Jackson County Medical Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 234 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 194 beds and averages 181.2 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.45 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.57 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2712733Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R2) right to be free from neglect resulting in a fall with staff and suffering a fractured right humerus. Findings Include: Review of Resident #2 (R2) clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R2 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnosis of dementia. R2 scored 6 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of R2's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated R2 was at high risk for falls.Review of R2's comprehensive care plan for the Activity of Daily Living (ADL) dated 11/23/25 revealed R2 required 2 staff persons for transfers using a mechanical lift assistive device stand-up lift. Review of R2's Kardex (a care guide used by Certified Nursing Assistants) that was in place on 12/26/25 revealed and confirmed that R2 required 2 staff persons for transfers using a stand-up lift. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 12/05/23 at 09:35 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a trash receptacle for disposal of contaminated personal protective equipment (PPE) inside the room, near the door. There was no lid on the trash receptacle. The discarded, contaminated PPE was nearing the top of the receptacle. On 12/05/23 at 09:21 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a trash receptacle for disposal of contaminated PPE in the bathroom. There was no lid on the trash receptacle. The discarded, contaminated PPE was nearing the top of the receptacle. On 12/06/23 during the lunch meal 2 unidentified staff were observed on unit 4, neither staff were observed to have worn the face shield that the facility deemed required on unit 4. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow best practices to prevent infections including the spread of coronavirus and continued exposure to coronavirus in 15 of 174 residents (Resident #17, #18, #26, #32, #48, #74, #84, #89, #100, #110, #123, #133, #137, #147, #284), resulting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and handling of food and disinfection of thermometers affecting up to 176 residents in the facility. Findings include: An observation on 04/14/2026 at 8:53 AM revealed the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen contained a container of cream of mushroom soup that was labeled as prepped on 4/7/26 and a use by date of 4/13/26 and a container of green beans that was labeled as prepped on 4/8/26 and a use by date of 4/13/26. Dietary Staff (DS) H reported the food items were past their use by date and discarded them. On 04/14/2026 at 12:01 PM, DS K was asked to obtain temperatures of each food item being served in the main dining room. DS K removed a digital thermometer from their shirt pocket and placed the thermometer directly into the potato soup without first disinfecting the thermometer. DS K did disinfect the thermometer between each food item. On 04/15/2026 at 12:15 PM, the 400 unit refrigerator was observed with numerous (over…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three out of three residents (Resident #21, 54 & 151) were treated with respect and dignity.Findings Include Resident #54 (R54) Review of the medical records reflected that R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia and Depression. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/2026 revealed R54 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (Moderate Cognitive Impairment) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R54 receives extensive assistance with bed mobility, total assistance with transfers, and extensive assistance with toileting; she was able to feed herself. R54 is able to make her needs known. Resident #151 (R151) Review of the medical records reflected that R151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Motor Neuron Disease, chronic pain, polyosteoarthritis, and difficult in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review the facility failed to ensure that survey results were readily accessible to the residents of the facility with a current census of 176 residents. During a Resident Council Meeting held on 04/15/2026 at 1:00 PM with a group of 10 residents the survey process was discussed. It was conveyed that all survey results are to be available for easy access for residents and families to read. Nine out of the 10 residents stated that did not know the results of any surveys. They did not know where a binder with this information was located. They added that they wondered about the outcome of the surveys, because they never heard anything more about it once surveyors left the building. Sharing that they were now going to ask about it. During an observation on 04/15/2026 at 4:59 PM, No Survey Binder could be located upon entrance or around the main or common areas for access to residents and families.During an observation on 04/16/2026 at 3:06 PM, A State Binder was seen at the front reception desk, after reviewing the contents in the binder, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to maintain personal privacy and confidentiality of medical information in two residents (R54 and R151) of two reviewed for personal privacy.Findings IncludeResident #54 (R54)Review of the medical records reflected that R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia and Depression.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/2026 revealed R54 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 (Moderate Cognitive Impairment) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R54 receives extensive assistance with bed mobility, total assistance with transfers, and extensive assistance with toileting; she was able to feed herself. R54 is able to make her needs known. Resident #151 (R151)Review of the medical records reflected that R151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Motor Neuron Disease, chronic pain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement a process for resident grievances to be resolved by the facility in a current facility census of 176 residents. During a Resident Council Meeting held on 04/15/2026 at 1:00 PM with a group of 10 residents' grievances were discussed. The residents shared that in order to fill out a grievance form they had to go to the Social Workers office on their unit, and the Social Workers would fill them out. Residents stated they did not know the turnaround time in getting them resolved.When asked if they had these forms at eye level and displaced throughout the facility other than the Social Workers office, the residents stated they did not have those forms available at eye level in any of the common areas. Residents in the confidential group meeting stated they did not know they could fill them out themselves or ask someone to help them. Residents stated they didn't know that. Residents shared that they were familiar with the Property Incident Report. Again, stating they did not have easy access to a Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer one (R9) of one reviewed to the state-designated authority for a change in condition. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension and repeated falls. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/12/26 revealed R9 scored 5 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Preadmission Screening (PAS)/Annual Resident Review (ARR) Level I Screening revealed the review was completed on 2/09/25. All questions were answered No to include The person has a current diagnosis of mental illness or dementia, The person has routinely received one or more prescribed antipsychotic or antidepressant medications within the last 14 days, and There is presenting evidence of mental illness or dementia, including significant disturbances in thought conduct, emotions,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. Findings include: An observation on 4/15/26 at 3:41 PM, revealed a grey unsecured tote was sitting on the couch outside the public restroom on the Renewal Center East unit. No authorized staff were supervising the tote. There was a non-nurse staff member sitting in the dining room and a non-nurse staff member who walked by. Inside the tote was a Medication Inventory Record which revealed a list of medications that were being returned to the pharmacy. The list included one Metamucil, two Lovenox 40 milligrams (mg) injections, two Flexeril 10 mg, and 47 Singulair 10 mg. The actual medications inside the tote included two cards of Flexeril 10 mg for a total of 49 tablets, two Lovenox 10 mg injections, and one Singulair 10 mg tablet. A staff member walked by and when asked if they were the nurse for the unit, they reported no. In an interview on 4/15/26 at 3:44 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G walked by. When asked about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directive (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) information was in place for one resident (#319) of one resident reviewed for advance directives from a total sample of 35 residents. Findings included: Resident #319 (R319) Review of the medical record revealed R319 was admitted to the facility 01/16/2025 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, gastro-esophageal reflux, congestive heart failure (CHF), atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque build up in artery wall), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), morbid obesity, anemia (low number of red blood cells), cancer of kidney, hypertension, and spinal disc degeneration. Review of R319's medical record demonstrated a physician order for advance directives of DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). No facility document entitled DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDER was found in R319's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission/Annual Resident Review (PAS/ARR) was completed after the 30 day exemption period and failed to notify the State Agency Health Authority for 1 Residents ( #62) of 3 residents reviewed for PAS/ARR. Findings include: Review of the clinical record reflected Resident # 62 (R62) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included major depression. Review of R62's PAS/ARR 3877 screening dated 8/24/23 reflected R62 had a mental illness diagnosis and was prescribed an anti-depressant medication. Review of the 3878 dated 8/26/23 reflected R62 was on a 30 day exemption and was expected to be discharged from the facility within the next 30 days. There was no further level I or level II screenings, no indication or documentation that the State Mental Health Authority was aware R62 resided at the facility and no documentation regarding R62 not meeting criteria or needing level II assessment from Community Mental Health. Further review of R62's clinical record reflected R62 had psychotropic medication changes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to formulate comprehensive Care Plans for two (Resident #92 and Resident #370) of 35 reviewed for Care Plans. Findings include: Resident #92 (R92) Review of the medical record reflected R92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/9/24, reflected R92 scored 7 out of 15 (cognitively impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 1/21/25 at 9:31 AM, R92 was observed in a recliner chair watching television. Review of the Physician Orders revealed R92 had an active order with at start date of 10/42/24 for Eliquis 5 milligrams (a blood thinning medication). Review of R92's Care Plan revealed no Care Plan for the anticoagulant. In an interview on 1/27/25 at 1:59 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reviewed the Care Plan for R92 and confirmed that there was no Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$68,744 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $68,744 — penalty dated 2023-12-07
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-12 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $500 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI