Canal View - Houghton County

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 197 beds and averages 131.7 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.25 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.13 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.49 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00141290. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement which resulted in the likelihood of serious harm, injury, impairment, or death to one Resident (R102) out of one resident reviewed for safety and supervision. Review of the facility Investigation Summary Conclusion: [R102] exited the main door of Woodland Haven (secured Alzheimer's unit) unattended . [R102] was observed to have exited the (main entrance) of the building .He was outside of the building for a total of one minute and thirty-four seconds . Review of R102's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/13/23, revealed R102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with current, active diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's dementia, and depression. R102 scored 5 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of severely impaired cognition. R102 was independent with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate toileting assistance to prevent a fall, for one Resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with major injury, including fractured facial bones and subdural hematoma. Findings include: This deficiency pertains to Intake 2625013,Review of R2's Electronic Medical Record, revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included the following, in part: Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia with agitation, dementia with anxiety, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, stiffness of right hip, stiffness of left hip, and stiffness of right knee. R2 score 0/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) performed in August of 2025, reflective of severe cognitive impairment.Review of the Incident Report dated 9/14/25 at 1545 (3:45 p.m.), revealed the following: .Incident Description: . CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) called this nurse into common…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142963. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for one Resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. This deficient practice resulted in hospitalization for a right, lower leg fracture. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of the history and physical from the hospital dated 2/16/24, revealed R1 experienced pain in her leg and then transferred to hospital where an X-ray was performed on right knee. Review of progress note from the hospital records dated 2/17/24, stated R1 sustained a fracture of the proximal tibial metadiaphysis fracture near the knee in the larger of the two bones in the lower leg. The report also stated R1 was in pain despite the use of Morphine and Roxicodone (Oxycodone). Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) Investigative Summary dated 2/15/24, at 10:07 a.m , revealed Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA) D and CNA E entered the room of R1 to assist with a transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing of a pressure injury and prevent the development of an additional pressure injury for one resident (R73) of two residents reviewed for wounds. This deficient practice resulted in harm when R73 developed a stage 3 pressure injury to the coccyx in addition to an existing facility-acquired pressure injury on the coccyx. Findings include: Resident 73 (R73) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: need for assistance with personal care, contracture of the right shoulder, contracture of the left shoulder, dependence on wheelchair, symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, catatonic schizophrenia, dementia with psychotic disturbance, and others. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded R73 as not having any pressure injuries. The MDS assessed R73 with functional limitation in range of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 1/26/2026 at 1:45 PM, during initial kitchen walk through with Dietary Data Tech D, an open container of sour cream was observed in an upright cooler. Written in marker on the outside of the container was Sour Cream O with a slash mark through the O (for date opened) 1/25/26, then below that X 2-18-26 for a total of 25 days. Dietary Data tech D stated the last date X was the date the product was to be thrown out.On 1/26/2026 at 3:40 PM, a bag of milk was observed in the bulk milk dispenser in the 1st floor kitchen dining area with a dispose by date sticker of 2/3/26, which is a total of 8 days since it was opened. Per Dietary Manager (DM) A this milk was placed in the unit that day (1/26/2026).On 1/27/2026 at 8:25 AM, while on kitchen tour with DM A and Dietician C, the 2 door Hoshizaki reach-in upright cooler was observed with a bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that environmental equipment utilized by residents was maintained in a manner that allowed equipment to be appropriately cleaned and sanitized for seven Residents (#34, #120, #103, #11, #18, #53, & #138) of eight residents reviewed for a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. Findings include:Resident #34 (R34) On 1/26/26 at 3:13 PM, R34 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The wheelchair had black tape wrapped around the entire perimeter of the hand rims (circular component on the outside of a wheelchair's wheels that allow users to grip and turn the rims to propel the wheelchair forward) on both sides of the wheelchair. The tape was visibly soiled and noted to be frayed in several places along the perimeter of the hand rims. R34 was asked the reason the black tape encompassed the hand rims of her wheelchair. R34 said the tape had been present for months but she did not know the reason the tape was applied. When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0810 — pattern
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment for six Residents (#82, #26, #33, #59, #16 & #115) of seven residents reviewed for adaptive dining equipment needs.Findings include: Resident #82 (R82)During the breakfast meal service on 1/27/2026 at 8:52 AM, R82 was observed with a meal tray card indicating a need for adaptive equipment including 2-Handled Spout Cups. R82 did have these adapted cups for two of her beverages but did not for two other beverages. The tray card also indicated a need for Flat Handled [NAME] or [NAME] Utensils. She received regular silverware wrapped in a napkin.During an interview on 1/27/26 at approximately 9:30 AM, R82 confirmed the 2-handled cups were much easier for her to use. She pointed to the beverages in her room on her bedside table in these 2-handled cups.The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R82 included a quarterly nutritional assessment dated [DATE] which read in part: Resident is able to feed herself…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent worsening and the development of a pressure ulcer for one Resident (Resident #53) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcer development.Findings include:Resident #53 (R53)Review of R53's face sheet revealed an admission to the facility on 8/5/25, with diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and depression.R53's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/21/25, included Section M Skin which revealed R53 had a risk for developing pressure ulcers.The facility matrix disclosed R53 had developed a facility acquired pressure ulcer stage III which was not present on admission.On 1/27/26 at 10:37 AM, wound care was observed performed on R53 by contracted Physical Therapist (PT) / Wound Care Specialist (WCS) P. R53's pressure ulcer was located on her right sacral area and was circular in shape with some redness of the surrounding skin area. R53 did not have an air mattress on her bed. R53 was wearing an incontinence brief.Review of R53's wound clinic progress note, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use foot pedals to safely propel three wheelchair dependent Residents (#33, #115 and #126) of five residents reviewed for safe wheelchair mobility. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33)On 1/27/2026 at 7:56 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) I was observed transporting R33 into the dining room from the hall. R33 had her feet scraping the floor as CNA I pushed the resident forward. R33 continued to propel herself out of the dining room and at 7:58 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) J redirected R33 by pushing her toward R33's room. No foot pedals were used and R33's feet dragged on the floor as she was pushed. R33 continued to propel herself and then RN J transported R33 back to the dining room, again without using foot pedals.On 1/27/2026 at 8:58 AM, CNA I was observed pushing R33 out of the dining room. CNA I said, Hold your feet up but R33's feet dragged on floor as her wheelchair did not have foot pedals.Resident #115 (R115)On 1/27/2026 at 8:00 AM, CNA H was observed transporting R115 into the dining room from the hall.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intake 2574829.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide comfort care based on the individual's personalized care plans, for one Resident (R1) of one resident reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in unaddressed anxiety and fear related to shortness of breath during the dying process. Findings include: Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnoses that included the following, in part: cancer, septicemia, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure, parainfluenza virus pneumonia and pulmonary embolism. R1 Scored 14 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition. The Resident (R1) was placed on Hospice on [DATE] and remained as her own responsible party for medical decisions until [DATE], the day of the Resident's death. An abbreviated survey was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate interventions were in place to prevent a burn for one Resident #70 (R70) of ten residents reviewed for burns resulting in the potential for further burns, pain and disfigurement. Findings include: Resident #70 (R70) Review of R70's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 7/20/20, with active diagnoses that included: coronary artery disease, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. R70 scored a 7 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of severe cognitive impairment. Review of facility incident notes, read in part . per video review of the day 10/25/24 .R70 was seating in the dining tower for supper. R70 was observed picking up a bowl from the table and holding it over her chest while spooning something into her mouth. R70 puts the spoon and bowl back on the table and began to fan the clothing protector that was on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate pain management for one Resident (#30) of two residents reviewed for pain management resulting in R30 experiencing uncontrolled pain during a routine dressing change. Findings include: Resident 30 (R30) Review of R30's face sheet revealed the following diagnosis: low back pain. Review of R30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/4/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment of 9 (0-15) indicating moderately impaired cognition. R30 had no rejections of care, was dependent on staff for all cares except substantial/maximal assistance for upper body dressing, and had an unhealed pressure ulcer, not present on admission. Review of R30's Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR), revealed the following, Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) Oral Solution 20 MG/ML (milligrams per milliliters) Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for pain . (5 mg) . Review of R30's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), revealed the following, Pressure injuries to coccyx:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expiration dates were present on multi-dose medications and biologicals and failed to remove expired medications from the active supply in one medication cart of four medication carts reviewed, resulting in the potential for administration of expired medications and biologicals and the potential to have a reduced medication effect. Findings include: A review of the 200 Hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C on 11/19/2024 at 1:54 p.m. revealed the following: A multi-dose Trelegy Ellipta (inhaled medication used to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) 200-62.5-25 MCG (microgram) inhaler with 22 doses out of 30 doses remaining. Further review of the inhaler and the box housing the inhaler revealed no date indicating when the medication was first opened or when the medication would expire. An open insulin aspart (rapid-acting insulin) FlexPen with 75 units out of 100 units remaining. The insulin pen and the clear plastic bag housing the pen contained no legible date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize appropriate dementia care techniques in the provision of care and services to one Resident (R3) of three residents reviewed for dementia care. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for escalation of behaviors by use of physical force to ensure resident complied with staff care. Findings include: This deficiency pertains to Complaint Intake #MI00143128, which alleged facility staff were being physically aggressive and neglectful of R3 while residing in the facility locked Alzheimer's unit. Observation of surveillance video, in the presence of IT (Information Technology) Director (Staff) E showed the following staff/resident (R3) interactions: 12/16/2023: At 4:39 p.m., R3 had fallen asleep in a straight-backed chair. He was leaning forward as he was sleeping. At 4:40 p.m., two unidentified facility staff members (unknown names) grabbed R3 underneath the armpits (one on each side) and dragged him forcibly across the floor. R3 appeared to be resisting the move, as his feet were out in front of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,988 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $24,395 — penalty dated 2024-03-06
• $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-08
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-05 for 49 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $179K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI