No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bayside Village

832 Sicotte Street, L' Anse, MI 49946 · Non profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (906) 524-6531 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Sep 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$128,467 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $128,467 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-10)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
25225 Cemetery Rd · (906) 355-2468 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
18341 US Highway 41 · (906) 524-6202 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
139 N Main St · (906) 524-6463 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Baraga Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased32.3%10.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.9%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.8%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.2%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.5%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.8%12.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.2%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.8%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.1%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.4%14.8%17.1%worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.55
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 55.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-10)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess elopement risk assessment, ensure exit doors were properly secured, and provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement from the facility for one Resident (#1) of 1 resident reviewed for elopement risk. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #1 exited the facility unsupervised for approximately 30 minutes in 53 degree weather without proper attire and was found in a ditch where Resident #1 fell and was complaining of being cold and had head and neck pain, which required transfer to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation. after 30 minutes being outside in 53 degree weather without proper attire or footwear.This deficiency pertains to Intake 2635984.Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 10/6/25 at 5:13 a.m., when R1 eloped from the facility which was undetected by facility staff. R1 was subsequently observed by incoming facility staff arriving for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) 61588.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a fall, adequate supervision with use of a razor, and ensure reassessment and follow-up for exit-seeking for three Residents (R7, R23, & R38) of 12 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards/supervision. This deficient practice resulted in harm for R7 who incurred a fall with major injury (right pubis fracture), a tongue injury related to unsupervised access to hazardous hygiene supplies, and lack of accurate assessment data to ensure resident safety. This part of this citation is related to complaint intake #2605430 Findings include: Resident #7 (R7) Review of R7's admission Record, retrieved 9/9/25 at 12:56 p.m., revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with current diagnoses that include the following, in part: fracture of the right pubis (pelvic fracture), pain in left knee, contracture of right ankle, contracture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Proper care of a catheter, 2. Accurate and timely documentation was entered for care decisions, and 3. Notification of significant changes were communicated to the physician for one Resident #5 (R5) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in harm when R5 was hospitalized due to a ruptured bladder, urinary tract infection, and septic shock (a subset of sepsis in which particularly profound circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities are associated with a greater risk of mortality than with sepsis alone.), with continued decline resulting in death. Findings include: Review of R5's admission Record, retrieved on July 3, 2025, revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with active diagnoses that included the following, in part: benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, urine retention and type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. R5 scored 15 of 15 on the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to intake #MI00152671. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance and assistive devices were used to prevent a fall with major injury resulting in harm for one resident (R2), out of three residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in hospitalization due to a pelvic fracture. Findings include: Review of R2's 4/19/25 Witnessed Fall Incident report, prepared by Registered Nurse (RN) C, revealed the following information, in part: . CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) was in residents room called out for nurse to help, res (resident [R2]) laying on floor in room on right side next to overbed table. Resident Description: Res states she was getting up to use bathroom and fell during transfer. Was this incident witnessed: N (No). Resident Taken to Hospital? N (No) .Notes: wound to right side of head, c/o (complaint of) right leg discomfort no increased disc (discomfort) with ROM (range of motion) . Statements: No Statements Found. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely provide requested medical evaluation and treatment for two Residents (R1 & R4) out of four residents reviewed for a change in condition. This deficient practice resulted in delayed medical treatment, worsening of condition, and dissatisfaction with care. Findings include:The deficiency pertains to Complaint #3035494.All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST).Resident R4 Review of Complaint Intake #3035494 revealed allegations that included the following, in part: 1. The facility staff failed to provide care for and services for a significant change in condition, and 2. The facility failed to allow the resident's representative to participate in care decisions.Review of R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/26, revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnoses that included the following, in part: Alzheimer's disease, and medically complex conditions. R4 was documented with severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify high fall risk residents, implement a fall prevention program and care plan interventions to prevent falls for three Residents (R1, R2 and R3) of three residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for continued and/or increased falls with possible injury related to staffs' lack of knowledge of residents identified as high fall risk requiring increased supervision. Findings include: On 5/27/26 at 8:53 a.m., review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/10/26, revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included the following, in part: History of falling, unspecified dementia, nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, repeated falls and need for assistance with personal care. R1 scored 4 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of severe cognitive impairment.Review of R1's Fall Risk Evaluation, completed on 4/13/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure supervision, including following care plan interventions to prevent a fall for 1 Resident (#1) of 3 residents reviewed for falls with injury. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with major injury (pelvis fracture) for R1.Findings include:This deficient practice pertains to Intake #2994738.Resident #1 (R1)Review of R1's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, accepted 3/24/26, revealed an admission to the facility on 9/30/24, with active diagnoses that included the following, in part: hip fracture and seizure disorder. R1 scored 3 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), reflective of severe cognitive impairment.Review of R1's admission Record, printed 4/17/26, revealed the following diagnoses, in part; epilepsy, lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood, anoxic brain damage, fracture of left femur (onset date of 9/30/24), unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, left femur neck fracture (onset date of 3/9/26), repeated falls and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was available for eight consecutive hours during a 24-hour period. This deficient practice had the potential for unmet care needs which could affect all 52 residents that reside in the facility.Findings include:Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 2 2025 (January 1-March 31) revealed the facility triggered for No RN hours with infraction dates being: 3/16/25, 3/22/25, 3/23/25 and 3/29/25.Review of facility document reflecting staffing data for the day, dated Saturday March 29th, 2025, revealed no RN coverage for 24-hour period.During an interview on 9/4/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., Human Resources Manager B reported there was not an RN working on the Schedule for Saturday March 29th, 2025.Review of the timesheets revealed there was no RN in the facility from March 28th at 7:11 pm through March 30th at 7:15 a.m., reflective of an absence of an RN for eight consecutive hours in a 24-hour…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review for one of five Certified Nurse's Aides (CNA's) at least every 12 months. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for inadequate care and unmet resident care needs for all 52 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Review of facility personnel records demonstrated that CNA O was hired on 4/16/24 with no performance review.During an interview on 9/4/25 at approximately 10:55 a.m., the Director of Nursing acknowledged there was no performance evaluation completed for CNA O and stated, The facility does not have a policy regarding performance evaluations or when they should be completed.During an interview on 9/5/25 at 7:52 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) acknowledged the performance review for CNA O was not completed and should have been completed annually.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written communication of Monthly Medication Review (MMR) recommendations to the physician for five Residents (#2, #5, #6, #37, and #38) of five residents reviewed for MMRs. This deficient practice resulted in the absence of written MMR recommendations for the last year and had the potential to affect all 52 residents in the facility. Findings include:Resident #2 (R2), #5 (R5), #6 (R6, #37 (R37), #38 (R38)On 9/10/2025 at 9:10 a.m., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), (NHA), and Unit Manager/Registered Nurse (RN) I was conducted. When asked if there was a monthly pharmaceutical review report showing who the pharmacist had seen each month for Monthly Medication Reviews (MMR) reviews, all three agreed there were no written pharmacy recommendations that resulted from the MMRs for any resident in the facility in the last year, including R2, R5, R6, R37, and R38. An interview via telephone or in-person was requested with the facility's consulting Pharmacist J.During a telephone interview on 9/10/2025 at 9:21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure performance improvement projects/activities were conducted to ensure problem areas were identified, tracked, and improvement attained. This deficient practice resulted in lack of improvement in previously deficient finding areas which has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 9/10/25 at 3:10 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked what the QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) committee had been working on. The NHA stated, Putting out fires. When asked what performance improvement projects (PIPs) the facility had been working on in the last year, the NHA (two months in new position) was uncertain of what projects had been implemented. The NHA was asked if they would like another staff member present for the QAPI task interview, and she responded affirmatively. The Director of Nursing (DON) was added to the QAPI interview. During an interview on 9/10/25 at 3:21 p.m., the NHA and DON were asked to provide examples of PIPs the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee meetings were held quarterly with the participation of all required members. This deficient practice resulted in the absence of a required QAA member (Medical Director) in the second quarter of 2025, which had the potential to affect all facility residents. Findings include: During an interview on 9/10/25 at 3:10 p.m., the QAA committee sign-in sheets were reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). Committee meeting sign-in sheets were located by the NHA, detailing the only one QAA committee meeting was held in the second quarter of 2025 (6/12/25). The Medical Director, Physician V's signature was absent from the sign-in sheet, indicating he was not present at the June 2025 meeting. The NHA was asked for QAA committee sign-in sheets for April and May of 2025. The NHA stated, I don't believe there was a QA meeting in April or May of 2025. No sign-in sheets for any additional QAA committee meetings in the second quarter were provided for review.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) training of no less than 12 hours per year was completed for one CNA O of five CNA's reviewed for nurse aide training hours. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unmet resident care needs for all 52 residents that reside in the facility.Findings include:During an interview on 9/4/25 at 10:41 a.m., Human Resources Manager B revealed the annual 12-hour CNA training is based on the CNA hire date.Review of facility document titled Bayside Village Staff Disaster Notification provided from the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed CNA O was hired on 4/16/24 and had only 9 hours of training in a year.Review of Facility Assessment (FA) last reviewed 8/21/25, read in part .Required in-service training for nurse aide.must be sufficient to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides but must be no less than 12 hours per year.During an interview on 9/5/25 at 7:52 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) acknowledged the CNAs must have 12 hours of training a year.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment as evidenced by serving residents their meals on institutional trays and having a common area with a worn down and deteriorating conditions of furnishings and wall finishes at the nursing station. Findings include: On 9/3/25 at 11:40 an observation was made of the facilities nurses' station. The nurses' station entrances were both observed to have lifted and peeled off paneling on the side and corners of the entrance. On the front wall of the nurses' station there was one area of wallpaper that was missing and one area of wallpaper the size of a small basketball that was peeled off and hanging. On 9/3/25 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) G who was asked if the nurses' station was very homelike and if she would leave the condition of the station in her own home and replied, No, it looks rough and could use a revamp. We can't even keep anything like scissors or resident information lying around. Because the nurses' station does not lock on the entrance areas and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:- provide written information on the facility's bed hold policy for five Residents (#27, #15, #2, #3, and #7).- provide written transfer notifications to the resident, and resident's representative for four Residents (#15, #2. #3 and #7).of five residents reviewed for transfers out of the facility. Findings include: Resident #27 (R27) was transferred to the hospital Emergency Department (ED) on 7/26/25. There was no documentation in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicating the resident/responsible party was provided a bed hold notice. During an interview on 9/4/25 at 2:25 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) reported, the facility had not been giving bed hold information to the resident/responsible party when discharged to the hospital. Review of policy titled Transfer and Discharge date implemented 4/11/25, read in part .Emergency transfers to acute care.the facility will.provide orientation for transfer or discharge to minimize anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one medication cart of three medication carts reviewed were attended and or locked and all resident medications were secured and or consumed for one Resident (#27) of fifteen residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 9/4/25 at 12:11 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) A who was asked about medication pass and where she was in the process and replied, I have a couple more to do. I have to go check on a resident for feeding assistance. RN A walked away from her medication cart and left it unlocked/unattended and walked into an adjacent resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/4/25 at 2:30 PM, an observation was made of the 300-hall medication cart that was located at the entrance of the 300-hall unlocked and unattended. This Surveyor walked over to the 300-hall medication cart and opened several drawers which were in a resident common area. RN A was sitting at the nurses' station and was asked how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction for one resident (Resident #37) out of five residents reviewed for psychotropic drug use. Findings include:Resident #37 (R37)Review of R37's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/9/25, revealed medical diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dementia, depression, and aphasia (a condition where a person finds that they have slight or serious difficulty with either their language or their speech). Review of R37's MDS, section E: Behaviors lacked any documentation of having behaviors. On 9/9/25 at 10:40 AM, an observation was made of R37 resting in his wheelchair in the day room with his eyes closed. Review of R37's physician order, dated 8/21/24, revealed quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) twice daily for dementia without behavioral disturbances and escitalopram (antidepressant medication) 10 mg once daily. On 9/10/25 at 11:15, an observation was made of R37 resting with his eyes closed in the day room sitting in his wheelchair. R37 was asked how he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review) level I ([one] (DCH-3877) was obtained annually for one Resident (#6) of two residents reviewed for PASARR requirements . Findings include:Review of R6's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an initial admission to the facility on 3/25/2022 with diagnoses including depression, unspecified hallucinations, unspecified psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. A review of R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 7/10/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section E under Behavioral Symptoms revealed R6 was coded as having physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others (e.g., hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) occurring every 1 to 3 days.A review of the active physician's orders for R6 included an antipsychotic drug quetiapine, prescribed on 7/21/2024, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to update a comprehensive care plan for 1 Resident (#23) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include:Resident #23 (R23)On 9/2/25 at 2:40 PM, an observation was made of R23 in his room, sitting in his wheelchair. R23 was observed with a bruise with various colors of yellow, green, and purple around his right eye and a scab above his right eyebrow. R23 was asked if he had fallen and how and replied by pointing to the bathroom and nodding yes. R23 was not able to say when he had fallen.Review of R23's incident and accident report, dated 8/18/25 at 3:20 PM, read in part Un-witnessed fall.Incident description: Nursing description: Was told by and aid '[Resident's name] fell and is bleeding from his head.' Upon arriving in room, resident was sitting on the edge of the bed with blood dripping from his forehead (sic). Resident description: Resident stated he fell and hit his head on the floor coming from the bathroom. Resident stated 'I hit my head on the floor when I fell.' 'I was coming from my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for supplemental oxygen and ensure respiratory equipment was changed, labeled, and appropriately stored for two Residents (#13 & #27) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care and services. Findings include: On 9/2/25 at 2:49 PM, Resident #13 (R13) was observed with a nebulizer (a drug delivery device used to administer medications into the lungs) on the bedside stand. The tubing attached to the nebulizer was unbagged and labeled with the date 7/30/24. The nebulizer tubing was placed directly atop the nebulizer without a barrier beneath the tubing. On 9/2/25 at 2:49 PM, an oxygen concentrator was observed adjacent to R13's bed. The nasal cannula tube (tubing that delivers supplemental oxygen) was unbagged and undated. The nasal cannula tubing was placed directly atop the concentrator without a barrier between the concentrator and the tubing. R13 said she used oxygen when she experienced respiratory difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician assessments and visit progress notes, including review of the program of care and resident condition, were available in the medical record of one Resident (#25) of 15 residents reviewed for physician visits. This deficient practice resulted in potential delinquent execution of care, unmet care needs, and lack of coordination of care. Findings include:Resident #25 (R25) was admitted to the facility 12/9/21. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) disclosed a primary diagnosis of acute embolism and thrombosis of the deep veins of the left lower extremity. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) I on 9/10/25 at 11:05 AM, RN I said she contacted the physician of R25 on 7/16/25 to report medication errors that occurred with R25 for eight consecutive days, from 7/8/25 through 7/15/25. When RN I was asked if the physician assessed R25 after the medication errors were reported, RN I said, I don't know.The EMR of R25 was reviewed on 9/10/25. The most recent physician documentation available in the EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed timely for two Residents (#7 & #8) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for physician visits. This deficient practice resulted in extended time frames between physician visits and the potential for unaddressed medical needs.Findings include:Resident #7 (R7)Review of R7's admission Record, retrieved 9/9/25 at 12:56 p.m., revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary admitting diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. R7 was their own responsible party for decision making.Review of Physician Visit Progress Notes, retrieved on 9/9/25 at 2:01 p.m., revealed R7 had the following physician visits completed by Physician L following R7's admission to the facility:1. 10/21/24 - initial Physician Visit completed, documented as a late entry on 10/24/24. Completed by Physician L.2. 11/19/24 - second Physician Visit was documented by Physician L.3. 1/28/25 - third Physician Visit was documented as a late entry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent administration of unnecessary medications for one Resident (#10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication.Findings include:This citation is related to complaint intake #2605430Resident #10 (R10)On 8/29/25 at 8:00 AM, an anonymous complaint was reported to the State Agency (SA), stating R10 was given the wrong medication from a facility nurse. Resident #23's (R23's) blood pressure medication was given to R10 who already had low blood pressure and the complainant was concerned for R10. The anonymous complainant stated that there was no documentation of the incident in R10's electronic medical record.Review of R10's progress note, dated 8/28/25 at 7:41 AM, read in part Resident vitals are 140/73 (blood pressure) - 56 (heart rate).Resident was given the wrong medication on previous shift.Review of R10's progress note, dated 8/28/25 at 2:47 PM, read Vital (sic) were checked from watch od med (medication) error. On 9/5/25 at 9:20 AM, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to Intake 2565663Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R25) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors received medications at the frequency ordered by the physician. This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate medication dosages and the potential for subtherapeutic drug levels, blood clot formation, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA - stroke). Findings include: Intake 2565663 alleged Resident #25 (R25) was administered Xeljanz (a medication for rheumatoid arthritis - a chronic, inflammatory disease of the joints that may damage other parts of the body including the lungs, heart, and blood vessels) instead of Eliquis (a blood-thinning medication used to treat or prevent blood clots) during the month of [DATE]. The intake alleged the facility was aware of the error but had not implemented interventions to minimize the risk of recurrence of the medication errors.The electronic medical record (EMR) of R25 was reviewed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Complaint Intake #MI00150445. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for one Resident (R1) of four residents reviewed for medication errors. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for adverse side effects and required transfer to an acute care hospital emergency department for monitoring. Findings include: Review of Complaint Intake #MI00150445 revealed an allegation that R1 was administered the wrong medications on 2/19/25 and was transferred to a hospital emergency department in the morning because they (facility staff and/or emergency room physician) were worried R1s' blood pressure would drop too low. R1 was allegedly alone at the hospital for eight hours worrying that she might have a reaction to the medications, with no notification to the family. Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/13/24, revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnoses that included heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate numbers of staff to meet the needs of four (Residents #47, #7, #15, and #24) of fifty-seven residents sampled for sufficient staffing and three [Resident #C1 (C1), Resident #C4 (C4), and Resident #C7 (C7)] of seven residents from a confidential resident council meeting. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for a decline in resident quality of life and/or quality of care, not receiving medications timely, and unmet care needs for all fifty-seven residents. Findings include: Resident #47 (R47) Review of R47's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed admission to the facility on 3/6/24, with active diagnoses that included: Parkinson's disease, hypertension, anemia, anxiety disorder, and depression. R47 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, reflective of intact cognition. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 8:34 a.m., R47 stated I fell last week when I tried to move, and there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) [P, S, and T] had the required yearly competency trainings, including demonstration in skills and techniques necessary to care for Residents. This deficient practice has the potential for staff to lack the necessary training to adequately meet the needs of all 57 residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: A review of facility staff personnel records revealed CNA P was hired 2/25/22. CNA P's personnel record did not demonstrate dated competency skills since date of hire. A review of facility personnel records revealed CNA S was hired 4/13/21. CNA S's personnel record did not demonstrate dated competency skills after date of hire. A review of facility personnel records revealed CNA T as hired 5/27/23. CNA T's personnel record did not demonstrate dated competency skills after date of hire. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 08:24 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) acknowledged there were undated competency skills for staff. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews for three of three Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's) [P, S, and T] at least once every 12 months. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for inadequate care and unmet resident care needs for all 57 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Review of facility personnel records demonstrated that CNA S was hired on 4/13/21 with no annual performance review. CNA T was hired on 5/27/23 with no annual performance review. CNA P was hired on 2/25/22 with no annual performance review. During an interview on 7/10/24 at 12:49 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged no performance reviews had been completed in the past year. During an interview on 7/10/24 at approximately 1:30 p.m., the Human Resource staff O stated No performance reviews have been completed since 2022. Review of facility policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program implemented on 4/11/24 . read in part, a review of the employee's .records shall be performed at least annually, such as at time of performance review.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During the breakfast meal on 7/9/24 at 7:57 a.m., Staff U was observed removing a baseball-style cap from their head and scratching their scalp before placing the cap back on their head. Staff U began scratching their facial hair before touching the condiments, tableware, and food on a tray next to the serving station. Staff U did not perform hand hygiene after touching their scalp and facial hair and beginning to touch items used or consumed by residents. On 7/9/24 at 8:15 a.m., Staff U began assisting with preparing resident meal trays without performing hand hygiene. At 8:28 a.m., Staff U was observed to be touching the front of their shirt, running their hand from their chest down to their abdomen. Staff U did not perform hand hygiene after touching their shirt and commencing with meal tray set-up. On 7/9/24 at 8:42 a.m., KM D confirmed Staff U was an employee of the Dietary department. KM D said Staff U was a dietary aide. On 7/10/24 at 12:26 p.m., The dining room observation was conveyed to the Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON). The NHA and DON were told Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee met at least once per quarter with the required committee members resulting in the potential for quality-of-care concerns for all 57 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/11/2024 at 7:11 a.m., a review of the available attendance documentation for the QAPI meetings with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed the following: Meeting held on 4/30/2024: The Medical Director or designee did not attend. Meeting held on 1/10/2024: No attendance record found. Meeting held on 7/13/24: The Medical Director or designee did not attend. Meeting held on 8/10/23: The Medical Director or designee did not attend. November 2023: No meeting held. No attendance record found. December 2023: No meeting held. No attendance record found. Meeting held on 1/19/24: The Medical Director or designee, and Director of Nursing (DON) did not attend. Meeting held on 2/2/24: The Medical Director or designee did not attend. Meeting held 3/21/24: The Medical Director or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aide training of no less than 12 hours per year, for three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) P, S, and T of five CNA's reviewed for nurse aide training hours. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unmet resident care needs for all 57 residents in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 7/10/24 at 11:19 a.m., Human Resource Staff O revealed the 12 hours of annual CNA training is based on the CNA's hire date. On 7/10/24 at approximately 1:30 p.m., a review of CNA P training log revealed P was hired on 2/25/22 and had only 9.5 hours of in-service training. A review of CNA S training log revealed S was hired 4/13/21 and had only 5 hours of in-service training. A review of CNA T training log revealed T was hired on 5/27/23 and had only 10.25 hours of in-service training. Review of facility policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program implementation date . 4/11/24 read in part, each nurses aide shall be provided at least 12 hours of in-service training annually, based on his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure training on behavioral health care was provided for two of three staff reviewed for required behavioral health care training. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet behavioral health care needs for residents, with the potential to affect all 57 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of [Vendor] computer training logs on 7/10/24 at approximately 4:00 p.m., revealed the following staff had no behavioral health care training: Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) T was hired on 5/27/23 and CNA S was hired on 4/13/21. Review of policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program implementation date of 4/11/24 read in part, In-service training will be provided by qualified personnel and will be based on the special needs of the residents in the facility. Minimum training will include: . behavioral health . or other behavioral health conditions. Review of Facility Assessment (FA) did not include a requirement for the provision of behavioral health training for staff. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 8:37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise care plans after multiple falls for four Residents (#17, #26, #36, and #47) of fourteen residents reviewed for care planning. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for further falls and the potential for injury. Findings include: Resident #17 (R17) Review of R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/21/24, revealed admission to the facility on [DATE], with active diagnoses that included: unsteadiness on feet, schizophrenia, down syndrome, anxiety disorder, and depression. R17 scored a 99 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of an incomplete interview due to R17 not participating in the assessment or giving a nonsensical response. Review of the facility fall reports revealed R17 had two falls in January on 1/23/24 and 1/24/24, one fall in February on 2/16/24, and one fall in March on 3/2/24. The care plan for R17 was not revised after each fall. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 8:37 a.m., the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits accurately reviewed the total program of care for four Residents (R24, R26, R36, & R38) of four residents reviewed for physician visits. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for lack of comprehensive and supervised medical care. Findings include: Resident #24 (R24) Review of R24's admission Record revealed R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included the following, in part: Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, hallucinations, psychotic disorder with delusions, depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of R24's Physician Order Summary, retrieved 7/11/2024, revealed R24 was prescribed the following, in part: melatonin 3 mg (milligrams) at bedtime and memantine HCL (hydrochloride) 10 mg related to Alzheimer's disease, quetiapine fumarate 25 mg related to psychotic disorder with delusions, and sertraline HCL 75 mg related to depression, Review a comprehensive list of R24's medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure inhalers and eye drops were labeled with dates when opened according to facility policy for two medication carts of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for administration of expired medications to nine residents receiving inhalers and five resident receiving eye drops. Findings include: The 100-hall medication cart was audited on 7/9/24 at 1:33 p.m. with Registered Nurse B (RN B). The cart was observed to contain five bottles of opened eye drops for four different residents. The bottles were not labeled with a date when opened. The cart contained three opened inhalers for two different residents. The inhalers were not labeled with a date when opened. One of the inhalers was inside a clear plastic bag that contained a pharmacy label indicating the pharmacy dispensed the inhaler on 5/30/24. RN B said, They're (inhalers) good for six weeks so that one is expired. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 7/9/24 at 1:42…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessments, physician orders, risk education, medical justification, and care plans for restraints were in place for one Resident (R36) of one resident reviewed for restraints. Findings include: Resident #36 (R36) On 7/10/24 at 3:30 p.m., R36 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with a tray table in front of her. The tray table was attached to both sides of the wheelchair. The tray table extended across the width of the wheelchair, securing R36 in the wheelchair. R36 was unable to remove the tray table from the wheelchair. During the observation, R36 was also observed sitting on a pommel cushion (a cushion with a raised, center protuberance on the front of the cushion). The medical record revealed R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 5/7/24 documented R36 as having short-term and long-term memory impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure collaboration and communication between the facility and hospice provider for one Resident (R56) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: Resident #56 (R56) A family member of R56 was interviewed on 7/8/24 at 2:39 p.m. The family member said R56 was originally admitted to the facility for skilled therapy but was now in the facility for long-term care. The family member said R56 had a severe decline in health and was now receiving hospice services. R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of R56's physician orders did not reveal an order for hospice, and the care plans for R56 did not contain a care plan for hospice. Hospice visit notes and hospice documentation were not located in R56's medical record. A progress note on 6/28/24 read, in part: .(resident's family member) and resident have been discussing hospice services. contacted hospice. There were no other progress notes that mentioned hospice. A hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate medically related social services to one Resident #15 (R15) of one resident reviewed for social services care. This deficient practice resulted in a lack of supportive visits, delayed referral to a behavioral care provider, and psychosocial decline. Findings include: Resident #15 (R15) Review of R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on [DATE], with active diagnoses that included: depression, heart failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. R15 scored a 15 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:35 p.m., R15 stated sometimes I miss my son . he passed away and I get depressed. He had cerebral palsy and I took care of him for most of his life . I couldn't be with him when he died. R15 was teary eyed and stated he passed away this past October .but the staff or social worker does not talk with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely reorder and acquisition of pressure ulcer wound treatment medication for one Resident (R51) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcer treatment medication availability. This deficient practice resulted in the lack of prescribed medication and the potential for worsening of pressure ulcers for R51. Findings include: Review of R51's admission Record, acquired 7/8/24 at 3:23 p.m., revealed R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included the following, in part: Partial traumatic amputation of right great toe, present on admission. Review of R51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 7/9/24 at 8:23 a.m., revealed the following physician orders that required Santyl for the prescribed wound dressing medication in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). 1. #23 Left Heel: Clean wound bed with Dial soap and pat dry. Apply nickel thick Santyl to wound bed and cover with Tegaderm High…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice has two parts: A and B. Part A: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for one Resident (R24) of five residents reviewed for medication regimen reviews. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the administration of unnecessary medication or a medication dosage in excess of what was required to treat the resident symptoms. Findings include: Resident R24 Review of R24's admission Record revealed R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included the following, in part: Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, hallucinations, psychotic disorder with delusions, depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of R24's Physician Order Summary, retrieved 7/11/2024, revealed R24 was prescribed the following psychotropic medications: quetiapine fumarate 25 mg related to psychotic disorder with delusions, and sertraline HCL 75 mg related to depression, Review of R24's [Company Name] Psychological Assessment &…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one Resident (R1) out of three residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an unsupervised exit from the facility and unsafe ambulation and wandering off facility property for a cognitively impaired Resident. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of the facility Incident Investigation of R1's elopement from the nursing home on 4/7/24 at 6:06 p.m., revealed the following information: Visitor entered building and allowed [R1] to exit. R1 was back in the building by 6:15 p.m.; with staff at 6:13 p.m. Staff were alerted to a possible resident outside of the facility . R1 was off facility property . (Elopement verified) . Administrator (NHA), had a discussion with the wife of the visitor who opened the door . She verified it was her husband who opened the door and stated that he doesn't visit regularly and isn't as familiar with the residents as she is (and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and documentation of psychotropic medications for 4 residents (Resident #56, #36 #50 and #51) reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medication use with the increased potential for serious side effects and adverse reactions, and the inability to monitor the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment due to lack of documented supporting evidence. Findings include: Resident #56 (R56) Review of an admission Record revealed R56 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: altered mental status, generalized anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of R56's Order Summary revealed, RisperiDONE Tablet 0.25 MG Give 0.25 mg by mouth two times a day related to ALTERED MENTAL STATUS, UNSPECIFIED. Review of the FDA prescribing information revealed Risperdal indications for use: RISPERDAL is an atypical antipsychotic agent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal vital sign results for 2 residents (Resident #1 and #56) reviewed for notification of changes, resulting in the lack of assessment and monitoring, and the potential for the worsening of a medical condition and delay in treatment. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: hypertension. Review of R1's Physician Order dated [DATE] revealed, Metoprolol Tartrate Tablet 25 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day (blood pressure medication that can cause decreased heart rate). Review of R1's Nursing Progress Note dated [DATE] revealed, During Sp02 (oxygen saturation) check noted to record a HR (heart rate) of 37 bpm (beats per minute). Checked apical HR and found to be 48 . Review of R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed no documentation that R1's provider was notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance for two residents (Resident #48 and Resident #18) who depend on staff assistance to complete activities of daily living, resulting in the potential for skin break down and feeling forgotten for Resident #48 and the potential for dental caries for Resident #18. Findings: Resident #48 (R48) Review of an admission Record revealed R48 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of Muscular Dystrophy. R48 required extensive assistance from staff for transfers and going to the bathroom. During an interview on 07/16/23 at 10:01 AM, R48 reported she was on a bed pan and would use the call light shortly to alert staff when she needed assistance getting off the bed pan. During an observation on 07/16/23 at 10:13 AM, R48 activated the call light system, staff immediately responded to the room, the call light was turned off, and staff left R48's room within 10 seconds. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an in-use oxygen tank was full and functional for 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for oxygen/respiratory care, resulting in the potential for respiratory distress. Findings: Resident #1 (R1) Review of an admission Record revealed R1 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: hypertension. Review of R1's Physician Order dated 10/12/21 revealed, May use O2 as needed to maintain oxygen saturation >=89% (greater than 89%) as needed for Emergency use per Standing orders. During an observation on 07/16/23 at 10:35 AM, R1's was in the dining room, wearing nasal cannula oxygen tubing, which was connected to an oxygen tank. The needle gauge was pointing to the red indicating the tank needed to be refilled/changed. During an observation on 07/16/23 at 10:58 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D assisted R1 with her dentures and did not assess R1's oxygen tank. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure systems were implemented to accurately account for controlled substances when licensed nurses were not signing out controlled substances from narcotic sheets prior to administration of the controlled substances, resulting in the potential for drug diversion. Findings: Review of a facility policy Medication Storage, undated, reflected It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation and security. During an observation on 7/17/23 at 9:06 AM, a narcotic count was conducted of the 300 Hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. Discrepancies were discovered on the narcotic sheets for Resident #47's prescribed Gabapentin, R22's Lorazepam and R31's Gabapentin. When asked, LPN A reported she had forgotten to sign the narcotic sheet when she pulled the medication from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #45) was free from significant medication errors when a medication was not administered according to the physician orders. Findings: Resident #45 (R45) Review of an admission Record reflected R45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, dementia, major depressive disorder and weakness. During an observation on 7/17/23 at 8:35 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A prepared medications to be administered to R45. LPN A placed 1 tablet of Midodrine HCl 5 MG into a separate medication cup from the other medications R45 was to take that at that time. R45 explained that the midodrine was kept separate because she needed to check his BP prior to administration. LPN A took R45's BP which was 116/70. LPN A said that R45's blood pressure was not within the parameters ordered by the physician and the drug needed to be held. LPN A did not administer the midodrine to R45 and was witnessed wasting the drug in the sharps container on the medication cart. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive Water Management Plan (WMP) for the control of Legionella in the potable water supply system. This deficient practice has the potential to lead to the growth and proliferation of Legionella in the water supply system and respiratory infections from the Legionella group bacteria affecting all 57 residents. Findings include; On 7/09/24 between 8:45 AM and 10:00 AM observations were made with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) G of the facility's potable water system. A humidifier was identified in the boiler room and explained by MS G that the device provided humidified air into the resident area by aerosolizing potable water via a steam and injected into ventilation air ducts. MS G was asked if this device had been assessed related to the facility's WMP for Legionella control, to which he replied No. When asked what task(s) was/were performed in the control of Legionella, MS G stated the facility collected one sample from the water supply system per year, submitted it to a local…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$128,467 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $88,570 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
  • $39,897 — penalty dated 2025-05-07
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-08 for 75 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-06 for 63 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BARAGA COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST100%since 01/18/2010
ABBOTT, LEAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/06/2026
LAPOINTE, CAROLEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2011
DAULT, EMILYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
YOUNGGREN, SHIRLEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/20/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$334per resident / day
operating cost
$10,146per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$301per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235144. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next