Norlite Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 80.5 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-28 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary equipment was readily available to provide care for two dependent Residents (#62 and #46) out of 18 residents reviewed for quality of life. This deficient practice resulted in emotional distress, feelings of frustration, social isolation, and physical discomfort.Findings include:Resident #62 (R62)Review of R62's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 3/8/23 with diagnoses including hemiparesis (partial weakness, reduced strength, and/or impaired motor function on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke), multiple sclerosis (MS), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of R62's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition.On 1/26/2026 at 4:03 PM, R62 was observed in bed lying in bed with greasy, unkempt hair.On 1/26/2026 at 4:06 PM, an interview was conducted with R62 regarding overall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a Resident-to-Resident physical abuse, resulting in minimal harm for one Resident (R38) of two residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in numerous bruising sites and persistent fear of further abuse. Findings include: Intake Number: MI00139309 Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 9/10/23, revealed the following, .On 9/10/23 at 1556 (3:56 p.m.), (R50) exited his room on foot wearing socks, a shirt, and his brief. He glanced up the hall for a moment, and then proceeded to walk across the hall into (R38's) room. This had occurred 3 times prior in the past two weeks per (R38's) report. Upon seeing (R50) in her room again, (R38) removed her TB headphones and said to (R50), This isn't your room. Go back to your room. (R50) became agitated with (R38's) request, and began grabbing, slapping, and flailing at (R38), causing bruising to her R (right) thigh and pain in her upper arms and face. Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to address the care, needs, and safety of the entire facility population. This deficient practice resulted in unmet care needs and the potential for serious safety issues for all 82 residents of the facility.Findings include:On 1/27/26 at 2:05 PM, a confidential group interview was conducted regarding overall perception of nurse staffing levels. Six out of 14 confidential residents (CR's) expressed concerns with receiving timely assistance for care needs as well as the timely passing of meal trays. One CR stated, The place is understaffed, indicating Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were often assigned to cover more than one hallway. CR10 stated the staffing shortage usually gets worse on the weekends.Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed the following:1/6/26: .Old Business: . [Facility name] is looking to hire more CNAs to help with the shortage in nursing help concern.12/2/25: .Old…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat five Residents (#10, #30, #35, #37, & #56) with a dignified dining experience out of 18 residents reviewed for dignity. This deficient practice resulted in a lack of personal dignity and feelings of embarrassment based on the reasonable person. Findings include: During dining observation on 1/27/26 the following was observed: Resident #37 (R37) At approximately 12:17 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Z was observed assisting R37 with a lunch meal in their room. LPN Z was seated next to R37 and was noted to have blue gloves on during the meal service. Resident #10 (R10) At approximately 12:23 p.m., Dining Assistant/Staff BB was observed assisting R10 with a lunch meal in their room. Staff BB was seated next to R10 and was noted to have blue gloves on during the meal service. Resident #56 (R56) At approximately 1:09 p.m., Dietary Aide/Staff AA was observed assisting R56 with a lunch meal in the hallway. Staff AA was seated next to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0559 — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide advanced written notification of a room change for 3 Confidential Residents (CR's) of 14 residents during the resident group interview and one Resident (#6) of one resident reviewed for room changes.Findings include:Resident #6 (R6)Review of R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder.Review of Section C: Cognitive Patterns in the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R6, dated 11/10/25, ranked Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making as, Moderately impaired-decisions poor; cues/supervision required.On 1/27/2026 at 9:56 AM, an interview was conducted with the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) FF for R6 regarding any care concerns at the facility. DPOA FF indicated the facility had changed R6's room, awhile back without any explanation or written notification.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment by ensuring resident room temperatures were maintained within the acceptable parameters for two Confidential Residents (CR's) out of 14 residents from a resident group interview and 2 Residents (#39 & #62) of 18 residents reviewed for environmental concerns.Findings include:Resident #62 (R62)Review of R62's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 3/8/23 with diagnoses including hemiparesis (partial weakness, reduced strength, and/or impaired motor function on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke), multiple sclerosis, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of R62's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/24/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition.On 1/26/2026 at 4:06 PM, an interview was conducted with R62 regarding overall satisfaction with care at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate food temperatures and palatability for nine Confidential Residents (CR) of fourteen residents reviewed for food satisfaction.Findings include:On 1/27/26 at 2:05 PM, food palatability, food choices, and mealtimes were discussed at a confidential group interview. 9 out of 14 residents stated their food is almost always cold. One CR stated, [Food] temperature is a problem. Another CR said, Last night's dinner was inedible it was so cold. 6 out of 14 residents stated meals were served at inconsistent times. Yet another CR stated, You have to guess [what time meals will be served]. During the lunch meal, which was specified to hallway trays only due to an infectious outbreak, the following was observed: Hallway trays began on the 500 hall at approximately 12:04 p.m. and ended at 12:14 p.m. It was observed that all meal trays were passed out to resident rooms, even when a resident was not in their room or hallway. Hallway trays began on the 300 hall at approximately 12:23 p.m. and ended at 12:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 1/27/2026 at 3:30 PM, three boxes of single serve items, including cups and lids, were observed sitting on the storage room floor. The boxes were opened with some of the contents used. When asked about deliveries, Dietary Manager (DM) T stated that the last delivery came in the day before.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 4-903.11 Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles. (A) Except as specified in (D) of this section, cleaned EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS, laundered LINENS, and SINGLE-SERVICE and SINGLEUSE ARTICLES shall be stored: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where they are not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor. (B) Clean EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS shall be stored as specified under (A) of this section and shall be stored: (1) In a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2687526.Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for one Resident (#90) of two residents reviewed for abuse resulting in R82 grabbing R90's head, and based on the reasonable person concept would cause feelings of pain, fear and intimidation for Resident #90.Findings include:Review of an Anonymous Complaint to the State Agency dated 12/8/2025 at 1:58 PM read in part: (R82) grabbed (R90's) head aggressively, (facility staff name omitted) and (facility staff name omitted) intervened between the two. Both nurses called (the Director of Nursing [DON]) immediately after reporting the incident. (The Nursing Home Administrator [NHA]) told (staff name omitted) that he watched the video and (R82) was 'petting' (R90's) head when that was not the case. This was a resident to resident not being reported by the facility .Resident #82 (R82)Review of an admission Record revealed R82, was originally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake# 2687526Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to fully implement its Abuse Program Policy and Procedure and immediately identify and thoroughly investigate incidents of resident to resident abuse for 2 Residents (Residents #82 & #90) from 18 residents reviewed for abuse and based on the reasonable person concept would cause feelings of pain, fear and intimidation for Residents #90, and the potential for continued resident abuse to go unreported and/or undetected.Findings include:Review of an Anonymous Complaint to the State Agency dated 12/8/2025 at 1:58 PM read in part: (R82) grabbed (R90's) head aggressively, (facility staff name omitted) and (facility staff name omitted) intervened between the two. Both nurses called (the Director of Nursing [DON]) immediately after reporting the incident. (The Nursing Home Administrator [NHA]) told (staff name omitted) that he watched the video and (R82) was 'petting' (R90's) head when that was not the case. This was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2687526.Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act and as a result of the facility's failure to implement the facility Abuse Policy and ensure resident safety, resulted in R82's physical abuse to continue and placed all residents at risk for serious injury, physical and psychosocial harm, and impairment.Review of an Anonymous Complaint to the State Agency dated 12/08/2025 1:58 PM read in part: (R82) grabbed (R90's) head aggressively, (facility staff name omitted) and (facility staff name omitted) intervened between the two. Both nurses called (Director of Nursing-DON) immediately after reporting the incident. (Nursing Home Administrator-NHA) told (staff name omitted) that he watched the video and (R82) was petting (R90's) head when that was not the case. This was a resident to resident not being reported by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent wandering residents entering private resident rooms resulting in feelings of frustration for five Confidential Residents (CR's) out of 14 residents in a confidential group interview and one Resident (#10) out of 18 residents reviewed for quality of care.Findings include:On 1/27/26 at 2:05 PM, a confidential group interview was conducted where several residents voiced their frustration regarding wandering residents entering their personal living quarters. One CR stated, wandering residents came into their room so often, I can't keep my door open. When asked if it takes staff a long time for staff to redirect the resident out of their room, the CR stated, I redirect her because I don't want her near me. She follows me around all day. Another CR added, Yes, there's a problem with wanderers. She [the same resident mentioned above] stares at me and watches what I'm doing. I usually have to redirect…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$113,129 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $113,129 — penalty dated 2023-12-14
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-26 for 48 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $334K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI