Lapeer County Medical Care Facility
1455 Suncrest Drive, Lapeer, MI 48446 · Government - County · 202 certified beds · (810) 664-8571 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $68,445 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-19)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.8% | 10.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.2% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.2% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.6% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.0% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.3% | 24.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.14 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.64 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.6%CMS range 31.2–58.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 6.4–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 85.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 21.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 165.7 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent two unstageable pressure ulcers (a severe wound with full-thickness tissue loss, fully covered by slough or eschar, making its true depth hidden) for one resident (Resident #164) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in bilateral heel pressure ulcers. Findings include.Resident #164:On 3/30/2026, at 10:45 AM, Resident #164 was propelling in the hallway in their wheelchair. There were no wheelchair pedals and the residents' heels were slightly dragging on the floor while they propelled. Resident #164 had on socks. On 3/31/2026, at 9:51 AM, a record review of Resident #164's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease and Psychotic disorder. Resident #164 had severely impaired cognition and required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. A review of the progress notes revealed 1/30/2026 14:36 (2:36 PM)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place and supervision was provided to prevent a fall with injury for one resident (Resident # 401) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and falls, resulting in Resident #401 experiencing multiple falls and sustaining several fractures. Findings Include: Resident #401: Accidents: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #401 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, depression, arthritis, and history of urinary tract infections. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive decline with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 and Resident #401 needed assistance with all care. On 12/12/23 at 12:30 PM, Resident #401 was observed lying in bed awake visiting with a family member. The resident smiled but did not answer or respond to questions. The family member, said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 03/30/2026 at 9:36am, during the initial kitchen tour, observed can opener visibly soiled. During this observation, Culinary Supervisor A was queried on how often the can openers are cleaned and stated it's cleaned daily. On 03/30/2026 at 9:37am observed a chemical feed downstream of an atmospheric vacuum breaker in the dishwashing area. One wasting tee was observed lying inside the sink basin and another wasting tee sitting above the sink in a bin. According to the State of Michigan's 2008 Cross Connection Manual on atmospheric vacuum breakers, AVBs shall not be installed where they will be under continuous pressure for more than 12 hours (i.e. no downstream shutoff valve).According to the State of Michigan's 2008 Cross Connection Manual on chemical feeder backflow prevention, Another concern with a hose being run from a faucet to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Follow care-planned interventions for one resident (Resident #12) , 2) Ensure supervision for one resident (Resident #164), and 3) Ensure safety with hot liquids for one resident (Resident #91) out of five residents sampled for safety, resulting in blisters from a hot liquid and the inability to propel freely. Finding include:Resident 91 (R91): 03/30/2026 4:20 PM, an observation was made of R91 in her room sitting in their wheelchair. The Resident was observed to not be sitting upright but was slouched in the wheelchair. The Resident was working on activities on her overbed table. The Resident was interviewed but was unreliable with answers and did not engage in conversation. An observation was made of limited mobility of her arms. A review of Resident 91's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 7/10/20 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, scoliosis, dementia and osteoarthritis. A review of R91's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to eliminate dead end plumbing and ensure appropriate backflow prevention was installed at plumbing fixtures, resulting in the potential for contamination to the water supply, affecting all residents. Findings include: On 03/31/2026 at 9:48am observed a dead end water line in the one east pod kitchen area. During this observation, Maintenance and Housekeeping Manager D was interviewed on what the water line was used for, and she stated the line used to feed into an old juice machine, but it was removed about a month ago and that the unused water line needed to be removed. On 03/31/2026 at 10:16am observed dead end water line that was plumbed through the wall near the hand sink in the soiled utility room on two west. During this observation, Maintenance and Housekeeping Manager D was asked what the water line was used for and she stated she wasn't sure. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Controlling Legionella in Potable Water Systems dated January 3rd, 2025, Eliminate dead legs, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated in a respectful and dignified manner to ensure toileting assistance for one resident (Resident #162), and provide dining assistance in the 1-South dining room, resulting in Residents having soiled briefs due to call lights not being answered timely, the potential for weight loss, and residents' feelings of frustration. Dining Observation: Residents in the 1st Floor South Dining Room On 3/30/2026 at 12:09 PM, during an observation in the 1st floor South dining room, a group of 10 residents were observed sitting in the dining room, for the lunch meal. Per Nurse Q, the meal usually started at 12:00 PM. Two Nurse Aides R and S were delivering the drinks to the residents. The aides were asked how many staff were usually assigned to assist the residents with their meals in the dining room and hallways and they said Two. The meal was served beginning at 12:10 PM.-The two aides assisted in passing trays to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident (#56) of 1 resident reviewed for smoking, resulting in Resident #56 lacking a care plan to identify where to store the resident's smoking materials including a lighter. Findings Include: Resident #56:Smoking A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, left sided weakness, history of traumatic brain injury, COPD, Nicotine dependence, with withdrawal. Anxiety, Depression, peripheral vascular disease, chronic pain syndrome. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 15/15, needed some assistance with care and used a motorized wheelchair. On 3/30/2026 at 9:30 AM, during the Entrance Conference with the Administrator and Director of Nursing/DON, the Administrator said the facility was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for psychotropic medications for one resident (R2) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications resulting in an inaccurate care plan. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2):R2 is 90yrs old and originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and chronic kidney disease.On 04/01/2026 at 8:56AM, a medication regimen review (MRR) was conducted in the electronic medical record (EMR).On 04/01/2026 at 9:00AM, record review of the physician's orders revealed that R2 is prescribed, Seroquel 25mg, one tablet by mouth at bedtime, dated 2/12/26 and Remeron 15mg, once daily, with a dose change noted on 6/11/25.On 04/01/2026 at 9:05AM, record review revealed a care plan is present for psychoactive medication, initiated on 03/13/2024, last revised on 04/15/2025. The care plan references Remeron and that a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was attempted on 4/7/25. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed with the assessment, monitoring, documentation and timely physician notification of a medication error for one resident (Resident 131) who had been administered in error a Norco 5mg/325 mg (an opioid pain medication of a combination of acetaminophen and hydrocodone), of one resident reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include:Resident #131 (R131):On 3/30/26 at 9:46 AM, an observation was made of Resident 131 lying in bed. The Resident aroused to a knock on her doorway. The Resident was asked questions but did not answer questions reliably and did not engage in conversation. A review of Resident 131's (R131) medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 5/23/18 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 4/15 that indicated severely impaired cognition. A review of the Resident's allergies revealed an allergy to codeine and sulfa…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an Enteral nutrition (tube feeding/nutrition through a feeding tube into the stomach or intestines) formula was identified when ordered for one resident (Resident #23) of 1 resident reviewed for enteral nutrition, resulting in the potential for Resident #23 to not receive the appropriate Enteral formula.Findings Include: Tube Feeding Resident #23: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of a traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, quadriplegia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy tube (feeding tube into the stomach), and hearing loss. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a memory problem and needed assistance with all care. Section K Swallowing/Nutritional Status from the MDS assessment indicated the resident had a feeding tube and received his nutrition and fluids via the feeding tube.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an oxygen administration and care plan was updated for one resident (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for oxygen administration, resulting in an empty oxygen tank and low oxygen saturations. Findings include. Resident #1: On 3/30/2026, at 9:55 AM, Resident #1 was sitting in their wheelchair with their overbed table in front of them. Resident #1 appeared anxious and was crying. Resident #1 had oxygen on via nasal canula that was set to 2 liters via the wall oxygen. On 3/30/2026, at 11:30 AM, a record review of Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure, Dementia and heart arrythmia. Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition and required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living. A review of Physician orders revealed . Administer Oxygen @ 3 Liter/min Via Nasal Canula with humidification on (24 hrs/day) . Start Date 3/21/2026 . A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize care-planned interventions for behaviors for one resident (Resident #74) who wandered through the unit propelling their wheelchair, going into other residents' rooms, and displacing items of other residents, of one resident reviewed for mood/behaviors. Findings include:Resident 74 (R74):On 3/30/26 at 10:23 AM, observations were made on the dementia unit of the facility. An observation was made of R74 in a wheelchair, propelling herself at a fast pace, up and down the hallway. R74 was observed going in and out of resident rooms, going from one room and going across the hall to another room and proceeded to go in multiple rooms. R74 was observed to be going into other rooms where other residents were in. At one point, a resident was walking out of her room and R74 was going into the room, the other resident was able to sidestep fast enough not to collide with R74 in their wheelchair. Staff were in the area but did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number 2661843. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided during mealtime for two residents (#1 and 2), who had safe swallow instructions during meals, of four Residents reviewed for dining and assistance with meals. Findings include:On 11/13/25 at 12:15 PM, an observation was made of the dining room on the second floor during the lunchtime meal. The following observations were made:-Resident 1 (R1) was sitting in a Broda chair. The Broda chair is slightly reclined. There were two men working on the construction near the cabinets with yellow caution tape blocking the area. Resident 1 is positioned facing the construction area. -Resident 2 (R2) was positioned at a table with two other residents with her back towards the construction area and facing the outer wall. -At 12:32 PM, lunch trays are passed on the 2nd floor dining area. The hot food is served onto plates on the other side of the kitchenette area and not in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and responded to in a timely manner for 11 residents (R3, R16, R22, R36, R46, R52, R61, R63, R80, R116, R138) and a confidential group of residents, resulting in long call light wait times, delayed assistance and call lights not being accessible. Findings include: Resident #16 R16 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and atherosclerotic heart disease. R16 has a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating they are cognitively intact. On 02/19/25 at 10:16AM, an interview was conducted with R16. R16 was asked if the facility staff answers her call light in a timely manner. R16 stated the staff can be slow to answer call lights, it's especially slow during meal pass times and when they are picking up trays. R16 stated that she has waited 3hrs one time. R16 was asked if they have ever had any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to update and reviews care plans for psychotropic meds, pain, skin care and respiratory care for 4 Residents (R#3, R#32, R#47, & R#90) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) General According to the Electronic Medical Record reviewed on 2/19/2025 at 2:00 PM, R3 was [AGE] years old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzeihmers Disease (late onset), Carcinoma of the situ of skin and scalp, and neck, Squamous cell cardinoma of the skin of scalp and neck and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 in addition to other diagnoses. R3 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 08/15 assessed on 12/4/2024. A Score of 08-12 on the BIMS indicates moderate cognition impairment. A score of 0-7 points suggests severe cognitive impairment and a scor of 13-15bpoints suggests that cognition is intact. R3, according to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] is dependent with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and monitored environment to prevent falls and injuries for 4 Residents (# 21, #103, #126, #127) of 13 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in residents having multiple falls and Resident's #'s 126 and #127 sustaining large bruises on their faces. Findings Include: Resident #21 Accidents A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Alzheimer's dementia, History of a stroke, heart disease, hypertension, , orthostatic hypotension, history of repeated falls, anxiety, kidney disease, and arthritis. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 3/15 and the resident was dependent for most care. On 2/18/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident #21 was observed sitting in the day room for an activity. A record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a consistently operational call light system affecting three residents (Resident #46, Resident #63 and Resident #74) and a resident census of 158, resulting in extended call light times, unmet needs, and inconsistent tablet operability. Finding include: FACILITY On 02/19/25 at 02:18PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E. CNA E was asked how they know if there is a resident call light on. CNA E stated they have tablets in the halls that will show call lights that are on. CNA E was asked how reliable the tablets are. CNA E stated, sometimes the tablets will crash and I will reboot it. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. We have an app for our phones as well, but it drains my battery so I don't use it. There is a computer in the nurses station that has every call light that is on in the building. On 02/19/25 at 2:24PM, an interview was conducted with CNA F. CNA F was asked if there was any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to validate and update the care plan for DNR status for one resident (R#47) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: Resident #47 Advance Directives On 02/19/25 at 12:47 PM, R47's Advanced Directives in her clinical file was dated 11/1/2023. Resident #47 (R47) According to the review of Electronic Medical Records conducted on 2/20/25 at 2:45 PM, R47 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting left dominant side, vascular dementia with mood disturbances, and peripheral vascular disease in addition to other diagnoses. R47's son was the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and emergency contact. R47's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), which was assessed on 12/25/24, revealed a score of 09/15. A score of 9 indicates moderate cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 represents severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one resident (R32) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #32 R32 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, dementia, major depressive disorder, dysphagia and atrial fibrillation. R32 has a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 02/20/25 at 09:57AM, record review revealed that R32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and there is a physician's order dated 09/10/24 for Venlafaxine (Effexor) HCl ER Tablet 150mg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. On 02/20/25 at 11:31AM, record review revealed that R32 has a care plan in place for Effexor for depression, however, Effexor was discontinued on 01/05/25. The psychotherapeutic medications care plan was initiated on 12/6/24, psychotherapeutic medication (Effexor) was initiated on 09/10/24. On 02/20/25 at 11:53AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for two residents (#46 and #78) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings include: Resident #46: A review of Resident #46's medical record revealed a readmission into the facility on 7/28/22 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, quadriplegia, heart disease, and contracture of unspecified joint. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment revealed the Resident had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living, mobility and transfers. On 2/18/25 at 12:27 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #46 who answered questions and engaged in conversation. The Resident was observed to have limited mobility of her hands. The Resident's fingernails were long and there were a couple nails that had nail polish that was chipped or worn off from most of the nails. The Resident was asked about her fingernails, and she responded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1). Ensure coordination of Hospice Services for one resident (#151) reviewed for Hospice service. Findings Include: Resident #151: Hospice and End of Life A review of the Face sheet and MDS/Minimum Data Set assessment indicated Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Seizures, history of falls with fractures: fourth cervical vertebra, nasal bones, maxilla, Dementia, anxiety, depression and hypertension. The resident wore a neck brace for the cervical fracture. A review of the physician orders indicated the resident was admitted to Hospice services on 1/21/2025 on admission. On 2/18/2025 at 12:17 PM, Resident #151 was observed sitting in a chair in his room watching TV. He was talkative and tried to answer question. He said he did not think he was receiving Hospice services. A review of the Care Plans identified a Hospice Care Plan dated initiated 2/3/2025 and revised 2/4/2025 with an intervention: Work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor pain levels and update a care plan for pain for one resident (Resident #3) with a diagnosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the skin of scalp and neck requiring comfort in positing and wound care treatment of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: Resident #3: Pain Management According to the Electronic Medical Record reviewed on 2/19/2025 at 2:00 PM, R3 was [AGE] years old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease (late onset), Carcinoma of the situ of skin and scalp, and neck, Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin of scalp and neck and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 in addition to other diagnoses. R3 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 08/15 assessed on 12/4/2024. A Score of 08-12 on the BIMS indicates moderate cognition impairment. A score of 0-7 points suggests severe cognitive impairment and a score of 13-15 points suggests that cognition is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that clinical staff received completed yearly Performance Evaluations and competencies for 2 of 2 nurses (N and O) and Performance Reviews for 2 of 2 Nurse Aides (L and M), Findings Include: FACILITY Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing: On 2/24/2025 at 9:11 AM, during a review of the Nurse and Nurse Aide competency reviews for Nurses N (Charge Nurse) and O and Certified Nursing Assistants L and M, it was identified there were no yearly Performance reviews. The nurses' yearly competencies had not been completed. Nurse N's competencies were last completed 1/26/2024: greater than 1 year prior. Nurse O's competencies were last completed 1/22/2024: greater than 1 year prior. On 2/25/2025 at 10:30 AM, Staff Education Nurse C was interviewed about the yearly clinical staff Performance reviews. He said the facility did not complete performance reviews to aid in determining staff training/competency needs for the nurses or nurse aides. Staff Educator Nurse C said the facility talked about completing yearly Performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication had arrived timely to the facility and that medication was administered following physicians' orders and professional standards of care for one resident (Resident #358) of six residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in Resident #358 not receiving the medication Renvela and Cholestyramine as ordered and the medication Cholestyramine given with other medications. Findings include: Renvela, sevelamer carbonate, a medication used to control phosphorus levels used in diagnosis of patients with chronic kidney disease that are on dialysis. Cholestyramine, a bile acid sequestrant medication that absorbs/combines with bile acids, excreted in the feces which leads to a decrease in low density lipoprotein plasma levels and decrease in serum cholesterol levels and is recommended to take other medication at least 1 hour before or 4 to 5 hours after taking cholestyramine. On 2/20/25 at 10:29 AM, an observation was made during medication administration of Resident #358 receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Infection Prevention and Control standards of practice were followed for 1) Personal Protection Equipment/PPE use during wound care for one resident (Resident #90) in Enhanced Barrier Precaution. Findings Include: Resident #90: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment for Resident #90 indicated an admission date of 3/12/2020 with diagnoses: Alzheimer's dementia, depression, arthritis, hypertension, heart disease, and anxiety. An unstageable pressure ulcer on the right heel was identified on 1/13/2025. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident had severe cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 5/15 and the resident needed assistance with all care. A review of the assessments for Resident #90 revealed she also had a wound on the outer base/hallux of her right great toe and on the top of the toe. On 2/21/2025 at 8:45 AM, wound care for Resident #90 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure warm water availability in residents' rooms and that sink drainage was adequate for three residents (#23, #25 and #70), of a sample of 17 reviewed for environmental concerns. Findings include: On 2/19/25 at 10:12 AM, an observation was made in Resident #25's room of the Resident getting ready for a bed bath. CNA BB had left the room with a wash basin and returned a couple minutes later. When asked why the CNA had left the room to get water, the CNA reported that the sink in the room did not produce hot enough water to wash a resident up. The CNA state, It will get a little warm then go cooler, but not enough warm water when they are getting washed up. The hot water faucet was turned on and was lukewarm and the sink filled too much to keep it running. When asked about the poor drainage of the sink, the CNA stated, Most of the sinks down here, they don't drain fast enough. On 2/21/25 at 9:43 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #70 who answered questions and engaged in conversation. The Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145825. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly apply restraints in a transportation van and operationalize facility policy for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for incident and accidents resulting in the resident falling out of their rolling walker during transportation and getting assisted off the floor of the van before being assessed by a license nurse. Findings include: Resident #1: Resident #1 is [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic pain syndrome, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia and depression. Resident #1 has a brief interview for mental status score of 15 indicating they are cognitively intact. On 07/30/24 at 10:25am, an interview was conducted with R1. R1 was observed with a bruise on their left cheek, sitting on the edge of the bed and in good spirits. R1 stated they have been receiving Cortisone injections for an ongoing right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00136997 and MI00139597. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified and respectful treatment for three residents (Resident #33, Resident #49, and Resident #106) reviewed and nine of nine Confidential Group Residents, resulting in Resident #106's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag being exposed and not contained/covered, meals being served on aluminum foil, call lights not being answered in a timely manner, a lack of available staff, staff speaking to staff in a rude manner, and resident verbalizations of feeling unimportant and unvalued. Findings include: Resident #106: On 12/13/23 at 9:43 AM, Resident #106's room door was open. From the hallway, the Resident was observed laying in bed uncovered with their legs and brief exposed. An indwelling urinary catheter was present, and the drainage bag was uncovered and hooked on a walker positioned next to the bed. The Resident's eyes were closed and an overbed table with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care plan interventions were evaluated/revised for effectiveness and updated with changes/interventions for two resident (Residents #7, and Resident #403) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in in the lack of care plan revision, implementation of appropriate interventions and the potential for unmet care needs relating to activities of daily living, weights and call bell use. Findings include: Resident #7: A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart disease, asthma, urinary tract infection, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, sepsis, dementia, and mood disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 that indicated severely impaired cognition and needed substantial/maximal assistance with most activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care for four residents (Resident #7, Resident #127, Resident #134, and Resident #135) of four residents reviewed for changes in condition, resulting in a delay in treatment of skin infestation for Resident #127 and Resident #135 with the potential of worsening, itching, pain and infection; a delay in assessment and potential treatment of rectal pain for Resident #134, and a failure to assess and monitor a 10 pound weight gain in seven days for Resident #7 with the potential adverse health conditions to go undetected and untreated. Findings include: Resident #7: A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 5/18/22 and readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart disease, asthma, urinary tract infection, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, sepsis, dementia, and mood disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/8/23, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses (RN's-Registered Nurses and LPN's-Licensed Practical Nurses) received yearly evaluations/competencies to assure resident care and safety, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing of residents in accordance with the facility assessment and residents' plans of care for five nurses of five nurses reviewed for education and competencies, affecting all 152 residents residing in the facility, resulting in the potential nursing staff lacking necessary training, skills, and competencies to adequately care for the needs of the residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On [DATE] at 4:12 PM, an interview was conducted with Inservice Director V. The Inservice Director was questioned regarding evaluations and competencies for the Nursing staff. The following Nurses were reviewed for yearly evaluations and competencies: LPN Z, RN Y, RN AA, RN BB, RN G, all of whom worked at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00141186. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and invite a resident and the resident's representative to regularly scheduled care conferences for one resident (Resident #403) of one resident reviewed for care conferences (meeting to discuss residents' plans of care), resulting in the resident and the residents' representatives being uninformed and not involved in their plan of care or able to make choices for care at the facility. Findings include: Resident #403: A review of Resident #403's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, spastic hemiplegia, diabetes, anxiety disorder, dementia, mood disorder, dysphagia after a stroke, and psychotic disorder with delusions. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the Resident had moderately impaired cognition. According to the Progress notes in the medical record, the Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate documentation, consent, assessment, a physician's order, evaluation, and re-evaluation of a restraint for one resident (Resident #33 [R33]) of two residents reviewed from a total sample of 27 residents, resulting in a resident confined in a Broda chair without a consent, evaluation for appropriateness, physician's order, and re-evaluation for appropriateness. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33): On 12/12/23 at 1:57 PM, R33 was observed in the dining room eating lunch assisted by CNA C. R33 was sitting in a semi-reclined position (approximately 110-120 degrees angle) on a Broda wheelchair (high back, reclining wheeled chair with rest base for both lower extremities). Although R33 was not moving a lot, R33 did not appear distressed or show any discomfort. CNA C when queried, explained why R33 was currently on this chair, and indicated it was because R33 had a tendency to slide down on the regular wheelchair. Although CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure completion of comprehensive investigations for injuries of unknown origin for one resident (Resident #64) of one resident reviewed resulting in a lack of completion and documentation of a thorough investigation to identify a cause of injury, lack of reporting to the State Agency, and the potential for further injury and unidentified abuse. Findings include: Resident #64: On 12/13/23 at 9:55 AM, Resident # 64 was observed sitting in the common dining/sitting room of the facility facing the window with their eyes closed. The Resident was sitting in a Rock N Go (high backed, reclining wheelchair with fabric style back, the ability to rock, and footrests) wheelchair. The back of the chair was in a locked in a recline position. The footrests of the chair were not elevated and Resident #64's lower extremities were dangling and did not reach the footrests. When spoke to, Resident #64 did not open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents (Resident #27 and Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for care plans pertaining to the use of Broda chair R33 and use of supportive device for positioning R27's Right Upper Extremity (RUE) and Right Lower Extremity (RLE) from a total sample of 27 residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in not having an active and comprehensive care plan to ensure safety and appropriate care for positioning was followed and to ensure range of motion (ROM) was maintained and prevent further decline in functional abilities. Findings include: Resident #27 (R27): During the observation tour in the Dementia Unit Dining Area on 12/12/23 at 1:41 PM, R27 was observed eating lunch independently in the Dementia Unit dining area. R27 was observed sitting in the wheelchair, feeding herself using her left hand to hold the spoon while eating dessert. R27's right arm was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care per care plan for two residents (Resident #53 and Resident #128), resulting in unkept facial hair, long dirty nails, missed showers, unchanged clothing and dirty hair with the likelihood of decreased moods. Findings include: Resident #128: On 12/12/23, at 12:16 PM, Resident #128 was sitting in their room. They had red plaid pajama pants on with nothing else. Their nails were dirty, jagged, and approximately a quarter inch long. The had unkept facial hair. Resident #128 was asked if they needed any help with their nail care and Resident #128 stated, I guess they would help me if I asked. On 12/13/23, at 3:04 PM, Resident #128 was in their room sitting at their table. They had the same red plaid pajama pants. Resident #128 was asked if they needed anything and Resident #128 stated, nope. On 12/13/2023, at 2:00 PM, a record review of Resident #128's electronic medical record revealed an admission on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen tubing was stored appropriately and turn off wall-mounted oxygen while not in use for one resident (Resident #68), resulting in a cross-contamination of oxygen tubing and unsafe oxygen storage with the possibility of combustion causing a fire. Findings include: Resident #68: On 12/12/23, at 10:54 AM, Resident #68 was sitting in their wheelchair at their desk. The wall mounted inline oxygen was running at 2 liters. The oxygen tubing was draped dangling over the wall mount uncovered. The resident had oxygen hooked to a nasal cannula from a portable oxygen tank on their wheelchair. On 12/13/23, at 8:45 AM, Resident #68 was not in their room The wall mounted inline oxygen was running at 2 liters and the tubing was again draped over the wall mount uncovered. On 12/13/2023, at 11:00 AM, a record review of Resident #68's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor Vancomycin blood trough levels and hold IV (intravenous) antibiotic medication, Vancomycin, according to abnormal trough laboratory levels for one resident (Resident #7), of two residents reviewed for antibiotic medication administration, resulting in Resident #7 receiving IV Vancomycin when Vancomycin trough levels were high with the potential for adverse drug consequences and side effects of the medication. Findings include: Resident #7: A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 5/18/22 and readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included heart disease, asthma, urinary tract infection, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, sepsis, dementia, and mood disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/8/23, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 that indicated severely impaired cognition and needed substantial/maximal assistance with most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication had a 14-day stop date for one resident (Resident #74), resulting in the lack of physician follow up of the needed PRN antipsychotic medication with the likelihood of side effects going unnoticed. Findings include: Resident #74: On 12/12/23, at 11:05 AM, Resident #74 was lying in their bed. They complained they were bored and had worked on their puzzle all morning. On 12/12/23, at 2:30 PM, a record review of Resident #74's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease and Anxiety. Resident #74 had A review of the physician orders revealed Ativan Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligrams) . PRN Every 4 Hours . For Restlessness, anxiety . Start Date: 11/17/2023 End Date: Indefinite . A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) 11/1/203 - 11/30/2023 revealed Ativan Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Lorazepam) Give 1 tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility 1) Failed to store and handle medications in accordance with acceptable pharmaceutical standards of practice for one of 2 medication rooms, 2) Failed to ensure that medication refrigerators were clean and temperatures outside of acceptable parameters were addressed, 3) Failed to ensure that controlled medications had administration orders, and 4) Failed to ensure that medications were stored according to professional standards of practice, including vaccinations, resulting in the potential for contamination of medications, incorrect administration of medications, a lack of therapeutic benefits necessary to promote healing for residents, increase the potential for adverse effects. Findings Include: FACILITY Medication Storage and Labeling On 12/15/23 at 8:38 AM, during a tour of the 2 north medication storage room with Nurse Q the following was observed: 1 refrigerator/fridge seal was broken around the inside door; about a 3 inch area was ripped. There was a dead fly in the bottom of the fridge. The refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely treatment and care for a contagious rash for two residents (Resident #127 and Resident #135), resulting in the potential worsening of symptoms, a decline in condition and spread of infection. Findings Include: Resident #127: A review of Resident #127 revealed an admission into the facility on 8/31/22 and re-admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, dementia, heart disease, diabetes, psychotic disorder, mood disorder, Alzheimer's disease and atopic dermatitis. A review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed the Resident had severely impaired cognition and needed substantial/maximal assistance with most ADL's. A review of Resident #127's progress notes included the following: -Dated 12/11/23 at 0800 AM, Skin/Wound note, Writer spoke with (Facility Doctor) yesterday morning regarding rash and (Dermatologist) coming to facility tonight. Writer received request to refer (Resident #127) back to (Dermatologist) as he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$68,445 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $68,445 — penalty dated 2023-12-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-23 for 3 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COUNTY OF LAPEER | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/1971 |
| BAKER, SHEA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/28/2020 |
| WEBER, MARY SUE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 11/01/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.