Breakwater Commons
100 Commons Drive, Rockland, ME 04841 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (207) 301-6810 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $3,529 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-28)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 50.3% | 24.4% | 15.4% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.5% | 5.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 2.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 11.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 33.2% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.0% | 17.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.1% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.4% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.4% | 20.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.7% | 74.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.0% | 20.8% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.7% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.45 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.29 | 2.01 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 73.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.6%CMS range 51.0–71.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.2–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 73.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 69.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 87.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 3.2–9.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.74 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 90.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.42 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.02 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 3 of 3 units (East, [NAME] and South Units) and the laundry room for 3 of 3 facility tours/observations. (4/6/26, 4/7/26 and 4/9/26)Findings:1. East UnitOn 4/6/26 at 9:10 a.m., a surveyor observed a sit-to-stand patient lift by the central sitting area and a sit-to-stand patient lift by the nurse's station near resident room [ROOM NUMBER], that had food particles and debris in the foot base areas. Additionally, resident room [ROOM NUMBER] had a commode bucket on the floor in the bathroom.On 4/6/226 at 9:15 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, a Certified Nursing Assistant/Medication Technician (CNA/M) confirmed the finding. 2. On 4/9/26 from 8:05 a.m. to 8:45 a.m., a surveyor conducted an Environmental tour the Maintenance Director and the Housekeeping Director in which the following findings were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report, allegations of Abuse to the Division of Licensing and Certification (DLC) (State Survey Agency) 5 incidents of resident-to-resident abuse, 4 incidents of resident-to-staff abuse, 3 incidents of resident-to-staff abuse and 1 incident of resident-to-visitor abuse for 1 of 21 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey.Findings:Resident #61 was admitted 3/26 and has diagnoses to include Alzheimer's and Dementia.Review of Resident #61's clinical record revealed progress notes stating the following:3/11/26: 22:09 Resident was aggressive towards resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]B as [he/she] went up to [him/her] and slapped [him/her] in [his/her] face.3/11/26:26 14:07 Resident was aggressive with CNA's this afternoon, slapping one of them in the ribcage area .3/27/26: Resident was walking around in the common area and became very agitated with another resident that was yelling out loudly. [Resident #61] swung [his/her] arm and smacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer/discharge to resident/representatives, in addition the facility failed to provide written notice of bed hold to include cost of care and appeal rights to resident/representatives for 8 of 8 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents #1, #3, #7, #11, #54, #64, & #78).Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident 1's clinical record indicated that he/she was transferred to an acute hospital on 1/7/26 and 1/24/26. Further review of the clinical record revealed an incomplete Transfer and Discharge Notice. The notice lacked the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives appeal requests, and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request. The notice also lacked the name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Additionally, the notice indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #61).Findings:Review of Resident #61's clinical record revealed progress notes stating the following:3/4/26: CNA reported that resident took off the toilet tank cover and attempted to hit CNA with it. Resident then tore off towel bar .: 3/7/26: 23:35 Resident got upset when spoken to and defecated on the nurses chair and at the nurses station.3/7/26: 21:48 Resident slapped another resident from room [ROOM NUMBER] on [his/her] arms thinking that it was [his/her] wife .3/11/26: Resident was aggressive towards resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]B as [he/she] went up to [him/her] and slapped [him/her] in [his/her] face.3/11/26: 26 14:07 Resident was aggressive with CNA's this afternoon, slapping one of them in the ribcage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 14 of 21 residents reviewed for care planning (Residents #1, #3, #7, #9, #11, #15, #54, #64, #65, #68, #74, #78, #105, #108). Findings: 1.Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed a MDS Quarterly Assessment was completed on 11/4/25. Further review of Resident #1's clinical record lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days following the assessment. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed a MDS Quarterly Assessment was completed on 1/22/26. Further review of Resident #1's clinical record lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days following the assessment. 2. Review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed an MDS Annual Assessment was completed on 1/28/26. Further review of Resident #3's clinical record lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page of the Controlled Substances Book [a logbook used to record controlled medications], indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts, for 3 of 3 units observed (West Unit, South Unit, and East Unit).Findings:1. On 4/8/26 at 9:40 a.m., during a medication storage observation on the [NAME] Unit, a surveyor reviewed the Controlled Substances Book and Shift Counts located on the [NAME] Unit medication (med) cart, which indicated the facility counts at the change of each shift, approximately 3 times per day, and observed the following:- The person authorized to administer medications coming on duty failed to sign the Shift Count page of the Controlled Substances Book that indicated the controlled substances count was done on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a food slicer, a food mixer, a food disposal unit, fans, chemicals, a hood system, a stove, floors and kitchenette refrigerators/freezers; and failed to ensure foods in food bins, a reach-in freezer, a walk-in refrigerator and a walk-in freezer were dated, labeled and/or sealed; and failed to ensure that kitchen staff members with facial hair wore facial hair protection for 3 of 3 kitchen/kitchenettes tours. (4/6/26)Findings:1. On 4/6/26 from 8:05 a.m. to 8:35 a.m., a surveyor conducted an Initial Kitchen Tour in which the following findings were observed and shared with the cook:- The dry storage room had three large bags of cereal that were not dated. - A reach-in freezer had two packages of waffles that were not labeled and dated. - The walk-in refrigerator had a large bag of diced onions that was not labeled and a pan of beans that was not covered/sealed. - The walk-in freezer had a package of wraps that was not labeled and dated. - A large bin of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for neurological assessments (Resident #78 and #105) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #9). Findings: A review of the facilities Fall Management Policy Under Section V. subsection F states A neurological assessment tool will be for falls where there is a known head bump. A review of the facilities Neurological Assessment Policy states, Residents with suspected neurological compromise will have neurological signs monitored and recorded for a minimum of 12 hours. Further review of the policy under the procedure section states Neurological assessments following a residents head injury will be completed for all residents sustaining head trauma or suspected head trauma. In EMR (electronic medical record): Neuro checks will be conducted every 15 minutes X4, every 30 minutes X4, every 1 hour X4, every 4 hour X2, and every 8 hour X1. Frequency of neuro checks after 24 hours is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was provided with written information, concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an advanced directive, or appoint a surrogate, was completed for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident #15 and #78).Findings:1.Resident #15 was admitted 10/2025. A review of the entire electronic medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive.2. Resident #78 was admitted 1/2025. A review of the entire electronic medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) upon a residents death (Resident #97).Review of Resident 97's clinical record revealed he/she died in mid January of 2026. Review of Resident 97's Minimum Data Set (MDS) lacked evidence that a MDS was completed upon his/her death.During an interview on [DATE] at 2:15 p.m., the Director of Nursing reviewed Resident #97's clinical record and confirmed an MDS was not completed after resident died.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to the storage chemicals being properly secured for 2 of 2 observations for 1 of 4 days of survey. (4/6/26)Findings:The Safety Data Sheet for Febreze Air Effects Gain Original noted in Section 4:Eye Contact: Rinse immediately with plenty of water, also under the eyelids, for at least 15 minutes. Get medical attention immediately if irritation persists.Skin Contact: None under Normal Use.Ingestion: Not an expected route of exposure. If swallowed, clean mouth with water and afterwards drink plenty of water.Inhalation: None under Normal Use. On 4/6/26 at 9:40 a.m., a surveyor observed in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], two 8.8 ounce spray bottles of Febreze Air Effects Gain Original sitting on a shelf at the foot of the resident's bed.On 4/6/26 at 9:46 a.m., in an observation and interview with a surveyor, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to identify a resident's current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/trauma to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 1 of 3 sampled resident reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD. (Resident #74)Findings:Review of the facilities policy titled Trauma Informed Care developed in 10/2019 under section Purpose states Trauma-specific intervention(s) will be placed on the residents' care plan, and this will be reviewed quarterly and updated as necessary. A review of Resident #74's clinical record indicated he/she was admitted to the facility in 2023 with the diagnosis post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Further review of his/her clinical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 completed on 4/8/26 which showed, Section I, Active Diagnoses, Psychiatric/Mood Disorder, I6100 was coded to indicate Resident #74 had an active diagnosis for Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD). Review of Resident #74's Trauma Screen indicated that he/she has trauma related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately store controlled substances in a permanently affixed compartment for 2 of 3 medication refrigerators observed (West Unit medication refrigerator, South Unit medication refrigerator). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly in medication storage refrigerators on 3 of 3 units ( East Unit, [NAME] Unit, and South Unit).Findings:1. On 4/8/26 at 10:40 a.m. during an observation of the South Unit Medication Room, Certified Nursing Assistant Medication-Medication Tech (CNA-M) #2 accessed the locked medication room with her employee badge. Inside the unlocked refrigerator was an unaffixed plastic box with a handle, containing three 30 milliliter (mL) vials of lorazepam oral concentrate (a Schedule IV controlled medication).Additionally, the refrigerator was a dormitory-type refrigerator (a compact, combination refrigerator/freezer unit outfitted with one exterior door), which is not proper for storing medications due to temperature fluctuations. There was ice buildup in the freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2 Review of Center for Disease Control: Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) updated July 12, 2022 states Post clear signage on the door or wall outside of the resident room indicating the type of Precautions and required PPE (e.g., gown and gloves). For Enhanced Barrier Precautions, signage should also clearly indicate the high-contact resident care activities that require the use of gown and gloves. Make PPE, including gowns and gloves, available immediately outside of the resident room. Ensure access to alcohol-based hand rub in every resident room (ideally both inside and outside of the room). Position a trash can inside the resident room and near the exit for discarding PPE after removal, prior to exit of the room or before providing care for another resident in the same room. Review of facility provided Foley Catheter list revealed Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9 had indwelling foley catheters.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order to change an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley catheter) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters (Resident #1). Finding: Resident #1 has diagnoses to include benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate), retention of urine, urinary tract infection, and Foley catheter. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed a nursing progress note, dated 4/29/25, stating, Resident complained of pain with [his/her] foley catheter. Foley was not flowing. This nurse flushed foley with no relief. Foley catheter 16 french was changed out. Balloon filled with 10 cc [cubic cenimeters]. Resident stated relief from pain. No issues with the foley change. Resident tolerated well. 750 urine output. Further review of Resident #1's clinical record lacked evidence of a provider order for an as-needed (PRN) Foley catheter change. On 5/28/25 at 1:51 p.m., during an interview, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 stated she was unaware of the above Foley catheter change on 4/29/25. On 5/28/25 at 4:28 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters (Resident #1). Findings: 1. Resident #1 has diagnoses to include benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate), retention of urine, urinary tract infection, and indwelling urinary catheter (Foley catheter). Review of Resident #1's active physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 1/13/25 for, Intake and Output (I & O) 2 Times Daily . Review of the April and May 2025 Treatment Administration Records (TAR) revealed I & O is scheduled daily at 5:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Further review of the April 2025 and May 2025 TAR lacked documentation of intake and lacked evidence that output was recorded on the following dates: -4/1/25 at 5:00 a.m. -4/6/25 at 5:00 a.m. -4/8/25 at 5:00 a.m. -4/11/25 at 5:00 a.m. -4/27/25 at 6:00 p.m. -5/7/25 at 6:00 p.m. On 5/28/25 at 11:15 a.m., during an interview with 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure compliance with its Plan of Correction (POC) for F-842, related to intake and output (I & O) documentation resulting in inaccurate and incomplete documentation.During the revisit survey on 7/16/25, F-842 was recited related to incomplete intake and output (I & O) documentation. The facility POC indicated a date of correction date of 7/10/25 that included the following corrective actions: A house audit was performed by the unit managers of resident charts for residents with an order for I & O tracking. Educate nurse managers on documenting the facility order protocol inclusive of entering verbal provider orders into the clinical chart. Nurse managers/designee will conduct weekly audits for 60 days. Audit results will be reviewed in QAPI. On 7/16/25 a.m. at 2:00 pm during an interview with a surveyor, the above finding was confirmed with the Regional Quality Improvement Specialist.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for nursing staff in the areas of urinary catheter care, as part of the facility's follow-up to their facility reported incident dated 5/12/25. Additionally, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for nursing staff contracted through a staffing agency, in the areas of urinary catheter care and infection prevention, for 2 of 2 staff reviewed during an investigation of a facility-reported incident (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #2, #3). Findings: 1. The facility's 5-day follow-up, submitted to the state agency on 5/19/25, states, .The clinical coordinator will educate licensed staff on foley catheter policies and procedures . Upon entrance to the facility, the survey team requested evidence of the above education. A folder, containing educational materials titled, Flushing Urinary Catheters, Catheter Care Competency, Urinary Catheter or Urinary Tract Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the entire medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. 4. Resident #84 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the entire medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. 5. Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the entire medical record lacked evidence that the facility offered or reviewed with the resident and/or resident representatives or that the resident and/or resident representatives were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. 6. Resident #83 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 2 of 3 units (East and South) for 3 of 3 days of survey. Findings: East Unit: 1. On 1/21/25 at 11:28 a.m., observations of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s, shared bathroom with 2 basins stored on the floor under the sink. One of the basins had a commode bucket stored in it. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom had a wash basin on the floor with commode bucket stored inside of it. 2. On 1/22/25 at 8:41 a.m., observations of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom had a commode bucket on the floor with the basin stored inside of it. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom had a commode bucket stored on the floor. 3. On 1/23/25 from 8:13 a.m. to 8:21 a.m., the Surveyor and the Director of Nursing discussed the above observations and observed both rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]'s bathrooms with commode buckets stored on the floor. South Unit: 4. On 1/21/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed in the area of cardiac pacemaker (Resident #86, #83), hospice services (#243), respiratory needs (#54, #16) and psychoactive medications (#71) for 6 of 26 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings: 1. On 1/21/25 at 9:56 a.m., during an interview, Resident #86 stated he/she had a pacemaker placed about 1 year ago and is followed by cardiology. Review of Resident #86's medical record states he/she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome, chronic atrial fibrillation and nonrheumatic aortic insufficiency with the presence of cardiac pacemaker. The medical record lacked evidence that a comprehensive care plan had been developed in the area of a cardiac pacemaker. On 1/22/25 at 11:32 a.m., during an interview, the [NAME] President of Quality Improvement and Nursing Services the care plan lacks pacemaker. 2. Resident #83 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 8. Resident #71's medical record, surveyor noted two MDS Significant change assessments, dated 2/15/24 and 5/1/24 and two MDS Quarterly assessments dated 7/1/24 and 9/4/24. The clinical record lacked evidence that a care plan meeting was held by the IDT for the 2/15/24, 5/1/24, 7/1/24 and 9/4/24 assessments. On 1/23/25 at 1:41 p.m., the above finding was confirmed with the [NAME] President of Quality Improvement and Nursing Services 3. On 1/21/25 at 9:07 a.m., during an interview, Resident #90 stated he/she was not sure if he/she had an IDT meeting. Resident #90 was admitted on [DATE] and had an admission MDS completed on 1/1/25. The medical record lacks evidence that an IDT meeting, which included the participation of the resident and resident's representative, was held within 7 days of this assessment. On 1/21/25 at 2:29 p.m., during an interview, the [NAME] President of Quality Improvement and Nursing Services stated social services believes they had one on either the 7th or the 14th but they failed to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, facility policy, and manufacturer directions, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice in the area of nutrition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #60) and in the area of falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #79, #37). Additionally, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for medications located at a resident's bedside, for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #40, #70). Findings: 1. Review of manufacturer directions dated November 2024 states NovoLog is a rapid-acting insulin that helps lower mealtime blood sugar spikes in adults . with diabetes .NovoLog starts acting fast. Eat a meal within 5 to 10 minutes after taking it . Resident #60 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnosis to Diabetes Mellitus II. Review of Resident #60 active orders dated January 2025 reveled order with state date of 11/30/24 for Novolog U-100 Insulin; Aspart 100 unit/mL subcutaneous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On 1/21/25 at 9:15 a.m., 1/22/25 at 8:41 a.m., and on 1/23/25 at 8:21 a.m., observations of Resident #17's oxygen nasal cannula tubing dated 1/13 and an undated nebulizer pipe stored on the back of the nebulizer machine and the bedside dresser. Review of resident #17's medical record had providers orders dated 1/9/25 to Change Tubing 1 Time Weekly, Clean/Store oxygen tubing not in use 1 Time Weekly and provider orders dated 1/4/25 for ipratropium 0.5 mg (milligram)-albuterol 3 mg (2.5 mg base)/3 mL (milliliter) nebulization solution .Inhalation Three Times Daily. The most recent care plan for Impaired Respiratory secondary to Acute on Chronic Respiratory Failure, RLL (right lower lobe) Pneumonia, COPD AEB (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease acute exacerbation) need for hospitalization, respiratory medications/treatments and supplemental Oxygen with interventions of Change oxygen tubing weekly; label and date. Review of the January treatment administration records states the oxygen tubing was changed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use and failed to ensure that medications were stored properly as per manufacturers' recommendations for 3 of 5 medication/treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings: 1. On 1/22/25 at 7:30 a.m., observation of the South unit nurse treatment cart #2 with the Registered Nurse #2 (RN#2), the cart contained an opened and undated vail of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative with manufactures instructions of Store between 36 degrees - 46 degrees F and Once entered vial should be discarded after 30 days. At this time, RN#2 confirmed the Tuberculin vial was not labeled or stored correctly and immediately wasted the vial. 2. On 1/22/25 at 7:36 a.m., observation of the South unit medication cart with the Certified Medication Technician #1 (CNA-M #1), the cart contained an opened bottle of Acidophilus w/Pectin with the manufactures instructions to refrigerate after opening, one opened bottle of Famotidine 10mg (milligram) with an expiration date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure foods were dated and labeled in, stand up freezer, dry storage room and the walk in freezer. In addition, the facility failed to discard obvious freezer burned food on 1 of 3 survey days. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment during 1of 2 dining observations of meal service on 1 of 3 units. Findings: Review of policy Food Storage undated states . All containers must be legible and accurately labeled and dated .Leftover food will be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item will be clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Leftover food is used within 7 days (4 days or 96 hours per Maine regs) or discarded. During an initial kitchen tour with 2 surveyors and the Dietary Manger on 1/21/25 between 8:22 a.m. and 8:45 a.m., the following was observed: -Dry storage area: A rolled up unlabeled clear bag containing unknown brown crumbly substance with open date of 11/12 available for use. -Stand up freezer: Small undated blue squeezable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employee education record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and ensure that the CNA attended the required 12 hours of annual in-service education training for 5 of 5 randomly selected CNAs employed greater than 1 year (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #4, and CNA #5). Findings On 1/22/25, a surveyor reviewed the following employee education files: 1. CNA #1 was hired 12/5/1994. Review of CNA #1 Employee In-service/attendance Records lacked evidence that she completed the 12 hours of required continuing education for the year of 2024. 2. CNA #2 was hired 8/31/2020. Review of CNA #2 Employee In-service/attendance Records lacked evidence that she completed the 12 hours of required continuing education for the year of 2024. 3. CNA #3 was hired 3/18/2013. Review of CNA #3 Employee In-service/attendance Records lacked evidence that she completed the 12 hours of required continuing education for the year of 2024. 4. CNA #4 was hired 2/8/2021. Review of CNA #4 Employee In-service/attendance Records lacked evidence that she completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a medical provider and the resident's representative were notified of a significant change in medical condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for death (Resident #243). Finding: Upon review of Resident #243's clinical record, a hospice Discharge Summary dated 10/16/24 stated during a telephone call, the resident's representative reports anger with the facility that she was not notified of [Resident #243's] change in status from transitioning to active and was not given the opportunity to be present when [Resident #243] died. Review of all the Nursing notes from 10/2/24 through 10/5/24 included all of the following: Nursing note on 10/2/24 at 1:37 p.m. stated, Alert but not swallowing well and pocketing of food noted at lunch. [Doctor] notified. New orders received and noted to downgrade to puree texture diet. Notified [resident representative] of new order. Nursing note on 10/2/24 at 6:11 p.m. stated, Had eaten all of (his/her) mashed potatoes for lunch today, however at dinner resident has been holding puree…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Minimum Data Set, Version 3.0 (MDS) Significant Change in Status Assessment was completed within 14 days from the effective date of the Hospice election, for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospice (Resident#243). Finding: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, page 2-23 reads that a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election (which can be the same or later than the date of the hospice election statement, but not earlier than). A SCSA must be performed regardless of whether an assessment was recently conducted on the resident. This is to ensure a coordinated plan of care between the hospice and nursing home is in place. Resident #243's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the review of annual evaluations and interviews, the facility failed to complete a annual performance evaluation for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) at least every 12 months, for 1 of 5 CNA's reviewed with employment greater than 1 year. (CNA#4) Finding: CNA #4 was hired on 2/8/21. The employee lacked evidance of a annual preformance evaluaion being completed for 2024. On 1/23/25 at 11:32 a.m , during an interview, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services and Qaulity Improvement confirmed CNA #4 did not have a preformace evaluation on file for the year of 2024.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on an interview and review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, meeting attendance sheet and Power Points provided, the facility failed to present evidence that the required members attended 3 of 4 quarters provided. Finding: The facilities QAPI Plan under Governance and leadership states, The Administrator is responsible for the successful implementation of the QAPI Program through enforcement of scheduling and education to participants. On 1/22/25 at 11:37 a.m., during an interview with 3 surveyors present, the Administrator was only able to provide an attendance sheet for the 12/19/23 QAPI meeting stating, the previous Director of Nursing put the power point presentations together, and he thought she was taking attendance. He then stated the Medical Director at the time was not at the 3rd quarter QAPI. Review of the QAPI power points from Quarter 1 (4/23/24), Quarter 2 (7/23/24) and Quarter 3 (11/26/24) lacked evidence of the required member's attendance. In addition, the QAPI failed to include the infection preventionists for 4 of 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the development of infections related to Subcutaneous injected medication for 1 of 1 resident observed for subcutaneous medication administration (Resident #60). Finding: The facilities Injectable Medication Administration policy revised 1/2018, states under Purpose: To administer medications via subcutaneous .routes in a safe, accurate and effective manner and Equipment Required .Examination gloves The facilities Medication Administration - General Guidelines policy revised 1/2018, states under Administration . Hands are washed before putting on examination gloves and upon removal for administration of . injectable medications. On 1/22/25 at 7:20 a.m. during observation of Resident #60's medication administration with a Register Nurse #1(RN#1). The RN#1 prepared the Novolog Insulin for a subcutaneous injection and entered the resident's room, without performing hand hygiene and donning gloves, he immediately cleansed the residents right lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on immunization record review, review of the facility's immunization policy and interview, the facility failed to implement their Influenza, Pneumococcal, COVID policy for 1 of 5 residents whose immunization records were reviewed (#16) Finding: The facility's Immunization Policy indicated in Procedure I: Before offering the Influenza or Pneumococcal vaccine or COVID vaccine, each resident, and/or resident's legal representative will receive the appropriate Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) produced by the Maine and/or Federal Centers for Disease Control regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccines for the current year. The resident's clinical record will include the following documentation: Signature of the person receiving the educational material, designating receipt and understanding of the material. Verbal consent may also be obtained if communication is done via a telephone conversation. Proof the resident either received the Influenza, COVID and/or the Pneumococcal vaccine, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on immunization record review, review of the facility's immunization policy and interview, the facility failed to implement their Influenza, Pneumococcal, COVID policy for 1 of 5 residents whose immunization records were reviewed (#16) Finding: The facility's Immunization Policy indicated in Procedure I: Before offering the Influenza or Pneumococcal vaccine or COVID vaccine, each resident, and/or resident's legal representative will receive the appropriate Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) produced by the Maine and/or Federal Centers for Disease Control regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccines for the current year. The resident's clinical record will include the following documentation: Signature of the person receiving the educational material, designating receipt and understanding of the material. Verbal consent may also be obtained if communication is done via a telephone conversation. Proof the resident either received the Influenza, COVID and/or the Pneumococcal vaccine, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-12 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of the facility internal investigation reports, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 5 residents reviewed were treated with dignity and respect (#1, #4) . Findings: 1. On 10/21/24, the Division of Licensing and Certification received a facility reported incident. The report noted that a Resident #1 complained to his/her family member that there was a bar under him/her. The family member moved the bed linens and saw that a bedpan had been left underneath the resident. A review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and recent fractures of the left hip and humerus. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, admission Assessment, dated 10/17/24, noted in Section C0500, Cognitive Patterns, a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section GG0130, Self Care, Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toileting, lying to sitting, and sitting to standing for bed mobility. A review of the facility's internal investigation noted staff had failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not delivering food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 units observed during the noon meal service. (East unit) Finding: On 11/12/24 at 12:10 p.m., a surveyor observed the noon meal service on the East unit. A CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed carrying a tray with an uncovered plate of pot pie and an uncovered dessert down a hallway to a resident's room. The CNA returned to the serving line with the tray and stated the resident wanted a salad instead. The surveyor asked if meals were always delivered to residents in their rooms in this manner. The dietary aide stated meals were always delivered on trays this way. At this time, the surveyor observed several CNAs were present at the serving line. The surveyor asked if they knew the correct way the trays should be delivered. One CNA picked up a plate cover and placed it over the next meal tray's plate. The CNA who had delivered the uncovered tray asked the surveyor if all items were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 2 units reviewed during a complaint investigation (Memory). Findings: On 9/11/24 at 8:00 a.m., the Department of Licensing received an anonymous compliant indicating on 9/8/24 at 10:30 a.m., indicating on multiple times when [family member] has visited her mother/father in the morning, his/her room has been very cold. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include dementia, anxiety, depression, and is receiving Hospice services for end of life care and resided on the Memory Care unit. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 of 15 indicating he/she is not cognitively intact. During an interview with 2 surveyors on 9/26/24 at 10:30 a.m., Memory Care Unit Manager (UM) indicated a couple of weeks ago he/she came to work in the am and observed a resident coming out of his/ her room and they looked cold, UM went over to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, observations, and facility policy, the facility failed to update and include goals and interventions on the resident's current comprehensive care plan for the areas of falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2), incontinent care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3), and psychotropic medication use for 3 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation. Findings: Review of facility policy Psychoactive Medication Use Policy dated 9/18 states Psychoactive medications will only be used in conjunction with the Individual Care Plan . 1. Resident #1 has diagnoses to include hypertension (HTN), kidney disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression and is receiving Hospice for end of life care. Review of active medication orders dated September 2024 revealed Resident #1 was taking anti-anxiety medications Ativan and Lorazepam, antidepressant Sertraline, and antipsychotic Risperdal. Review of Resident #1 Care plan most recently reviewed on 9/24/24 revealed Mood: I have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to establish/implement their own grievance policy reviewed for 1 of 4 records reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #3). Findings: On 7/29/24 at 9:24 a.m., the Department of Licensing received a complaint indicating they filed a grievance on behalf of their family member (Resident #3) on 7/25/24 and did not receive a response for 30 days, even though [complainant] kept inquiring. Complainant further indicated [he/she] was informed the Grievance Officer was the Director of Nursing (DON) and the facility provided [him/her] with 2 different grievance policies, one policy states a response will be received in 15 days, and the other says they will respond in a reasonable amount of time, but they never told [him/her] what a reasonable amount of time was. Review of facility provided Grievance Policy dated 10/18 states The facility will ensure prompt resolution to all grievances, keeping the resident and resident representative informed through the investigation and resolution process. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Agency after a resident was found on the floor and bleeding from a head laceration for 1 of 4 complaint investigations reviewed (Resident #1). Findings: On 9/11/24 at 8:00 a.m., the Department of Licensing received a compliant indicating on 9/8/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #1, who is a high fall risk was left in his/her room unattended in a Broda chair and was found face down on the floor, sustaining head and right hand laceration requiring transfer to and acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment. Resident #1 has diagnoses to include dementia, anxiety, depression, is dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL)'s and is receiving Hospice services for end of life care. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 of 15 indicating he/she is not cognitively intact. Review of facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin after a resident was found on the floor, bleeding from a head laceration for 1 of 4 complaint investigations reviewed (Resident #1). Findings: On 9/11/24 at 8:00 a.m., the Department of Licensing received a compliant indicating on 9/8/24 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #1 who is a high fall risk was left in his/her room unattended in a Broda chair and was found face down on the floor, sustaining head and right hand laceration requiring transfer to and acute care hospital for evaluation and treatment. Resident #1 has diagnoses to include dementia, anxiety, depression, and is receiving Hospice services for end of life care. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 of 15 indicating he/she is not cognitively intact. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed that he/she is dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL)'s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for incontinent care (Resident #1). Findings: Resident #3 was originally admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include neurogenic bladder. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 of 15 indicating he/she is not cognitively intact. Further review of MDS revealed he/she is dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Review of Resident #3 Care plan initiated on 6/18/24 revealed Urinary Continence: I am incontinent of urine. I require your total assist for incontinence care.Check for incontinence at times such as before or after meals, HS, and prn; change if wet/soiled [minimum of 6 times daily]. Review of ADL Verification Worksheet dated July 2024 revealed Resident #3 received incontinent 1 (one) time on 7/10/24, 7/18/24, 7/24/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was accessible to 1 of 3 sampled residents observed for accommodation of needs. (Resident #3). Findings: Review of Facility assessment dated (4/5/24 currently under revision) states .Typed of Disease and Conditions: .Below is a list of common diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities .that require complex medical care and management that we commonly provide care .Vision: Cataracts, Glaucoma, Macular Degeneration, Blindness . Review of facility email dated 8/10/23 at 6:36 p.m. states .Subject: division for blind FYI: Finally made contact with Division of the blind for our visually impaired resident that has fallen outside and has ADA complaints The person is out next week for training but will be in the following week to map the building and outside . The facility did not provide any further information for this visit. Resident 3 was originally admitted to facility on 3/1/22 with diagnoses to include blindness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, the facility failed to notify the State Agency after two (2) falls that resulted in head injury. (Resident 1, and Resident 2.) Findings: 1. Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes myelitis, Heart failure, hypertension, aphasia, dementia, hemiplegia, and seizure disorder. On 11/2/24 Resident 1 was found on the floor in his/her room after an unwitnessed fall. Resident 1 was sent to the emergency room and subsequently admitted with a brain bleed. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident 1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 of 15 indicating he/she is not cognitively intact. Further review of MDS revealed Resident 1 had a history of falls and needs substantial assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed the following progress note dated 11/2/23 stating Resident was found face down on the floor by writer. Resident stated [he/she] fell off the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review and facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate two falls with head injury (Resident 1 and Resident 2). Findings: Review of facility policy Accidents/Incidents Involving Residents dated 12/14/21 states, Each incident or accident must be detailed in the medical record. This includes happening or experience which may be traumatic or inflict bodily injury to a resident . Each incident, accident . must be investigated immediately for determination of root cause. The DNS (or designee) will audit the system for completion/compliance . 1. Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes myelitis, Heart failure, hypertension, aphasia, dementia, hemiplegia, and seizure disorder. On 11/2/24 Resident 1 was found on the floor in his/her room after an unwitnessed fall. Resident 1 was sent to the emergency room and subsequently admitted with a brain bleed. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident 1 has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and policy review the facility failed to update/implement care plans in the area of falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident's 1 & 2) and in the area of psychotropic medication use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications (Resident 3). Findings: Review of facility policy Falls Management Policy dated 7/19 states .DNS or designee will review fall incident reports regularly and identify potential patterns or trends. Resident's care plan will be updated with all new interventions. Review of facility policy Psychoactive Medication Use Policy dated 9/18 states .A psychoactive drug is any medication affecting brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior . Psychoactive medications will only be used in conjunction with the Individual Care Plan. 1. Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, left sided hemiplegia, and seizure disorder. On 11/2/24 had an unwitnessed fall and was transferred to the emergency room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician and the resident representative of significant changes in the resident's condition in a timely manner for 1 of 1 sampled residents. (1#) Finding: On 3/13/24, a review of Resident #1's clinical record was completed. Resident #1's clinical record indicates he/she was hospitalized on [DATE] and diagnosed with a Hemorrhagic stroke. A Physician/Nurse Communication Tool dated 2/19/24 at 10:08 a.m. indicates Resident #1 had left sided weakness, slurring speech and drooping on the right side of his/her face. The blood sugar was noted to be 65 and Blood Pressure 196/90. Nursing progress notes on 2/19/24 at 10:57 a.m. indicate that Resident #1 had a low blood sugar of 65 before breakfast and was given juice, also noticed left sided weakness, slurry speech and facial drooping as well as incontinence of bladder, leaning to the left side, lethargy and confusion noted. Resident #1's blood pressure was noted to be 196/90. Resident #1 was given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition for 2 of 3 units(East Wing-100s and South Wing-200s) for 1 of 1 environmental tour. Findings: On 11/1/23 from 1:20 p.m. to 2:10 p.m., during a tour of the facility/resident rooms with the Environmental Services Director and the Maintenance Assistant, the following findings were observed: East Wing-100s > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There was a bedpan on the floor in the bathroom. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There were two (2) commode buckets on the floor in the bathroom. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There was a wash basin on the floor under the sink in the bathroom. > The sit-to-stand patient lift, in the hallway by room [ROOM NUMBER], had debris and dirt in the base area and the arm pads and frame were dusty/dirty. > Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There were two (2) commode buckets on the floor in the bathroom.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and the facility's Food Storage and Leftover Food Storage policy, Daily High-Temp Ware Wash checklist Policy, Daily High-Temp Ware Wash checklist Policy, and Refrigerator and Freezer Temperatures checklist Policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a food slicer and ceiling vents; failed to ensure all staff were wearing facial hair protectors; failed to ensure foods were labeled and/or in the dry storage room, reach-in refrigerator, the reach-in freezer, the walk-in refrigerator and the walk-in freezer for 1of 1 kitchen tour on 1 of 3 days of survey. (10/30/23). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure temperatures were monitored for the dish machine and the refrigerators/freezers for dates in August, September and October 2023. Findings: The facility's Food Storage and Leftover Food Storage policy noted: Procedure: 4. All containers must be legible and accurately labeled and dated. 7. c. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves if required by state regulation. d. Date marking to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and review of the Safety Data Sheets, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free from the potential risk of accidents when they failed to ensure that two chemicals were properly secured during 1 of 3 days of survey (10/30/23). Findings: 1. On 10/21/23 at 9:30 a.m., a surveyor observed a 19-ounce spray can of Lysol Disinfectant Spray and a jar of pumpkin spice scent crystal beads sitting on Resident #20's bedside table. The Safety Data Sheet for the Lysol Disinfectant Spray noted: Section 2. Hazards identification: Keep out of reach of children. Section 4. First Aid Measures: Eye Contact: Immediately flush with plenty of water, occasionally lifting the upper and lower eyelids. Check for and remove any contact lenses. Continue to rinse for at least 10 minutes. Get medical attention if irritation occurs. Inhalation: Remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. If not breathing, if breathing is irregular or if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance Committee failed to ensure that the plan of correction for an identified deficiency from the Annual Long Term Care Recertification survey dated 11/1/23 was followed and effective. The Federal citation F584 was cited again during the re-visit to the annual Long Term Care Recertification Survey, dated 12/7/23. Findings: During the annual Long Term Care Recertification survey, dated 10/30/23 through 11/1/23, a deficiency was cited at F584 for the failure to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition. The facility's POC, dated 11/18/23, indicated that the facility would be cleaned and repairs made to ensure that the building and equipment would be in good repair and in a sanitary condition, with plan of POC completion date of 12/1/23. On 12/7/23 at 11:55 a.m., in an exit interview with the Director of Nursing, she confirmed that the environment had not been brought into compliance as stated in the facility's Plan of Correction.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was implemented, for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for a hearing aids (#1). Findings: On 9/26/23 the surveyor reviewed Resident #1's current care plan. dated 9/5/23. under cognitive loss interventions noted: Attempt to remove hearing aid at night x1 and put on charger. If he/she refuses/resists, notify nurse to call [resident representative] Attempt to put hearing aid in x1 in morning. If [he/she] refuses/resists notify nurse to call [resident representative]. On 9/26/23 at 9:35 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #1 dressed for the day and resting in his/her bed. The resident was having a hard time hearing the surveyor. The surveyor observed a clear locked box secured to the night stand which contained a cell phone and a hearing aid charger with a hearing aid in the charger. On 9/26/23 at 10:00 a.m., in an interview, CNA #1 confirmed that she had not put the hearing aid in the Resident #1's ear or attempted to this morning. CNA #1 stated, I thought the night shift, who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart containing multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments and syringes was locked on 1 of 3 units. (Memory Care Unit) Finding: On 9/26/23 at 12:27 p.m., a surveyor observed an unlocked, unattended treatment cart for 3 minutes outside the Memory Care unit nurses station. There was no staff in sight. During this time, the surveyor was able to open all 3 of the treatment cart draws, all which contained multiple medicated creams, powders, ointments and syringes. At approximately 12:30 p.m., a Certified Nurses Assistant - Medication Technician (CNA-Med tech) returned to her locked medication cart. The surveyor asked the CNA-Med tech if the treatment cart should be locked? The CNA-Med tech stated It should be locked. It's the nurses cart today, and walked away from the treatment cart leaving it unlocked. At approximately 12:33 p.m. LPN #1 returned to the treatment cart and locked it. LPN #1 acknowledged that the treatment cart should have been locked. On 9/26/23 at approximately 3:10 p.m., a surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint investigation (Resident #3). Findings: Review of facility policy 48 Hour Baseline Care Plan dated 10/18 states A baseline care plan will be created within 48 hours of admission .Based on the admission assessment, physician orders and resident preferences a care plan will be created to facilitate a smooth transition of care and provide effective, person centered care. The Care Plan will contain the following 6 key elements: initial goals based on admission orders; all physician orders, including medications and administration schedule; dietary orders; therapy services to be provided; Social Service needs; PASRR recommendations (if any). Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include Diabetes Mellitus, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-11-01 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice, which included information regarding appeal rights and the name and address of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, to residents or their representatives for 2 of 3 sampled residents transferred/discharged by the facility to an acute care hospital (Residents #99 and #256). Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident 99's clinical record indicated that the resident was transferred was transferred to an acute care facility on 9/25/23 and 10/6/23. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility had provided a transfer/discharge notices to the resident and his/her representative. On 11/1/23 at 11:25 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the facility's Social Worker confirmed that a Transfer/Discharge Notice was not given to the resident or resident representative upon transfer to an acute care facility for either transfer. 2. Documentation in Resident 256's clinical record indicated that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 10/3/23. The clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-11-01 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to issue a bed hold notice in writing, or within 24 hours, to residents or their legal representatives, for 3 of 3 residents transferred to an acute care facility (#99, #202 and #256). Findings: 1. Documentation in Resident 99's clinical record indicated that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 9/25/23 and 10/6/23. The clinical record lacked evidence that the facility had provided a bed hold notices to the resident or his/her representative. On 11/01/23 at 2:15 p.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the social worker confirmed that bed hold notices were not provided for Resident #99's transfer to the hospital on 9/26/23 and 10/06/23. 2. Documentation in Resident 202's clinical record indicated that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 10/16/23. The clinical record contained a progress note indicating the bed hold notice was provided on 10/23/23 to Resident #202's representative. On 10/31/23 at 3:31 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the social worker confirmed that the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-11-01 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the current daily nurse staffing information that includes the facility name, and a breakdown of the number of hours of registered and unlicensed nursing staff responsible for direct resident care in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 3 of 3 survey days. (10/30/23, 10/31/23 & 11/1/23) Findings: On 10/30/23 at 10:00 a.m., during a facility tour, a surveyor observed that the nurse staffing information was not posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. On 10/31/23 at 9:30 a.m., during a facility tour, a surveyor observed that the nurse staffing information was not posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. On 10/31/23 at 10:41 a.m., in an interview, with the Administrator stated that the daily nurse staffing hours are not posted in the building since the facility opened on 7/19/23. On 11/1/23 at 4:45 p.m., during an exit interview, the above findings were discussed with the Administrator.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$3,529 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BREAKWATER COMMONS OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/01/2021 |
| BRESHNAHAN, RICHARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| CROSS, ROYCE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| HARSTAD, PAUL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| CHADWICK, CARL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| CYR, GLEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| ORESTIS, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| RICHARDS, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| TYLER, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/19/2023 |
| URY, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/19/2023 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205124. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.