Huron County Medical Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 70.2 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.96 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen, ensure that food items were dated with an opened date, that expired food was removed and/or disposed of, and that food temperatures were monitored prior to serving. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who consume food prepared and served from the facility kitchen and kitchenettes of a census of 72 residents. On 7/15/25 at 10:00 AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager C of the facility kitchen. The following items were observed:-The juice dispenser had juice in boxes that were connected to be dispensed. The boxes had a delivery date but did not have an open date. The DM was asked about facility policy and reported they should be dated. The DM reported there was a three-month shelf life after opened.-Cups and lids stacked and on a cart that was covered with a cloth, many of the cups and lids were stacked wet.-Plates were stacked and when observed with the DM, a couple of the plates were stacked wet and the tops for the plates were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that provided person-centered care to meet the Resident's needs for one resident (Resident #81) of one resident reviewed for baseline care planning.Findings include: Findings include:Resident #81:A review of Resident #81's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 6/30/25 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 7/15/25 at 2:35 PM, an observation was conducted of Resident #81 lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. The Resident was interviewed, answered questions and engaged in conversation. The Resident was observed with oxygen on wall oxygen per nasal cannula. The Resident reported his oxygen should be at 2 Liters. An observation was made of the oxygen set at just above 2 liters and just under 2.5 liters. The Resident was asked if they had an intravenous (IV) catheter in their arm. The Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility to ensure that a urinary catheter bag and tubing were secured off of the floor for one resident (Resident #6) of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in contamination, an improperly secured catheter bag and tubing with the likelihood of infection. Finding include:Resident #6:On 7/15/2025, at 1:18 PM, Resident #6 was in the dining room in the wheelchair. They had a urinary catheter bag hooked under their wheelchair. The tubing was secured through their left pant leg near their ankle. There was approximately eight inches of catheter tubing resting on the floor. The catheter bag cover appeared to be touching the floor. On 7/16/2025, at 9:30 AM, a record review of Resident #6's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of cancer, Anemia and obstructive uropathy. Resident #6 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. On 7/16/2025, at 4:10 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate physician's orders for oxygen administration for two residents (R38, R81) of two residents sampled for respiratory care, resulting in physician's orders without an oxygen flow rate. Resident #38 R38 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure and interstitial pulmonary disease. On 07/17/2025 at 11:39 AM, observation revealed an oxygen concentrator in the hall outside of the room of R38 it was administering oxygen at 6 liters per minute. On 07/17/2025 at 12:05 PM, record review of the physician's orders revealed an order for oxygen administration dated 07/03/2025 that read, Treatment Respiratory: Apply oxygen (per nasal cannula) to maintain O2 sat > or equal to 90%, AM, PM, NOC. The oxygen order did not specify an oxygen flow rate for R38. On 07/17/2025 at 12:25 PM, an interview was conducted with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00153947. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the care plan and treat a resident with dignity for one resident (Resident #1) out of three residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in frustration, arguing and forceful removal from the activity room. Findings include: Resident #1: On 7/1/25, at 9:05 AM, a record review of the facility provided investigation file regarding the mistreatment of Resident #1 was conducted. The following staff statements revealed: The Assistant Activity Director (AAD) A's statement revealed . At first, it wasn't clear to me that they were seriously arguing, so I began assisting other residents . CNA F continued to argue with the resident, and removed her hands from the table and pushed her in her wheelchair out of the activity room . CNA E's statement revealed Today, after Bingo, around 3pm, (Resident #1) was refusing to leave the activity room . She said she paid for her chips and no one was going to take them away from her. She has a tendency to do this . (CNA F)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting the facility's total census of 85 residents who receive meal services. Findings include: 1. On 7/8/24 at 11:02 AM, the floor in the walk in freezer was observed soiled and with visible debris on its surfaces. On 7/8/24 at 11:04 AM, a plastic container labeled as ground ham, and a bag of gluten free bread were observed on the floor underneath the wire rack shelving. Upon observation the surveyor inquired with Dietary Manager, staff A, on if they thought these areas were being cleaned timely and sufficiently to which they replied, yes, but our stock person comes in on Tuesdays and Fridays. They help with the cleaning and organizing. On 7/8/24 at 11:09 AM, broken eggshells and a container of heavy whipping cream were observed on the flooring in the walk in cooler. At this time the surveyor inquired with staff A on if they thought the flooring was being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1) Resident and employee illness surveillance and monitoring, 2) Perform hand hygiene and don personal protection equipment (PPE) prior to entering a transmission-based precautions room, 3) Supply the staff with a trash receptacle for a transmission-based precautions room, and 4) Ensure that a urinary catheter bag was off the floor for one resident (Resident #20), resulting in the likelihood of contamination and spread of illnesses. Findings include. On 7/09/24, at 2:14 PM, an observation of CNA D who entered room [ROOM NUMBER] without performing hand hygiene, donned gloves but no gown or mask. The door to room [ROOM NUMBER] hand a contact isolation sign attached to an isolation caddy that housed gowns, masks and gloves. There was an additional sign posted on the door that stated contact and droplet isolation. CNA E walked to doorway and asked CNA D, do we need to and CNA D interrupted and stated, no, that's for bed 1 (Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner for a Confidential Group of residents, from a group of 28 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in residents having soiled briefs due to call lights not being answered timely, a lack of a functional outdoor patio, and no opportunity to spend their Bingo winnings due to a closed Bingo store. Findings Include: FACILITY On 7/09/24 at 2:03 PM, during a meeting with a Confidential Group of Residents, several residents on the 2nd and 3rd floors said on the 3rd shift (night shift), their call lights were not being answered timely. They said staff members would come in to answer the call light, but would turn off the call light, sometimes they would ask them what they needed and sometimes they would not, the staff would leave the room and usually not come back in to help them. Three residents said there were occasions when the staff member did not come back to assist them to the bathroom and the residents soiled themselves. The residents said they don't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to effectively act upon repeated concerns from the facility's Resident Council and one resident (Resident #28) of 28 residents reviewed, resulting in resident frustration and anger that their concerns were not being addressed for 1) Call lights not being answered, 2) Food preferences and cold food, 3) The inability to entertain on the outdoor patio and 4) Removal of the Bingo store. Findings Include: FACILITY Resident Council On 7/09/24 at 2:03 PM, during a meeting with 18 members of the Resident Council, they said they were upset because their concerns were not being addressed. They said they bring their issues and concerns to the Resident Council meetings each month, but they do not feel anyone is listening or trying to resolve their issues. A review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, approved for review by the Resident Council President, identified the following: January 30, 2024 with 18 residents in attendance: Residents voiced they would like a staff member to stay with them on the independent side of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for falls for one resident (Resident #24) of 28 residents reviewed for baseline care plans resulting in an incomplete baseline care plan and the resident sustaining falls. Findings include: Resident #24 (R24): Resident #24 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include epilepsy, depression and profound intellectual disabilities. On 07/08/24 at 01:16 PM, record review of the 802 revealed that R24 triggered on the report for falls in the facility. On 07/09/24 at 12:23 PM, record review revealed R24 had sustained falls on 05/22/24 and 07/04/24. On 07/09/24 at 12:27 PM, record review revealed R24 had a baseline care plan for falls that was dated 05/17/24, R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review revealed that R24 was assessed for fall risk on 05/14/24 and was a high risk for falls with a score of 22, anything higher than a score of 16 is high risk. A baseline care plan for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI