No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Waterville Center For Health And Rehab

7 Highwood St, Waterville, ME 04901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 111 certified beds · (207) 873-0705 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2024Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$83,038 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent Sep 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $83,038 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-17)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
13 Railroad Sq · (207) 877-9562 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
140 Elm Plz · (207) 877-0700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Park
55 College Ave · (207) 873-6921 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.7%24.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%5.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.3%2.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.9%11.6%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.9%25.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.1%17.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.4%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.6%29.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.9%20.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.2%74.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.4%20.8%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.9%16.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.981.451.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.262.011.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.5%CMS range 42.4–62.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.8%CMS range 5.6–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting76.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.5–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.85
RN hours/ resident / day
0.58
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.40
RN hoursweekends
50.4%
Total nursing turnover
53.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 94.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.40 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.00 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-28)
28
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — widespread
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, policy review and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to remain free from a physical restraint in accordance with §483.12, resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation with psychosocial harm and the risk of physical harm including the potential to cause death [Resident #99 (R99)]. All residents remained at risk as the facility failed to develop and/or implement measures, to protect the residents from further use of unnecessary restraints. Findings: On 7/31/24 at 12:35 p.m., the State of Maine's Division of Licensing and Certification received an anonymous complaint alleging the facility was short staffed and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were tying residents to chairs. On 9/10/24 at 10:45 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Life Enrichment and Pastoral Care staff member stated, I have never seen or noticed a resident tied to their chairs, but I think I know what you're talking about. That resident passed away. I can't remember what staff or what resident were involved but they were on Cove [Unit]. The surveyor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Social Security Act, resulting in failure to protect the resident from further potential harm from the perpetrator. In addition, the facility failed to report to law enforcement or the State Survey Agency (SA) an incident of possible abuse including the violation of a resident's right to be free from a physical restraint in accordance with §483.12, which kept the resident from ambulating from a wheelchair [Resident #99 (R99)]. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and/or Misappropriation of Resident Funds or Property Prohibition Policy last revised on April 21, 2023 indicated under the Definitions heading: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It also states Timing:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-09-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to fully investigate an incident involving possible abuse including the use of an unnecessary physical restraint on a resident, which kept the resident from ambulating from a wheelchair (Resident #99 (R99). This had the potential to effect all residents in the facility. Findings: On [DATE] at 12:35 p.m., the State of Maine, Division of Licensing and Certification received an anonymous complaint alleging the facility was short staffed and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were tying residents to chairs. On [DATE] at 10:45 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Life Enrichment and Pastoral Care staff member stated, I have never seen or noticed a resident tied to their chairs, but I think I know what you're talking about. That resident passed away. I can't remember what staff or what resident was involved but they were on Cove. The surveyor was directed to ask Registered Nurse #1 (RN1). On [DATE] at 11:15 a.m., in an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-09-17 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews , the facility failed to protect and promote a resident's right be free from a physical restraint in accordance with §483.12 [Resident #99 (R99)]. A reasonable and prudent person would suffer anxiety, distress, and fear from the involuntary loss of independent movement. Findings: On 7/31/24 at 12:35 p.m., the State of Maine, Division of Licensing and Certification received an anonymous complaint alleging the facility was short staffed and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) were tying residents to chairs. The following is a result of the investigation: R99 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility on hospice. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)which indicated severe cognitive impairment and was unable to make his/her needs known. Diagnoses included dementia, lung cancer, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and anxiety disorder with a history of panic attacks. The Care Plan initiated on 7/19/24 indicated the resident has difficulty breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 3 of 4 Units (Harbor, Cove and Memory Care). Findings:1. On 8/25/25 at 12:09 p.m., a surveyor and the Memory Unit Manager observed, in Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-R, a soiled wedge cushion against the wall across from Resident #86's bed and that both Resident #86's wheelchair armrests were ripped. At this time, in an interview with a surveyor, the Memory Unit Manager confirmed the findings. 2. On 8/25/25 at 12:15 p.m., two surveyors observed food particles and debris in two lower cabinets in the kitchenette on Cove Unit. On 8/25/25 at 12:20 p.m., in an interview with two surveyors present, the Cove Unit Manager confirmed the findings. 3. On 8/27/25 at 3:04 p.m., a surveyor and the Harbor Unit Manager observed the following findings:- Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] - There were two wall fans that were heavily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and a review of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment was free of accident hazards relating to the unsecured storage of a container of germicidal disposable wipes for 1 of 4 days of survey. (8/25/25), In addition the facility failed to provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident elopement for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #3 [R3]). Findings: 1. The Safety Data Sheet for Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes stated the following: 5. Emergency and First Aid Procedure: Skin Contact: If rash or irritation develops, discontinue use. Eye Contact: Flush with cool water for 15 minutes. Inhalation: Remove to fresh air. Ingestion: Consult Physician. On 8/25/25 at 12:15 p.m., two surveyors observed a 1 pound 13 ounce container of Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes in a lower, unlocked cabinet in the kitchenette on the Cove Unit. This was accessible to residents. On 8/25/25 at 12:20 p.m., in an interview with two surveyors present, the Cove Unit Manager confirmed the finding. 2. R3 resides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen/kitchenettes were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for fans, air conditioners, a food mixer, air vents, and walls. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that foods were stored, dated and labeled properly for 2 of 6 kitchen/kitchenettes tours (Cove Unit Kitchenette and Kitchen)Findings:The facility's Food Receiving and Storage policy, revised October 2017, noted under Policy Interpretation and Implementation:7. Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packaging, labeled and dated ( used by date).8. All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ( used by date). 1. On 8/25/2025 at 11:30 a.m., a surveyor observed the following findings in the Cove Unit kitchenette: - The far right upper cupboard had a plastic bottle of grape jelly and a jar of strawberry preserves, which had been previously opened and used, with directions to refrigerate after opening.- The kitchenette had no drinking cups and the staff were using paper cups to serve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that garbage and refuse were disposed of in a manner to prevent pest infestation for 3 of 4 survey days. (8/25/25, 8/26/25 and 8/27/25) Findings:1. On 8/25/25 at 1:00 p.m., a surveyor observed loose trash in a wheeled cart without a lid and a dumpster that had the back top lid open exposing trash, outside the kitchen area. 2. On 8/26/25 at 1:30 p.m., a surveyor observed loose trash in a wheeled cart without a lid and a dumpster that had the back top lid open exposing trash, outside the kitchen area.3. On 8/27/25 at 8:05 a.m., a surveyor and the Food Service Director observed loose trash in a wheeled cart without a lid and a dumpster that had the back top lid open exposing trash, outside the kitchen area. At this time, in an interview with a surveyor, the Food Service Director confirmed the findings.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 6 of 33 sampled residents (Resident #5 [R5], R7, R13, R4, R86, and R48). Findings: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record stated in the current care plan: Range of motion[ROM] (active or passive) with am/pm care daily. ON HOLD WHILE GETTING THERAPY Date Initiated: 09/12/2024 Revision on: 05/27/2025. The medical record lacked evidence that Range of motion (active or passive) was documented twice daily for the following dates in 2025: June: 1, 3, and 4. July: 1, 2, 4-10, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 25. The clinical record lacks documentation that the resident completed or refused ROM exercises. August 1, 2, 7-9, 11, 14, 16-19, 21, 22, and 23-26. The clinical record lacks documentation that the resident completed or refused ROM exercises. Bathing documentation shows missing/inaccurate documentation with no resident baths given and no resident refusal for the following dates in 2025: June: 3, 12, 19, and 26. July: 10, 24 and 31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative was provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive for 4 of 33 residents reviewed (Residents R43, R74, R73 and R58). Findings: 1. Resident #43 was admitted in July of 2025. A review of the entire electronic record lacked evidence that the facility offered or provided the resident and/or resident representative with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. 2. Resident #74 was admitted in July of 2025. A review of the entire electronic record lacked evidence that the facility offered or provided the resident and/or resident representative with written information concerning the right to formulate an advanced directive. On 8/26/25 at 1:35 p.m., in an interview with 5 surveyors present, the Social Services Director confirmed that the residents did not have and/or did not decline an Advance Directives. 3. On 8/26/25 the clinical record for R73 was reviewed. The clinical record lacked evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's physician was notified of the discontinuance of a medical device that uses negative pressure to promote wound healing (Wound Vacuum-Assisted Closure [Wound VAC]) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification of change. (Resident #111 [R111]). Finding: On 8/27/25, during a clinical record review for R111, Documentation indicates he/she was admitted with an order for a wound vac. Review of a Health Status Note, dated 7/9/25 at midnight, shows documentation that at 11:30 p.m. on 7/8/25, R111's wound vac canister was full and needed to be changed. The nurse was unable to replace the canister and discontinued the wound vac. She then applied a wet to dry dressing, covered it with an abdominal pad, and secured it with Kerlix. Upon further review of R111's clinical record there is no evidence that his/her physician was made aware of the discontinuation of the wound vac and did not provide an order for the wet to dry dressing that was applied. A Provider's progress note, dated 7/9/25, indicated the wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an effective discharge planning process by failing to send referrals to appropriate entities timely, to involve the interdisciplinary team in discharge planning process, and to update the comprehensive care plan with goals and preferences regarding discharge, with referrals to appropriate entities made for this purpose and /or responses to information received from referrals to appropriate entities, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Discharge (Resident #88 [R88]).Findings: On 8/25/25 at 2:24 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor, R88 stated he/she has wanted to transfer to another facility for the past 3 years but has not had the help he/she needs to achieve this goal. On 8/27/25, R88's clinical record was reviewed and revealed the following:-Review of the R88's Care Plan indicated the focus discharge: [R88 will] remain in the facility through the next review date, revised on 12/01/2022. The intervention for this focus stated, Discuss with [R88] appropriate options through the next review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a specialized mental health diagnosis had been referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation and determination for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR evaluation (Resident #81).Finding:On 8/26/25, clinical record review indicated Resident #81 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 from a hospital, with a specialized mental health diagnosis. The clinical record lacked evidence that that the resident had been screened for a PASRR Level I determination and that it was submitted to the State-designated authority prior to admission. On 8/28/25 at 12:23 p.m., in an interview with five surveyors present, the Social Services Director and the Administrator confirmed that Resident #81's clinical record lacked evidence that that the resident had been screened for a PASRR Level I determination and that it was submitted to the State-designated authority when the resident was admitted in October of 2024.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan in the area of anticoagulant (blood thinner) use for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #48 [R48]). In addition, the facility failed to update a care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Coronavirus 19 (COVID 19) (Resident #45 [R45]).Findings: 1. R48 has diagnoses to include chronic embolism (blockage in a blood vessel) and thrombosis (blood clot formation) of right popliteal vein (a deep vein located behind the knee joint). Review of R48's active physician orders revealed an order for Eliquis Oral Tablet 5MG [milligram] Give 5mg by mouth two times a day for R/O [rule out] Clot. Review of R48's comprehensive care plan lacked evidence that goals and interventions were developed or implemented for the use of an anticoagulant (Eliquis). On 8/27/25 at 3:00 p.m., during an interview, the Memory Unit Manager reviewed R48's care plan and confirmed it did not include the use of an anticoagulant. 2. Review of facility Covid line listing revealed R45 tested positive for COVID 19 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans by an interdisciplinary team (IDT), that included, to the extent possible, participation of the resident and/or his/her representative after each Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 5 of 33 residents reviewed for care planning (Resident #125 [R125], R2, R45, R57, and R1).Findings: 1. Review of R125's clinical record revealed an MDS admission Assessment was completed on 11/8/24. Further review of R125’s clinical record indicated an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting was held 11/25/24 and lacked evidence that an IDT meeting was held within 7 days following the assessment. On 8/28/25 at 12:22 p.m. during an interview, the above finding was discussed with the Social Services Director. 2. Review of R2’s clinical record revealed the quarterly MDS was completed on 5/29/25. Further review of R2’s clinical record indicated, the Interdisciplinary Team meeting (IDT) was held on 6/15/25 (19 days after MDS completion). 3. Review of R45’s clinical record revealed the quarterly MDS was completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, record review, and interview the facility failed to document and adequately assess and monitor a resident after an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #48 [R48]).Finding: Review of the policy, Fall Prevention and Response Policy, revised 7/14/25, states, .Immediate Response.Head-to-toe nursing assessment.vitals.anticoagulant use, anticoagulant last dose.Neurological Monitoring Protocol.Unwitnessed fall OR suspected head impact OR ON anticoagulant.Frequency & duration of neuro check.Q [every] 15 min [minutes] x 1h [hour], Q 30 min x 1 h, Q1 h x 4h, Q4 h x 24 h, Q8 h until 72 h total.Record completion of each neuro check in flowsheet. Resident #48 has diagnoses to include long term use of anticoagulant (blood thinner) and falls. Review of R48's clinical record revealed he/she sustained an unwitnessed fall on 6/3/25. Review of R48's Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 6/3/25 and SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment, Response] nursing progress note, dated 6/3/25, lacked evidence that vital signs were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to respond to the consultant pharmacist's recommendations in a timely manner for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #45 [R45]).Findings:Review of facility policy Medication Regiment Review (MRR) dated 6/5/24 states .Facility should encourage physician/prescriber or other responsible parties receiving the MMR and the director of nursing to act upon the recommendations contained in the MRR for those that require physician/prescriber intervention, facility should encourage physician/prescriber to either accept and act upon the recommendations contained within the MRR or reject all or some of the recommendations contained in the MRR and provide an explanation as to why the recommendation was rejected, as outlined in the State Operations Manual Appendix PP. The attending physician should document in the residents health record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it. Facility should alert the Medical Director where MRRs are not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident [R] 86).Finding:R86 has diagnoses to include depression.R86's care plan states, .uses psychotropic medications r/t [related to] Behavior management: for dx [diagnosis] of Depression.will be/remain free of drug related complications.Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness . Monitor/record/report to MD [Medical Doctor] prn [as needed] side effects.Review of R86's clinical record revealed the following active physician orders:Order for Sertraline HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG [milligram] Give 1 tablet by mouth 1 time a day for Depression.Order for Venlafaxine HCl ER [extended release] Oral Tablet.75MG.Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Depression.Further review of R86's clinical record lacked evidence he/she was monitored for side effects of the above medications.On 8/28/25 at 10:13 a.m., during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed R86's entire clinical record and confirmed R86…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to the storage of a urinary catheter drainage bag for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters (Resident #66 [R66]). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper notification was given to resident representatives during 1 of 1 Covid-19 outbreak in the facility.Findings: 1. R66 has diagnoses to include obstructive uropathy (a blockage in urine flow), indwelling suprapubic urinary catheter, and chronic urinary tract infection. Review of R66's care plan states, .has Suprapubic Catheter for OBSTRUCTIVE AND REFLUX UROPATHY and I get chronic urinary tract infections . On 8/25/25 at 12:38 p.m., R66 was observed foot-propelling in his/her wheelchair from the Memory Unit dining room to the day room area, and his/her urinary catheter drainage bag was hanging under the wheelchair, with the catheter tubing and drainage bag dragging on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during an investigation of a facility-reported incident. (Resident #1) Findings: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include venous stasis ulcers and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Review of Resident #1's Care plan, initiated on 12/19/24, states, .history of Deep Vein Thrombosis r/t [related to] Immobility .at risk of developing another DVT . Inspect legs and feet for Skin color/temperature (calf/thigh): pale, cool, edematous (DVT); pinkish red, warm along the course of the vein (superficial) . Review of Resident #1's active physician orders, dated January 2025, lacked evidence that Resident #1 was being monitored for signs and symptoms related to a DVT. Review of Resident #1's daily skilled assessments dated 1/12/25, 1/16/25, and 1/17/25 lacked evidence that a cardiovascular assessment was completed, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide/obtain Resident and/or Resident's Representatives written information concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and/or formulate an Advance Directive for 8 of 8 Resident's reviewed for Advance Directives (Resident #26 [R26], R46, R251, R252, R43, R4, R64, and R34). Findings: Review of facility policy Advance Directive undated states, .As part of the admission process, [Facility] Social Service Department shall ask and document in the resident's medical record whether the resident has executed an Advance Directive (i.e., Living Will or Durable Healthcare Power of Attorney), if so, the social worker shall obtain a copy and place it in the resident's current medical record. In the absence of an Advance Directive, the social worker shall provide to the Resident and/or the admitting party written information about Maine's Advance Directive laws, the right to refuse or accept medical care, sample forms, and this policy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain the building in a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment on 2 of 4 units (Mountain Top Unit and Harbor Unit) for 3 of 3 facility tours (9/9/24, 9/10/24 and 9/12/24). Findings: 1. On 9/9/24, the following observations were made and confirmations received at time of observation: > On 9/9/24 at 12:52 p.m., in the Cranberry dining room on the Mountain Top Unit, a surveyor observed a pile of wet towels under the ice machine, the flooring had stripped away and the cabinet laminate had peeled back. Mildew was visible on the wall and the floor. At this time, in an interview, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 (CNA2) observed and confirmed the findings. > On 9/9/24 at 12:12 p.m., in the Blueberry dining room on the Mountain Top Unit, a surveyor observed fruit flies over the stove and around the sink. At this time, in an interview, Registered Nurse #2 (RN2) observed and confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to ensure that respiratory equipment was clean to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection related to nebulizer and oxygen tubing for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #251 [R251], R3, and R47). Findings: Review of facility policy Nebulizer Cleaning dated 7/1/21 states ., store the nebulizer in a zip lock plastic bag . 1. Observations of R251 on 9/9/24 at 11:45 a.m., and 9/10/24 at 8:08 a.m., a nebulizer was observed on bedside table with tubing connected to mask lying on top of table not labeled or bagged. Observation of oxygen concentrator on opposite side of room with nasal cannula/tubing connected and observed lying on floor, undated and unbagged. Review of R251's active orders dated September 2024 lacked evidence of an order for oxygen or nebulizer use. During an interview on 9/09/24 at 11:49 a.m. with a surveyor, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 indicated R251 does not use a nebulizer or oxygen. During an observation of R251 on 9/10/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and staffing schedule review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were scheduled and on duty to meet the needs of resident's (Resident #25 [R25], R64, and R18) with the potential to affect all resident's. Findings: On 9/09/24 at 12:52 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 (CNA2) stated, it's hard to provide care timely, lately it's me; a nurse will have 2 floors, and a med tech (Certified Medication Assistant - Medications [CNA-M]). On 9/10/24 at 7:30 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R25 states they had not received a bath 3 times in a row in the past month because staff wouldn't provide it. Record review of R25's Care Plan indicates, [R25] requires extensive assist for toileting and personal hygiene, and physical assist with bathing and patient to have a shower twice a week and prn [as needed]. On 9/10/24 at 10:45 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, RN1 states there is a delay in care due to staffing. Resident's still get what they need but they may be sitting in incontinence for too long before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure that two people who are authorized to administer medications signed the Narcotic Bound Book [a logbook used to record medication] Shift Count page indicating that they counted all the controlled substances at the change of shift for multiple shifts on 2 of 3 units observed for medication storage (Cove and Harbor). Findings: 1. Review of bound controlled medication book labeled Harbor Log #119 lacked evidence that controlled medication counts were conducted by the oncoming nurse on 8/17/24 at 18:20 (6:20 p.m.). Further review of controlled medication book lacked evidence that controlled medication counts were conducted by the outgoing nurse on 8/17/24 at 5:40 a.m., 8/18/24 at 6:00 a.m., and on 8/28/24 at 6:00 a.m. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 6:30 a.m. with a surveyor, Certified Nursing Assistant- Medications #1 (CNA-M1) confirmed above findings. 2. Review of bound controlled medication book labeled Cove #21 lacked evidence that controlled medication counts were conducted by the oncoming nurse on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to adequately date and properly dispose of biological's according to manufacturer specifications and expired medications on 1 of 1 unit (Cove). In addition, the facility failed to adequately store controlled substances in a permanently affixed compartment and double locked in 2 of 2 medication rooms observed (Cove and Harbor). Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure proper vaccine storage temperatures for 1 of 1 unit (Cove) and failed to monitor and record medication refrigerator temperatures for 3 of 4 medication refrigerators observed (Cove and Harbor). Findings: 1. Review of facility policy Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications and Biological's dated 12/1/07 states .Facility should ensure that medications and biological's that (1) have an expired date on the label; (2) have been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines . Medications with a manufactured expiration date expressed with month and year will expire on the last day of the month .Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, Resident Council Meeting Minutes and lunch meal test trays, the facility failed to serve hot foods hot, and cold foods cold for 2 of 4 lunch meals (lunch 9/9/24, and lunch 9/10/24) tested for appetizing temperatures (Resident #4 [R4], R5, R16, R34, R47, and R59). Findings: 1. On 9/09/24 at 11:13 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R59 states, The food is lukewarm most of the time. 2. On 9/09/24 at 11:50 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R47 states, The vegetables are soft and squishy. 3. On 9/9/24 at 11:55 a.m., a surveyor received a test tray from the Harbor Unit with Hot Potato salad, [NAME] Beans and a Hamburger. The temperature of the Hot Potato salad was 95.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The temperature of the [NAME] Beans was 95 degrees F. The temperature of the Hamburger was 99.6 degrees F. The hot foods on the test tray were found not to be palatable at those temperatures by the surveyor. 4. On 9/09/24 at 1:59 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R4 states, The food that comes is always cold and has to be reheated. It is never hot and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, facility logs and the facility's Dish Machine Temperatures policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for a wall mounted fan, food disposals, the dishwasher, the standing floor mixer, ceiling air vents, ceiling tiles, and the walk-in freezer; failed to ensure hair protection was worn by staff; failed to ensure foods were dated/labeled appropriately; failed to ensure kitchen sanitizer was monitored and failed to ensure that kitchen and unit refrigerator/freezer and dishwasher temperatures were monitored appropriately for 1 of 1 kitchen tours (9/9/24) and 2 of 2 kitchen observations (9/9/24 and 9/10/24). This has the potential to affect all residents that eat food prepared by kitchen staff. Findings: Review of the facility's Dish Machine Temperatures policy revised 1/24 noted: Dish machine wash and rinse water should be maintained at temperatures that meet guidelines established by the Food and Drug administration. State or local regulations will apply if stricter. Note: The range for optimal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the cumulative effect of deficiencies cited during the recertification survey from 9/9/24 through 9/17/24, the facility failed to ensure the facility was Administered in a manner that enabled residents to attain or maintain their highest practicable well-being as evidenced by Federal findings listed under §483.10 - Resident Rights (F567, F578, F584); § 483.12 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation (F604, F607, F609, and F610); §483.15 - Admission, Transfer, and Discharge (F623, and F625); §483.20 - Resident Assessments (F645); §483.24 - Quality of Life (F675); §483.25 - Quality of Care (F684, F695); §483.35 - Nursing Services (F725, and F730); §483.45 - Pharmacy Services (F755, and F761); §483.60 - Food and Nutrition Services (F804, F810, and F812); §483.70 - Administration (F842); §483.80 - Infection Control (F880, and F883); §483.90 - Physical Environment (F908); and §483.95 - Training Requirements (F940, F942, F943, F944, F946, F947, and F949). These failures to ensure a process was in place to monitor staff development and resident care resulted in the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent cross contamination and/or development of infection by maintaining a safe and sanitary environment related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP's) pertaining to Residents (Resident #70 [R70], R87, and R84) with a wound(s) for 2 of 5 days of survey (9/9/24, and 9/10/24). Findings: On 9/9/24, from 10:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., a surveyor observed no signage or personal protective equipment (PPE) other than gloves for R70's room who has a wound and is on EBP's. On 9/10/24, from 7:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., a surveyor observed no signage or PPE other than gloves for R70's room who has a wound and is on EBP's. On 9/9/24, from 10:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., a surveyor observed no signage or PPE other than gloves for R87's room, who has a wound and is on EBP's. On 9/10/24, from 7:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., a surveyor observed no signage or PPE other than gloves for R87's room who has a wound and is on EBP's. On 9/9/24, from 10:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m., a surveyor observed no signage or PPE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents were offered pneumococcal vaccinations in accordance with their policy and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident [R] 87, R90, R29, R1, and R70). Findings: Review of the facility Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy Statement, 1. Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine series within thirty (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated., and 7. Administration of the pneumococcal vaccines or revaccinations will be made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations at the time of the vaccination. 1. R87's admission date to the facility was on 1219/23. During review of immunization records, a surveyor could not locate evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, the facility's Dish Machine Temperatures, and a food equipment service company work log, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen high temperature dish machine was maintained in good repair and in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 dish machine observations (9/9/24) and failed to ensure proper cleaning and sanitizing of dishes for 1 of 1 kitchen tours (9/9/24). Findings: Review of the facility's Dish Machine Temperatures policy revised 1/24 noted: Dish machine wash and rinse water should be maintained at temperatures that meet guidelines established by the Food and Drug administration. State or local regulations will apply if stricter. Note: The range for optimal cleaning performance of the Diversey dish detergent is 150° Fahrenheit (F) to 165°F. Supervisor: If documentation of temperatures and test strips/max temperatures results has been assigned to a food and nutrition associate, confirm that it is completed at each meal period. Director: In the event of inappropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident access to personal funds (Resident #47 [R47]). Finding: On 9/9/24 at 11:41 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, R47 stated, I didn't get the $40.00 for the last 2 months. I was fighting about that this morning. Corporate took it all instead of giving it to me. They said they need to find out why. Review of R47's financial statements indicated the facility's cost of care deduction for R47 was $1,251.00 per month, which left $40.00 dollars in an account for personal use. The facility deducted $1,291.00 for cost of care on 8/2/24 and 9/3/24 with out explanation for the increased charge. On 9/12/24 at 7:50 a.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Nursing and Operations Assistant stated she became aware of this when R47's guardian came to do some shopping for R47 but there was not enough money in the account; an email was sent on 9/9/24 regarding this error, and compensation had to wait until a reply was received from the Corporate office. At this time a surveyor confirmed that a resident did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement its own Abuse, Neglect and/or Misappropriation of Resident Funds or Property Prohibition policy to ensure Maine background checks were completed for new employees before they were permitted to work for 2 of 12 sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant #5 [CNA5] and Registered Nurse #1 [RN1]). Findings: The facility's Abuse, Neglect and/or Misappropriation of Resident Funds or Property Prohibition Policy Date: 7/1/2021 and Revised: April 21, 2023, indicates under A. Screening . 1. At a minimum this Community will do the following prior to hiring a new colleague: a. Criminal background checks are conducted per state/federal law/regulation and per [Facility] guidelines. 1. On 9/13/24, a review of CNA5's employee file indicated the date of hire as 6/12/23. CNA5's Maine background check was completed on 7/30/23 (48 days after date of hire and working). 2. On 9/13/24, a review of RN1's employee file indicated the date of hire as 11/6/23. RN1's Maine background check was completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to issue a written transfer/discharge notice to a Resident or their legal representative for a facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 2 of 3 Resident's reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #68 [R68], and R48). Findings: 1. R68 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include dementia, dysphagia and atrial fibrillation. Review of R68's clinical record revealed on 9/5/24 he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital and subsequently admitted to the hospital. Further review of R68's clinical record lacked evidence that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was provided a written transfer/discharge notice. During a review of R68's clinical record on 9/11/24 at 1:40 p.m. with a surveyor, the Administrator confirmed the clinical record lacked evidence that a transfer notice was provided in writing to the Resident and/or Resident Representative. 2. R48 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include Escherichia coli, dysphagia, hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to issue written bed hold notices to include cost of care to the Resident and/or legal representative for 2 of 3 sampled Resident's reviewed for transfer to an acute care hospital (Residents #68 [R68], and R48). Findings: 1. R68 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include dementia, dysphagia and atrial fibrillation. Review of R68's clinical record revealed on 9/5/24 he/she was transferred to an acute care hospital and subsequently admitted to the hospital. Review of R68's clinical record lacked evidence that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was provided a written bed hold notice upon this transfer. During a review of R68's clinical record on 9/11/24 at 1:40 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator confirmed the clinical record lacked evidence that a written bed hold notice was provided in writing to Resident and/or Resident Representative. 2. R48 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include Escherichia coli,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a specialized mental health diagnosis had been referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation and determination for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR evaluation (Resident #90 [R90], R25, and R11). Findings: 1. Clinical record review indicates R90 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses to include bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of R90's PASRR Level I dated 5/31/24 indicates R90 had a Convalescence Categorical exemption (a time-limited 30-day exemption). R90's clinical record lacks evidence that the resident had been re-evaluated for a PASRR Level II determination after the Convalescent period ended. On 9/12/24 at 4:40 p.m., in an interview with the Administrator, a surveyor confirmed R90 had not been re-evaluated for a PASRR Level II determination after the Convalescent period ended.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, and interview the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were updated and/or followed for 1 of 5 Resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #29 [R29]). Findings: On 9/12/24 during R29's clinical record review, R29 had a new physician order filed in the paper record and scanned into the electronic record dated 9/4/24 to, 1) discontinue acetaminophen 650 mg (milligram [m.g]) 3 times daily, 2) Begin acetaminophen 1 g (gram) (1000 m.g equals 1 g) 3 times daily for chronic pain, 3) physical therapy evaluation and treatment for decreased mobility with the patient goal of regaining independence in bed mobility, and 4) occupational therapy evaluation and treatment for decreased mobility with the patient goal of regaining independence in bed mobility. Review of R29's clinical record lacked evidence that R29's acetaminophen order, physical therapy order, and occupational therapy order dated 9/4/24 was reviewed and/or updated by a provider. On 9/12/24 at 9:28 a.m. in an interview with a surveyor, Registered Nurse #4 (RN4), Charge Nurse on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on performance evaluation review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations at least every 12 months for 1 of 5 sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant #2 [CNA2]). Findings: 1. CNA2 was hired on 7/1/21. The facility was unable to provide evidence of completed annual performance evaluations for 2023 and 2024. On 9/13/24 at 1:00 p.m., in an interview with a surveyor, the Administrator confirmed that CNA2 had not received annual performance evaluations in 2023 and 2024.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to provide adaptive built-up utensils and Kennedy cups for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #11 [R11]). Findings: Clinical record review indicates R11 was admitted on [DATE], diagnoses to include generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and protein-calorie malnutrition. R11's Care Plan initiated on 7/9/24 states, [R11] has or may have a nutritional problem, the interventions for this include Adaptive equipment at meals: Kennedy cup, rimmed plate, built-up utensils. The Dietary Communication Slip dated 11/26 states Please issue weighted utensil. On 9/09/24 at 12:58 p.m., a surveyor observed R11 eating lunch in bed. The meal ticket on the tray indicates use of a Kennedy cup, and built-up utensils. R11's meal tray did not include a Kennedy cup or built-up utensils. On 9/10/24 at 8:30 a.m., a surveyor observed R11's breakfast tray did not include a Kennedy cup or built-up utensils. On 9/11/24 at 12:09…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that clinical records were complete and contained accurate information for 3 of 20 residents reviewed for documentation (Resident #46 [R46], R3, and R47). Findings: R46 was admitted on [DATE] and has diagnoses to include diabetes mellitus II, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, vision loss, depression, chronic pain, and end stage renal failure - dialysis dependent. Review of R46's clinical record revealed active orders dated September 2024 and revealed the following: -Order with start date of 12/6/23 for Bupropion HCl ER (XL) Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour (Bupropion HCl). Give 150 mg (milligram) by mouth one time a day for depression 150 mg. -Order with start date of 7/12/24 for Famotidine Oral Tablet 10 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day every [Mon, Wed, Fri, Sun] for GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease). -Order with start date of 2/15/24 for Apixaban Oral Tablet 5 MG (Apixaban). Give 1 tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0942 — isolated
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on employee files review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an education program that included training on Resident Rights for 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) reviewed (CNA4). Findings: CNA4 was hired on 6/27/22. A review of CNA4's education records revealed she has not received yearly education for Resident Rights since 6/27/22. On 9/13/24 at 2:10 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the Human Resource Director confirmed that CNA4 had not received the above In-service training in 2023 and 2024.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) in-service training and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 CNA completed yearly training for Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Property (CNA1). Finding: A review of the Facility Assessment for 2024-2025 revealed Required in-service training for new aides. In-service training must: Be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year. Include dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training. For nurse aides providing services to individuals with cognitive impairments, also address the care of the cognitively impaired. CNA4 was hired on 6/27/22. A review of CNA4's education records revealed she has not received yearly education for Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Property since hired. On 9/13/24 at 2:10 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the Human Resource Director confirmed that CNA4 had not received the above in-service training in 2023 and 2024.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff received mandatory training on its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), which included the staff's role and communication with the program, for 1 of 5 employee files reviewed (Certified Nursing Assistant #4 [CNA4]). Finding: CNA4 was hired on 6/27/22. A review of CNA4's education records lacked evidence she received annual mandatory training regarding the facilities QAPI program. On 9/13/24 at 2:10 p.m. in an interview with a surveyor, the Human Resource Director confirmed the CNA4 had not received the above in-service training in 2023 and 2024.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, review of the facility's Anti-psychotropic Medication Use Policy, and interview, the facility failed to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident # 70). Finding: A review of the facility's policy titled Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), dated 7/1/2021, states The AIMS test is completed on admission, or with initiation of an anti-psychotic medication. The AIMS test is to be completed at least every 180 days (every six months) and/or when requested by the physician. The AIMS test is administered to residents who take anti-psychotics on a regularly scheduled basis or more than ten times per month. A review of Resident #70's clinical record revealed that since the resident's admission on [DATE], he/she has been on the anti-psychotic medication Quetiapine 25 mg (milligrams) twice a day; every day for agitation and anxiety. There was no evidence in Resident #70's clinical record that an AIMS test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$83,038 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $83,038 — penalty dated 2024-09-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BSD ME 26 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 05/06/2021
IKE AKIKOOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 05/06/2021
SINCLAIR, DIANEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/01/2021
BIDERMAN, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2021

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 5%Other / private 34%

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$438per resident / day
operating cost
$13,322per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$346per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maine Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maine
$13,976/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,904/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,205/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 205120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next