Martha T Berry MCF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 217 beds and averages 208.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.47 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented to prevent a fall with injury for one resident (R901) of three reviewed for falls. Findings include:This citation pertains to Intake 2661503.A review of a progress note by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A dated 10/05/25 at 12:38 PM, documented, Resident was observed lying in the hallway face down in a pile of blood. Writer (LPN A) assisted resident to (their) back then into wheelchair. Writer applied pressure to laceration on (right) R side of forehead and to bridge of nose . Writer asked resident what happened, and (they) began to cry stating that (their) head hurts. Writer applied pressure to bleeding areas until the ambulance arrived. Ambulance arrived and took resident to (hospital). Review of a post fall assessment by LPN A documented, .Post Fall Evaluation Late Entry: Fall Details: Date/Time of Fall: 10/05/2025 11:30 AM. Fall occurred in the hallway. Activity at the time of fall: Ambulating. Reason…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment including the availability of warm/hot water, for nine residents (R36, R81, R82, R85, R87, R89, R123, R136, and R160). Findings include:R36 On 3/31/26 at 9:45 AM, R36 was observed lying in bed watching television. R36 pointed to the foot of the bed and stated, Those holes bother me. I don't like that and I wish it was fixed. The footboard at the end of the bed was noted to have two large open areas where the laminate on the footboard was missing and loose. Further observation revealed, in the wall behind the bed was a large hole about 6 inches long and 3 inches wide. A record review revealed R36 was admitted on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses of Hypertension and Anxiety Disorder. R36's Brief Interview of Mental Status assessment score was 15/15 indicating intact cognition. On 4/01/26 at 10:30 AM, a tour of R36's room was conducted with the Housekeeping Director J and acknowledged the previously…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the invitation and inclusion in care conferences (participation in planning their own care) of one resident (R103) of two reviewed for care planning. Findings include: On 3/31/26 at 10:27 AM, R103 was asked about their satisfaction with the care and services they were receiving at the facility. R103 stated, I want to get out of here. R103 was asked if they had discussed this issue in their care conference meetings. R103 indicated that they had never attended a care conference meeting and didn't know anything about them. R103 expressed a desire to attend their care conferences. A record review of R103's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed documentation of care conferences being conducted regarding R103 on 11/5/25 and 2/11/26. There was no documentation which indicated the residents' invitation to the conference, attendance, refusal, or a reason why the resident was not in attendance at either care conference. Further review of R103's EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide timely repositioning and transfer assistance for two dependent residents (R85, R160) of three observed for quality of care. Findings include: R85On 03/31/2026 at 12:10 PM, 12:31 PM, 12:40 PM, and 1:17 PM, R85 was observed in the alcove dining area along with eight other residents. R85 was in a 'Broda' style wheelchair (designed for safer positioning and fall prevention). R85 was leaning toward the left side of the chair with the left shoulder lower toward the armrest. At 1:17 PM, R85's head was on the left side bolster, and the torso was leaned over to the left and scrunched down slightly. R85 did not respond to queries. At 1:36 PM, the left elbow was sticking out the back side of the wheelchair between the back support and side of the wheelchair. R85 moved their left leg up and down as it hung over the left arm of the wheelchair. At 2:08 PM, the chair had been leaned back to around 30-45 degrees. At 2:53 PM, R85 was observed in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply protective heel boots (footwear used to relieve pressure on the heel) for one resident (R147) out of five reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include:A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R147 revealed a physician's order last revised 8/28/2024 for R147 to have protective boots while in bed.Further review of the EMR revealed R147 was admitted to the facility 5/24/2022 with diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, contracture of right and left knees, chronic pain syndrome, and type two diabetes. Review of R147's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out 15, indicating fully intact cognition. Section M (Skin Conditions) revealed that the resident is at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries.On 03/31/2026 at 10:30 AM and 1:15 PM, R147 was observed lying in bed with no protective heel boots in place.On 04/01/2026 at 11:29 AM and 2:08 PM, R147 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an update for a preadmission screening (PAS) and resident review (ARR) /Hospital Exempted Discharge for a Level II evaluation was completed for one resident (R187) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed that R187 admitted into the facility on 9/18/24 with the following diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, post traumatic stress diorder and dissociative identity disorder. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] was completed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. A review of the medical record revealed a Preadmission Screening with a hospital exemption dated on 9/18/24. There was no change in condition for hospital discharge within 30 days and the PASSAR had not been updated. There was no additional PASARR forms nor was a Level II screening requested due to R187 having mental illness diagnoses. On 01/28/2025 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intakes MI00149363 and MI00149481. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a dental care plan for one resident (R110) out of one reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: On 01/27/25 at 10:00 AM R110 was observed laying in bed watching television. R110 was asked about dental care and stated they wanted teeth pulled at a dentist office, not the facility. A review of the medical record revealed R110 admitted into the facility on 1/05/2024 with the following diagnoses, Dysphagia, Malnutrition, Adult Personality Disorders, and Adjusment Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 1/9/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9/15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Further review of of R110's medical record revealed dental consultions and issues with they're teeth. There was no comprehensive dental care plan with interventions noted in the medical record. On 01/29/2025 at 1:00 PM, an interview was conducted with Social Worker A regarding R110's dental care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement skin interventions and date skin care treatments, for one sampled resident (R153) of three reviewed for skin. Findings include: On 1/27/25 at 1:34 PM, R153 was observed in their room sitting in a wheelchair. R153 was asked about the care at the facility and mentioned they need a new bandage strip. R153's right elbow was observed with a brown bandage on it without a date and intial, R153's right upper thigh was observed with a brown bandage on it without a date, and R153's right leg was observed with a discolored area that was not covered. R153 explained the facility has not followed up and changed the bandages for a few days. On 1/29/25 at 9:42 AM, R153's skin on the left leg was observed with a large red area that had a large blister that was not covered. R153 reported it was not covered on 1/28/25 and the bandage on their right elbow needed to be replaced because it fell off. On 1/29/25 at 9:45 AM, Unit Manager A was asked to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a deep tissue injury and subsequent stage 3 pressure ulcer ( full-thickness skin loss) for one resident (R49), of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 8:21 AM, R49 was observed in bed eating breakfast, heels flat on the bed. Attempts to interview the resident were to no avail as the resident was pleasantly confused. A review of R49's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Muscle Weakness, and Psychotic Disorder. Further review of R49's medical record revealed they were significantly cognitively impaired, and was dependent for bed mobility per their care plan initiated on 12/13/23. Further review of R49's medical record revealed they sustained a fall on 8/6/24 resulting in a left hip fracture. Further review of R49's medical record revealed the following progress notes:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate supervision, and effective fall interventions for one sampled resident (R117) of four residents reviewed for falls, resulting in multiple falls, and a hospitalization. Findings include: On 1/28/25 at 8:28 AM, R117 was observed in bed on their back, floor mats observed on both sides of the bed. Attempts to interview the resident was to no avail due to their cognition. A review of R117's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/6/23 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hypertension, and Muscle Weakness. Further review revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status score of 3/15, had a language barrier, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed the following progress notes related to unwitnessed falls: 9/17/2024 13:22 (1:22pm) Incident Note .Resident observed kneeling on [their] knees next to the bed on the floor mat by the activities lady.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a pain patch for one sampled resident (R28) of one review for medication administration. Findings include: On 1/27/25 at 1:36 PM, R28 was asked about the care at the facility and stated, Yesterday they didn't give me my pain patch. R28 reported this happens often. A review of R28's medical record revealed, R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). A review of R28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], noted R28 with an intact cognition and requires staff assistance to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). A review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2024 revealed, Lidocaine Patch 4 % Apply to the painful area topically one time a day for Musculoskeletal pain. Apply to the affected areas/painful region -Start Date 06/17/2023. On December 20th the MAR was marked with a 9 indicated see nurses notes (for reason why not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $378K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI