Villa at Pine Place
4800 Clintonville Rd, Clarkston, MI 48346 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (248) 674-0903 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $179,680 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.6% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.1% | 12.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 43.4% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.3% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.2% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.5% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.5%CMS range 26.6–55.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.0–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 79.8 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #2571092. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall out of bed for one Resident (R8) of five resident reviewed for falls, resulting in actual harm for R8, who sustained a femur fracture. Findings include: Review of a complaint received by the State Agency on 7/24/25 revealed an allegation that R8 fell out of bed while they were cleaned by nursing staff and rolled over onto the floor. The complaint alleged R8 had one person assisting them and said they were supposed to have two-person assistance. The concern further revealed that R8 was hospitalized and subsequently treated for a fractured right hip. Review of R8's investigation file, related to R8's fall with major injury on 7/23/25, revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) AA was providing a bed bath (care) to R8 and rolled them on their side, and R8 continued to roll out of bed directly onto the floor. R8 was found to have two skin tears on their right knee, and complained of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00152863. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess a sacral/coccyx wound, implement adequate and appropriate interventions to prevent wound development, failed to timely identify the decline of a sacral/coccyx wound and notify the Physician for one (R202) of two residents reviewed for pressure wounds, which resulted in hospitalization for an infected wound, sepsis and a Stage 4 Pressure wound (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer) to the sacral/coccyx. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns regarding R202's pressure wounds. A review of the medical record revealed R202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: dementia, gastrostomy (opening in the stomach for the insertion of a feeding tube), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and was dependent on staff for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00143695. Based on record review and interviews facility failed to timely identify and address the nutritional needs; and monitor weights for one (R907) of two residents reviewed for nutrition and weight loss. This deficient practice for a resident admitted with higher risk resulted in decreased intake, significant undetected weight loss, and overall decline in the status. Findings include: R907 A record review revealed R907 was admitted to the facility for a short-term stay, after hospitalization on 2/23/24. R907's admitting diagnoses included respiratory failure, pneumonia, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R907 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. R907 was living independently in the community prior to admission to hospital on 2/10/24 with acute respiratory failure and congestive heart failure. R907 was discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00140321. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to timely provide medical care and ensure a timely transfer to the hospital for a resident identified with a change of condition (R84) and failed to ensure monitoring of oxygen saturation levels for (R81), two residents of two residents reviewed for a change of condition, resulting in the delayed treatment of a resident (R84) with identified acute changes who was later transferred to the hospital, intubated, and admitted into the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Findings include: R84 Review of the medical record documented R84 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, systemic lupus, dysphagia, and dementia. Review of a Nurse Practitioner (NP) consultation dated 9/20/23, documented in part . Patient was seen today per facility request. Nursing staff reports patient has had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00140321. This citation contains two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS #1 Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly transferred via wheelchair (R84) and ensure the required assistance level for bed mobility was provided to prevent a fall (R17), two of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in the resident to have verbalized pain, and ultimately resulting in an identified acute nondisplaced fracture at the proximal tibial meta diaphysis (R84). Findings include: R84 Review of Physical Therapist (PT) statement documented in part . 9-11-23 . Approx. 2:00 PM came upon (R84's name) in hallway in her w/c (wheelchair). She was leaning significantly to her left with her trunk off side of w/c. As I adjusted her upright she winced and had tears in her eyes. She c/o (complained of) pain in her R (right) knee. Attempted gentle ROM (Range of Motion) R knee (with) noted (increased) pain. Asked her what happened, and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3006555 and 3009286. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for one resident (R802) of two residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment.Findings include:On 5/13/26 a facility reported incident (FRI) that was submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R802 was victim of verbal abuse by a facility staff member on 4/27/26.On 5/13/26 the medical record for R802 was reviewed and revealed the following: R802 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia, Morbid obesity and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of R802's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/11/26 revealed R802 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R802's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition.On 5/13/26 at approximately 9:57 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and hand hygiene for two residents (R#'s 58 and 65) of seven residents reviewed for infection control as well as ensure appropriate infection control practices in the facility laundry and with regards to staff fingernails. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: R58 Review of the clinical record revealed R58 was admitted into the facility on 7/8/25, discharged [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute gastric ulcer with perforation, pleural effusion, generalized acute peritonitis, atelectasis, extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, fistula of intestine, candidal stomatitis, urinary tract infection, herpesviral cingivostomatitis (viral infection) and pharyngotonsillitis (an acute infection of the pharynx), acute peptic ulcer site unspecified with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #1233191.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment in a dignified manner for five residents, (R20, R24, R43, R70, and R76) of six residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include:R#'s 24, 43, 70, and 20. On 8/19/25 at 9:39 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 'M' was observed in R24's room providing one-to one feeding assistance. CNA 'M' was not observed to be seated while feeding R24, rather they were observed standing at the bedside over the resident while providing assistance. On 8/19/25 at 12:27 PM, R20 R43, and R70 were observed seated in the dining room at a table. CNA 'M' was observed to be standing at the table providing one-to-one feeding assistance alternating bites of food between R20 and R70. On 8/19/25 at 12:35 PM CNA 'M' was observed providing one-to-one feeding assistance to R20. Several times throughout the meal, CNA 'M' left the table in the middle of the meal to assist the other residents and returned to provide one-to-one feeding assistance to R20. On 8/19/25 at 12:40 PM, CNA 'M' is again…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for multiple residents, including R60. Findings include:Observations made during the recertification survey from 8/19/25 - 8/21/25 revealed concerns with flies observed in several resident rooms and throughout the hallways.Observations of the residents that attended smoking activities revealed the doors to the courtyard were kept open to allow the residents to exit the facility.On 8/19/25 at 9:58 AM, R60 was observed lying in bed with oxygen in place via nasal cannula. There was a small black portable fan on their table next to the bed that had a large build-up of dust that hung down off the front and back of the protective outer covering and fan blades. When asked about their room environment and if they had any concerns, R60 reported, I have such allergies and they don't clean that (black fan). R60 reported housekeeping swept and mopped the floors, but didn't dust.Additional observations on 8/19/25 and 8/20/25 revealed the fan remained with a heavy accumulation of dust.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff from handling resident's money (cash and cards) to purchase smoking materials for 18 (6, 11, 14, 16, 26, 29, 30, 31, 37, 40, 42, 45, 47, 50, 55, 63, 64, and 67) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for exploitation and misappropriation of the resident's property. Findings include:On 8/19/25 at 12:20 PM, a staff member (Driver/Certified Nursing Assistant - Staff 'P') was observed entering the main dining room with a gray plastic bag. Staff 'P' was then observed going up to a resident and placed a debit/credit card down on the table next to R37, then proceeded to go around to several other residents while they were eating their lunch. Staff 'P' was then observed to pull out a large wad of folded cash and then showed another resident a carton of cigarettes.On 8/19/25 at 12:26 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff 'P' upon exiting the main dining room. Staff 'P' reported they worked as the facility's driver and had been employed since February 28, 2025. When asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for four residents (R1, R24, R43, and R70) of 10 residents reviewed for dining/nutrition. Finding include R1 On 08/20/2025 at approximately 1:20 p.m., a meal tray was observed for meal service for R1 which included R1's meal preference ticket that revealed the following standing orders for their lunch meal: Standing Orders: 1. 1/2 cup of applesauce (as available). 2. 1/2 cup mashed potatoes & gravy. 3. Yogurt, Yogurt At that time, R1's lunch meal tray was observed to not contain any of the standing order items that were supposed to be provided on the meal ticket. On 8/8/25 at approximately 1:25 p.m., The Dietary Manger J (DM J) was queried regarding the dietary process for ensuring the standing orders indicated on the meal tickets are provided to the residents when the meal is served. DM J reported that the process occurs in the kitchen during the tray pass in which one of the dietary aides is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen and during food service for one resident (R70) and all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 8/20/2025 at approximately 8:37 a.m., a tour of the main kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager J and the following was observed: 1. A box of Taquitos was not secured/unsealed and when moved on the shelf, the individual taquitos fell out of the box. 2. The storage rack that keeps the metal pans was observed to contain stacks of pans that were not air dried and contained water droplets up and down the stack of pans. When the pans were raised, water poured out on the floor. 3. The kitchen light covers had dust and staining on them. 4. The ventilation covers had dust/debris spreading out from them onto the ceiling tiles. On 8/20/25 at approximately 9:01 a.m., Dietary Manager J was queried regarding the nesting process for the stacking of their metal pans, and they indicated that the pans should have been air dried before being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #1233191.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's right to be treated with dignity and respect for one (R49) of six residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in facility staff searching a resident's personal possessions without giving the resident the opportunity to decline, in absence of concern with illegal substances, and implementing smoking suspension for three days. Findings include:On 8/19/25 at 9:35 AM, an interview was conducted with R49. When asked about the facility's smoking practices, R49 reported they smoked cigarettes and had to maintain their smoking materials with staff but further reported they were one of the residents that could smoke independently.Review of the clinical record revealed R49 was admitted into the facility on 7/1/22 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: alcoholic hepatic failure without coma, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, gout, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pull cord for the overbed light was accessible to the resident for one (R60) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include:On 8/19/25 at 9:58 AM, R60 was observed lying in bed with oxygen in place via nasal cannula. The overbed light on the wall above their bed was observed to have a pull string that was tied up and hung down approximately one foot and was not able to be reached when in bed. They reported they rarely left their room and preferred to stay in bed. When asked about their room environment and if they had any concerns, R60 discussed several concerns including the light above their bed. When asked to explain further, R60 stated, I can't reach my light to turn on cause they never brought me a longer cord.Additional observations on 8/20/25 and 8/21/25 revealed the cord remained tied up and not within reach.On 8/20/25 at 1:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director (Staff 'O') who reported they had worked at the facility for about 30 years. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident privacy for one (R25) of two resident reviewed for privacy. Findings include:On 8/19/25 at 9:27 AM, R25 was observed lying in her bed which had a concave mattress (mattress with raised edges). R25 did not answer any questions asked. R25's bed was positioned to the left side directly against the wall to the hallway. The bed extended approximately 6 inches past the doorframe to the room. Upon attempting to close the door to R25's room, the door would hit the footboard of R25's bed and was not able to close. Review of the clinical record revealed R25 was admitted into the facility on 6/27/25 with diagnoses that included: dementia, diabetes and fracture of the left wrist and hand. According to a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam dated 8/6/25, R25 had severely impaired cognition.On 8/20/25 at 9:20 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F was interviewed and asked how staff closed R25's door as the bed extended past the doorframe. CNA F explained that was a bed Hospice had brought, it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect, for one Resident (R10) of two residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in R10 being transferred from their wheelchair with a damaged Hoyer lift sling, hitting their head and causing pain, with the potential to affect 15 additional facility residents who used Hoyer lifts for transfers. Findings include: On 8/19/25 at 11:32 a.m., R10 was observed seated in their manual wheelchair, dressed and well-groomed, propelling their wheelchair around their room. Review of R10's nursing progress note, dated 8/19/25 at 3:29 p.m., revealed R10 had a fall out of the Hoyer lift. The note described, (R10) was in the room with two aides with Hoyer. (R10) was getting put to bed and was hooked up to the Hoyer and upon lifting (R10) was not positioned correctly and sling come loose (sic). (R10) hit head on (the) baseboard of bed when being lowered back to a sitting position in wheelchair. Review of R10's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for one (R60) of one resident reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence. Findings include:On 8/19/25 at 9:58 AM, R60 was observed lying in bed with oxygen running via nasal cannula. When asked about how they felt the care was and whether there was enough staff to meet their care needs, R60 reported concerns with not having enough staff to change their briefs regularly. The resident further reported they wore disposable briefs and they also had a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) and still has burning (common pain from a UTI) because they felt like the UTI was because they weren't getting changed frequently. When asked what they considered as frequent, R60 reported they were trying to get a change every three to four hours, but they often had to wait a long time. When asked when the last time they were changed, R60 reported the last time was at 5:00 AM. The resident also reported it (the delay in being changed) was worse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide snacks for a resident with low body weight for one (R54) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 8/19/25 at 9:06 AM, R54 was observed lying in her bed. R54 appeared to be small and very thin and bilateral arm and hand contractures were observed. R54 was asked about care at the facility. R54 explained she did not get snacks in the evenings, she did not always like the food being served and she was hungry in the evenings and would like to get snacks. sometimes someone would give her something, but she needed assistance to eat and it was hard to get someone to assist her at snack time.Review of the clinical record revealed R54 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition and anxiety disorder. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R54 was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 9/9/24 at 8:50 AM, there were 2 10-pound packages of raw ground beef thawing under running water in the 2 compartment sink. The ground beef logs were in a metal pan, with approximately 1/3 of the meat submerged in water, and the rest of the meat was sticking out of the pan. The temperature of the running water was measured to be 92 degrees Fahrenheit. On 9/9/24 at 9:15 AM, Dietary Manager B was queried about the temperature of the running water when thawing meat, and stated that the water should have been cold. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.13 Thawing, Except as specified in (D) of this section, POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS FOOD (TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD) shall be thawed: 1. (A) Under refrigeration that maintains the FOOD temperature at 5°C (41°F) or less; or 2. (B) Completely submerged under running water: 1. (1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent, meaningful and person-centered activities for one (R32) of one resident reviewed for activities, and five of seven residents who attended the confidential Resident Council interview, resulting in potential for loss of interaction, joy, self-esteem, sense of well-being, creativity, and independence. Findings include: R32 A review of R32's clinical record revealed R32 was a long-term resident of the facility and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R32's admitting diagnoses included anxiety disorder, bipolar-disorder, insomnia, osteoarthritis, social phobia and depression. Based on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R32 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. On 9/9/24 at approximately 12:15 PM, R32 was observed in their bed. R32 was queried about their daily routine, if they attended any activities and their quality of life at the facility. R32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00146644 and MI00146449. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure liquids were provided according to their prescribed therapeutic diet texture for one resident (R57) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: On 9/9/24 at approximately 9:03 a.m., R57 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair attempting to eat their breakfast. R57 was observed to be coughing while eating cereal and drinking their juice. Both the milk and juice appeared to be thin. A review of R57's meal ticket revealed they were supposed to have been provided nectar thick liquids for their meals. On 9/9/24 at approximately 9:07 a.m., Nurse C was informed that R57 was coughing while drinking their juice and eating their cereal. Nurse C was observed going into R57's room and assessing them and indicated that their liquids including the milk and the juice were not thickened and they indicated that R57 should have thickened liquids and was then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide the total amount of physician ordered enteral (tube) feeding, document consistently and accurately the amount of enteral feeding infused, and ensure timely follow up with the physician for one (R63) of one resident reviewed for enteral feeding. Findings include: R63 was a long-term resident of the facility. R63 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R63 was recently hospitalized and readmitted back to the facility on 8/31/24. R63's diagnoses included stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis of one side), malnutrition, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R63 received part of their nutrition via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG Tube - A tube surgically placed directly on the stomach to receive nutrition and hydration). Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R63 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. R63 had a family member appointed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00146644. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer pain medication for one resident (R273) of three residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: On 9/9/24, a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed and alleged R273 was not administered pain medication per physicians orders. On 9/10/24 the medical record for R273 was reviewed and revealed the following: R273 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Mild Protein-Calorie malnutrition and Multiple Sclerosis. A review of R273's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/17/24 revealed R273 needed assistance from facility staff with their activities of daily living. R273 BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was 13 indicating intact cognition. A review of R273's careplan revealed the following: Focus-I have a terminal illness, and I am at the end of life receiving Hospice services through [name of hospice]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review facility failed to consistently assess a resident after dialysis; and maintain accessible communication/collaboration between the dialysis center and the facility for one (R4) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: Review of R4's clinical record revealed R4 was a long-term resident of the facility. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4's admitting diagnoses included end stage renal failure and aphasia (inability to speak/comprehend). Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R4 had a Brief interview for Mental Assessment (BIMS) assessment score of 00/15, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Review of R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a physician order dated 5/22/24 that read In-house dialysis 4 times/week. Further review of records revealed that R4 had been going out for dialysis on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday. Further review of physician orders reveals an order dated 6/13/24 that read, monitor dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review facility failed to provide sufficient staff to provide adequate care and services for residents on the weekends for three of seven residents who attended the Resident Council interview who wished to remain anonymous, resulting in extended call light response and resident dissatisfaction. This deficient practice had the ability to affect multiple residents that resided in the facility. Findings include: A confidential Resident Council interview was completed on 9/10/24 at 10:30 AM. During the interview one resident who wished to remain anonymous reported that they had to wait longer to get assistance after activating their call light on weekends. Two residents who wished to remain anonymous agreed when the concern was brought up and reported longer wait times during the afternoon and midnight shifts. One resident reported that their toilet broke over a weekend and they did not have anyone to fix it. They had a hard time getting assistance to assist them with their toileting as they did not have enough help. Two residents reported they have one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R12 On 9/11/24 The medical record for R12 was reviewed and revealed the following: R12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Schizoaffective disorder, Bipolar disorder and Anxiety disorder. A Physicians order dated 8/28/24 revealed the following: diazePAM Oral Tablet 2 MG (Diazepam) Give 1 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety for 14 Days. A review of the EMAR progress notes (electronic medication administration record) for August and September 2024 revealed the following dates of R12's diazepam administration in which no documented non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administration: 9/11, 9/10 (7:45 PM), 9/10 (10:19 AM), 9/9 (4:59 PM), 9/9 (9:36 AM), 9/8 (8:24 PM), 9/8 (6:12 PM), 9/8 (8:14 AM), 9/7 (12:13 PM), 9/6, 9/3, and 9/2/24. On 9/11/24 at approximately 1:10 p.m., during a follow-up conversation with the DON, the DON was queried regarding the lack of documentation of non-pharmacological interventions being attempted prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00146644 and MI00146449. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were applied for one residents (R12) of two residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers . Findings include: On 9/9/24 a concern submitted to the State Agency for review indicated the facility staff were not following infection control procedures. On 9/9/24 at approximately 9:52 a.m., R12 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R12 was queried about having any open pressure ulcers/wounds and they indicated they had multiple open wounds on their heel and leg. At that time, R12's room was observed with no signage that indicated staff should be utilizing enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when providing care to R12. On 9/10/24 at approximately 1:52 p.m., Nurse C was observed in R12's room providing treatment to their wound without a gown on. On 9/10/24 at approximately 2:03 p.m., Nurse C was queried regarding PPE (personal protective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to operationalize an antibiotic stewardship program which consistently ensured appropriate clinical indication for use of antibiotic medications for three (R4,R8 and R63) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship program, resulting in the potential for increased antibiotic resistance. Findings include: On 9/11/24 at 10:30 AM an overview of the facility's infection control program was discussed with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the facility's Unit Manager(UM). And asked what was their process. The UM stated she makes sure the infection meets Mcgeers (a system that identifies if signs and symptoms meet the criteria of an infection and qualifies for an antibiotic) then placed the infection in the book. If it does not meet criteria, they would reach out to the provider and let them know that the criteria is not met (to discontinue the medication) and then do a line listing and mapping. The UM was then asked if these conversations were documented somewhere and if the provider declined to discontinue the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00145010 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe admission orders and follow up timely for one (R504) of two Residents reviewed for admission orders, resulting in R504 missing four days of their medications, including their blood thinner, diabetic, blood pressure and Gout medications. Findings include: R504 A record review revealed that R504 was a long-term resident of the facility. They were originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R504 had multiple hospitalizations during their stay at the facility. R504 was recently admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and they were readmitted back to the facility on 4/1/24. R504's diagnoses included respiratory failure, seizures, cerebral palsy with quadriparesis (weakness and decreased mobility of all four limbs), failure to thrive, and wound infection. Based on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R504 had severe cognitive impairment. R504 were dependent on staff assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake# MI00144079 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete a full investigation following an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse pertaining to two residents (R701 and R706 ) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R701 was sexually abused by R706 who entered into their room on or about 4/14/24 and stuck their hand under the resident's covers and started to rub their thigh near their private/vaginal area. On 4/24/24 at approximately 8:50 AM, R701 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. R701 was queried as to life in the facility, including safety and abuse, R701 noted that they did not always feel safe and had issues with other residents and staff. They stated that a male resident that resided in the room across from them had entered into their room about a week ago. They noted that it was in the later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00144079. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address history of drug use for one (R702) of two reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency alleged R702 overdosed on drugs in the facility on 3/30/2024. On 4/24/24 at 10:25 AM, R702 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway, conversing with other residents. No signs of alcohol or drug use observed. R702 was cooperative and answered questions appropriately. When queried about recent hospitalization (on 3/30/2024) R702 stated that he had pneumonia and couldn't breathe. When queried about any drug use R702 reported that he had left the facility earlier that day and had smoked weed but denied any further drug use, adding that was only possible if there was something in the weed he had smoked. On 4/24/24 at 1:04 PM the director of nursing (DON) was queried about the events that occurred prior to R702 going out to the hospital on 3/30/24. The DON stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00144079 and MI00144102. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an elopement of one (R704) of residents reviewed for accidents/supervision, resulting in R704 exiting the facility's front door and gone for four and a half hours without staff being aware. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency alleged R704 walked out of the building without staff knowing and was not found for four and a half hours. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) reported to the State Agency documented R704 exited the facility without the staff's knowledge on 4/19/24. On 4/24/24 at 9:56 AM, R704 was observed walking throughout the hallways pushing a four wheeled walker with a seat. The resident agreed to return to their room for an interview. When asked to recall the events from last Friday (4/19/24) and being outside, R704 pointed to their right arm (the wanderguard bracelet) and stated, I got branded. R704 further reported, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00144079 and MI00144102. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medically-related social services and follow up to address guardianship, patient advocacy, and care planning reviews for one (R704) of one residents reviewed for social services. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency alleged R704 walked out of the building without staff knowing and was not found for four and a half hours. Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) reported to the State Agency documented R704 exited the facility without the staff's knowledge on 4/19/24. According to the facility's Social Services Manager job description dated 9/2023: .Assess and Evaluate Each Resident's Psychosocial Needs and Develop Goals for Providing the Necessary Service and Take Part in admission Process as Needed .Incorporate the Social Service Goals in the Resident's Plan of Care and Attend Care Planning Conferences .Ensure completion of any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00142974 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive infection control program that consistently identified infections based on symptoms and justified the use of antibiotics, (using McGeer's Criteria for the definition of infections), as well as calculated infection rates, demonstrated on-going tracking, trending, in-services, education, and environmental rounding. resulting in the R902 developing a change of condition resulting in hospitalization related to a Urinary Tract Infection. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency revealed that R902 developed Urinary Tract Infection at the facility and they were transferred to the hospital on 2/20/24 after a family member had identified the change in R902's condition and they were admitted to the hospital. On 4/2/24 at approximately 12:30 PM,a verbal request was made to the facility administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) to meet with the facility's infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00143570 Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to follow-up and resolve a grievance timely for one (R901) of one Resident reviewed for grievances resulting in feelings of frustration. Findings include: A record review revealed R901 was a long-term resident of the facility, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R901's admitting diagnoses included congestive heart failure, metabolic encephalopathy, and breast cancer. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R901 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15, indicative of intact cognition. R901 was dependent on staff assistance with their mobility in bed and toileting hygiene. A complaint received by the State Agency dated 3/25/24 revealed that R901 waited for an extended period to get changed when they had requested for staff assistance on a specific date. An initial observation was completed on 4/2/24, at approximately 11:30 AM. R901 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake# MI00142589 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure routine scheduled bathing and facial hair removal was provided for two (R702 and R703) out of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged residents were not receiving timely grooming services. R702 On 2/20/24 at approximately 11:03 AM, R702 was observed lying in bed wearing a hospital gown. The resident had extremely long facial hair on their chin and around their cheeks. Their hair appeared greasy and unkempt. The resident was alert and asked whether they received scheduled showers and if they needed assistance removing facial hairs. R702 responded that they did not know the last time they had a shower and would like their facial hair to be shaved. On 2/20/24 at approximately 1:10 PM, a second observation of R702 was made. The resident's family member was also in the room. R702's facial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00141561. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure freedom from experiencing and overhearing verbal abuse for two residents (R#'s 704 and 706) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 1/3/24 at 10:40 AM, an interview was conducted with R704 and they were asked if any staff members had ever said anything inappropriate to them. R704 said about three weeks ago on the night shift CNA 'A' exited their room after providing care to them and overheard CNA 'A' call them a , fat bch. R704 further said the facility terminated CNA 'A's employment. On 1/3/24 at 10:45 AM, an interview was conducted with R706. They were asked if they heard CNA 'A' make the statement and said they did hear the remark. A review of R704 and R706's most recent Minimum Data Set assessments was conducted and revealed both residents had intact cognition. On 1/3/24 at 11:15 AM, a review of the facility provided investigation folder for the incident between R704 and CNA 'A' was conducted. The folder contained a typed document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 10/30/23 between 7:25 AM-8:00 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was an opened, undated 1 gallon container of ranch dressing. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17: Ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less for a maximum of 7 days. Refrigerated, ready-to- eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and packed by a food processing plant shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment and if the food is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice #1 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a comprehensive infection control program that identified resident infections, calculated monthly infection rates, tracked and trended infections, utilized laboratory and pharmaceutical data, and ensured departmental surveillance and staff education on infection control. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 5/2023 documented: .The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and practices .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .Surveillance .designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a consultant to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently ensure the physicians review, action and rationale of identified medication irregularities documented by the Pharmacy monthly medication reviews were documented and maintained in the resident's medical record for four residents (R17, R25, R36 and R41) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R25 On 10/30/23 the medical record for R25 was reviewed and revealed the following: R25 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including: Schizophrenia, Multiple Sclerosis and Epilepsy. A review of R25's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/20/23 revealed R25 needed supervision from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R25's BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) was 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. A review of the monthly medication regimen reviewed for R25 revealed the following dates in which irregularities were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents prescribed psychotropic medication had adequate indication for use of duplicate antidepressants, clinical rationale to support continued use, as well as PRN (as needed) orders, identify and monitor resident specific behaviors and approaches, and document non-pharmacological approaches and behavior details at the time of medication administration for two (R17 and R36) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, resulting in unnecessary use of psychotropic medication, and inability to monitor the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment due to lack of documented supporting evidence. Findings include: R17 Review of the clinical record revealed R17 was admitted into the facility on 5/31/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, anxiety disorder, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with major depressive-like episode, bipolar disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two medication carts were secured while unattended and ensure medications were properly stored and secured, resulting in the potential for unauthorized entry into the carts, misuse, contamination and diversion. This deficient practice had the potential to affect multiple residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/30/23 at approximately 6:15 AM, a medication cart located on the 200 hall was observed to be open/unlocked and unattended by any Nursing staff. A second treatment cart located on the 300-hall containing various creams and supplies was also noted to be unlocked. An interview was conducted with Nurse X on 10/30/23 at approximately 6:30 AM. Nurse 'X was asked about the facility's policy/protocol for medication/treatment carts. Nurse X noted that they should be locked when unattended. On 10/30/23 at approximately 8:14 AM and on 10/31/23 at approximately 8:50 AM, a COVID 19 reagent bottle was observed on top of the sharp container located in a resident's room. On 10/31/23 at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (R10) of two residents reviewed for medication were assessed for the safe self-administration of medication and to have medication kept at bedside. Findings include: On 10/30/23 at approximately 8:14 AM, R10 was observed lying in bed. On the bedside table was a container of eye drops and a scripted container of saline nasal spray. A bottle of COVID-19 reagent was observed on top of the sharp box on the resident's wall. When asked about the medication, R10 reported that he uses the medication daily. On 10/31/23 at approximately 8:44 AM, the same medication was observed on the table. On 10/31/23 at approximately 8:46 AM, an interview and record review were conducted with Nurse K regarding the self-administration of medication. Nurse K reported that residents, including R10, needed an order to self-administer medication. Nurse K looked through R10's clinical record and noted that they could not locate an order. On 10/31/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure healthcare treatment decisions were properly documented for one (R17) of five reviewed for advanced directives/code status. Findings include: A review of R17's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: congestive heart failure, type II diabetes and neoplasm of right breast. Review of R17's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 (cognitively intact cognition). At the top of the resident's electronic face sheet was a Code Status section that read: Full Code, DNR (do-not-resuscitate). An order dated 9/29/23 for a DNR was located in R17's clinical record. On 11/1/23 at approximately 10:54 AM, R17 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. When asked their code status wishes, R17 reported that they are DNR. On 11/1/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to consistently notify the resident's legal guardian of refusals of their medications for one (R5) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. Findings include: On 10/30/23 at 7:09 AM, R5 was observed sitting in their wheelchair at the end of the hallway facing the nurse's station. An interview was attempted however could not be conducted due to the resident's cognition level. On 10/30/23 at 9:05 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with R5's legal guardian. When asked if they had any concerns regarding R5's care at the facility the legal guardian began to explain that it came to their attention that R5 was missing some of their medications because R5 has been refusing them. R5 stated the problem is that R5 is not competent to make those decisions due to R5 having the capacity of a child. R5's legal guardian stated in part . I am his legal guardian. I should be notified if he refuses to take his medications . The legal guardian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an effective program to initiate and resolve grievances for one (R67) of three reviewed for dignity/respect. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at approximately 11:30 AM, R67 reported that the facility was not addressing their grievances. The resident reported that they were positive with COVID-19 in the middle of October 2023 and placed on precautions. During that time a Nurse (herein after Nurse R) referred to them as Ms. Covid and it hurt their feelings and they felt they should be addressed by their actual name. R67 further noted that Nurse R never apologized. R67 also noted that they filed a second grievance that noted Nurse R allowed CNA (certified nursing assistant) S to pass their medication(s) that included a narcotic. R67 stated that they felt it was very unprofessional. The facility was asked to provide all grievances/incident-accident (IA) reports since the resident's admission to the facility. Two grievance forms were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order with medical symptom justification for the use of a physical restraint and specify the times to be used while in bed per plan of care for one (R36) of two residents reviewed for physical restraints. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Bed Rails dated 6/2023: .Full and half bed rails will be safely used only as needed to treat a resident's medical symptoms .Obtain a Physician order that contains statements and determinations regarding medical symptoms and is specific to the circumstances under which bed rails are to be used and time limit for use . On 10/30/23 at 8:20 AM, R36 was observed laying in a bariatric bed with bilateral metal half side rails. When asked about the use of the side rails, R36 reported they used those to help reposition themselves in bed. R36 further reported they preferred to spend most of their time in bed. When asked if the could recall whether the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Nursing practices were followed for two residents (R25 and R50) of two residents reviewed for Nursing standards of practice when facility Nursing staff did not timely transcribe a Physician order for R25 and failed to ensure medications were reordered and available for administration for R50. Findings include: R50 On 10/30/23 at approximately 9:01 a.m., R50 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R50 was queried if they had any concerns and they reported the facility had run out of their Prozac (anti-depressant) and Norco (pain medication) and their Ativan (anti-anxiety). R50 reported they had missed multiple days of their medications. On 10/30/23 the medical record for R50 was reviewed and revealed the following: R50 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Generalized anxiety disorder and Major depressive disorder-recurrent. A review of R50's MDS (minimum data set) with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00140514. Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure accurate and complete discharge instructions were provided to one resident upon discharge (R80) of one residents reviewed for discharge planning. Findings include: On 10/30/23, review of a concern submitted to the State Agency alleged R80 was not provided with appropriate discharge instructions for follow up medical appointments and was not assisted with discharge planning. On 10/30/23 the medical record for R80 was reviewed and revealed the following: R80 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/27/23. R80 had diagnoses including Acute kidney failure, Chronic kidney disease (stage 4-severe) and alcohol dependence. A review of R80's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/15/23 revealed R80 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R80's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was 15 indicating intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure restorative range of motion (ROM) services and hand splints were applied for two (R17 and R41) out of three residents reviewed for limited ROM/Positioning. Findings include: R17 On 10/30/23 at approximately 11:13 AM, R17 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. When asked about care in the facility the resident reported that they came to the facility in May 2023 to obtain physical therapy. When their physical therapy was cut they reported that they asked for restorative therapy and was told the facility does not offer that type of care. R17 stated that they were depressed as they were hoping to get more care so that they could return home. A review of R17's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: congestive heart failure, type II diabetes neoplasm of right breast. Review of R17's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper management of tube feeding, including labeling on the formula to ensure appropriate administration in accordance with physician orders for one resident (R21) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in the potential for inaccurate tube feeding administration. Findings include: On 10/30/23 at 7:14 AM, R21 was observed in their bedroom watching TV with their head of bed elevated. The tube feeding was infusing and the label was observed with a date of 10/29/23 at 3:00 AM with no rate documented and the water bag (auto flush) was dated for 10/28/23 at 9:00 PM. On 10/30/23 at 7:30 AM, Nurse J (the assigned midnight nurse) was interviewed and asked how often is tube feeding tubing changed? Nurse J replied every 24 hours, but I don't know. I am agency nurse so I am not sure of facility rules. Record review revealed that R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Dysphagia, Contracture of muscles and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to consistently coordinate and provide breakfast meals for one resident (R44) of one reviewed for dialysis, resulting in frustration and hunger. Findings include: On 10/30/23 at 7:06 AM, R44 was observed laying on their back in bed watching a show on their laptop. When asked if they had any concerns regarding their care at the facility, R44 began to explain how frustrated they were that the facility would not ensure that they received their breakfast before their chair time at dialysis. R44 explained the dialysis was provided in the facility, however it is always a problem for the kitchen staff to provide them their breakfast before their chair time. R44 stated they go to dialysis on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. R44 stated they had to leave in a few minutes, and they haven't delivered me a tray. R44 stated how they are hungry on those days because the facility can't get it together. R44 stated there was a meeting with the kitchen staff manager who stated they would switch their breakfast meals to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate narcotic medication practices including: storage and destruction of narcotics, and administration and disposition discrepancies for controlled substances for one (R36) of two residents reviewed for controlled substances, and one resident who attended the confidential resident council interview, resulting unrelieved pain for residents that reported they weren't getting their controlled pain medication at times, and the potential for unidentified diversion of controlled substances. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Administration Procedures for All Medications dated 8/2020: .After administration, return to cart .and document administration in the MAR (medication administrative record) or TAR (treatment administrative record) and the controlled substance sign out record . According to the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substance Disposal dated 8/2020: .The Director of Nursing, in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent when two medication errors were observed from a total of 25 opportunities observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 8:25 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) M was observed preparing the morning medication administration for R22. RN M' was observed to have crushed the Carbamazepine 400 mg (milligram) ER (extended release) tablet and opened and crushed the contents of eight capsules of the Depakote Sprinkles 125 mg Delayed Release (DR) capsules. RN M was observed to have combined all of the crushed morning medications for R22 (which included the Carbamazepine ER & Depakote DR medications) and added vanilla pudding to the medication cup and was observed to have administered it to the resident at 8:34 AM. Review of the Carbamazepine ER manufacturer insert, documented in part . capsules may be swallowed whole or may be opened and all the beads sprinkled on a teaspoon of soft food such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, & record reviews the facility failed to ensure seizure medications were administered per the manufacturer instructions and physician orders for one (R22) of four residents reviewed for the medication administration observation, resulting in two significant medication errors. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 8:25 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) M was observed preparing the morning medication administration for R22. RN M' was observed to have crushed the Carbamazepine 400 mg (milligram) ER (extended release) tablet and opened and crushed the contents of eight capsules of the Depakote Sprinkles 125 mg Delayed Release (DR) capsules. RN M was observed to have combined all of the crushed morning medications for R22 (which included the Carbamazepine ER & Depakote DR medications) and added vanilla pudding to the medication cup and was observed to have administered it to the resident at 8:34 AM. Review of the medical record revealed R22 had a diagnosis of . Epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with complex partial seizures . Review of the physician orders revealed R22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed by staff during a COVID-19 outbreak. This deficient practice had the potential affect all 79 residents that resided at the facility. Findings include: Upon entry into the building on 8/16/23 at 8:30 AM it was reported by the Administrator that there were several residents throughout the building that had tested positive for COVID-19. The Administrator provided a list of 23 residents that had tested positive for COVID-19. The list noted residents with COVID-19 resided on the 100, 200 and 300 halls. On 8/16/23 at approximately 12:00 PM, observations were made on the 200 halls. At that time, five rooms on the hall that had residents noted on the COVID-19 list, had precaution signs on the doors that read, Contact Precautions Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room exit. Put on gown before room entry. Discard gown before room exit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake#MI00138688 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to inform a resident that their sleep/anxiety medication was discontinued, resulting in the resident not receiving medication for three days for one (R703) out of two residents reviewed for medication administration/quality of care. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged the facility had DC (discontinued) R703's medication they had been on for several months and did not provide the resident with notice. On 8/16/23 at approximately 2:00 PM, R703 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer all questions asked. The resident reported that they were admitted to the facility in April of 2022. They noted that they were their own responsible person and thus in charge of making all their own decisions. They continued to report that they received support from psychologists/psychiatrists as well as services from physicians. When queried as to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00136230 A complaint was received by the State Agency that alleged the resident sustained a fall. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wheelchair brakes were in working order for one resident (R704) of two residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall with sustainment of a hematoma to the forehead. Findings include: On 8/17/23 at 9:00 AM, R704 was observed in bed asleep. At that time, R704's wheelchair was observed to the right side of the bed. It was observed the wheelchair had an automatic breaking mechanism that when functioning properly applied the brakes when no weight was in the seat of the chair, and the brake disengaged when weight was applied to the seat in order to prevent the chair from rolling during a transfer into the chair. At that time, R704's automatic brake on the wheelchair was tested and it was discovered the left wheel was locked, however; the right wheel still had free travel causing the chair to swivel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$179,680 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $52,281 — penalty dated 2024-04-04
- $127,399 — penalty dated 2023-11-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-02 for 12 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-30 for 44 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235461. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.