Maples Benzie County Medical Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 78.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.33 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) 2611699.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and mitigate environmental hazards, ensure the appropriate use of assistive devices, and implement care planned interventions resulting in falls for three Residents (#24, #25, #26) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm when Resident #24 sustained multiple lower leg fractures requiring surgical intervention. Findings include:Resident #24 (R24)Review of R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 8/4/23 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and personality disorder. Review of R24's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/5/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated R24 was independent in walking distances up to 150 feet and transferring from a bed to chair.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, discard, and label medication in two of two medication rooms and one of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage.Findings include:On [DATE] at 9:45 AM, an observation was made of the medication cart on the 300-hall and was found to have one insulin pen with an opened date and without a discard date.On [DATE] at 9:50 AM, an observation made of the medication room on the 300 hall and found to have one opened tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) solution, 1 ml vial, lot #87891, and expiration date 2/2027 without an opened date. On [DATE] at 10:00 AM, an observation was made as this Surveyor exited the 300-hall medication room of Registered Nurse (RN) N who was administering medications to a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] with her back turned to her medication cart. The medication cart was unsecured and unlocked until 10:05 AM. The 300-hall housed 20 residents in the unit, of which 18 had a diagnosis of dementia.An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience based on the reasonable personal concept for two Residents (#47 and #33) of eighteen residents reviewed for resident rights.Findings include:Resident #47 (R47)Review of R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 5/16/19 with diagnoses including dementia, diabetes, and long-term use of insulin. Review of, Section C: Cognitive Patterns in R47's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/24/25, ranked R47's, Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making as, Severely impaired-never/rarely made decisions.On 1/12/2026 at approximately 12:20 PM, R47 was observed in the dining room with 16 other residents preparing to consume the midday meal. At approximately 12:31 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) J approached R47 in the dining room, lifted her shirt to expose her abdomen, and administered an injection in her stomach without providing privacy.Resident #33 (R33)Review of R33's EMR revealed initial admission to the facility on 1/19/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notifications of the reason for hospital transfers to residents/responsible parties and document information communicated to the receiving hospital for three Residents (R3, R13, and R49) of four residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include:Resident #3 (R3) was transferred to the hospital emergency department (ED) on 10/20/25. There was no documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicating a written notification of transfer was provided to R3 or R3's resident representative. The EMR of R3 did not include documentation of information communicated or provided to the receiving hospital when R3 was transferred on 10/20/25. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Clinical Coordinator Registered Nurse (RN) L were interviewed on 1/13/25 at 3:32 PM. The DON said information conveyed to the hospital when a resident was transferred to the hospital would be in a progress note in the EMR. The EMR of R3 was reviewed with the DON.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document clinical assessment of changes of condition for two Residents (#3 & #15) of 18 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:Resident #3 (R3) During an interview on 1/12/26 at 2:33 PM, R3 said he was sent to the hospital several times since being admitted to the facility. R3 was unable to recall the reasons for the hospitalizations but said he was admitted to the hospital for a week in October (2025) because of diabetes. The electronic medical record (EMR) of R3 disclosed admission to the facility on 4/26/18. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R3 had intact cognition. The MDS assessment indicated R3 had a diagnosis of diabetes, received daily injections of insulin, and was at risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Further review of the MDS revealed R3 received antibiotics for an active diagnosis of septicemia (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 01/12/2026 at 11:45 AM During a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager C, a fresh turkey still in the wrap was noted in a tray on the prep table. When asked what was happening with the turkey, Chef D stated it was thawed in advance and was getting ready to be cooked for a later meal. Chef D pulled out a probe thermometer and stabbed the turkey with the probe to get an internal temperature reading. After noting the temperature, he wiped the probe off with an alcohol wipe and put the cap back on the probe thermometer. When asked if since this probe was placed into an uncooked turkey, should it have been washed, rinsed and then sanitized prior to recapping and storage, Chef D pulled the thermometer out of the tray and went and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This deficient practice pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) 2573015.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the care plan to prevent falls for one Resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards and supervision.Findings include:Resident #3 (R3):Review of R3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 1/31/25 with diagnoses including dementia, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, and repeated falls. Review of R3's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation, dated 8/5/25, revealed a score of 3, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Review of the FRI documentation submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed the following: [R3] had a fall on 7/25/25 at 1952 [7:52 PM]. Noted to have a hematoma [bruise] above right eye. upon review it is noted that no one saw the incident occur. He [R3] was observed on the floor after the event. he [R3] has poor impulse control and severe cognitive impairment. Noted prior intervention to not leave resident on toilet without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 77 residents of the facility. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at approximately 11:49 AM, observations in the Oak dining room were conducted. A stainless steel pan was observed sitting on an ice base, filled with a green liquid like substance. The temperature of the food was measured and found to be 48°F. An interview with Food Service Worker (FSW) I was conducted at this time, who stated the product was pureed salad. FSW I was requested to measure the temperature of the food with a facility thermometer. FSW I removed a thermometer from an adjacent drawer, and without any attempt to sanitize the probe of the thermometer, placed it in the food. FSW I was observed to push the thermometer stem to the bottom of the steel pan and reported a temperature of 39°F. FSW I was then asked to retract the thermometer somewhat so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement revised care plan interventions for falls sustained by one Resident (#67) of three residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for potential for additional falls and potential for subsequent injury. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 12:30 PM, Resident #67 (R67) was observed on the 400 unit sitting in a recliner in the living room area. R67 had a tab alarm device placed on them (Device used to alert caregivers, should R67 attempt to rise from the recliner without assistance). Review of R67's medical record revealed admission to the facility on 5/1/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke-occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked, or otherwise disrupted, causing brain tissue to die), aphasia (affects a person's ability to understand and/or express themselves), and dementia. Review of R67's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 8/6/24, revealed R67 scored a 2/15 on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary storage of respiratory equipment for two Residents (#19 and #20) of two residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: Resident #20 (R20) Review of R20's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 2/27/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Parkinson's Disease. Review of R20's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/3/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. Review of R20's EMR revealed the following pharmacy order: Ipatropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 mg/mL (milligrams/milliliter): inhale orally two times a day (between 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM and again between 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM) for wheezing. On 12/2/24 at 11:36 AM, R20 was observed sleeping in a wheelchair in her private room. A nebulizer (a medical device which turns liquid medication into a very fine mist that can be inhaled through a face mask or mouthpiece) was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment for one Resident (#27) of one resident reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice resulted in increased difficulty with independent eating. Findings include: Resident #27 (R27) Review of R27's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and limitations of activity due to disability. Review of R27's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/10/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15, indicative of a moderate cognitive impairment. On 12/2/24 at 11:53 AM, R27 was observed eating their lunch meal in bed. R27 was utilizing a stainless-steel fork and demonstrated difficulties with independent feeding due to a noticeable tremor of his right hand. Noodles were observed spilling onto R27's chest due to the tremor. On 12/2/24 at 3:22 PM, a phone interview was conducted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $269K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI