Aroostook Health Center
15 Highland Ave, Mars Hill, ME 04758 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (207) 768-4915 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.2% | 24.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.9% | 2.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 11.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.6% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.4% | 17.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.8% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.8% | 20.2% | 17.1% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 1.45 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.89 | 2.01 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 47.9 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to promote care to residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity for 2 of 3 days of survey (12/15/25 and 12/16/25).On 12/15/2025 at 11:35 a.m., during an observation of the dining room meal service, 2 surveyors observed staff serve meals to residents. R2, R4, and R5 were observed sitting at 3 separate tables shared with other residents. At 11:46 a.m., all residents had been served a meal, except for R2, R4, and R5. At 11:47 a.m., during an interview with 2 surveyors, the Nurse Manager stated their trays come on another cart and they never know who is going to eat in the dining room. At 11:54 a.m., all residents were observed to have their meals. This finding was observed and confirmed with the Unit Manager at the time of the observation, and again during the exit conference.On 12/16/25 at approximately 8:15 a.m., during observation of the breakfast meal service, a surveyor observed that R18 was at a table without a meal, and R18's tablemates had their meals. A surveyor observed R21 sitting at another table and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was provided with written information, concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advanced directive, or appoint a surrogate, was completed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #1 [R1] and R3).Findings: 1. On 12/15/25, R1's clinical record was reviewed and indicated that R1 was admitted to the facility March 2024. On 12/16/25 at 12:30 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Social Worker stated on (or about) 10/2/25, all residents received a document, Acknowledgement of Important Information and Policies and that under the section for Advanced Directives - it was checked that I DO have an Advanced Directive and have provided the facility with a copy of the document. The Social Worker stated that there was no copy of an Advanced Directive in the clinical record found from March 2024 to now and he was unsure if this was incorrectly documented. He has reached out to R1's family member to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately maintain maintenance and housekeeping services necessary to maintain the facility in good repair and in a homelike environment on 3 of 3 days of survey (12/15/25, 12/16/25 and 12/17/25).Findings:On 12/15/25 at 8:45 a.m. upon entrance to the facility for their annual recertification, 3 surveyors observed the environment in a non-homelike environment with emergency light fixtures, call lights not being attached to the walls leaving visible wires. The thermostat near the front room did not have a cover on it. The wallpaper was removed leaving primed and unpainted surfaces throughout the hallways of the facility. In the charting area near station 1 nursing station the light switch did not have a cover. As the surveyors walked down the hallway it was observed that other areas did not have finished surfaces. The floors in the residents rooms were observed to have a build up of dirt and grime visible from the hallway.During resident interviews…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/bed hold notice to a resident and their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 2 of 4 sampled residents transferred/discharged to an acute care facility (Residents #1 [R1] and R33). In addition, the facility failed to notify (at least monthly) the Ombudsman office of transfer/discharges that have occurred since September 2025. Findings: The facility policy, Bed Holds and Returns, revised 3/2025, indicated that all residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: - notice 1: well in advance of any transfer (in the admission packet); and - notice 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours. 1. On 12/15/25, R1's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were followed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #14 [R14] and R39).On 12/16/25, R14's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the following:-Review of the Provider Orders included and active order dated 12/18/24, [Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)] to rule out possible gastric ulcer when [appointment (apt)] available.-On 12/17/24, a Provider's progress note indicated, [R14] requested to be seen today secondary to epigastric abdominal pain. [R14] reports several weeks of epigastric abdominal pain with excessive burping and decreased appetite with early [feeling of being full after eating (satiety)]. [R14] has a history of gastric ulcers and is concerned this has returned. [R14's] last upper endoscopy. showed several nonbleeding gastric ulcers. Given this history and [R14's] complaint of early satiety with abdominal pain, we will repeat an upper endoscopy. Referral to General Surgery will be placed. The provider also ordered a new medication for symptom control.-On 12/17/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations at least every 12 months for 4 of 5 sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant #1 [CNA1], CNA2, CNA3, and CNA4). Findings: 1. CNA1 was hired on 4/14/24. The last performance evaluation was completed for 4/14/24 - 9/30/24. The facility was unable to provide evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed between 10/1/24 - 9/30/25. 2. CNA2 was hired on 6/18/23. The last performance evaluation was completed for 10/1/23 - 9/30/24. The facility was unable to provide evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed between 10/1/24 - 9/30/25. 3. CNA3 was hired on 4/14/24. The last performance evaluation was completed for 4/14/24 - 9/30/24. The facility was unable to provide evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed between 10/1/24 - 9/30/25. 4. CNA4 was hired on 8/18/24. The last performance evaluation was completed for 8/18/24 - 11/15/24. The facility was unable to provide evidence that an annual performance evaluation was completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use in 1 of 3 medication storage rooms, and 1 of 2 medication storage refrigerators (Main medication storage room, and Main medication storage refrigerator), and the facility failed to monitor medication storage refrigerator temperatures to ensure proper refrigerator temperatures were maintained for medications, immunizations, and biological storage requiring refrigeration for 2 of 2 medication storage refrigerators (Main medication room-main medication storage refrigerator, and Station 1 medication room-Station 1 immunization storage refrigerator). Findings:1. On 12/16/25 at 10:10 a.m., during observations and review of the Main medication storage room with a Certified Nursing Assistant-Medications [CNA-M1], a surveyor observed and confirmed the following expired medications in the Main medication storage room and Main medication storage refrigerator available for use.-one container of Hemorrhoidal Hygiene Pads, with an expiration date of 9/2025.-one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections in the area of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), changing soiled gloves during/after patient care, and linen handling for 2 of 3 days of survey (12/16/25 and 12/17/25).Findings: The facility policy, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 3/2025, indicated that Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the transmission of multi-drug organisms (MDROs) to residents. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Gloves and gown are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity (as opposed to before entering the room). Examples of high-contact resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, antibiotic stewardship spreadsheet reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to implement its Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 2 of 3 months reviewed (October and November). This has the potential to affect all residents receiving an antibiotic.Finding:The facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic use and Outcomes, revised 3/2025, indicated that antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. - The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility wide-antibiotic stewardship.- As part of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the Infection Preventionist, or designee. -All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-17 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified staff member to function as the Infection Preventionist who was responsible for the facility's Infection Control Program and worked at least part time in the role since 10/8/25. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility.Finding: On 12/15/25 at 9:00 a.m., during an interview with 2 surveyors, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the Infection Preventionist (IP) position was an open position. On 12/17/2025 at 12:27 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the DON stated that she worked in the role of the DON fulltime. The previous IP left on 10/8/25 and that currently, she was the only staff member that had completed the proper IP training that was working in the facility. On 12/17/25 at 1:20 p.m., the Antibiotic Stewardship spreadsheet documentation was reviewed. This had not been updated since the previous IP left, with September being the last completed month documented. On 12/18/25 at 11:09 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator stated that part…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to implement a Comprehensive Care Plan that addressed the physical needs of 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Nutrition (Resident # 39 [R39]).On 12/15/25 at 9:28 a.m., a surveyor observed R39 in bed, eating breakfast independently and unmonitored.On 12/16/25 at 8:37 a.m., a surveyor observed R39 in bed, eating breakfast independently and unmonitored.On 12/16/25 at 12:07 p.m., a surveyor observed R39 in bed, eating lunch independently and unmonitored.On 12/16/25, record review indicated the following:-Review of provider orders indicated an active order dated 11/09/25, [Out of Bed (OOB)] for all meals with meals for choking risk, and a diet order dated 11/13/25, Regular texture, . OOB for all meals, Extra gravies for hydration and nutrition.-Review of the list of Residents for [Feeding Assistance (FA)], included R39. -Review of R39's Care Plan indicated a focus, I have a nutritional problem [related to (r/t)] my cognition, and [R39] has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem: Underweight related to likely inadequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated to reflect a resident's current needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident [R1]). Finding: On 12/15/25 at 9:35 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, R1 stated that staff were treating a sore on his/her tail end. R1's clinical record was reviewed and indicated a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], was coded under Section M210B to reflect that R1 had one stage II pressure ulcer. On 12/15/25, during a clinical record review, a surveyor was unable to find a FOCUS for a current pressure ulcer or enhanced barrier precautions (FOCUS or interventions), but the current physician orders contained active orders for a treatment for a pressure injury and enhanced barrier precautions. On 12/16/2025 at 12:30 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), a surveyor reviewed R1's care plan and noted that a care area for the pressure ulcer was updated yesterday (12/15/25) from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up on pharmacist recommendations and failed to keep all copies of Medication Reviews in the resident's clinical record for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #5, [R5]).Finding:On 12/17/25 at 11:00 a.m. during a review of R5's clinical record there was no evidence the facility followed up on pharmacist medication regimen recommendations. In R5's clinical record there was a note from the pharmacist that a review was done and to see recommendations. The clinical record lacked copies of these recommendations. During an interview and review of R5's clinical record with the Director of Nursing, she stated the pharmacist told her they failed to send all reviews for November At this time it was discovered that the October review was not in R5's clinical record and the recommendation was not reviewed and was not signed by the provider.The above finding was confirmed by the surveyor at the time of this interview.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from an unnecessary medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications [Resident #7 (R7)].On 12/17/25, a surveyor reviewed R7's clinical record. Review of active provider orders indicated:-An active order dated 6/25/25, LORazepam Tablet 0.5 [milligram (MG)] Give 0.5 mg by mouth one time a day for anxiety,-An active order dated 6/25/25, LORazepam Tablet 0.5 MG by 0.25 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety, and-An active order dated 12/4/25, LORazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 (Lorazepam) Give 0.5 mg by mouth one time a day for anxiety. On 12/17/2025 at 9:13 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor and the Director of Nursing (DON), R7's clinical record was reviewed. The DON stated the Lorazepam had a duplicate order, the order for Lorazepam 0.5 mg one time per day dated 6/25/25 should have been discontinued on 12/4/25 when the new order was placed. Review of the Medication Administration Record indicated R7 received an additional dose of Lorazepam related to the duplicate order on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not removing expired products from the available for use supply, ensuring refrigerators had thermometers for routine monitoring, and not ensuring that plumbing fixtures were properly installed to prevent backflow as required by the Maine State Plumbing Code for 1 of 3 days of survey (12/16/25). On 12/16/2025 at 11:51 a.m., during an observation of the Assisted Dining Room kitchenette, 2 surveyors observed and confirmed the following with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse:- 2 surveyors and the MDS nurse were unable to locate a thermometer in the refrigerator or freezer for routine monitoring.-The ice machine filter was observed to be heavily soiled with dust/debris. On 12/16/2025 at 12:07 p.m., during an observation of the Skilled Kitchenette, a surveyor observed and confirmed with the Director of Nursing (DON):-The refrigerator did not have a thermometer for routine monitoring.-1 open bottle, 60 fluid ounces Ocean Spray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that the Water Management Plan was fully developed/implemented to prevent the growth and spread of legionella and other water-borne pathogens, and failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to urinary catheter drainage bags for 2 of 3 residents reviewed with a foley catheter (Resident #38[R38], and [R4]). Findings: 1. On 10/16/24, the surveyor was provided with the facility's new Water Management Plan,, dated 9/19/23, for Northern Light Health Continuing Care. The surveyor reviewed this plan and requested documentation that indicated what areas were to be monitored where potential Legionella bacteria could grow, how the areas were monitored, and last time the facility had the water tested. On 10/17/24, the surveyor was provided with an updated Water Management Plan, dated 9/18/24, for Northern Light Health Continuing Care which included photographs of areas that were to be monitored where potential Legionella…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen equipment/dishware were stored in a sanitary manner by having mixing bowls and a colander wet stacked for 1 of 3 days of survey (10/15/24) and they failed to ensure that the correct 3 step process to manually wash, rinse and sanitize dishware was done correctly by failing to have sufficient concentration of the sanitizing solution in their 3 bay sink used to manually wash their dishware for 2 of 3 days of survey (10/15/24 and 10/16/24). In addition the facility failed to ensure that food was removed from use by the expiration date for 1 of 3 days (10/15/24). Findings: On 10/15/24 at 9:15 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, a surveyor observed water drops dripping from a mixing bowl. Upon further observation it was observed by the surveyor and the Kitchen Lead that 4-mixing bowls and a colander were wet stacked on the shelf above the food preparation area. This finding was confirmed by the surveyor with the Kitchen Lead at the time of the observation. On 10/15/24 at 10:00 a.m. an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician when residents were eligbile to receive the PCV20 (a vaccine that protects against Pneumococcal bacteria) and ensure residents were offered Pneumococcal vaccinations upon admission, annually, or in accordance with the Centers for Disease and Prevention Control (CDC) recommendations, for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #19 [R19], R33, and R14). Findings: The facility's policy, Immunization Screening for Pneumococcal, Influenza and/or COVID-19 Vaccination for Adult Patients, last revised 5/2/2023, indicated: Under the section: Screening for Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization - Long Term Care patients will be screened upon admission and annually thereafter. Under the section: Criteria for Eligibility, Pneumococcal Vaccine - Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria, the policy indicated that Northern Light Health offers PCV20 when either PCV15 or PCV20 is indicated and shared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, a facility staff failed to speak to residents in a manner that maintains and promotes each resident's dignity and respect for 1 of 3 days of survey (10/15/24). Findings: On 10/15/24 at 2:00 p.m., a surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA1) having a back-and-forth argument with Resident #1 (R1) during Bingo. CNA1 then turned her head away from R1 and continued to call Bingo letters/numbers to the residents playing Bingo while ignoring R1 while he/she was attempting to talk to CNA1. Another resident asked a question of CNA1, and CNA1 said, have some patience please [R15]. CNA1 was observed by a surveyor to be irritated and was speaking in a sharp voice to R15. On 10/15/24 at 2:18 p.m. in an interview with the Director of Nursing, a surveyor confirmed that R1 and R15 were not spoken to in a dignified manner when CNA1 argued with R1, ignored R1, and spoke sharply to R15.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), including a current diagnosis, and was updated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #29 [R29]). Finding: On 10/15/24, during review of R29's clinical record, contained a PASRR Level I Screen dated 4/25/24 has a letter attached that he/she does not have a reason for a level II assessment. The PASRR Level I Screen in the diagnosis section did not include a current diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). R29's current diagnosis list included a diagnosis of PTSD. The resident record lacked evidence that the PASRR Level I Screen was updated and resubmitted to include his/her diagnosis of PTSD and was not forwarded to the State-designated authority to determine if a Level II assessment was needed. On 10/16/24 at 2:45 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing, a review of R29's PASRR was done and a surveyor confirmed that his/her diagnosis of PTSD was not included on the PASRR for a level II determination.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to update a care plan to reflect a resident's current needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #19 [R19]). Findings: 1. On 10/15/24, R19's clinical record was reviewed. R19's current care plan last revised on 10/9/24, included a problem area of osteoporosis that was developed on 3/4/24, with an intervention Resident/Family/Caregiver teaching - Fall Prevention: Hold railing when using stairs. If unsteady on feet, use cane, walker, or have someone help you walk. Keep away from icy streets, sidewalks, wet/ waxed floors. Keep inside well lit at night. Remove things that could make you trip i.e. loose rugs or electrical cords. Wear low-heeled soft-soled shoes. Wear padded hip protectors to prevent hip fractures. On 10/16/24 at 12:05 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, Certified Nursing Assistant # 1 stated that R19 does not wear hip protectors. On 10/16/24 at 12:39 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, Clinical Supervisor (CS) stated that R19 does not wear hip protectors. CS and the surveyor reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess a residents current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/trauma to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 1 of 2 sampled resident's reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #16 [R16]). Finding: R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] to include a diagnosis of PTSD. On 10/17/24, a review of R16's clinical record, in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, Section I, Active Diagnoses, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder, I6100 was coded to indicate R16 has an active diagnosis for PTSD. The surveyor was unable to find information in the clinical record that indicates what R16's PTSD was caused by, what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization, and measures to avoid trigger(s) that might cause re-traumatization. On 10/17/24 at 11:13 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Clinical Supervisor stated she did not find a care plan (goal and trauma interventions) for PTSD other than it being mentioned as one of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure opened insulin and opened/activated inhaler was labeled with an open date in 1 of 3 medication/treatment carts (South wing). Findings: On 10/15/24 at 10:26 a.m., a surveyor and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) observed an opened Basaglar Kwik Pen (Lantus, insulin) for Resident #6 [R6] that was in the South wing medication cart that did not have an open or discard date (Lantus is good for 28 days once opened and at room temperature). On 10/15/24 at 10:30 a.m., a surveyor and LPN observed an opened Spiriva Respimat inhaler for R32 that was in the South wing medication cart that did not have an open or discard date (Spiriva Respimat inhaler, is good for 3 months after first use or when the locking mechanism is engaged, whichever comes first). On 10/15/24 at 10:54 a.m. , in an interview with LPN, a surveyor confirmed that the Basaglar Kwik Pen Lantus and the Spiriva Respimat inhaler were not labeled with an open or discard date. On 10/15/24 at 10:55 a.m., in an interview with the Clinical Supervisor, a surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to formulate an advanced directive regarding code status (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]) was accurate in the electronic record for (Resident #26 [R26] and [R295]) Findings: 1. On [DATE] at 1:40 p.m., a surveyor observed R26's medical chart read DNAR [Do Not Attempt Resuscitation]/Full Treatment on the spine. The record contained 2 POLST forms. Both POLST forms have the word Void written across the front and back. Review of R26's electronic medical record indicated a code status of DNAR /Full treatment (Do not provide CPR). The record also indicated Special Instructions: . FULL CODE (Provide CPR). On [DATE] at 1:45 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Registered Nurse (RN2) stated the code status of DNAR/Full Treatment means the resident would accept antibiotics and intravenous fluids but not CPR. On [DATE] at 1:48 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Clinical Supervisor stated the code status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide residents with oral care for 3 of 6 residents observed. Findings: On 10/3/24 during a complaint investigation, facility tour and anonymous resident interviews a surveyor observed and was told by residents that the facility is not offering or providing oral care daily. On 10/3/24 at 10:30 a.m. during an interview/observation with a resident who will remain anonymous it was observed that his/her dentures were not clean. They appeared to be caked with a white unknown substance the resident stated that the only concern he/she has it that they do not brush his/her teeth. He/she has false teeth and stated that every few days they may come in and take them to brush them, a lot of the girls don't like to touch false teeth they say if they take them, it will make them throw up and I can't do it myself, my hands will not hold them, and I don't want to drop them and break them. I would like them to be brushed every day the food gets stuck under my dentures and the taste in my mouth isn't always that good when they aren't'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist identified an irregularity for a psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident [R] 5). Finding: On 9/20/23, R5's clinical record was reviewed and it was noted that the resident was on an anti-psychotic medication, Olanzapine, with the last increase 9/26/20. R5's current care plan contained an intervention that was last revised on 8/27/19, to complete Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) testing per facility policy. The last AIMS test completed for R5 was done on 12/28/19. On 9/20/23 at 12:23 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that she spoke with pharmacy and the reason the pharmacist did not pick up the missing AIMS assessment was because the pharmacist was not checking for it. The DON stated that the AIMS test is supposed to be done every 6 months.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), used to monitor for potentially irreversible side effects of anti-psychotic medications, was completed every 6 months for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident [R] 5). Finding: On 9/20/23, R5's clinical record was reviewed and it was noted that the resident was on an anti-psychotic medication, Olanzapine, with the last increase 9/26/20. R5's current care plan contained an intervention that was last revised on 8/27/19, to complete AIMS testing per facility policy. The last AIMS test completed for R5 was done on 12/28/19. On 9/20/23 at 11:16 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Lead stated that there is no policy for the AIMS testing but that it should be done every 3 to 6 months. The surveyor confirmed that the AIMS test was not completed for R5.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0811 — patternEnsure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure paid feeding assistants are assisting only those residents without complicated feeding problems and who have been selected as eligible to receive these services from a paid feeding assistant for 2 of 3 breakfast meal observations (9/19/23 and 9/20/23). Finding: During entrance conference on the evening of 9/18/23 that was completed with the Administrator/Director of Nursing, a surveyor requested information on paid Feeding Assistants (FA) and a list of residents the FA could assist. On 9/19/23, this information was provided by the Administrator and reviewed by a surveyor. The surveyor also reviewed Resident (R) #23's clinical record which included diagnoses of Dysphagia, unspecified and Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction (stroke) and observed that R23 had a Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) evaluation completed 6/1/23 due to worsening symptoms. On 9/19/23 at approximately 8:50 a.m., a surveyor observed a staff member assisting R23 with eating while in the resident's room. On 9/19/23 at 9:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide Resident #13 (R13) with oral care on 2 of 3 morning observations. (9/19/23 and 9/21/23) Findings: On 9/19/23 at 08:13 a.m. during dining room observations R13 was brought to the dining room for breakfast. When surveyor attempted to interview resident, it was observed that his/her mouth care had not been completed. His/her mouth was noted to be covered in a sticky substance, his/her his lips were coated with a dried substance, and he/she was having a difficult time to talk (his/her tongue and lips sticking together). As surveyor was talking with R13 a staff person asked if him/her if they were thirsty. R13 stated he/she was very thirsty, and staff provided him/her a glass of water. A surveyor confirmed with staff that R13's mouth care had not been completed that morning prior to breakfast. The staff person then took the resident to their room to perform mouth care. When R13 came back to dining room he/she was then able to talk to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a physician order was followed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #5 [R5]). Finding: On 9/20/23, R5's clinical record was reviewed. The most recent order entered into the electronic clinical record for Trazodone was for 50 mg which was started on 3/23/23. On 8/22/23, the Physician signed a Pharmacist Consultant to Physician report that directed staff to trial Trazodone (anti-depressant) at 25 milligrams (mg) from the current 50 mg by checking the box Yes - Approve implementation of recommendation. Nursing please follow through. On 9/20/23 at 10:59 a.m., during an interview with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Lead, the surveyor confirmed that this order was not implemented as ordered.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide services to maintain and/or improve residents highest level of mobility. The facility failed to provide Restorative services as outlined in the resident's restorative care plan and [NAME] for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #3[R3]). Finding: On 9/19/23 at 8:43 a.m., during a resident interview, R3 stated that he/she has asked to ambulate and is supposed to walk everyday but when he/she asked they told him/her they didn't have time. During review of R3's restorative care plan with a revision date of 8/23/23, it has a focus area which documents I need to work with restorative nursing to help maintain strength, mobility and Range of Motion the goal is documented as I walk with restorative nursing to maintain the ability to ambulate 5-10 feet, 1 to 6 times a week. The intervention is documented as Ambulate with restorative nursing 5 to 20 feet with a 4 wheeled walker and follow me with a wheelchair. Review of R3's visual/bedside [NAME] report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOBSON, SAMUEL | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/30/2023 |
| BELL, CAROL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/02/2012 |
| DUNCAN, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/18/2016 |
| HERWEH, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/08/2018 |
| JOHNSON, HOLLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/07/2013 |
| ROARK, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/06/2020 |
| ST PIERRE, STEVE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/02/2012 |
| THOMPSON, BRYAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/06/2020 |
| TOWLE, JANE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/16/2017 |
| WILCOX, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/08/2018 |
| EASTERN MAINE HEALTHCARE SERVICES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/01/1987 |
| DENTRY, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205018. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.