Schoolcraft Medical Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 64.4 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) 2631248Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions and physician recommendations/orders to prevent one Resident (#1) with a known history of elopement of three residents reviewed for elopement from eloping from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy when Resident #1 eloped from the facility and was found 1.2 miles away and was missing for approximately 2 hours, resulting in the likelihood of series injury, harm or death.Findings include:The Immediate Jeopardy began at 12:16 p.m. on 9/28/25 when R1 eloped from the facility undetected and was reported by a facility staff member to be located at a fast-food restaurant, 1.2 miles away at 2:10 pm. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 10/8/25 at 2:10 PM. At that time, an immediacy removal plan was requested from the facility. This surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive infection control program to mitigate the spread of Norovirus during an outbreak by failure to: 1. Implement effective disinfection of the facility. 2. Perform outbreak surveillance to track and mitigate the spread of Norovirus. 3. Adhere to Hand Hygiene Infection Control Principles. This deficient practice resulted in a sustained outbreak affecting 18 Residents out of a total facility census of 63 residents who contracted Norovirus. Residents (R26 and R44) were hospitalized from the outbreak. The failure to mitigate the outbreak also resulted in identification of sustained transmission of Norovirus with two additional Residents confirmed by facility staff who tested positive on 1/8/25. Findings include: On 1/1/25, three Residents (#8, #44, & #250), developed symptoms of emesis (vomiting) and diarrhea. Resident #44 (R44) was sent to the hospital on 1/2/25 and was confirmed positive for Norovirus infection and was subsequently admitted to the hospital. The Infection Preventionist…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide comprehensive diabetic management for one Resident (R60) of one resident reviewed for diabetic care. This deficient practice resulted in harm when R60 was hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Finding include: On 10/4/23, R60 was hospitalized with severe hyperglycemia (high blood glucose levels) and encephalopathy (brain dysfunction that can appear as confusion, memory loss personality changes and/or coma) due to hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state [HHS] (a metabolic complication of diabetes mellitus characterized by severe hyperglycemia, extreme dehydration, and altered consciousness.) Review of R60's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment, dated 6/14/23, revealed R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15, reflective of intact cognition. R60 was responsible for her own medical decisions, and was documented with clear speech, the ability to understand others and be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-09 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) information to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate reporting of staffing levels with the potential to affect all 53 residents. Findings include: Review of CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report FY (fiscal year) Quarter 4 2024 (July 1 -September 30) revealed the metric No RN (Registered Nurse) Hours, Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, One Star Staffing Rating, and Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day Triggered with the following infraction dates being: No RN hours every day beginning with 7/1/24 through 9/30/24. Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24/Hours/Day every day beginning with 7/1/24 through 9/30/24 During an interview on 1/9/25 at 9:59 a.m., Human Resource Manager F stated, I input the information for the PBJ report . we switched companies to take our data and convert it and send it to CMS .we did find out that it did not work. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 10:27 a.m., Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146197. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the identification and reporting of potential abuse for five Residents (#10, #12, #14, #18 and #20) of six residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for unidentified abuse and further exposure to abusive situations. Findings include: Resident #10 (R10) R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. Review of R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/2024, revealed R10 was independent with transfers and ambulation. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R10 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of R10's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following: 6/11/2024 23:02 [11:02 p.m.] Nurses Note. Resident [complained of] hand broken after being redirected from another resident's room . DON [Director of Nursing] notified . 6/12/2024 07:57 [7:57 a.m.] Nurses Note. Writer in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146197. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for five Residents (#10, #12, #14, #18 and #20) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #10 (R10) R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. Review of R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/15/2024, revealed R10 was independent with transfers and ambulation. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R10 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of R10's incident reports for April 1, 2024, through August 19, 2024, provided by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), revealed the following: Injury of Unknown Source . Incident Description: Called into unit, CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] upset, stated [R10] was in a female resident's bed and that she tried to get him out he punched her in the leg and called her a name. Sent CNA on break and in to assess resident. Resident unable to give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain adequate resident and employee infection surveillance based on current professional standards for Infection Control (IC). This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to a facility COVID-19 infection outbreak, and the potential for ongoing infection spread, with the potential to affect all 58 facility residents. Findings include: Review of the November 2023, Infection Surveillance Monthly Report, showed 25 residents had respiratory infections, with 23 HAI's (Health Associated Infections - obtained in a health care facility after admission). The infection column showed 22 COVID-19 infections marked. When each column was followed to the right to the comments section, to show 21 residents tested positive for COVID, with infections resolved. There was no infection visual location mapping provided, which showed trends/clusters, locations of residents (rooms) with infections, or the potential for contact tracing. The monthly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #MI00142455. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent employee to resident abuse for two Residents (R3, R22) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in the abuse of R22, and the potential for ongoing abuse of R3 and other facility residents. Findings include: Review of R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/25/24, revealed R22 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including stroke and depression. R22 required one-person assistance with transfers and bed mobility and was independent with toileting. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 11/15, which showed R22 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R3's MDS assessment, dated 12/14/23, revealed R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes, thyroid disorder, arthritis, depression, and anxiety. R3 was independent with bed mobility and transfers and required moderate assistance for toileting.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation relates to Intake #MI00142455. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and report abuse to prevent employee to resident abuse for two Residents (R3, R22) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of R22's Investigation report, dated 1/31/24 at 2:21 p.m., revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B discovered bruising on R22's arms and notified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. R22 was tearful when interviewed and reported a CNA (identified as CNA H) was rough with her during cares and she did not feel safe when CNA H was working with her. LPN A observed the bruising appeared to be fingerprints on R22's upper arms. The report showed other residents were interviewed for potential abuse. R3 reported CNA H hollered at her and pointed her finger at her and stated she did not want CNA H to work with her. Review of R22's police report, dated 1/29/24 at 12:04 p.m., described how R22 said when a staff person was assisting her rolling over in bed, CNA H was too aggressive and bruised her. The Officer reported they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician's orders were obtained and communication/documentation occurred for coordination of care for hospice services provided to two Residents (R6 and R13) of two Residents reviewed for hospice services. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for a lack of coordination of comprehensive services and unmet needs. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) A review of the medical record for R6 revealed an admission date of 4/13/18. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R6 was receiving hospice services. The Resident Roster printed on 2/12/24 denoted R6 was on hospice. During an interview on 2/12/24 at approximately 12:05 PM, Family Member L stated R6 started on hospice services in December 2023. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was reviewed and there was not a Physician order for Hospice Services. On 02/14/24 at 12:17 PM, the hospice resident folder in R6's room did not include calendar entries for January or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure the mechanical dish machine was properly sanitizing food contact surfaces, including plates, glasses, flatware and cooking utensils. 2. Failing to ensure food service staff properly washed their hands following contamination and returning to food related tasks. 3. Failing to ensure all food staff properly had their hair restrained. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all 46 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 1/31/23 at approximately 1:30 PM, observations of the mechanical dish machine were made and determined the machine was a high temperature sanitizing type with a conveyor mechanism. This type of machine requires a series of cycles of hot water to ensure that food contact surfaces are properly sanitized by the surface reaching a minimum temperature of 160°F. Dietary Aide (DA) I was conducting dish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive, person-centered care plans for four Residents (#9, #29, #37 and #44) of 14 residents reviewed for care planning. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unidentified and unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #9 A review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/02/2022, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including heart failure and chronic pain syndrome. Further review the MDS assessment revealed in the five days prior to the assessment, Resident #9 received scheduled and as needed (prn) pain medication, and non-medication interventions to treat pain. The MDS assessment also revealed Resident #9 experienced Shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion during the assessment lookback period. Resident #9 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. An observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were properly donning and doffing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while entering and exiting COVID-19 isolation rooms. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for further spread of COVID-19 to the entire facility population. Findings include: On 1/31/23 at 12:35 p.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) T was observed entering and exiting rooms during meal tray delivery service on the COVID-19 and Influenza unit. CNA T was observed entering and exiting room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident #39) on the SNU (resident unit designation) unit, who was positive for COVID-19, with only the upper strap of the N95 (Direct Supply-Brand Name) secured, the bottom strap was hanging loose in front of the mask. On 1/31/23 at 12:40 p.m., CNA T then entered and exited room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident #24) on the SNU unit with a different N95 (Makrite-Brand Name) and failed to ensure the metal nose stay (bendable metal strip) was formed to the face. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$63,492 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $63,492 — penalty dated 2025-01-09
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-08 for 12 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-15 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $73K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI