Marywood Nursing Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 473 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 95.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.22 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2706540Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve hot liquids in a safe manner for one resident (R700) out of three reviewed for accidents, resulting in a second-degree burn blister. Findings include:A review of an incident investigation dated noted the following, IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) incident investigation. On 12/15/2025 resident spilled hot soup onto [their] lap. Nursing assessment was completed including skin assessment and pain assessment. No pain or injury at the time of the incident. Resident alert and orientated and continued to deny pain. Nursing assessment completed every shift with no redness or pain noted. On 12/18/2025, blister developed to the right medial thigh and new order received for triad daily and PRN (As needed) until resolved. Nursing assessment completed every shift with continued denial of pain, redness, etc .Further review of the progress notes revealed the following, 12/15/2025 11:50 am, Nursing Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intake #2680166.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure after visit care was provided for two residents (R900, R903) of three residents reviewed for continuity of care. Findings include:R900On 12/4/24, R900 was admitted to the facility the following diagnoses: fracture right femoral neck and fracture of right greater trochanter requiring surgical intervention, and severe osteopenia. R900's Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 12/8/24 revealed intact cognition.On 12/2/25, a review of the After Visit Summary (AVS) from the hospital transfer revealed resident instructions included under the heading, Activity: Do not sit for longer than 30-45 minutes, use chair with arms, and don't sit in low chairs. Sleep on back, legs slightly apart on your side with a pillow between legs for about 6 weeks.do not sleep on your stomach or affected hip. Further review under the heading, Ice and Elevation, put ice or a cold pack on the area for 10 to 20 minutes every 1 to 2 hours for the next 3 days while awake. The AVS further revealed that R900…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident requests were honored timely or in a dignified manner for one resident (R135) of two residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include:On 09/09/2025 at 12:35 PM, R135 was observed to be dressed and seated in their wheelchair in the hallway outside their room. R135 self-propelled their wheelchair with their arms and feet into the common area between the nurse station and the doorway to the cafe. R135 asked how to get up to the front door of the building as they wanted to go outside. R135 then reported to an unidentified female staff wearing blue scrubs that they would like to go outside. The staff member promptly said the resident could not go outside and indicated the nurses needed to know where R135 was and R135 would have to notify the nurse or get activities to help them. R135 continued up the hallway toward the doorway. Staff E then walked toward R135 from the main hall and R135 asked them about going outside.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure confidential medical records for one resident (R139) out of one reviewed for confidential information. Findings include: On 9/8/2025 at 8:30 AM, the laptop located on the B300 hallway cart was observed to be open and visible with patient Medication Administration Record (MAR) displayed. The nurse was not observed to be in the hallway or near the cart. On 9/9/2025 at 8:58 AM, the laptop located on the B300 hallway portable cart was observed to be open with patient Medication Administration Record (MAR) information visible. Registered Nurse (RN) A was not observed to be in the hallway or near the cart. On 9/9/2025 at 11:15 AM, the laptop located on the B300 hallway portable cart was observed to be open with patient MAR information visible. RN A was noted to be in a patient's room. RN A acknowledged the screen was unlocked and stated they would close it when they walked away. On 9/9/2025 at 1:27 PM, the laptop located on the B300 hallway cart was observed to be open with R139's MAR information visible. RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during medication administration for three residents (R134, R84 and R30) of five residents observed during the medication pass. Findings include: On 09/09/2025 at 9:20 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J was observed to check the vital signs of R134 and then return to the medication cart and prepare medications for the resident. LPN J then placed on gloves and brought the medications into the room and started to administer them to R134. R134 needed additional water to take their milk of magnesia and LPNJ went to the medication cart, doffed their gloves, poured water from a pitcher into a cup, donned a pair of gloves and re-entered the room and administered the medication. No hand hygiene was completed. R134 required additional water so LPN J returned to the medication cart, removed their gloves, poured a cup of water from the pitcher and donned a pair of gloves and re-entered the room of R134. No hand hygiene was completed. LPN J completed the medication pass and upon exit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intake M100152463: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete medical record for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for medical records. Findings Include: Review of Intake called into the State Agency revealed an allegation that R901 had been discharged from the facility on 04/21/25 and upon review of the home health care admission assessment on 04/22/25, R901 was found to have an intravenous line (IV) remaining in their arm. The report indicated the home care nurse reviewed the facility discharge record which indicated the IV had been physician ordered to be removed on 04/09/25. Review of the facility record for R901 revealed an admission date of 04/08/25 with diagnoses including Right Knee Effusion and Syncope and Collapse. R901's Physician orders included an order dated 04/08/25 stating Discontinue IV in right arm. On 06/04/25 at 9:59 AM, the complainant was interviewed via phone call and confirmed they were contacted by the home care admission nurse who reported the presence of the IV in R901's arm. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to Intake MI00147487 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R700) of three residents reviewed from abuse. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 5:05 PM, R700 was interviewed via phone and explained on 9/20/24 two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) were transferring R700 from their wheelchair to their bed and injured R700's toes. A review of R700's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Spinal Stenosis. A review of R700's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of R700s record revealed the following nursing progress note dated 9/20/24: Resident complained of hitting (their) right foot toe against the wheelchair when being transfer to bed. Writer and Nurse assistance transferred resident from the wheelchair to bed but did not observe resident hitting (their) toe. Writer assessed resident's foot for any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to Intake MI00147487. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R700) of three residents reviewed from abuse. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 5:05 PM, R700 was interviewed via phone and explained on 9/20/24 two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) were transferring R700 from their wheelchair to their bed and injured R700's toes. A review of R700's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Spinal Stenosis. A review of R700's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of R700s record revealed the following nursing progress note dated 9/20/24: Resident complained of hitting (their) right foot toe against the wheelchair when being transfer to bed. Writer and Nurse assistance transferred resident from the wheelchair to bed but did not observe resident hitting (their) toe. Writer assessed resident's foot for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00146357. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for two sampled residents (R321 and R403) and five anonymous residents from a total sample of 20. Findings include: On 08/28/24 at 1:47 PM, during a group meeting, anonymous resident (AR) G reported they felt there were not enough aides most of the time and they were not answering call lights timely. AR H reported (certified nursing assistants) CNA's on the afternoon and night shifts were taking too long to answer call lights. AR I agreed and said some staff are on their phones talking instead of caring for residents. AR I also added weekends are a concern for call lights not answered timely. AR J commented staffing seemed worse than the last time they were at the facility. The residents reported call lights were not answered in a timely fashion, saying 10 minutes as reasonable. They indicated the wait time for answering call lights was getting longer. Another resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intake: MI00146299. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss for one resident (R309) of one reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: A review of R309's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 6/30/24, and discharged on 8/3/24 with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Unspecified Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Heart Failure. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required extensive assistance for bathing and bed mobility. R309 was independent with eating. Further review of R309's medical record revealed the following dietary progress notes: 7/1/2024 16:20 (4:20pm) Dietary Progress Note admission: Resident is [identifying information] . Current diet is cardiac 2GM (gram) w/ HS (nighttime) snack offered. Resident has natural teeth in fair repair. Denies problems chewing, swallowing, or pocketing with meals but has a history of dysphagia & most recent hx (history) of weakness. Will add cut-up meats for ease Resident reports…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient practice number one: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened biologicals, inhalers and or eyedroppers were labeled with the date opened and or a resident identifier in four of four medications carts reviewed. Findings include: On 08/28/24 at 8:55 AM, the C100 wing medication cart was reviewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. A Trelegy Inhaler was not dated with the opened date nor a resident identifier. On 08/28/24 at 9:52 AM, the B100 medication cart was reviewed with LPN D. A Trelegy inhaler was not labeled on the actual inhaler with the date opened nor a resident identifier. The box was also not dated with the date opened. On 08/28/24 at 9:45 AM, the S300 Hall medication cart was reviewed with Registered Nurse (RN) F. Medications identified without open dates were: Two eyedroppers of Latanoprost; One eyedropper bottle of artificial tears; One eyedropper bottle of Moxicillin and one Advair inhaler. RN F…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FELICIAN SERVICES — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $8K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI