No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverview Health and Rehab Center North

18300 E Warren, Detroit, MI 48224 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (313) 343-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Nov 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$38,471 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $38,471 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-25)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
18700 Mack Ave · (313) 925-3486 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
18585 E Warren Ave · (313) 884-4184 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18330 Mack Ave · (313) 882-2530 · Call to confirm hours
Park
18151 E Warren Ave · (313) 224-1100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
17820 E Warren Ave · (313) 492-2904

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.5%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.2%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.5%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.6%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.4%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.3%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission9.7%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.261.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.321.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.6%CMS range 33.4–56.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.0–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.0–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.22
RN hours/ resident / day
1.39
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
59.4%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 141.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-02)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation contains two deficient practice statements: DPS#1 This citation pertains to intakes MI00142304 and MI00142542. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and follow elopement protocol for one resident (R12) who left the facility at an unknown time to staff. R12 was determined to be missing at 8:15 AM on 1/23/24. A moderately cognitively impaired resident with a BIMS of 8 left the facility with a recorded temperature of that day of 33 degrees Fahrenheit and raining. The facility was made aware R12 was at a city hospital at 11:23 AM. This resulted in the likelihood of serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment or death related to being struck by a motor vehicle and/or injury related to inclement weather. Further investigation of the incident revealed facility staff failed to supervise a cognitively impaired resident and respond appropriately to a door alarm (Emergency Door) on the Transitional [NAME] Unit. The alarm was tripped at approximately 1:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00145652. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review the Plan of Care (POC) and ensure adequate assistance when providing care for one resident (R4) out of four residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fractured pelvis and hematoma to the head. Findings include: On 7/16/24 the State Agency received a complaint stating on 7/2/2024 at approximately 11:00 P.M. the on-duty nurse (LPN A) and the Director of Nursing (DON) called the complainant reporting someone was changing R4 and in the process R4 was dropped on the floor. The complainant indicated R4 was taken to a local hospital and was found to have a fracture in the pelvis. R4 passed away in the hospital on 7/12/24, 10 days later. On 7/24/24 at 1:40 P.M., review of R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a Progress Note that documented in part: . Called to room by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA B) resident laying on left side on floor facing room window. Writer assessed resident, large size…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2632800.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse from a staff member to the State Agency in the required timeframe for one (R101) of four sampled residents reviewed for abuse resulting in an unreported allegation of abuse and the potential for more allegations of abuse to go unreported.Findings include:On 10/2/25 at 8:27 a.m., a complaint was submitted to the state agency. The complaint alleged (R101) was physically abused and sustained an injury. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) related to the complaint allegation was not found.On 10/6/25 at 12:17 p.m. a facility reported incident report involving R101 was requested. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) reported the facility did not have any FRIs involving R101.On 10/6/25 at 1:06 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), the Director of Nursing (DON), the Social Service Director (SSD) B, and the Regional Nurse Consultant F were present and queried having knowledge of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Properly date-label food stored in the walk-in freezer and walk-in cooler, 2. Ensure food past the use-by-date was not stored with active food stock; 3. Ensure two commercial ice machines were cleaned in a timely manner; and 4. Effectively clean surfaces in the kitchen. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all the residents who consumed food from the kitchen and consumed ice from the ice machines, resulting in the potential for food-borne illness. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 8:50 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) A, the following was observed inside of the walk-in freezer: a previously opened bag of approximately 12 bread sticks was not labeled. DM A stated, It's not labeled. It shouldn't be in here. The following items were observed inside of the walk-in cooler, but were not adequately date-marked to specify the opened date and/or prepared date, and the use-by date: 1. An 1/8 size pan of prepared tuna dated 3/30. 2. Three soup bowls of chicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document and ensure resident's activity preferences were honored for one resident (R61) out of two residents reviewed for activities, resulting in resident frustration and boredom. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 11:03 AM, R61 was observed alert and lying in bed wearing a facility gown. R61 stated, I like to be with people and get bored in my room. R61 stated, I can't do anything on my right side. To get up, staff must dress them and put them in their wheelchair. On 4/1/25 at 2:35 PM, R61 was observed alert and lying in bed wearing a facility gown. R61 stated, I want to be able to get up and go somewhere. I'm just bored. R61 added that staff can just roll them down the hall and they can talk with some people. R61 stated, It beats just laying here. On 4/1/24 at 2:46 PM, Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E said that R61 was not on the list to get up. A conversation was conducted with LPN E, R61, and the Surveyor. During this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures for one resident (R287) out of two residents reviewed for food preferences, resulting in the resident's dissatisfaction with the dining experience. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 12:39 PM, R287 was queried about meals received in the facility. R287 stated, My breakfast is always cold. On 4/2/25 at 8:15 AM, R287 was observed in their room, awake and sitting in a wheelchair. On 4/2/25 at 8:19 AM an insulated meal cart was delivered to R287's housing unit. On 4/2/25 at 8:30 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C delivered a breakfast tray to R287. The main entree was served on a plate covered with an insulated dome. R287 granted permission for the tray to be used as a test tray, and a replacement meal tray was ordered for R287. CNA C was present during the testing of food temperatures on R287's tray. The following temperatures were obtained using a metal stem thermometer: Scrambled eggs 92.8ºF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149358. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an injury of unknown origin to the abuse coordinator for one resident (R401) out of four residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 8:55 AM R401's guardian A was interviewed and said that on 11/16/24 a nurse from the facility reported to her that R401's leg was swollen and warm to the touch, an x-ray showed that R401's hip was fractured again. Guardian A said the incident was not reported and no one could tell her how R401 fractured her leg. Record review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R401 admitted to facility on 9/5/24 with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R401 revealed severely impaired cognition and required substantial assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149358. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to update/revise/review a care plan in a timely manner for one resident (R401) out of four residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 8:55 AM R401's guardian A was interviewed and said that on 11/16/24 a nurse from the facility reported to her that R401's leg was swollen and warm to the touch, an x-ray showed that R401's hip was fractured again. Guardian A said the incident was not reported and no one could tell her how R401 fractured her leg. Record review of R401's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed admitted to facility on 9/5/24 with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R401 revealed severely impaired cognition and required substantial assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify and discuss a room change with a resident and their responsible party for one resident (R801) of one residents reviewed for room changes, resulting in R801 being moved to a new room without approval of the responsible party and the increased potential for transfer trauma (physical, behavioral, and emotional reaction to a sudden change in ones surroundings). Findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:40 AM R801 was observed seated in a wheelchair in a private room on the 1st floor. During interview the resident said the private room was nice but missed being on the 3rd floor with friends. R801 said, They moved me because I was hanging around some girls. Nobody told me I couldn't have girlfriends. I didn't do anything, just hanging around them in their room. I won't hang around them anymore if I can go back upstairs. They didn't tell me nothing before, just moved me down here. According to R801's Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop or implement a person-centered behavior care plan for one (R801) of three residents reviewed for care planning resulting in R801 not having a care plan for behaviors of wandering and the potential for psychosocial needs to go unmet. Findings include: On 8/20/24 at 10:40 AM R801 was observed seated in a wheelchair in a private room on the 1st floor. During interview the resident said the private room was nice but missed being on the 3rd floor with friends. R801 said, They moved me because I was hanging around some girls. Nobody told me I couldn't have girlfriends. I didn't do anything, just hanging around them in their room. I won't hang around them anymore if I can go back upstairs. They didn't tell me nothing before, just moved me down here. According to R801's Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Paranoid Schizophrenia, and major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00143701. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to readmit one resident (R609) to the facility upon discharge from a hospital. Findings include: Record review of the Electronic Medical Record revealed R609 initially admitted into the facility on 1/24/23. R609 had a recent readmission date of 3/7/24. On 3/11/24, R609 was discharged to a hospital via a mental health petition for aggressive behavior. According to the complainant's intake statement, submitted to the State Agency on 4/2/24, I have contacted the Admissions Director to confirm the discharge date for (R609). I was told the patient could not return to the facility because (R609) was a danger to himself and others. The Guardian was not informed neither did the facility go through the proper procedure. (R609) is abandoned at the hospital and will not accept him back to his home, the facility. On 5/23/24 at 12:25 pm, Admissions Coordinator B was interviewed regarding the readmission policy and stated, When a resident goes to the hospital we have to take them back. At this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-21 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00134838. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure unrestricted, 24-hour visitation for all 141 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A complaint was submitted to the State Agency that the facility limited the times when family could visit residents in their rooms. On 2/11/24 at 8:30 AM, during the initial entry to the facility, there was no signage observed posted at the visitor entrance regarding resident visiting hours. During an interview on 2/12/24 at 10:03 AM, Resident #244's Concerned Family Member LL said she was upset because she had been previously denied visitation with her mother when she arrived at the facility around 8:00 PM. The facility visitation policy was requested on 2/13/24 at 3:07 PM. On 2/13/24 at 4:13 PM, a facility document titled, Visitation Policy, dated 3/1/22, was provided by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). A review of the Visitation Policy documented in part the following: - It is the policy of the facility to provide residents with a safe and secure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain food service equipment in a clean and sanitary manner; 2. Ensure walls in areas where food was prepared were clean; 3. Store the ice scoop in a clean and sanitary manner; 4. Ensure food items past the use-by-date were not stored with active food stock; 5. Properly date-label food; and, 6. Maintain cleanable surfaces (knife storage area and floor underneath the can opener). These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents who eat food served from the kitchen. Findings include: On 2/22/24 at 8:50 AM the kitchen was observed and the following was noted: Brown colored, scale-like material on the silver plating inside of the ice machine. Dried and crusted, grayish/brown sediment/debris on grease trap. Shiny, black debris observed in various areas around the kitchen walls near the sinks and stove area. The shiny, black debris was approximately -1/2 to 1 and 1/2 inch thick. The ice machine scoop was stored in a bin with brownish-gray colored film at the bottom of the bin. The scoop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-21 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director (MD) attended the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI-program aimed on improving processes involved in health care delivery and resident quality of life) meetings quarterly, resulting in the potential for impaired resolution of identified issues or decreased quality of care with the potential to affect all 141 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: During an interview and record review on 2/21/2024 at 12:32 PM, the QAPI program was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA said that QAPI team members met monthly and included managers and interdisciplinary team members. When queried if the medical director attends the required quarterly QAPI meeting the NHA stated The medical director did not participate in April, May, or June of 2023. The NHA agreed the medical director is required to attend quarterly meetings. Record review of the provided QAPI attendance records dated April 2023 through June 2023 sign in sheets revealed the signature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate and/or accurately complete residents' advance directives in a timely manner for five residents (R41, R43, R46, R67, and R105) of thirteen reviewed for resident's rights, resulting in the potential for resident wishes to not be honored. Findings include: R43 Record review of the Electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident had no documentation of an advance directive (legal document that provides directions for medical care when resident is unable to communicate wishes) being initiated since admission into facility. Record review of electronic medical records revealed R43 was admitted into facility on 1/11/24 with a pertinent diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R43 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15/15. R105 Review of the EMR revealed resident had no documentation of an advance directive being initiated since admission into facility. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive individualized care plans for four residents (R43, R104, R120, and R20) out thirty-eight residents reviewed for care plan interventions, resulting in the potential of unmet care needs. Findings include: R43 Record review of electronic medical records (EMR) revealed R43 was admitted into facility on 1/11/24 with a pertinent diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R43 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15/15. During observation on 02/11/24 at 02:16 PM, R43 had an oxygen concentrator and had oxygen being administered. A nebulizer machine was at the bedside. Record review of R43's Physician Orders revealed the following orders: 1. ipratropium-albuterol solution (respiratory medicine) for nebulization; 0.5 mg-3 mg (milligrams) (2.5 mg base)/3 mL; amount to Administer1 3 ml (milliliters) 1 inhalation. Every six hours prn (as needed)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that five out of five (FF, MM, NN, OO, and PP ) certified nurse aides (CNA) whose in-service files were reviewed, had the required annual competency evaluation in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents, resulting in the potential for staff incompetency and/or harm to resident's well-being. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 9:31 a.m. the following five certified nurse aide annual competency evaluations were reviewed: -CNA FF was hired on 10/25/19. The CENA Competency Evaluation was had a completion date of 8/10/22. -CNA MM was hired on 12/29/10. The CENA Competency Evaluation was had a completion date of 12/19/22. -CNA NN was hired on 6/23/17. The CENA Competency Evaluation was had a completion date of 12/20/22. -CNA OO was hired on 7/22/96. The CENA Competency Evaluation was had a completion date of (no date). -CNA PP was hired on 11/21/14. The CENA Competency Evaluation was had a completion date of 8/20/22. The facility did not have competencies for the year of 2023 for any the certified nurse aides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNAs) fulfilled the requirement to complete 12 hours of in-service education annually for five of five certified nurse aides (FF, MM, NN, OO, and PP) resulting in the potential for care performance concerns. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 10:31 a.m. the following five certified nurse aide annual 12-hour nurse aide training/ in-services were reviewed: -CNA FF was hired on 10/25/19. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. -CNA MM was hired on 12/29/10. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. -CNA NN was hired on 6/23/17. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. -CNA OO was hired on 7/22/96. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. -CNA PP was hired on 11/21/14. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. There was no evidence provided by the facility that annual 12-hour trainings/ in-services were completed for the certified nurse aides reviewed. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has three deficient practice statements. DPS#1 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control practices for five residents (R40, R43, R47, R97, and R104) out of five residents reviewed for respiratory care, resulting in improper storage of nebulizer tubing and the potential for cross-contamination. Findings include: R43 Record review of electronic medical records revealed R43 was admitted into facility on 1/11/24 with a pertinent diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R43 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15/15. During observation on 02/11/24 at 02:16 PM, th Nebulizer and tubing was sitting on nightstand. The tubing and mouthpiece was not stored in a dated plastic bag with resident's name. When asked, resident R43 reported that they use the same tubing all the time. During an observation of R43's room on 2/12/24 at 10:30 AM, Nebulizer and tubing was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure hand sinks were in good repair to be easily cleaned and sanitized in four rooms (1039,1040,1041, and 1044) out of fifteen rooms located on Trans East Nursing Station, resulting in the potential for harmful growth of microorganisms and injury. Findings include: During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/11/24 at 10:40 AM, A hand sink in a resident's room was found to have buckled Formica on front of sink area revealing sharp edges and porous water damaged wood exposed. During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/11/24 at 10:45 AM, A hand sink in a resident's room was found to have buckled formica on front of sink area revealing sharp edges and porous water damaged wood exposed. During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 2/11/24 at 11:00 AM, A hand sink in a resident's room was found to have buckled formica on front of sink area revealing sharp edges and porous water damaged wood exposed. During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified dining for one resident (R17) of one resident reviewed for eating assistance while in room, resulting in the potential for feelings of being ignored. Findings include: On 2/11/24 at 1:24 p.m., R17 was observed lying in bed resting with the television on. CENA FF brought the lunch meal tray into the room and proceeded to set up to assist with R117 with eating. CENA FF was then observed standing next to R17's bedside with left hand on the left hip with eating utensil and food in the right hand, and turned slightly to put food in the R17's mouth while CENA FF continued watching the television. On 2/11/24 at 1:27 p.m., CENA FF was asked was it appropriate to stand over the resident while assisting with eating. CENA FF stated, No. I didn't have a chair, so I guess yeah. On 2/13/24 at 10:42 a.m. record review revealed R17 was initially admitted into the facility on 3/6/18 and readmitted from the hospital on 2/6/24 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach of one (R92) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: On 2/11/24 at 12:50 PM, R92 was observed calling out for help. R92 was observed lying in bed, and stated, I need to be scooted up, I'm uncomfortable. The call light cord was observed clipped to the head of the mattress and the call light button was observed on the floor next to bed. When asked, Can you use your call light to call for help? R92 attempted to reach for call light but was unable to find the call light. Record review of R92's face sheet revealed admitted to facility on 3/22/2021 diagnoses included congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, bilateral knee osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R92 revealed a Brief interview for Mental Status BIMS of 7/15 severely impaired cognition and dependent assistance for mobility. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide showers as desired for one resident (R103) of two residents reviewed for choices, resulting in resident dissatisfaction. Findings include: On 02/11/24 at 3:43 PM during interview R103 explained they had desire to have a shower. R103 said the last shower had been October of 2023. On 02/12/24 at 11:55 AM record review revealed a physician order dated 2/10/22 designating shower days as Wednesday and Saturday on day shift. On 02/13/24 at 10:32 AM record review of Bath/Shower sheets revealed: 1/2/24 Bed bath 1/9/24 Bed Bath 1/16/24 No documentation of type of bath. 1/19/24 Refused X 3 (Did not specify if resident refused bath or shower.) 1/23/24 Refused X 3 (Did not specify if resident refused bath or shower.) 1/26/24 Bed bath 1/30/24 Refused X 3 (Did not specify if resident refused bath or shower.) According to record review, R103 had a pertinent diagnosis of bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip. R103 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. According to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment for two residents (R40 and R79) out of two residents reviewed for safe, clean, homelike environment resulting in resident dissatisfaction and discomfort with living conditions. Findings include: R40 On 2/11/2024 at 2:38 PM, R40 was interviewed about their satisfaction with the care and services that they were receiving at the facility. R40 stated, There is a ceiling tile missing over my toilet it got wet and fell off and the other ceiling tile is stained probably from the toilet above me leaking. R40 expressed dissatisfaction with the appearance of the bathroom and reported that he has told staff numerous times about the bathroom condition. In an observation and interview on 2/13/2024 at 8:45 AM with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) C R40's bathroom ceiling tile was replaced. A new active yellow stain on replaced ceiling tile was observed. When queried about the active yellow stain MS C stated There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to file a report with the state of Michigan within a 24-hour period concerning an allegation of staff to resident abuse for one resident (R115) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Record review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 7/09/23 at 04:50 AM, documented LPN (licensed practical nurse) I grabbed the gown of (R115) swinging the chair (wheelchair) around hitting the water fountain. According to the FRI, this action (wheelchair coming in to contact with the water founntain) dislodged the water fountain from the wall. On 2/21/24 at 12:09 PM, the nursing home administrator (NHA) was queried regarding the incident involving R115. The NHA said the incident should have been reported immediately. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse and Neglect Prohibition Policy revealed documentation concerning reporting and stated in part, The facility will report all allegations and substantiated occurrences of mistreatment, abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property or injuries of unknown source…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR-determines whether or not an individual who has a diagnosis of Mental Illness or Intellectual/Developmental Disability [ID/DD] meets the criteria for a nursing home and their needs are met) Level I (3877) was completed for three sampled resident's (R93, R97, and R89) from a total sample of 38 resulting in the potential for unmet mental health care needs. Findings include: R93 Record review of R93's face sheet revealed admitted to facility on 1/19/2021 diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R93 revealed a Brief interview for Mental Status BIMS of 13/15 indicating intact cognition. A review of R93's electronic medical record (EMR) did not reveal any current PAS/ARR forms (DCH-3877) or Level ll evaluation. There was no Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for one resident (R101) out of nine residents reviewed for hygiene, resulting in a dependent residents nail care not being performed. Findings include: R101 Record review of R101's electronic medical record revealed admission into the facility on 6/7/23 with a pertinent diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of body). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R101 had slight impaired cognition and required substantial to maximal assistance with ADL care. During an interview on 2/11/24 at 2:03 PM, R101 reported that foot and nail care had not been provided. Observation of bilateral hands revealed all fingernails protruded past fingertips and had dark brown debris underneath. R101 further reported, It would be nice if they could be cut. During observations on 2/12/24 at 11:30 AM, 2/13/24 at 10:20 AM, and on 2/14/24 at 10:29 AM, R101's bilateral hands…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide vision services for one of one resident (R120) reviewed for vision concerns, resulting in inadequate accommodations of vision needs and potential for further deterioration of vision. Findings include: On 2/11/24 at 1:49 p.m. R120 was observed resting in bed with a pair of red glasses on. R120 was alert and oriented to name only. R120 was nonverbal however responded by looking and smiling when name was called. Due to the R120's verbal communication and cognitive impairment, the resident was unable to participate in the interview. On 2/11/24 at 3:12 pm during the resident representative interview, the family member expressed concern with the resident's vision. The family member said R120 was never seen by an eye doctor since admission (one year ago). The family member also said the resident has had the same pair of glasses for the last 15 years and stated, Never had good vision anyway but still deserves to see the eye doctor. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate foot care for one resident (R101) out of nine residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), resulting in R101 having overgrown toenails with debris. Findings Include: During an interview on 2/11/24 at 2:03 PM, R101 reported that foot and nail care had not been provided. An observation of bilateral feet revealed resident's toenails were greenish in color and had had debris underneath. Nails were thick and had grown passed the end of toes and had started curving outwards. R101 further reported, It would be nice if they could be cut. Record review of R101's electronic medical record revealed admission into the facility on 6/7/23 with a pertinent diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of body). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R101 had slight impaired cognition and required substantial to maximal assistance with ADL care. During observations on 2/12/24 at 11:30 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow therapy recommendations to initiate restorative services to maintain range of motion (ROM) and mobility for one resident (R98) of six residents reviewed for ROM, out of a total of 28 sampled residents resulting in the potential for a decline in range of motion, and mobility and worsening of contractures. Findings include: R98 On 2/11/2024 at 10:28 AM, R98 was queried about life in the facility, R98 said, I'm only getting speech therapy I was supposed to have someone work on my hand and legs. I finished physical and occupational therapy but haven't had anyone else come in and work with me. R98 was observed with both lower extremities flexed in a side lying position with left hand flexed into a fist. Record review of R98's face sheet revealed admission into facility on 11/18/2022 with most recent readmission on [DATE]. R98's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, pressure ulcer sacral region.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00141655. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a foley catheter (urine drainage system) was properly secured to the resident's leg, for one resident (R27) out of two residents reviewed for catheter care, resulting in the potential for injury. Findings include: During an interview on 2/11/24 at 10:25 AM, R27 reported that his foley was not anchored and secured to his leg causing it to pull on his penis. During an observation on 2/11/24 at 10:25 AM, it was revealed that there was an anchor attached to tubing, but it was not adhered to R27's leg. It was further reported that it had been like that for days. During an observation on 2/12/24 at 9:00 AM, foley tubing was not anchored and secured to R27's leg. During an observation on 2/13/24 at 3:11 PM, foley tubing was not anchored and secured to R27's leg. During an interview on 2/13/24 at 3:11 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P, it was reported that the foley catheter should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to respond to a pharmacy recommendation for one resident (R3) of two residents reviewed for medication and medication regimen, resulting in a lack of follow-up for possible needed changes. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 1:08 PM resident (R3) observed resting in bed. Review of the electronic medical record revealed R3 is a resident with a pertinent diagnosis of vascular dementia with behavior disturbance. R3 is currently in hospice care. On 2/13/24 at 2:30 PM, record review revealed a pharmacy recommendation dated 8/20/23 to consider a gradual dose reduction for R3 of Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication). There was no documented evidence that Physician O responded agree disagree other on the form. In addition, Physician O did not sign the form. On 2/21/23 at 2:09 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and said Physician O should have responded to the pharmacy recommendation dated 8/20/23 for resident R3. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regiment Review Policy (undated) documented, For non-urgent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to justify the use of three medications for one resident (R3) of two residents reviewed for medication and medication regimen, resulting in potential ineffective resident care. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 1:08PM resident (R3) observed resting in bed. R3 is a resident with a pertinent diagnosis of vascular dementia with behavior disturbance. R3 is currently in hospice care. On 2/13/24 at 12:19PM during record review of R3's electronic medical record it was noted that Physician O had written an order on 8/10/23 for Lorazepam 2mg/ml 0.25ml every 4 hours PRN (as needed). The category for this medication listed on the order was as follows: Central Nervous System Agents | Anticonvulsants | Benzodiazepines (Anticonvulsants). The order did not indicate a resident diagnosis and did not provide an indication. (An indication for a drug refers to the use of that drug for treating a particular disease.) On 2/13/24 at 12:29PM record review of R3's electronic medical record noted that on 8/9/23 the Physician O had written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical equipment in safe operating condition. Findings include: On 2/11/24 at 8:59 AM an observation of the third floor revealed the bladder scanner had a broken attachment at the portion of the cord which connects directly to the scanning device. There were multiple wrappings of clear office tape around the cord. This had separated from the device for a space approximately one half inch leaving the cords exposed. On 2/12/24 at 8:37 AM, the unit manager (UM) L was asked about the use of the bladder scanner. Unit Manager L said the bladder scanner is used for residents as needed. On 2/13/24 at approximately 2:00 PM the information the facility provided was reviewed which indicated the bladder scanner would be used for R66 on that day. On 2/13/24 at 4:31 PM during an interview, the DON and the Maintenance Supervisor C and acknowledged the bladder scanner should not be used on a resident due to its broken condition.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently utilize the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week, affecting all residents who resided in the facility, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Record review of facility's Schedule and Staffing Sheets revealed the following: 7/03/22 (Sunday)- No RN coverage. 7/4/22(Monday)-No RN coverage. 7/17/22 (Sunday)-No RN coverage 9/5/22 (Monday)- No RN coverage. 9/11/22(Sunday)- No RN coverage. During an interview with Director of Nursing (DON), it was confirmed that an RN should be on the premises for eight consecutive hours every day. When asked the reason for this protocol, DON said, It is a regulation and RNs provide a skill level that should be available if needed. After review of facility's Schedules and Staffing Sheets during interview, DON confirmed that there were no RN coverage hours on 7/3/22, 7/4/22,7/17/22,9/5/22, and 9/11/22. Record review of policy Nursing Staffing (no date) documented the following: . 2. The nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-12 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, resulting in the potential for knowledge deficits pertaining to current infection prevention and control standards and infectious disease outbreaks in a vulnerable population. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 136 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form #20054 Infection Prevention, Control and Immunizations, dated 10/26/2022, revealed that facilities are required to designate at least one qualified Infection Preventionist who completed specialized training prior to assuming the role of Infection Preventionist and that evidence of completion of this specialized training must be available. On 1/10/23 at 1:05 PM during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F who is the facility's designated Infection Control Nurse said she had not completed the required specialized training for Infection Control at this time. LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-12 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their COVID-19 policy and demonstrate they had screened for, educated, offered, and documented acceptance or declination for COVID-19 Immunization for five (R81, R105, R121, R145, and R149) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 Immunization resulting in the potential for miscommunication and misunderstanding of Resident COVID-19 Immunization preferences. Findings include: A review of the facility's most recent 'Resident COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker Report' (undated) indicated that Residents R81, R105, R121, R145, and R149 were not vaccinated for COVID-19. No explanation was identified on the report. On 1/10/23 at approximately 10:30 AM during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F, the facility's designated Infection Control Nurse she said the Public Health Department (PHD) had COVID-19 clinics and came into the facility to administer the COVID-19 shots. LPN F could not say when the PHD had last been to the facility or when they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they consistently offered and administered influenza and pneumonia vaccines with accessible and valid documentation of acceptance or declination in the medical record for 4 (R81, R105, R145, R149) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations, resulting in the lack of vaccine tracking, the residents right to choose and receive vaccine treatment options, and the right to an informed consent. Findings include: On 1/10/23 at 10:00 AM the facility's influenza and pneumonia vaccination records were reviewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F, the facility's designated Infection Control Nurse. LPN F said the completed consent/declination forms for the influenza and pneumonia vaccines should be in the 'preventative health' section of the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR). LPN F explained the facility's vaccination documentation process, There is a binder for the vaccine consent forms. When the resident accepts the vaccine (consents), the signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately transcribe a physician's medication order and correctly document the medication administration on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for standards of practice resulting in R1 not receiving a lidocaine pain patch (topical anesthetic) in accordance to the physician's orders. Findings include: On 1/9/23 at approximately 11:00 AM R1 was observed laying in her bed on her left side, complaining of pain in her lower back area. R1 said, I get a pain patch on my back once a day, and I haven't gotten it yet. I told the nurse I wanted my pain patch. She said I already got it and I know I didn't. R1 was laying on her left side with the patch visible on the right side of her lower back. The patch had an administration time of 1/8/23 at 6 AM clearly written on it. A review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI0027872. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fresh water was passed in a timely manner for one resident (R105) out of two residents reviewed for hydration, resulting in the potential for feelings of thirst and dehydration. Findings include: In an observation on 1/9/23 at 12:53 p.m., two foam water cups sat on Resident #105's (R105) bedside table. One cup had no date and the other was dated 1/7/23. Review of a Face Sheet revealed, R105 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included Parkinson's disease and Adult Failure to thrive. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 10/16/22 revealed R105 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. R105 required extensive assist of one staff with eating. In an observation on 1/10/23 at 12:13 p.m., two foam water cups with a date of 1/9 sat on R105's bedside table. Review of a Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$38,471 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $12,179 — penalty dated 2024-07-25
  • $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-02-21
  • $6,682 — penalty dated 2024-02-21
  • $15,593 — penalty dated 2024-02-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-20 for 86 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DRSN ASSOCIATES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/30/2011
SIMBENI, ANTONIOIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/15/2012
KAMEGO, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/30/2011
LEVIN, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/30/2011

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.8M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 4%Other / private 33%

This home reported $3.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$314per resident / day
operating cost
$9,551per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$301per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235476. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next