No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kalkaska Memorial Health Center

419 South Coral Street, Kalkaska, MI 49646 · Government - Hospital district · 104 certified beds · (231) 258-7500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$10,549 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (17% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • the CMS record shows $10,549 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-02)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
419 S Coral St · (231) 258-7777 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
784 S Cedar St · (231) 258-8681 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
784 S Cedar St · (231) 258-2101 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Laurel St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
216 S Cherry St · (231) 258-9365

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.1%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.4%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.4%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.2%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.4%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.6%14.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.6%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.0%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.3%11.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.491.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.551.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

69.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF69.2%CMS range 63.1–74.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.5–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.2–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.541.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.34
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.83
RN hoursweekends
17.4%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 74.3 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.34 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.21 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-31)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficient practice pertains to Intake 3005509.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent, detect, and respond to an elopement resulting in the likelihood of serious harm, injury, impairment, or death for one Resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for elopement.Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)Review of the FRI submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 4/30/26 at 9:44 PM, included an investigation report which read, in part: On Thursday 4/30/26 at approximately 8:23 PM LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) A was alerted by [Hospital Name] reception desk who was notified by the [City Name] Police Department that they had picked up (R1) kneeling alongside the road near the (local restaurant/grocery store).Time the resident was last seen by facility staff members 4/30/26 at 6:40 PM by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B.(R1) was observed via camera footage to have exited the facility on 4/30/26 at 7:09 PM. He walked from his chair located near the nurses' station facing the doors on [unit name] that exit into the lobby area. He then proceeded through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficient practice pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MI00152479. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent, detect, and respond to an elopement resulting in the likelihood of serious harm, injury, impairment, or death for one Resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for elopement. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 4/11/25 at 7:17 PM when R1 eloped from the facility undetected and was wandering near a busy street and ambulance garage for approximately 19 minutes. R1 was discovered by external entity emergency personnel wandering near the entrance/exit to the ambulance bays. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 5/1/25 at 4:16 PM. This surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the immediacy was removed on 5/2/25 at 11:14 AM, however, noncompliance remains at the potential for more than minimal harm due to sustained compliance which has not been verified by the State Agency (SA). Resident #1 (R1): Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2692547Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and assess three residents (R1, R2, and R3) for safety with hot liquid beverages. This deficient practice resulted incomplete assessments for safety of handling hot liquid beverages for R2 and R3, and resulted in harm when R1 sustained second degree burns from a hot coffee spill . Findings include:R1Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 9/12/25 with diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia with behaviors, and weakness. R1's 10/1/25 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 4/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment.Review of the 'Facility Reported Incident' read, in part, On December 5th, 2025, at approximately 10:30 AM, (R1) was attending an activity in the activity room located on the Legacy unit. During the activity the residents were having coffee and using the Keurig located in the activities room for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2621196Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow fall interventions for one Resident (#4) of five residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with major injury requiring surgery. Findings include: Resident #4 (R4)Review of R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 6/25/24 with diagnosis including above right knee amputation, dementia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Review of R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 indicating R4 was cognitively intact. Section GG of the MDS showed R4 required max assistance for toileting and transfers. R4's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 11/21/24 showed a score of 13, indicating a high risk for falls.Review of R4's Progress Note dated 9/9/25 and 9/10/25 read, in part, Approx. (approximately) 9:40 p.m. this nurse called to (R4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's Power of Attorney (POA; a legal document that authorizes a trusted person, called an agent, to make legal, financial, and/or medical decisions on their behalf) of a change in condition in a timely manner for one Resident (#3) of three residents reviewed for notification of changes. This deficient practice resulted in an 8-hour delay in notifying the POA of the resident's significant change in condition and the potential for delays in treatment.Resident #3 (R3)A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with unspecified severity and other behavioral disturbance. On 5/9/25, R3 was given a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 5 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. R3 also had a POA for medical care and financial decisions appointed to their daughter.The progress notes on 10/5/25 at 1:21AM indicated R3 was found by staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written consent and education was provided prior to administration of psychotropic medications for 5 Residents (#3, #8, #9, #40, & #72) of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic consents. Findings include:Resident #9 (R9) A review of R9’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of R9’s orders indicated a physician order on 12/1/25 for “RisperiDONE (an atypical antipsychotic thought to work on certain parts of the brain) 0.5 mg (milligrams) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for dementia w(with)/ BPSD (Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia) replaces 1 tab daily d/t (due to) failed GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) w/ relapsed verbal/physical agitation.” Further review of R9’s EMR indicated R40 had a legal guardian (a person appointed by a court to make decisions and care for another individual who is unable to do so…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for an upper extremity orthotic for one Resident (#1) of two residents reviewed for range of motion, positioning, and mobility.Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a most recent admission to the facility on 5/24/25 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) and hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the left side. Review of R1s Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a score of 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, indicative of intact cognition.On 7/29/2025 at 10:59 AM, an interview was conducted with R1 who confirmed he suffered a stroke with resulting deficits to the left side of his body. R1's left hand appeared to be edematous with minimal active movement. When asked about interventions for his left arm, R1 stated he was prescribed a left shoulder sling when out of bed for pain management due to a history of shoulder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice for wound care for one Resident (R5) of two Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. Findings include: Review of R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 1/22/25 with diagnosis including peripheral vascular disease, unstageable pressure ulcer to left heel, and type 2 diabetes. R5 received a 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, indicating she was cognitively intact.On 7/29/25 at 11:05 a.m., R5 was observed sitting in her recliner chair with her left leg placed on top of a folded pillow and a blanket covering her. R5 stated that she was feeling well and confirmed that she had a pressure ulcer on her left heel and was heading to a doctor's appointment at 2:45 p.m. for the wound.On 7/30/25 at 9:54 a.m. an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) I who stated that R5 will be receiving a wound dressing change at 3:00 p.m. today. An interview with R5 confirmed this Surveyor could observe the wound dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00150384. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the legal guardian of one Resident (#6) of one resident reviewed for notification of change in condition. Findings Include: Resident #6 (R6) A review of the medical record indicated R6 had a court appointed guardian, who was listed as the #1 emergency contact and a private caretaker who was listed as #2 emergency contact. A nurse's note on [DATE] at 6:33 PM charted by Registered Nurse (RN) A read in part: . (R6) deceased at 1333 (1:33 PM) today. (R6) had a bed bath at 1100. (R6) was wearing O2 (Oxygen) at 4 LPM (Liters Per Minute) via nasal cannula. (R6) was not awake during bath. (R6) resp (respiratory) were reg (regular) but he was blue when HOB (Head of Bed) was flat. O2 sat 72 on 4 LPM (R6) is on Hospice care for Pulmonary Hypertension. (R6) was bladder scanned at 1015 this am for 275 cc (cubic centimeters). (R6) was not (straight) cathed (catheterized) (a tube placed in body to drain urine). at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 81 residents. Findings include: On 8/26/24 at approximately 9:45 AM, a Lexan container was observed in the walk in cooler (WIC) with a label identifying the contents as beef tenderloin, with a production date of 7/14 and use by date of 7/16. An interview with Kitchen Manager (KM) A was conducted at this time and was learned the container had been pulled from the freezer. KM A could not identify the date the product had been removed from the freezer and therefore did not know when the product was to be discarded if not used. KM A reviewed slacking logs which were explained to be documentation of the dates food was removed from the freezer to be thawed (slacked) to be used at a later date. KM A stated there was no documentation as to the date when the product had been removed, and stated it would be discarded. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate therapeutic diet was implemented for two Residents (#67 and #70) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Resident #67 (R67): Review of R67's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 4/26/24 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the cerebellum (brain cancer), failure to thrive, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of clinical census data revealed R67 signed with hospice services on 5/28/24. On 8/26/24 at approximately 11:32 AM, R67 was observed laying in bed with an emaciated (abnormally thin looking) appearance including sunken cheeks, a visible ribcage, and little muscle bulk. R67 was not alert and was unresponsive to questioning. R67 expired on 8/27/24 at 11:35 AM. Review of R67's EMR revealed a physician order, initiated 8/14/24, which read: NPO [nothing by mouth, including food and liquid] diet, NPO texture, NPO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow menus developed by the registered dietitian for 10 residents, of a total 78 residents. This deficient practice has the potential to result in nutritional deficiency to these 10 residents. Findings include: On 10/3/23 at 12:10 PM, observations were made of the noon meal service in the area designated as Greenhouse North. (GH=N). A foil pan of commercially prepared macaroni and cheese was sitting on the counter, carrots were being cooked on a stove top, and commercially canned fruit cocktail was observed in small serving dishes. An interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B was conducted at this time and learned she and other CNAs assigned to the GH-N were responsible for preparing meals and the macaroni and cheese, carrots and fruit cocktail were being served for the lunch meal. A review of the menus provided by the facility was conducted and learned the meal was planned to be both Macaroni & Cheese, meat loaf, french style green beans, orange slices and lemon dessert. The meat loaf and lemon dessert…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by: A. Failing to ensure a staff person washed their hands after being potentially contaminated. B. Failing to ensure the dish machines used for the washing, rinsing and sanitizing of food contact surfaces were tested for proper sanitizing. This deficient practice was observed on a [NAME] House unit housing 10 of the 78 facility residents, with this unit preparing the meals for only these 10 residents. Findings include: A. On 10/4/23 at approximately 7:35 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B was observed entering the kitchen area, wearing gloves. CNA B disposed of an item by pushing her gloved hand down into the garbage can, coming into contact with the swinging lids of the can, then proceeded over to the oven and began preparing pancakes for the residents. CNA B failed to remove her gloves and wash her hands. The FDA Food Code 2017 states: 2-301.14 When to Wash. FOOD EMPLOYEES shall clean their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,549 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $10,549 — penalty dated 2025-05-02
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-16 for 1 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-29 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KALKASKA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTEROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/1990
BANKER, GEORGEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2016
BARR, ROBERTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/23/2020
BRADLEY, GREGORYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
BRENNER, MATTHEWIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/14/2025
BROERING, NOREENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2024
CANNON, NELSONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/30/2010
CERVONE, LYNNETTEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2024
COX, JANETIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2024
DE KORNE, DALEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/23/2020
GENTELIA, GAYENELLIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2024
HART, ALANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2024
HENDRICKS, ERICIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2014
KLIMEK, KARLIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/05/2021
NEEDHAM, DIANAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2019
NICHOL, TERESAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
PAUCH, MELANIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/23/2020
STEPHENS, KIMBERLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/23/2020
STIEHL, CHARLESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2024
STOBERT, ROGERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2023
ZENNER, BRUCEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2014
FINKBEINER, CINDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/04/2023
RAYMOND, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/19/2016
PHILLIPS, AMBERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/14/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 47 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235407. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next