Bay County Medical Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 161 beds and averages 93.7 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.32 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.79 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.53 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake 2660956.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the one (#701) resident's right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident of three residents reviewed resulting in a non-verbal, severely cognitively impaired resident (#701) having their genital area touched by Resident #702, and staff not immediately separating the residents. Findings include:Review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) documentation revealed on 10/12/25 at approximately 11:37 AM, the Administrator was informed of allegation of sexual abuse involving Resident #701 and Resident #702. Per the FRI, Resident #702 is Resident #701's father and was witnessed by staff with their placed on (Resident #701's) groin region. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1218/25 at 10:00 AM. During the interview the DON verbalized the facility switched Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system from Matrix to Point Click Care (PCC) on 10/1/25. Review of facility provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Prevent and implement preventive measures to avoid pressure ulcers for 2 residents (Resident #39 and Resident #62) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and 2) Follow through with the intervention of an air mattress for 1 resident (Resident #39), resulting in Resident #62 having a facility-acquired, preventable, Stage IV pressure ulcer and, for both residents, an increased likelihood for infection, cross contamination, antibiotic usage with side effects, pain, and discomfort. Findings Include: Resident #39: Review of the Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 7/24, and physician orders dated 4/13/25 through 4/17/25, and nurses' progress notes dated 4/13/25 through 4/17/25, revealed Resident #39 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], alert and able to make own healthcare decisions, had a trach (artificial breathing stoma) and dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living/ADL. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise and prevent injuries/falls for three residents (Resident #7, Resident #18, Resident #279), resulting in multiple injuries of residents and prolonged illness and hospitalizations. Findings included: Record review of the facility 'Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation' policy dated 3/30/2023 revealed it is the policy of the facility to report all allegations of abuse/neglect/exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other appropriate agencies. Injuries of unknown source: Includes circumstances when both the following conditions are met. (i.) The source of the injury was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident. (ii.) The injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury, location of the injury, the number of injuries…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 04/27/2026 at 9:27 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with Director of Dining Services L, observed the drain line to the ice machine sitting inside the drain. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention. (A) Except as specified in (B), (C), and (D) of this section, a direct connection may not exist between the SEWAGE system and a drain originating from EQUIPMENT in which FOOD, portable EQUIPMENT, or UTENSILS are placed. On 04/27/2026 at 9:54am observed the interior walls of the microwave visibly soiled in the one east kitchenette. During this observation, Director of Dining Services L was interviewed on how often the microwave is cleaned, and he stated it's cleaned after every use. On 04/27/2026 at 10:00am observed the interior wall of oven door visibly soiled with grease in the one west kitchenette.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP) and, follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents identified with qualifying wounds, for one resident #65 (R65) of three residents reviewed for infection prevention. This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.Findings include: On 04/27/2026 at 9:27am observed ice machine filter dated 4/30/2020. On 04/27/2026 at 1:28pm observed an unused ozone treatment for the washers located in the laundry chemical room. The ozone tanks are partially capped from the plumbing system leading to the washers, but it remains connected to the water lines leading out towards the hallways. During this observation, Environmental Services Director O was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate backflow prevention was installed at plumbing fixtures, resulting in the potential for contamination to the water supply, affecting all residents. Findings include:On 04/27/2026 at 9:50am observed chemical feeder downstream of an atmospheric vacuum breaker (AVB) at the mop sink in the janitor's closet adjacent to the kitchen. On 04/27/2026 at 10:15am observed hose with attached spray nozzle downstream of a hose bib vacuum breaker (HBVB) in the trash compact area. On 04/27/2026 at 10:16am observed chemical feeder downstream of an AVB in the trash compact area. On 04/27/2026 at 1:54pm observed outside spigot with an attached hose without backflow prevention. During this observation, Assistant Director of Plant Operations N stated the backflow preventer is on work order, but they haven't gotten to installing them yet. On 04/27/2026 at 2:08pm observed an inside spigot with an attached hose without backflow prevention in the old garage. During this observation, Assistant Director of Plant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that timely care was provided in a dignified manor to 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents R4, R10 and R45).Findings include: A review of R4's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 2/20/24 and re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia, muscle weakness and open wound of scrotum and testes. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10/15 that indicated moderately impaired cognition and the Resident was dependent on helper for personal hygiene and toileting hygiene and needed substantial/maximal assistance to roll left and right. On 4/29/26 at 9:20 AM, an observation was made of the Resident lying in bed. CNA R had the Resident positioned flat on his back with covers off, gown pulled up, and incontinence brief opened. The CNA was assisting with perineal care. The Resident's bed was elevated to about window height. There was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were in place and completed appropriately for one resident (Resident #99) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #99's (R99) most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, heart disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and dysphagia.Further review of the medical record revealed R99 was able to make his own informed medical decisions. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed R99 was cognitively intact and was able to make his own medical decisions.Review of R99's Resident Code Status and Specific Treatments form dated 4/16/26 revealed that Do not resuscitate (DNR) was selected, however R99 did not sign the form, rather R99's wife had signed the form.Further review of R99's medical record failed to reveal any type of Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) for Health Care (HC)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide clinical rationale for administration of duplicate/triplicate antidepressant therapy of two (#6 & #55) residents of six reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings Include:Resident #6On 4/28/2026 at approximately 1:00 PM, a review was completed of Resident #6's medical records and it revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Insomnia and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Further review of Resident #6's chart yielded the following:Physician Orders:Escitalopram (Lexapro) Oxalate Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligrams) for Major Depressive Disorder.Trazadone HCI (hydrochloride) Oral Tablet 50 MG for Major Depressive DisorderLexapro and Trazadone are both antidepressants.Care Plan: .admitted with diagnoses of Deprssion, Anxiety, Panic Disorder and insomnia in addition to Dementia. administer medications as prescribed.psychotropic medication management provided by (psychiatric…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing changes were completed timely for one resident (R23) of one reviewed for PICC lines. Findings include:R23 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include infection of a superficial incisional surgical site, acute respiratory failure and atherosclerotic heart disease. On 04/27/2026 at 11:08AM, a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line was observed in the right upper arm of R23. The dressing was dated 4/15/26. On 04/27/2026 at 11:11AM, record review revealed a physician's order dated 03/26/2026 that reads: PICC line dressing change one time a day every Wednesday related to infection following a procedure, superficial incisional surgical site subsequent encounter. On 04/27/2026 at 11:13AM, record review of the April 2026 treatment administration record (TAR) revealed that on 04/22/2026 the dressing change was signed out as not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed out weekly and nebulizers were stored properly for two residents (R2 and R75) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #2 (R2) was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, heart failure and tachycardia. During an observation on 04/27/2026 at 12:39PM, R2's oxygen tubing was dated 4/20/26 and there was a nebulizer in a bag, hanging on the wall next to the bed. The nebulizer equipment was stored together, and moisture was noted in the medication reservoir. During an observation on 04/28/2026 at 1:10PM, R2's nebulizer was found hanging on the wall in a bag, was dated 4/20/26 and the oxygen tubing was dated 4/20/26. During an interview on 04/28/2026 at 1:18PM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was asked how often the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Numbers 2716028, 2716054 and 2723179.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed 2 resident's (Resident #101 and Resident #104) plans of care for safe transfers of 5 residents reviewed, resulting in falls with a fracture, and a head injury, with hospitalization.Findings Include: Resident #101:Review of the Face Sheet, physician orders and care plans dated 9/2018 through current, revealed Resident #101 was 88 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], had cognitive impairment, required assistance with all Activities of daily Living/ADL's and was a two person assist for all transfers. The residents diagnosis included, Vascular Dementia with behaviors, Stroke with Hemiplegia and weakness of the right side, and Heart Disease. Review of the facility Accident/Incident report dated 12/27/25, revealed on on 12/27/25 at 5:15 a.m., Nursing Assistant/CNA I was assisting the resident to bed by her self. CNA I lifted the resident up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean, reusable medical equipment for one resident (Resident #12) and hand hygiene for one resident (Resident #62), resulting in cross-contamination and the likelihood of further cross-contamination. Findings include. On 4/16/25, at 1:48 PM, an observation of Nurse P at Resident #12's doorway was conducted. Nurse P asked Nurse Q if they had scissors. Nurse Q entered their left pocket, pulled out a pair of scissors and handed them to Nurse P. Nurse P entered Resident #12's room and closed the door. Upon opening Resident #12's door, an observation was made of Nurse P cleaning the scissors with an alcohol pad with their gloved hands. Nurse P was asked if they were using an alcohol pad and Nurse P offered, Yes, its an alcohol pad. On 4/16/25, at 1:55 PM, Nurse Q was asked if the scissors were shared scissors and Nurse Q offered, the scissors were shared. Nurse Q was asked what their normal disinfection process was for reusable scissors…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$165,536 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $116,805 — penalty dated 2025-03-11
• $48,731 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-16 for 29 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-11 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $38K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI