Tuscola County Medical Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 135.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.28 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.19 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent development and worsening of pressure ulcers for two residents (Resident #24, Resident #37), resulting in the worsening of a skin injury for Resident #24 and a facility-acquired Stage III pressure ulcer for Resident #37. Findings include: Record review of facility 'Skin Care' policy dated 11/8/2022 revealed a head-to-toe skin assessment is completed and documented on all residents upon admission by a licensed nurse and/or registered nurse, and weekly skin assessment thereafter by licensed or registered nurse that is documented in EMR. Skin Risk assessment to be completed on admission, weekly for 4 weeks then quarterly with MDS schedule and as needed. All residents will be reviewed for appropriate pressure relief interventions in place. Nursing will assess and plan additional interventions as needed. The focus of the skin assessment is to: (1.) Promote the health of the skin and identify residents at risk for skin breakdown. (2.)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 12/9/25 at 10:15 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) C. The following observations were made: -A drain from the walk-in freezer drained into a hole in the floor. The tube was lower than the floor. -A drain that the DM reported she thought it was for the ice machine, was observed going into a cut out from the floor drain area and did not have an air gap. The drainpipe was below the level of the floor. There was another plastic tubing in the cut-out floor drainage area that was wrapped around the inside of the drain box in the floor. The tubing was below the level of the floor and debris was noted where the piping lay. -Osmosis system had a black tube inside slotted box drain in the floor. The black tube was below the level of the floor. -Nosey cups were stored in a plastic container with the lid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate backflow prevention was installed at plumbing fixtures, resulting in the potential for contamination of the water supply, affecting all residents. Findings include: On 12/11/2025 at approximately 12:41pm-1:24pm during the environmental tour with the Life Safety Officer B, observed a hose attached to a spigot without a backflow preventer at the cold water line located in the boiler room. On 12/11/2025 at approximately 12:41pm-1:24pm observed the water softener drain line sitting directly inside a drain. On 12/11/2025 at approximately 12:41pm-1:24pm observed a utility sink with a chemical feed downstream of an atmospheric vacuum breaker located in the housekeeping closets in Rooms 278, 206, 136, and 178. On 12/12/2025 at 9:00-9:40am observed a utility sink with an attached chemical dispenser downstream of an atmospheric vacuum breaker located in the janitor's closet in Cortland House. On 12/12/2025 at 9:00-9:40am observed a utility sink…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' rights were being met by 1) Ensuring that call lights were within reach or easily accessible to residents and/or 2) Ensuring that call lights were responded to in a timely manner for four residents (R11, R74, R78 and R121) of four residents sampled for accommodation of needs and also a Confidential Group of Residents. Findings include:Resident #11 (R11): On 12/11/25 at 12:32 PM, an observation was made of Resident 11 sitting up in his wheelchair, propelling himself in his room. An observation was made of the Resident's call light positioned on the floor underneath the bed. The call light hung from the wall and the bed was positioned up against the wall. The call light was lying on the floor between the wall and the bed. The call light was not within reach for R11. The Resident was asked for help. A staff member was alerted to the Resident needing assistance from staff found in the hallway and was informed of the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was palatable and maintained at a palatable temperature for one resident (Resident #68) of three residents reviewed for food palatability and a group of confidential residents. Findings include: Cold food complaints with a Confidential Group of Residents On 12/10/25 at 10:32 AM, a Confidential Group of Residents were interviewed. The group consisted of 18 Residents. The majority of Residents were able to answer questions and engaged in a group conversation. The Residents were asked about issues they had with the care received at the facility. The Confidential Group of Residents reported concerns with food being too cold to eat. Six of the Residents reported that food was not warm enough sometimes when they received the food in their room and other residents reported that sometimes the food that should be warmer was cold in the dining room as well. One resident reported getting eggs that were not at a good temperature to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure ongoing collaboration with hospice care for one resident (R56) of two residents sampled for hospice care, resulting in the absence of documentation of care provided by hospice. Findings include:Resident #56 (R56): R56 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dementia, prediabetes and hypothyroidism. On 12/11/2025 at 3:00PM, record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a physician's order for hospice care is present in the chart and dated 5/2/25. On 12/11/2025 at 3:05PM, record review of the EMR did not reveal any hospice documentation for R56. On 12/11/2025 at 3:13PM, Unit Manager (UM) A, provided the hospice binder for R56 that is stored at the nurse's station. On 12/11/2025 at 3:14PM, record review of the hospice binder was conducted. Record review revealed documents of Nurse and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) visits from 5/8/25 to 8/1/25. The documents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for pressure ulcer management for one resident (Resident #33) of five residents reviewed resulting in lack of comprehensive identification and assessment of wound etiology and lack of correct application of pressure reduction devices. Findings include:Resident #33:On 12/11/25 at 10:07 AM, Resident #33 was observed in their room lying in bed. The Resident was positioned flat on their back with bilateral Prevalon heel boots (soft, cushioned boot which floats the heels off of a mattress or surface for pressure reduction) in place. The boots were positioned incorrectly and Resident #33's heels were not in the open area designed for the heel in the boot. Resident #33's heels were positioned directly on the side of the boot. An interview was completed at this time. When queried if they were having any pain, Resident #33 replied in my feet. When asked to rate their pain on a scale of zero to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure analyzed observational data of personal cares with a continued spread of a Multi-Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO), 2) Failed to ensure proper Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) use, 3) Failed to ensure proper hand hygiene, 4) Failed to ensure proper wound care, 5) Failed to ensure proper perineal (peri) care for two residents (Resident #40, Resident $45) of two residents reviewed for peri-care and 6) Failed to prevent a wound infection for one resident (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in the continued in-house spread of Proteus Mirabilis infections, staff not following enhanced barrier precautions and providing clean cares with the likelihood of the further spread of infections. Findings include: On 10/16/24, at 11:56 AM, a record review of the facility provided infection control line listing revealed the following case counts of In-House MDRO Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): 5/2024 Case List…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop person-centered comprehensive care plans for Code Status preferences for five residents (Resident #4, Resident #17, Resident #22, Resident #66, Resident #68) of 29 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for residents not to receive individualized care, which could lead to a decline in condition, and/or a negative outcome. Findings Include: A record review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan, Care plan review and Care Plan Conferences, date implemented [DATE], date reviewed [DATE] and date revised [DATE], provided (The facility) will ensure that all residents have a Baseline Care Plan completed per the Baseline Care Plan Policy, and a comprehensive Care Plan in the e- chart within 7 days of completion of section Z of the admission MDS assessment . The Care Plan will provide staff with guidelines on resident care needs . Resident #4: Advance Directives A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to follow facility policy for indwelling catheter use for five residents (R17, R22, R51, R52, R106) of six residents reviewed, resulting in physician's orders not having catheter size, dignity bags touching the floor and recurrent UTI's (urinary tract infections). Findings include: Resident #52 (R52): R52 is [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and history of urinary tract infections. On 10/14/24 at 10:27AM, observation revealed that R52 had an indwelling catheter, the urine collection bag was hanging below the bed, covered by a dignity bed and off the floor. On 10/16/24, record review of the admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed that R52 was admitted with an indwelling catheter. On 10/16/24, record review of R52's care plan revealed a care plan for the indwelling catheter that was last revised on 12/27/2023. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and medical supplies were stored and disposed of per professional standards of practice in two of five medication rooms resulting in expired medications and medical supplies, lack of refrigerated vaccine temperature monitoring per CDC recommendations, and the potential for residents to have procedures and testing completed with expired supplies and to receive expired medications with altered potency and efficacy. Findings include: A tour of the Second Redwood Medication Room was completed with Unit Manager Registered Nurse (RN) T on 10/17/24 at 8:34 AM. The following exited medications and medical supplies were present in the medication room: - ProSource NoCarb 15-gram Protein, 30 fluid ounce (oz) container, Expired: 9/28/24 - UTI-Stat, 30 fluid oz container, Expired 7/27/24 - 100 tablet bottle of Aspirin 81 mg tablets, Expired: 9/24 - Three bottles of Prevacid 15 mg tablets with 14 tablets per bottle for Resident #14, Expired 6/24 - Universal Viral Transport for Viruses (Covid)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $8K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI