No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

201 South Front Street, Chesaning, MI 48616 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 51 certified beds · (989) 845-6602 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (989) 845-6602 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$41,898 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $41,898 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-17)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
300 S Chapman St · (989) 845-7644 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
126 W Broad St · (989) 845-3609 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1045 W Broad St · (989) 845-6432 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 S Saginaw St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.0%4.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication50.0%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.0%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table52.3%14.8%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.5%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.6%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.2%11.7%12.0%better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 67% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.2%CMS range 33.7–59.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 8.2–17.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 2.6–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.79
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.77
RN hoursweekends
43.9%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 36.6 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-12)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00138042. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to provide care following professional standards of practice and facility policy to prevent the development of avoidable pressure injuries, 2) Failed to accurately measure and stage residents' pressure injuries, and 3) Failed to promptly identify and provide necessary treatment for a deteriorating pressure injury for four residents (Resident #192, Resident #6, Resident #13, and Resident #26) reviewed for pressure injuries, resulting in R192 requiring emergent surgical intervention for sepsis and acute osteomyelitis of a Stage 4 sacral wound. Additionally, this deficient practice placed all residents residing in the facility at risk for the development of avoidable pressure injuries, a delay in wound treatment, the potential for delayed wound healing, infection, and the high likelihood for overall deterioration in health status. Findings include: Resident #192 (R192): Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-09-01 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00138565. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, 1) ensure a complete and accurate nursing assessment was done after a significant change involving 1 resident (Resident #701), and 2) ensure the facility had a policy to follow for assessment regarding signs/symptoms of infection (not feeling well, increased temp, tiredness, nausea), resulting in hospitalization with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) and sepsis (extensive infection), antibiotic given, and the likelihood for serious injury. Findings Include: Review of the Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (dated 2022 and 2023), hospital records dated 5/13/23, physician's and nurse's notes dated 5/1/23 through 5/14/23, revealed Resident #701 was 62 years-old, admitted to the facility in 2022 and readmitted on 2023, alert but not able to make healthcare decisions, had a pressure ulcer that required a urinary catheter to be put in place to decrease urinary tract infections (UTI's). The residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 12/09/2025 at approximately 11:30 AM during lunch observation with the Certified Dietary Manager E, the rag sanitizer bucket solution was tested with Hydrion QT-40 test strips, and the result was zero. On 12/09/2025 at approximately 11:30 AM during lunch observation with the CDM E, when interviewed on the chemical solution of the rag sanitizer bucket, the CDM E stated that the bucket needed to be changed out, and it is changed when it's visibly soiled or every 2 hours. When asked what the range the chemical solution should be, the CDM E stated it should be 200ppm. According to the 2022 Food Code, 3-304.14 Wiping Cloths, Use Limitation, Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be .Held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution at a concentration specified under S 4-501.114 and The sanitizing solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1). have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), 2). ensure 2 of 2 residents' (Resident's #3 and #35) meet the facility criteria for infections, and 3) do infection control environmental rounds of the main dining room, resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility, an increased unnecessary use of antibiotic therapy, and an unsafe dining room environment. Findings include:Resident #3: Review of the Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (MDS dated 1/25), care plans (dated 9/23/25), and progress notes (dated 9/25), revealed Resident #3 was 67 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], alert and able to make healthcare decisions. The residents' diagnosis included, diabetes, unsteadiness, weakness, and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection/MRSA (resistant to most antibiotics wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from neglect for 3 residents ( #7, #14, #49) of 18 residents reviewed for dignity and the confidential Resident Council group, resulting in verbalizations from the council group of anger regarding call lights not being answered timely, frustration regarding not being able to reach call lights, and a heavy smell of urine in the back hall. Findings Include:Review of the facility's Maintaining Dignity policy, dated 12/25, stated It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances quality of life. Respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. Call Light Availability and Response Time: Review of the facility Call Lights policy (dated 12/25), stated Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedures for 1) Medication labeling and storage in 2 of 2 medication carts, 2) Storage and handling of medications for one medication room of one reviewed, and 3) Consistently monitor the medication refrigerator temperature in accordance with acceptable pharmaceutical standards of practice, for 11 residents (R3, R8, R10, R12, R19, R28, R35, R37, R40, R42, R50) of 11 sampled residents Findings include: Medication cart for Residents rooms 1-12:Observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 12:28 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C of Medication cart rooms 1 through 12. Observation on 12/09/2025 at 12:35 PM of Resident R42 Lantus 100unit/ml multi-dose 10ml vial/bottle with the seal off/used with no date on the vial and the box not dated. LPN C reviewed vial/bottle and then wrote a date on the bottle, although she did not open the vial. Observation on 12/09/2025 at 12:40 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C of Resident R50 had Albuterol Sulfate inhalation 200-meter doses, count of 148…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Mood/Behaviors care plan interventions for 1 resident (Resident #14) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in lack of documentation of any interventions for mood or behaviors and a lack of follow-up with intervention effectiveness. Findings Include:Resident #14:Review of the Face Sheet, MDS (dated 5/25), and care plans (dated 4/25), revealed Resident #14 was 63 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], alert and interviewable with a BIMS of 10 (cognitive assessment, interviewable), and required total assistance with all Activities of Daily Living/ADL's. The residents' diagnosis included, sepsis, back pain, muscle weakness, seizures, difficulty walking, epilepsy, respiratory failure, traumatic brain injury with explosive disorder and hemiplegia of left side (weakness).Review of resident #14's Aggressive/ Behavioral care plan dated 5/7/25, stated Monitor & Document observed behavior and attempted interventions in behavior log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plan interventions for one resident (Resident #2) of 4 sampled residents reviewed. Findings include:Resident R2:Interview and observation on 12/09/2025 at 10:31 AM of Resident #2 (R2) refused to respond to questions but was triggered as a wound infection on the CMS 802 form, so I will need further review. R2 was observed with a blanket pulled over her head and not receptive to conversation from surveyor. Record review of the facility provided CMS 802 form dated 12/9/2025 identified Resident #2 (R2) as not having any pressure ulcer but was identified as having a wound infection. Record review of Resident #2 Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly 11/7/2025 revealed an elderly female with moderately impaired cognitive abilities with decisions poor, requiring cues and supervision. Section GG- Functional abilities of dependent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bath/showers, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident non-weight baring, mechanical lift assist for mobility. Bowel bladder functions with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of Stage II pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #2) of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury, resulting in Resident #2 developing a facility-acquired Stage II pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2):Interview and observation on 12/09/2025 at 10:31 AM of Resident #2 (R2) refused to respond to questions but was triggered as a wound infection on the CMS 802 form, so I will need further review. R2 was observed with a blanket pulled over her head and not receptive to conversation from surveyor. Record review of the facility provided CMS 802 form dated 12/9/2025 identified Resident #2 (R2) as not having any pressure ulcer but was identified as having a wound infection. Record review of Resident #2 Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly 11/7/2025 revealed an elderly female with moderately impaired cognitive abilities with decisions poor, requiring cues and supervision. Section GG- Functional abilities of dependent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bath/showers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the enteral tube feeding (TF) solution was labeled with the resident's name, date, and rate of infusion for one resident (Resident #6) of 1 sampled resident. Findings include: Resident #6:Observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 9:24 AM during the screening process at the beginning of the survey of Resident #6 was observed to be lying in bed. Observation of the bedside revealed an empty bottle/container and tubing of Glucerna 1.5 cal. solution with no resident name, rate, time, date or duration of infusion of feeding material. Observation of the Hospice Registered Nurse M providing care in the room to Resident #6. RN M stated that hospice does not hang feeding tube solution. The state surveyor had the hospice RN M observe the feeding tube bottle and tubing for a name, date, rate. RN M stated Yes, it is empty, and it does not tell you who's it is or how long or rate to run it. Observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 9:26 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) F were brought into Resident #6's room to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor a post-dialysis pressure dressing for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 1 sampled resident, resulting in Resident #3 to be observed with a pressure dressing to the fistula access sites with no date on the dressing or documented nursing assessment. Findings include: Resident #3:In an observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 9:01 AM with Resident #3 was seated up in a wheelchair in her room. Resident #3 stated that she goes to hemodialysis, on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays. The state surveyor observed two pressure dressings to left upper arm, with 4x4 gauze folded and applied with tape, no dates noted on the dressings. Resident #3 stated that I take the dressings off, and if it starts to bleed again i go to the nursing station and tell them. The nurses put a dressing on the area. I also Go to the wound clinic for my left ankle wound. I got the wound at a previous nursing home. it's better now, getting smaller, less painful. Observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 11:45 AM with Resident #3 were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Control Preventionist Licensed Practical Nurse F completed an annual nursing skills competency evaluation for 1 of 2 nurses reviewed. Findings include:Staffing review task: In an interview and records review on 12/11/2025 at 10:57 AM with the Human resource staff member N revealed that there were 4 Registered Nurses, seven Licensed Practical Nurses, and 24 Certified Nursing Assistants available for scheduling. The Staff member N prepared and submitted the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) quarterly. The facility had a full time Director of Nursing. Record review on 12/11/2025 during the staffing task of the survey of professional licensed nurses' annual competencies/skills checklist for the year 202 was not completed for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Infection Control Preventionist/Wound Care nurse F. Human resource staff member N stated She did not have an annual competency check list for 2025 for LPN F and did not know why she does not have one. The former Director of Nursing (DON) did not do it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify targeted behaviors, medication classifications, and the duration of therapy on the informed consents for 3 residents (R5, R6, R22) of 5 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #5:Record review of Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) date 11/30/2025 revealed an elderly resident who was his own responsible party. Review of section I: active medical diagnosis included: debility, heart failure, diabetes, anxiety, depression, bipolar and post-traumatic stress disorder. Section N: Medications identified that the resident received antipsychotic, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant medications. Record review of Resident #5's 'Medication Administration Record' (MAR) for December 2025 revealed medications administered of aripiprazole (Abilify) antipsychotic medication 2mg tablet by mouth in the evening for mood stabilizer. Escitalopram (Lexapro) antidepressant medication 10mg tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. In an interview and record review on 12/11/2025 at 9:07 AM with Social Worker (SW) H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake Number 2585037.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, and homelike environment involving the Therapy room and 5 residents' rooms (Rooms 2, 3, 4, 14, and 19) of 20 rooms in total, resulting in the protentional for injury (therapy equipment stored in the therapy area, increases risk of tripping and falling), resident and family complaint's regarding the environment, anger, dissatisfaction and depression.Findings Include: Self-tour of facility on 8/19/2025 at 9:30AM noted Strong urine odors in the back hall noted coming from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Noted 2 male residents to reside in room, Resident #106 the bed by the window was noted with urinal on nightstand with yellow urine noted with no top on it, half full, next to white Styrofoam drinking glass with a straw. Observations on 8/19/2025 throughout the day of the survey, the urinal was noted to be left on the nightstand not emptied and next to the Styrofoam drinking glass.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake Numbers: 2590687, 2577760, and 2581464. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a decline in the quality of life for one resident (Resident #101) of 6 residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #101 having a change in demeanor of a decrease in activity with an increase in depression of tearfulness. Findings include: Record review of Resident #101's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] quarterly assessment revealed an elderly male resident with medical diagnoses of: Heart failure, Diabetes, anxiety, depression and respiratory failure. Record review of Resident #101's physician orders for the month of August 2025 revealed medications of Abilify (antipsychotic), Lexapro (antidepressant), daily for mood and mental stability. Observation and interview were conducted on 8/19/2025 at 9:55AM with Resident #101 seated up in Wheelchair in the dining room, drinking coffee with other residents. He is interacting with staff members and enjoying himself.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Numbers 2590687, 2577760, and 2581464. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to get a signed informed consent for anti-anxiety medication prior to administering it for one resident (R101), resulting in Resident #101 receiving the medication with no written or verbal consent. Findings include: Record review of Resident #101's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] quarterly assessment revealed an elderly male resident with medical diagnosis of: Heart failure, Diabetes, anxiety, depression and respiratory failure. Record review of Resident #101's physician orders for the month of August 2025 revealed medications of Abilify (antipsychotic), Lexapro (antidepressant), daily for mood and mental stability. Observations and an interview were conducted on 8/19/2025 at 9:55AM with Resident #101, who was seated up in Wheelchair in the dining room, drinking coffee with other residents. He is interacting with staff members and enjoying himself. The interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00151360. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure accurate orders for a feeding tube and 2) Failed to ensure maintenance of the feeding tube, including water flushes, for 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for feeding tubes. Findings Include: Resident #1: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, left sided weakness, tongue and throat cancer, feeding tube, chronic pain syndrome, depression, weakness, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. The MDS assessment, dated 02/08/2025, revealed the resident had full cognitive abilities with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 15/15 and the resident needed some assistance with all care. On 3/26/2025 at 11:29 AM, during an interview with Nurse B, she said Resident #1 had a feeding tube that he had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00151360. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow accepted standards of practice for obtaining a physician's order, assessment and monitoring of a Central Venous Catheter/CVS Mediport IV for one resident (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for IV catheters. Findings Include: Resident #1: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, left sided weakness, tongue and throat cancer, feeding tube, chronic pain syndrome, depression, weakness, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Resident #1 was receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy for the cancer. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had full cognitive abilities with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 15/15 and the resident needed some assistance with all care. On 3/27/2025 at 9:20 AM, Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00151360. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1) Physician's orders for dialysis services; 2) Post- Dialysis assessment and monitoring were completed and 3) Dialysis communication forms were complete and included pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessment, including location and assessment of the dialysis access site for one resident (Resident #4) of 1 resident reviewed for Dialysis care. Findings Include: Dialysis Resident #4: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Chronic kidney disease, receives dialysis, Diabetes, obesity, anemia, gout, hypothyroidism. Hypertension and bipolar disorder. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident full cognitive abilities. On 3/27/2025 at 11:42 AM Nurse C was interviewed about Resident #4 receiving dialysis services, she said the resident did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care regarding implementation of COVID preventive measures in a timely manner during a COVID outbreak emergency, resulting in 11 residents (Resident's #6, #7, #14, #16, #23, #24,#25, #28, #35, #90) and 10 staff members (Nursing Assistant/CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA S, Nurse, LPN G, Social Worker E, Dietary Aide N, Nurse, CNA H, and Dietary Manger A) testing positive for COVID, resulting in one resident's (Resident #7) hospitalization, resulting in rapid spread of COVID throughout the facility and staff members with the likelihood for the continued spread of COVID, resident and staff illness and the hospitalization of (Resident #7. Findings Include: Review of the facility Pandemic COVID-19, Infection Control New Admission's policy dated 2020 (from the facility Emergency Preparedness program-the only COVID policy in the Emergency book found), stated Early prevention of COVID-19 outbreak consists of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that accurate resident information was completed on the Resident Roster Matrix (802) for five residents (Resident #1, Resident #14, Resident #16, Resident #26, Resident #140) of 12 sampled residents, resulting in COVID-positive residents and the likelihood of unmet care needs. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'MDS/CRC Coordinator' job description copyright 2024 The Compliance Store, LLC. position purpose was to conduct and coordinate the completion of the required Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and be responsible for the implementation and ongoing evaluation of each resident's comprehensive plan of care and auditing of medical records for the presence of supporting documentation for all items coded on the MDS. Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 08:30 AM, the surveyors were notified by facility's Social Worker that the facility was having a COVID-positive outbreak and to wear a facial mask. Observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated and revised appropriately with new interventions for four residents (Residents #7, Resident #8, Resident #17, Resident #27) of 12 sampled residents, resulting in revision and interventions necessary for care and services not being care planned with the likelihood for unmet care needs. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Comprehensive Care Plans' policy, dated 8/2024, revealed it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. (5.) The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. Resident #7: In observations and an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent facility-acquired urinary tract infections and follow up on contaminated urine samples for four residents (#7, #8, #9, #31), resulting in the likelihood for urinary tract infections and/or organisms to be unidentified and untreated, bladder injury, pain and decline in overall health status. Findings include: Record review of facility 'Perineal Care' policy copyright 2023, revealed that it is the practice of this facility to provide perineal care to all incontinent residents during routine bath and as needed in order to promote cleanliness and comfort, prevent infection to the extent possible, and to prevent and assess for skin breakdown. Record review of the facility 'Minimum Criteria for Initiation of Antibiotics' policy dated 2017 revealed: Suspected Urinary Tract Infection . Note: Foul smelling or cloudy urine is not a valid indication for initiating antibiotics. Asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be treated with antibiotics.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 medication carts (Rehab Hall and Long-Term Hall medication carts) were clean and sanitized, free of crushed pills, pieces of loose papers and dust in the drawers, and proper medication storage, resulting in the likelihood of cross contamination, low medications count with increased cost and missed resident medications. Findings Include: Observation of facility medication carts done on 10/14/24 at 10:30 a.m., revealed the following: Medication Cart on the Rehab Hall was found to have the second, and third drawers dirty with crushed meds, dust, and papers on the bottom of the carts. During an interview done on 10/14/24 at 10:30 a.m., Nurse, LPN V stated I don't know who is supposed to clean it, maybe third shift. Observation of facility medication carts done on 10/15/24 at 11:39 a.m., revealed the following: Second and third drawers had crushed pills and dirt/dust and pieces of paper on the bottom. In the narcotics drawer,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary and good working condition, and 2) Failed to ensure that partially opened food items had a open and use-by date on them, resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illness with hospitalization, and cross contamination affecting 35 residents who consumed oral nutrition from the facility kitchen and ice machine of a total census of 35 residents. Findings Include: Review of the Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective October 1, 2012, Chapter 4-501.14 directs that equipment cleaning frequency is to be throughout the day at frequency necessary to prevent recontamination of equipment and utensils. Review of the facility Date Marking for Food Safety policy (un-dated), stated The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food. The marking system shall consist of, the day/date of opening, and the day/date the item must be consumed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1) Ensure resident monthly infection data was analyzed for 7/24 and 8/24 for a census of 35 residents, and 2) Ensure enhanced barrier precautions were used during wound care, resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination, resident, and staff illness, antibiotic usage with possible hospitalization. Findings Include: Infection Control Data Analyzing: Review was done of 7/24 and 8/24 facility monthly data reports. Both reports had documentation of infection rates, and the total numbers of each infections. No documentation of any analysis done regarding the infection rates, employee call-ins, antibiotic usage or immunizations was found. During an interview done on 10/15/24 at 10:20 a.m., the Infection Control Nurse/IC, LPN T and Director of Nursing/DON both confirmed there was no analyzing that had been done from the monthly data collected in the Infection Control program. The IC Nurse T stated, I just do what I am told, no one asked me anything (regarding monthly infection rates and residents or staff) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and justify the administration of antibiotic medications for four residents (#7, #8, #9, #31), resulting in Resident #7 and Resident #31 to have recurrent urinary tract infections, Resident #8 and Resident #9 to be receive antibiotic without clinical rational and the likelihood of antibiotic resistance due to an inappropriate usage, resistance or the development of opportunistic organisms, and hospitalizations. Findings include: Record review of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Program' policy 10/2022 revealed the facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines. (6.) Antibiotic Stewardship: (a.) An antibiotic stewardship program will be implemented as part of the overall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment, monitoring and timely provision of care, per professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #7), resulting in a lack of documentation and glucose monitoring with a change of condition with the likelihood for a lack of change of condition and delay in the treatment of low blood glucose level. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity' policy dated 8/2024 revealed it is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life . § 483.25 Quality of care Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weight monitoring timely for two residents (Resident #17, Resident #27) of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of weight monitoring/follow-up of abnormal weights, and the likelihood for unidentified nutritional deficiencies and decline in overall health. Findings include: Record review of facility 'Weight Monitoring' policy dated 8/2024 revealed based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility will ensure that all resident's maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise. (5.) A weight monitoring schedule will be developed upon admission for all residents: (a.) Weights should be recorded at the time obtained . (b.) Residents with weight loss- monitor as directed by Dietitian/designee. (c.) If clinically indicated- monitor weight daily. (d.) All others- monitor weight monthly. (6.) Weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (Resident #22) behavior's were documented and monitored, resulting in the likelihood for increased resident behaviors with no documentation of interventions done or effectiveness, lack of follow-up regarding care plan's, and medication reviews not being accurate. Findings Include: Resident #22: Review of the Face Sheet, care plans and nursing notes dated 10/11/24 though 10/14/24, revealed Resident #22 was 57 years-old, not able to make his own healthcare decisions, and required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living/ADL. Review of the residents diagnosis included, epilepsy, intellectual disabilities, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, major depression, Dementia, and delusional disorders. Review of the residents Behavioral care plan (un-dated), stated (Resident #22) has a behavior problem (repeatedly) yelling out, being sexually inappropriate to staff and purposely throwing myself out of bed for attention. He has attention seeking behaviors and often impulsive. Monitor behavior episodes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consents for antipsychotic medication usage for one resident (Resident #8), resulting in Resident #8 being administered antipsychotic medications without appropriate consent and risk-versus-benefit analysis or medications explained to the resident/responsible party and the increased likelihood for serious side effects and adverse reactions. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Use of Psychotropic Medication' policy dated 8/2024 revealed residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication. (1.) A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotic's, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. (5.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145893. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and safe environment for 11 residents' rooms, 2 main hallways, and 1 residential sitting area, resulting in the likelihood for resident injury (bug and spider bites and hand splinters), anger and frustration from family members and residents, cross contamination with illnesses with increased use of antibiotics. Findings Include: During a walk-through of the facility done on 9/12/24 starting at 10:00 a.m., accompanied by the Administrator, the following concerns were observed: -room [ROOM NUMBER]: Extreme odor of urine near bed 2; resident in bed at the time. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: Several used tissues were observed on the floor near bed 1, the walls had numerous areas of chipping paint and black scuff marks from wheelchairs. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: The bedside curtain between bed 1 and bed 2 had several stains on it. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: The bedside curtain had several areas of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145893. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #103), had the required Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care (showers) of 6 residents reviewed for ADL's, resulting in an increased likelihood for offensive odors, skin issues, and decreased self-esteem with isolation. Findings Include: Resident #103: Review of the Face Sheet, Care Plans dated 6/22, and shower sheets (dated 7/3/24, 7/16/24 and 7/23/24), revealed Resident #103 was 69 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], was cognitively impaired and unable to make healthcare decisions, and required staff assistance with all ADL's. The residents diagnosis included, stroke with severe cognitive impairment, seizures, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, mood disturbance, and diabetes. Review of the facility ADL care plan (6/22) stated assist with ADL's. During an interview done on 9/16/24 at 11:18 a.m., the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00135195 and MI00138197. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for medication administration vital sign assessments for 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #10, Resident #26, Resident #21, Resident #14, and Resident #3) reviewed for provision of nursing services, resulting in medications administered late, medications administered outside of physician-ordered parameters, medication errors without management follow through, incomplete laboratory testing, and the potential for less than therapeutic effects of medications, decreased effectiveness of medications, and the potential for a delay in treatment and the worsening of medical conditions. Findings: Resident #2 (R2): Review of an admission Record revealed R2 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: hypotension (low blood pressure). Review of a Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and care for a resident receiving enteral tube feedings for one resident (Resident #6) reviewed for enteral tube feedings, resulting in the potential for aspiration pneumonia and an overall deterioration of health status. Findings: Resident #6 (R6): Review of an admission Record revealed R6 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dementia, diabetes, heart disease, and gastro-esophageal reflux. Review of R6's Care Plan revealed, (R6) needs the HOB (head of bed) elevated a minimum of 30 degrees during tube feeding and for 1 hour after. Date Initiated: 05/04/2022 . During an observation on 10/12/23 at 08:33 AM, R6 was in bed on her back with her tube feeding running. The head of R6's bed was at 22 degrees. During an observation on 10/12/23 at 11:54 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) V and CNA U were providing incontinence care to R6. The head of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility 1) Failed to implement an effective and current system of surveillance of staff illnesses to identify possible communicable diseases and infections to prevent the spread of an illness/outbreak, 2) Failed to perform incontinence care using infection control practices, and 3) Failed to ensure that staff were educated on and wore the appropriate recommended Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for residents. This deficient practice placed all residents residing in the facility at risk for the potential for the development and spread of disease and infection and the potential for an outbreak to go undetected. Findings: Employee Surveillance: Review of the Employee Infection Surveillance log revealed the following boxes to complete for each employee illness: Employee Name, Department, Facility Area Last Worked, Date of Call-in, Symptoms, When did symptoms start, Symptoms for how long, Seen by MD/NP/PA, Expected to return to work,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to implement, and operationalize an antibiotic stewardship program and 2) Failed to ensure accurate monitoring and documentation of an antibiotic for three residents (Resident #13, Resident #19, Resident #30) reviewed for antibiotic use, resulting in the potential for inappropriate antibiotic utilization and the potential for antibiotic resistance. Findings: Resident #13 (R13): Review of an admission Record revealed R13 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: osteomyelitis (bone infection) in the sacral wound, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. R13 was a full code (all resuscitation procedures to be provided to keep the person alive in the case of a medical emergency). Review of R13's Physician Progress Notes dated 9/29/23 revealed, .UA (urinalysis) is ordered. Patient is asymptomatic, just as precaution. Review of R13's Nurses Progress Note dated 9/29/23 revealed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to treat one resident (Resident #14) with dignity during care resulting in the potential for diminished feelings of self-worth. Findings include: Resident #14 (R14): Review of an admission Record revealed R14 was a [AGE] year old female, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnosis of morbid obesity, dementia, and anxiety disorder. R14 was completely dependent on staff for all hygiene needs. During an observation on 10/11/23 at 1:52 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) V provided peri care to R14 following urination and a bowel movement. While R14 laid on her right side, CNA V attempted to pull the brief out from under R14 and noted the under pad was soaked with urine. CNA V advised R14 that a new under pad was needed and left the room to obtain the new linen. R14 laid uncovered from the chest down while CNA V was out of the room. CNA V returned to the room with a new under pad and continued to clean R14. CNA V looked for and could not locate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that residents received complete and comprehensive wound assessments and 2) Failed to ensure the effectiveness of treatments and interventions based on wound assessments for one resident (Resident #13), reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the lack of assessment, monitoring, documentation, and the potential for the worsening of a wound and a delay in treatment. Findings: Resident #13 (R13): Review of an admission Record revealed R13 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: osteomyelitis (bone infection) in the sacral wound, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. R13 was a full code (all resuscitation procedures to be provided to keep the person alive in the case of a medical emergency). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R13, with a reference date of 7/29/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, out of a total possible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document administration of controlled substances for three residents (Resident #13, Resident #22, and Resident #11) resulting in the potential for overdose and/or ineffective management of pain, and the potential for drug diversion of controlled substances. Findings: Resident #13 (R13): Review of an admission Record revealed R13 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: heart disease, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of R13's Physician Order dated 8/23/23 revealed, Norco Oral Tablet 5-325 MG (milligram) (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for pain (to be administered at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM) and Norco Oral Tablet 5-325 MG (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain. Review of R13's Pharmacy Controlled Substance Proof-of-Use Record revealed the following: *On 10/9/23 1 tab of Norco 5/325…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$41,898 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $32,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $9,311 — penalty dated 2023-09-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PATEL, AMEEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/13/2015
HAUN, ROBERTIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/13/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$300K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 5%Other / private 95%

This home reported $300K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$342per resident / day
operating cost
$10,401per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$345per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235641. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next