Bronson Commons

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 418 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 280 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.43 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.45 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.62 to 1.01 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: #2790330, #2794131, #2798407Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to 1.) accurately assess and prevent an elopement of 1 (Resident #100) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement risk, resulting in an immediate jeopardy when Resident #100 left the premises on 2/14/26 at 5:04 AM, alone, unbeknownst to staff and was later located by staff at 5:55 AM approximately 100 yards from the facility; 2). Ensure safety during a mechanical lift transfer to 1(Resident #104) of 2 residents reviewed for safe transfers resulting in a fall with a head laceration.Findings include:The immediate jeopardy began on 2/13/26 and was identified on 3/11/26 when the facility failed to ensure the safety of and prevent an elopement for Resident #100 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and inaccurately assessed as not being an elopement risk. Resident #100 subsequently eloped from the building on 2/14/26 at 5:04 AM and was found by staff at 5:55 AM, the same day,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00151630 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer techniques were implemented for 2 (Resident #172 and #65) of 4 residents reviewed for falls resulting in a fall with a hand laceration and a fracture for Resident #172 and an improper transfer with a slide board resulting in bruising on the bilateral (both) upper arms for Resident #65. Findings include: Resident #172 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #172 was a female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #172's a Level of Assistance flowsheet revealed Resident #172 was limited assistance for transfer assistance with Therapy Recommendations including Front wheeled walker; Wheelchair-manual; Gait Belt; Verbal cues. Review of Resident #172's Radiology Report dated 3/16/25 revealed, .IMPRESSION: Suspected acute periprosthetic fracture (a break in the bone near an orthopedic implant) is along the distal femoral shaft (lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) served full time in the role of Director of Nursing potentially affecting all 89 residents that reside in the facility.Findings include:On 3/10/26 at 9:50 AM, surveyors entered the facility and were met by Staff Development/Registered Nurse (SD/RN) III. Surveyors requested to meet with either the Nursing Home Administrator and/or the Director of Nursing and SD/RN III reported the NHA and DON were the same person.On 3/10/26 at 9:55 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B while meeting with survey team in the conference room, reported she was also the Executive Director/Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A at this time.In an interview on 3/11/26 at 7:42 AM, DON B reported she had held the position of DON for about 5 years, and in August of 2025, the previous NHA vacated the position and she assumed the role. DON B reported she has been the only person in both roles since the previous NHA left until present. DON B reported here role as DON included auditing and education, new processes, policy updates,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform residents and/or educate residents and effectively implement the grievance process for six of six residents from a confidential group meeting and all 85 residents that reside in the facility, resulting in the potential for residents to not meet their highest practicable level of wellbeing due to grievances not being documented, tracked, and the results of conclusions and/or resolutions not being recorded. Findings include: During a confidential group meeting on 06/11/25 at 10:34 AM, six of six residents reported that they talked about the same concerns month after month in resident council meetings. These residents also reported that they were not aware that they could have their private concerns documented on a form, that staff could assist them to complete the form, and/or that they could complete a concern form anonymously. The residents did not know that there were forms available and reported that they would utilize the concern forms if they had access to them. During an observation on 06/11/25 at 11:25 AM in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #13 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #13 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: cancer, heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), anxiety and depression (persistent depressed mood or loss of interest in activities causing significant impairment in daily life). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 with a reference date of 4/26/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Section N of the MDS revealed Resident #13 received antianxiety, antidepressant, a diuretic (drug that causes the kidneys to make more urine) and opioid (class of drug used to reduce moderate to severe pain) medications. Review of a Care Plan for Resident #13 with a reference date of 5/14/24, revealed a problem/goal/interventions of: Problem: I use my medication to help me manage my diagnosis. I want to avoid any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) cares and assistance were provided per resident preference for 1 (Residents #17) of 2 residents reviewed for resident preferences, resulting in dissatisfaction with care and the potential for decline in sense of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17, with a reference date of 4/18/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #17 was cognitively intact. Review of the Functional Abilities revealed that Resident #17 was dependent for toileting and transfers. In an interview on 06/10/25 at 10:57 AM, Resident #17 reported that she had moved rooms so that she could had access to a ceiling mechanical lift that would allow her to transfer easier. Resident #17 reported that staff tell her that she cannot use the commode every time she has to use the bathroom, because it takes too much of their time. Resident #17 reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #17 Review of Resident #17's Physician Orders revealed, Lorazepam (Ativan) tablet 0.5 mg .Frequency: Daily as needed for anxiety .Duration: 30 days Start Date/Time (after last modification): 5/19/25 .End Date/Time: 6/18/25 . The most recent dose was given on 6/6/25 at 7:36 AM. An attempt to interview Medical Director (MD) III on 06/12/25 at 12:18 PM was made, with no return phone call prior to survey exit. This surveyor requested physician rationale for Resident #17's order for PRN (as needed) Lorazepam written for greater than 14 days at a time. Review of Resident #17's Psychiatry Progress Note dated 5/14/25 revealed, .states that she has had some increased anxiety due to some issues she is working through with staff, but the extra Xanax (sic) during the day helped .Staff report no new or clinically significant changes or concerns with mood or behaviors at this time .Generalized anxiety disorder: moderately stable .Continue Lorazepam 0.5 mg 1 tablet at 4:35 PM PRN anxiety x 30 days. GDR (gradual dose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess 1 (Resident #70) of 1 resident reviewed for minimum data set (MDS) discharge encoding resulting in inaccurate discharge location data being submitted. Findings include: Review of a Facesheet revealed Resident #70 was a female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: weakness and the need for personal assistance. Review of MDS for Resident #70 dated 3/19/25 revealed .A2000 discharge date [DATE], A2150 Discharge status, Code entered 04 indicating resident discharged to Short-Term General Hospital. Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed no noted documentation of a transfer from the facility to any hospital. In a telephone interview on 6/11/25 at 2:51 pm MDS Coordinator (MDSC) WW reported she was the nurse who had completed Resident #70's discharge MDS assessment. MDSC WW reviewed the MDS while on the phone and confirmed that she has coded Resident #70 as a short stay hospital discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for medication administration for 1 residents (Resident #3) of 18 reviewed for the provision of nursing services, resulting in medication not administered following physician ordered parameters, the lack of assessment, and the potential for medication adverse effects and complications Findings include: In an interview on 06/10/25 at 09:27 AM, Resident #3 reported that Registered Nurse (RN) E did not listen to her and/or follow the physician orders for her blood pressure medication. Resident #3 reported that the night before she had tried to tell RN E that her blood pressure was too low, and that she should not take her Apresoline (medication used to treat high blood pressure). Resident #3 reported that RN E still gave her the medication along with her other medications; Resident #3 felt dizzy and kept her eyes closed for a long time afterwards. In an interview on 06/10/25 at 09:17 AM, Unit Coordinator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide meaningful activities to promote psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 resident reviewed for activities. This deficient practice resulted in decreased feelings of connectedness to the community, a lack of meaningful leisure involvement and increased boredom. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #42 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: depression (persistent depressed mood or loss of interest in activities causing significant impairment in daily life). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 with a reference date of 10/8/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #42 was cognitively intact. Section F revealed it was very important for Resident #42 to choose her bedtime, be around pets, and to participate in her favorite activities. Review of a Care Plan for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of five residents (Resident #26) had water available at the bedside, resulting in the potential for dehydration. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #26 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that primarily affects memory, thinking and behavior) and renal insufficiency (disease in which the kidneys lost the ability to remove waster and balance fluids). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #26 with a reference date of 6/4/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 which indicated Resident #26 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a Care Plan for Resident #26 with a reference date of 9/25/19, revealed a problem/goal/interventions of: 1. Problem: Nutritional Status. Goal: My nutritional needs will be met through the next review. Interventions: Please…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were maintained during tube feeding administration for 1 (Resident #21) of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding administration resulting in the potential for introduction of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission. Findings include: Review of a Facesheet revealed Resident #21 was a female who had admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: cardiovascular accident (CVA/Stroke) and PEG (percutaneous gastrostomy tube/feeding tube). During an observation on 6/10/25 at 11:55 am, outside of Resident #21's room was a sign posted on the door frame indicating that the resident was in enhanced barrier precautions. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #21 revealed .diet order NPO (nothing by mouth) ordered 8/16/2024 .Isosource 1.5 bolus (single administration, all at one time) feed oral liquid 250mL (milliliters) via feeding tube four times a day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-08 for 21 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 33 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI