McLaren Lapeer Region

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

74.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 187 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.96 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 19 beds and averages 17.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 4.51 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.20 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 4.94 to 3.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 09/02/2025 at 9:35AM during the initial kitchen tour with the Certified Dietary Manager B, observed three separate spray nozzles downstream of atmospheric vacuum breakers located at the dishwasher station. On 09/02/2025 at 11:30am during lunch observation, observed Dietary Staff C reach in her pocket for a pen with gloves on, then proceed to don an additional pair of gloves without washing hands. On 09/02/2025 at 11:30am -12:00pm observed Dietary Staff C remove one pair of gloves after stepping away from the tray line and then proceeded to don an additional pair of gloves without washing hands. Dietary staff C was observed to be wearing two pairs of gloves at the same time. On 09/02/2025 at 11:30am -12:00pm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and change bandages for two residents Resident #9 and Resident #32) out of two residents reviewed for bandages, resulting in old or undated bandages going unchanged and assessed. Findings include: Resident #9 On 9/02/2025, at 1:26 PM, Resident #9 was sitting at their bedside. They had a large band aid to their right elbow. The band aid was undated and appeared old. Resident #9 offered that they had fallen at home prior and that was why they went to the hospital prior to the long-term care unit. On 9/03/2025, at 8:30 AM, a record review of Resident #9's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized weakness, gastrointestinal bleeding and chronic kidney disease. Resident #9 required assistance with activities of daily living and had a slight cognitive deficit. A review of the skin care plan revealed Other: ST (skin tear) to R (right) Lower arm. A review of the physician orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assessment and Process Improvement (QAPI) meetings were held quarterly, resulting in the lack of identification of concerns in the facility or corrective action being provided and no monitoring of issues, potentially affecting all residents living in the facility. Findings Include: FACILITY QAPI and QAA On 9/09/2024 at 3:54 PM, the Director of Nursing/DON was interviewed about the facility Quality Assurance Process Improvement/ QAPI program. When asked how often the QAPI committee met, the DON said the committee was supposed to meet quarterly and showed 2 meeting sign in sheets for a QAPI meeting in May 2024 and June 2024. She said she started at the facility in June 2024 and when she looked for the QAPI committee meeting minutes and sign in sheets, there were none. The DON said the interim DON had a meeting in May 2024 and she had a meeting in June 2024, but there were no meeting sign in sheets prior to that. The DON said she did not know if the committee met quarterly over the past year. A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-09 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00141690. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform assessments and perform ongoing monitoring of all bed rails to identify potential areas of entrapment for all facility residents including the following residents: #'65, #70, #115, #116, and #120, resulting in the potential for zones of entrapment to remain unidentified, posing a risk to all 15 residents. Findings Include: Resident #65: A record review of the medical record, indicated Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of falls with left knee fracture, arthritis, neck pain, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and macular degeneration. On 9/03/2024 at 11:33 AM, Resident #65 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in the day room waiting for lunch. She said she had a history of falls at home, and her left knee cap had a fracture. She said she was at the facility for therapy. On 9/9/2024 at 11:37 AM, the Maintenance Technician L was interviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that needs were being accommodated for three residents [Resident # 70 (R70), Resident #116 (R116), and Resident #120 (R120)], including comfortable room temperatures for Resident #70 and Resident #120, a request for a room change for Resident #116 and a request for a wider bed for Resident #120 of a total sample of 15 residents, resulting in discomfort and being unable to get enough rest and sleep for Resident #116, feeling unsafe to move and afraid of falling out of a narrow bed for Resident #120 and feeling too cold in the room for Resident #70 and Resident #120. Findings include: FACILITY Resident #120 (R120): Environment R120, on 09/03/24 at 11:59 AM, complained about the room being so cold upon admission. R120 complained to staff about the room temperature since admission on [DATE], but nothing has been done. R120's roommate (in room [ROOM NUMBER]), Resident #121, was interviewed on 9/3/24 at 2:30 PM. R121 agreed that the room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00141690 and MI00145384, Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment with adequate supervision and implement interventions to prevent a fall for two residents (Resident #14 and Resident #119) and failed to do a complete investigation for both residents resulting in Resident #14 sustaining multiple rib fractures after a fall and a potential for pain and a decline in medical condition and the likelihood of fall with injury to recur due to incomplete investigations for both Resident #14 and Resident #119. Findings include: Accidents Resident #14 (R14): According to the review of electronic medical records (EMR) on 9/4/24 at 1:00 PM, R14 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the skilled nursing facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Postoperative (Postop) ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) of the left trimalleolar fracture with general weakness in addition to other diagnosis. On 5/10/24, the facility assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to appropriately store supplies in one Clean Utility/ Medication Storage Room of one room reviewed and ensure that one Medication/Treatment Cart of two carts reviewed was properly secured and that confidential resident information was secured, resulting in the potential for use of contaminated and outdated supplies and access to residents' medications and confidential information. Findings Include: FACILITY Medication Storage and Labeling A review of the facility medication carts with Nurse J, on 9/4/2024 at 2:00 PM, identified a medication cart unattended in the hallway outside of the day room with several medication drawers open; the medication cart was unlocked. In addition, resident information was on the computer screen: visible to anyone nearby. Nurse J shut the medication cart drawers, closed the computer screen and ensured the cart was locked. She said she thought Nurse D had stepped away from the cart and was in the medication room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Infection Prevention and Control standards of practice were followed for 1). Hand Hygiene and Personal Protective Equipment/PPE use for one resident (Resident #120), 2.) a Water Management program specific to the facility, and 3.) Pneumonia and COVID Vaccination consent was not obtained and administered for one resident (Resident #71), resulting in the potential for the spread of infection, which could cause serious illness. Findings Include: FACILITY Infection Control: On 9/05/2024 at 9:38 AM, during an interview with the Infection Preventionist/IP A she was asked about the facilities Water Management Program. The IP A said the maintenance department in the hospital handled the Legionella water testing for the facility and it was last performed in the summer. She said she had seen the results and had communication with the Maintenance Director. IP A was asked for a copy of the Water Management Plan and she said the hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans to guide the care provided to 8 residents (Resident #7, Resident #58, Resident #59, Resident #60, Resident #62, Resident #108, Resident #110, and Resident #112) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the failure to provide instructions to the staff for effective and person -centered care to promote well-being and manage care needs. Findings Include: Resident #7: Death: A record review of the Face sheet and progress notes indicated Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and died on 6/28/2023 with diagnoses: Myopathy, diabetes, heart failure, thrombocytopenia, candidal esophagitis, gastritis, dysphagia, hypertension, arthritis, and weakness. The Minimum Data Set assessment was not completed, as the resident was only in the facility for a few days. A record review of a Nursing note dated 6/26/2023 at 5:26 PM, revealed Resident #7 spoke with her family and physician and requested Hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food products were properly labeled with an Opened on and Use by dates and dispose of expired food items, resulting in the potential for bacterial harborage and food borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food prepared in the kitchen for a census of 11 Residents. Findings include: On 7/11/23 at 7:55 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Retail Manager (DRM) T. The walk-in refrigerated unit was reviewed with the DRM. An open container of mushrooms were observed with a received date on 6/26/23 and a use by date on 7/3/23. The container had been opened and past the use by date. The DRM removed the mushrooms from the refrigerated unit. Sliced jalapeno peppers had been placed into a plastic container. The container had no open date or use by date on the container. The DRM was questioned about the kitchen policy of labeling food items. The DRM reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MI