Pinnacle Care of Battle Creek
675 Wagner Drive, Battle Creek, MI 49017 · For profit - Partnership · 82 certified beds · (269) 969-6244 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (113) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $133,946 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.1% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.0% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.5% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.6% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.4% | 14.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 25.8% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.19 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.94 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 83% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.78 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.00 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.80 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
113 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 98 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/05/25 at 01:03 P.M., Domestic hot water temperatures were monitored utilizing a ThermoWorks Super-Fast Thermapen model CR2032 digital thermometer. The following domestic hot water temperatures were recorded: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: 128.9 degrees Fahrenheit* Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: 136.7 degrees Fahrenheit* Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: 152.6 degrees Fahrenheit* Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: 145.6 degrees Fahrenheit* Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: 106.9 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: 105.0 degrees Fahrenheit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: 111.7 degrees Fahrenheit On 05/05/25 at 01:45 P.M., An interview was conducted with Environmental Services Director (ESD) E regarding domestic hot water temperature monitoring and documentation log sheets. (ESD) E stated: We routinely monitor hot water temperatures. (ESD) E also stated: The temperatures are recorded on the log sheet. On 05/06/25 at 01:15 P.M., Domestic hot water temperatures were monitored utilizing a ThermoWorks Super-Fast Thermapen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's (Resident #1) right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #2. Findings Included:This citation pertains to intake number 3032111. Resident #1 (R1): Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included repeated falls and muscle weakness, Resident #2 (R2): Review of R2's EMR revealed R2 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychotic disturbance, vascular dementia, severe, with behavioral disturbance. Review of a Social Services Quarterly Evaluation dated 6/4/2026 revealed that on 5/4/2026 R2's Brief Assessment of Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 13 out of 15 which indicated R2 was of normal cognitive functioning. Record review of a facility reported incident (FRI) dated 5/23/2026 revealed that on 5/23/2026 R2 was in the hallway in his wheelchair, when R1 also was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility 1) failed to implement and update Physician orders, 2) accurately assess and document a pressure ulcer, 3) failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention interventions were implemented, 4) failed to adequately assess and treat pain prior to wound care and 5) failed to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident #11, Resident #20) out of 3 reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in worsening of a pressure ulcer, unrelieved pain during wound care, and an increased risk of further skin breakdown. Findings include: Resident #20 (R20) Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, contractures of both right and left legs, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the left heel, dementia, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/10/25, reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00149061 and MI00151480 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for three of nine residents reviewed, resulting in resident-to-resident physical abuse, bruising for R11, bruising and bleeding for R12, and a head laceration requiring sutures and hospital admission for R17. Findings include: Review of the facility reported incident (involving R11 and R12) revealed on [DATE] While these residents were playing bingo, (R11) attacked (R12). R11 wheeled his wheelchair behind R12 and then started hitting him and biting him. R12 did not retaliate and was hit twice and bit twice. The second bite was enough to leave teeth marks . Review of the second facility reported incident (involving R11 and R12) revealed on [DATE], Resident (R12) was using the phone in the front lobby when resident (R11) wheeled behind him and tried to take the phone from him. (R12) started hitting (R11) and (R11) was hitting back .,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate monitoring and treatment for a resident experiencing symptoms of repeat Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), for 1 resident (R18) of 2 residents reviewed for UTI, resulting in a lack of monitoring, a delay in the treatment of a UTI, hospitalization, and sepsis (a life threatening complication of infection.) Findings include: Review of the facility, Antibiotic Stewardships Program Policy, dated 12/1/23, reflected, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use .The Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and Consultant Pharmacist serve as the leaders of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program and receives support from the Administrator and other governing officials of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-18 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure required Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee members attended all QAPI meetings. Findings Included: This citation pertains to intake number 3014134. In an interview on 6/18/2026 at 7:35 AM, Medical Director (MD) E, who was the facility's Physician, stated that he had not been to a QAPI meeting at the facility in so long that he could not recall the last time he was at one. MD E stated that the facility always scheduled the meetings at times he could not attend, and he told them several times the times he was available to attend but they still did not schedule the QAPI meetings around his availability. MD E was very angry while speaking of the concern and stated that all facilities scheduled their QPAPI around the Medical Director's availability, but this facility would not do that, so he was never able to attend.Immediately following the interview with MD E, Administrator A was requested to provide the last year of QAPI sign in logs. Administrator A stated that it was mandatory that MD E be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had qualified Dietary Staff in a current facility census of 62 residents. Findings include:On 3/4/2026 at 1:39 PM, during an interview with Dietary Manager (DM) E, it was reported that she had been in the position for approximately four weeks and her staff consisted of 4 cooks and 6-7 aides. When asked if she was certified DM E reported she had a Food Safety Manager Certification. When asked if the facility currently had a Registered Dietitian (RD), she reported that she did not know. She reported that if she had questions related to the facility menu she would seek answers from their food vendor. DM E reported that nursing staff was responsible for notifying the kitchen when/if residents need high calorie supplements related to weight loss or if they required a specific therapeutic diet. She was not aware of any role that she was responsible for related to weight loss. On 3/6/2026 at 9:25 AM, during an interview with (former) RD N, it was reported that she is no longer employed by the facility and hasn't been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a Quality Assistance and Process Improvement (QAPI) program which identified and prioritized quality deficiencies, systematically analyzed the underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies, and implemented effective corrective action or performance improvement activities to remedy those deficiencies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the safety and quality of life of all 63 residents at the facility.Findings Included:Review of facility policy entitled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), provided during survey, had a blank Date Implemented:, a blank Date Reviewed/Revised: and a blank Reviewed/Revised by: . Review of the QAPI documents provided revealed a copyright of 2025 and heading from another company.During an interview on 04/10/2026 at 09:57 a.m. Nursing Home Administrator A was asked if document provided entitled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) had been approved or implement by the QAPI team. NHA A explained that the policy had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 nurses of 5 reviewed had the required Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certifications in a current facility census of 62 residents.Findings include:On [DATE] at 12:21 PM, during an interview with Human Resources Director D, it was reported that the facility keeps CPR documentation in a separate binder, outside of each employee's human resources folder. A review of the facilities binder (containing staff CPR certifications) revealed that RN M had completed his CPR certification through LearnTastic, LPN G had completed here CPR certification through National CPR foundation, and no CPR certification was found for RN K. Human Resources Director D reported that the facility had recently done an audit of CPR certifications, and she was aware of 2 staff members that needed theirs updated, she was unsure if RN K was one of them or not. No additional documentation for RN K was received prior to survey exit.On [DATE] at 8:44 AM, during a telephone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 5 randomly selected licensed nurses had the knowledge, competencies and skill sets to provide care.Findings include:Five random employee files were reviewed for nurse competencies. A review of these files revealed RN K, RN L, LPN O, LPN P, and RN Q, did not have any education, training or competencies in their employee files. On 3/4/2026 at 4:05 PM, during an interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) D, it was reported that any annual competencies or education would be kept in each employee file. HRD D verified that for the 5 nurses that were reviewed none of them had any formal competencies completed during the new hire process or yearly. HRD D reported that the Director of Nursing and the nursing team were currently working on a process for that. She reported that there wasn't any required online or hands on training in place at the time. On 3/6/2026 at 8:44 AM, during an interview with RN I, it was reported that he has worked in the building for 22 years. RN I reported that in the past the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the required in-service training for nurse aides.Findings include:Five random employee files were reviewed for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) required annual training. A review of the files revealed CNA's R, S, T, U, and A, did not have any annual or new hire education, training or competencies in their employee files. On 3/5/2026 at 1:59 PM, during an interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) D, it was reported that any annual competencies or education would be kept in each employee file. HRD D verified that for the 5 CNA's that were reviewed none of them had any formal competencies or in-services completed during the new hire process or yearly. HRD D reported that the Director of Nursing and the nursing team were currently working on a process for that. She reported that there wasn't any required online or hands on training in place at the time.On 3/6/2026 at 11:38 AM, during an interview with CNA A, it was reported that she had not had any formal competency evaluation or skills check but reported having…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Activities Director had the appropriate qualifications.Findings include:On 3/5/2026 at 10:43 AM, during an interview with Activities Director (AD) J, it was reported that she had been in the AD role since December of 2025. AD J reported that she was not certified but was currently in class. On 3/5/2026 at 3:34 PM, during a follow-up interview with AD J, it was reported that the previous administrator had offered her the job as Activities Director and AD J felt she met the job description qualifications because she was eligible for certification. When asked who performed the following AD duties: scheduling of activities, implementing and/or delegating the implementation of the programs, monitoring the response and/or reviewing/evaluating the response to the programs to determine if the activities meet the assessed needs of the resident and making revisions as necessary, AD J reported that she was currently responsible for those tasks.A review of the facilities Job Description for Activities Director revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2630915Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident physical and verbal abuse for 2 (Resident #103 and Resident #104) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in Resident #103 experiencing physical contact with facial laceration and verbal threats by Resident #104. Resident #103(R103)Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated , 8/18/25 reflected R103 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that traumatic brain injury, intermittent explosive disorder, psychologic disorder, anxiety and depression. The MDS reflected R103 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 13 which indicated his ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact.Resident #104(R104)Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated , 8/18/25 reflected R104 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with vascular dementia, irritability and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2668291Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to allow one Resident (Resident #105) to return to the facility after being hospitalized immediately upon the first available bed and failed to implement required discharge policies and procedures, resulting in increased likelihood of anxiety, stress and uncertainty about placement.Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) submitted 10/16/25, reflected R105 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included progressive neurologic disorder, dementia with agitation, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. The MDS reflected that R105 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 9 which indicated his ability to make daily decisions was moderately impaired. Continued review of the MDS reflected R105 had no history of hallucinations or delusions and 1 of 3 days with verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards other and other behavioral symptoms directed towards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2668291. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative of the facility policy for bed hold and a written reason for the transfer, for one (Resident #105) of three reviewed for hospitalization.Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) submitted 10/16/25, reflected R105 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included progressive neurologic disorder, dementia with agitation, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. The MDS reflected that R105 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 9 which indicated his ability to make daily decisions was moderately impaired. Continued review of the MDS reflected R105 had no history of hallucinations or delusions and 1 of 3 days with verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards other and other behavioral symptoms directed towards self-including hitting, verbal behaviors, and pacing. Review of the Complaint filed with the State of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 98 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 1194799 and 2564904.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R1's) right to be free from sexual abuse by R2.Findings include: R1:Review of the medical record reflected R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's and dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/9/25, reflected R1 scored zero out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and required supervision or touching assistance for walking. On 9/10/25, at 9:12 AM, R1 was observed lying in bed, awake. She acknowledged having friends at the facility but did not know their names. R2 denied concerns pertaining to interactions with other residents.R2:Review of the medical record reflected R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's. The Annual MDS, with an ARD of 6/20/25, reflected R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: (1) effectively clean and maintain food service equipment, and (2) effectively date mark all potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food products effecting 61 residents who consume food, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and resident foodborne illness. Findings include: On 05/05/25 at 09:10 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Head [NAME] (DHC) K. The following items were noted: One gallon (one-sixteenth full) of Kemps Select 2% Milk was observed, within the Arctic Air 2-door reach-in cooler, without an effective open or discard date. The manufacturer's use-by-date read 5-15-25. One gallon (one-eighth full) of Kemps Select Whole Milk was observed, within the walk-in cooler, without an effective open or discard date. The manufacturer's use-by-date was observed to read 5-15-25. The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 3-501.17 states: (A) Except when PACKAGING FOOD using a REDUCED OXYGEN PACKAGING method as specified under § 3-502.12,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program that identified areas of focus and improvement in a current facility census of 61 residents. Findings Included: During the survey a concern was identified at an Immediate Jeopardy level regarding hot water temperatures in which the facility was unaware off. Also, it was identified during the survey a concern of accommodation of resident needs regarding call light accessibility. Review of resident council meeting minutes, dated 3/5/2025, revealed a concern was brought up regarding not having hot water in the resident rooms. The facility's response was to check the hot water temperatures, and to also check them weekly. Review of QAPI minutes revealed no further discussion of weekly hot water temperatures, nor were any documented logs noted. In an interview on 5/08/2025 at 2:35 PM, Administrator A was not able to verify that a QAPI meeting had been held for the month of April 2025. Administrator A stated that she had no idea if there had been QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 61 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, decreased air quality, and potential cross-connections between the potable (drinking) and non-potable (non-drinking) water supplies. Findings include: On 05/06/25 at 09:20 A.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Environmental Services Director (ESD) E. The following items were noted: South Unit Occupational Therapy/Physical Therapy: The wall mounted grab bar, located directly in front of the wheelchair scale, was observed loose-to-mount. 2 of 2 oval shaped mobile swivel chair cushions were also observed (etched, scored, particulate). 1 of 2 chair cushions were additionally observed with green duct tape covering the damaged vinyl surface. (ESD) E indicated she would have staff repair the loose-to-mount grab bar and remove the damaged chairs as soon as possible. Shower Room: 2 of 2 shower wand assemblies were observed missing an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure six out of 15 residents (Resident # 4, 7, 23, 26, 46 & 134) had call lights that were accessible. Findings Included: Resident #4 (R4): During an interview on 5/05/2025 at 10:42 AM, Resident #4 (R4) was observed in bed. The call light was observed to be hanging out of reach of R4. R4 was alert and able to answer questions. R4 stated that he does not have a call light, but there was one hanging on the wall. It was then observed that a call light was wrapped around the call light outlet box that was on the wall. The call light was not within reach of R4, and R4 stated he was not able to reach the call light, and also stated he never used that call light. During the same interview it was observed that a bell was on R4's over the bed table, and upon asking R4 the reason for the bell, R4 stated it was so he could ding it to get someone to come in his room when he needed assistance. R4 said, but said they (staff) never hear it, so he gets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #67 (R67) Review of the medical record revealed R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, quadriplegia, anxiety, and atrial fibrillation. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/6/25 revealed R67 was independent with cognitive skills for daily decision making and had an unplanned discharge to the hospital with a return not anticipated. Review of hospital records from prior to admission revealed a wound assessment dated [DATE] which revealed an abdominal wound to the left lower quadrant. The wound measured 3.5 centimeters (cm) long x 15 cm wide x 1 cm deep. The wound had moderate serous: thin, water, clear drainage. Wound management was listed as Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT/wound vacuum assisted closure [vac]). Another assessment dated [DATE] revealed a second wound on the midline abdomen measuring 12 cm long. The wound was approximated with sutures and moderate amount of serosanguineous: thin watery, pale red/pink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 5/7/25 at 12:24 PM, during a confidential Resident Council meeting, when asked if the residents get the help and care they need without waiting a long time and if staff respond to their call lights timely, responses included: One resident laughed and replied not on nights Usually takes at least a half an hour. Staff turn off call lights and don't take care of the need. It depends on who is working, with certain people I have to wait 45 minutes When asked if there is enough staff, 10 of 10 residents responded no and provided the following responses: We are always short that is why we have to wait so long for call lights. Nights is worse. Good luck getting something done after 6pm (resident mentioned specific concerns with delay in getting brief changed) Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to respond to resident needs timely for three (R2, R25 and R37) and the Resident Council, from a census of 61 residents. Findings include: Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #9 (R9): Review of the medical record reflected R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, insomnia, Alzheimer's and psychotic disorder with delusions. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, reflected R9's cognition and mood were not assessed. R9's medical record did not reflect evidence that monthly Pharmacy Medication Regimen Reviews had been conducted for July 2024, August 2024, September 2024, October 2024 and March 2025. On 05/07/25 at 12:59 PM, an email request was sent to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A and Director of Nursing (DON) B for monthly Pharmacy Medication Regimen Reviews, Pharmacy recommendations and follow-up actions for R9 since 5/1/24. On 05/07/25 at 2:28 PM, DON B reported if the Pharmacy Medication Regimen Reviews were not in the medical record, they did not have them. During a phone interview on 05/08/25 at 11:59 AM, Pharmacist Z reported their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored per professional standards of practice for two residents (R35 and R36) and a medication cart in a current facility census of 61 residents. Findings Included: During an observation of a medication administration on 5/06/2025 at 8:10 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) EE was observed to obtain an iron pill from a bottle to administer to a resident. RN EE was asked why was the observed handwritten date on the bottle there, RN EE stated she did not know other than the nurse were to write the date of the bottle being opened, but stated it meant nothing. A review of the bottle of iron revealed the bottle did not have a manufacture's expiration date on the bottle. RN EE was asked what needed to have been done with the bottle of iron, seems it was not possible to know the expiration date of the iron pills, in which RN EE stated that she would give the iron to the resident because that was what she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consistently offer bedtime snacks to nine of ten residents who attended the confidential Resident Council Meeting. Findings include: On 5/7/25 at 12:24 PM, during the confidential Resident Council meeting, when asked if residents were offered snacks at bedtime, nine of ten reported that snacks were not offered and they would like them. Responses included: No bedtime snacks. They do not offer every night, it is rare when they come in and offer (several residents nodded in agreement or verbalized agreement) They don't always have snacks available. I use to get cottage cheese but they don't have a variety of snacks anymore, mostly only peanut butter sandwiches. The previous kitchen staff use to be really good at asking and offering snacks every night. A review of the resident council meeting minutes revealed the following: January 2, 2025 Please describe the concern: snacks at night February 5, 2025 Please describe the concern: not getting snacks at night On 5/8/25 at 10:48 AM, during an interview with dietary cook JJ, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively maintain the resident call system effecting 61 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for delayed emergency response and/or negative resident outcomes. Findings include: On [DATE] at 02:01 P.M., The resident call system was monitored for functionality for the following resident rooms: South Unit Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: Functioning On [DATE] at 02:55 P.M., An interview was conducted with R25 regarding the resident call system provided by the facility. R25 stated: I wish I had the old call system to push. On [DATE] at 12:06 P.M., An interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R38) was treated with dignity and respect out of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: legal blindness, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety disorder, and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/18/25 revealed R38 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 5/5/25 at 12:34 PM, R38 was observed lying on his back in his bed, speaking with a soft/quiet voice with his eyes closed during most of the interview. R38 reported that his roommate R35 calls him names (dumb son of a b*tch) and is not friendly at all. R38 reported that the facility is aware and that staff have been in the room and witnessed R35 calling him names. On 5/7/25 at 10:32 AM, R35 was asked what he could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and document required informed consent from the resident's guardian prior to administering a psychotropic medication for two (Resident #33, #41) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33) A review of the medical record indicated that Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and early-onset Alzheimer's disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, R33 scored 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severe cognitive impairment. During an interview conducted on 5/05/25 at 11:14 AM, family member (FM) FF reported concerns regarding the recent administration of the anti-anxiety medication Ativan (Lorazepam) to R33. The family member stated that she had questioned why he was receiving the medication and how long it had been prescribed, noting that the family,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of code status information for one (R36) of one reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R36 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, vascular dementia and chronic kidney disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], reflected R36's cognitive status was not assessed. According to the medical record, R36 was their own responsible party. Review of the medical record reflected R36's Physician's Order, dated [DATE], reflected they were a full code (full resuscitation/Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-CPR). Further review of the medical record reflected R36 and two witnesses signed a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR/no CPR) form on [DATE]. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure personal belongings were available for use for one (Resident #38) of one reviewed for personal belongings, resulting in misplaced personal items. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: legal blindness, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, anxiety disorder, and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/18/25 revealed R38 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 5/5/25 at 12:52 PM, R38 reported that a DVD (digital optical disc) set (of episodes of Law and Order) had been purchased by his daughter and was stolen the same day that it was brought into the facility, the facility is aware and his daughter had completed a form to request the facility remedy the situation about 5 months ago. R38 reported being upset…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to limit the duration of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication to 14 days and/or ensure the physician documented rationale to extend the duration of use for one (Resident #33) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33) Review of the medical record reflected R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's with early onset. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, reflected R33 scored 0 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Medical Record revealed an active Physician order initiated on 3/6/25 for Lorazepam (Ativan-an antianxiety medication) Tablet 0.5 milligrams. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Anxiety. On 05/08/25 at 11:27 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reviewed the as needed Ativan order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident/representative with a written notice of transfer/discharge and send a copy to the ombudsman for one (R67) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, quadriplegia, anxiety, and atrial fibrillation. The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/6/25 revealed R67 was independent with cognitive skills for daily decision making and had an unplanned discharge to the hospital with a return not anticipated. Review of the Health Status Note dated 4/6/2025 revealed R67 was transferred to the hospital. R67 did not return to the facility. There was no documentation that a written notice of transfer/discharge was provided. In an interview on 05/08/25 at 12:45 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported a transfer/discharge notice would not have been sent to the ombudsman because they were unaware that was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #20) of 15 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, contractures of both right and left legs, pressure-induced deep tissue damage of the left heel, dementia, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/10/25, reflected that Resident #20 scored 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #20 was not interviewable. On 05/05/25 at 10:07 AM, Resident #20 was observed seated in the dining room wearing pressure-relieving ankle-foot orthosis (PRAFO) boots on both feet. However, the right boot was nearly detached from Resident #20's foot. During an interview conducted on 05/05/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (R11) of 15 reviewed. Findings include: R11: Review of the medical record reflected R11 admitted to the facility 7/3/14 and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, dependence on wheelchair and diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, reflected R11's cognition and mood were not assessed. The same MDS reflected R11 did not walk, was dependent for transfers and required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene and partial/moderate assistance with rolling left and right. On 05/06/25 at 9:21 AM, R11 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in the hallway, without a seating cushion in the wheelchair. On 05/07/25 at 8:12 AM, R11 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in the hallway, without a seating cushion in the wheelchair. On 05/07/25 at 2:52 PM, R11 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #9 (R9): Review of the medical record reflected R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, insomnia, Alzheimer's and psychotic disorder with delusions. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, reflected R9's cognition and mood were not assessed. On 05/06/25 at 1:12 PM, R9 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in their room, watching TV. Section C (Cognitive Patterns) of the Quarterly MDS, with an ARD of 3/31/25, reflected questions C0100 through C1000 were marked with responses of dashes and Not assessed. Section D (Mood) of the same MDS was marked with responses that included Not assessed and Not assessed/no information. In an interview on 05/07/25 at 11:21 AM, Social Worker (SW) C reported R9 could be cranky and unwilling to do things, and their behaviors included refusal of care and lashing out at others. In an interview on 05/08/25 at 10:49 AM, Certified Nurse Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive Care Plan for one (R11) of 15 reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R11 admitted to the facility 7/3/14 and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, dependence on wheelchair and diabetes. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, reflected R11's cognition and mood were not assessed. The same MDS reflected R11 did not walk, was dependent for transfers and required substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene and partial/moderate assistance with rolling left and right. On 05/06/25 at 9:21 AM, R11 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in the hallway. Gripper socks were observed on both feet. Rear anti-tip bars and anti-rollback brakes were observed on the wheelchair. A seating cushion was not observed in the wheelchair. Upon entering R11's room, a standard mattress was noted on their bed, without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly care conference for one (resident 33) of three residents reviewed for careplanning. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's with early onset. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, reflected R33 scored 0 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). During an interview conducted on 5/5/25, at 11:14 AM, Family Member FF reported recent inconsistencies regarding the care conferences, which are typically scheduled on a quarterly basis. A review of R33's care conference records showed that the last quarterly care conference was held on 12/9/24. The subsequent conference was due in March 2025, however, documentation confirmed that it was not conducted. In an interview on 5/8/25 at 10:56…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide consistent and meaningful activities, ensure adequate staffing and staff engagement, and maintain accountability for the implementation of scheduled activities for one (Resident #33) out of one reviewed for activities. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33) Review of the medical record reflected R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and Alzheimer's with early onset. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25, reflected R33 scored 0 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). During an interview on 5/05/25 at 11:14 AM, Family Member (FM) FF reported that resident R33 was previously a very active person. The FM expressed concern regarding the current level of activity and engagement available to R33, stating that they were concerned about the activities. FM FF stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly adhere to the physician's order for double protein portions for one resident (Resident #20) out of one reviewed for nutrition. Resident #20 A review of the medical record indicates that Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include heart failure and both acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. On 05/05/25 at 11:54 AM, Resident #20 was observed seated in the dining room, where their lunch consisted of two chicken tenders, potatoes, and coleslaw. Upon further observation, it was noted that the portion size of Resident #20's meal was consistent with that of the other residents in the dining room. The medical record shows that Resident #20's weight was recorded on the following dates: 2/28/25, 3/1/25, 3/14/25, 4/18/25, and 5/2/25. The recorded weights were as follows: 222.0 pounds on 3/14/25, 211.5 pounds on 4/18/25, and 210.2 pounds on 5/2/25. A Physician's Order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for three observed medication errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 12%. Findings Included: During an observation of a medication administration on 5/06/2025 at 8:10 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) EE was observed to obtain an iron pill from a bottle to administer to a resident. RN EE was asked why was the observed handwritten date on the bottle there, RN EE stated she did not know other than the nurse were to write the date of the bottle being opened, but stated it meant nothing. A review of the bottle of iron revealed the bottle did not have a manufacture's expiration date on the bottle. RN EE was asked what needed to have been done with the bottle of iron, seems it was not possible to know the expiration date of the iron pills, in which RN EE stated that she would give the iron to the resident because that was what she was supposed to do, but said she did not know the expiration date of the iron pills. RN EE was observed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed every seven days for one out of two residents (Resident #61). Findings Included: In an observation on 5/05/2025 at 12:25 PM, an oxygen concentrator (tank that delivers oxygen) was observed to be on. Tubing was observed to go from the tank to Resident #61's (R61) nose and was administering oxygen to the R61. The tubing was observed to have a tapped label on it which had a date of 4/20/2025. In another observation on 5/07/2025 at 3:07 PM, R61 was observed to have the same oxygen tubing in place as observed on 5/5/2024 and was still labeled 4/20/2025. In an interview on 5/07/2025 at 3:45 PM, Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), who was also a Registered Nurse (RN) J stated that she did not monitor and track the use of oxygen tubing via the infection control program. ICP/RN J stated she did not perform audits to ensure oxygen tubing was being changed every seven days. In an interview on 5/07/2025 at 3:59 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) B stated the oxygen tubing was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document education provided regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal immunization for two (R2 and R22) of five reviewed. Findings include: Resident #22 (R22) Review of the medical record revealed R22 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/23/25 revealed R22's cognitive skills for daily decision making were not assessed. The MDS with an ARD of 12/21/24 revealed R22 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Pneumonia Vaccine Consent Form revealed R22 declined the pneumonia vaccine on 5/9/24. Review of the Nurses Note dated 8/28/24 revealed PCP [primary care physician] ordered pneumonia immunization, resident consented . R22 received the pneumonia vaccine on 8/30/24. The medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00150826. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) assistance for two residents (Resident 14 and Resident 21) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Resident #14 (R14) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #14 (R14) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, need for assistance with personal care, reduced mobility, and muscle weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment date (ARD) of 12/15/25 revealed R14 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and required substantial/maximal assistance with showering. On 4/9/25 at 12:38 PM, R14 was observed sitting in his power scooter, with stubble on his face and food/debris on his shirt and coat. R14 reported that he had been trying to get staff to shave him for at least 3 days and that he gets a shower about once per week, which he reported is an improvement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00151617 and MI00150826 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain orders for catheter care and failed to properly maintain urinary catheters for two (Resident 10 and Resident 14) of three reviewed. Findings include: Resident #10 (R10) Review of the medical record revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, depression, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and paraplegia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment date (ARD) of 12/29/24 revealed R10 scored 15 out of 15 (intact cognition) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and had an indwelling catheter. On 4/9/25 at 1:13 PM, R10 was observed lying in bed on her left side, with a urinary drainage bag observed hanging from the edge of her bed. R10 reported having problems with her suprapubic catheter frequently and that she needs to remind staff to flush it daily. R10 further reported being frustrated that she recently has had to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation refers to intake MI00148755. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective Pest Control Program effecting 64 residents, resulting in complaints regarding rodents, the presence of rodent activity in multiple areas of the facility, and the potential to cause cross-contamination and resident discomfort. Findings include: On 12/18/24 at 10:30 AM, an observation of R2's Room (104) was conducted. Several rodent droppings were observed in the hallway right outside resident's door. Rodent droppings were observed along the floor/wall junctures, behind the door and garbage cans. Additional activity was observed in both resident closets. Approximately 20 droppings were found in/around R2's room. On 12/18/24 at approximately 10:40 AM, upon exiting right from R2's room, an outside exit door was observed not to be tightly sealed. Rodent droppings were observed along the floor/wall junctures of the hallway leading to the exit door. Droppings were noted in front of the exit door and windows in this area. Further observation of the exit door (outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00147038. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident physical abuse to the State Agency for two (Resident #4 and #5) of five reviewed. Findings include: Resident #4 (R4): Review of the medical record reflected R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/30/24, reflected R4 scored 11 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 9/25/24 at 9:52 AM, R4 was seated in a wheelchair, in his room. R4 denied any verbal or physical incidents with other facility residents. A Progress Note for 9/12/24 at 7:25 PM reflected R4 was in his wheelchair and attempted to roll around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure management and monitoring of diabetes for one (Resident #1) of four reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #1 (R1) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes without complications (11/17/23) and type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (9/11/24). On 9/25/24 at 10:31 AM, R1 was lying in bed. R1 reported his Trulicity (dulaglutide/medication used to treat type 2 diabetes and help control blood sugar) was discontinued a couple months prior due to insurance no longer covering the cost of the medication. R1 reported the facility had not found an alternative medication that insurance would cover the cost for. R1 reported a recent hospitalization and being placed on short-acting and long-acting insulin. Review of R1's Physician's Orders reflected he had been prescribed Trulicity, to be administered weekly for type 2 diabetes, with a start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: (1) date mark all potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food products, (2) maintain the mechanical dish machine, and (3) maintain ventilation hood lighting effecting 53 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, resident foodborne illness, and decreased illumination. Findings include: On 03/12/24 at 09:23 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Manager L. The following items were noted: One gallon of Mooville Whole Milk 1/4 full was observed within the Arctic Air 2-Door Refrigeration Unit without an effective date mark on the container. The manufacturer's use-by-date was observed to read 3-18-24. One quart of Glenview Farms Heavy Cream was also observed without an effective date mark on the container. The manufacturer's use-by-date was observed to read 4-14-24. One 5lb container of Glenview Farms Cottage Cheese was additionally observed with a manufacturer's use-by-date of 3-4-24. The date mark label was also observed to read:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for all 46 residents, who resided in the facility, effective administration oversite of the facility's plan of correction for the survey dated 3/19/2024, and bringing the facility into compliance for 10 identified deficient practices. Findings Included: Review of the facility's plan of correction (POC) for survey dated 3/19/2024 revealed that the POC was not completed by 4/22/2024, the facility's alleged POC date, nor by 5/9/2024 upon exit of the revisit survey for the following tags, F561, 565, 582, 625, 656, 657, 684, 740, 761, and 812. Further review of the facility's POC revealed: F561, the facility did not perform audits to monitor and ensure continued compliance for resident self-determination, and did not provide education for all staff. The facility's POC revealed that all residents were determined to have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice, however the facility did not assess all residents who resided at the facility for self-determination. F565, the facility identified per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, through the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, monitoring of corrective action for 10 deficiencies that were identified on the previous survey, dated 3/19/2024, were in compliance by 4/22/2024 the facility's alleged compliance date. Findings Included: Review of the facility's plan of correction (POC) for survey dated 3/19/2024 revealed that the POC was not completed by 4/22/2024, the facility's alleged POC date, nor by 5/9/2024 upon exit of the revisit survey for the following tags, F561, 565, 582, 625, 656, 657, 684, 740, 761, and 812. Further review of the facility's POC revealed: F561, the facility did not perform audits to monitor and ensure continued compliance for resident self-determination, and did not provide education for all staff. The facility's POC revealed that all residents were determined to have the potential to be affected by the deficient practice, however the facility did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for one of eight residents reviewed for medications (Resident #18), affecting a census of 53 residents, resulting in inappropriate antibiotic use and increased risk of adverse events associated with antibiotic use. Findings include: Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) U was interviewed on 3/14/24 at 11:11 AM and stated the facility did not use McGeer's or Loeb criteria to determine if the resident likely had an infection, in which an antibiotic was indicated. Director of Nursing (DON) B was interviewed on 3/19/24 at 8:07 AM and stated the facility followed McGeer's criteria. DON B was not able to produce education provided to facility nurses regarding McGeer's or Loebs criteria. Antibiotic Stewardship Program Policy dated 12/01/23 revealed the program included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective Pest Control Program effecting 53 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, insect/rodent infestations, and resident discomfort. Findings include: On 03/12/24 at 10:30 A.M., An interview was conducted with Resident #2 regarding pest control concerns within his room. Resident #2 stated: I saw mice in my room last Thursday night (3-7-24). Three pest control glue boards and one plastic bait station containing bait were also observed strategically placed within Resident #2's room. On 03/13/24 at 11:28 A.M., Record review of the (Contractual Pest Control Company Name) pest control service invoices for the last 180 days revealed the last physical facility service date by a licensed pest control technician occurred on 8-24-23. On 03/13/24 at 11:33 A.M., An interview was conducted with Director of Maintenance N regarding no specific facility pest control service activity since 8-24-23. Director of Maintenance N stated: I believe lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address and resolve grievances reported in Resident Council Meetings as stated during a confidential Resident Council meeting resulting in unresolved concerns and unmet needs of residents. Findings include: During a confidential Resident Council meeting on 3/13/2024 at 10:48 AM which started late due to staff not assisting residents on time, five of seven residents reported that the facility didn't respond to grievances and/or suggestions brought to them from Resident Council and they weren't getting resolved. Four of seven residents said that staffing and call lights have been brought up monthly for several months in Resident Council meetings and there was no distinct resolution and they weren't happy with the resolution presented by the facility. Six of seven residents stated that the rationale presented by the facility was that they are working on it and they think the resolution is okay for them but it isn't okay with us. Six of seven residents reported that the facility doesn't listen to suggestions brought to them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents (#7 and #38) of 15 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy, resulting in inaccurate MDS assessments, and the potential for inaccurate care plans and unmet care needs. Findings Included: Resident #7 (R7): Review of the medical record reflected Resident #7 (R7) admitted to the facility 2/1/24, with diagnoses that included diabetes, angina pectoris (chest pain caused by reduced blood flow to the heart) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/24, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R7 no longer resided in the facility at the time of the survey. A Progress Note for 2/27/24 at 11:37 PM reflected that upon taking her bedtime medication, R7 was noticeably altered. She was confused and oriented to herself only. R7 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: (1) effectively secure an active physical plant renovation site, (2) maintain flooring and wall surfaces, (3) maintain roofing and plumbing systems, and (4) secure electrical heating devices (crock pot) for 1 (#47) of 14 sampled residents effecting 53 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for accidental resident falls and/or serious bodily injury. Findings include: On 03/12/24 at 02:13 P.M., An interview was conducted with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A regarding the current physical plant renovation site security awareness. (NHA) A stated: We have caution tape across the double doors. On 03/13/24 at 09:55 A.M., An environmental tour of the facility basement was conducted by this surveyor. The following item was noted: Electrical/Generator Panel Room: Pooling water was observed, adjacent to the Main Electrical and Generator Panel Disconnects. On 03/13/24 at 10:20 A.M., An interview was conducted with Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident needs as reported in a confidential Resident Council meeting resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: During a confidential Resident Council meeting on 3/13/2024 at 10:48 AM which started late due to staff not assisting residents on time, six of seven residents reported that they had to wait a long time for help from staff and that waiting for one hour was not unusual. One resident stated that the aides leave and say they will be back and sometimes don't come back. Six of seven residents said weekend staffing was worse. One resident said that he waited for help for over 2 ½ hours on a weekend. Another resident said they don't have enough staff to properly take care of them. Four of seven residents said that staffing and call lights have been brought up monthly for several months in Resident Council meetings and there was no distinct resolution and they aren't happy with the resolution presented by the facility. Six of seven residents stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the medical record that identified medication review irregularities were reviewed, the action taken, and the rationale for no changes to the medications for four (R2, R25, R38 and R44 ) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications Finding include: Resident #25(R25) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) date 1/3/24, reflected R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] related to dementia, heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (DM), stroke, depression, psychotic disorder(other than schizophrenia), and anxiety . The MDS reflected R25 had a BIMS (assessment tool) score which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired. The MDS reflected R25 did not have behaviors. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 3/13/24 at 2:38 PM, reflected R25 had monthly Pharmacy Reviews that indicated recommendations for May, June, July, November of 2023 and February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation has 2 Deficient Practice Statements (DPS), #1 and #2. DPS #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eye drops were removed from use according to manufactures instructions, in one of two medication carts reviewed, resulting in risk of decreased efficacy. Findings include: On 3/14/24 at 12:15 PM a bottle of Latanoprost (Xalatan, used to treat increased eye pressure/glaucoma) was observed in a medication cart located on south hall with an opened date of 1/02/24. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G stated she thought Latanoprost was good for 60 days after opening. According to the Xalatan website at Xalatan.com, once the bottle was opened, it may be stored at room temperature for 6 weeks. The Director of Nursing (DON) B was interviewed on 3/19/24 at 8:10 AM and stated the facility's policy indicated to follow manufactures instructions for storage of eye drops. Deficient Practice Statement #2 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure enteral food products were provided with current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively maintain the facility resident call system effecting 29 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for delayed emergency response and/or negative resident outcomes. Findings include: On [DATE] at 03:20 P.M., An interview was conducted with Director of Maintenance N regarding an unmarked illuminated light upon the South Unit Nursing Station call system panel board. Director of Maintenance N stated: The light is coming from room [ROOM NUMBER]. On [DATE] at 03:25 P.M., An interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) P regarding the facility resident call system. (CNA) P stated: You have to cancel Bed 1 and then Bed 2 to stop the noise in 148. (CNA) P also stated: Sometimes people forget to cancel Bed 2. On [DATE] at 08:57 A.M., Director of Maintenance N stated: The call system went down yesterday (3-13-24) at (05:15 PM) on South Unit. Director of Maintenance N also stated: We have provided bells to each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the physical plant, including floor wall junctures and lighting, resulting in unsanitary and unsafe conditions for any residents residing in or traversing through the North Hall and open areas of the South Hall. Findings include: On 5/7/24 at approximately 12:50 PM, the over sink light in the toilet room of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed very dim and flickering. Interview at this time with Staff I was conducted. Staff I stated that the lighting comes and goes. On 5/7/24 at approximately 1:00 PM, a hole approximately 6 inches by 12 inches was observed in the wall behind the toilet in the visitor toilet room. On 5/7/24 at approximately 3:00 PM, on the North Hall between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], and under the radiator near room [ROOM NUMBER], observed gaps at the floor/wall juncture of approximately an inch, between the floor and the cove base. Dirt and debris accumulation could be seen in the gaps. The cove base was observed missing at the exit door…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for one resident (R11) of two residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the likelihood of feelings of embarrassment and humiliation based on the reasonable person concept. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R11 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] related to Alzheimers disease, bipolar disorder, traumatic brain injury, hypertension (high blood pressure), depression and anxiety. The MDS reflected R11 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired. Review of the MDS, revealed she was dependant on care and required substantial/maximal assist (helper does more than half the effort) with toileting, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS reflected R11 did not have behaviors including refusal of care. The Face Sheet reflected a picture of R11 with long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident choices were honored for two of two residents (Residents #4 and #206) reviewed for choices and as reported by four of seven residents during a confidential Resident Council meeting resulting in frustration and distress. Findings include: During a confidential Resident Council meeting on 3/13/2024 at 10:48 AM which started late due to staff not assisting residents on time, four of seven residents reported that they were unaware of their rights at the facility and that their rights are not encouraged. One resident reported that he doesn't even know what his rights are. One resident said that the facility staff doesn't follow rules since the residents buy food items to be kept in the resident refrigerator at the nurses' station and staff won't get things for them when they ask for it. Another resident stated that Sometimes we don't get our items until a week later such as pop or unopened sandwich meat. Seven of seven residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) to one (Resident #56) of three reviewed for Beneficiary Notification; and 2) ensure the SNF ABN included the estimated cost of items and services for which the resident may be charged for two (Resident #14 and #47) of three reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Findings include: Resident #56 (R56): Review of the medical record reflected R56 admitted to the facility on [DATE], on Medicare Part A services. R56's last covered day under Medicare Part A services was 10/1/23. R56 remained in the facility, until discharged on 11/21/23, and was not provided with an SNF ABN upon discharge from Medicare Part A services. During an interview on 03/15/24 at 08:52 AM, Business Office Manager (BOM) K reported R56 should have received an SNF ABN. Resident #14 (R14): Review of the medical record reflected R14 readmitted to the facility on [DATE], on Medicare Part A services. R14's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medical information to the hospital for one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #7 (R7) admitted to the facility 2/1/24, with diagnoses that included diabetes, angina pectoris (chest pain caused by reduced blood flow to the heart) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/24, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R7 no longer resided in the facility at the time of the survey. A late entry Progress Note for 2/26/24 at 9:30 PM reflected R7 was observed on a personal phone, contacting Emergency Medical Services (EMS), stating she was having diabetic complications and requesting assistance. Upon EMS arrival, there was no medical emergency, according to the note. The note reflected R7 was her own responsible party and was transferred for further evaluation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative, in writing, of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital for one (Resident #7) of one reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #7 (R7) admitted to the facility 2/1/24, with diagnoses that included diabetes, angina pectoris (chest pain caused by reduced blood flow to the heart) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/24, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R7 no longer resided in the facility at the time of the survey. A Progress Note for 2/27/24 at 11:37 PM reflected that upon taking her bedtime medication, R7 was noticeably altered. She was confused and oriented to herself only. R7 was unable to communicate where she was. She was unable to complete full sentences and was confused to the time and day. R7's oxygen saturation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative of the facility's policy for bed hold for one (Resident #7) of one reviewed for hospital transfer. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #7 (R7) admitted to the facility 2/1/24, with diagnoses that included diabetes, angina pectoris (chest pain caused by reduced blood flow to the heart) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/14/24, reflected R7 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R7 no longer resided in the facility at the time of the survey. A Progress Note for 2/27/24 at 11:37 PM reflected that upon taking her bedtime medication, R7 was noticeably altered. She was confused and oriented to herself only. R7 was unable to communicate where she was. She was unable to complete full sentences and was confused to the time and day. R7's oxygen saturation was 82 percent while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) for one resident (#29) of 14 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS), resulting in the potential for inaccurate care plans and unmet needs. Findings Included: Resident #29 (R29) Review of the medical record demonstrated R29 was admitted to the facility 10/08/2018 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis) affecting left dominate side, type 2 diabetes, malnutrition, apraxia (difficulty with skill movement), weakness, chronic right hip pain, edema, depression, constipation, hearing loss, hypertension, and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/12/2024, revealed R29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed because the resident is rarely never understood. Review of R29's medical record demonstrated a physician order written 12/09/2023 for hospice services. Review of R29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for two of 14 residents (Residents #4, and #29) reviewed for Care Plan implementation for behavioral health and hospice services. Findings Include: Resident #4 (R4) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 (R4) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart disease with heart failure, supra-pubic catheter, neurogenic bladder (overactive). According to Resident #4 (R4)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R4 scored 10 out of 15 (Moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R4 required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, getting dressed and personal hygiene. During a record review, it revealed R4 did not have a Dementia diagnosis or any other diagnosis for cognitive impairment. R4 was not on any medications for cognitive impairment. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were evaluated for effectiveness and updated in a timely manner, with new interventions, to prevent further decline in condition for one (Resident #4) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. Findings Include: Resident #4 (R4) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 (R4) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart disease with heart failure, supra-pubic catheter, neurogenic bladder (overactive). According to Resident #4 (R4)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R4 scored 10 out of 15 (Moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R4 required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, getting dressed and personal hygiene. Record review did reveal visit notes from [name redacted] psychiatric services for dates of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to actively pursue discharge planning for one resident (#206) of one resident reviewed for discharge planning resulting in frustration with the facility discharge process. Findings Included: Resident #206 (R206) Review of the medical record demonstrated R206 was admitted to the facility 02/20/2024 with diagnoses that included central cord syndrome at the cervical spinal cord (causing impairment of upper limb motor function), abnormalities in gait and mobility, muscle spasm of back, rheumatoid arthritis, low back pain, overactive bladder, quadriplegia, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), anxiety, constipation, insomnia, heart disease, hypertension, pain in upper left arm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/2024, revealed R206 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (intact cognitive responses) out of 15. During observation and interview on 03/12/2024 at 02:20 p.m., R206 was observed lying in bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents receive showers according to their personal preferences for three residents (#206, #47, #4)) of four residents reviewed for hygiene and grooming, resulting in missed bath/showers. Findings Included: Resident #206 (R206) Review of the medical record demonstrated R206 was admitted to the facility 02/20/2024 with diagnoses that included central cord syndrome at the cervical spinal cord (causing impairment of upper limb motor function), abnormalities in gait and mobility, muscle spasm of back, rheumatoid arthritis, low back pain, overactive bladder, quadriplegia, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), anxiety, constipation, insomnia, heart disease, hypertension, pain in upper left arm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/2024, revealed R206 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (intact cognitive responses)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assessment/intervention for bowel constipation for one resident (#206) of 14 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings Included: Review of the medical record demonstrated R206 was admitted to the facility 02/20/2024 with diagnoses that included central cord syndrome at the cervical spinal cord (causing impairment of upper limb motor function), abnormalities in gait and mobility, muscle spasm of back, rheumatoid arthritis, low back pain, overactive bladder, quadriplegia, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), anxiety, constipation, insomnia, heart disease, hypertension, pain in upper left arm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/2024, revealed R206 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (intact cognitive responses) out of 15. During observation and interview on 03/12/2024 at 02:25 p.m. R206 was observed lying in bed. R206 explained that she had a history of constipation, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for contracture management for two residents (#32, #206) of two residents reviewed resulting in the potential for worsening contractures and pain. Findings Included: Resident #32 (R32) Review of the medical record demonstrated R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), hypertension, depression, anxiety, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), Pseudobulbar affect (inappropriate involuntary laughing and crying due to a nervous system disorder), tachycardia, muscle spasm, cognitive impairment, psychosis (loss of external reality), conduct disorder, chronic pain, personality and behavior disorder, dysphasia (difficulty understanding spoken language), and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/13/2024, revealed R32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #4) out of four residents received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: Resident #4 (R4) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 (R4) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart disease with heart failure, supra-pubic catheter, neurogenic bladder (overactive). According to Resident #4 (R4)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R4 scored 10 out of 15 (Moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R4 required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, getting dressed and personal hygiene. Record review did reveal visit notes from [name redacted] psychiatric services for dates of 01/17/24, 01/19/24, 01/26/24 and 02/07/24. [Name redacted] visit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications in three (Resident #12 and #18) of 8 reviewed for medications , resulting in increased risk of adverse drug reactions and R18's hospital admission related to sepsis due to urinary tract infection(UTI). Findings include: Resident #12 (R12) R12's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/08/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short cognitive screener, score of 00 (00-07 Severe Impairment). R12's care plan dated 11/24/23 revealed she had the diagnoses of insomnia, depression, dementia, unspecified psychosis, and high cholesterol. In review of R12's physician orders, Levothyroxine 50 micrograms (mcg) was ordered on 8/14/23 for the diagnosis of hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormones). R12 was also taking Seroquel (antipsychotic) 250…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications in one of three reviewed for psychotropic medications (Resident #44), resulting in increased risk of adverse drug reactions. Findings include: Findings include: Resident #44(R44) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R44's admission date to the facility was on 7/21/2022 and she had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder with delusions (fixed, false conviction in something that was not real or shared by other people). Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 00 which indicated her cognition was severely impaired (00-07 severe impairment). R44 was receiving Hospice care as of 1/2/2024. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that R44 received haloperidol lactate (Haldol) oral concentrate for agitation, 2 mg/ml (milligrams/milliliter) .5 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal immunization in two of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #12 & #18), resulting in an increased risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease. Findings include: Resident #12 (R12) R12's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/08/24, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short cognitive screener, score of 00 (00-07 Severe Impairment). In review of R12's immunization record, she was [AGE] years old, received the Prevnar 13 vaccine on 11/22/14. In review of R12's clinical record, there were no offering or education of the Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (Prevnar 20/PCV 20). Resident #18 (R18) In review of R18's clinical record, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was [AGE] years old and had the Prevnar-13 vaccine on 9/14/16. There was no consent or education…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain staff documentation of COVID-19 screening, education, offering and current COVID-19 vaccination status of one of one staff reviewed, resulting in increased risk for COVID-19 infections. Findings include: The employee file for Registered Nurse (RN) F was reviewed and did not contain documentation of COVID-19 vaccination screening, education, offering of COVID-19 vaccines and status. Human Resources Director J was interviewed on 03/14/24 at 12:02 PM and stated she was not aware the facility had to provide education on the COVID-19 vaccine and was not able to provide any COVID-19 documentation regarding RN F. COVID-19 Vaccination policy dated 12/01/23 indicated the facility would maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination and include at a minimum: a. Education to the staff regarding the risks, benefits, and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine; b. The offering of the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine; c. The COVID-19 vaccine status of staff and related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident needs through support of resident choice in bathing, a toileting program, equipment needs, and services, in one of three residents reviewed for rehabilitation services (Resident #5), resulting in lack of progress in meeting resident goals for discharge. Findings include: Resident #5 (R5) R5 was observed lying in bed on his back on 2/08/24 at 10:50 AM. R5 stated he had not received therapy services he needed since he was admitted to the facility. R5 stated his goal was to return home and live independently as he did before he had back surgery a few months prior. R5 stated after his back surgery he transferred to a rehabilitation hospital for therapy, and bowel and bladder training. R5 stated he had not had a shower in over a month. R5 stated he had received bed baths, but preferred showers. R5 stated he had acne from not receiving a shower. R5 stated his pain was worse after the fall from the transfer lift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 53 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, decreased interior food service equipment illumination, and plumbing water leaks. Findings include: On 12/11/22 at 09:20 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Food Service Director H. The following items were noted: On 12/11/22 at 09:23 A.M., An interview was conducted with Food Service Director H regarding rodent activity within the food production kitchen. Food Service Director H stated: One rodent was caught in a snap trap approximately one month ago. The True one-door reach-in freezer was observed missing the interior light bulb. One of two Garland convection oven interior light assemblies were observed non-functional. The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 6-303.11 states: The light intensity shall be: (A) At least 108 lux (10 foot candles) at a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00130932 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 6 (Resident #'s 14, 18, 21, 27, 48 and 50) of 15 reviewed for comprehensive care planning, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and services. Findings include: Resident #50 According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and 10/10/22, Resident 50 (R50) was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility in July 2022 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. On 12/11/22 at 02:17 PM, R50 was observed in her room, she did not respond to simple questions, but did smile when surveyor greeted her. On the wall next to R50's bed , was notebook paper taped to the wall observed with key words from Spanish to English i.e. hola-Hello, aqua-water etc . Review of R50's medical record revealed R50 was born in Mexico and her primary language was Spanish, but at one point R 50 was bilingual. On 12/14/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for 4 (Residents #1, #14, #40, #21) of 15 reviewed for care plans resulting in the potential for inadequate/inappropriate care plan interventions and unmet resident needs. Findings include: Resident #1 Resident #1 (R1) initially admitted to facility 4/8/2016 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, anemia, right ankle contracture, left ankle contracture, osteoporosis, polyneuropathy, and urge incontinence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/6/22 revealed that R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 (severe cognitive impairment). Section G of MDS revealed that R1 required one-person extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene; one-person total dependence with toilet use; and two-person total dependence with transfer. Section H of MDS reflected that R1 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Section M of MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake M100130932 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents of eight residents (R21and R40) receive the necessary care and services for activities of daily living resulting in potential unmet care needs. Findings Include: Resident #21(R21) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R21 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia, coronary heart disease, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, seizure disorder, schizophrenia, and mantic depression. The MDS reflected R21had a BIM (assessment tool) score which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired, and she required one person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on unit, dressing, eating, toileting, hygiene, and bathing. During an observation on 12/11/22 at 9:07 AM, R21 was laying on an air mattress positioned low with hospital gown on with head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00130932 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meaningful activities for three Resident (R18, R21and R40) of seven residents reviewed for meaningful activities. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for boredom and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #18(R18) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected R18 was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and mood disorder. The MDS reflected R18 had a BIM (assessment tool) score which indicated his ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 12/11/22 at 10:27 a.m., R18 was sitting in wheelchair in room. R18 reported not a lot of interest in captivities offered at facility. R18 reported likes to watch TV but not many activities of interest for men. Review of the most recent Life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has 2 Deficient Practice Statements: (A) & (B) (A) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete routine post fall assessments and ensure timely completion of a stat x-ray order for 1 (Resident #20) of 15 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in delayed identification and treatment of a fracture, and increased pain. Findings include: Resident # 20 (R20) initially admitted to facility 8/5/21 with most recent facility readmission 9/22/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic pain, displaced fracture of left femur, and morbid obesity. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/13/22 revealed that R20 had highly impaired hearing but had clear speech and was understood and understands with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 (severe cognitive impairment). Section G of MDS revealed that R20 required two-person extensive assistance with bed mobility, two-person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This Citation Pertains To Intakes: MI00128361, MI00130337, MI00130932, MI00129672, Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff for 8 of 9 resident council members, resulting in the potential for all 54 residents who resided at the facility to not attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility's CMS-672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 12/11/22 revealed the facility's census was 54, of which 48 required assistance of one or two staff for bathing, 52 required assistance of one or two staff for dressing, 38 required assistance of one or two staff for transferring, 38 required assistance of one or two staff for toilet use, and 21 required assistance of one or two staff for eating. The CMS-672 also revealed 6 residents were dependent on staff for bathing, 0 were dependent on staff for dressing, 7 were depending on staff for transferring, 9 were dependent on staff for toilet use, and 2 were dependent on staff for eating.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN C, N, II) had specific competencies and skills necessary to meet resident needs, failed ensure two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA GG and JJ) of two CNA's reviewed for nursing competencies had their required annual competency evaluation in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents, resulting in the potential for nursing staff to lack the necessary qualifications and training to adequately care for the needs of the residents, and failed to ensure one Hospitality Aide (E) ie. non-certified/ trained staff provide services within their scope of practice. Findings include: On 12/21/22 at 4:45PM, during a review of Personnel records, it was discovered LPN C with a hire date of 12/14/21, LPN N with a hire date of 3/19/14 and LPN II with a hire date of 5/19/20 did not have any nurse competencies and or performance reviews. Review of CNA personnel records for CNA GG hired 4/8/15 and CNA JJ with a hire date of 11/02/21 had no annual competency evaluation in skills and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were educated in behavioral care training for two of three residents (R40 and R49) reviewed for behavioral care resulting in the potential all 24 residents residing in the Dementia unit to receive adequate behavioral care. Findings Include; Resident #49 (R49) Review of the medical record reflected R49 was originally admitted to the facility 06/15/2022 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. Record review on 07/29/2022 reflected behavior notes on R49 who continues 15-minute checks because other residents were wondering in his room. In an interview on 12/21/22 at 11:02 AM, Social Worker (SW) D stated the facility does not have a behavioral program. SW D was provided documentation showing 15-minute checks being performed on R49. SW D was asked why R49 was placed on 15-minute checks. SW D stated I am not sure why we put him on 15 mins checks. During an interview and record review on 12/21/22 at 02:05 PM, Human Resources (HR) S…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #22 According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], (R22) scored 00 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of R22's monthly pharmacy reviews and recommendations reflected the January 27, 2021 pharmacy recommendation read Evaluated the patient immunological history in the chart and noticed this patient may be a candidate for pneumococcal vaccination. There was no written response from the Physician, and no signed consent or refusal from R22's legal guardian. It was requested that a signed physician copy of the pharmacy recommendation be provided on 12/20/22 On 12/14/22 at 11:41 AM, during an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) B she reported being new to her role and did not have an insight or knowledge how Pharmacy services work, along with the process and protocols. R22's signed pharmacy recommendation for January 2021…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation includes two Deficiet Practice Statements A and B. DPS A Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review Infection Control Policies and Program annually resulting in the potential of not following the most current Infection Control Standards of Practice and resulting in the potential for the spread of infection for all 53 Residents that reside at the facility. Findings Included: During record review of the provided facility policies regarding Infection Control no documents listed a date that the policies were implemented and no date that the policies had been reviewed annually. In an interview on 12/21/22 08:43 a.m. Nursing Home Administrator A explained that the facility Infection Control Policies are reviewed annually in a QA (Quality Assurance) Committee meeting. When asked to provide documentation demonstrating that review of the facility Infection Control Policies had been completed annually, NHA A explained that she would have to locate that information and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to offer pneumococcal and influenza immunization for three Residents (Residents #22, #356, and #357) out of 6 reviewed and failed to provide written declination of those immunizations refused for two Residents (Residents #6 and #29) out of six Residents resulting in the potential for increased risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications of pneumococcal or influenza disease and the potential for miscommunication and misunderstanding of Residents immunization preferences. Findings Included: Resident #6 (R6) Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility 05/22/2017 with diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic kidney disease, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of cholesterol plaque on the walls of arteries), depression, kidney failure, hypermagnesemia (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to offer COVID-19 Immunization, obtain complete declination for COVID-19 Immunization, provide COVID-19 Immunization education for five resident representatives or residents (residents #6,#29, #35, #356, and #357) out of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 Immunization resulting in the potential for miscommunication and misunderstanding of Resident COVI-19 Immunization preferences. Findings included: Resident #6 (R6) Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility 05/22/2017 with diagnoses that included type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic kidney disease, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of cholesterol plaque on the walls of arteries), depression, kidney failure, hypermagnesemia (high magnesium levels in the blood), and first-degree heart block (slow conduction of the atrioventricular node of the heart). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 53 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, decreased illumination, and plumbing leaks. Findings include: On 12/12/22 at 08:35 A.M., The drywall surface was observed bowed out between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The damaged drywall surface alignment was observed to bow approximately 6-inches away from the remaining non-damaged symmetrical corridor drywall surfaces. On 12/12/22 at 08:40 A.M., The flooring surface was observed separated from the metal door frame, within Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. The distance observed between the flooring surface and metal door frame was approximately 1.5 - 2.0 inches. On 12/12/22 at 08:45 A.M., The metal double door frame between Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed separated from the flooring surface on the right-hand side. The distance observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and 6 of 9 from the confidential group meeting, the facility failed to provide effective pest control services effecting 53 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for insect and rodent infestations. Findings include: On 12/11/22 at 09:23 A.M., An interview was conducted with Food Service Director H regarding rodent activity within the food production kitchen. Food Service Director H stated: One rodent was caught in a snap trap approximately one month ago. On 12/12/22 at 09:15 A.M., A gap, measuring approximately 1.0 - 1.5 inches wide, was observed between the metal emergency exit door surface and the metal weather stripping panel. The metal emergency exit door was located adjacent to Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] (Central Supply). On 12/12/22 at 10:42 A.M., An interview was conducted with Environmental Services Director F regarding the facility Pest Control Program. Environmental Services Director F stated: Our pest control contract is with (Pest Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #40 According to the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] resident 40 (R40) was a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility with diagnosis that include severe intellectual disabilities, early onset Alzheimer's, Bi-polar disorder, anxiety, Down syndrome unspecified. R40 scored 00 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Of note, further record review revealed R40 had a court appointed guardian, no contact with family, and had no visitors. R40 was observed on 12/11/22 at approximately 12:00 pm, sitting alone at a table in the dining room, her hair had not been combed, she wore mismatched clothing and had a disheveled appearance. Unidentified staff delivered R40 her lunch and walked away to assist other residents. R40 was observed to eat with her fingers (there was a fork provided) no verbal or physical cueing was provided to assist R40 to use utensils, after several minutes passed, R40 was then observed to consume part of her meal by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide advanced written notice prior to a room change for one resident (#20) reviewed for room changes which resulted in reported frustration with the potential for increased anxiety, misunderstanding of the reason for the room change, and the lack of opportunity for resident questions. Findings include: Resident # 20 (R20) initially admitted to facility 8/5/21 with most recent facility readmission 9/22/22 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic pain, displaced fracture of left femur, and morbid obesity. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/13/22 revealed that R20 had highly impaired hearing but had clear speech and was understood and understands with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 (severe cognitive impairment). Section G of MDS revealed that R20 required two-person extensive assistance with bed mobility, two-person total dependence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that grievances were promptly documented, investigated, tracked and resolved for 9 of 9 members of the Resident Council resulting in unresolved complaints, anger and frustration. Findings Include: On 12/13/22 at 10:00 am, during the Resident Council meeting, 9 of 9 participants reported their complaints are frequently not addressed, responded to timely and/or go resolved without explanation. Members of the Resident Council reported they felt unheard, ignored and angry. Review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 6/8/22 reflected concerns related to meal trays taking to long, dietary staff not reading tickets (resulting in food preference not being followed) , rooms not clean, lack of Nursing staff along with nursing staff being rude. Resolutions to the 6/08/22 Resident council meeting were to continue with tray audits, all staff to assist with passing trays, educate housekeeping staff and complete check off lists, and Staffing- staffing to get more staff. The 7/6/22 Resident Council Minutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure updated and accurate advance directive information was in place for three residents (Resident #7, #21, #27) of five reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility, or other healthcare providers. Findings Include: Review of the MICHIGAN DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE PROCEDURE ACT, Act 193 of 1996 (Revised 3-25-14), revealed that, An order executed under this section shall be on a form described in section 4. The order shall be dated and executed voluntarily and signed by each of the following persons: (a) The declarant, the declarant's patient advocate, or another person who, at the time of the signing, is in the presence of the declarant and acting pursuant to the directions of the declarant. (b) The declarant's attending physician. (c) Two witnesses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of physical and verbal involving 2 residents (#40 and 25), of 6 residents that were reviewed for abuse, resulting in Resident 40 being verbally and physically abused. Findings include: Resident #25 According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident 25 (R25) was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility with diagnosis of dementia and bi-polar disorder. The MDS revealed R25 had long and short term memory impairment with severely impaired decision making skills. Resident #40 Review of Nursing progress notes dated 11/30/2022 reflected Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CC walked by R40's room at 12:30 am and observed R25 was slapping R40 and calling R40 names. Upon CNA CC trying to intervene, R25 then became verbally and physically aggressive with CNA CC, at which time CNA EE entered and separated R25 and R40. Review of the facility Incident report dated 11/30/22 reflected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for two of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (#25 and 40). Resulting in allegations of abuse not being reported to the State Agency and the potential for additional allegations of abuse to go unreported. Resident #25 According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident 25 (R25) was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility with diagnosis of dementia and bi-polar disorder. The MDS revealed R25 had long and short term memory impairment with severely impaired decision making skills. Resident #40 Review of Nursing progress notes dated 11/30/2022 reflected Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) CC walked by R40's room at 12:30 am and observed R25 was slapping R40 and calling R40 names. Upon CNA CC trying to intervene, R25 then became verbally and physically aggressive with CNA CC, at which time CNA EE entered and separated R25 and R40. Review of the facility Incident report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three (Resident #21, #27, #50) of 15 reviewed, resulting in inaccurate MDS assessments and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #27 (R27) Review of the medical record revealed R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic osteomyelitis, diabetes, anxiety, depression, and dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/18/22 revealed R27 scored 00 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), had an indwelling catheter in place, was always incontinent of urine, had one or more unhealed pressure ulcers, yet none were documented under each stage of pressure ulcers. R27's MDS was also not coded for any venous or arterial ulcers. On 12/20/22 at 9:55 AM, R27 was observed asleep in bed. R27 had an indwelling catheter in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to M100130932. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess pressure injury risk, and failed to accurately and routinely assess and document pressure injury presentation in one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injuries resulting in the potential for delayed healing, wound deterioration, and the formation of additional pressure injuries. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) initially admitted to facility 4/8/2016 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, anemia, right ankle contracture, left ankle contracture, osteoporosis, polyneuropathy, and urge incontinence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/6/22 revealed that R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 (severe cognitive impairment). Section G of MDS revealed that R1 required one-person extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene; one-person total dependence with toilet use; and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of routine post dialysis monitoring, assessments, and documentation for one resident (Resident #14) of one reviewed for dialysis, resulting in the potential for unidentified change in condition and complications post dialysis treatment. Findings include: Resident #14 (R14) admitted to facility 10/1/19 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, asthma, anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and congestive heart failure. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/20/22 revealed R14 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Further review of the medical record revealed that R14 received dialysis treatment, at an outpatient dialysis center, on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. During an observation and interview on 12/11/22 at 9:47 AM, R14 was observed sitting in a wheelchair at bedside with oxygen in place at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. R14 stated that her kidneys were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse was on duty for 8 consecutive hours a day for seven days a week, resulting in the likelihood of inadequate coordination of emergency or routine care with negative clinical outcomes affecting all 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings include Review of the PBJ report, dated 4/1/22 through 6/30/22, reflected facility was triggered for failing to have Licensed Nursing coverage 24 Hours/Day for four or more days within the quarter. During an interview and record review on 12/21/22 at 3:40 PM, Requested staffing from Scheduler GG for following dates: 5/8/22 (Sunday), 5/21/22 (Saturday), 5/22/22 (Sunday), 5/30/22 (Monday), 6/4/22 (Saturday), 6/5/22 (Sunday), 6/19/22 (Sunday). Scheduler GG reported started as scheduler mid June 2022 and reported does not submit data for PBJ reports. Scheduler GG reported creates schedules according to census per direction of Facility Owner LL. Scheduler GG reported had been the owner since 7/1/21. Scheduler GG reported attempts to schedule Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA GG and JJ) whose in-service training files were reviewed, had the required 12 hours of in-service training, resulting in the potential for unmet educational needs and missed opportunity for improved quality of care and services provided to the residents. Findings include: Review of CNA personnel records for CNA GG hired 4/8/15 and CNA JJ with a hire date of 11/02/21 revealed there was not 12 hours of training, education and or in-service. On 12/21/22 at 2:05 pm, during an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) B and Human Resources (HR) S they reported they had a recent mandatory training in early December, HR S stated the training was approximately 2 hours in length and that was the only documented education, in-service training she had for any of the CNA's over the last 12 months. When queried why the requirement was not met, DON B reported the facility did not have time to train provide in-services upon orientation therefore the facility did not have time to do it on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when five medication errors were observed from a total of twenty-nine opportunities for two residents (Resident # 30 and # 8) of five reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 17.24% and the potential for reduced efficacy of medications and increased risk of adverse reactions/side effects. Findings include: Resident #30 On 12/13/22 at 8:33 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C was observed preparing multiple medications for Resident #30 (R30) including one Aspirin 325milligram (mg) enteric coated tablet and one Docusate Sodium 100mg tablet. After preparing the medications, LPN C was observed to administer the medications to R30 and then proceeded to document the medications as given in the electronic medical record. On 12/13/22, a review of R30's medical record was complete. During the review, a physician's order dated 12/24/2020 read, Aspirin Tablet 325mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day . and a physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements and over the counter medications were not expired and discarded. Resulting in the potential for altered potency and efficacy for the 53 residents receiving nutritional supplements and over the counter medications out of the medication room. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 08:30 AM with LPN N regarding the number of medications. LPN N stated we have 2 med rooms, one on north and one on south. Med room- north-(Dementia unit) 3 bottles of Zinc 50mg expired on 08/22. On [DATE] at 08:45 A.M., A common area environmental tour was continued with Environmental Service Director F. The following item was noted: North Unit: Medical Supply Room: Two full cases of Glucerna Rich Chocolate nutritional supplement were observed with an expiration date that read [DATE]. One full case of Glucerna Creamy Strawberry nutritional supplement was also observed with an expiration date that read [DATE]. Environmental Services Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Certified Activities Director was employed at the facility, resulting in potential for all 53 residents to not be provided with meaningful activities. In an interview on 12/14/22 at 07:59 AM Activity Director certification. AD P stated she was not a certified as an activity director, but stated the facility set her up for an online program. however, the AD P had not started the program yet. Admin A sent an email that revealed that AD P was to start her training on 12/14/22 at 08:50 AM. On 12/14/22 at 09:58 AM and email was emailed was received from Admin A that AD P had not been signed up, until 12/14/22 Writer received second email from training site dated 12/14/22 at 09:58 AM reflecting AD P had been signed up for this online program at this date and time. In a continued interview with AD P on 12/14/22 at 07:59 AM, AD P stated she had been in her active role of AD for one year without training prior to this registration for the online certification program on 12/14/22.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper communication/documentation of the services that Hospice had provided to two of two residents (R48 and R21) reviewed for Hospice services, resulting in a lack of coordination of care between the facility and Hospice. Findings include: Resident #48 (R48) Review of R48's electronic medical record (EMR) upon R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] hospice services were already in place. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (causes weakness and shortness of breath), Dementia, muscle weakness. Record review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/1/2022, revealed R48 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15, which indicated R48 had severely impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS R48 required use of a wheelchair for maximum assistance with all personal care. During an interview on 12/12/22 at 03:20 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N regarding care coordination with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-05-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing posting was dated with the year and included the actual hours worked by category of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff (i.e., Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)) directly responsible for resident care per shift. Findings include: On 05/05/25 at approximately 1:30 PM, the daily nursing staffing posting was noted on a table, in the main lobby. The posting was dated, May 5th and included the total amount of hours worked for day shift and night shift for RNs, LPNs and CNAs. The current year and shift times were not included on the posting. On 05/06/25 at 2:11 PM, the daily nursing staffing posting was noted in the main lobby. The posting was dated, May 6th and included the total amount of hours worked for day shift and night shift for RNs, LPNs and CNAs. The current year and shift times were not included on the posting. On 05/07/25 at 8:11 AM, the daily nursing staffing posting was noted in the main lobby. The posting was dated, May 7th and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a COVID-19 vaccine per consent for one (R33) of five reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/31/25 revealed R33 scored 00 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R33's spouse was their Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) for Healthcare. According to R33's immunization history, the most recent COVID-19 vaccine was administered on 11/7/23. Review of the COVID-19 Vaccine Consent Form revealed R33's DPOA gave verbal consent for the COVID-19 vaccine on 8/28/24. R33 did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine per consent. In an interview on 05/08/25 at 1:14 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B and Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist (ADON/IP) J were not able to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00142383. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of other residents by thoroughly investigating allegations of abuse for one (Resident #2) of three reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for abuse to occur with other residents. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) During record review it was revealed that during a video call on 1/12/2024, R2 reported to a family member and the Activities Director (AD) C that they put their penis in my butt. As a result, the facility submitted a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 1/12/2024 regarding sexual abuse to the State Agency. The FRI investigation was completed and submitted to the State Agency on 1/19/2024. Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system), anxiety, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), depression and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-12-22 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Survey Book was consistently readily available, and that the book was maintained to include the facility plan of correction for identified deficiencies. Resulting in the potential for residents and visitors to be uninformed. Findings include: On 12/13/22 at 10:00 am, during the Resident Council meeting, 9 of 9 participants reported that they were aware of the location of the survey book was, however it frequently would be missing for extended periods of time. One group participant stated, they wished the facility had documented on how they would correct the issues identified by the State Agency. On the afternoon of 12/13/22, the survey book was located across from the main dining room, review of the survey book reflected an abbreviated survey was conducted on 3/16/22 with two citations issued, one at harm level. The report in the survey book did not include the plan of correction, just as the Resident Council participant had described. On 12/20/22 at 02:51 PM, during an interview with Activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$133,946 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $51,875 — penalty dated 2025-04-17
- $82,071 — penalty dated 2024-02-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-15 for 99 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-12 for 55 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINNACLE BATTLE CREEK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2023 |
| ISHAKIS, YOCHANAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 60% | since 04/01/2023 |
| LEVINE, YISROEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 40% | since 04/01/2023 |
| EVANS, KAY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 05/18/2023 |
| MENDOZA, VIOLET | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 04/01/2023 |
| ZENITH CARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $286K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235536. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.