No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beaconshire Nursing Centre

21630 Hessel, Detroit, MI 48219 · For profit - Individual · 99 certified beds · (313) 534-8400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation$17,644 in federal fines4 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,644 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-22)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
22972 Lahser Rd · (248) 353-4777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
21737 W 8 Mile Rd · (313) 693-9973 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
20736 Lahser Rd · (248) 354-8181 · Call to confirm hours
Park
20700 Evergreen Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
20221 Lahser Rd · (313) 535-7999

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%10.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.0%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.5%12.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.3%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers14.3%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table41.2%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.8%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.2%11.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.091.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.721.641.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
<0.01U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show <0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified71.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.10
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.09
RN hoursweekends
46.7%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.10 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.10 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-02)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149479. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (R401) on oxygen with a known history of unsupervised smoking and noncompliance with smoking policy out of four residents reviewed for safety with smoking, which led to a fire resulting in a 2nd degree facial burns((an injury that damages the outer layer of skin (epidermis) and part of the underlying layer(dermis)) and hospitalization in the burn unit. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/10/25 when an untrained facility staff (sitter) failed to properly supervise R401during a smoke break leading to the R401 obtaining a lighter and cigarette. Later, R401 (while inhaling oxygen through a nasal canula) attempted to smoke in his bathroom unsupervised and lit his face on fire. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 1/22/25 at 3:50 PM. The IJ was removed on 1/22/25, but noncompliance remains at a potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI001444419, MI00145071, and MI00145216. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (R402) of three residents reviewed for elopements, resulting in a moderately cognitively impaired resident with behavior issues exiting a second-floor window and falling to the ground causing a left tension pneumothorax (collapsed lung), multiple acute rib fractures, left clavicle and scapulae fractures, and thoracic vertebrae fractures. Findings include: Review of the facility investigation and other pertinent documentation regarding a facility reported incident (FRI) that occurred on 4/26/24, revealed that it was reported R402 exited the facility to the outside through his second-floor bedroom window between 10:30 PM and 10:45 PM. R402 was brought back into the facility by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C and transported to the hospital at 11:02 PM. Review of the clinical record documented R402 was admitted into the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), resulting in the potential for increased risk of waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 03/31/2026 at 9:45 AM interview with Maintenance Director (MD) 'C' regarding the facility Water Management Program (WMP). MD 'C' said the administrator will have any program materials. When asked about implementing the WMP/legionella prevention he said he is new in this role since January 2026 and is still learning the job and the building systems. MD 'C' said has not attended any Water Management team (WMT) meetings, did not indicate any WMP controls currently in place, and there is not any routine fixture flushing or checking disinfectant residual. MD 'C' indicated being interested in learning more on the WMP guidance. MD 'C' said some of the water piping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises including plumbing, handrails, and bathroom surfaces. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living for all residents. Findings Include: On 04/01/2026 at 8:26 AM observed a four-inch pipe running along the ceiling between two dryers in the laundry room. Insulation around the pipe was observed peeling and with loose fibers exposed. An interview with Housekeeping Manager (HM) E at this time found they were unsure of what the pipe was and speculated it was an old water line. On 04/01/2026 at 8:32 AM observed a bucket beneath the handsink drain line in the laundry room. A pool of water was observed in the bucket. HM E indicated they would let maintenance know about the leak. On 04/01/2026 at 8:34 AM observed black residue along the wall adjacent to the shelves in the chemical storage closet in the laundry room. Further observation of the closet found several missing floor tiles leaving the floor mastic visible.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per Resident in multiple resident bedrooms, affecting five Resident rooms (111, 115, 119, 219, and 231). Findings include: Observation of the Resident rooms on 4/1/26 beginning at 11:45 AM, and review of the facility documentation revealed the following: ROOM # SQ. FT # OF BEDS # of Residents 111 157 2 2115 157 2 2119 157 2 2219 157 2 2231 159 2 2 During an interview on 4/1/26 at 12:15 PM, R8 said that their room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) was too crowded and that they felt as if there was not enough room. During an interview and observation on 4/1/26 at 1:21 PM, R43 was outside on the facility front porch. R43 said that there was not enough room in their room (room [ROOM NUMBER]). R43 complained that the position of their roommate's bed prevents R43 from opening their dresser drawer. On 4/2/26 at 8:59 AM, R43 was observed in their room sitting in a wheelchair reading a book. R43 indicated that wheelchair access…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications for one (R71) of one reviewed for self-administration of medication.Findings include:On 3/31/2026 at approximately 10:40 AM, during an observation of R71's room, a single blue pill in a medication cup was observed on R71's bedside table. The pill appeared dry. R71 was not in their room at the time of the observation. R71's roommate was in their bed but did not respond to questions.At approximately 10:45 AM, LPN I was informed of the medication observed at the bedside. Upon entering R71's room, LPN I stated, That shouldn't be there. LPN I removed the medication from the room. When queried as to the cognitive status of R71, LPN I said they were confused. When asked if R71 had an assessment or physician order to self-administer medications, LPN I said they were unsure. On 3/31/2026 at approximately 11:30 AM, R71 was queried about the medication but did not respond. A record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for medication administration for one resident (R71) of one resident reviewed for medication administration.Findings include: On 3/31/2026 at approximately 10:40 AM, during an observation of R71's room, a single blue pill in a medication cup was observed on R71's bedside table. The pill appeared dry. R71 was not in their room at the time of the observation. R71's roommate was in their bed but did not respond to questions.At approximately 10:45 AM, LPN I was informed of the medication observed at the bedside. Upon entering R71's room, LPN I stated, that shouldn't be there. LPN I removed the medication from the room. When queried as to the cognitive status of R71, LPN I said they were confused. When queried as to the cognitive status of the roommate, LPN I said they were somewhat confused. When asked if R71 had an assessment or physician order to self-administer medications, LPN I said they were unsure. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to implement interventions for residents at-risk for unplanned weight loss for one (R2) of six residents reviewed for nutrition status. Findings include:On 3/31/2026 at approximately 10:00 AM, R2 was observed in their room in bed. R2 voiced no complaints. On 4/1/2026 at approximately 8:37 AM, R2 was observed in their room eating breakfast. On the breakfast tray there was cold cereal, grits, orange juice, and raisin toast. The meal ticket on the tray read, regular diet, thin liquids. A record review was completed and revealed that R2 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to a local hospital on 2/6/2026, and re-admitted to the facility from the hospital on 2/11/2026. Admitting diagnoses included behavioral syndromes associated with physiological disturbances, personality disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions, depression, obesity, and hypertension. Section C of the Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 2/13/2026 revealed R2 scored a 10/15 on the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to 1232811.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for one resident (R407) of three resident reviewed for enhanced-barrier precautions resulting in the potential for the transmission of infectious organisms.Findings include:On 9/16/2025 at 10:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was observed to perform wound care and peri care on R407. LPN A was assisted by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) B. LPN A and CNA B did not put on a gown during patient care despite there being an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign on the door indicating R407 was on (EBP).During this time LPN C (unit manage) enter R407 room while wound care was being performed.On 9/16/2025 at 11:15 AM, CNA B was interviewed about (EBP) and said a gown should be worn when a resident has a foley catheter, wound and doing personal care.On 9/16/2025 at 11:17 AM, LPN A was interviewed and queried about the care they had performed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00152716. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was available and in place for 6 residents (R503, R508, R509, R510, R511, and R512) of 91 residing in the facility resulting in the potential for unmet needs, harm or serious injury. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that R503 did not have a call light or a way to notify staff that assistance was needed. On 6/4/25 at 11:50 AM R503's private room was observed to not have a call light cord plugged into the call light outlet. There was no desk bell or any other way to notify staff that assistance may be needed. R503 was not in the room at this time. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B entered the room and was asked where the call light was. CNA B could not find the call light cord or a bell. At this time Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was asked where the call light was for R503. The room was searched and no call light or bell was found in the room. On 6/4/25 at approximately 12:00 PM nurse unit manager, LPN C was asked about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains in intake: MI00153399 and MI00153424. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff reported a bruise of unknown origin for one (R503) of five residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in an unreported incident of potential abuse. Findings include: The State Agency (SA) received a complaint on 6/1/2025 that the resident had a bruises of unknown origin to the body and left breast. On 6/4/25 at 1:00 PM R503 was observed seated in the dining room eating lunch and interacting with other residents. R503 had bruises to both lateral upper arms at the same area where the resident's arms were touching and resting on the wheelchair's armrests. Upon interview the resident denied anyone hitting her or having pain to either upper arm area. The resident declined to go to her room for further skin assessment. On 6/4/25 at 1:15 PM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B reported they were unaware of any bruising to R503's upper arms. LPN B said the resident was on blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1) ensure desserts delivered to three unidentified residents were properly covered and (2) failed to maintain the ice machine in a clean and sanitary condition. Findings include: During lunch observations on 1/28/25 at 12:16 PM, a meal cart was delivered to the far end of the 1st floor residential unit. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B and CNA C delivered meal trays to the residents eating in their rooms at the far end of the hall. Beginning at 12:18 PM, CNA B and CNA C carried meal trays from the meal cart at the end of the hallway to the residents' dining room which was located half-way down the hall and down a shorter hall around a corner. Three meals trays were observed delivered to the dining room each with the dessert, cheese cake, uncovered. On 1/29/25 at 11:40 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) F said that all food should be covered on the tray. The CNAs should have brought the cart closer to the dining room prior to passing the trays to the residents eating in the dining room. DM F said food should be covered to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly dispose of refuse and maintain cleanliness of garbage and refuse areas resulting in the potential harborage of pests. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 5:29 p.m. during an observation of the environment, the following observations at the rear of the facility were made: Plastic cups, paper, used gloves, and cigarette butts were on the ground. 1. A wooden palette, electric fan cover, and a red storage container were propped against the building. The red storage bin was not covered, and revealed used gloves, soiled linen, and trash. 2. A large broken bed frame, used gloves, plastic soda bottles, and trash was near a back door. 3. Eight plastic storage bins, some were right side up and some were turned down stacked against the wall near the rear door. There was trash, used gloves and other debris around them on the ground 4. A container that was covered in a yellow tarp had frozen standing water in it with trash in it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings include: On 1/29/25 at 1:00 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was interviewed about the facility's QAPI program and process. The NHA identified having enough linen available was an area of concern and opportunity for improvement. The NHA said the QA committee developed a plan to have enough linen in the building and have enough staff to process it. The NHA stated, the QAPI effort involving linen included consistent monitoring and establishing a par level (a minimum amount of inventory that should be on hand to meet resident needs) to maintain. A facility document titled QAPI Action Plan documented in part the following as an area of improvement: Action Plan: Order linen and supplies once a week Responsible Person(s): Housekeeping supervisor Target Date: 6/30/24 Outcome: On going A facility document titled, QA Agenda - Housekeeping - June, dated 7/25/24, documented in part, Make (sure [sic]) my weekly orders are placed. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary laundry room and clean linen closet resulting in the potential for the spread of infection and disease transmission to residents and staff. Findings include: On 1/27/25 at 4:08 p.m. the clean linen closet located on the first floor had the following observations: 1. A folded gown and sheet were on the floor that was dusty and dirty. 2. A clean linen cart with clean linen was not covered. The cover was observed jumbled in a corner on the floor. 3. A heavily soiled sheet was on the floor next to the folded linen that was on the floor. 4. Employee's personal items (a jacket and purse) was on the floor behind the clean linen cart. On 1/28/25 at 4:58 p.m. the clean linen closet on the first floor was observed for the second time with the following observations: 1. Used gloves, straws, plastic wrapping, and dust was on the floor in various places in the closet. 2. The clean linen cart with clean linen was not covered. 3. A clean linen cart cover was jumbled in the corner on the floor. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the three-compartment sink was properly air gapped, resulting in this food equipment not being protected against contamination from sewage or other sources of contamination. Findings include: On 1/27/25 at 8:58 a.m. during a kitchen observation, a pipe underneath the three-compartment sink was observed. The pipe led to a drain in the floor that appeared to have three inches of space between them. However, a black cover was observed that was approximately 4-5 inches from the floor over the drain. The three inch air gap was surrounded by the black floor drain cover. On 1/28/25 at 2:10 p.m. the Dietary Manager (DM) F and Registered Dietician (RD) U were queried about the sink having the proper air gap. DM F stated, There hasn't been a sewage backup since I been here, so I'm not sure. RD U acknowledged the sink should have the proper air gap to prevent sewage from backing up into the pipe that could go into (contaminate) the sink. On 1/29/25 at 8:00 AM, Maintenance Director E acknowledged that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 1/27/25 at 11:50 AM, a computer on a medication cart was observed opened to R28's Electronic Medical Record, (EMR). Social Worker, (SW) Q was coming down the hall and stopped when directed to look at the resident's information on the computer screen. SW Q alerted the nurse that was coming down the hall that the computer was left opened. SW Q was then queried about R28's EMR being opened in the hallway so anyone walking by could see it and said it was a violation of the resident's privacy. On 1/27/25 at 11:55 AM, License Practical Nurse, (LPN) I was interviewed about leaving R28's EMR open and said that was not the normal computer they use. LPN I said they understand R28's EMR should not have been left open and they know it is a violation of R28's privacy. On 1/29/25 at 12:00 PM, the DON was interviewed about R28's EMR left opened. The DON said it was a violation of HIPPA. R28 was initially admitted on [DATE] with a pertinent diagnosis of Psychosis, Muscle Weakness, Schizophrenia, Vascular Dementia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to make timely repairs for the residents residing in rooms [ROOM NUMBER] resulting in unsafe, unhomelike, and dysfunctional paper towel dispenser. Findings include: On 1/27/25 at 11:30 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with the heating vent cover propped against the vent. The vent was observed with thick dust and dirt. The resident in bed one said the cover was taken off when maintenance was repairing the heat some time ago, I don't know why they haven't put it back on. The resident in bed two said when using the wheelchair, the cover gets knocked over. When that occurs, the resident propped it back against the vent. The residents also complained the temperature in the room gets cold. There was plastic on the windows, but maintenance took it off and didn't put it back up. There was a small heating unit (approximately the size of a personal space heater) mounted on the wall next to the window. There was some heat coming from it, but not blowing out strong.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149479. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an injury related to fire to the abuse coordinator for one resident (R401) out of four residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in an unreported incident of potential neglect. Findings include: On 1/13/2025 at 11:34 AM the State Agency received a complaint that on 11/10/2025 R401 lit a cigarette while on oxygen and lit his face on fire. On 1/15/2025 at 10:50 AM R401's guardian A was interviewed and said a staff member from the facility called to notify him on 1/11/25 or 1/12/25 that R401 lit his face on fire smoking again in is bathroom and was at hospital C. On 1/21/24 at 2:00 PM R401 was interviewed at Hospital L. R401 was observed as an African American male with dark colored skin. R401's tip of nose was pink in color missing skin, top lip pink in color missing skin, bottom lip was scabbed. Both lips appeared swollen. R401's right cheek appeared pink in color missing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149479. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one resident (R401) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in the absence of accurate documentation of R401's facial burns. Findings Include: On 1/13/2025 at 11:34 AM the State Agency received a complaint that on 11/10/2025 R401 lit a cigarette while on oxygen and lit his face on fire. On 1/15/2025 at 10:50 AM R401's guardian A was interviewed and said a staff member from the facility called to notify him on 1/11/25 or 1/12/25 that R401 lit his face on fire smoking again in is bathroom and was at hospital C for the treatment of facial burns. On 1/21/24 at 2:00 PM R401 was interviewed at Hospital L. R401 was observed as an African American male with dark colored skin. R401's tip of nose was pink in color missing skin, top lip pink in color missing skin, bottom lip was scabbed. Both lips appeared swollen. R401's right cheek…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146029. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident medication for one resident (R101) of three reviewed for misappropriation, resulting in resident experiencing pain and the potential for misappropriation to continue. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, R101 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included quadriplegia and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 7/824 revealed R101 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 and had a scheduled pain medication regimen. Review of Physician orders revealed R101 had an order for, Oxycodone 30 mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain with a start date of 3/28/24. Review of a Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2024 revealed Oxycodone 30 mg not given on 7/4, 7/5, 7/6, 7/7, 7/8, 7/9, 7/10, 7/11, 7/12,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146029. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation for one (R101) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed, R101 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included quadriplegia and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R101 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 and had a scheduled pain medication regimen. Review of Physician orders revealed R101had an order, Oxycodone 30 mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain with a start date of 3/28/24. Review of a Packing Slip dated 7/18/24 revealed, Oxycodone 30 mg was delivered for R101signed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F. Review of a Physician progress note with a date of 7/31/24 at 3:04 p.m. revealed, Reason for Visit: I am seeing and treating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake MI00146029. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the procedure for reconciling controlled substances (drugs that have high potential for abuse and misappropriation) for one (R102) resident from one of four medication carts reviewed for medication storage, resulting in the potential for drug diversion to go undetected. Findings include: In an observation and interview on 8/8/24 at 11:23 a.m. R102 had seven APAP Codeine 300-30mg (controlled substance, pain medication) tablets in the medication cart. The medication was counted on a Authorization For Controlled Substance Dispensing document. R101 did not have a proof of use record that included the dates, times or signature of medication removal. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B reported they are counting the medication when they remove it but not signing it out. Review of an admission Record revealed, R102 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely secure the second-floor dining room windows and resident room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom window from fully opening affecting all second floor residents who utilize the dining room and R405, resulting in the potential for additional unauthorized resident egress via the windows. On 7/23/24 at 9:05 AM in an observation with Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN) B the bathroom window in room [ROOM NUMBER] top pane did not lock and was able to fully open. LPN B said the window should lock and should not open all the way. It is not safe for residents because they can get out the window. On 7/24/24 at 10:45 AM in an observation of the second-floor dining windows with Maintenance Director (MD) A the left window top panel opened fully, middle left window top panel opened fully, the right window top panel opened fully. MD A agreed residents use the room and it would be possible for a resident to open the top panel of the window and exit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to (1) timely notify the guardian of an acute change in condition and (2) obtain consent and notify the guardian for a room change to a lockdown unit for one resident (R402). Findings include: Review of the facility investigation and other pertinent documentation regarding a facility reported incident (FRI) that occurred on 4/26/24, revealed that it was reported R402 exited the facility to the outside through his second-floor bedroom window between 10:30 PM and 10:45 PM. R402 was brought back into the facility by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C and transported to the hospital at 11:02 PM. Review of the clinical record documented R402 was admitted into the facility on 4/17/24 to a standard room (not located on a lockdown unit) with diagnoses that included left calcaneus fracture (non-weight bearing), schizophrenia, and convulsions. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], R402 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00144419. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an elopement resulting in injury to the State Agency (SA) for one (R402) of three residents reviewed for elopement. Findings include: The State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 4/30/24 for an incident that occurred on 4/26/24. The FRI reported that R402 exited a second-floor window and fell to the ground. R402 was observed on the ground outside by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C. LPN C noted multiple abrasions on mid back and both legs, right hand and right thigh. R402 was transferred to the hospital. On 7/24/24 at 2:00 PM the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was interviewed and said the FRI was submitted on 4/30/24 but it should have been submitted on 4/27/24. According to the facility's policy Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revised 7/11/24 revealed in part . VII. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide comfortable room temperatures for two residents (R302 and R303) out of three residents reviewed for increased environment temperature, resulting in residents discomfort and decrease in quality of life within the facility. Findings include: On 6/21/24 at 12:07 PM an observation of sample resident room temperatures was made with Maintenance Director A. Room temperatures were observed and documented as follows: room [ROOM NUMBER]- 86 degrees Fahrenheit (F) room [ROOM NUMBER]- 82 degrees F room [ROOM NUMBER]- 86 degrees F room [ROOM NUMBER]- 84 degrees F room [ROOM NUMBER]- 82 degrees F On 6/21/24 at 9:22 AM R303 was observed lying in bed with a fan pointed at her. R303's room felt stuffy and humid. When testing the air coming from R303's fan, there was lukewarm air coming through. R303 was asked how the temperatures have been in the facility for her in the last few days. R303 stated, It was so hot yesterday (6/20/24) it felt like I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the reason for discharge or a discharge summary was documented in the medical record for two of two residents (R501 and R502) reviewed for discharges/transfers. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that Residents R501 and R502 were transferred to another facility without sufficient documentation including reason for discharge that met the federal requirements for discharge. Resident 501 (R501): A review of R501's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 1/19/24. There was no documentation to support the basis for R501's discharge/transfer to another facility. There is no discharge summary or progress note from the physician to indicate why the resident's discharge was necessary. A progress note dated 1/17/24 indicated R501's Legal Guardian was aware of resident's transfer to another facility but no reason for discharge or transfer was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of the reason for transfer to another facility for two residents (R501and R502) reviewed for discharge/transfers. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that Residents R501 and R502 were transferred to another facility without notifying the resident, their representative, or the ombudsman of the reason for discharge. Resident 501 (R501): A review of R501's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 1/19/24. There was no documentation to support a notice was sent to the Ombudsman of the resident's transfer. Resident 502 (R502): A review of R502's EHR revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 1/19/24. R502 was his own responsible party with intact cognition. There was no documentation to support a notice was sent to the Ombudsman of the resident's transfer. On 2/13/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant in a sanitary manner, resulting in the increased likelihood for bacterial harborage and growth, and an unsafe, environment for residents, the public and staff. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 82 residents who resided in the facility at the time of survey. Findings include: On 12/4/2023 at 11:08 A.M. and on 12/5/2023 at 3:50 P.M. the following concerns were observed: 1. 40-42 missing floor tiles (approximately 4 x 4 inches) were removed from the floor leaving an uneven floor surface exiting and entering the kitchen. 2. The hallway leading to the kitchen was heavily soiled with dust, and cement powder residue. 3. The ceiling vents above the tray line area and doorway to the kitchen vent were soiled with, lint, and fuzz strings. 4. Standing floor water was observed in the dish room under the scrape table. In front of the three compartment sink the floor drain had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00139177 and MI00139604. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent staff to resident verbal abuse for two residents (R38 and R235) of 16 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in staff members abusing residents verbally and the potential for decreased self-esteem. Findings Include: Record review revealed facility's Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) reported to the State Agency an allegation of abuse on 9/3/23 at 7:11 PM. Incident summary documented that facility employee Sitter I was observed by LPN J using profanity toward R38. LPN J reported that Sitter I said, Why you touch my f*&King food, and then said, You got me f*$ked up . Record review of Abuse Investigation Statement dated on 9/5/23 by LPN J documented the following: 3. What did you see concerning the alleged incident? I was passing dinner trays I overheard Sitter I talking to the resident (R38). 4. What did you see concerning the alleged incident? I seen Sitter I flex her fist at R38. 5. What did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two (R17 and R22) of 27 residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in unmet care needs. Findings include: R17 In an observation on 12/4/23 at 10:43 a.m., Resident #17 (R17) had oxygen at 4 l/m (liters/minute). Review of an admission Record revealed, R17 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Hypoxemia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 8/23/23, revealed R17 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15. R17 required oxygen use. Review of R17's care plans revealed R17 did not have a care plan for oxygen use. Review of Physician orders revealed, R17 had an order, Administer oxygen therapy PRN (as needed) @ (at) 2 Liters as needed for Oxygen Saturation less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident for five rooms (#'s 111, 115, 119, 219, and 231) resulting in the potential for resident dissatisfaction with their living space and not having adequate space available for care. Findings include: Rooms 111, 115, 119, and 219 were each 157 square feet. Two residents resided in each room which yielded 78.5 square feet per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was 159 square feet. Two residents resided in this room which yielded 79.5 square feet per resident. Resident interviews and observations did not reveal any overt concerns related to the room size. On 1/29/25 at 4:40 PM during the exit conference, the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing did not offer additional documentation or information when asked.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident in five of 49 rooms in the facility (rooms 111, 115, 119, 219 and 231) resulting in the potential for inadequate living space. Findings include: On 12/4/2023 during an environmental tour of the facility, the facility document (which indicated waivered rooms) was reviewed and revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER] had 157 square feet and two residents which yielded 78.5 square feet per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] had 157 square feet and two residents which yielded 78.5 square feet per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] had 159 square feet and two residents which yielded 79.5 square feet per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] had 157 square feet and two residents which yielded 78.5 square feet per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] had 159 square feet and two residents which yielded 79.5 square feet per resident. A query and observation of the residents did not indicate a dissatisfaction with the adequacy of the living space. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,644 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 4 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $17,644 — penalty dated 2025-01-22
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-07-02 for 19 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-19 for 57 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-20 for 10 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-06 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PATEL, AMEEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2011
LAFFERTY, TRINAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2016

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$273per resident / day
operating cost
$8,301per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$240per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235475. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next