Lakewood A Continuing Care Center
220 Kennedy Memorial Dr, Waterville, ME 04901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 105 certified beds · (207) 873-5125 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.3% | 24.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.0% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.0% | 2.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.9% | 11.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 34.7% | 25.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 17.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.0% | 29.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.9% | 20.2% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.2% | 74.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.1% | 20.8% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.9% | 16.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 1.45 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.21 | 2.01 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 104 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 34.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.2%CMS range 51.4–67.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.5–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 34.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 2.6–9.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-11 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Food Service Director (FSD) met the qualifications of a Certified Food Service Director. This had the potential to affect all the residents. Finding:On 12/9/25 at 9:16 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the FSD stated that she has been in this role for about ten months. She stated that she does not have the qualifications for the job and that she is currently not enrolled in any qualifying course or a Managerial Serve Safe course. She then stated the facility's dietician is on a consultant basis and comes in monthly. On 12/11/25 at 9:30 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator confirmed that the facility has failed to have a qualified Food Service Supervisor and uses a consultant dietician who is not employed by the facility in a full-time position.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 3 of 3 units (Skilled, Moonlight Bay and Long-Term Care) and a common area for 1 of 1 facility tour. Findings:On 12/10/2025 from 10:10 a.m. to 10:40 a.m., an Environmental Tour was conducted with a Maintenance worker and the Administrator in which the following findings were observed: Common area - The main lobby area, near the lobby desk and door to the outdoors, had cracked and lifted linoleum creating an uncleanable surface. - The activity/dayroom next to the lobby area had had cracked and lifted linoleum at first entrance threshold to the right after entering building creating an uncleanable surface. - The entrance, going toward the Skilled Unit and the entrance going toward the Moonlight Bay Unit, had linoleum that was lifted creating uncleanable surfaces. Skilled Unit- Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan that addressed the physical needs of 4 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #9 [R9], R2, R60 and R7).1. R9 was admitted in June 2024 with diagnoses to include chronic pain and bilateral hand and knee contractures. A review of R9's care plan, most recently revised on 10/22/25 states, The resident is (SPECIFY High, Moderate, Low) risk for falls r/t [related to] Gait/balance problems. and lacked evidence that the care plan was accurately revised to reflect R9's current fall risk status. Further review of the care plan indicated a focus of .acute on chronic pain as it relates to my fibromyalgia, contractures, and functional deficits. and interventions included, .Identify, record, and treat the resident's existing conditions which may increase pain.(SPECIFY: arthritis, neuropathies, cancer, osteoporosis, fractures, shingles, peripheral vascular disease, ulcers, contractures, parathesia [paresthesia] r/t…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for a physical therapy evaluation for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility, for diet orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed and for medication orders for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #9 [R9] R60, R56 and R10).Findings: 1.R9 has diagnoses to include hemiplegia, muscle spasticity, and bilateral hand and knee contractures. A review of R9's provider progress note dated 9/26/25 states, .consult for spasticity.the patient is seated in [his/her] wheelchair leaning to the right. A review of R9's SBAR communication form (a form used by nurses to communicate resident needs with a physician) dated 10/29/25 states, May we have an order for resident to use seatbelt while in w/c [wheelchair]. with a written physician order at the bottom of the form for .PT/OT [physical therapy/occupational therapy] eval [evaluation] trunk stability. Further review of the form indicates sent to therapy. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (Resident #49 [R49], R41) and 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration (R52).Findings:1. A review of R49's care plan indicates he/she .has an ADL [activities of daily living] self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] Hemiplegia.often lethargic on bath days.Notify nurse and perform full bed bath instead.A review of R49's bathing task documentation in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicates whirlpool or shower and document every Wednesday day shift and prn [as needed]. Further review of the task documentation states, Specify Bathing given and is documented as Not Applicable by Certified Nursing Assistant #3 (CNA3) on 12/3/25. Further review of the EMR lacks evidence of a nursing progress note or documentation indicating why R49 did not receive his/her scheduled bath/shower.On 12/11/25 at 8:38 a.m. during an interview, CNA3 stated she only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 3 of the 4 days of survey (12/8/25, 12/9/25 and 12/11/25).1. On 12/8/25 at 1:47 p.m., during an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP), a surveyor observed the following: Contact Precaution Signage was observed on the wall to left and right of room [ROOM NUMBER]. A Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) cart was observed to the left of the door containing masks, gowns, and gloves. A housekeeping cart was observed in the hallway outside the resident room. The IP stated that the Contact Precautions were for COVID. During the observation of the signage and PPE, the door to room [ROOM NUMBER] opened and a housekeeping staff exited the room leaving the door open. The Housekeeping staff discarded a simple mask, performed hand hygiene, donned a simple mask from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered pneumococcal vaccinations in accordance with the Centers for Disease and Prevention Control (CDC) recommendations for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #7 [R7] and R8).On 12/9/25, the Facility's Policy Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised 03/2025, was reviewed. The policy stated, 1. Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility . 2. Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission.On 12/10/25, from 9:20 - 10:00 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor and the Infection Preventionist (IP), the following was reviewed and confirmed:R7 was admitted on [DATE]. R7's paper chart contained a Prevnar20 Consent Form that was signed by the resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to perform adequate screening and documentation for the updated coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccine as required for 4 out of 5 residents screened for Covid-19 immunizations (Resident #7 [R7], R8, R71, and R85).On 12/10/25, from 9:20 - 10:00 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor and the Infection Preventionist (IP), the following was reviewed and confirmed:R7 was admitted on [DATE]. The clinical record lacks evidence that R7 was offered the updated COVID-19 vaccination or signed informed consent and/or declination for the updated Covid-19 immunization.R8 was admitted on [DATE]. The clinical record lacks evidence that R8 was offered the updated COVID-19 vaccination or signed informed consent and/or declination for the updated Covid-19 immunization.R71 was admitted on [DATE]. The clinical record lacks evidence that R71 was offered the updated COVID-19 vaccination or signed informed consent and/or declination for the updated Covid-19 immunization.R85 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employee education review and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program to ensure that a CNA attended the required 12 hours of annual in-service education training, and annual dementia training for 3 of 5 randomly selected CNAs reviewed on survey (CNA4. CNA-M3 and CNA-M4).Findings:1.On 12/11/25, review of CNA4's employee record indicated the date of hire to be 1/17/21. The education file lacked evidence of annual education in the areas of Dementia training, communication, behavioral health and ethics, 2.On 12/11/25, review of CNA-M3's employee record indicated the date of hire to be 1/2/1983. The education file lacked evidence of annual education in the areas of Dementia training, communication, behavioral health and ethics.3.On 12/11/25, review of CNA-M4's employee record indicated the date of hire to be 1/17/21. The education file lacked evidence of annual education in the areas of Dementia training, communication, behavioral health and ethics, On 12/11/25 at 9:37 a.m. during an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner that maintains each resident's dignity and respect when staff failed to serve all residents seated at the same table at the same time for 1 of 3 meals and observed staff standing while assisting residents with their lunch meal. (12/8/25)Findings:On 12/8/25 on the Moonlight Bay unit during the lunch meal observation between 12:00 p.m. and 12:36 p.m., at 12:08 p.m. the surveyor observed 2 residents sitting at the far table nearest the window cutout were being assisted with their meals while their 2 table mates sitting across from them were not being assisted. The tablemates were not served and assisted with their meals until 12:24 p.m. This observation was confirmed by the surveyor with a corporate consultant at the time of the observation.On 12/8/25 at 12:13 p.m. during the above meal observation a Certified Nursing Assistant (Cna) was observed standing while assisting two residents with their lunch meals. The charge nurse was made aware and stated she was not aware that staff could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice and a bed hold notice to include cost of care to the legal representative for 2 of 3 sampled resident reviewed for transfer to an acute care hospital. (Residents #82, #2 [R82, R2]).Findings: Resident #82 was originally admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses to include Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of Resident #82's complete clinical record revealed he/she was transported to an acute care hospital and subsequently admitted on [DATE]. Further review of Resident #82's clinical record lacked evidence that the resident representative received a written transfer/discharge notice and a written bed hold notice. On 12/10/25 at 9:36 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Nurse Manager for the Long Term Care unit confirmed that a written transfer/discharge notice and a bed hold notice were not provided to the resident representative in writing for the above-named date. On 12/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician supervised and evaluated weight loss for 1 of 5 residents reviewed with potentially significant weight loss (Resident #7 [R7]). On 12/8/25, R7's clinical record was reviewed and revealed the following:-Review of documented weights indicated R7's weight on 10/29/25 was 119.8 pounds, R7's weight on 11/28/25 was 112.2 pounds, which is a -6.34% weight loss in 1 month.-Review of R7's brief interview for mental status dated 12/5/25, indicated R7 has moderate cognitive impairment. -Review of the Provider's Progress Note dated 12/5/25 indicated R7 denied weight loss. The progress note lacked evidence that the potentially significant weight loss was identified or addressed. On 12/9/25 at 3:03 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and the Unit Manager (UM), R7's clinical record was reviewed. The LPN stated if a resident has weight loss, staff will tell the provider first, and they would try a nutritional supplement such as Ensure or Glucerna. Then we will do weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Shift Count page indicating that they counted all controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts, for 2 of 6 Controlled Substances Books reviewed (Long Term Care House 5/6 [LTC House 5/6] and LTC House 7/8 Medication Tech med cart books).Findings:1. On 12/9/25 at 10:27 a.m., during a medication storage observation, Controlled Substances Book and Shift Counts for the LTC House 5/6 medication tech med cart were reviewed, which indicated the facility counts at the change of each shift, approximately 2 times per day, and revealed the following:- The person authorized to administer medications coming on duty failed to sign the Shift Count page of the Controlled Substances Book that indicated the controlled substances count was done on the following dates: 4/14/25 at 5:30 a.m., 6/22/25 at 2:30 p.m., 6/27/25 at 11:00 p.m., and 7/15/25 at 11:00 p.m.- The person authorized to administer medications going off duty failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the supply available for use for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed (Long Term Care [LTC] House med storage room). Finding:On 12/10/25 at 9:00 a.m. during an observation of the LTC House med storage room with the LTC Unit Manager, a bottle of Lido-Nystatin 50/50 (a medication commonly known as Magic Mouthwash) labeled for R74 with a written date of 10/8/24 and an expiration date of 10/8/25, was available for use. At this time, the surveyor confirmed the finding with the LTC House Unit Manager, and the unit manager discarded the expired medication.On 12/10/25 at 3:45 p.m., the finding was discussed with the Director of Nursing.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and the facility's Food Storage, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a dish machine, metal shelving and the floor; and failed to ensure foods were sealed, labeled, dated and/or discarded if past use by date in a walk-in refrigerator for 1 of 1 kitchen tours. (12/8/25) Findings: The facility's Food Storage policy effective 03/2025 noted: All foods must be covered, labeled, dated and routinely monitored to assure foods are used by their use by dates or discarded. On 12/8/25 from 10:45 a.m. to 11:20 a.m., a surveyor completed a kitchen tour with the facility Food Service Director and a Food Service Director from a sister facility, in which the following findings were observed:-The dish machine had large amounts of food debris, dried liquid residue and dried chemical residue on the top and sides of it. -The metal shelf under the hot water booster was rusty. -There was a one pound box of corn starch on a kitchen shelf that was open to the air and not sealed.-There was food debris and dirt on the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services or obtain the required services from an outside resource that is a provider of specialized rehabilitative services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for rehabilitative services (Resident #7 [R7]).On 12/9/25, review of R7's clinical record indicated the following:-R7 had a diagnoses included a left femur fracture with routine healing.-Review of Physician's Telephone Orders, signed on 11/5/25, indicated and order to Continue current [Physical Therapy (PT)]/[Occupational Therapy (OT)]/[Speech Therapy(ST)] [Plan of Care (POC)] under new therapy provider, Reliant Rehabilitation, effective 11/01/25.-Review of the Order Summary Report indicated an active order to Continue current PT/OT/ST POC under new therapy provider Reliant Rehab, effective 11/1/25 and an active order clarifying Physical Therapy to see R7, 5 times per week.-Review of the Care Plan was not updated to address R7's physical needs related to a femur fracture (See F657).The surveyor was unable to find therapy documentation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility Reportable Incident Form, record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify timely the Medical Provider of an unwitnessed fall with head injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who sustained a head injury from a fall (Resident #1 [R1]).On 11/18/25, the facility's Reportable Incident Form that was sent to Licensing and Certification, dated 11/10/25, was reviewed. Documentation on the form indicated that on 11/7/25 at approximately 11:00 p.m., R1 had an unwitnessed fall in his/her room. From the fall, R1 sustained an injury to the left forehead, a black eye on the right periorbital, a skin tear to the right upper lip and a skin tear to the left wrist.A review of the clinical record indicated that on 11/7/25 the Charge Nurse/Registered Nurse (RN1) who assessed R1 after the fall filled out a Risk Management Form. RN1 documented a message containing information regarding the fall on the Risk Management Form for the Medical Provider to review at his/her next visit. The Provider reviewed the message and visited R1 on 11/10/25.On 11/18/25 at 11:26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the Reportable Incident Form, the facility policy and procedure for reporting and interviews, the facility failed to notify the State Agency (Division of Licensing and Certification) of an unwitnessed fall with head injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed that sustained a head injury from a fall.On 11/18/25, the facility's Reportable Incident Form that was sent to Licensing and Certification, dated 11/10/25, was reviewed. Documentation on the form indicated that on 11/7/25 at approximately 11:00 p.m., R1 had an unwitnessed fall in his/her room. From the fall, R1 sustained an injury to the left forehead, a black eye on the right periorbital, a skin tear to the right upper lip and a skin tear to the left wrist.A review of the facility's reporting a fall with injury policy and procedure indicated under Section: To state and federal agencies: Falls with serious injury must be reported to the stated survey agency within 24 hours.On 11/18/25 at 11:26 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, RN1 confirmed that he did not notify the Division of Licensing and Certification of the fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 3 of 3 units (the Skilled Unit, the Long-Term Care Unit and the Memory Care Unit) for 1 of 1 facility tour. Findings: On 11/14/24 from 9:15 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., two surveyors conducted an Environmental tour with the Facilities Director in which the following findings were observed: > Activity Room by front entrance - the ceiling, in the far-left corner of the room, had an area hanging down exposing sheetrock. There were multiple floor seams that were held down with black tape. > The skilled unit common area had a blue manual sit-to-stand lift and a mechanical Sara Plus sit-to-stand lift that had dirt/debris in the foot base areas; and had a manual sit-to-stand lift that had a foot base that had ripped/torn non-skid tape and chipped/peeling paint on the base and legs creating uncleanable surfaces. > Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the facility's policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Agency after an allegation of potential neglect concerns were identified, failed to investigate an unwitnessed fall resulting in a major injury, and failed to ensure that the facility's investigation was sent to the State Agency within 5 business days of the incident for 2 of 4 complaint investigations reviewed during an annual survey. Findings: A review of the facility's policy, Policy/Procedure #23-007, Reporting and Investigating Compliance Concerns, Section B. Investigations, states, Any alleged violation will be acted upon promptly by the individual receiving a report of non-compliance from a Workforce Member . A review of the facility's policy, Policy/Procedure #004, Resident Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation, states, Section III. Reporting and Procedures .7. A Nursing Facility Reportable Incident Form will be completed, and written documentation of action taken shall be maintained. 8. The Administrator, Director of Nursing, or designee will report all incidents of actual or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were followed for 1 of 2 Resident's reviewed for oxygen. (Resident #3) Additionally, the facility failed to follow recommendations given by Physical Therapy (PT) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for restorative care (Resident #87). Findings: 1. On 11/12/24 during Resident #3's clinical record review, Resident #3 had a current physician order filed in the paper record and scanned into the electronic record dated 8/26/24 that noted: O2 [oxygen] therapy cont[continuous]/daily 4L[liters] via Nasal Canula q [every] shift am [morning] pm [evening] NOC [night] - 8/26/24. On 11/12/24 at 11:20 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #3's oxygen concentrator set at 3 liters. On 11/13/24 at 9:00 a.m., a surveyor observed Resident #3's oxygen concentrator set at 3 liters. On 11/13/24 at 3:20 p.m., a surveyor and the Director of Nursing [DON] reviewed Resident #3's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for oxygen administration and found documentation from September 6, 2024 to November 13, 2024 that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to respiratory care for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident # 5, #23, #49, #3, #13). Findings: 1. On 11/12/24 at 9:15 a.m. and on 11/13/24 at 7:42 a.m., Observation of Resident #5's nebulizer mask unlabled and stored on their bedside table. 2. On 11/12/24 at 10:00 a.m. and on 11/13/24 at 9:00 a.m., observation of Resident #23's nasal cannula tubing unlabeled and stored on their bedside table. 3. On 11/13/24 at 8:20 a.m., 2 surveyors observed Resident #49 nasal cannula tubing unlabeled and stored on a wheelchair in the hallway. On 11/13/24 at 9:12 a.m., the above was confirmed by the Director of Nursing. 4. On 11/12/24 at 11:28 a.m., during an observation of Resident 3's bathroom, 2 surveyors noted a currently being used oxygen concentrator with the oxygen tubing for the concentrator taped to the floor across the room that had two (2) filters that were heavily built up with dust. On 11/13/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to properly store medications and biologicals in medication refrigerators, treatment carts and medication carts for 3 out of 3 units surveyed for medication storage. Findings: 1. Record review of the facility policy #PHARM903 states: All drugs shall be stored at appropriate temperatures that do not exceed manufacturer's recommendations or warnings. Refrigerator: A cold place in which the temperature is held between 36F and 46F. On 11/13/24 at 10:02 a.m. a surveyor observed the medication room for the long-term care unit with the Administrator and found the following: The refrigerator was a dorm style unit with a freezer compartment which is inappropriate for storing medications due to temperature fluctuations. Thermometers located under the freezer and in the lower drawer showed a 10 degree Farenheit difference in temperatures. Significant ice buildup in the freezer and pools of water on the top shelf with 3 medications in the water including a plastic bag containing a Spice Vax vaccination. Two boxes with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for fans, ceiling vents, and ceiling lights and failed to ensure that the kitchen ice machine and the skilled unit ice machine were plumbed in accordance with code requirements to prevent food contamination for 2 of 2 tours. Findings: This direct connection of waste water and potable water was in violation of the 10-114 State of Maine Rules Chapter 226, definition Section A, which defines an Air-Gap Separation - A physical separation between the free-flowing discharge end of a potable water supply pipeline and an open or non-pressure receiving vessel. An air-gap separation shall be at least twice the diameter of the supply pipe measured vertically above the overflow rim of the vessel - in no case less than one inch (2.54 cm) and the Code of Federal Regulation, Title 21, Part 1250, Section 1250, 30 (d) states all plumbing shall be so designed, installed, and maintained as to prevent contamination of the water supply, food, and food utensils. 1. On 11/12/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's choice in the area of bathing and hygiene were being followed for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #37). Findings: On 11/12/24 at 9:10 a.m., observation of Resident #37 lying in bed with a splint on his/her right hand. His/her face was unshaven with flakey skin around his/her scalp. During an interview, Resident #37 stated, Tuesdays is his/her whirlpool bath day and Since I hurt myself .I haven't gotten it for a few weeks. It's usually a whirlpool bath. The surveyor asked if he/she can shave him/herself. Resident stated, Before I hurt myself, I've been waiting for over a week. I'm right-handed, with this especially, showing the surveyor his/her right hand in the splint. The resident confirmed the split is always in place and he/she would like his/her face shaved. The surveyor then asked if he/she had asked the staff to help. He/she stated, yes, but they are always busy. At this time the Registered Nurse #3 (RN #3) entered the room. Resident #37 asked the RN #3 about his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the Nursing Facility Reportable Incident submitted to the Division of Licensing and Certification on 10/21/24, the facility's internal investigation, written statements by staff, facility policy, clinical record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical and emotional abuse by staff when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) forcibly dressed and transferred a resident. (Resident #70) Findings: The incident on 10/21/24 came to the attention of DHHS-DLC in a facility reported incident dated 10/21/24 alleging that CNA #1 was abusive towards Resident #70. A surveyor reviewed the facility policy Resident Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation stated that Abuse is The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Resident #70's medical records showed diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, depression,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to the storage of chemicals being properly secured for 2 of 2 observations for 2 of 3 days of survey. (11/12/24 and 11/13/24) Findings: The Safety Data Sheet for Clorox Healthcare Hydrogen Peroxide Cleaner Disinfectant Wipes noted the following: 4. First Aid Measures General advice: Show this safety data sheet to the doctor in attendance. Eye contact: Rinse thoroughly with water as necessary. Get medical attention if irritation develops and persists. Skin contact: Wash skin with soap and water. Give medical attention if irritation develops and persists. Inhalation: If symptoms develop move victim to fresh air. If breathing is difficult, [trained personnel should] give oxygen. If symptoms persist, call a physician. Ingestion: Drink 1 to 2 glasses of water. Get medical attention if symptoms occur. On 11/12/24 at 10:38 a.m., during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient direct care staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of residents that reside on the Long Term Care Unit. This has the potential to affect all residents needing assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL)'s. (Resident #4, #45, and #87). Findings: 1.On 11/12/24 at 10:13 a.m., Resident #4 stated, staff take between 30 mintues to 1 hours for staff to answer his/her call bell. In an attitional interview on 11/13/24 at 1:20 p.m. Resident #4 stated that he/she believed waiting over 20 minutes for staff to respond to a call bell is too long. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 of 15, indicating he/she is cognitively intact. Record review of the Individual Account Report from 11/5/24 through 11/12/24 states Resident #4 waited approximately 25 minutes to 1 hour and 18 minutes 10 times. 2. On 11/12/24 at 8:51 a.m., Resident #45 states the unit is often short staffed, taking up to 1 hour for staff to answer his/her call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control procedures related to hand hygiene during 1 of 2 medication pass observations. Review of Policy/Procedure #31-202, Hand Hygiene Program for Northern Light Member Organizations that Provide Clinical Patient Care, states, .Hand Hygiene is to occur: 1. Before touching a patient .The use of gloves does not replace Hand Hygiene .Hand Hygiene shall occur prior to donning gloves and after doffing gloves . During a medication pass observation on the Memory Lane unit on 11/14/24 between 11:30 a.m. and 11:38 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) #2 was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], checking Resident #61's blood sugar, with gloved hands. RN #2 was observed exiting room [ROOM NUMBER] with gloved hands and walking to the medication cart located outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN #2 doffed (removed) her gloves and placed them in the trash bin hanging on the side of the medication cart. Without using the hand sanitizer observed on top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was functional for 1 of 20 sampled residents (#37). Finding; On 11/12/24 at 9:10 a.m. during an interview, Resident #37 stated his/her call bell has not been working and they said they fixed it. At this time, the surveyor pushed the call bell, the light above the door did not illuminate. The surveyor then went to the nurse's station and checked the call bell screen and asked the Registered Nurse (RN#3) if the call bell screen shows active call bells. RN#3 stated if it's highlighted red is an active call bell. Resident #37's room had no indication of the call bell being activated. Both the Surveyor and RN #3 went to resident #37's room. A Certified Nurses Aid also entered the room and stated the call bell was not working. At this time the Minimum Data Set project manager came to the door stating she would grab a hand bell for resident #37 to use. RN#3 attempted to put call bell on and it did not work. At this time RN #3 wiggles the call bell box and the light illuminated, then shut off. RN #3 stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in good repair and in a sanitary condition for 3 of 3 Units. (Skilled unit, Dementia unit and Long Term Care unit) for 2 of 2 environmental tours (08/29/23 and 8/31/23) Findings: 1. On 8/29/23 at 1:16 p.m., a surveyor did an environmental tour with the Infection Preventionist in which the following findings were observed: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - Shared bathroom with a resident tooth brush not labeled for who it belonged to and basin stored on floor not covered. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - Basin stored on floor not covered. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - Basin and bedpan stored on floor not covered. On 8/29/23 at approximately 3:00 p.m., a surveyor reviewed the above findings with the Infection Preventionist and confirmed basins should not be stored on the floors, personal items in shared bathrooms should be labeled. 2. On 8/31/23 from 8:15 a.m. to 8:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure weekly pressure ulcer documentation were completed as per facility policy for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #68 [R68]. Finding: The facility's policy and procedure, Pressure Injury and Wound - Elsevier, directed staff to use the organization-approved assessment tool (located in the computer software) to complete assessments. Areas that needed to be documented included: anatomic location on the body, type of pressure injury (PI) or wound, extent of tissue involvement, color, type, and percentage of tissue involved, length, width, and depth measures in centimeters, presence of undermining at the PI or wound edges, tunnels, or sinus tracts (measure and record depth and direction of each), amount, color, and consistency of exudate, presence of foul odor, and periwound skin integrity and to document this in the clinical record. On 8/29/23, R68's clinical record was reviewed and included a physician order for treatment to measure weekly on Thursdays which started on 6/29/23 for a Stage III…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. On 8/28/23 at 12:10 p.m. a surveyor observed R27 wearing oxygen that was being administered by a nasal cannula (NC) at a rate of 3 liters (L). On 8/28/23 R27's clinical record was reviewed and there was no evidence of a physician's order for the use of oxygen. A review of R27's nursing notes dated 6/19/23 to 7/11/23 shows documentation of R27 using oxygen daily at a rate of 3L per minute by nasal cannula. R27's clinical record review shows documentation that on 7/7/23 R27 transitioned from skilled care to long term care, the facility continued to monitor his/her use of oxygen daily until 7/11/23 (4 days after skilled services ended). R27's clinical record lacked evidence that R27's had a physician's order for the use of oxygen. A surveyor observed the oxygen concentrator and the vents located on the back of the machine were covered in dust. On 8/29/23 at 9:25 a.m. a surveyor observed that R27's oxygen concentrator continued to be covered in dust. At 10:00 a.m. a surveyor confirmed with the Skilled Unit Manager that R27's oxygen concentrator was covered in dust. At this time the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that portable oxygen was available for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1 [R1]) to leave their room for activities and to eat in the dining room for breakfast, lunch and supper for 4 of 6 meals served (8/27/23 supper, 8/28/23 breakfast, 8/28/23 lunch, and 8/28/23 supper). Findings: On 8/28/23 at 1:07 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, R1 stated he/she did not receive lunch and that he/she goes to the dining room to eat, but there were no portable oxygen tanks in storage or available, so was told by staff he/she could not go to the dining room and has to eat in his/her room, and could not attend activities. He/she had to eat in room, where there is an oxygen concentrator machine, on 8/27/23 supper, 8/28/23 breakfast, 8/28/23 lunch, and 8/28/23 supper. He/she stated there was a portable oxygen machine that someone donated to the facility, but he/she could not use that because it was not holding a charge. On 8/28/23 at 1:15 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Registered Nurse #2 [RN#2] stated that R1 was not given lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that portable oxygen was available for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1 [R1]) to leave their room to eat in the dining room for breakfast, lunch and dinner for 3 of 5 meals served (8/27/23 dinner, 8/28/23 breakfast, and 8/28/23 lunch). Findings: On 8/28/23 at 1:07 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, R1 stated he/she did not receive lunch and that he/she goes to the dining room to eat, but there were no portable oxygen tanks available or in storage so was told by staff he/she could not go to the dining room and has to eat in his/her room. He/she had to eat in room on 8/27/23 supper, 8/28/23 breakfast, and 8/28/23 lunch, where there is an oxygen concentrator machine. On 8/28/23 at 1:15 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Registered Nurse [RN] stated that R1 was not given lunch today, not sure why, and ate breakfast in his/her room this morning because there were no portable oxygen tanks available for R1's use. A surveyor confirmed at this time that R1 was not able to go to the dining room for meals, per his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative in writing of the transfers/discharges to an acute care hospital for 3 of 3 residents sampled for hospitalization ( Resident #53 [R53], Resident #15 [R15], and Resident #83 [R83]). In addition, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman of facility initiated transfer/discharges. Findings: 1. On 8/28/23 at 12:49 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, R53 stated that he/she was recently admitted to the hospital but did not recall receiving any paperwork from the faciltiy regarding this hospital transfer. On 8/29/23. R53's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the R53 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 7/18/23. The surveyor was unable to find a transfer/discharge notice in the clinical record. On 8/30/23 at 10:26 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator in Training (AIT) stated she was unable to find evidence of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 was coded accurately for 3 of 22 sampled residents (Resident #87 [R87], Resident #101 {R101}, and Resident #86 [R86]). Findings: 1. On 8/28/23 at 1:05 p.m., a surveyor observed R87 wearing oxygen being administered by nasal cannula. On 8/30/23, R87's clinical record was reviewed and included a physician order, dated 4/28/23, to administer oxygen. Review of R87's most recent quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], for Section: O Special Treatments and Programs was not checked on O100C for oxygen use. On 8/30/23 at 11:47 a.m., a surveyor confirmed this finding with the Administrator in Training (AIT). 2. On 8/31/23, R101's clinical record was reviewed and included a physician order, dated 2/11/23, that indicated a Hospice referral was made on 2/8/23. On 8/31/23 at a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Resident Assessment Coordinator (RAC) stated she would check on the date that R101 was accepted into the Hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented within 48 hours that included the instructions needed to provide minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for 1 of 5 sampled residents admitted for skilled care services (Resident #27 [R27]). Finding: Review of R27's clinical record noted that he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnoses of medically complex, morbid obesity, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (chronic). The clinical record lacked evidence that the base line care plan was not developed for the use of oxygen to include the instructions necessary to properly care for R27. On 8/30/23 at approximately 1:31 p.m. during an interview with the Skilled Nurse Manager, the surveyor confirmed that that baseline care plan was not developed to include the use of oxygen and the instructions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were developed to reflect a resident's current needs for 2 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident #87 [R87] and Resident #27 [R27]). Findings: 1. On 8/28/23 at 1:05 p.m., a surveyor observed R87 wearing oxygen being administered by nasal cannula. On 8/30/23, R87's clinical record was reviewed and included a physician order, dated 4/28/23, to administer oxygen. A review of R87's current care plan, last reviewed on 7/5/23, did not include a care area or interventions that identified that R87 used oxygen. On 8/31/23 at 12:14 p.m., a surveyor confirmed this finding with the Administrator in Training (AIT). 2. On 8/28/23 at 12:10 a surveyor observed R27 wearing oxygen that was being administered by a nasal cannula at a rate of 3 liters (L) and a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) machine on his/her bedside table. On 8/28/23 R27's clinical record was reviewed and there was no evidence of a physicians order for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete daily assessments and weekly or as needed dressing changes to a midline catheter for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #53 [R53}). Finding: The facility's policy and procedure, Vascular Access Devices (VADS): Ongoing Assessment, Site Care, and Dressing Change, indicated that a sterile dressing is applied and maintained on all peripheral, nontunneled, peripherally inserted central catheters, and access implanted VADs. Midline catheter site care and dressing changes are performed at established intervals, and immediately when the integrity of the dressing is compromised; if moisture, drainage, or blood is present; or for further assessment if site infection or inflammation is suspected. Gauze dressings are changes every 2 days, transparent semipermeable membrane dressings are changed every 5 to 7 days. R53 returned from the hospital on 7/18/23 with a midline catheter in place so intravenous (IV) medications could still be received. A nurses note, dated 7/18/23 2:34 p.m., indicated patient noted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free from the potential risk of accidents, for 1 of 1 days of survey (8/28/23), when they failed to ensure a toilet was secured to the floor in a resident bathroom. Finding: On 8/8/23 at 12:26 p.m., a surveyor observed Resident #83's bathroom toilet to be loose and not secured to the floor. On 8/8/23 at 12:29 p.m., in an interview, Registered Nurse [RN] #2, he stated that Resident #83 does use the toilet and that there has been trouble with this toilet before. 0n 8/28/23 at 12:33 p.m., in an interview, the Facilities Maintenance Director confirmed that Resident #83's toilet was not properly secured to the floor and was a potential accident hazard. The Regional Facilities Director had the toilet immediately fixed by a maintenance worker. 0n 8/28/23 a 1:17 p.m., a surveyor discussed the finding with the Administrator in training [AIT], the Director of Nursing [DON], and the Interim Administrator.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify a resident's current diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)/trauma to determine what trigger(s) might cause re-traumatization for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed with a current diagnosis of PTSD (Resident #27 [R27]). Finding: 1. On 8/28/23, R27's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of PTSD. R27's admission minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 was dated 6/26/23. This MDS indicated, under Active Diagnosis Section I6100, that the resident had PTSD. The surveyor was unable to find information in the clinical record that indicated what R27's PTSD was caused by or what events might cause re-traumatization. On 8/30/23 at approximately 2:00 p.m , during an interview with the Administer in training a surveyor confirmed the finding that the facility had not obtained information regarding R27's PTSD or what triggers/events might cause traumatization.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, the facility's Purchasing, Receiving, Storage, and Issuance of Food and Supplies Policy/Procedure #: FNS-4, and The facility's Sanitation, Infection Control, HACCP and Safety Policy/Procedure #: IC-FNS- 8, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for wall fans, a hanging pot rack, and hood filters; failed to ensure that staff with facial hair utilized beard restraints; and failed to ensure that food is stored, served and prepared in a safe, sanitary manner as evidenced by improper food storage in the walk-in freezer on 1 of 1 days of kitchen observations (8/28/23). In addition, the facility failed to monitoring for sanitizer solution levels in sanitizing buckets and failed to ensure that the dish machine was maintaining proper temperature ranges for proper cleaning and sanitizing. This has the potential to affect all residents. Findings: On 8/28/23 from 11:30 a.m. to 12:05 p.m., an initial Kitchen Tour was conducted with the Kitchen Manager in which the following findings were observed: 1. >The dish…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and the facility's Sanitation, Infection Control, HACCP, and Safety Policy/Procedure #: IC-FNS- 8, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen high temperature dish machine was maintained in good repair and in safe operating condition for 4 of 4 dish machine observations (8/28/23, 8/29/23, 8/30/23 and 8/31/23) and failed to ensure proper cleaning and sanitizing of dishes for 1 of 4 kitchen tours (8/28/23). Findings: The facility's Sanitation, Infection Control, HACCP, and Safety Policy/Procedure #: IC-FNS- 8, last revised on 12/30/2020 noted the following: Procedure - General Principles - l. Pots are hand washed and then run through the dishwasher where they are rinsed at 180 degrees for proper sanitation. M. Dishes and silver will be washed by machine at wash temperature of 150 degrees[Fahrenheit] and above and the final rinse at least 180 degrees [Fahrenheit] (120[Fahrenheit] chemical rinse, if applicable). Temperatures will be recorded after each meal. x. Food and Nutrition Services Department equipment and facilities are on the plant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-11 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to post in a place accessible to all residents, family members and legal representatives, the results of the most recent surveys for 4 of 4 survey days.Findings: On 12/10/25, between 1:15 p.m. and 1:30 p.m., it was observed that there were no survey results posted on the three facility Units (Skilled Unit, Moonlight Bay Unit (secured dementia unit) and the Long Term Care Unit). The only survey result posted is pinned to a bulletin board in a hard, clear plastic cover, approximately six feet or more from the floor, in the front lobby. The only posted survey available is dated from a survey completed in 12/2021, although the State Agency has completed surveys in 8/2023, 11/2024 and complaints/facility reported incidents. Not all residents leave the Units to go to the front lobby.On 12/10/25 at 2:00 p.m., the surveyor confirmed this finding in an interview with the Administrator.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-12-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information in a predominant place, readily accessible and visible to all residents in 3 of 4 areas of the facility for 4 of 4 survey days. Finding:On 12/10/25, between 1:15 p.m. and 1:30 p.m., it was observed that on the three facility Units (Skilled Unit, Moonlight Bay Unit (secured dementia unit) and the Long Term Care Unit), the nurse staffing information was not posted. The only nurse staffing information posted is pinned to a bulletin board in the front lobby. Not all residents leave the Units to go to the front lobby.On 12/10/25 at 2:00 p.m., the surveyor confirmed this finding in an interview with the Administrator.
- No harm found · B2025-12-11 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the review of annual evaluations and interviews, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for Certified Nursing Assistants - Medication Aide (CNA-M) at least every 12 months, for 3 of 5 personnel files reviewed with employment greater than 1 year. (CNA#4, CNA-M3, CNA-M4)Findings:1. CNA4 was hired on 1/17/21. The employee record lacked evidence of an annual performance evaluation being completed for 2025. 2. CNA-M was hired on 1/2/1983. The employee record lacked evidence of an annual performance evaluation being completed for 2025. 3. CNA-M was hired on 6/17/12. The employee record lacked evidence of an annual performance evaluation being completed for 2025.On 12/11/25 at 10:01 a.m. during an interview with the Administrator, she was unable to provide the 2025 evaluations for the above staff. The evaluations were prepared but there was not evidence to show the evaluations were reviewed with the above-mentioned staff. The surveyor confirmed the above finding at that time.
- No harm found · C2024-11-14 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the quarterly Quality Assurance Committee meeting attendance sheets and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director attended 3 of 3 quarterly meetings. Finding: A review of the Quarterly Assurance Committee meeting attendance sheets indicated that the Medical Director did not attend the 1/17/24, 4/17/24 & 7/24/24 quarterly meeting. On 11/14/24 at 11:09 a.m., during an interview with the Administrator, the surveyor confirmed the finding above.
- No harm found · B2023-08-31 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a bed hold notice for 3 of 3 residents sampled for hospitalization (Resident #53 [R53], Resident #15 [R15], and Resident #83 [R83]). Findings: 1. On 8/28/23 at 12:49 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, R53 stated that he/she was recently admitted to the hospital but did not recall receiving any paperwork from the faciltiy regarding this hospital transfer. On 8/29/23. R53's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the R53 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 7/18/23. The surveyor was unable to find a bed hold notice in the clinical record. On 8/30/23 at 10:26 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator in Training (AIT) stated she was unable to find evidence of a bed hold notice being provided to R53. 2. On 8/30/23, R15's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the R15 was transferred to the hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-08-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to provide equipment (wheelchair) to maintain and/or improve residents' highest level of mobility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for positioning and mobility (Resident #27). Finding: On 8/28/23 at 12:20 p.m., during an interview with Resident #27, he/she stated they are stuck in their room because they do not have a wheelchair that fits him/her. They can't go to activities or even leave the room due to not having a wheelchair that fits him/her. During clinical record review the surveyor reviewed Physical Therapy (PT) treatment notes with dates from 6/20/23 to 7/7/23. The notes indicate that Resident #27 was having his/her personal wheelchair delivered over the weekend, on 6/28/23 a wheelchair trial was attempted, and it is documented that he/she did not fit well and was unable to keep feet on foot pedals he/she was extremely uncomfortable. On 6/30/23 documentation supports resident refusing to use the wheelchair and requested a chair that fits him/her, treatment session was limited due to Resident not able to tolerate use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to post the current daily nurse staffing information that included a separate breakdown of hours for each shift for registered nurses (RN's), licensed practical nurses (LPN's), and certified medical assistants (CNA's) for 3 of 4 survey days (8/28/23, 8/29/23, and 8/30/23). The facility also failed to port the current daily nurse staffing information for 1 of 4 survey days (8/30/23). Findings: On 8/28/23 at 11:15 a.m., a surveyor observed staff posting on the wall by the front hallway across from the reception desk. This posting did not include the hours for each shift for RN's, LPN's, and CNA's working. On 8/29/23 at 1:15 p.m., a surveyor observed staff posting on the wall by the front hallway across from the reception desk. This posting did not include the hours for each shift for RN's, LPN's, and CNA's working. On 8/30/23 at 3:00 p.m., a surveyor observed staff posting on the wall by the front hallway across from the reception desk. This posting was not for the current day, 8/30/23. This posting was dated for 8/29/23, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLARK, RANDALL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/03/2021 |
| GAUNCE, CHRIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/24/2013 |
| MARDEN, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/25/2018 |
| OLSEN, CRYSTAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2011 |
| WARD, BRYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $61K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ME
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205138. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.