No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Corewell Health Rehab & Nursing Center-Commons Far

21450 Archwood Circle, Farmington Hills, MI 48336 · Non profit - Corporation · 179 certified beds · (248) 477-7400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (248) 477-7400 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 actual-harm citations$15,593 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-24)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
21440 Archwood Cir · (248) 473-8411 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
30020 Grand River Ave · (248) 477-1467 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
30020 Grand River Ave · (248) 476-1808 · Call to confirm hours
Park
21900 Middlebelt Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
30687 Grand River Ave · (248) 516-5533

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.6%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.2%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.9%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.6%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.0%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.7%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.3%14.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.9%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.0%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.431.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.391.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.4%CMS range 33.6–50.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.8–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization4.9%CMS range 2.5–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.751.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.07
RN hours/ resident / day
1.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
39.3%
Total nursing turnover
5.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 179 beds and averages 101.6 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 77 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement safety interventions to prevent an avoidable fall for one resident (R803), of one resident reviewed for falls, resulting in a transfer to the emergency room where it was discovered R803 sustained a left tibia (shin bone) fracture, a contusion (bruise) to the left upper extremity, and an abrasion to the right upper extremity. Findings include: On 2/24/26 at 9:00 AM, a review of a nursing progress note dated 11/29/25 at 12:48 AM entered into the record by Nurse 'E' was reviewed and read, Note Text: Writer was called by caregiver (Certified Nurse Aide 'D') that resident fell to the floor. Upon rushing to the room, resident was laying on the floor next to bed with body in curled position leaning towards her right side, bed was in high position with the bed unlocked. The CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) said she rolled the resident towards herself but unfortunately the bed rolled backwards and resident fell forward to the floor. Resident sustained hematoma to the forehead, skin tear left deltoid and right elbow. Complained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-02-25 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review lab values prior to the administration of D5% 0.45% NS (an intravenous fluid solution that contains .45 grams of sodium chloride (NS) and 5 grams of dextrose (sugar) per 100 milliliters) for one resident (R802), of one resident reviewed for the physician's responsibility to review the resident's total program of care at each visit, resulting in R802 receiving continuous IV fluid containing dextrose for approximately two days after the lab reported a critically high glucose level, which subsequently required an emergency transfer to the hospital for hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar). Findings include: On 2/25/26 at 8:10 AM, a review of R802's closed clinical record was conducted and revealed R802 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/10/25. R802's diagnoses included: psychotic disorder with delusions, delirium, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and mood disorder.A progress note entered into the record by Nurse 'B' on 12/8/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2575124.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and implement timely treatment for a shearing injury for two (R801 and R803) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in R801 developing an avoidable Stage III (Full-thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer that worsened to an Unstageable (Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcer. Findings include:A review of R801's clinical record revealed R801 was admitted into the facility on 6/13/25 and discharged on 7/18/25 with diagnoses that included: spinal stenosis. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R801 had intact cognition, required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility and transfers, was always incontinent of urine and stool, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, and did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers at the time of the assessment.A review of an admission Assessment dated 6/14/25 (the day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that safe transfer techniques were implemented based on the physician order and assessment for one (R907) resident of one reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall, with right intertrochanteric/femoral neck (hip) fracture, right maxillary sinus orbital floor (facial bone) fracture, and right nasal bone fracture which required a transfer to hospital and surgical intervention and pain. Findings include: R907 was a long-term care resident of the facility. R907's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, spinal cord injury (C5 level), and cervical disc disorder with myelopathy (compression of the spinal cord at the cervical level that can cause weakness/numbness in hands and arms, loss of balance and coordination etc.). R907 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments dated 7/21/23 and 4/21/23. Based on the 7/21/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 2792320.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment for two (R905 and R907) of three residents reviewed for environment. Findings include:Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency included concerns that the facility was not clean and when they visited the resident, their bedside and overbed tables were frequently dirty with sticky substances.On 4/20/26 at 10:40 AM, R905 was observed lying in bed, leaning slightly on their left side with a green wedge pillow under their left torso. The left side of the bed ran along the wall/window and the other side had an overbed tray table with the call light on the floor, under the feet of the overbed tray table. The entire edging around the overbed tray table was observed to have lifted/peeled edges which exposed the particle board (non-cleanable surface) and the metal portion of the tray table stand was covered with dried dark substance.The top surface of the bedside dresser was observed to be soiled with a thick white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2792320Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a referral for home health care was made and confirmed before discharge for one resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for discharge planning. Findings include:On 4/20/26 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R901 did not have a home health referral made and confirmed by the facility prior to their discharge back into the community on 1/23/26 and that a family member had to call back to the facility a few days later to have them make and confirm the referral resulting a delay in starting home health care. On 4/20/26 the medical record for R901 was reviewed and revealed the following: R901 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Type two diabetes and Presence of cardiac pacemaker. A review of R901's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/27/25 revealed R901 needed assistance from staff with most of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2792320.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow nursing professional standards of practice related to physician orders for medication administration for two (R901 and R905) of three residents reviewed for professional standards. Findings include:R901 On 4/20/26 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed that alleged R901 was not properly administered their medications. On 4/20/26 the medical record for R901 was reviewed and revealed the following: R901 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Type two diabetes and Presence of cardiac pacemaker. A review of R901's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/27/25 revealed R901 needed assistance from staff with most of their activities of daily living. R901's BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) was 15 indicating intact cognition. A Physician's order revealed the following: Midodrine HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2792320.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide proper assistive devices to maintain hearing for one (R905) of two residents reviewed for assistive devices. Findings include:Review of a complaint reported to the State Agency included concerns that read, I brought her hearing aids to the facility so that she could hear. Staff wouldn't give them to her and wouldn't give her time to get them prior to going to PT (Physical Therapy), so she couldn't hear while in therapy.Review of R905's physician orders and corresponding Medication/Treatment Administration Records (MAR/TAR) included: Apply resident hearing aids upon awaking daily for better communication. every day shift for communication - Start Date - 01/22/2026 0700. The MAR was documented as completed via a check mark and nurse initials from 4/1-4/20/26 with no documentation of any chart codes/follow up codes such as missing, refused, etc. The documentation revealed Nurse 'I' had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2792320.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions per plan of care for two (R903 and R905) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include:R903 On 4/20/26 at approximately 9:28 a.m., 12:07 p.m., 1:13 p.m. and 2:49 p.m., R903 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R903's bed was observed to be high (approximately 3.5 ft off the floor) without any floor mats around the bed. A floor mat was observed on its side, laying up against the wall at the foot of the bed. On 4/20/26 the medical record for R903 was reviewed and revealed the following: R903 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's and Hearing loss. A review of R903's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/27/26 revealed R903 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R903's BIMS score (brief interview of mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 12/16/2025 at 9:20 AM, there were 3 uncovered bins of clean dessert sized cups stored next to the handwashing sink. When queried about the storage of the clean dishware, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) M stated, they have to have covers on them.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 4-903.11 Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles. (A) Except as specified in (D) of this section, cleaned EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS, laundered LINENS, and SINGLE-SERVICE and SINGLEUSE ARTICLES shall be stored: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where they are not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor. (B) Clean EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS shall be stored as specified under (A) of this section and shall be stored: (1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2675245. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a blood pressure medication was not available for four days for one (R121) of one resident reviewed for medication availability. Findings include: On 12/16/25 at 10:45 AM, an interview was conducted with R121 regarding her care in the facility. R121 reported her main concern was when she was admitted into the facility on [DATE], a prescribed medication used to treat high blood pressure was not available and she did not receive it until 12/15/25. R121 reported the nurse told her the medication had to be ordered from the pharmacy, but then there was no follow up after that. A review of an After Visit Summary from the hospital for R121 revealed they were prescribed candesartan-hydrochlorothiazide (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 32-12.5 milligrams (mg) daily. A review of the facility's Physician's Orders revealed an order for candesartan cilexetil-HCTZ…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate positioning and range of motion (restorative therapy services) for two (R71, R97) of three residents reviewed for positioning and range of motion. Findings include: R97 On 12/16/25 at 12:40 p.m., R97 was observed in their room in their hospital bed, wearing a hospital gown. R97 had soft positioning boots on their feet, which placed their feet into dorsiflexion (toes pointed up towards the ceiling). On 12/16/25 at 12:42 p.m., R97 reported they wanted to receive more range of motion exercises, however, said restorative therapy was only about once a week. R97 explained they wanted to receive more range of motion, especially for their feet, which felt tight. R97 stated sometimes staff had difficulty applying their positioning boots because their foot muscles were tight, which caused them discomfort. R97 said they wondered if range of motion exercises for their feet would help. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessment and monitoring for weight loss for one (R79) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include:On 12/17/2025 at 7:40 AM, 10:30 AM, and 1:00 PM, R79 was observed lying in bed, asleep and did not awaken when approached. At each of these observations an intravenous pole was stored next to the bed but did not have any fluids hung and/or being administered.12/17/2025 7:48 AM an interview was conducted with the resident's Nurse 'B'. When asked about R79's clinical status, Nurse 'B' reported the resident was currently declining clinically. When asked what that meant, Nurse 'B' further reported they were not eating or drinking, recently received intravenous fluids, and had skin breakdown.Review of the clinical record revealed R79 was initially admitted into the facility on 1/25/22 with diagnoses that included: localized swelling, mass and lump, right lower limb, osteoarthritis, hematemesis, Alzheimer's disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Complaint #2685171. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served according to resident preference for one (R122) of one resident reviewed for food, resulting in resident frustration. Findings include:On 12/16/25 at 12:30 PM, during an observation of the lunch meal in the 1 [NAME] dining area, R122 was observed seated at a table with a container of food that was pushed off to the side. R122 reported she was done eating lunch and she did not eat that food because I don't eat pigs. A slice of pork loin was observed in the container. R122 reported the facility kept serving her pork products and she told them she did not eat pigs. R122 reported the staff ordered her chicken tenders after she complained but did not understand why it was not noted to not serve the pork products in the first place. R122 reported that was not the first time and she had been served eggs that had a pork product mixed in before. A review of R122's meal ticket for the lunch meal on 12/16/25 revealed what R122 was served which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2575124.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively monitor residents' skin, identify new skin impairments in a timely manner, thoroughly assess and determine the root cause of new skin impairments, and implement treatment in a timely manner for two (R802 and R803) of three residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include:R802On 8/14/25 at 12:05 PM, R802 was observed lying in bed. R802 had a dressing dated 8/13/25 applied to the top part of her left lower leg. The skin surrounding the dressing was observed with dark, purple discoloration. When queried about what happened to her leg, R802 stated, Nothing exciting. R802 appeared confused with further questioning. On 8/14/25 at 2:06 PM, R802 was observed lying in bed on her back. When queried about when treatment is completed on her leg, R802 reported the wound nurse said she would do it at 2:30 PM. R803 said, Be ready for some screaming! and reported it was painful when the bandage was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes: MI00151714, MI00150739 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and comfortable environment, resulting in the potential to affect the entire resident population. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint of an allegation the facility failed to maintain a comfortable clean, homelike environment On 4/2/25 at 8:42 AM, The Second-floor hallway was observed with scattered white colored straw wrappers, crumbs, and debris. The floors in rooms 255, 252, 253, and 250 were observed with straw wrappers, moderate amounts of debris, and scattered crumbs of food. Dried red food matter was noted on the wall in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Partition curtains in rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were all observed soiled and unkempt. On 4/2/25 at 9:25 AM, A cabinet in the residential dining room of Dayroom [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a white clear bag containing red colored clothing and a red purse. RN A opened the bag which contained a red [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident food items brought in from the outside were labeled and dated resulting in the potential of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect all residents who store and consume food from the 2107 Dayroom community residential refrigerator. Findings include: On 4/2/25 at 9:10 AM, The refrigerator in Dayroom [ROOM NUMBER] was opened and the following items were observed no resident identifier or dates: A brown paper bag from (fast food restaurant), a black three compartment container with a clear lid containing cornbread, and a small clear container containing what appeared to be a white dressing located in the door section. The left bottom crisper revealed a white Styrofoam cup/lid containing a brown colored liquid. The freezer was observed storing a container of vanilla ice cream and a Styrofoam cup/lid with an unidentified frozen substance. Review of the facility policy titled Food Brought in by Others for Residents dated 3/2018…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00151450. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct accurate and thorough sepsis screening for one (R902) of one resident reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: A review of R902's clinical record revealed admission to the facility on 1/30/25 and R902 was discharged to the hospital on 3/10/25. Diagnoses included: metastatic cancer (prostate and bone), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic respiratory failure. A review of R902's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R902 had moderately impaired cognition. A review of the Progress Notes for R902 revealed they tested positive for influenza A on 3/1/25. A review of the Physician's Orders revealed R902 was placed on droplet precautions (isolation precautions used to prevent the spread of respiratory illnesses transmitted via droplets) from 3/5/25 through 3/12/25. The physician's orders indicated R902 was prescribed Tamiflu (an antiviral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00151450. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor the respiratory status of one (R902) of one resident reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed R902 was admitted into the facility on 1/30/25 and discharged to the hospital on 3/10/25. Diagnoses included: influenza A, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), metastatic cancer of the prostate spread to the bone, obstructive sleep apnea, and chronic respiratory failure. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R902 had moderately impaired cognition and did not require oxygen therapy on admission. A review of the Progress Notes revealed R902 tested positive for influenza A on 3/1/25. A review of the results of a chest X-ray for R902, completed on 3/5/25 revealed, Mild prominent bilateral hilar (wedge shaped middle portion of lungs) markings (may indicate inflammation or congestion). A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure potentially hazardous food items were properly cooled. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 10/28/24 between 8:45 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Director of Dining Services BB, the following items were observed: The handwashing sink located near the entry door to the kitchen, was observed with several gnats flying about. The trash can for the hand sink was observed with no liner, and when the lid was opened, numerous gnats flew out of the can. There were gnats observed in various other areas of the kitchen as well. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 6-501.111 Controlling Pests, The PREMISES shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the PREMISES by: .4. (D) Eliminating harborage conditions. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Social Worker on a full time basis to meet psychosocial, mental and behavioral heath care needs of residents resulting in the potential for unmet needs. Findings include: During the recertification survey conducted from 10/28/24 - 10/30/24, multiple concerns were identified in regard to the facility's social work practices, including mood/behavior management, psychotropic medication, psychosocial assessments, and processes for completion of advance directives and coordination of decision-makers. On 10/29/24 at 8:00 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), when asked if Staff 'D' was the only Social Worker, the DON reported they were. On 10/29/24 at 8:38 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff 'D'. They reported they had worked in their role as a Social Worker since the end of January 2024, but had been with the company since 2023. When asked if there were any other Social Workers Staff 'D' reported they were by themselves. When asked if they were licensed as a Social Worker Staff 'D'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices during wound care and implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (R70) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injuries, and ensure adequate infection control practices and implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents on droplet precautions for two (R23 and R333) of two residents observed for transmission-based precautions related to COVID-19, resulting in the increased potential for wound contamination, delayed healing, and spread of infection. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 10/9/2023: Enhanced Barrier Precautions expand the use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) beyond situations in which exposure to blood and body fluids is anticipated and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs (Multi Drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were easily accessible and within reach for three (R7, R8 and R333) of four residents reviewed for call light placement, resulting in the inability to summons help when needed. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Call Light, Answering dated 12/19/2023: .When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call lights is within easy reach of the resident . R8 On 10/28/24 at 11:06 AM, R8 was observed laying in bed, pulling at the hospital gown they wore. The room was observed to be warmer in temperature and when asked if they were hot, R8 replied, Uh huh. The call light was observed out of reach, draped across the end of the footboard of the bed. On 10/29/24 at 7:42 AM, R8 was observed laying in bed on their back, asleep. The call light was tucked behind the wall and lower end of the bottom of the mattress completely out of reach near the footboard. Review of the clinical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate protocols to change residents' treatment preferences for code status for three (R32, R52 and R63) of four residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: R32 On [DATE] at 10:15 AM, R32 was observed lying in bed. R32 was able to engage in conversation, but appeared slightly confused as R32 reported being hungry while having their breakfast tray in front of them, partially eaten. A review of R32's clinical record revealed R32 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's Disease. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed R32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an evaluation to assist in determining a person's cognitive status) score of six which indicated R32 had severely impaired cognition (A score of 0-7 indicates severely impaired cognition). A review of R32's resident profile in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R32's code status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin administration was performed according to professional nursing standards of practice for one (R332) of one residents reviewed. Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 10:27 AM, R332 was observed sitting up in bed. R332 expressed concern regarding getting their breakfast tray late (which they defined as 9AM or later) and receiving their AM insulin dose hours before. They reported this has been happening since their arrival to the facility. On 10/29/24 at 10:09 AM, R332 reported receiving her breakfast tray that morning around 9:00 AM. Review of the clinical record revealed R332 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. A review of the administration times (provided by the facility) for R332's morning dose of Humalog insulin revealed the following administration times: 10/26/24 at 6:23 AM, 10/27/24 at 5:32 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and determine the root cause of bilateral arm bruising for one (R37) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 12:23 PM, R37 was observed seated in a wheelchair, sleeping, in the dining room of the 3 North unit. R37's left arm was exposed and revealed three small fading circular purple discolorations to the left lower arm under the elbow and a larger discolored area on the top of the left lower arm that resembled a bruise. A review of R37's clinical record revealed R37 was admitted into the facility on 5/22/24 with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease. A review of R37's progress notes revealed no documentation of any recent skin impairments. A review of R37's care plans revealed no care plans related to bruising easily. A review of R37's Physician's Orders revealed R37 was not prescribed any medications that put R37 at higher risk of bleeding and bruising (blood thinners). A review of R37's weekly skin assessments revealed no documentation of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely coordinate vision services for one (R6) of one resident reviewed for vision services. Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 10:09 AM, R6 was observed sitting up in bed. R6 reported that their glasses were lost prior to admission to the facility and that they only have reading glasses, which they were observed wearing. R6 reported being without their glasses since July and that the facilities social worker was aware. R6 further stated that they have been getting headaches and eye pain, is unable to read what is on the television, and cannot play bingo. On 10/29/24 at 12:16 PM, social services employee D was queried about their involvement in and knowledge of R6 being without prescription glasses. Social services employee D reported they were recently asked to place R6 on the ancillary services list but not specifically for vision services. Social services employee D reported that vision services providers are in house once per quarter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement preventative pressure ulcer interventions and administer treatment according to physician's orders for one (R70) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 9:46 AM, R70 was observed laying in bed on their back, asleep and their right hand was observed with tremors. The mattress was observed to be a low air loss mattress. Their feet were observed tucked under a brightly colored fleece blanket directly covering their lower extremities (added pressure to the tips of the feet/toes). There were no pressure-relieving boots observed in use, or available for use in the room. The bedside table was observed to have a small Styrofoam disposable tray with several wound care supplies which included: a bandage that was dated 10-27-24 [Nurse G's initials redacted]; a small wood stick still in plastic; a small four ounce cup with gauze and clear liquid; and a small medicine cup with a honey-like substance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements (DPS). DPS#1 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide fresh water at bedside, within reach, and offer it throughout the shift for two (R8 and R63) of six residents reviewed for hydration, resulting in the potential for continued dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Water Distribution to Residents dated 12/15/2023: .Each resident will have their own styrofoam cup and straw labeled with name and date each day .Each resident's cup will be filled with water each shift and more frequently unless medically contraindicated .Outdated cups will be disposed of each day on midnight shift .It shall be the responsibility of the Director of Nursing, and the Nursing Management team to ensure that clean, fresh water is given to all residents on a 24-hour basis according to the above policy. R8 On 10/28/24 at 11:06 AM, R8 was observed laying in bed, pulling at the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (R32 and R70) of two residents reviewed for pain, were assessed, treated, and interventions implemented timely to prevent unnecessary pain. Findings include: R32 On 10/28/24 at 10:52 AM, R32's door was observed to be closed. R32 was heard yelling and crying loudly and uncontrollably from the hallway. Upon entrance to R32's room, R32 was observed seated in a shower chair with an open seat, wrapped in towels. R32 yelled, It hurts! It hurts! and was yelling to get out of the shower chair. At that time, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'B' left the room to get Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'C' to assist with transferring R32 into the bed. R32 was interviewed and reported pain where I sit and said she wanted out of the chair. At 11:04 AM, R32 was heard from the hallway behind a closed door yelling out and crying. At approximately 11:07 AM, LPN 'A' entered R32's room where CNA 'B' and LPN 'C' were located. At 11:15 AM, R32 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services which effectively monitored, identified, and implemented individualized treatment and behavioral interventions for a resident receiving psychotropic medication for one (R70) of four residents reviewed for social services. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Bio-Psycho-Social Wellness Program dated 11/14/16: .Identify and refer residents displaying difficult behaviors to the Social Worker .The Social Worker will review the resident's chart, focusing on factors in the following order: a. Physiological factors b. Environmental factors c. Psychiatric factors .Revise all approaches as necessary .Review resident's progress: monthly, if behavior is monitored via Point of Care documentation .quarterly, if mood is monitored via the PHQ-9 depression Test .per psychiatric evaluation; or .per supportive therapy session .Once mood/behavior is stable, review resident's mood/behavior within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly drug regimen reviews conducted by the consultant pharmacist were reviewed by the medical provider for recommendations to act upon for two (R51, R44) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R51 A review of R51's drug regimen reviews revealed the Consultant Pharmacist reviewed R51's medications on 3/8/24 and 4/8/24 and 7/3/24 noted irregularities or recommendations. A review of R51's clinical record revealed no report that indicated what the identified irregularities or recommendations were. On 10/30/24 at 1:12 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide the documentation of recommendations made by the pharmacist on the above dates for R51. On 10/30/24 at 4:01 PM, the DON reported the pharmacist's recommendations from 3/8/24, 4/8/24, and 7/3/24 were not reviewed by the medical provider and provided the following: A Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 3/8/24 that noted, (R51) receives a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide justification for the use of antipsychotic medications with residents with dementia, identify targeted behaviors and symptoms, develop and implement individualized non-pharmacological interventions, and monitor for continued use for one (R37) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R37 On 10/28/24 at approximately 10:05 AM, R37 was observed in bed sleeping. At 11:19 AM, R37 remained sleeping in bed. At 12:23 PM, R37 was observed sleeping in a wheelchair in the dining room of the 3 North Unit. At 2:32 PM, R37 was observed sleeping in a wheelchair in the dining room. On 10/29/24 at approximately 11:50 AM, R37 was observed sleeping in a wheelchair in the dining room. At 2:39 PM, R37 was observed sleeping in the wheelchair in the dining room. A review of R37's clinical record revealed R37 was admitted into the facility on 5/22/24 with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's Disease, psychotic disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two (R28 and R52) of four residents whose clinical records were reviewed for advance directives, resulting in the increased potential for delayed and/or omitted involvement of the resident/legal representative in decision making regarding medical directives, and conflicting physician/extender documentation of medical directives. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Advance Care Planning dated [DATE]: .During the intake assessment or rooming procedure, a healthcare team member looks for Advance Directive .When a patient has indicated that they have an Advance Directive, this is noted in the Electronic Health Record .and a copy is requested for the patient's record. DPOAH (Durable Power of Attorney for Health) cannot be followed without a copy being present in the patient's medical record .[Facility name redacted] employees that are not on the care team may sign the OOH (Out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure sanitary practices during food service for two residents (R20 and R55) as well maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen which has the potential to effect all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 12/3/23 between 8:45 AM-10:00 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed with Chef L 1. A tray of bacon was observed in the walk-in refrigerator unsealed without any opened or used by date. 2. A ham was wrapped in plastic wrap with no opened or used by date. 3. Three containers of chicken were observed thawing in refrigerator without a use by date or received date on the container. 4. The reach in refrigerator was observed to contain a bowl of egg salad and a bowl of tuna salad which were both undated. 5. Dried hanging utensils were observed to contain a white substance on them. 6. The hot box, oven and steam machine were all observed to have food debris with dried grease covering the tops of the appliances. 7. Multiple drain flies were observed in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified treatment for four residents (R#'s 2, 32, 39, and 47) of four residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Quality of Life: Dignity dated 7/19/23 was reviewed and read, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality . 12/4/23 from 8:50 AM until 9:30 AM, and from 12:40 PM until 1:15 PM, observations of the breakfast and lunch meals were conducted. R#'s 2, 32, 39, and 37 were observed in the 3 North dining room and were observed to need one-to-one assistance with dining. During the observations, Certified Nurse Aide 'N' and Nurse 'M' were overheard multiple times to refer to residents who needed one-to-one dining assistance as feeders. On 12/4/23 at approximately 3:45 PM, the dining observations and use of the term feeder were shared with the facility's acting Director of Nursing and they indicated that it was not appropriate to use that term.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, safe, and home-like environment to ensure that resident room floors, windows, and common area windows were clean and in good repair affecting multiple residents (R4, 54, 70, 78) and Resident Rooms 202, 243, 309 and 353 throughout the facility resulting in an unclean physical environment, resident dissatisfaction, and complaints regarding the lack of cleanliness and drafty windows. Findings include: R4 R4 was recently re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospitalization. R4 was a long-term resident of the facility and had been at the facility since 7/23/2018. R4's admitting diagnoses included stroke with right hemiplegia (right sided weakness), urinary retention, dysphagia (difficulty or inability to swallow), and heart failure. R4 was receiving nutrition through a PEG (feeding tube - Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube in which a tube is placed into a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall, most commonly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to timely implement wound care treatment as ordered by the wound practitioner for one (R49) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 12/3/23 at 11:51 AM, R49 was observed sitting in their wheelchair at a table in the community room with a book in their hand. A brief interview was conducted with the resident at that time. Review of the medical record revealed R49 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's disease, dementia, and the need for assistance with personal care. Further review of the medical record revealed R49 developed a stage III pressure wound to the coccyx area while residing in the facility. Review of a Nurses Note dated 1/9/23 at 6:41 PM, documented in part . resident stated to that nurse she had an area on her bottom. Nurse assessed the area, then asked writer to look at it. Resident stated she doesn't know when she started feeling as if something was on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement (QAPI) program failed to identify a repeated issue regarding the facility's prescribing and implementation of unnecessary psychotropic medications (R12 and R60), the QA committee/program failed to identify this issue and implement their QAPI plan to address the repeated psychotropic concerns, potentially affecting the health, safety, and quality of life for all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's CASPER report revealed the facility was cited for Unnecessary Psychotropic Medications in 2018, 2021, 2022 and again in 2023. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews R's 12 & 60 were identified to have been prescribed unnecessary psychotropic medications for the 2023 survey. On 12/5/23 at 10:31 AM, a meeting was held with the facility's Administrator to discuss the priority and ongoing issues that the facility's Quality Assurance committee had identified and was working on to improve. The Administrator verbalized various areas…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a self-administration assessment was completed for one (R68) of one resident reviewed for medications observed at the bedside. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and acute cystitis. On 12/3/23 at 9:10 AM, R68 was observed sleeping in bed. Observed on R68's bedside table was a tube of hydrocortisone cream maximum strength and two containers of nystatin powder. Review of the medical record revealed no assessment completed for the resident to self-administer their hydrocortisone and Nystatin medications. On 12/3/23 at 2:50 PM, the Infection Control Nurse (ICN) A (who also covered as the Director Of Nursing - DON- for the survey) was asked to come in R68's room. Once in the room, ICN A observed the hydrocortisone cream and two nystatin containers and removed all of the medications from R68's room. When asked ICN A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal choices were honored for one (R70) resident reviewed for choices. Findings include: On 12/3/23 at 9:24 AM, R70 was observed in bed watching TV. An observation of the room was made and the TV closest to the door was very loud. An interview was conducted with R70 to see if the care being rendered at the facility was that of satisfaction, however R70 stated that due to the loud volume of roommates television he was unable to hear. R70 stated that he can't even think most of the time, and stated that their physical well-being has improved but the mental and emotional part is a struggle. R70 was asked if they ever made a complaint about the volume of roommate's television to anyone, R70 explained that they had to several people but no one has addressed it. Record review revealed that R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of vascular dementia, muscle wasting atrophy and polyneuropathy, had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure services provided consistently met professional standards of nursing practice for one (R333) of one resident reviewed for nursing services. Findings include: On 12/3/23 at 9:47 AM, R333 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in their room. R333 complained of their eyes being irritated and uncomfortable. R333 stated they told the nurse earlier that they needed their eye drops. R333 stated in part . the nurse gives it (eye drops) whatever time she wants to . A few minutes later the nurse (later identified as Registered Nurse - RN F) entered the room with a breakfast tray for R333's roommate. Before RN F exited the room, RN F was asked if they were the nurse for R333 and RN F replied they were. RN F was then informed of R333's complaints of eye discomfort and irritation and stated, R333's eye drops were scheduled. RN F was asked if the eye drops were scheduled to be given this morning and RN F stated no, the eye drops were not due at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and appropriate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for one (R4) of one Resident reviewed for ADL care with potential for negative physical, psychosocial outcomes, and potential loss of dignity for residents who are dependent on staff for assistance. Findings include: A facility provided document titled, Quality of Care, dated 6/15/23, read in part, (Facility Name Omitted) will provide or arrange for the provision of necessary care and services to attain or maintain practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents in accordance with the Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care subject to the resident's right of Self-Determination. A. Activities of Daily Living 1.By provision of treatment and services, that an individual resident's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) does not diminish, except as the unavoidable consequence of the resident's condition. Such ADLs include, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a left hand splint was applied for one resident (R20) of one resident reviewed for positioning/mobility. Findings include: On 12/03/23 at approximately 10:02 a.m., R20 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R20 was observed to have a contracture of their left hand. No splint/brace was observed to be applied. R20 was queried if the staff had recently put any splints on their hand and they reported that they sometimes do, but it has been a while and the staff probably forgot. On 12/4/23 at approximately 8:47 a.m., R20 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R20's left hand was not observed to contain any brace/splints. R20 was queried if anyone had recently applied their splint and they reported nobody had put it on. R20 was queried if they knew where the brace was and they reported they did not. On 12/4/23 at approximately 10:53 a.m., R20 was observed in their wheelchair, in the common area and did not have any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate resident supervision was provided for two residents (R52 and R71) of four residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R52 On 12/3/23 at approximately 10:08 a.m., R52 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R52 was queried if they had any concerns with their care in the facility and they reported that R71 wanders into their room almost daily and takes their things and touches all their stuff and they have to yell out for help so the staff can remove them. R71 On 12/03/23 at approximately 9:40 a.m., R71 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R71 was observed to have their bed next to the wall with a fall mat on the other side with a wander guard on their ankle. On 12/4/23 at approximately 10:54 a.m., R71 was observed in their room, dressed and sitting on regular chair in the middle of room. Multiple other rooms on R71's hall were noted to have their doors open. On 12/4/23 at approximately 11:59…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and/or report medications prescribed/administered in excessive doses and durations for one (R12) resident reviewed of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications resulting in the potential for prolonged use of medications. Findings include: On 12/3/23 at 8:45 AM, R12 in room lying in bed an interview was attempted but due to R12 cognition it was not effectively conducted. A record review revealed that R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the medical diagnosis of vascular dementia, muscle weakness, anxiety disorders with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 3 (indicating a severely impaired cognition) dated for 11/17/23. A further review of the record, revealed that R12 was ordered Clonazepam 0.5 milligrams(mg) 1 tab by mouth 3 times a day for anxiety on 9/13/21, and was prescribed Clonazepam 0.5 mg 1 tab by mouth every 6 hours as needed (PRN) on 9/22/23 with an end date of 12/21/23. There was a request made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medication orders were written with a stop date, resident centered target behaviors were identified, and non-pharmaceutical interventions were implemented prior to the use of as needed psychotropic medications for two residents (R#'s 60 and 12) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A request for a policy for behavior monitoring and as needed use of psychotropic medications was made, however; the facility only provided an untitled, undated piece of paper with three typed lines that read, PRN (as needed) Antipsychotics are written for 14 days and evaluated by Psych. Discontinued if non-use <sic> If being used a new order is written by Psych for 14 days. On 12/4/23 at approximately 1:15 PM, R60 was observed seated at their bedside preparing to eat lunch. R60 appeared calm, quiet, and carried on casual, appropriate conversation. On 12/4/23 at 2:09 PM, a review of R60's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the ordered altered diet to one resident (R63) during medication administration resulting in the potential for aspiration. Findings include: On 12/3/2023 at 08:51 AM, Registered Nurse G was observed for medication administration task. During medication preparation for R63, this surveyor observed granulated powered MiraLAX (medication used to treat occasional constipation) mixed with water dispensed from a carafe on the medication cart into a clear plastic cup with a white plastic straw. On 12/3/2023 at approximately 09:00 AM, this surveyor observed RN G administer R63 prepared MiraLAX from a clear plastic cup with a white plastic straw. R63 demonstrated difficulty swallowing as evidenced by a frequent wet audible cough. R63 also demonstrated periodic facial movements imitating chewing in-between coughing. It was observed while R63 was coughing, RN G gently rubbed the back and right shoulder of R63 and verbalized, Just take your time, it is OK. Record review on 12/4/2023 of the Active Order Summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-12-05 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staff postings were updated daily and reflected the staffing at the facility potentially affecting all residents and visitors at the facility. Findings include: On 12/3/23 at approximately 8:27 a.m., A review of the facility's daily Nursing staffing posting was reviewed and revealed a staffing posting dated 12/1/23. At that time, receptionist at the entrance was queried who was responsible for maintaining the updated staffing posting and they reported it was the staffing coordinator who does not work on weekends. On 12/05/23 at approximately 9:09 a.m., an interview with the facility staffing coordinator K (SC K) was conducted. SC K was queried regarding the incorrect daily staffing posting dated 12/1/23 observed on 12/3/23 and they reported they update the postings during the week and that the weekend postings should be updated by the Nursing supervisors on the weekends. SC K indicated that the Saturday and Sunday Nursing supervisors forgot to post the updated staffing posting. On 12/5/23 a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-49.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 9%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$570per resident / day
operating cost
$17,333per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$380per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235462. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next