsite investigation, a surveyor conducted a tour of the North Wind unit and observed the following:In resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-2, orange peels and various food debris were on the floor next to and underneath the resident's bed.In Resident #2's room, the bathroom trash can was overflowing with debris and used exam gloves, and an unbagged soiled washcloth were on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls during a complaint investigation (Resident #1).Finding:Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses to include but not limited to atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation (a blood thinner medication).A review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an active physician order for Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 MG (Apixaban) Give 1 Tablet by mouth two times a day .Review of Resident #1's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that Resident #1 received his/her scheduled doses of Eliquis two times a day from March 1-18, 2026.Further review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed an SBAR (Situation, Background, Appearance, Review, and Notify) Communication Form and Progress Note, dated 3/12/26 and 3/17/26, used when notifying the physician of a resident's change in condition. The form states, Before calling MD [Medical Doctor]/NP [Nurse Practitioner]/ PA [Physician Assistant]: Evaluate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure neurological [neuro] checks were completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls during a complaint investigation (Resident #1).Findings:Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses to include dementia and history of falls. Review of fall Incident Report dated 12/12/25 at 6:30 a.m., states Incident Location: Residents Room. Patient was found in [his/her] room laying on [his/her] right side on the floor. Patient states I got up and slid on the floor. Patient assessed and found to have no injuries . Initial Neuro checks complete and patient passed. the medical record lacked evidence that neuro checks were completed after this unwitnessed fall.Review of fall Incident Report dated 12/16/25 13:35 (1:35 p.m.) states Incident location: Hallway. The resident had fallen to the floor and was witnessed by the Nurse while rendering care to another patient near the hallway of the unit entrance door. He landed on his left arm and didn't hit his head. No injuries and pain noted. ROM (range of motion) and vital signs checked. All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 4 of 4 wings (North Wind, Spring Gardens, Windward Center and Penobscot House) for 1 of 1 facility tours.(12/4/25)Findings:On 12/4/25 from 8:50 a.m. to 9:20 a.m., an Environmental tour was completed with the Senior Maintenance Director, the Administrator, and the Housekeeping/Laundry District Manager in which the following findings were discussed and/or observed: Spring Garden - Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom had an unlabeled dirty urinal on the back of the toilet. There were three cracked/broken floor tiles across from the sink. The bathroom door had gouged/chipped treated wood exposing untreated wood. The wall across from the toilet had chipped/[NAME] paint creating an uncleanable surface. The sink countertop had chipped/missing edge laminate and was also stained.- Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice to a resident and their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 3 of 3 sampled residents transferred/discharged to an acute care facility. (Residents #9, and #11). In addition, the facility failed to ensure that information was communicated to the Assisted Living Facility (ALF) to ensure a safe and effective transition of care when the facility failed to notify the ALF of a date before a resident was discharge and signed physician orders were not sent to the ALF until the day after discharge, for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #80 [R80]). Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident 9's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital on 9/8/25 and 9/16/25. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility issued written transfer/discharge notices and bed hold notices to the resident and/or legal representative for both transfers. On 12/3/25 at 12:09 a.m., in an interview with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to care for 5 of 16 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Residents #1 [R1], R33, R76, R78, R2 )Findings: 1.Resident #33 was recently admitted to the facility and has diagnoses to include alcohol abuse. Review of Resident #33 baseline care plan lacked evidence that goals and interventions were put into place for alcohol abuse During an interview on 12/4/25 at 1:12 p.m., confirmed with Market Lead Clinical Specialist confirmed the above. 2.R2 was recently admitted to the facility with multiple mental health diagnoses that included Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder, Bipolar, anxiety, and depression as well as a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). A review of R2's baseline care plan lacked evidence that goals and interventions were put into place with 48 hours of admission.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist identified an irregularity for a scheduled II medication and failed to ensure that the physician responded to a pharmacist recommendation timely for 2of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident [R2], R 35). Findings: The facility's policy, Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, revised 1/24, indicated the following: The Medication Regimen Review (MRR) includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen and medical chart of each resident at least monthly to appropriately monitor the medication regimen and ensure that the medications each resident receives are clinically indicated. Identification of irregularities may occur by the consultant pharmacist utilizing a variety of sources including medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and unlabeled medications were removed from the supply available for resident use for 1 of 4 medication carts observed (Penobscot Unit) for 1 of 4 days of survey. Furthermore, the facility failed to adequately ensure medications and biologics were monitored in 4 of 4 refrigerators observed for 3 of 3 months of medication refrigerator logs reviewed.Findngs:1. On 12/3/25 at 12:45 p.m., observation of Penobscot Unit medication cart with LPN #1 (Licensed Practical Nurse) revealed expired and unlabeled medication listed below:-Magnesium Oxide 400mg tablets expired on 11/2025.-Calcium 600 and DS tablets expired on 7/2025.-Acidophilus Probiotic tablets expired on 10/2025.-Lantus Insulin pen containing a little over 220 Units with no resident identifier and no open date.-Humalog Kiwi pen with no open date.On 12/3/25 at 1:35 p.m., the above information was confirmed with the Facility Administrator.2. On 12/3/25 at 2:00 p.m., observation of the Spring Garden medication storage room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility's Food Storage: Dry Goods policy/procedure, the facility's Food Storage: Cold Foods policy/procedure and the facility's Refrigerated/Frozen Storage policy/procedure, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for fans, floors, a food mixer, a food processor, and metal shelving; failed to ensure kitchen staff with facial hair wore facial protection; failed to ensure foods were dated/labeled and/or secured shut in the reach in a walk-in refrigerator, a walk-in freezer, a dry storage room and in kitchen work areas; and failed to ensure the ice machine was properly installed to prevent backflow as required by the Maine State Plumbing Code requirements to prevent food contamination for 1 of 1 kitchen tour. (12/1/25)Findings: The facility's Food Storage: Dry Goods policy/procedure, revised 2/2023 noted:5. All packaged and canned foods items will be kept clean, dry, and properly sealed.6. Storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and date marked as appropriate. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 2 of 16 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #2 [R2], R35).Findings: 1.Review of Resident #35's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) effective November 2025 revealed the following: -Diabetic foot check MAR/TAR lacked evidence this was completed/refused on 10/14/25 Does the patient need to have the Head of Bed elevated to avoid shortness of breath while lying flat? Every day and night shift: MAR/TAR lacked evidence this was completed/refused during night shift of 10/14/25. - Encourage deep breathing when awake every shift. every shift for Cough. MAR/TAR lacked evidence this was completed/refused on night shift on 10/14/25 - Resident free from side effects of psychotherapeutic medications?(if no, document side effects in PN) every day and night shift. MAR/TAR lacked evidence of this was completed/refused during the night shift on 10/14/25 Review of Resident #35's GG-Eating for November 2025 lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 69 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility procedure, the facility failed to follow their own Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) procedure for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #1 [R1]) and failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections related to personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 4 units observed (Windward). Findings: 1 Facility Procedure Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 5/1/25 states, .Post the appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) sign on the patient's room door. Personal protective equipment (PPE) should be readily accessible and located outside of the patient's room. perform hand hygiene upon exiting the room. The procedure also states, Follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] guidance per table below . The table indicates gown and gloves are required PPE during urinary catheter care and that .Face protection may also be needed if performing activity with risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, the facility failed to designate a qualified staff member to function as the Infection Preventionist who works at least part time and who is responsible for the facility's Infection Control Program since September 2025. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings: On 12/4/25 at 7:49 a.m., during an interview with 2 surveyors, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that she had completed the Infection Preventionist (IP) Training and was the IP until September, when she took the role of DON and had worked full time in the role of DON since then. Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist (LPN/IP) stated she was hired as the Infection Preventionist and currently is working 20 hours a week in that role, in addition to working the floor as a Charge Nurse. The Market Lead Clinical Specialist stated that part time is considered 20 hours a week. When a surveyor asked if LPN/IP had completed the training for the role of IP, LPN/IP stated that she was on module 12 for training and had not completed the training yet. The surveyors confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for an as needed (PRN) anti-psychotic contained a duration/stop date and failed to ensure the physician evaluated a resident and wrote a new physician order to renew the PRN anti-psychotic medication every 14 days, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #10 [R10]). Finding: The facility's policy, Medication Management, revised 1/25, indicated that PRN orders for anti-psychotic drugs are limited to 14 days and cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluates the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. On 12/3/25, R10's clinical record was reviewed and included a physician order, dated 10/9/25, for Haloperidol, an anti-psychotic medication, to administer 2 tablets of 0.5 milligrams (mg) every 8 hours as needed and did not have a stop date. On 12/2/25 at 12:07 p.m., during an interview with the Market Lead Clinical Specialist, a surveyor confirmed this finding.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Agency after potential abuse concerns were identified, failed to investigate allegations of potential abuse, and failed to ensure that the facility's investigation was sent to the State Agency within 5 business days of the incident for 1 of 1 incident reviewed for abuse.Findings:Facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition states Immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, the Administrator or Designee will preform the following.Report allegations to the appropriate state and local authority(s) involving neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment (including injuries of unknown source), suspected criminal activity, and misappropriation of patient property not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the event results in serious bodily injury.Initiate an investigation within 24 hours of an allegation of abuse that focuses on: whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extent.The investigation will be thoroughly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 was coded accurately to indicate that a resident had a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #2 [R2]).Finding:On 12/2/25, R2's clinical record was reviewed and included a PASRR Level II uploaded the day of admission in the documents section of the electronic record. R2's admission MDS 3.0, dated 5/27/25 under Section A1500, was coded as NO for the question: Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? On 12/2/25 at 9:30 a.m., during an interview with the MDS Registered Nurse, a surveyor confirmed this finding.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II determination outcome into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 2 sampled resident (Resident #2 [R2]). Findings:On 12/2/25, R2's clinical record was reviewed and included a Notice of PASRR Level II outcome, dated 4/22/24, that indicated R2 qualified for Level II services due to serious mental health diagnoses that included bipolar disorder and anxiety. The PASRR Outcome Notice of Nursing Facility Approval indicated that R2 was to receive specialized services while at the nursing home that included ongoing psychiatric services by a psychiatrist to evaluate response and effectiveness of psychotropic medications on target symptoms, modify medication orders, and to evaluate ongoing need for additional behavioral health services. In addition, R2 was to receive individual therapy by a licensed behavioral health professional for ongoing counseling services. On 12/2/25 at 9:07 a.m., the Licensed Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update a care plan with goals and interventions after a resident obtained a leg fracture for 1 of 11 complaints reviewed during an annual survey (Resident #35).Findings:Resident #35 was admitted in 9/23 and had diagnoses to include dementia with psychotic disturbance and anxiety.Review of Resident #35's clinical record revealed he/she sustained a left leg fracture around 10/20/25.Review of Resident 35's care plan last reviewed 8/7/25 lacked evidence that goals and interventions were put into place after left leg fracture sustained [approximately]10/20/25.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 10:25 a.m., the above was discussed with Consulting Administrator-Maine
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a care plan was accurately revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident #37)Findings:Resident #37 was admitted in June of 2025 with a Gastrostomy Tube (G-Tube). A review of his/her clinical record shows the removal of his/her G-Tube on 9/18/2025. Further review of the clinical record shows a care plan meeting taking place on 9/23/25. Review of Resident #37's care plan does not reflect the removal of his/her G-Tube.On 12/4/25 at 1:30 p.m., During an interview with the Market Lead Clinical Specialist, the above information was confirmed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident #37)Findings:Review of Resident #37 clinical record shows physician orders to have All meals DIRECTLY SUPERVISED. Small bites and sips. Pt (patient) to be bolt upright in chair. Please stay up 30-45 mins (minutes) after meals. Discontinue intake if pt begins to cough significantly, ordered on 6/12/25. On 12/1/25 at 9:05 a.m., observation of Resident #37 being served breakfast by CNA #2 (Certified Nursing Assistant). The surveyor then witnessed CNA #2 leaving the dining room for approximately 30 seconds. At 9:10 a.m. CNA #2 was then observed leaving the dining room with no additional staff present.On 12/1/25 at 12:43 p.m., observation of Resident #37 being served lunch by CNA #2, who then left the resident in an unattended dining room from 12:43 p.m. to 12:45 p.m During this time the surveyor observed Resident #37 take 2 bites of cake. At 12:45 p.m. to 12:50 p.m., the surveyor observed RN #1 (Registered Nurse), RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information on a daily basis for 1 of 4 days of survey (12/1/25).Finding:On 12/1/25 at 7:30 a.m., upon entry to the facility, 2 surveyors observed posted staffing sheets that were dated Wednesday, 11/26/25; Thursday, 11/27/25; and Friday 11/28/25.On 12/4/25 at 2:30 p.m. the above finding was discussed with the Administrator, Market Clinical President, and Market Clinical Lead during the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for food choices (Resident #78 [R78]).Finding:On 12/1/25 at 8:48 a.m. a surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant #2 (CNA2) deliver R78's breakfast tray, consisting of a main entree of pancakes. R78 asked if the pancakes were made without milk. CNA2 stated she was not sure and would have to find out, then left R78's room. At 8:54 a.m., CNA2 returned and stated an alternative entree would be sent. At this time, during an interview, R78 stated that he/she has a dairy allergy and has had to ask at every meal since he/she was admitted if the meal was prepared according to his/her allergy needs. Surveyor review of R78's breakfast tray meal ticket, indicated Allergies: Lactose, bell pepper, Pear, Green/Red Peppers and allergic to cayene [cayenne] Further review of the ticket states, .Pancakes-2 .2% Milk- 8 Oz.A review of R78's clinical record revealed a physician order for Regular/Liberalized diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to follow provider orders for wound care and failed to follow the facilities Skin Integrity and Wound Management policy for 1 of 2 Residents reviewed for pressure ulcer management. (Resident #310) Findings: The facilities Skin Integrity and Wound Management policy revised 5/1/25 states under Practice Standards, the Licensed nurse will: Evaluate any reported or suspected skin changes or wounds. Document newly identified skin/wound findings and the 24-hour report. Perform and document skin inspections on all newly admitted /readmitted patients weekly thereafter and with any significant change of condition. Complete wound evaluation upon admission/readmission, new in-house acquired, weekly, within unanticipated decline in wounds . Perform daily monitoring of wounds or dressings for presence of complications or declines. Document daily monitoring of ulcer/wound site with or without dressing. Monitor: signs of decline in would status. On 6/10/25, Adult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and Payroll Based Journal Report (PPJ), the facility failed to ensure it was sufficiently staffed on weekends for 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (10/1/24 through 12/31/24/ [39 days]). Findings: Review of Center for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS)PPJ Report revealed the facility triggered for low weekend staffing during the first quarter (10/1/24 through 12/31/24). During a review of first quarter weekend staffing with Administrator and Scheduler on 4/17/25 at 12:27 p.m., the Administrator confirmed the facility was not adequately staffed for 32 of 39 days reviewed.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 4 of 4 wings (North Wind, Spring Gardens, Windward Center and Penobscot House), the laundry room and a hallway for 2 of 2 facility tours. Findings: 1. On 4/14/25 at 9:05 a.m., a surveyor and the Administrator observed a large open top, wheeled garbage bin outside the facility with trash in it. At this time, the Administrator confirmed the trash storage bin didn't have a cover and the trash was not maintained in a condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. 2. On 4/17/25 from 8:10 a.m. to 8:45 a.m., an Environmental tour was conducted with the Senior Maintenance Director and the Administrator in which the following findings were observed and discussed: Support Service Hallway > The hallway had 2 ceiling tiles that had brown stains on them. Laundry Room > An open window by a washing machine had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on care plan review, observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide a resident with a continuous resident centered activities program. This failure has the potential to affect all residents that would normally participate in activities. Findings: Review of facility policy Recreation Participation Record dated 8/7/23 states Recreation Participation Records: are maintained monthly; Document each person's involvement and response in specific opportunities/experiences in accordance with the person's preferences, interest, routines, and plan of care. Independent, individual, and group recreation participation will be documented on the participation record. the Current participation record will be maintained daily, organized, and easily accessible . 1. Resident #13(R13) was admitted in the fall of 2022 and has diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder, major depression and is considered bedbound and reliant on staff for activities of daily living. Review of annual Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assess and monitor a resident after a fall, and failed to follow their own Fall management and Neurological evaluation policies and procedure by obtaining neurological assessments a resident who has an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident #18). In addition, the facility failed to ensure a resident received wound care/orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident #37). Findings: 1. On 3/16/25 Resident #18 had an unwitnessed fall and was found lying on the floor. The post fall neurological evaluation flow sheet lacked continued neurological assessments with only 3 of the 9 shifts completed for the 72 hour monitoring. On 3/22/25 Resident #18 had an unwitnessed fall and was found on the bathroom floor. The nurses note dated 3/22/25 at 5 a.m., stated, per patient he/she hit the post auricular area [behind the ear] on the right, no c/o (complaint) pain at this time, small raised bump on the right post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards by ensuring room, closet and bathroom doors had laminate that was not gouged and splintered creating sharp edges on 2 of 4 units(North Wind and Windward Center) for 2 of 2 environmental tours (4/14/25 and 4/16/25). In addition, the facility failed to store oxygen tanks securely for 1 of 4 days. Findings: 1. On 4/14/25 at 8:10 a.m., 3 surveyors observed the following chemicals in the unlocked office on the Administrative wing which residents had access to. The Administrative unit is separated from the Windward Center unit by unlocked double doors that residents can access and get through. On 4/14/25, Resident #51 was observed on the administrative unit by a surveyor. - Poopsy [NAME] Pre-Toilet Spray/ 2 ounces bottle - Febreze Air Freshener/ 8.8-ounce bottle - Purell Hand Sanitizer/ 20-ounce bottle The Safety Data Sheet for Poopsy [NAME] Pre-Toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review of the Food Storage policy (dated 2013), the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a hood system, a fan, ceiling lights, ceiling tiles, ceiling vents, floors, a chemical hose, a food slicer and an exit door. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that foods in the walk-in freezer were sealed, dated and labeled. Findings: On 4/14/25 from 8:15 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., during an initial kitchen tour, the following findings were observed and discussed with the Head [NAME] and Kitchen aide: > The hood over the dish washing machine was dusty and had rust build-up in it. > The dish room had a wall mounted fan, a ceiling vent and an entire ceiling grid system that was dusty/dirty. > There were 2 ceiling lights in the dish room that had dirt/debris in the lenses. > The floor in front of the dish machine had an approximately 2-foot by 2-foot section of laminate missing which exposed untreated cement. > The 3-bay pot sink had a long chemical hose hanging down inside the center bay. > The kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for palliative care/hospice (Resident #308), falls for 1 of 1 (Resident #258), and weights/catheter care and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) documentation for 1 of 9 resident's reviewed for a complaint (Resident #37). Findings: 1. Resident #308 was recently admitted with diagnoses to include severe protein calorie malnutrition and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #308's hospital discharge summary revealed, .Specialist appointment .Palliative care in 2 weeks . Review of Resident #308's clinical record revealed the following physician progress notes: -progress note, dated [DATE] states, . has been having weight loss and decreased appetite .A palliative care consult was obtained .determined with [his/her] son that [he/she] would be evaluated for possible Hospice therapy .Long conversation with family and will proceed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was notified timely of a significant change and/or incident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #56). Finding: On 2/26/25 the Division of Licensing and Certification received a complaint that after a resident obtained a fall, the family was not notified. On 4/17/25, review of Resident #59's medical record contained an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting dated 1/23/25 at 12:10 p.m., which stated, family was updated about the recent unwitnessed fall which happened night of 01/22/25. The family mentioned that they were not informed of the fall from last night. Review of the nursing documentation dated 1/22/25 at 7:37 p.m. stated, Called to patient room for fall in the bathroom, observed patient lying on the floor on [his/her] back with pants down below the waist, patient stated [he/she] was going to the bathroom and slipped and fell, no obvious bone deformities, no redness or bruising at this time, c/o low back pain 3/10. Further review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents reviewed with a specialized mental health diagnosis, whose stay went beyond the expected 30 days, had been referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review Level II (PASRR) evaluation and determination (Resident #18). Finding: 1. Resident #18 was re-admitted to the facility in May 2024 with diagnoses of generalized anxiety and bipolar disorder. Resident #18's clinical record contained a PASRR Level I Screen, dated 5/22/24, and indicated the screen was for a change in condition and that Resident #18 would reside in the facility for permanent placement (LTC) [Long Term Care]. The clinical record lacked evidence to indicate that the PASRR Level I was forwarded to the State Mental Health Authority to determine if a PASRR Level II evaluation and determination was needed. On 4/15/25 at 11:15 a.m. the above findings were discussed with the Market Clinical Advisor.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review, revise and update a care plan for a newly discovered pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer (Resident #1 [R1]). Finding: On 2/19/25, R1's clinical record was reviewed. Documentation indicated that R1 had an admission care plan (dated 12/19/24) for at risk of skin breakdown. On 1/15/25, the resident was diagnosed with a Stage 3 pressure ulcer on the sacrum. there was no evidence that the care plan was updated to reflect the new skin care needs. On 2/19/25 at 12:30 p.m., this was confirmed with the Director of Nursing and Marketing Clinical Advisor.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a physician order for a wound clinic consultation was followed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer (Resident #1 [R1]). Finding: On 2/19/25, a review of R1's clinical record was completed. Documentation indicated that on 1/15/25, the resident had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer on the sacrum. On 1/16/25, the resident was sent to the hospital emergency department (ED) for an evaluation of lightheadedness. R1 returned to the facility with ED instructions for a referral to the hospital wound clinic. On 1/17/25, R1's primary physician signed the orders and the facility nurse noted the order. On 2/19/25 at 12:22 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Practical Nurse-Nurse Manager confirmed that the order for a wound clinic referral was not done.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, which included signing orders for medications and treatments listed on the Physician Orders (block orders) in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Residents #1 [R1]). Finding: On 02/19/25, R1's clinical record was reviewed and included block orders (30 day) signed by the physician on 12/10/24. The next block order, including a 10-day grace period, needed review and the Physician's signature by 1/20/25; there are no further visits from the physician. On 2/19/25 at 2:50 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Marketing Clinical Advisor confirmed that the last block order was signed on 12/10/24, making them 8 days late at the time of R1's discharge from the facility.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician made required visits, at least every 30 or every 60 days (depending on date of admission) and wrote a progress note for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #1 [R1,]. Findings: On 2/19/25, a review of R1's clinical record indicated that R1 was admitted on [DATE] and had a physician visit on 12/10/24. The next 30 day physician visit, including a 10-day grace period, which needed a review and written progress note was due on 1/20/25; there are no further visits from the physician. On 2/19/25 at 2:50 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Marketing Clinical Advisor confirmed that the last visit was on 12/10/24, making the review and progress note 8 days late at the time of R1's discharge from the facility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative (Resident #1 [R1]) of a fall with fracture. Finding: On 1/22/25, a review of R1's clinical record was completed. A nurse's note dated 12/23/24, indicated R1 had a fall and complained of right shoulder pain. A medical provider note dated 12/23/24, indicated that x-rays were order. A Radiology Report dated 12/24/24, indicated R1 sustained an acute right humeral neck fracture from the fall. There as no evidence to indicate that the resident's representative was immediately notified of the fall and fracture. On 1/22/25 at 3:00 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Administrator stated he was unable to locate evidence that R1's representative was promptly notified of the fractured humerus.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed for a change in a resident's condition-fractured right humerus for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a fracture. (Resident #1 [R1]) Finding: On 1/22/25, a review of R1's clinical record was completed. A nurse's note dated 12/23/24, indicated R1 had a fall and complained of right shoulder pain. A medical provider note dated 12/23/24, indicated that x-rays were order. A Radiology Report dated 12/24/24, indicated R1 sustained an acute right humeral neck fracture. A review of R1's care plan indicated there was no evidence that from 12/24/24 through to 1/19/25 (when R1 was discharged from the facility) a care plan was developed with interventions that would guide staff in the care of the fractured humerus and R1's decreased functional ability to use his/her upper extremity. On 1/22/25 at 3:00 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Administrator confirmed there was no care plan problem or interventions that addressed R1's fractured arm.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information in the area of weights for 2 of 3 Residents (Resident #1, and #2), meal intakes for 3 of 3 Residents (Resident's #1, #2, and #3), palliative care for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #1), falls for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #1), and positioning for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #2) reviewed during a complaint investigation. Findings: Review of policy Nutrition/Hydration Care and Services dated 2/1/23 states .Staff will provide nutritional and hydration care and services to each patient, maintain fluid and hydration balance. Monitor patient's weight as ordered. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include heart failure, and dementia, and severe anxiety. Review of Resident #1's provider orders revealed the following orders: -Order with start date of 12/19/24 for diuretic Furosemide Oral Tablet 40 MG (Furosemide) Give 40 mg orally one time a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of significant change in condition when a resident was noted to have a change in meal intakes and significant weight loss for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1). Findings: Review of policy Change of Condition dated 7/1/24 states A Center must immediately inform the patient, consult with the patient's physician, and notify, consistent with their authority, the patient's representative, where there is: .A significant change in patient's physical mental, or psychosocial status (that is a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications). A need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue or change and existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new forma of treatment) . Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include recent Urinary tract infection, congestive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1). Findings: Review of policy Person-Centered Care Plan dated 10/24/22 states .The Center must develop and implement a baseline person-centered care plan within 48 hours of admission/readmission for each patient/resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards of quality care. a baseline care plan must be developed within 48 hours and include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a patient including, but not limited to: initial goals based on admission orders; physician orders; dietary orders; therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to follow-up on significant weight loss, and reduced meal intake for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a compliant investigation (Resident #1). Findings: Review of policy Nutrition/Hydration Care and Services dated 2/1/23 states .Staff will provide nutritional and hydration care and services to each patient, consistent with the patient's comprehensive assessment . Use the Diet Order and Communication Form to initiate consult with Dietitian, when indicated. Obtain orders per recommendations. Contact physician/advanced practice provider (APP) to convey the recommendations. Develop .Plan of care for enhancing oral intake, promoting adequate nutrition and hydration, and identifying individualized goals, preferences, and choices. Maintain fluid and hydration balance. Monitor patient's weight as ordered . Address any changes in condition that affect or potentially affect the patient's nutritional status with Dietitian and physician/APP . Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1). Findings: Review of policy Medication Monitoring/Medication Management dated 1/24 states .When monitoring a resident receiving psychotropic medications, the facility must evaluate the effectiveness of the medications as well as look for potential adverse consequences . Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] for skilled care services and had diagnoses to include severe anxiety, depression, and delirium. Review of Resident #1's care plan initiated on 12/19/24 states Resident is at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs : antipsychotic, anxiolytics, antianxiety Goal: Resident will have the smallest most effective dose without side effects throughout review period Intervention: .monitor for changes in mental status and functional level and report to MD as indicated. Review of active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to assess a resident after returning from a surgical procedure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #1), and failed to complete admission assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3). Findings: 1. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed progress note dated 5/15/24 stated Received call from [Doctor] at [Hospital], wants resident transferred to surgery ASAP for a pacemaker battery change, Resident returned at 1830 (6:30 p.m.), set up the Medtronic relay, device is on the nightstand and working properly, provided the dinner food tray resident ate 50%, increased confusion, not following restriction protocol, family informed back at facility. Review of Resident #1's clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #1' s surgical wounds were assessed upon his/her return to facility. On 5/23/24 the Department of Licensing received a complaint indicating Resident #1 underwent a surgical procedure for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, the facility failed to update/implement goals and interventions for 3 of 3 care plans reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident's #1, #2, and #3). Findings: 1. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, hypertension, and complete atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker placement in 2010. Review of Resident #1's care plan, initiated 2/2/24, states Resident is at risk of complications related to pacemaker/internal defibrillator .Monitor for signs/symptoms of pacemaker complications i.e.: S.O.B., weakness, syncope, fatigue, cyanosis, bradycardia .Notify physician as needed. Review of Resident #1's clinical record lacked evidence that he/she was being monitored for above pacemaker complications. 2. Resident #2 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include osteoarthritis and recent total right hip replacement. Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed Discharge Summary Orthopedics dated 3/13/24 states Status post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to adequately assess, and obtain wound care orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during complaint investigation (Resident #1). Findings: On [DATE] the Department of Licensing received a complaint indicating Resident #1 underwent a surgical procedure for pacemaker battery replacement on [DATE] and cardiology department made multiple attempts to contact facility for post op wound care and did not get in contact with facility staff until 5 days later. When contact was made, the nurse was not aware the resident had 2 wound sites. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed progress note, dated [DATE] stated Received call from [Doctor] at [Hospital], wants resident transferred to surgery ASAP for a pacemaker battery change, Resident returned at 1830 (6:30 p.m.). Review of Resident #1's clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #1' s surgical wounds were assessed upon his/her return. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record review, and interviews the facility failed to provide residents/representatives written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advance directive for 14 of 17 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident's #5, #14, #19, #21, #22, #26, #27, #34, #44, #49, #52, #54, #58 and #219). Findings: Review of facility policy titled Review of facility policy Health Care Decision Making dated 1/8/24 states Centers must: Inform and provide written information to all patients concerning the rights to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the patient's option, formulate an advance directive: .approach a capable patient who does not have an advance directive upon admission , . so that patient's rights will be honored and their wishes will be executed at the appropriate time .Upon admission, determine whether the patient has an advance directive and .If the patient/patient representative has copies with them,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for the 4 of 4 units (Spring Gardens, North Wind, Penbscoto and Windward Center), the laundry room and hallways for 2 of 2 facility tours (4/22/24 and 4/25/24). Findings: 1. On 4/22/24 at 9:20 a.m., during a tour of Spring Gardens Unit, 2 surveyors, and the Corporate Nurse Educator (CNE) observed the following findings: > The shower room had a black headband, a white towel and a razor on the sink. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The toilet seat was visibly dirty/soiled and the call bell cord had blue yarn tied to it as an extender. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The toilet was continuously running. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The bathroom toilet was visibly dirty. There were 3 large holes in the wall above the toilet. The bathroom door was marred/gouged on the inside and outside of the door. > Resident room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on care plan review, observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide residents with a continuous resident centered activities program. This failure has the potential to affect all residents that would normally participate in activities. Findings: Review of facility policy Recreation Services Policies and Procedures dated 8/7/23 states Centers/Communities must provide, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of an and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each patient, encouraging both independence and integration in the community.Programs will be scheduled seven days a week. Weekend activities include secular and non-secular opportunities. 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and relies on staff for Activities of Daily Living. Review of Resident # 10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) 15 of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to base board hot water heating units for 2 of 2 observations and failed to ensure that that chemicals were properly secured for 1 of 4 days of survey. (4/22/24) Findings: 1. On 4/22/24 at 11:45 a.m., a surveyor observed the following on the Penobscot House Unit: > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]- The base board heating unit cover was partially off exposing sharp metal edges and hot pipes. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The base board heating unit was missing approximately an 18 inch section of pipe covering which exposed hot piping. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - The base board heating unit was missing approximately an 18 inch section of pipe covering which exposed hot piping. On 4/22/24 at 11:55 a.m., in an interview, the Administrator confirmed the findings. 2. On 4/22/24 at 12:40 p.m., a surveyor observed the following in Resident room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to oxygen and nebulizer mask/tubing for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #19 and #49) for 2 of 2 observations (4/22/24 and 4/23/24). Findings: 1. On 4/22/24 at 12:15 p.m., and on 4/23/24 at 8:50 a.m., a surveyor observed the unlabeled oxygen tubing for Resident #19. A review of the Resident #19's clinical record revealed that there was no order to change the tubing and no documentation showing that the tubing had been changed weekly. On 4/24/24 at 2:15 p.m., in an interview, the Senior Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #19's oxygen tubing had not been changed weekly and that Resident #19's clinical record lacked evidence showing that the tubing had been changed weekly. 2. On 4/22/24 at approx. 10:03 a.m., and on 4/23/24 at 8:00 a.m., observations of Resident #49's nebulizer mask stored on the nightstand labeled with a dated of 4/1/24. In a brief interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on performance evaluation review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations at least every 12 months for 5 of 5 sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA]). Findings: 1. CNA #1 was hired on 2/4/2019. The last annual performance evaluation was completed in 2021. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluations for 2022 and 2023. 2. CNA #2 was hired on 2/4/2020. The last annual performance evaluation was completed in 2021. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluations for 2022 and 2023. 3. CNA #3 was hired on 4/5/2021. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluations for 2022 and 2023. 4. CNA #4 was hired on 10/12/2021. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluations for 2022 and 2023. 5. CNA #5 was hired on 7/2/2018. The last annual performance evaluation was completed in 2021. The facility was unable to provide evidence of a completed annual performance evaluations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, facility policy, and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure proper vaccine storage temperatures for 2 of 2 medication storage room refrigerators (Spring Harbor and Penobscot House). Findings: Review of facility policy titled Medication Storage Guidance .influenza vaccine dated 2023 states, Store in the refrigerator at 36 degrees to 46 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of CDC guidance Vaccine Storage and Handling Toolkit dated 1/23 states .Refrigerators should maintain temperatures between 2° C and 8° C (36° F and 46° F) .Every vaccine storage unit must have a Temperature Monitoring Device (TMD). An accurate temperature history that reflects actual vaccine recommended temperature range. 1.On 4/23/24 at 7:15 a.m., two surveyors and Director of Nursing (DON) observed Spring Garden medication room refrigerator containing 3 vials of influenza vaccine available for use. Further observation of the medication room lacked evidence of monitoring refrigerator temperatures. At this time, the DON indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure products in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer were labeled and/or dated and failed to remove expired foods available for use for 1 of 1 kitchen tours. Further, the facility failed to ensure that the freezers were monitored, and temperatures documented accurately and that the dish machine was maintaining proper temperature ranges for proper washing/cleaning. This has the potential to affect all residents. Findings: Facilities Cold food policy and procedure revised 4/2018 states, All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TSC) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. 4. An accurate thermometer will be kept in each refrigerator and freezer a written record of daily temperatures will be recorded. 5. All foods will be wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Facilities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #10 and #219). Findings: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to facility on 11/17/22 and has diagnoses to include dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #10's active orders effective April 2024 revealed: -Order with start date of 2/29/24 for antipsychotic Risperdal oral tablet (Risperidone). Give 0.125 mg by mouth two times a day for mood stabilizer, agitation. Review of Resident #10's entire clinical record lacked evidence of behavior monitoring for side effects. - Order with start date of 11/3/23 for antidepressant Zoloft Oral Tablet 50 MG (Sertraline HCl). Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for major depression . Review of Resident #10s clinical record lacked evidence of behavior monitoring for side effects. On 4/23/24 at 2:50 p.m., review of Resident 10's entire clinical record with the Senior Director of Nursing confirming the above findings. 2. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent cross contamination and/or development of infection by maintaining a safe and sanitary environment related to personal toileting items, wash basins, medical supplies and linen for 2 of 4 days of survey on 3 of 4 units (Windward Gardens Penobscot and Spring Gardens). Findings: 1. On 4/22/24 and 4/23/24, a surveyor observed on Windward Gardens unit a bedpan and a wash basin located in a shared bathroom on the floor under the sink in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 4/23/24 at approximately 9:45 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator confirmed the above observations did not support good infection control practice. 2. On 4/22/24 at 10:54 a.m. to 11:06 a.m., observation of Penobscot to have the following: - room [ROOM NUMBER] had bariatric bed pan stored on the floor next to the toilet and a wash basin on shower floor. - room [ROOM NUMBER] had a bed pan stored upside down on the toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program which includes, at a minimum, training on abuse, resident rights and dementia management by failing to ensure that 4 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNAs) employed, completed the required annual training (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #4 and CNA #5). Findings: On 4/25/24, during a review of employee personnel records, the following was noted: 1. CNA #1 was hired on 2/4/2019. CNA #1's employee personnel record lacked evidence of mandatory resident rights education and dementia training within the last twelve months. 2. CNA #2 was hired on 2/4/2020. CNA #2's employee personnel record lacked evidence of mandatory abuse education, resident rights education and dementia training within the last twelve months. 3. CNA #4 was hired on 10/12/2021. CNA #4's employee personnel record lacked evidence of mandatory resident rights education within the last twelve months. 4. CNA #5 was hired on 7/2/2018. CNA #5's employee personnel record lacked evidence of mandatory abuse education,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNFABN) Form 10055, which included appeal rights and liability of payment, were provided at least 2 days prior to the resident's last covered day, for 2 of 3 residents whose Medicare Part A services were discontinued, and remained in the facility (#274 and #276). Findings: 1. Resident #274's Medicare Part A coverage for skilled services ended on 11/24/23. The medical record lacked evidence that Resident #274 or his/her legal representative was provided a SNFABN when the Medicare A coverage for skilled services was discontinued. The resident remained living in the facility. 2. Resident #276's Medicare Part A coverage for skilled services ended on 3/14/24. The medical record lacked evidence that Resident #276 or his/her legal representative was provided a SNFABN when the Medicare A coverage for skilled services was discontinued. The resident remained living in the facility. On 4/25/24 at 8:28 a.m., during an interview, the Administrator confirmed the SNFABN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 2 residents reviewed with a specialized mental health diagnosis, whose stay went beyond the expected 30 days, had been referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review Level II (PASRR) evaluation and determination (Resident #34 and Resident #52). Finding: 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder. Resident #34's clinical record contained a PASRR Level I determination letter dated 12/11/23 that stated further PASRR evaluation was not required due to Resident #34 met the criteria for a short-term convalescence admission. Resident #34 was not discharged after a short stay and was assessed to be Nursing Facility level of care and continued to reside in the facility. The clinical record lacked evidence to indicate that the PASRR Level I was forwarded again to the State Mental Health Authority to determine if a PASRR Level II evaluation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to update/implement goals and interventions in the area of antipsychotic medication use for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #10) Finding: Resident #10 was admitted to facility on 11/17/22 and has diagnoses to include dementia, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #10's active orders effective April 2024 revealed order with start date of 2/29/24 for antipsychotic Risperdal oral tablet (Risperidone). Give 0.125 mg by mouth two times a day for mood stabilizer, agitation. On 4/23/24 at 2:51 p.m., during review of Resident #10's entire clinical record, the Senior Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #10's care plan lacked goals/interventions and monitoring of side effects for antipsychotic use.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect a resident's current status for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (#49). Findings: 1. On 4/23/24 at 8:01 a.m., during an interview, Resident #49 stated, I lost my balance and fell hit my head . I was getting up to take my walker to go to the dining room. The Surveyor asked if staff was with him/her when the fall occurred, resident stated, Yes, it happened so quick. At this time, the surveyor observed a rolling walker across the room. Resident #49's care plan initiated on 2/22/24 states, Resident/Patient requires assistance/is dependent for ADL care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting related to: Recent illness, hospitalization, etc. resulting in fatigue, activity intolerance, confusion, etc. with intervention of: Provide resident/patient with extensive assist of 1 for ambulation using a wheelchair. Review of Therapy notes stated on 3/7/24 Resident #49 goals were met for Patient will safety ambulate on level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #219 and Resident #269). Findings: 1. On 4/24/24, Resident #219's clinical record was reviewed. Resident #219 had a medication order, dated 4/11/24, for Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams) Give 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety. A review of Resident #219's Medication Administration Record indicated that Resident #219 did not receive Lorazepam on 4/20/24 and 4/21/24. On 4/24/24 at 12:05 p.m., in an interview, the Senior Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #219 did not receive his/her Lorazepam on 4/20/24 and 4/21/24 as ordered. 2. Resident #269 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Benign non-nodular prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. A provider's note dated 3/8/24 stated, review of symptoms: genitourinary - frequency. Assessment/plan: urinary frequency- will check UA (urinalysis- urine sample). A Providers order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that treatment plans were followed, and resident records were accurate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure and venous ulcers (Resident #60). Finding: Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] with a Pressure ulcer to his/her right hip, and venous ulcers to bilateral lower extremities (shin). Review of the medical record contained the following Provider orders: - Order dated 4/17/24 for Venous - Right shin: Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply xeroform to wound base and cover with foam dressing. Every day shift for Wound care. - Order dated 4/17/24 for Venous - Left shin: Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply xeroform to wound base and cover with foam dressing. Every day shift for Wound care. - Order dated 4/16/24 for Pressure Injury - Right hip: Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply maxorb AG to wound base and cover with foam border. Every day shift for Wound care AND as needed. - Order dated 3/6/24 for Wound(s): Monitor site(s) (L) shin,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Narcotic Bound Book Shift Count page indicating that they counted all the controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts between 4/11/24 through 4/22/24 on 1 of 3 units observed. (North Wind) Findings: Genesis HealthCare policy titled Controlled Drugs: Management of states, A complete count of all Schedule II-IV controlled substances is required at the change of shifts per state regulation or at any time in which narcotic keys are surrendered from one licensed nursing staff to another. The count must be performed by two licensed nurses and/or authorized nursing personnel, per state regulations. Review of bound medication book labeled WWG, NW, Book 2 revealed that oncoming nurse failed to sign the shift count page on 4/11/24 at 7:00 a.m., 4/17/24 at 7:00 a.m. and 4/18/24 at 7:00 a.m. The outgoing nurse failed to sign 4/18/24 at 1900 and on 4/21/24 evening shift. On 4/24/24 at 10:41 a.m., during an interview, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to show evidence of documentation to justify the use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (#10). Findings: Review of facility policy Psychotropic Medication Use dated 11/28/16 states . All medications used to treat behaviors must have a clinical indication and be uses in the lowest dose to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. All medications used to treat behaviors should be monitored for: Efficacy, risks, benefits and harm or adverse consequences. Antipsychotic medications used to treat Behavioral or Psychosocial Symptoms of Dementia must be clinically indicated, be supported by adequate rational for uses, and may not be used for behavior with an unidentified causes .Facility should ensure that Physician/Prescriber has conducted a comprehensive assessment for the resident and has documented in the clinical record that the psychopharmacological medication is necessary .Facility staff should monitor the resident's behavior pursuant to facility policy using a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for the 3 of 4 units (Spring Gardens, Windward Center and North Wind) for 1 of 1 facility tours (1/9/24). Findings: On 1/9/24 from 11:10 a.m. to 11:40 a.m., an environmental tour was conducted with a Maintenance Director and the Marketing Clinical Advisor in which the following findings were observed: Spring Gardens Unit: > The television/sitting area, across from resident room [ROOM NUMBER], had a small table that had a worn/missing surface treatment exposing bare wood and creating an uncleanable surface. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There were 2 broken window shades. > The hallway wooden hand railings were missing surface treatment exposing bare wood creating uncleanable surfaces. > The wood trim on the nurse's station had missing surface treatment exposing bare wood creating an uncleanable surface. > The 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment was free from the potential risk of accident relating to moving dollies, a floor heater unit, and exit doors and exit pathways for 2 of 2 observations for 2 of 2 days of survey. (1/8/24 and 1/9/24) In addition, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and complete an assessment of resident capabilities and deficits to determine resident safety for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for smoking (#24, #26). Findings: 1. 0n 1/8/24 at 10:35 a.m., during a facility tour with the Administrator, the following findings of accident hazards were observed: Spring Gardens Unit: > There were 2 rolling moving dollies sitting on the floor in the television/sitting room. > The floor heater unit in the dining room was missing an access panel exposing wiring, hot water pipes and sharp metal. > The exit doors and exit pathways were not cleared of snow, ice and open for use as exits to a public way after a recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that foods in the kitchenette refrigerators and cupboards we're labeled and securely closed for 1 of 4 kitchenettes (Spring Gardens Unit) for 1 of 2 survey days (1/8/24). Additionally the facility failed to ensure that staff working in the kitchen we're wearing hair protectors and/or facial hair protectors for 1 of 1 kitchen tour on 1 of 2 survey days (1/9/24). Findings: 1. 0n 1/8/24 at 10:30 a.m., a surveyor observed the following in the refrigerator and a cupboard on the Spring Gardens Unit: > The refrigerator had an open pudding cup that was not sealed or labeled with a name. > The bread cupboard had a previously opened unsealed loaf of bread. 0n 1/8/24 at 10:30 a.m., in an interview, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) confirmed the findings. 2. 0n 1/9/24 at 9:40 a.m., a surveyor observed a male kitchen worker with a full beard not wearing a facial hair protector and a female kitchen worker with long hair not wearing a hair protector. 0n 1/9/24 at 9:40 a.m., in an interview, the Food Service Director confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (#11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #20, #21). Findings: 1. A review of Resident #11's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation of activities of daily living (ADLs) for November 1-30, 2023, revealed multiple days lacking documentation on multiple shifts as follows: Bed Mobility: 22 out of 30 days Behavior Monitoring and Interventions: 21 out of 30 days Eating: 21 out of 30 days Bathing: 23 out of 30 days Dressing: 23 out of 30 days Drinks/snacks other than meals: 23 out of 30 days Hygiene: 23 out of 30 days Toileting: 21 out of 30 days Transfers: 22 out of 30 days Wheelchair mobility - 24 out of 30 days Walking - 24 out of 30 days Mouth care - 21 out of 30 days 2. A review of Resident #12's CNA documentation of ADL's for August 1-31, 2023, revealed multiple days lacking documentation on multiple shifts as follows: Bed Mobility: 23 out of 31 days Behavior Monitoring and Interventions: 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse Prohibition policy to ensure an alleged violation involving verbal abuse was reported within 2 hours to the Division of Licensing and Certification (State Agency) for 1 of 29 residents reviewed. (#5) Finding: The facility's Abuse Prohibition, revised 10/24/22 on Page 6 reads Report allegations involving abuse (physical, verbal, sexual, mental) no later than two hours after the allegation is made and Notify local law enforcement, licensing board and registries and other agencies as required. On 4/20/23, the Division of Licensing and Certification received from the facility a reportable incident form which indicated an allegation of verbal abuse towards Resident #5 by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who was witnessed raising his/her voice, in a derogatory manner and using profanity while working with the resident. Further review of the Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form, reveals the date of the alleged incident to have occurred on the evening of 4/15/23. On 1/9/24 at 3:00 p.m. in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of the transfers/discharges to an acute care hospital for 1 of 7 residents sampled for hospitalizations. (#22) Finding: Documentation in Resident #22's clinical record indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 4/23/23 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #22 and/or the resident representative were provided with a written transfer/discharge notice upon transfer. On 1/9/24 at approx. 11:00 a.m., during an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed the above finding.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily bed hold cost, to a resident, known family member or legal representative for 1 of 7 residents sampled for hospitalizations. (#22) Finding Resident #22's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on 4/23/23 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #22 and/or the resident representative were provided with a written bed hold notice. On 1/9/24 at approx. 11:00 a.m., during an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed the above finding.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the problems, interventions, and initial goals needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 6 residents that were reviewed for baseline care plans. (#21) Finding: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The discharge summary from the hospital included information that the resident had a diagnosis of diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, bilateral foot drop which requires braces for ambulating, spinal stenosis and frequent falls. Review of the clinical record revealed that it lacked evidence of a baseline care plan completed within 48 hours to include the instructions necessary to properly care for Resident #21's immediate health and safety needs for the above concerns. The care plan was initiated on 8/18/23, 7 days after admission. In addition, the care plan lacked information on Resident #21's bilateral foot drop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review/revise and update care plan interventions for the problem area of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. #21 Findings: Review of Resident #21's care plan initiated on 8/18/23 in the area of ADL's states, provide resident/patient with extensive assist of 2 for transfers using a lift to wheelchair and Provide resident/patient with extensive assist of 2 for toileting. admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment, dated 8/17/23, was coded on section GG Mobility, that Resident required partial moderate assist and, helper does less than half of the effort, for sit to stand and chair/bed to chair transfer. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation reviewed for 8/12/23 - 8/25/23 revealed Resident #21 required limited to extensive assist of 1 staff for transfers/walking in room and supervision/limited assist of 1 staff for toileting. Interviews conducted with staff during the complaint survey revealed that Resident #21 required limited assistance of 1 staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to identify a resident's care needs and provide timely treatment to manage pain for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls with injury (#13). Findings: A review of the facility's Falls Management policy, with a revision date of 8/7/23, stated Purpose: To evaluate the patient for injury post-fall and provide appropriate and timely care. Section 5, Post-Fall Management: 5.2.2. If the extent of injuries cannot be determined, the nurse will notify emergency medical services (EMS) for evaluation and transport to the hospital. A review of the clinical record of Resident #13, noted a [AGE] year old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] following repair of a right hip fracture. Additional diagnoses included Dementia and Parkinsonism. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, completed 10/24/23, identified Resident #13's need for maximum to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) including dressing, transfers, toileting, and bed mobility. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart containing multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments, syringes, insulin and inhalation treatment medications was locked on 2 of 7 units. (Penobscot House & Spring Gardens) Findings: 1. On 9/6/23 at 10:55 a.m., a surveyor observed an unattended, unlocked treatment cart in the hallway across from the Penobscot House nurses station. The treatment cart contained multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments and syringes. Resident residents and unauthorized personnel were observed crossing through area. A surveyor confirmed the above finding, at the time of the observation with Registered Nurse #1 (RN) at 11:00 a.m., who immediately locked the cart and confirmed that the treatment cart should be locked. 2. On 9/6/23 at 11:48 a.m to 11:56 a.m , a surveyor observed an unattended, unlocked treatment cart in the hallway across from the Spring Gardens nurses station. The cart contained multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments, inhalation treatments, needles, and syringes. There were four residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information in a prominent place, readily accessible and visible to all residents, for 3 days.( 4/12/25 , 4/13/25 and 4/14/25). Finding: On 4/14/25 at 8:00 a.m., 3 surveyors observed that the nurse staffing information posted in an area visible to residents and visitors was dated 4/11/25 (Friday). On 4/15/25 at 2:46 p.m., in an interview, the Market Clinical Advisor confirmed that the nurse staffing information was not posted on (Saturday- 4/12/25 , Sunday-4/13/25 and Monday-4/14/25).
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident, family and/or the resident's representative in writing of the transfers/discharge to an acute care hospital for 2 of 6 residents sampled for hospitalizations (Residents #5 and #49). Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident #5's clinical record indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/24/23 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #5 and/or the resident representative were provided with written transfer/discharge notices upon either transfer. On 4/24/24 at 9:45 a.m., during an interview, the Licensed Social Worker stated he/she could not locate the transfer/discharge for the dates of 11/22/23 and 11/24/23. 2. Documentation in Resident #49's clinical record indicated that the resident was transferred to the hospital on 4/17/24 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #49 and/or the resident representative were provided with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice which included the daily bed hold cost, to a resident, known family member and/or legal representative for 2 of 6 sampled residents who had been transferred to the hospital (Residents #5 and #49). Findings: 1.Resident #5's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and 11/24/23 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #5 and/or the resident representative were provided with a written bed hold notice for the dates of 11/22/23 and 11/24/23. On 4/24/24 at 9:45 a.m., during an interview, the Licensed Social Worker stated he/she could not locate the bed hold notice for the dates of 11/22/23 and 11/24/23. 2. Resident #49's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on 4/17/24 and subsequently admitted . The clinical record lacked evidence that Resident #49 and/or the resident representative were provided with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the current daily nurse staffing information between 8/31/23 and 9/6/23. Finding: On 9/6/23 at 7:45 a.m., a surveyor observed that the nurse staffing information was posted on the first floor entrance door. The date on the nurse staffing information was 8/31/23; staffing for 6 days earlier. On 9/6/23 at 11:31 a.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the Regional Administrator confirmed that the nurse staffing had not been posted since 8/31/23.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE OF MAINE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/02/2013 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/31/2010 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| CERKOVITZ, BRANDON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/18/2024 |
| YNTEMA, LAURIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205180. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.