High View Rehabilitation And Living Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 37.4 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.46 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility's Bed Safety policy, clinical record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to identify hazards in a resident's environment and implement interventions to prevent avoidable accidents/injuries. This failure resulted in Resident #3 (R3) obtaining a skin tear when hitting his/her right arm on the exposed, uncovered, square tubing on the bed frame that the mattress was not wide enough to cover, and failure to identify exposed areas of a bed frame that created a risk of entrapment for Resident #26 (R26). This created an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for all 35 residents. Findings: On 3/31/25, the facility census was 35; all 35 resident bed frames have a mattress, and 2 quarter size bed rails attached to the bed frames. On 3/31/25, the facility's Bed Safety policy, undated, was reviewed. The policy indicated the following: -To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails, headboard, footboard, and bed accessories), the facility shall promote the following approaches:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-04-09 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bed dimensions were appropriate for a resident resulting in a 10 inch gap between the mattress and the bed rail. This failure created the potential for bodily injury including death by entrapment of body parts, for 1 of 35 residents [Resident #26 (R26]. In addition to the resident in immediate jeopardy, the facility's failure to regularly inspect and monitor bed rails resulted in the potential for harm for 35 out of 35 residents with bed rails. Finding: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment document, published by the FDA on March 10, 2006, the FDA is recommending a dimensional limit of less than 120 millimeters (4 ¾ inches) for the area between the inside surface of the (bed) rail and the compressed mattress. According to the clinical record, R26 is diagnosed with HEMIPLEGIA AND HEMIPARESIS (paralysis or severe loss of motor function on one side of the body) affecting the resident's left side, and osteoporosis (condition where bones…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-04-09 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the existing risk for entrapment of body parts through bed inspections, this failure created the potential for severe bodily injury including death by entrapment of body parts, for 3 of 35 residents [Resident #26 (R26), (R3) and (R13)]. In addition to the resident in immediate jeopardy, the facility's failure to implement an effective inspection of all resident bed equipment (bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails) to ensure that bed mattresses fit the bed frames to prevent entrapment of body parts, this has the potential to effect 35 out of 35 residents with bed rails. Findings: On 3/31/25, the facility's Bed Safety policy, undated, was reviewed. The policy indicated, to prevent deaths/injuries, maintenance staff would inspect all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment of body parts using the Bionix Bed System Measurement Device (Please see F689). 1. According to the clinical record, R26 is diagnosed with HEMIPLEGIA AND HEMIPARESIS (paralysis or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one person assist was provided during activities of daily living (ADL's) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #3), reviewed for falls. The failure to have supervision (one person assist) as directed by the care plan, and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, resulted in an avoidable accident; Resident #3 falling during evening ADL's, required transfer to the emergency room, sustained an abrasion and hematoma to the right hip causing an increase in pain and limited mobility. Findings: Review of Resident #3's Resident Incident Report, High View Manor dated 12/5/22 at 2:05 a.m., indicated that on 12/5/22 at 7:00 p.m., Resident was found on the floor by his/her bed laying on his/her right side. Resident stated he/she had finished washing himself/herself and fell to the floor hitting his/her back on the wastepaper basket, but did not hit his/her head. Resident complaining of severe pain to rt (right) hip area. Resident sent to ER (emergency room)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the building in good repair for 4 of 4 days of survey (3/31/25, 4/1/25, 4/2/25, and 4/3/25). Findings: On 3/31/25 at 11:22 a.m., a surveyor observed chipped paint around the room [ROOM NUMBER] placard, and the wall next to the nurse station door had a large un-painted area around a camera installation. On 4/1/25 at 8:08 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor and the Administrator, Resident #26's (R26) bathroom was observed. The bathroom had a large trash bag taped to the ceiling directing a steady leak of water into a trash barrel. Paint chips and insulation debris was observed in the standing water of the trash barrel. The Administrator stated it has been like that over the winter and will not be repaired until it is warmer outside. The Maintenance, Housekeeping, and Laundry Supervisor was able to redirect all the water into R26's bathroom (R26 does not use the bathroom). On 4/2/25 at 7:30 a.m., a surveyor observed the ceiling outside room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean manner on 4 of 4 days of survey (3/31/25, 4/1/25, 4/2/25, and 4/3/25), the facility failed to label thawed nutritional shakes with a thaw date on 1 of 4 days of survey. (3/31/25), the facility failed to discard expired foods on 1 of 4 days of survey (3/31/25), the facility failed to label, and date opened foods for 1 of 4 days of survey (3/31/25). In addition, the facility failed to consistently monitor and document food temperatures for proper cooked temperatures and proper serving temperatures for 94 of 99 meals reviewed. (Food Temperature Log sheets for March and 2 days in April) Findings: On 3/31/25 at 10:50 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen a surveyor observed the following areas that were not clean: Under the dish storage rack there was a seam in the linoleum flooring that was raised and had dirt buildup. Under the stove there was a seam in the linoleum flooring that was raised and had dirt buildup. The wall behind the stove was observed to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of an outbreak of Norovirus in the facility. In addition, based on review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Program and interview, the facility failed to fully develop and implement a water management program to monitor for and prevent the growth and spread of Legionella and other water-borne pathogens. Findings: The facility's policy, Reporting Communicable Diseases, revised 3/20/25, indicated that the Infection Preventionist is responsible for notifying the local, district, or state health department of confirmed cases of state-specific reportable diseases. The Maine CDC Notifiable diseases and Conditions List, dated 2/17/21, indicated that any cluster/outbreak of illness with potential public health significance needs to be reported. 1. On 3/31/25 at 10:15 a.m., the Administrator stated that the facility is experiencing what was thought to be an outbreak of Norovirus. On 3/31/25 at 3:59 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, record reviews, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations, and interview, the facility failed to offer the updated Pneumococcal vaccination to 3 of 5 residents (Resident #3 [R3], R22, and R29). Findings: The facility's policy, Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised 3/2025, indicated prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal vaccine series and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has completed the current recommended vaccine series. Assessments of Pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. Administration of the Pneumococcal vaccines are made in accordance with current CDC recommendations at the time of the vaccination. On 4/3/25 at 9:10 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Nurse Manager-Infection Preventionist stated she was unable to find information to indicate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to meet the reasonable needs of residents in the area of bed size for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs (Resident #13 [R13]) Finding: On 3/31/25 at 2:00 p.m., a surveyor spoke to R13, he/she stated that his/her bed is too short for them and was told by the facility they would get a bed to fit him/her. R13 stated that it has not happened. Observation of the bed shows there is a 3-inch gap from the end of the mattress to the footboard with a rolled-up blanket to fill the gap. R13 is over 6 feet tall and the mattress on the bed is not long enough leaving a gap at the foot of the mattress where his/her feet hang over the edge of the mattress. On 3/31/25 at 2:19 p.m., a surveyor confirmed this finding during an interview with the Maintenance/Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor and was told the facility has ordered R13 a longer mattress on this date.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #27, [R27]). Finding: On 4/2/25 during a review of R27's clinical record, a telephone order on 3/21/25 at 17:57 (5:57 p.m.) stated, Eliquis (a blood thinner) oral tablet 2.5 m.g (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to non-ST elevation MI (myocardial infarction [heart attack]) HOLD 3/22/25 06:00 a.m. - 3/24/25 14:00 (2:00 p.m.), Hold Date / Reason: procedure for wart removal on 3/24/25. Review of R27's medication administration record dated March 2025 stated, on 3/23/25 at 20:00 (8:00 p.m.) H (Hold). On 4/3/25 at 10:38 a.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the Registered Nurse (RN) gave Eliquis to R27 on the evening of 3/23/25 when it should have been held, and the RN only noticed the hold order when she went to chart medication given. A review of Resident/Facility Notification Form to the provider on 3/24/25 stated, Resident's (R27's) Eliquis was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, manufacturer's instructions, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy in a sanitary manner for 2 of 4 days of survey (2/10/25 and 2/11/25) for Resident #19 (R19). Finding: The manufacturer's instructions for Invacare Perfecto2 indicated that there is one cabinet filter located on the back of the cabinet; environmental conditions that may require more frequent inspection and cleaning of the filter include, but are not limited to: high dust, air pollutants, etc and to remove the filter and clean as needed. The facility's policy, Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)-Prevention of Infection, revised 3/2025, directed staff to wash filters from oxygen concentrators every seven days with soap and water. 1. On 4/01/25 at 10:21 a.m., a surveyor observed R19 wearing oxygen via nasal cannula and that the oxygen concentrator filter on the back of the machine was very dusty. 2. On 4/2/25 at 8:15 a.m., a surveyor observed that the oxygen concentrator filter on the back of the machine was very dusty. At 8:21 a.m., during an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify a resident's current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #5 [R5]). Finding: On 4/2/25 during a clinical record review for R5, it was noted that R5 had a diagnosis of PTSD listed as an active diagnosis. Review of R5's care plan updated on 2/19/25 lacked evidence that a trauma informed care plan was established to include triggers for this resident's PTSD diagnoses. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, Section I, Active Diagnoses, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder, I6100 was coded to indicate R5 had an active diagnosis for Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD). On 4/2/25 at approximately 1:30 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing the surveyor confirmed that R5 did not have a trauma informed care plan.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to ensure the plan of correction for identified deficiencies from the annual survey dated 5/1/24 was effective. Findings: At the annual recertification survey of 4/29/24 through 5/1/24, the following deficiencies were cited: F812, F880 and F883. During the annual recertification survey of 3/31/25 through 4/2/25, it was determined that F812, F880 and F883 would be cited again for the same issues: F812 was cited again for failure to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and failure to discard expired foods; F880 was cited again for failure to implement a water management program to monitor for and prevent the growth and spread of Legionella and other water-borne pathogens; and F883 was cited again for failure to offer the updated Pneumococcal vaccination to 3 of 5 residents. On 4/3/25 at 8:25 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor and the Administrator, repeat deficiencies were reviewed. The Administrator stated the plan of correction from the previous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's change of condition prior to transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 [R1]}. Findings: On 12/23/24, R1's clinical record was reviewed. 1. On 12/1/24, a staff member reported to Registered Nurse #1 (RN1) that R1 was not looking like [themselves]. Upon assessment by RN1, R1 was experiencing increased confusion with vital signs within normal limits. R1 was later found by a staff member attempting to eat a tea bag At 6:06 p.m., RN1 called 911 and prepared R1 for a hospital transfer, notifying R1's family member and giving report to the hospital. The clinical record lacked evidence of notifying the Medical Provider prior to this acute care facility transfer. 2. On 12/9/24 at 11:30 a.m., a stall remember reported to RN1 that R1 was not looking well and had slurred speech. Upon assessment by RN1, R1 was alert but unable to answer orientation questions with slurred words and was unable to understand what R1 was saying. Vital signs were within normal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,917 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $17,917 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-24 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $126K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME