Maple Manor Rehab Center of Novi Inc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 315 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 196 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 57.7 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.07 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.86 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2714575Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper safety interventions to prevent falls for one resident (R501) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with injuries requiring a transfer to the hospital for skin tears and sutures to R501's forehead. Findings include:On 1/20/26 at 11:05 AM, a review of R501's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: a fall with femur fracture, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, and adjustment disorder. R501's fall risk assessment calculated on 12/9/25 scored them as an 18, with anything greater than 13 equating a high fall risk.A review of R501's progress notes was conducted and revealed a note entered into the record by Nurse 'D' on 1/7/26 at that read, At around 1:15 am, NOD (nurse on duty) heard a loud sound from (R501's room #). NOD found patients [sic] siting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective water management program, appropriately initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions and provide infection control practices with medication administration, this had the ability to affect all the resident's residing in the facility including six [R27, R85, R86, R87, R88 and R89] residents identified. Findings include, On 04/27/2026 at 10:15 AM, during a building tour with Maintenance Technician (MT) S and Director of Maintenance (DM) F observed four hot water tanks with setting at 130 degrees F. At this time DM F indicated that mixing valves are on resident point-of-use fixtures and monitored and logged. MT S and DM F indicated flushing protocols for unoccupied rooms but do not document this and have not identified other potential areas of stagnation for flushing. When asked about any additional control measures DM F said that legionella testing is done annually. On 04/27/2026 a Record Review of Maple Manor Rehab and Neuro…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake# 2788480 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two residents (R57 and R65) of five residents reviewed for environmental concerns, as well as the residents that utilized the central shower room, resulting in unclean floors and shower/resident rooms in disrepair. Findings include: On 04/27/2026 at approximately 10:33 a.m., R57 was observed in their room, laying in the bed. R57's floor was observed to have old food debris covering it. R57 was queried regarding their floor, and they reported that housekeeping was not doing a good job of moping the floor. At that time, R57's Baseboard by their hand sink was observed to be peeling away from the wall along with the corner drywall strips. On 04/27/2026 at approximately 11:08 a.m., R65 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R65's floor was observed to be sticky with darkened dirt spots covering it. On 4/29/2026 at approximately 10:40 a.m., R57 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R57's baseboard was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for medication administration for one resident (R83) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:On 4/28/26 at 8:43 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN A) was observed preparing the morning medications for a resident. When asked the resident's name, LPN A replied with the resident's room number and bed. When asked for the resident's name that resided in that room number and bed, LPN A replied with the resident's first name and stated they were not sure of the last name. At 8:52 AM, LPN A was observed to have handed R83 their medications to consume. The nurse failed to properly identify the resident.A review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration revised January 2026, documented in part . Ensure that the six right of medication administration are followed. Right resident. with MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify resident name.At 8:58 AM, LPN A asked R83 why they were not wearing their oxygen. R83 explained they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure preventive interventions were implemented as noted in the plan of care, for two residents at risk for development of pressure injuries (R's 3 & 65) of five residents reviewed for pressure injury. Findings include:R65 On 04/27/2026 at approximately 11:08 a.m., R65 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R65 was observed to have their feet with bilateral ace bandages on. No PRAFO boots (boots used to relieve pressure and prevent contractions) were observed applied to their legs/feet. R65's heels were observed to be touching the pedals of the wheelchair. On 4/27/26 at approximately 3:31 p.m., R65 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R65 was observed with their heels flushed to the mattress, without any protective boots providing relief from pressure. On 4/28/26 at approximately 11:32 a.m., R65 was observed in their room, sitting in their wheelchair. R65 was observed to be without any pressure relieving boots…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure infection control standards and practices were consistently implemented by the facility staff and failed to implement an effective infection control surveillance program for 47 or 47 (including Resident R14, R19, R5, R35, R2,R342 ad R24) residents residing at the facility during the time of the survey. Findings include: On 3/4/25 at approximately 8:35 AM, upon entrance into the facility. The receptionist informed the survey team that the facility was currently experiencing an Influenza outbreak and a surgical mask would have to be worn by all surveyors. On 3/4/25 at 9:18 AM, upon entry onto the second floor, a contained unit was observed. Two doors interlocked to the unit. Observed on the door was a signage informing all of Droplet Precautions. The signage informed staff and providers to wear a surgical mask and eye protection. The signage also noted for all visitors to speak with a nurse. On 3/4/25 at 9:20 AM, Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's 'wireless' call light communication system was fully operational and had adequate alternate interventions for residents to summons help. This deficient practice has the potential to effect all residents, including R142, R144, R143, R344, and one anonymous resident (AR). Findings include: R142 On [DATE] at 9:55 AM, the door to the room was closed. There were no audible or visual signals that any call lights were activated. Upon entry into the room, R142 was observed seated upright in bed, wearing a cervical collar. The resident reported they were extremely upset and had been waiting for their medication now for over an hour and was in pain. When asked about their pain level on a scale of 0-10 with 10 being the worst, R142 reported their current pain level was a 5. When asked if they pressed the call light for help, they reported their roommate did (for them). Review of the clinical record revealed R142 was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate assessments and physician orders with medical symptoms were completed for audible position change alarms for two (R6 and R342) of two Residents reviewed for restraints resulting in the potential to restrict body movements due to the fear of sounding the alarm with physical discomfort and psychological distress utilizing a reasonable person concept. Findings include: R6 Record review revealed R6 was recently admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6's admission diagnoses included urinary tract infection, peripheral vascular disease, heart disease, diabetes and Alzheimer's disease. Based on the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE], R6 was able to make their needs known and they were living at home with their wife prior to this admission. An initial observation was completed on 3/4/25 at approximately 10:45 AM. R6 was observed sitting in their wheelchair (WC) with a position change alarm box in their wheelchair. When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a positioning device (hand splints) were implemented for one (R16) of one resident reviewed for positioning and range of motion services resulting in the potential for contracture progression (hardening of the muscles, tendons, and other soft tissues) with further decline in range of motion and compromise with skin integrity. Findings include: R16 R16 was a long-term resident originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R16's admitting diagnoses included traumatic brain injury from motor vehicle accident, quadriplegia (paralysis of both arms and both legs) and seizures. R16 had a tracheostomy (An opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea/windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs) and they were breathing with the assistance of a ventilator (breathing machine). R16 was non-verbal and were totally dependent on staff assistance with all their needs. An initial observation was completed on 3/4/25 at approximately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was consistently administered as ordered by the Physician for one (R14) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: On 2/4/25 at 9:22 AM, R14 was observed lying on their back in bed. Oxygen tubing was observed on the bed, disconnected from the oxygen concentrator. At this time Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C asked to reconnect and apply R14's oxygen. LPN C stated R14 always takes out their oxygen tubing on their own. LPN C proceeded to reconnect the tubing to the concentrator and apply the nasal cannula to R14. A review of the medical record revealed R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: sepsis and delirium. R14 required assistance from staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a Physician order documented the following: Oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 LPM (Liters Per Minute) Maintain SPO2 (oxygen saturation) = (equal) or > (greater than) 90%.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications had an indication for use and failed to transcribe physician orders per the facility policy for two (R's 5 and 7) of two residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R5 On 3/4/25 at 9:55 AM, R5 was observed lying back in their bed. Oxygen was observed being administered via nasal cannula and an interview was conducted with the resident at that time. A review of the medical record revealed R5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: fracture of lower end of the left femur. Review of the Physician orders revealed the following: Bupropion sustained release 150 mg (milligram) twice a day. For the diagnosis section on the order, staff documented N/A (not applicable). Trazodone 150 mg once daily. For the diagnosis section on the order, staff documented N/A. Xanax 1 mg twice a day PRN (as needed). For the diagnosis section on the order, staff documented N/A.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-14 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $280K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI