Lynwood Manor Healthcare Center
730 Kimole Lane, Adrian, MI 49221 · For profit - Individual · 84 certified beds · (517) 263-6771 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $23,761 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-12)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.6% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.4% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.0% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.9% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.6% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.7% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 29.8% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.42 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.73 | 1.64 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.3%CMS range 36.9–52.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.6–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.9–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 66.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS), A and B: DPS A: This citation pertains to intake MI00144424. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot liquid was served at a safe and appropriate temperature for one (Resident #28) of three reviewed for accident hazards, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy when R28 received coffee of an unknown temperature, which spilled, causing R28 to sustain a second-degree thermal burn (damage to outer and second layer of skin, causing blisters, pain and discoloration) on his left outer thigh and increased pain. Findings include: Resident #28 (R28): Review of the medical record reflected R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/23/24, reflected R28 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2747712Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent accidents for one resident (#1) of three resident reviewed for accidents.Findings Included: Resident #1 (R1)Review of the medical record demonstrated that R1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included pain left knee, diverticulosis (the formation of small bulging pouches in the lining of the colon), disorder of bone density, epilepsy (chronic neurological disorder), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypertension, type 2 diabetes, weakness, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, and fracture of the sacrum. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/12/2026, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15.Review R1's medical record revealed that 01/30/2026 she was discharged from the facility because of an incident that occurred while being transported back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 71 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 06/02/25 at 09:40 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Director (DD) G. The following items were noted: The Scottsman ice machine entrance door (misaligned) and front panel cover plate were observed broken. (DD) G stated: I will contact maintenance for repairs. The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 4-501.11 states: (A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under Parts 4-1 and 4-2. (B) EQUIPMENT components such as doors, seals, hinges, fasteners, and kick plates shall be kept intact, tight, and adjusted in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. (C) Cutting or piercing parts of can openers shall be kept sharp to minimize the creation of metal fragments that can contaminate FOOD when the container is opened. The Scottsman…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for four out of four residents (Resident #14, 18, 35 and 37) cigarettes, lighters, and vaps were stored in a secured manner. Findings Included: Resident #14 (R14): Review of a SMOKING-SAFETY SCREEN dated 2/20/2024, revealed R14 was screened to be safe to smoke independently and without supervision. The screen also revealed R14 did not require the facility to store his light or cigarettes. Review of a care plan that was in place with a Focus of (R14) is a smoker dated 2/20/24 and revised on 4/23/2024, revealed under the interventions, (R14's) smoking supplies are stored with (R14). The care plan did not include how R14 was to safely store the cigarettes and lighter to prevent other residents from obtaining the cigarettes and/or lighter while the products were stored in R14's room. Resident #35 (R35): Review of a SMOKING-SAFETY SCREEN dated 12/9/2024, revealed R35 was screen to be an independent smoker, could light cigarette, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to limit the duration of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication to 14 days and/or ensure the physician documented rationale to extend the duration of use for one (Resident #2) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #2. (R2) Review of the medical record reflected R2 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] and admitted to hospice on 05/16/2025. Diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes, Acute Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stroke and unsteadiness on feet. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/22/2025 revealed R2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (moderately impaired) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R2 is dependent with all care and uses an electric wheelchair as an assistive device. Record revealed R2 had Ativan oral tablet 0.5mg, give 1 tablet by mouth every 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two (Resident #18 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for care plans, had a comprehensive care plan that was revised for resident care needs, resulting in the potential for all care needs not being met. Findings Include: Resident # 18 (R18) Review of the medical record reflected R18 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted after a hospital stay on 03/24/2023. Diagnoses of heart failure, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Aphasia (difficulty communicating due to stroke), muscle weakness, abnormal gait and a history of a stroke. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/20/2025 revealed R18 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R18 requires assistance with personal care and uses a wheelchair as an assistive device. During an interview on 06/03/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper communication/documentation of Hospice services provided to two (Resident #42 and Resident R2) of two resident reviewed for Hospice services, and the facility failed to follow physician orders and properly complete catheter care for one resident (Resident #38) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Resident #42 (R42) Review of the medical record reflected R42 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] and admitted to hospice on 03/26/2025. Diagnoses of Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Bodies, Dementia, Osteoarthritis, Stroke, Depression and Anxiety. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/28/2025 revealed R42 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 02 (severe impairment) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R42 requires assistance with personal care and uses a walker or wheelchair as an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to limit the duration of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication to 14 days and/or ensure the physician documented rationale to extend the duration of use for one (Resident #2) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #2. (R2) Review of the medical record reflected R2 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] and admitted to hospice on 05/16/2025. Diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes, Acute Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stroke and unsteadiness on feet. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/22/2025 revealed R2 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (moderately impaired) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R2 is dependent with all care and uses an electric wheelchair as an assistive device. Record revealed R2 had Ativan oral tablet 0.5mg, give 1 tablet by mouth every 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide palatable food products effecting 66 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for decreased resident food acceptance and nutritional decline. Findings include: On 07/09/24 at 11:45 A.M., Food product temperatures were monitored utilizing a ThermoWorks Super-Fast Thermapen model CR2032 digital thermometer. The following food product temperatures were recorded: Roasted Vegetable Lasagna - 185.5 Capri Blend Vegetables - 147.8 Garlic Toast - 140.0 Cheesecake - Room Temperature Beverage (2% Milk) - 47.8* (*) The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 3-501.16 states: (A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, or when time is used as the public health control as specified under §3-501.19, and except as specified under (B) and in (C ) of this section, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD shall be maintained: (1) At 57oC (135oF) or above, except that roasts cooked to a temperature and for a time specified in 3-401.11(B) or reheated as specified in 3-403.11(E) may be held at a temperature of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: (1) effectively clean and maintain food service equipment, (2) effectively date mark all potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food products, and (3) maintain the food production kitchen flooring surface effecting 66 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and resident foodborne illness. Findings include: On 07/09/24 at 09:51 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Manager D. The following items were noted: The flooring surface was observed missing, directly beneath the Mainstreet Equipment 2-door reach-in cooler. The missing [NAME] tile surface measured approximately 3-feet-wide by 5-feet-long. Dietary Manager D indicated he would have maintenance make necessary repairs as soon as possible. The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 6-501.11 states: PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be maintained in good repair. The Scotsman ice machine sliding entrance door was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 out of 5 Licensed Practical Nurses had the required initial competency evaluations and annual competency evaluation, including demonstration in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents resulting in the potential for staff to lack in the necessary training to adequately meet the needs of 66 residents that currently reside at the facility. Findings Include: Record review of the facility staff personnel records demonstrated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L was currently employed by the facility. The personnel record of LPN L did not demonstrate that she had completed an annual competency evaluation. During an interview on 07/12/2024 at 12:31 p.m. Director of Nursing (DON) B explained that all nursing staff receives a competency evaluation after completion of orientation and annually. She explained that the competency evaluations are completed by observation of skilled performed. DON B confirmed that LPN L personnel file did not demonstrate completion of a new hire competency and did not include an annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 66 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased air quality. Findings include: On 07/09/24 at 02:00 P.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Director of Maintenance V and Director of Housekeeping and Laundry Services U. The following items were noted: Lobby: The drywall surface was observed (etched, scored, particulate), adjacent to the receptionist desk. The damaged wall surface measured approximately 4-feet-wide by 8-feet-long. B-Hall (North) Soiled Utility Room: The return-air-exhaust ventilation was observed non-functional. Main Dining Room: The two sets of exit door surfaces were observed (etched, scored, particulate). Director of Maintenance V indicated he would have staff repaint the door surfaces as soon as possible. Food Production Kitchen: The exterior surfaces of the two entrance doors were observed (etched, scored, particulate). Director of Maintenance V…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely financial statements to one Resident (#26)/responsible person of one Resident reviewed for Resident trust fund, resulting in the resident/responsible person being not informed about personal funds. Findings Included: Resident #26 (R26) Review of the medical record revealed R26 was admitted to the facility 05/25/2017 with diagnoses that included Liver cirrhosis (chronic liver damage resulting in liver failure), type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis right elbow, hepatic failure (liver failure), protein-calorie malnutrition, pain of right shoulder, alcohol dependence, schizoaffective disorder, abnormal gait, muscle weakness, heart disease, heart failure, dementia, gastro-esophageal reflux, depression, hypotension, chronic respiratory failure, history of myocardial infarction (heart attack), hypertension, urinary retention, and chronic viral hepatitis C. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/05/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 1 (severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00144424. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician of a change in tissue appearance for a hot liquid thermal burn for one (Resident #28) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/23/24, reflected R28 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was coded for second or third degree burns. During an interview and observation on 07/09/24 at 2:17 PM, R28 reported about three to four months prior, hot coffee fell over and was super hot. He reported having a fourth-degree burn on his leg. He lifted the left leg of his shorts and showed a darkened area, several inches long, on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) for one Resident (#14) out of three reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Findings Included: Resident #14 (R14) Review of the medical record revealed R14 was admitted to the facility 02/08/2024 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, weakness, difficulty walking, repeated falls, lack of coordination, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertension, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), heart disease, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and shortness of breath. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/17/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Review of R14's medical record demonstrated that his payment source was changed from Medicare to pending Medicaid on 03/07/2024. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide wound care per physician orders, in one of two residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds (Resident #29), resulting in the likelihood of infection, and delayed wound healing. Findings include: Resident #29 (R29) R29 was observed on Tuesday, 7/09/24 at 10:09 AM, sitting in his room in his wheelchair with dressings on each arm that were heavily saturated with brown drainage and both dressings were dated 7/04/24. R29's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with assessment reference date of 6/28/24, introduced a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief cognitive screener) score of 15 (13-15 Cognitively Intact). The same MDS indicated he had the diagnoses of heart failure, high blood pressure, end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, lung disease, skin tears, and moisture associated skin damage. In review of R29's physician orders dated 7/01/24, instructions were to cleanse wounds on his left forearm and right elbow with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Medi honey (aids in promoting moist wound environment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative ambulation services to maintain mobility, in one of one resident reviewed for mobility (Resident #4), resulting in sadness and fear of loss of ability to walk. Findings Include: Resident #4 (R4) R4 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room on 7/09/24 at 12:21 PM and 7/10/24 at 10:25 AM; and during an interview stated she wanted to participate in therapy, but insurance would not cover it. R4 stated she used to be able to walk, staff were supposed to walk with her up and down the hall; but staff did not let her walk outside of her room. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/19/24, revealed she was [AGE] years old, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, short cognitive screener) score of 14 (13-15 Cognitively Intact) and had the diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, history of a stroke with hemiplegia (complete or severe paralysis on one side of the body including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet to one (Resident #28) of three reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/23/24, reflected R28 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was coded for second or third degree burns. On 07/09/24 at 2:13 PM, R28 was observed lying in bed. He reported the food was skimpy, referring to the portion sizes he received. R28 reported his current weight was 140 pounds. On 01/01/2024, R28 weighed 167 pounds. On 07/09/2024, R28 weighed 140.2 pounds, which was a 16.05 percent weight loss. A Physician's Order with a start date of 3/18/24 and a revision date of 4/9/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory treatment in one of two residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident #22), resulting in the likelihood of decreased quality of sleep, increased risk of stroke, heart disease, and diabetes. Findings include: Resident #22 (R22) On 7/09/24 at 10:28 AM R22 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room. A continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, detects collapse of airway and increases pressure) machine was sitting on a shelf near his bed. R22 stated he did not use his CPAP machine, because it was missing a part. R22's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 6/14/24, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a short cognitive screener) score of 11 (08-12 Moderate Impairment). The same MDS revealed R22 had the diagnoses of sleep apnea, high blood pressure, Parkinsonism, anxiety, depression, dementia, and seizure disorder.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication rate was less than 5% when three medication errors were observed form a total of 26 opportunities for two residents (#58,#60) of five reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a mediation error rate of 11.54%. Findings Included: Resident #58 (R58) Review of R58 medical record demonstrated that she was admitted to the facility 05/07/2024 with diagnoses that included constipation, muscle weakness, repeated falls, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), anemia (low red blood cells) anxiety, osteoarthritis, atrial fibrillation, gastro-esophageal reflux, insomnia, osteoporosis (weak bones), vitamin D deficiency, hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), hypertension, and muscle spasms. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/04/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Resident #60 (R60) Review of R60 medical record demonstrated that she was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences for one (Resident #39) of 15 reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R39 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis and diabetes. The admission Minimum Data set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/23/24, reflected R39 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 07/09/24 at 11:40 AM, R39 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in her room. She reported the facility needed to keep track of the food service. She reported her tray ticket reflected what she could and could not have, as well as dislikes or allergies. Per her report, they highlighted that she could not have peppers, and she had recently been served a meal that had red and green peppers all over it. The peppers aggravated her gallbladder, per her report, and she had not had peppers in 15 to 20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessments for safety using a coffee pot independently and self-administering of medications were completed for one (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for medication availability resulting in a fire/burn hazard and medication errors. Findings include: Resident #9 (R9) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R9's initial admission date was 1/8/2022 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), muscle weakness and protein calorie malnutrition. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R9 was cognitively intact (13-15 cognitively intact). During an interview on 2/14/2024 at 2:29 PM, R9 was in his room, walking around. R9 stated, I'm going to make coffee while we talk. R9 proceeded to make coffee and then pulled out an inhaler that was sitting on his bedside table and started using it. After the coffee was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00139686. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor residents weights, in one of three residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident #1), resulting in a significant weight loss. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R1 was admitted on [DATE] and expired on [DATE] on Hospice at the facility. R1 was admitted with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia, gallbladder disease and chronic kidney disease. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 11 out of 15 which indicated R1 cognition was moderately impaired (8-12 moderately impaired) Review of the weight monitoring policy with no implementation date or review date under compliance guidelines #5 revealed, Residents with weight loss - monitor weight weekly. Review of R1's chart revealed the following weights: [DATE] -185.8 pounds [DATE] -192.8 pounds [DATE]-168 pounds [DATE]-167 pounds The weights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertain to intake MI00137450. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility in two of three residents reviewed for dialysis services (Resident #7 and #8), resulting in decreased quality of care. Findings include: Resident #8 (R8) R8 was observed lying in her bed on 2/15/24 at 12:32 PM and had a dressing over her fistula on her left arm. In review of R8's electronic medical record (EMR), she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had discharged from the nursing home to acute care on 2/09/24 and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/08/24 revealed she was admitted to the nursing home on [DATE], had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener, score of 14 (13-15 Cognitively intact). The same MDS indicated R8 had the diagnoses of heart failure, end-stage renal disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 70 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 04/12/23 at 08:35 A.M., A comprehensive tour of the food service was conducted with Registered Dietician C. The following items were noted: The Victory 2-door reach-in cooler was observed with moisture dripping into the cooler cavity, adjacent to the interior light assembly. Pooling water was also observed collecting on the reach-in cooler interior flooring surface. Registered Dietician C indicated she would have maintenance make necessary repairs as soon as possible. The Walk-In Cooler refrigeration unit condensate drain line was observed leaking water from the drain funnel connection. The condensate was also observed pooling on the refrigeration unit flooring surface. Registered Dietician C indicated she would contact maintenance for necessary repairs. The Walk-In Freezer was observed with accumulated formed ice droplets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-17 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure binding arbitration agreements complied with all requirements for three (Resident #34, #45, and #53) of three residents reviewed, resulting in the residents and/or representatives to not be informed of their rights. Findings include: On 4/12/23 at 9:12 AM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported the facility's arbitration agreement was included in the admission agreement and all new admissions signed the agreement. NHA A reported all 70 facility residents had a signed arbitration agreement. On 4/12/23 at 10:59 AM, NHA A provided a list of all residents who entered a binding arbitration agreement since 9/16/19. The list included 658 residents. On 4/12/23 at 12:43 PM, NHA A reported Case Manager (CM) J was responsible for the facility's binding arbitration agreements. Review of the facility's admission Contract revealed 5. Binding Arbitration .The resident understands that .3. this arbitration provision may be rescinded by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 70 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and plumbing leaks. Findings include: On 04/13/23 at 08:55 A.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Director of Maintenance D and Director of Housekeeping and Laundry Services E. The following items were noted: Staff/Visitor Restroom: Eight 12-inch-wide by 12-inch-long vinyl flooring tiles were observed either cracked or severely stained, adjacent to the commode base perimeter. The commode base caulking was also observed cracked, chipped, missing. Director of Maintenance D indicated he would have staff make necessary repairs as soon as possible. A-Wing Soiled Utility Room: The hand sink faucet hot water valve was observed leaking. The valve stem handle was also observed to rotate approximately 270 degrees to stop. North Shower Room: The commode support was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 (R11) resident reviewed, were treated with respect and dignity by staff resulting in feelings of shame, helplessness and a negative psychosocial outcome. Findings Include: Resident #11 (R11) Review of the medical record reflected R11 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Bullous Pemphigoid (autoimmune skin disease, blisters), Idiopathic Orofacial Dystonia (involuntary, forceful contractions of the jaw and tongue, often making it difficult to open or close the mouth), lack of coordination, Schizophrenia, Major Depression and Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia (uncontrolled movements in certain muscles). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/28/2023, revealed R11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 (mildly impaired) out of 15. Under section G0110, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R11 requires extensive assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate completion of advance directive information for 2 (Resident #6 and #48) of 3 residents reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility. Findings include: Resident #6 Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #6 (R6) was admitted to facility 3/16/23 with diagnoses including history of traumatic brain injury, seizures, left hand contracture, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/23/23 revealed that R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Section G of MDS revealed that R6 required supervision after setup for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and eating. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident #6 and #19) of 19 residents reviewed, resulting in an inaccurate MDS assessment and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #6 Review of the medical record reflected that Resident # 6 (R6) was admitted to facility 3/16/23 with diagnoses including history of traumatic brain injury, left hand contracture, and hemiplegia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/23/23 revealed that R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Section G of MDS revealed that R6 required supervision after setup for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and eating, and one-person limited assistance with dressing. Section G also indicated that R6 had no impairments in Range of Motion in either the upper or lower extremities. During an observation and interview on 4/10/23 at 12:17 PM, R6 was observed sitting at the edge of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to update and revise care plans for three (R1, R2, R12) of 18 reviewed for care plans, resulting in the absence of updated interventions to assist with identified health concerns and the potential for all care needs not being met. Resident #1 (R1) Review of the medical record reflected R1 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Anxiety, Depression, age related osteoporosis and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/28/2023, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0110, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) revealed R1 required minimal assistance with personal care provided. R1 could propel in her wheelchair independently throughout the facility. Under section D0200, Mood revealed R1 was marked for finding little to no pleasure in doing things, feeling down, feeling bad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform dressing changes as ordered for one (Resident #51) of 18 reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the potential for a worsening wound and infection. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 (R51) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of the right lower limb and non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left foot. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/8/23 revealed R51 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The Physician's Order dated 3/21/23 revealed left foot second toe: cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, cover with Band-Aid, change every day and as needed. Review of the podiatry consult dated 3/29/23 revealed Patient needs right big toe dressing change 1 time per day. Remove dressing and clean ulcer with sterile saline. Reapply small gauze square and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of smoking materials for 2 (Resident #6 and #25) of 4 residents reviewed for smoking, resulting in the potential for unsafe smoking practices. Findings include: Resident #6 Review of the medical record reflected that Resident # 6 (R6) was admitted to facility 3/16/23 with diagnoses including history of traumatic brain injury, seizures, left hand contracture, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/23/23 revealed that R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Section G of MDS revealed that R6 required supervision after setup for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and eating. Section J of same MDS revealed that R6 currently used tobacco products. During an observation and interview on 4/10/23 at 11:59 AM, R6 was observed sitting at the edge of her bed with her jacket on as stated that she had just returned from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow infection control protocols related to hand hygiene during medication (med) pass for three of 14 residents, resulting in the potential spread of infection among residents, staff and visitors. Findings include: During an interview and observation on 04/12/23 at 7:38 AM, LPN T & LPN U were passing medications to three residents without the use of hand sanitizer or washing their hands with soap and water before and after administering medications to three difference residents. No observation of a alcohol based hand sanitizer on top of the medication cart. Review of the facilities policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, with no date of review. Policy Statement includes This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation breaks down into task. 1) All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced . 2) All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures . 3) Hand hygiene products and supplies shall be readily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$23,761 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $23,761 — penalty dated 2024-07-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRG LYNWOOD HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/02/2011 |
| LEV, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 87% | since 12/01/2022 |
| WEISS, KIMBERLEE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 10/23/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $546K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235182. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.