Maple Lawn Medical Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 188 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 106.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent accidents for two residents (#2, #6) of three resident reviewed for accidents resulting in major injury (fracture and brain bleed) and hospitalization for resident #2.Findings Included: Resident #2 Review of the medical record demonstrated R2 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, repeated falls, constipation, psychotic disorder with delusion, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), vitamin D deficiency, chronic kidney disease, depression, gastro-esophageal reflux, osteoarthritis (arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the end of bones wears down), chronic pain, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood). Review of the medical record revealed a recent hospital leave on 06/30/2025 and a readmitted on [DATE] with new diagnoses that included displaced fracture of lateral end of left clavicle, intercranial injury, and fall on same level.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notice of discharges and transfers, to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.According to an email from the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, received on 8/22/25, the facility had not been sending notices for transfers and discharges and that they did not have any notices on record for 2024 or 2025.On 8/26/25 at 12:03 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked who is responsible for notifying the ombudsman of discharges and at 12:32 PM NHA reported that the ombudsman is emailed on a monthly basis either by herself or by the social worker. When asked to provide the monthly emails dating back to their last annual survey, NHA reported that they only had 2 on file. Those emails were provided and were dated 8/14/25 and 8/26/25.On 8/27/25 at 2:25 PM NHA was asked if the facility had a policy related to Ombudsman notification and at 2:36 PM NHA reported that they do not have a written policy regarding Ombudsman notification.On 8/27/25 at 2:39 PM, during an interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical rationale was documented by the provider for ongoing use of an as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medication beyond 14 days, for one resident (resident #6) of four residents reviewed.Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of that included Alzheimer's dementia. R6 's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD 5/24/25 reflected R6 had long and short-term memory impairment and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Further review of the clinical record reflected R6 was prescribed Ativan on 7/25/25 0.5 milligrams as needed three times a day for restlessness and anxiousness, a urinalysis was also ordered R6 on 7/25/25 and an anti-biotic was ordered on 7/26/25. Further review of the clinical record did not include rationale from the Physician/ provider for continued us of the PRN Ativan beyond 14 days of the mediation being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) for one resident (#91) of 15 resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) reviewed.Findings Included:Resident #91 (R91)Review of the medical record demonstrated R91 was admitted to the facility 01/31/2025 with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), gastroesophageal reflux, chronic pain, sacral pressure ulcer, osteoarthritis (arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the end of bones wears down), hyperkalemia (high level of potassium in blood), bradycardia (heart rate below 60 beats per minute), history of pace maker, and urinary retention. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/07/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Review of R91's medical record revealed that an Unstageable pressure wound to his coccyx had been identified on 07/10/2025. The most recent completed skin evaluation completed on 08/25/2025 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number MI00152699. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of three residents (Resident #2) was able to exercise resident rights and be treated with respect and dignity. Findings Included: Review of the facility documents revealed Resident #2 (R2) had resided at the facility since [DATE], and had a diagnosis of dementia and behavior disturbances. R2 was deceased at the time of the onsite investigation. Review of a facility investigation revealed that on [DATE] Medical Assistant (MA) C reported that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D entered R2's room while she was in the room to administer medications to R2. MA C reported that R2 was lying flat in bed when LPN D gave R2 a pill, and told R2 that was a new stomach pill that he needed to take. MAC further reported that LPN D used vulgar language and told R2 that he must swallow the pills. MA C reported that R2 told LPN D that she was killing him. The investigation concluded that R2 had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This survey pertains to intake MI00146629. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care approaches for one resident (Resident #1) with dementia of three reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #1 (R1) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/17/24, reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) should not be completed, as R1 was rarely/never understood. The same MDS reflected R1 had short-term and long-term memory impairments and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. On 9/5/24 at 12:08 PM, R1 was observed seated in her room, in a Broda chair (specialty chair). A staff member was observed to propel R1 to the dining room, while seated in the Broda chair. A hoyer (mechanical lift) lift sling was observed beneath R1. She was wearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate infection surveillance for all residents (100 current residents) and take appropriate actions to track, trend, and formulate corrective actions to decrease the spread of nosocomial infections in the facility. Findings Included: During an interview on 08/15/2025 at 09:32 a.m. Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) C explained that he had been in his current position since February of 2024 and was responsible for the data collection and review of information regarding infections in the facility. ICP C explained that he reviewed the data and would identify trends that potentially required interventions to prevent further spread of infection. ICP C explained that the Infection Control Committee met a monthly, through the Quality Assurance Committee, and a report was provided to the committee monthly. ICP C was asked for the latest monthly report that was presented to the Infection Control Committee. ICP C explained that the last written report that was completed was February 2024. When asked why the other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to provide restorative/mobility services and choice of shower frequency, in a sample of 20 residents and a census of 100 residents, resulting in resident choices not honored, unmet goals, and the likelihood for functional decline. Findings include: In review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE], the facility had 114 licensed beds and the average daily census was 104. The same assessment revealed services and care offered were based on resident needs and preferences; and 102 residents required assistance with bathing. The same assessment indicated specific mobility program was offered per individual resident needs that included transfers, ambulation, contracture prevention/care. The same facility assessment indicated there were zero restorative nursing assistants and would add two staff once staffing levels were reached. Mobility Registered Nurse (RN) D was interviewed on 8/15/24 at 9:37 AM and stated she was pulled from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow one out of two residents (R9) to relocate to a chosen room of 2 residents reviewed for choices resulting in emotional distress manifested as frustration, anger, and depression. Findings include: On 8/13/24 at 12:15 PM R9 was resting in bed, awake and able to participate in an interview. R9 was asked how things were going and responded, Not good! R9 talked about his wife who was a resident on another hall. I was supposed to be able to move to a room across from her R9 explained. R9 said that during the time the move was anticipated the Administrator canceled the plan and I was never told why. R9 said he sees his wife (R27) and when they are together . we cry every day. R9 went on to describe a marriage of 45 years with deep commitment and bonding that leaves him feeling empty without her near presence. On 8/13/24 record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R9's admission date as 2/6/23 and with pertinent diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (Recurrent, unspecified). According to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to maintain mobility, in two of two residents reviewed for mobility (Resident #98 & #44), resulting in anxiety and unmet goals. Findings include: Resident #98 (R98) R98 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room on 8/13/24 at 11:37 AM. R98 stated during an interview that she was so anxious she could barely stand it. R98 stated her therapy services ended last week because she could not bear weight on her leg; she stated therapy explained she would receive restorative nursing services, but services had not started and she felt there was a lack of communication. R98 pointed to a daily activity flyer she had received and stated she wondered if she was supposed to attend range of motion (ROM, movement at each joint) exercise program scheduled at 4:00 PM; and staff had not told her she should attend the activity. R98's Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains To Intake MI00140863 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #3) was free from abuse of three reviewed, resulting in Resident 3 being abused by a staff member. Findings include: Review of the facility reported incident dated 10/27/2023 reflected Resident 3 was handled roughly be two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) F and G on 10/24/23 when putting R3 to bed for the evening. The facility reported incident also included the allegation of CNAF engaging in an aggressive manner with R3 on the same day after dinner. According to the clinical record Resident 3 (R3) was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility with diagnosis of dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] R3 scored 10 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment. On 10/30/2023 R3 scored 5 on the BIMS indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Of note, R3 resided on the facility's secured dementia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $110K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI