Pinnacle Health & Rehab Canton
26 Pleasant St, Canton, ME 04221 · For profit - Corporation · 47 certified beds · (207) 597-2510 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.8% | 24.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.6% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.1% | 11.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 39.2% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.3% | 17.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.5% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.9% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 37.2% | 20.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.0% | 74.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 6.2% | 20.8% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.1% | 16.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.44 | 1.45 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.12 | 2.01 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.1%CMS range 25.4–51.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.3–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 47 beds and averages 38.2 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.20 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the confidentiality of protected health information for 1 of 41 residents during 1 of 3 days of survey (Resident #3).Findings:On 9/24/25 at 3:15 p.m., two surveyors observed an unattended medication cart outside room [ROOM NUMBER] with a fully open computer monitor with Resident #3's electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) displayed, visible and easily accessible to residents, visitors or other unauthorized persons. There were no staff observed in the area, and 1 resident was observed in the hall. Approximately 1 minute later the Certified Nursing Assistant/Medication Technician (CNA7) was observed coming from behind the nurses' station and walked up to the medication cart, acknowledged the unsecured medication cart and closed the eMAR stating, I was only over there at the nurses station.During an interview on 9/24/25 at 3:17 p.m., the above was discussed with Director of Nursing.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for 3 of 3 days of survey (9/22/25, 9/23/25 and 9/24/25) for resident rooms, hallways and the laundry room for 3 of 3 facility tours.Findings:1. On 9/22/25 at 8:00 a.m., a surveyor toured and observed the facility to smell of stale urine and feces throughout the facility.2. On 9/23/25 at 7:55 a.m., a picture was handing on the wall by room [ROOM NUMBER]. The frame was observed to be broken in the bottom left corner and was held together with scotch tape. There was also picture hanging directly across the hall on the wall with the bottom right edge of the frame coming apart. On 9/23/25 at 8:03 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) confirmed the finding.3. On 9/23/25 at 9:23 a.m., two surveyors noted a very strong urine order at door of room [ROOM NUMBER]. wet floor sign noted on entrance.4. On 9/24/25 at 8:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop/implement goals and interventions for psychotropic use for 3 of 16 care plans reviewed (Resident's #2, #6 and #7).Findings: 1.Resident #3 was admitted on 5/25 and has diagnoses to include major depressive disorder. Review of Resident 's active orders revealed he/she is taking antidepressant medications Remeron and Lexapro, and antianxiety medication Lorazepam. Review of Resident #3's care plan updated 5/13/25 states [Resident #3] uses antidepressant medication r/t Depression. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness Q-SHIFT. Monitor/document/report PRN adverse reactions to antidepressant therapy: change in behavior/mood/cognition; hallucinations/delusions; social isolation, suicidal thoughts, withdrawal; decline in ADL ability, continence, no voiding; constipation, fecal impaction, diarrhea; gait changes, rigid muscles, balance probs, movement problems, tremors, muscle cramps, falls; dizziness/vertigo; fatigue, insomnia; appetite loss,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 5 of 16 residents (R) reviewed for care planning (R2, R6, R12, R36, R35).Findings: 1. A review of R35's clinical record revealed an MDS admission Assessment was completed on 8/12/25. Further review of R35's clinical record lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days following the assessment. On 9/23/25 at 11:32 a.m. during an interview with 2 surveyors, the Social Services Director stated that an IDT meeting was not held following R35's admission Assessment. Findings: 2 Review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the following: -Annual MDS with completion date 1/22/25. Further review of Resident #2's clinical record revealed the IDT meeting was held on 1/16/25 (6 days prior to completed MDS). Quarterly MDS with completion date 10/23/24. Further review of Resident #2's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to monitor and document targeted side effects to support the use of an antipsychotic and antianxiety medication for of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident's #2, #6 ). Findings: 1.Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #3's active orders revealed: -Order with start date of 5/14/25 for antidepressant Lexapro Oral tablet 10 mg (Escitalopram) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. -Order with start date of 5/13/25 for antidepressant Remeron Oral Tablet 15 mg (Mirtazapine). Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime. -Order with start date of Lorazepam Intensol Oral Concentrate 2 MG/ML (Lorazepam) Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 3 hours as needed for anxiety or restlessness. Review of Resident #3's care plan updated 5/13/25 states: [Resident #3] uses antidepressant medication r/t Depression; Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness Q-SHIFT. [Resident #3] uses psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and review the facility's Food Storage Policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for fans, a food mixer, and floors. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure foods were properly labeled for 1 of 1 kitchen tour on 1 of 3 days of survey. (9/22/25)Findings:The facility's Food Storage Policy noted: Each item will be dated with a received date, once opened the box will be dated with an open date. Items taken out of the box and opened needs a received date and an open date (as of 9/22/25 all items taken out of a box without labeling of the contents will be labeled with the item name) receive date and open date.On 9/22/25 from 9:00 a.m. to 9:50 a.m., a surveyor conducted a kitchen tour with the Food Service Supervisor in which the following findings were observed: - The dish room had a wall fan that was dusty/dirty, had two ceiling tiles that had fallen partially out of the ceiling grid holding them in place and had a wall air vent that was heavily soiled with dust.- The food mixer had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to ensure that the Plan of Correction (POC) for an identified deficiency from the annual Long Term Care Recertification Survey, dated 11/19/25, was effective. The Federal citation F583, F584 and F689 were cited again during the re-visit to the annual Long Term Care Recertification Survey, dated 12/30/25.Findings:During the follow-up survey on 12/30/25, it was determined that F583, F584 and F689 would be recited for the same reasons: F583 for failure to ensure the confidentiality of protected health information, F584 for failure to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment and F689 for failure to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards. (see F583, F584 and F689)On 12/30/25 at 1:45 p.m., during an interview, the above was discussed with the Director of Nursing.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, facility policy, and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to the handling of soiled linen for 3 of 3 observations on 2 of 3 days of survey (9/22/25 and 9/24/25) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 day of survey (9/23/25). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that a resident being treated for an open and draining wound was maintained on EBP for 1 of 2 sampled residents (R) reviewed for wounds (R35). Findings: The facility's Laundry and Bedding, Soiled policy and procedure dated 04/01/24 noted: Policy: Soiled laundry/bedding(e.g., personal clothing, uniforms, scrub suits, gowns, bedsheets, blankets, towels, etc.) shall be handled in a manner that prevents gross microbial contamination of the air and persons handling the linen. Procedure: 2. Place contaminated laundry in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for nursing staff contracted through the AllShifts Application (App) in the areas of dementia care, resident rights, and abuse and neglect training by failing to ensure contracted AllShifts Professionals completed training prior to independently providing services to residents for 4 of 4 contracted staff reviewed during a complaint investigation (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] #8, #9, and #10, and Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #3).Finding:Review of the AllShifts Terms of Service states, under section 2.1 ALLSHIFTS MARKETPLACE, LLC AS A MARKETPLACE, AllShifts merely makes the Site and Services available to enable Professionals and Facilities to find and transact directly with each other.Users alone are responsible for evaluating and determining the suitability of any shift, Facility, or Professional. and under section 2.2 USERS ARE INDEPENDENT FROM ALLSHIFTS states, .Facilities are solely responsible for and have complete discretion with regard to their use of and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation injury of unknown origin for 1 of 1 facility incident reports reviewed (Resident #12).Findings:Review of Abuse Investigation policy (undated) states All reports of resident abuse, neglect, and.shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management. The individual conducting the investigation will.Review the completed concern/complaint report; Interview the resident, Interview any witnesses to the incident; Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; interview staff members who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident; Interview the resident's roommate, family members, and visitors as applicable; Interview other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services; and review all events leading up to the alleged incident. Witness reports are required to be written with signature and date. On 12/31/24 the Department of Licensing received a facility reported incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow their own Accident and Incident and Fall policies when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to notify the charge nurse before moving a resident after a witnessed fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident [R] 26). As a result, the resident's arm got caught in his/her wheelchair, and he/she sustained a right humeral head fracture.Finding:Review of facility 's Accidents and Incidents Policy, revised 9/9/25, states Regardless of how minor an accident or incident may be .it must be reported to the charge nurse as soon as such accident/incident occurs is discovered . The Charge nurse must be immediately informed of accidents or incidents so that medical attention can be provided .Do not move the victim until he/she has been examined for possible injuries .The Charge Nurse shall .Examine all accident/incident victims .Notify the victim's physician of the accident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards by ensuring a base board heater cover was secure and in place covering sharp metal for 1 of 1 observation on 1 of 3 days of survey. (9/22/25)Finding:On 9/22/25 at 9:53 a.m., a surveyor observed a base board heating unit in the hallway across from resident room [ROOM NUMBER] that had the front cover partially off exposing sharp metal fins.On 9/22/25 at 9:58 a.m., in an interview with two surveyors present, the Director of Nursing confirmed the finding and stated that the facility has residents that ambulate around the facility and move around the facility in wheelchairs.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents call bell was within reach for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1). Findings: Review of Resident #1 progress note dated 5/27/25 at 10:55 a.m. indicated that he/she sustained an unwitnessed fall, he/she was found in front of his/her wheelchair next to his/her bed. Review of the post fall assessment completed 5/27/25 showed the resident did not have his/her call bell within reach at the time of the fall. Review of Resident #1 care plan under the focus states he/she is at risk for falls. Further review shows that under Interventions/Tasks section of the care plan staff should Be sure (his/her) call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed On 6/10/25 at 11:00 a.m., the above information was discussed with the Director of Nursing.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to promote care for a resident in a manner that maintains dignity and respect when staff failed to groom a resident on 3 of 3 survey days (Resident #31). In addition, the facility failed to identify a medication correctly to 1 of 1 resident observed for medication pass (Resident #242). Findings: 1. Resident #31 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnosis of dementia and is dependent on staff for all of his/her activities of daily living needs. During observations on 7/29/24 at 11:01 a.m., 7/30/24 at 9:39 a.m., and 12:26 p.m., 7/31/24 at 8:21 a.m., Resident #31 was noted to have long facial/chin hair. Review of Resident #31's Task-Personal Hygiene-Support Provided - How resident maintains personal hygiene, including . shaving, revealed Resident #31 received 1-2 person hygiene assistance on 7/26/24 at 11:04 a.m., and 22:05 [10:05 p.m.], on 7/27/24 at 10:14 a.m., and 21:11 [10:11 p.m.], on 7/28/24 at 10:03 a.m., and 17:48 [5:48 p.m.] on 7/29/24 at 10:22 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for bathrooms, a ceiling tile, a patient lift, lights, floors and wheelchairs for 1 of 1 facility tour (7/31/24). Findings: A surveyor conducted a facility Environment tour on 7/31/24 from 12:05 p.m. to 12:30 p.m. with the Maintenance Director and the Administrator in which the following findings were observed: > The bathroom, located across from the nurse's station, had a dirty floor around base of the toilet and stained floor tiles. > The hallway ceiling tile, by resident room [ROOM NUMBER], had a large brown stain on it. > The sit-to-stand patient lift, in the hallway by resident room [ROOM NUMBER], had chipped/missing paint on the foot base creating an uncleanable surface. Additionally, there was dirt and food debris in the foot base area. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There was dust/debris in the bathroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to update/implement a care plan in the area of falls for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#30 and #80, in the area of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #9), and in the area of mood and behaviors for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for behaviors (Resident #31). Findings: 1. On 7/29/24 at 11:08 a.m., two surveyors observed Resident #30 in a wheelchair with his/her feet on the wheelchair pedals. The call bell was attached to the bed, outside of the resident's reach. The Surveyor asked the resident if he/she could reach the call bell, he/she attempted but could not reach. At this time, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #4 confirmed Resident #30 cannot propel independently in his/her wheelchair and would not be able to move the wheelchair to reach the call bell. Review of Resident #30's care plan for falls initiated on 1/5/23 instructs nursing to Be sure [his/her] call light is within reach and encourage the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy the facility failed to adequately date and ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use in 1 of 2 medication carts observed (nurse medication cart) and failed to ensure biologicals were stored at appropriate temperatures in 2 of 3 refrigerators observed (medication room top and bottom refrigerators). Findings: Facilities Storage of Medications policy and procedure, effective July 2020 states, All medications are maintained within the temperature ranges . refrigerated 36°F to 46°F with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring .The facility should maintain a temperature log in the storage area to record temperatures at least once a day . The facility should check the refrigerator or freezer in which vaccines are stored, at least two times a day, per CDC guidelines .When the original seal of the manufacturers container or vial is initially broken, that container or vial will be dated. The nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication and enter the date opened . The nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 2 residents reviewed with a specialized mental health diagnosis, whose stay went beyond the expected 30 days, had been referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review Level II (PASRR) evaluation and determination (Resident #10 and Resident #15). Findings: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Schizophrenia. Resident #10's clinical record contained a PASRR Level I determination letter dated 6/12/24 that stated further PASRR evaluation was not required due to Resident #10 met the criteria for a short-term convalescence admission. Resident #10 was not discharged after a short stay and was assessed to be Nursing Facility level of care and continued to reside in the facility. The clinical record lacked evidence to indicate that the PASRR Level I was forwarded again to the State Mental Health Authority to determine if a PASRR Level II evaluation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the problems, interventions, and initial goals needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. (#190). Findings: Resident #190 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident #190 active orders July 2024 revealed the following: -Order with start date of 7/23/24 for Advair HFA Inhalation Aerosol 115-21 MCG/ACT (Fluticasone-Salmeterol) 2 puff inhale orally two times a day related to CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE. -Order with start date of 7/24/24 for Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG/3ML 3 ml inhale orally every 6 hours as needed for SOB or Wheezing via nebulizer and 3 ml inhale orally two times a day for copd. -Order with start date of 7/24/24 for Prednisone Oral Tablet 10 MG (Prednisone). Give 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was updated to reflect the resident's current needs for range of motion for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for range of motion (ROM) (Resident #4). Finding: Resident #4 was most recently admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy with muscle wasting and atrophy. Observations of Resident #4 on 7/29/24 at 11:56 a.m., and 7/30/24 at 1:15 p.m., revealed he/she has bilateral hand/arm contractures. At this time Resident #4 indicated that he/she did not have a hand brace and did not want one. Review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed order with start date of 12/22/17 states BRACE MAY WEAR PRN as needed for POSITIONING HAND/WRIST FOR NEUTRAL POSITION Further review of Resident #4's clinical record revealed order was discontinued on 9/5/23. Review of Resident #4's entire clinical record revealed that care plan meetings were held on 1/25/2024, 4/18/2024, 7/18/2024, and 10/26/2023. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan most recently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to a patient lift for 1 of 4 days of survey. (7/29/24) Finding: On 7/29/24 at 9:35 a.m., two surveyors observed a patient lift, available for use in the hallway by resident room [ROOM NUMBER], that was missing a sling bar safety clip that would prevent the sling strap from potentially coming off during a lift/transfer. On 7/29/24 at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed a patient lift, available for use in the hallway by resident room [ROOM NUMBER], was missing a sling bar safety clip at the time of the surveyor's observations. The Director of Nursing stated that the lift has since been removed from the floor.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify a resident's current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/trauma to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #9]. Findings: Review of policy Trauma Informed Care undated states .The resident, responsible party, and multidisciplinary team will develop a resident centered care plan the will include triggers that may [case] re-traumatization, as well as [anu] holistic interventions that may keep the resident safe and healthy . Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, Post traumatic stress disorder, bipolar, and major depressive disorder. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15 of 15 indicating he/she is cognitively intact. Further review of MDS revealed resident had diagnoses to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, the facility's Refrigeration Policy, and the facility's Dish Machine Temperature Log, the facility failed to ensure facial hair protection was worn; failed to ensure the walk-in freezer temperatures were monitored; and failed to ensure refrigerator and freezer temperatures were monitored for 1 of 1 kitchen tour for 1 of 3 days of survey.(7/29/24). Findings: On 7/29/24 from 9:40 a.m. to 10:10 a.m., two surveyors conducted an initial kitchen tour with the Food Service Director in which the following findings were observed: Refrigeration Policy Procedure: 2. The morning cook is to read and record the inside thermometer of each refrigerator and freezer and record on the refrigerator/freezer temperature log sheet within 30 minutes of the shift. Procedure: 3. The evening cook is to read and record the inside thermometer of each refrigerator and freezer and record on the refrigerator/freezer temperature log sheet within 60 minutes of the end of the shift. Dish Machine Temperature Log 1. The Kitchen Supervisor will train dishwashing staff to monitor dish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly contained. On 7/29/24 the cart utilized to store garbage was observed to have no lid/cover, leaving the garbage inside the cart exposed, creating the potential for the harborage and feeding of pests for 1 of 3 days of survey. Finding: On 7/29/24 from 9:40 a.m. to 10:10 a.m., two surveyors conducted an initial kitchen tour with the Food Service Director in which the following findings were observed: > Two surveyors observed trash being stored in an open top cart outside the facility next to the kitchen area. On 7/29/24 at 10:10 a.m., in an interview, the Food Service Director confirmed the finding and stated that the trash is kept in the open bin and then wheeled to the large trash trailer later in the day.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen walk-in freezer was maintained in good repair and in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen tours (7/29/24). Finding: On 7/29/24 from 9:40 a.m. to 10:10 a.m., two surveyors conducted an initial kitchen tour with the Food Service Director in which the following finding were observed: > The walk-in freezer had a large ice build-up keeping the freezing unit left fan from running and the freezing unit right fan made a loud noise while spinning and hitting an ice build-up near it. On 7/29/24 at 10:10 a.m., in an interview with two surveyors, the Food Service Director confirmed that there was a large ice build-up keeping the freezing unit left fan from running and the freezing unit right fan made a loud noise while spinning and hitting an ice build-up near it. The Food Service Director stated that the walk-in freezer had been worked on in February of 2024. The Food Service Director went on to state that it hasn't ran properly since, has been worked on many times and continues to ice up.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, and review of the rashes, data collection line listing, the facility failed to enhance the quality of care for residents when they failed to timely diagnose and treat Sarcoptes scabiei (scabies) and failed to follow CDC recommendations to prevent the spread and/or re-exposure in 7 of 7 residents who were infected with rashes. Findings: The facilities Infection Control Policy and Procedure for Transmission Based Precautions states, Appropriate precautions shall be used either at all times (Standard Precautions) or for individuals who are documented or suspected to have infections or communicable diseases that can be transmitted to others (transmission based precautions). Contact Precautions: and two standard precautions, implement contact precaution for residents known or expected to be infected or colonized with microorganisms that can be OK transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental services or resident care items in the resident's environment. Section A. Examples of infections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain and implement an infection control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious disease Sarcoptes scabiei (scabies) in 3 of 3 residents who were infected with rashes (#3, #5, #6) and failed to follow CDC recommendations to help prevent spread or reexposure. Findings: The facility's Infection Control Policy and Procedure for Transmission Based Precautions states, Appropriate precautions shall be used either at all times (Standard Precautions) or for individuals who are documented or suspected to have infections or communicable diseases that can be transmitted to others (transmission based precautions). Contact Precautions: and two standard precautions, implement contact precaution for residents known or expected to be infected or colonized with microorganisms that can be OK transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental services or resident care items in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain adequate housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 12 of 22 resident rooms, shower/whirlpool and bathrooms, hallways, a kitchenette and the laundry room for 2 of 3 days of survey. Findings: On 5/8/23 at approximately 10:25 a.m., during observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], there was an unmarked urinal in the bathroom and in room [ROOM NUMBER] an unmarked graduated cylinder with dried dark yellow material on the bottom was observed. On 5/8/23 at 10:39 a.m., during an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], two pink wash basins were sitting on the bathroom floor. On 5/9/23 at 8:15 a.m., during an additional observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], two pink wash basins were sitting on the bathroom floor. On 5/8/23 at 10:50 a.m., during an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], a white specimen collector pan was on the floor in the bathroom. On 5/9/23 at 8:17 a.m., during an additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to a patient lift and a kitchen steamer a for 2 of 2 facility tours, for 1 of 3 days of survey. (5/8/23) In addition, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to toilet safety frame and rails for 2 of 3 days of survey (5/8/23 and 5/9/23). Findings: 1. On 5/8/23 at 9:08 a.m., a surveyor observed an Invacare 450 patient lift, in the hallway, that was missing the six swing arm safety clips that secure the lift pads on the swing arm when in use. 2. On 5/8/23 at 9:50 a.m., the steamer in the kitchen was venting exhaust steam up towards the hood vent and directly over the outlet to the steamer. Condensation from the exhausted steam formed water which ran down the wall (ruining the wall) and dripped directly onto the steamer plug outlet creating a potential safety hazard . The cook confirmed, in an interview at this time, that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, the facility's Labeling and Dating Food policy and the Sanitation of Food Services Department policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a wall mounted fan, an exhaust fan, ceiling tiles, ceiling tile grids, ceiling air vents, a wall heater, the walls and the hood system. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure products on kitchen shelving, in a walk-in refrigerator, in a reach-in freezer and in a walk-in freezer were labeled/dated and/or secured closed for 1 of 1 tour. Findings: Review of the facility's Sanitation of Food Services Department noted: Policy: The food services staff shall maintain the sanitation of the Food Service Department through compliance with a written comprehensive cleaning schedule. Review of the facility's Labeling and Dating Food policy noted: Policy: The purpose of this policy is to provide a procedure for recording all food items that enter into a fridge. Procedure: 1. All items that are stored in the fridge must be covered. 2. All food items must be labeled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interview, and the facility's Nursing Policy Manual, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection, for 1 of 1 sampled resident's reviewed for Respiratory Care (#7). Finding: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Acute respiratory failure and Chronic Pulmonary Edema. On 5/8/23 at 10:35 a.m., during an interview with Resident #7, a surveyor observed the nebulizer tubing dated 1/30/23 and the nebulizer equipment to be sitting next to the nebulizer on a paper towel uncovered. The resident stated that he/she has used the nebulizer a few times since 1/30/23. The facility's Nursing Policy Manual noted under Cleaning of Durable Medical Equipment: Policy - To keep equipment clean and sanitized to reduce and prevent nosocomial infections. Procedures: 1. B. Oxygen concentrators: wiped down weekly along with changing oxygen tubing, nebulizer masks and cannulas. They…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NACHFOLGER, ISRAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 99% | since 12/31/2015 |
| NACHFOLGER, MIRIAM | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/23/2025 |
| HUHN, KENNETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/23/2025 |
| SIVAKUMAR, SIVA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| PLEASANT ST REALTY | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $455K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205101. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.